Evaluation of an automated, highly sensitive, real-time PCR-based assay (COBAS Amplipreptrade mark/COBAS TaqMantrade mark) for quantification of HCV RNA

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and its therapy is based on qualitative and quantitative measurement of HCV RNA. OBJECTIVES: A new assay that employs automated specimen extraction and real-time RT-PCR (COBAS Amplipreptrade mark/COBAS TaqMantrade mark, "CAP/CTM", Roche Diagnostics, Pleasanton, USA) was designed for linear quantification and highly sensitive detection of HCV RNA. STUDY DESIGN: The performance characteristics of CAP/CTM were compared to standard RT-PCR-based COBAS Amplicor Monitor 2.0 (CAM) assay in a multicenter study. RESULTS: The limit of detection of CAP/CTM was 7.4IU/ml (95% CI 6.2-10.6) and clinical specificity was 99%. The linear range of HCV RNA quantification by CAP/CTM was between 28 and 1.4x10(7)IU/ml, with a correlation coefficient between expected and observed results of >0.99. A fivefold dilution of serum- or plasma-samples showed a linear correlation of HCV RNA levels in undiluted and diluted samples. Analyses of the mean intra- and inter-assay imprecision within the linear range of quantification showed a coefficient of variation of 3% and 3%, respectively. HCV genotypes 1a/b, 2b, 3a, 4, 5 and 6 were equally quantified by the CAP/CTM and CAM assay with mean deviations ranging from -0.29log(10) to 0.32log(10)IU/ml. HCV RNA quantification by CAP/CTM and CAM was highly concordant (correlation coefficient of 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: The CAP/CTM assay is a reliable and robust assay for highly sensitive detection and quantification of HCV RNA within a broad linear range.     

Clinical evaluation of the COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS TaqMan for HCV RNA quantitation in comparison with the branched-DNA assay

Diagnosis and monitoring of HCV infection relies on sensitive and accurate HCV RNA detection and quantitation. The performance of the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan 48 (CAP/CTM) (Roche, Branchburg, NJ), a fully automated, real-time PCR HCV RNA quantitative test was assessed and compared with the branched-DNA (bDNA) assay. Clinical evaluation on 576 specimens obtained from patients with chronic hepatitis C showed a good correlation (r = 0.893) between the two test, but the CAP/CTM scored higher HCV RNA titers than the bDNA across all viral genotypes. The mean bDNA versus CAP/CTM log10 IU/ml differences were -0.49, -0.4, -0.54, -0.26 for genotype 1a, 1b, 2a/2c, 3a, and 4, respectively. These differences reached statistical significance for genotypes 1b, 2a/c, and 3a. The ability of the CAP/CTM to monitor patients undergoing antiviral therapy and correctly identify the weeks 4 and 12 rapid and early virological responses was confirmed. The broader dynamic range of the CAP/CTM compared with the bDNA allowed for a better definition of viral kinetics. In conclusion, the CAP/CTM appears as a reliable and user-friendly assay to monitor HCV viremia during treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis. Its high sensitivity and wide dynamic range may help a better definition of viral load changes during antiviral therapy.     

The Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV Test,Version 2.0, Real-Time PCR Assay Accurately Quantifies Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 4 RNA

Accurate hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA quantification is mandatory for the management of chronic hepatitis C therapy. The first-generation Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV test (CAP/CTM HCV) underestimated HCV RNA levels by >1-log₁₀ international units/ml in a number of patients infected with HCV genotype 4 and occasionally failed to detect it. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV test, version 2.0 (CAP/CTM HCV v2.0), to accurately quantify HCV RNA in a large series of patients infected with different subtypes of HCV genotype 4. Group A comprised 122 patients with chronic HCV genotype 4 infection, and group B comprised 4 patients with HCV genotype 4 in whom HCV RNA was undetectable using the CAP/CTM HCV. Each specimen was tested with the third-generation branched DNA (bDNA) assay, CAP/CTM HCV, and CAP/CTM HCV v2.0. The HCV RNA level was lower in CAP/CTM HCV than in bDNA in 76.2% of cases, regardless of the HCV genotype 4 subtype. In contrast, the correlation between bDNA and CAP/CTM HCV v2.0 values was excellent. CAP/CTM HCV v2.0 accurately quantified HCV RNA levels in the presence of an A-to-T substitution at position 165 alone or combined with a G-to-A substitution at position 145 of the 5′ untranslated region of HCV genome. In conclusion, CAP/CTM HCV v2.0 accurately quantifies HCV RNA in genotype 4 clinical specimens, regardless of the subtype, and can be confidently used in clinical trials and clinical practice with this genotype.     

