Clinical evaluation of single-tooth mini-implant restorations: a five-year retrospective study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Placement of small diameter implants often provides a solution to space problems in implant restoration. Analysis of the success of this type of implant restoration has not been clearly determined. PURPOSE: This 5-year retrospective study presents results from 52 mini-implants for single-tooth restorations placed in 44 patients from 1992 to 1994. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Dental records of 44 patients with 52 mini-implants placed during 1992-94 were reviewed. The implants were all placed by the same surgeon and the single-tooth custom screwed posts with cemented crowns were positioned on the implants by the same prosthodontist. RESULTS: The results achieved by the mini-implant rehabilitation were similar to those reported for standard single-tooth implant restoration. Total implant survival rate was 94.2%. Two implants were lost at second stage surgery, and another was lost after temporary loading. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that single-tooth mini-implant restoration can be a successful treatment alternative to solve both functional and esthetic problems. They may represent the preferred choice in cases where space problems limit the use of standard or wide diameter implants.     

A 10‐Year Prospective Study of Single Tooth Implants Placed in the Anterior Maxilla

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the biological and technical outcomes of early and delayed placed single tooth implants after 10 years of follow‐up. Materials and Methods: Twenty consecutive patients who needed a single tooth replacement in the anterior maxilla were included in this study. Ten implants were placed with an early placement protocol, that is, 4 weeks after tooth extraction, whereas the other 10 implants were placed with a conventional delayed placement protocol, for example, 12 weeks after tooth extraction. At the baseline and at the annual re‐examinations, pain from implant regions, mobility, plaque, mucositis, and marginal bone levels were recorded. Biological and technical complications were registered. The patients evaluated the functional and aesthetic outcomes subjectively on a visual analogue scale after 3 and 10 years. Results: All implants were still in situ after 10 years. The cumulative implant survival rate was 100%. Two implant‐supported crowns were remade because of ceramic fractures. The 10‐year crown survival rate was 90%. No significant differences in implant survival rates were found between the early and delayed protocols, regarding plaque retention, mucositis, or marginal bone levels. After 10 years, the mean marginal bone loss at both sides of the implants was less than 1.0 mm in the two groups. During the 10‐year interval, 1 patient lost more than 1.5 mm of marginal bone, 3 patients lost between 1.0 mm and 1.4 mm of bone, and 16 patients lost less than 1.0 mm of bone as an average of the mesial and distal bone loss. Conclusions: This 10‐year prospective clinical trial demonstrated a 100% implant survival and a 90% crown survival. The average marginal bone level change was less than 1 mm, and there was no difference between early and delayed implant placement. Patient satisfaction with the implant‐supported single crowns reduced with time.     

小直径种植体临床应用疗效评价

目的评价小直径(直径2.5～3.0 mm)种植体的临床应用疗效和特点。方法对2007年1月至2010年1月在山东大学口腔医院口腔颌面外科接受小直径种植体治疗的42例患者的临床资料进行回顾分析。42例患者共植入小直径种植体51颗,其中36例患者(44颗种植体)行延期修复,6例(7颗种植体)行即刻修复。定期行临床检查、X线片检查,评价分析小直径种植体3年累计存留率、边缘骨吸收情况、软组织及美学效果、修复体并发症等。结果 1颗种植体(Osstem)植入后2个月因牙周病导致种植体周围炎而脱落,1颗种植体(Compress)植入后3年固位螺丝折断,种植体3年累计存留率为96.1%;种植体边缘平均骨吸收高度第1年为1.2 mm,以后平均每年0.2 mm;修复后1颗烤瓷修复冠松动。结论在本研究观察时间范围内认为小直径种植体适用于临床缺牙间隙三维空间不足的病例,其长期的的临床疗效有待进一步观察。     