Verification of an assay for quantification of hepatitis C virus RNA by use of an analyte-specific reagent and two different extraction methods

Protocols were designed for quantification and detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA by the use of an analyte-specific reagent (ASR) (Roche COBAS TaqMan48 [CTM48] HCV) after manual and automated RNA extraction. The purposes were to determine (i) assay performance characteristics using manual and automated RNA extraction methods, (ii) whether measurable range and limit of detection (LOD) of the ASR assay were influenced by genotype, and (iii) correlation of quantification by CTM48 HCV ASR and COBAS Monitor HCV v. 2.0. For HCV genotype 1 (Gt1), the lower limits of quantification after manual extraction were slightly lower than those for automated extraction (1.0 versus 1.5 log(10) IU/ml). Results were linear up to the highest concentration tested after extraction by both methods (manual, 6.1 log(10); automated, 6.4 log(10)). Similar results were obtained for Gt2 (1.8 to 6.8 log(10) IU/ml) and Gt3 (1.6 to 6.8 log(10) IU/ml) after automated extraction. The LOD of Gt1 virus was 10 IU/ml after manual extraction and between 25 and 37.5 IU/ml after automated extraction. Results with Gt2 and Gt3 viruses were similar after automated extraction (Gt2, between 25 and 50 IU/ml; Gt3, 25 IU/ml). Variability (intrarun and interrun, at concentrations throughout the range of quantification) was 相似文献   

Necessity for Reassessment of Patients with Serogroup 2 Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) and Undetectable Serum HCV RNA

We encountered a patient positive for anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) whose serum HCV RNA was undetectable with the Roche AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV assay (CAP/CTM) version 1 but showed a high viral load with the Abbott RealTime HCV assay (ART). Discrepancies in the detectability of serum HCV RNA were investigated among 891 consecutive patients who were positive for anti-HCV. Specific nucleotide variations causing the undetectability of HCV RNA were determined and confirmed by synthesizing RNA coding those variations. Serum samples with the discrepancies were also reassessed by CAP/CTM version 2. Among the 891 anti-HCV-positive patients, 4 patients had serum HCV RNA levels that were undetectable by CAP/CTM version 1 despite having levels of >5 log IU/ml that were detected by ART. All four patients had HCV genotype 2a and high titers of anti-HCV. Sequencing of the HCV 5′ noncoding regions revealed 2 common variations, A at nucleotide (nt) 145 and T at nt 151. Synthesized RNAs of the HCV 5′ noncoding region with standard (NCR145G151C) and variant nucleotides at nt 145 and nt 151 were quantified with CAP/CTM. RNAs of NCR145G151C and NCR145G151T were quantifiable with CAP/CTM version 1, while those of NCR145A151T and NCR145A151C went undetected. The substitution from G to A at nt 145 specifically conferred this undetectability, while this undetectability was reverted in synthesized HCV RNA with correction of this variation. Reassessment of these samples by CAP/CTM version 2 resulted in similar levels of HCV RNA being detected by ART. We conclude that HCV patients with undetectable HCV RNA by CAP/CTM version 1 should be reassessed for viral quantification.     

Abbott RealTime Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) and Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV Assays for Prediction of Sustained Virological Response to Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients

Two commercial real-time PCR assays are currently available for sensitive hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA quantification: the Abbott RealTime HCV assay (ART) and Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV assay (CAP/CTM). We assessed whether the two real-time PCR assays were more effective than Roche Cobas Amplicor HCV Monitor test, v.2.0 (CAM) for prediction of the sustained virological response (SVR) to pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) in chronic hepatitis C. Sixty patients chronically infected with HCV genotype 1b (37 males and 23 females, 53 ± 12 years of age) were treated with PEG-IFNα2b plus RBV for 48 weeks. Stored specimens at nine time points for each patient (at baseline, on treatment, and 24 weeks after treatment) were tested by the two real-time PCR assays and CAM. Twenty-six (43.3%) patients reached SVR. The positive predictive values (PPVs) for SVR of undetectable HCV RNA at week 12 by CAM, ART, and CAP/CTM were 74.3%, 88.0%, and 95.2%, respectively. An undetectable HCV RNA level by CAM, ART, and CAP/CTM correctly predicted SVR at week 4 in 100%, 100%, and 100% of patients, at weeks 5 to 8 in 91.7%, 100%, and 100% of patients, at weeks 9 to 12 in 55.6%, 75%, and 87.5% of patients, and at weeks 13 to 24 in 0%, 26.7%, and 40% of patients, respectively. Of 16 patients who relapsed after treatment, HCV RNA was detectable in 2 patients at the end of treatment by CAP/CTM but undetectable by ART and CAM. HCV RNA tests using ART and CAP/CTM are considered to be more effective at predicting SVR than CAM, and the PPV for SVR was slightly higher in CAP/CTM than in ART.     

Second-Generation Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV Quantitative Test for Viral Load Monitoring: a Novel Dual-Probe Assay Design

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA viral load (VL) monitoring is a well-established diagnostic tool for the management of chronic hepatitis C patients. HCV RNA VL results are used to make treatment decisions with the goal of therapy to achieve an undetectable VL result. Therefore, a sensitive assay with high specificity in detecting and accurately quantifying HCV RNA across genotypes is critical. Additionally, a lower sample volume requirement is desirable for the laboratory and the patient. This study evaluated the performance characteristics of a second-generation real-time PCR assay, the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV quantitative test, version 2.0 (CAP/CTM HCV test, v2.0), designed with a novel dual-probe approach and an optimized automated extraction and amplification procedure. The new assay demonstrated a limit of detection and lower limit of quantification of 15 IU/ml across all HCV genotypes and was linear from 15 to 100,000,000 IU/ml with high accuracy (<0.2-log₁₀ difference) and precision (standard deviation of 0.04 to 0.22 log₁₀). A specificity of 100% was demonstrated with 600 HCV-seronegative specimens without cross-reactivity or interference. Correlation to the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV test (version 1) was good (n = 412 genotype 1 to 6 samples, R² = 0.88; R² = 0.94 without 105 genotype 4 samples). Paired plasma and serum samples showed similar performance (n = 25, R² = 0.99). The sample input volume was reduced from 1 to 0.65 ml in the second version. The CAP/CTM HCV test, v2.0, demonstrated excellent performance and sensitivity across all HCV genotypes with a smaller sample volume. The new HCV RNA VL assay has performance characteristics that make it suitable for use with currently available direct-acting antiviral agents.     

Prediction of the efficacy of antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus infection by an ultrasensitive RT-PCR assay

The efficacy of interferon therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection improved remarkably. However, virologic relapse occurs in a substantial proportion of patients with virologic response (defined as an HCV RNA level below 50 IU/ml at the end-of-treatment). A highly sensitive RT-nested PCR assay capable of detecting almost a single copy of HCV RNA and a real-time RT-PCR assay to quantify HCV RNA down to 120 copies per ml were developed. The RT-nested PCR assay showed that 1 IU of HCV RNA is equivalent to 12.2 copies. For 28 patients with virologic response (12 relapsers and 16 sustained virologic responders), week-4 and end-of-treatment plasma samples were retested. At week 4, HCV RNA was detected by the RT-nested PCR and qualitative COBAS Amplicor HCV version 2.0 in 8/9 (89%) and 6/9 (67%) samples from relapsers, and in 4/16 (25%) and 2/16 (13%) samples from sustained virologic responders, respectively. End-of-treatment samples with HCV-negative by the qualitative COBAS Amplicor were positive by the present assay in 4/12 (25%) of relapsing patients and 0/16 (0%) of sustained virologic responders. The viral levels detected by the present assay in the Amplicor-negative samples were 3.5-17.3 copies/ml, which is below the detection limit of COBAS Amplicor. In conclusion, the highly sensitive RT-nested PCR assay can predict sustained virologic response at week 4 and virologic relapse at the end-of-treatment more accurately than COBAS Amplicor, suggesting its usefulness in monitoring antiviral therapy for HCV infection.     