A retrospective evaluation of 1,387 single-tooth implants: a 6-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the overall survival rate and factors that affect the clinical outcome of 1,387 consecutively placed implant-supported single restorations up to 6 years. METHODS: During 6 years (1999 to 2005), 1,387 implants were placed in 1,215 subjects (1,073 males and 142 females) who required single-tooth replacements. The average time from implant placement was 2.7 +/- 3.27 years. Implants were mostly placed in the maxillary premolar area (39.5%) followed by the anterior maxillary area (28.7%). Implant survival and location, need for bone augmentation, and implant dimensions were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Failed implants totaled 96, resulting in an overall survival rate of 93.1%. The vast majority of failures (94.8%) occurred during the first year following implant placement. Bone augmentation was performed in 9.7% of the implants with a 92.5% survival rate, similar to the survival rate of non-augmented areas (93.1%; P = 0.79). The average implant length was 13.3 mm, ranging from 8 to 16 mm. Longer implants (> or =11 mm) showed similar survival rates as implants <11 mm (93.2% versus 90.2%, respectively; P = 0.4). Implant width ranged between 3.25 to 5 mm (mean 3.9), with no effect on implant survival (P = 0.43). There was a significant difference in implant survival according to the anatomic zone of implant placement (P = 0.0075). The maxillary premolar area showed the highest survival rate (96.2%). CONCLUSION: Implant-supported single-tooth replacement is a predictable procedure with good survival rates up to 6 years.     

Osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation: a clinical report

PURPOSE: It was the aim of the present study to clinically evaluate the success of osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation (OMSFE) using autogenous and xenogenic bone and a variety of screw-type implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From August 1995 to February 2003, 276 OMSFE procedures with simultaneous implant placement were completed in 167 patients. RESULTS: The mean residual bone height (RBH) of the alveolar ridge was 7.1 mm (range 3 to 10 mm). The mean increase in height of the implant sites using osteotome techniques was 3.8 mm (range 2 to 7 mm). Of the 276 implants placed, 240 had been loaded for an average of 27.9 months (range 1 to 84 months). There were a total of 18 failures: Ten implants failed to integrate, 3 implants were lost within the first 18 months of loading, 1 implant fractured after 3 years in function, and 4 implants demonstrated excessive bone loss. The overall survival rate was 93.5%. When only sites with an RBH of 4 mm or less were considered, the survival rate dropped to 73.3%. Small tears in the schneiderian membrane were clinically assessed at 13 sites, for a detectable perforation rate of 4.7%. DISCUSSION: The primary determinant in implant survival with OMSFE procedures was the height of the residual alveolar ridge. Implant design, graft material, and the method of sinus floor infracture (direct or bone-cushioned) exerted minimal influence on survival outcome; however, factors such as edentulism, osteoporosis, and an overdenture prosthesis were shown to negatively influence postloading survival of implants placed in areas of limited RBH. CONCLUSION: OMSFE procedures can be used predictably for implant placement at sites with moderate vertical deficiencies in the posterior maxilla.     

Fully vs. partially rough implants in maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized-controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVES: To compare implants with a rough surface in their whole length (FR) with implants having a 2 mm coronal machined portion (PR) when used in association with a sinus-lift procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with 2 mm< or =x< or =9 mm residual alveolar crest were prosthetically restored with implants after a staged sinus-lift procedure using osteotomes. In 13 randomly chosen patients, no more than one FR implant was placed (test group), while the rest were PR implants. The other 13 patients received only PR implants (control group). For comparisons, only one implant from each patient was used, i.e., from the test group only the 13 FR implants were used, while from the control group, one PR implant was randomly chosen. The presence/absence of plaque, BOP, PPD and REC were registered at the day of delivery of the restorations and after 1 year. Residual alveolar crest height and marginal bone levels around the implants were evaluated on standardized periapical radiographs taken at various stages. RESULTS: Four FR and two PR implants were lost, and the cumulative survival rate was 82.9% (six lost out of 35). There were no significant differences between the two groups. Implant type, residual alveolar crest height, time of osseointegration, time of implant loading and smoking did not seem to influence implant survival. CONCLUSIONS: FR and PR implants placed in augmented sinuses did not differ in their clinical performance.     