Evaluation of the COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® HCV Test,v2.0 and comparison to assays used in routine clinical practice in an international multicenter clinical trial: The ExPECT study

BackgroundThe COBAS^® AmpliPrep^®/COBAS^® TaqMan^® HCV Test, v2.0 (CAP/CTM2) is used for HCV RNA viral load monitoring.ObjectivesThe performance of the CAP/CTM2 was compared to other widely used tests, including a manual version of the assay (the COBAS^® TaqMan^® HCV Test, v2.0 for use with the High Pure System, HPS/CTM2) predominantly used during phase III clinical trials for the new direct acting antiviral therapies.Study designLow HCV RNA level comparisons were performed across tests (Abbott Realtime HCV Test, ART; COBAS^® AmpliPrep^®/COBAS^® TaqMan^® HCV Test, v1.0, CAP/CTM1; CAP/CTM2; and HPS/CTM2) using dilutions of the 2nd HCV WHO International Standard. Additionally, the clinical performance of the CAP/CTM2 was evaluated with 421 leftover HCV RNA-positive routine clinical samples.ResultsAll quantifiable WHO dilutions were within ±0.3 log₁₀ IU/mL of the expected results across tests and the analytical sensitivity resulted in a limit of detection of 12 IU/mL (95% confidence interval, 10, 15). When clinical samples were tested the results for 87% (367 of 421) of all sample comparisons were within ±0.5 log₁₀ IU/mL. When low viral load results (25–3500 IU/mL) were compared, values obtained by the ART assay were significantly lower (p < 0.0001) than those obtained with the CAP/CTM2.ConclusionsThe new CAP/CTM2 showed good accuracy with comparable sensitivity to comparator assays. The new kit is well-suited for use in the routine diagnostic laboratory, especially for accurate monitoring of patients receiving triple therapy or interferone-free regimens.     

Evaluation of a novel internally controlled real-time PCR assay targeting the 16S rRNA gene for confirmation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections.

A novel HybProbe real-time LightCycler PCR assay was developed for confirmation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in samples positive according to the COBAS AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis/Neisseria gonorrhoeae PCR assay. The new assay amplifies 375 bp of the N. gonorrhoeae 16S rRNA gene and includes an internal amplification control introduced during DNA purification. The assay had 100% specificity because of the high specificity of the HybProbes and primers. Other Neisseria spp. failed to generate positive crossing-point values and melting peaks. The analytical sensitivity for N. gonorrhoeae DNA was 0.5 fg/PCR, corresponding to 0.3 CFU/PCR. Sensitivity was not impaired in the presence of higher DNA concentrations (>or=1000-fold) from Neisseria spp. other than N. gonorrhoeae. The sensitivity was similar to that reported for the COBAS AMPLICOR assay with cervical swab samples. To assess its clinical applicability as a confirmatory test, 38 (2.9%) of 1313 swabs that were positive according to the COBAS AMPLICOR assay were tested using the new in-house assay and the commercially available GenFlow Neisseria test. Twenty-one samples negative according to COBAS AMPLICOR also underwent confirmatory testing. Both confirmatory tests yielded identical results; the 21 negative samples remained negative, and only 11 (28.9%) of the samples positive according to COBAS AMPLICOR were positive after retesting, suggesting a low prevalence (0.84%) of N. gonorrhoeae infection in the study population. These data suggest that the novel real-time PCR assay is an excellent and easy to interpret confirmatory test for the existing COBAS AMPLICOR assay for N. gonorrhoeae.     

Evaluation of the Abbott RealTime HCV assay for quantitative detection of hepatitis C virus RNA.

BACKGROUND: The Abbott RealTime HCV assay for quantitative detection of HCV RNA has recently been introduced. OBJECTIVES: In this study, the performance of the Abbott RealTime HCV assay was evaluated and compared to the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV test. STUDY DESIGN: Accuracy, linearity, interassay and intra-assay variations were determined, and a total of 243 routine clinical samples were investigated. RESULTS: When accuracy of the new assay was tested, the majority of results were found to be within +/-0.5 log(10) unit of the results obtained by reference laboratories. Determination of linearity resulted in a quasilinear curve up to 1.0 x 10(6)IU/ml. The interassay variation ranged from 15% to 32%, and the intra-assay variation ranged from 5% to 8%. When clinical samples were tested by the Abbott RealTime HCV assay and the results were compared with those obtained by the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV test, the results for 93% of all samples with positive results by both tests were found to be within +/-1.0 log(10) unit. The viral loads for all patients measured by the Abbott and Roche assays showed a high correlation (R(2)=0.93); quantitative results obtained by the Abbott assay were found to be lower than those obtained by the Roche assay. CONCLUSIONS: The Abbott RealTime HCV assay proved to be suitable for use in the routine diagnostic laboratory. The time to results was similar for both of the assays.     

Evaluation of the clinical usefulness of COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR assay (ver2.0): Comparison with AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR assay (ver1.0) and HCV core protein level

The quantitation of serum levels of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in chronic hepatitis C has been regarded as one of the most important indicators for the outcome of interferon (IFN) therapy. The AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 1.0 (AMPLICOR v1.0) assay is widely used for the evaluation of the HCV level. A new generation assay called the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 2.0 (COBAS v2.0) assay, which is semiautomated and modified to amplify all genotypes equally, has been developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of the COBAS v2.0 assay in comparison with the AMPLICOR v1.0 assay and HCV core protein assay in patients with chronic hepatitis C before IFN therapy. HCV RNA was detectable in 230 cases (97.5%) and undetectable in 6 cases (2.5%) by the COBAS v2.0 assay. The RNA levels measured by the AMPLICOR v1.0 assay correlated significantly with those measured by the COBAS v2.0 assay, and the sensitivity of the new version 2.0 assay was better than that of version 1.0, especially in serotype 2. In relation to the outcome of IFN therapy, HCV RNA levels from virologically sustained responders by the AMPLICOR v1.0 assay were 82.3 +/- 22.9 kcopies/ml in serotype 1 and 36.9 +/- 13.4 kcopies/ml in serotype 2, and those from virologically nonsustained responders were 525.2 +/- 48.6 kcopies/ml in serotype 1 and 76.7 +/- 19.5 kcopies/ml in serotype 2.The rates of sustained response to <100 kcopies/ml were 34/63 (54.0%) in serotype 1 and 24/48 (50.0%) in serotype 2. A statistically significant virological response was seen in serotype 1 (P < 0.0001), but not in serotype 2. In contrast, the levels in virologically sustained responders by the COBAS v2.0 assay were 88.2 +/- 20.5 KIU/ml in serotype 1 and 136.8 +/- 40.1 KIU/ml in serotype 2, and those in virologically nonsustained responders were 608.8 +/- 48.4 KIU/ml in serotype 1 and 328.3 +/- 62.8 KIU/ml in serotype 2. The rates of sustained response to <100 KIU/ml were 33/60 (55.0%) in serotype 1 and 21/35 (60.0%) in serotype 2. Statistical significance in virological response was seen in both serotype 1 (P < 0.0001) and serotype 2 (P < 0.05). Although the sensitivity of the HCV core protein assay was lower than that with the COBAS v2.0 assay, the HCV core protein levels also correlated well with the results of the COBAS v2.0 assay. The HCV core protein levels of virologically sustained responders were 37.6 +/- 12.0 pg/ml in serotype 1, 81.3 +/- 37.0 pg/ml in serotype 2, and those of virologically nonsustained responders were 289.9 +/- 23.5 pg/ml in serotype 1, 191.4 +/- 32.1 pg/ml in serotype 2. This assay could predict the outcome of IFN therapy in both serotype 1 (P < 0.0001) and serotype 2 (P < 0.05). Thus, both the COBAS v2.0 assay and the HCV core protein assay showed that the viral load was an indicator of virologically sustained response in serotype 2 and in serotype 1.     