Clinical evaluation of short, machined-surface implants followed for 12 to 92 months

PURPOSE: Bone resorption following tooth loss often limits the quantity of bone available for implant placement. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of 10-mm or shorter machined-surface implants when used exclusively in the treatment of various forms of edentulism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred sixty-nine screw-type Br?nemark System implants (Nobel Biocare), 10 mm or shorter, were placed in 111 consecutively treated patients. Of the total, 88.8% were placed in the mandible and 11.2% were placed in the maxilla; 95.2% were used to treat partially edentulous situations, including single-tooth losses, of which 96.6% were in the premolar and molar regions. The patients were followed for periods of 12 to 92 months. RESULTS: Of the 269 placed implants, 12 were lost. The overall survival rate was 95.5%. Bone quality 2 and 3 (Lekholm-Zarb classification of 1985) was found in 88.8% of the treated sites. There was no statistical difference in the survival rate of the 10-mm implants when compared to the shorter series (P > .05) or between the various implant diameters. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.71 +/- 0.65 mm. DISCUSSION: The failure rate of 4.5% compares favorably with that of implants of different shape, surface characteristics, and length. Bone quality appeared to be the critical factor in implant survival, rather than bone quantity, in this patient series. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the survival of short, machined-surface implants when used for the treatment of partial edentulism in bone of good quality.     

A Prospective 1‐Year Clinical and Radiographic Study of Implants Placed after Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Synthetic Biphasic Calcium Phosphate or Deproteinized Bovine Bone

Background: The technique of using bone grafts or different biomaterials for augmentation of the maxillary sinus prior to implant placement is well accepted by clinicians. However, clinical documentation of some bone substitutes is still lacking. Purpose: This prospective study was designed to evaluate the success rate of implants placed after maxillary sinus augmentation with a novel synthetic biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) or deproteinized bovine bone (DBB), the latter acting as control. Material and Methods: Nine edentulous patients and two partially edentulous patients with a mean age of 67 years with a bilateral need for sinus augmentation, <5 mm residual bone in the floor of the sinus and a crestal width ≥4 mm, were included in the study. After bilateral elevation of the Schneiderian membrane, all patients were randomized for augmentation with synthetic BCP in one side and DBB in the contralateral side. After 8 months of graft healing, 62 implants with an SLActive surface were placed. Implant survival, graft resorption, plaque index, bleeding on probing, sulcus bleeding index, probing pocket depth, and implant success rate were evaluated after 1 year of functional loading. Results: After a mean of 118 days, all patients received their fixed prosthetic constructions. One implant was lost in each biomaterial, giving an overall survival rate of 96.8%. Success rates for implants placed in BCP and DBB were 91.7 and 95.7%, respectively. No significant difference in marginal bone loss was found around implants placed in BCP, DBB, or residual bone, respectively. The mean graft resorption was 0.43 mm (BCP) and 0.29 mm (DBB). Conclusion: In this limited study, implant success rate was not dependent on the biomaterial used for maxillary sinus augmentation. Similar results were found after 1 year of functional loading for implants placed after sinus augmentation using BCP or DBB.     

A short-term clinical evaluation of immediately restored maxillary TiOblast single-tooth implants

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term clinical outcome of single-tooth implants placed in the maxilla and immediately restored using cementless friction-fit temporary crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients consecutively referred to a private specialist practice for the replacement of failing or missing maxillary teeth were treated by means of immediate temporization of their single-tooth implants. Where teeth were still present, implants were placed immediately following extraction. Provisional crowns were fabricated on a special friction-fit coping by means of autopolymerizing acrylic resin. Definitive crowns were placed a mean of 4.5 months after surgery. Implant survival was recorded along with the level of the marginal bone relative to a fixed reference point 1 year after placement. Any adverse soft tissue changes were also noted. RESULTS: A total of 28 Astra Tech ST dental implants were placed. The overall survival rate at the end of the study was 96.4% for implants which were in function for periods ranging from 15.7 to 27 months. One patient, a smoker, lost 1 implant within 1 month of surgery. Mean marginal bone loss was 0.40 mm (range 0 to 1.53 mm) 1 year after placement of the implants. Many implants (37.5%) had no observed bone loss. No implants or crowns have been lost during the functional loading period. One implant was associated with an unfavorable recession of soft tissues; however, most maintained an esthetic gingival architecture. Eleven of 28 provisional restorations needed treatment; 6 required replacement during the temporization period, and 5 required cementation because of looseness. The ease of removal of the crowns allowed regular access for irrigation with chlorhexidine and thus maintenance of soft tissue health. DISCUSSION: The need to provide provisional restorations for single-tooth gaps often presents challenges. An immediate temporary partial denture or adhesive prosthesis may be unacceptable or impractical. The current study describes a simple method for the immediate temporization of single-tooth implants. The results did not indicate any negative influence on osseointegration or short-term survival once the implants were functionally loaded. CONCLUSION: Immediate temporization of maxillary single-tooth implants can be both safe and predictable, and it appears that the procedure can yield favorable soft tissue esthetics.     

Longitudinal follow-up of osseointegrated implants in patients with resected jaws

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of bone grafting and radiotherapy on implant survival rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This follow-up study involved 36 patients with 180 implants who were treated between January 1989 and December 2000 by prosthodontic rehabilitation using osseointegrated implants following jaw resection. They comprised 20 patients with malignant tumors, 12 with benign tumors, and 2 patients each with osteomyelitis and cysts. RESULTS: A total of 15 implants (11 in the maxilla and 4 in the mandible) were removed for various reasons during the follow-up study. Implant survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method; the overall survival rate for the 180 implants was 88.6%. Specific implant survival rates were as follows: in residual bone, 73.8% for the maxilla and 95.2% for the mandible; in grafted bone, 80% for the maxilla and 94.1% for the mandible; in irradiated bone, 79.7%; and in nonirradiated bone, 93.5%. DISCUSSION: Radiotherapy, a dose of 30 Gy, was performed in patients with malignant tumors but not in patients with benign tumors, cysts, or osteomyelitis. No differences were found in the results for implants placed due to jaw resection for malignant tumors and those for implants placed due to benign tumors, cysts, or osteomyelitis. Implants lost varied in length from 7 to 18 mm. Among these, loss was more frequent with shorter implants (lengths to 10 mm). CONCLUSION: The clinical results obtained in the present study compare favorably with those obtained by others. However, jaw reconstruction and rehabilitation should not be performed by the oral surgeon alone; oral and maxillofacial function should be restored using a team approach in close cooperation with specialists in prosthodontics and periodontics to improve the result of implant treatment.     

Single-tooth replacement with the Frialit-2 system: a retrospective clinical analysis of 146 implants

PURPOSE: This study was intended to provide a report of experience and results with Frialit-2 implants used for single-tooth replacement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 7-year period (1994-2000), 146 single-tooth implants (84 maxilla, 62 mandible) were placed in 112 patients (67 females, 45 males; 31.2 +/- 16.4 years). The sites included maxillary anterior teeth (n = 38) as well as the mandibular premolars and molars (n = 57). Ninety-three crowns were cemented and 53 crowns were screw mounted (22 with vertical, 31 with horizontal screws) on standard abutments. The follow-up time varied between 3 and 80 months (35.8 +/- 16.5 months). RESULTS: Two implants (1.4%) were lost, 1 during early loading and the other after 6 years. The most frequent prosthetic complication was isolated crown loosening of cemented crowns requiring recementation of 9 crowns (9.9%). Crowns with vertical screws showed no crown and/or screw loosening. Four crowns (2.8%) were replaced because of ceramic fracture. DISCUSSION: Peri-implant soft tissue condition, bone resorption, and Periotest values indicated satisfactory results. The cumulative implant survival rate during the follow-up period was 97.3%, and that of the crowns 96.4% (total cumulative survival rate 93.7%). CONCLUSIONS: With the low number of abutment screw loosenings (3.5%), the deep internal hexagonal retention compared favorably to external retention methods. The predominant use of long implants (98.4% > or = 13 mm) allowed a favorable implant/crown ratio with the potential for problem-free, long-term results.     