Evaluation of an automated sample preparation protocol for quantitative detection of hepatitis C virus RNA

The COBAS AMPLIPREP instrument for automated sample preparation has recently been introduced. In this study, the COBAS AMPLIPREP/COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR test, which includes this new molecular device, was evaluated and compared to the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR test, which includes a manual extraction protocol. Interassay and intra-assay variation, precision, and linearity were determined, and a total of 130 clinical specimens were investigated. For determination of interassay variation, coefficients of variation were found to be between 9 and 59% for the COBAS AMPLIPREP/COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR test and between 13 and 69% for the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR test. For determination of intra-assay variation, coefficients of variation were found to be between 7 and 13% for the COBAS AMPLIPREP/COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR test and between 8 and 16% for the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR test. When precision of the COBAS AMPLIPREP/COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR test was tested, all results were found to be within +/-0.5 log of the expected results. Determination of linearity resulted in a quasilinear curve over 3 logs. When clinical samples were tested with the COBAS AMPLIPREP/COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR test and compared with the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR test, all results were found within +/-0.5 log. In conclusion, the assay, which included the new molecular device, proved to be suitable for the routine molecular laboratory. It was found to be laborsaving and easy to handle.     

Evaluation of the COBAS TaqMan HCV test with automated sample processing using the MagNA pure LC instrument

The COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (TaqMan HCV; Roche Molecular Systems Inc., Branchburg, N.J.) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) performed on the COBAS TaqMan 48 Analyzer (Roche Molecular Systems) currently relies on a manual sample processing method. Implementation of an automated sample processing method would facilitate the clinical use of this test. In this study, we evaluated the performance characteristics of TaqMan HCV following automated sample processing by the MagNA Pure LC instrument (MP; Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, Ind.). The analytical sensitivity of TaqMan HCV following sample processing by MP was 8.1 IU/ml (95% confidence interval, 6.1 to 15.2). The assay showed good linearity (R(2) = 0.99) across a wide range of HCV RNA levels (25 to 5 x 10(6) IU/ml), with coefficients of variation ranging from 10% to 46%. Among 83 clinical specimens, the sensitivity and specificity of TaqMan HCV were 100% and 95%, respectively, when compared to the COBAS AMPLICOR hepatitis C virus test, version 2.0 (COBAS AMPLICOR; Roche Molecular Systems), with TaqMan HCV detecting two more HCV RNA-positive specimens than COBAS AMPLICOR. Both specimens were confirmed to be HCV RNA positive by the VERSANT HCV RNA qualitative test (Bayer HealthCare LLC, Tarrytown, N.Y.). There was also strong correlation (R(2) = 0.95) and good agreement between the results from TaqMan HCV and the VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 assay (bDNA) (Bayer HealthCare LLC) among a group of 93 clinical specimens. The MP is a versatile, labor-saving sample processing platform suitable for reliable performance of TaqMan HCV.     

Early diagnosis of in utero and intrapartum HIV infection in infants prior to 6 weeks of age

Early initiation of antiretroviral therapy reduces HIV-related infant mortality. The early peak of pediatric HIV-related deaths in South Africa occurs at 3 months of age, coinciding with the earliest age at which treatment is initiated following PCR testing at 6 weeks of age. Earlier diagnosis is necessary to reduce infant mortality. The performances of the Amplicor DNA PCR, COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan (CAP/CTM), and Aptima assays for detecting early HIV infection (acquired in utero and intrapartum) up to 6 weeks of age were compared. Dried blood spots (DBS) were collected at birth and at 2, 4, and 6 weeks from HIV-exposed infants enrolled in an observational cohort study in Johannesburg, South Africa. HIV status was determined at 6 weeks by DNA PCR on whole blood. Serial DBS samples from all HIV-infected infants and two HIV-uninfected, age-matched controls were tested with the 3 assays. Of 710 infants of known HIV status, 38 (5.4%) had in utero (n = 29) or intrapartum (n = 9) infections. By 14 weeks, when treatment should have been initiated, 13 (45%) in utero-infected and 2 (22%) intrapartum-infected infants had died or were lost to follow-up. The CAP/CTM and Aptima assays identified 76.3% of all infants with early HIV infections at birth and by 4 weeks were 96% sensitive. DNA PCR demonstrated lower sensitivities at birth and 4 weeks of 68.4% and 87.5%, respectively. All assays had the lowest sensitivity at 2 weeks of age. CAP/CTM was the only assay with 100% specificity at all ages. Testing at birth versus 6 weeks of age identifies a higher total number of HIV-infected infants, irrespective of the assay.