The clinical effectiveness of 6 mm diameter implants

BACKGROUND: Five- and 6 mm diameter screw-type endosseous implants have been used for the last decade. While some studies have reported very promising results (94% to 98% success rate), others have demonstrated survival rates below those clinically acceptable (75% to 87%). Moreover, such implants have been associated with increased cervical bone resorption and thread exposure. METHODS: Between June 1999 and July 2003, 43 patients received treatment with 6 mm diameter tapered hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants. A total of 45 implants were placed. All patients were recalled annually after implant exposure. One patient was lost to follow-up after 1 year. Forty-four implants were evaluated at the recall examinations. All implants supported a fixed prosthesis; in the majority of patients (35 implants), it was a single-tooth fixed prosthesis. The mean loading time was 23.4 months (range, 1 to 54 months). RESULTS: No implants were lost during the loading period. The overall survival rate was 100%. Crestal bone remodeling was examined using periapical radiographs. After a mean of 23.4 months in function, only one implant presented bone loss beyond the first thread. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that high survival rates can be obtained after prosthetic treatment with 6 mm-wide tapered HA-coated implants. Long-term prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.     

10‐Year Follow‐Up of Immediately Loaded Implants with TiUnite Porous Anodized Surface

Background: The immediate loading of implants with a porous anodized surface is a well‐described technique. Few data are however available on the long‐term outcomes. Purpose: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the 10‐year performance of TiUnite implants supporting fixed prostheses placed with an immediate loading approach in both postextractive and healed sites. Materials and Methods: All patients received a fixed provisional restoration supported by immediately loaded parallel design, self‐tapping implants with a porous anodized TiUnite surface, and an external‐hexagonal connection. Both healed and postextractive cases were included. Success and survival rate for restorations and implants, changes in marginal peri‐implant bone level, probing depth measurements, biological or technical complications, and any other adverse event were recorded at yearly follow‐up up to 10 years after surgery. Results: A total of 210 implants fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were consecutively placed in 59 patients. Forty‐seven (22.38%) implants were lost because of the recalled patient refused to attend the planned 10‐year follow‐up. Five over 210 (2.38%) implants were lost. At the final follow‐up, the accumulated mean marginal bone loss and probing depth were, respectively, 1.93 mm (SD 0.40) and 2.54 mm (SD 0.44) for the implants placed in healed sites (n = 84); 1.98 mm (SD 0.37) and 2.63 mm (SD 0.39) for the implants placed in postextractive sites (n = 74). The restorations examined achieved a cumulative 65.26% success rate and 97.96% survival rate. The implants placed in healed and postextractive sites, respectively, achieved a 98.05% and a 96.52% cumulative survival rate. Conclusions: Positive results in terms of bone maintenance in the long‐term perspective are to be expected using immediately loaded implants with a TiUnite porous anodized surface in both postextractive and healed sites when adequate levels of oral hygiene are kept.     

Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: implant survival and patients' perception

Objectives: To analyze the survival and success rates of implants installed utilizing the (transalveolar) osteotome technique, to compare peri‐implant soft tissue parameters and marginal bone levels of osteotome‐installed implants with implants placed using standard surgical procedures, and to evaluate patient‐centered outcomes. Material and methods: During 2000 to 2005, 252 Straumann^® dental implants were inserted in 181 patients. The surgical technique was a modification of the original osteotome technique presented by Summers. In addition to the clinical examination, the patients were asked to give their perception of the surgical procedure, utilizing a visual analogue scale. Results: The cumulative survival rate of the osteotome‐installed implants after a mean follow‐up time of 3.2 years, was 97.4% (95% confidence intervals: 94.4–98.8%). From the 252 implants inserted, three were lost before loading and another three were lost in the first and second year. According to residual bone height the survival was 91.3% for implant sites with ≤4 mm residual bone height, and 90% for sites with 4 mm and 5 mm, when compared with that of 100% in sites with bone height of above 5 mm. According to implant length the survival rates were 100% for 12 mm, 98.7% for 10 mm, 98.7% for 8 mm and only 47.6% for 6 mm implants. Soft tissue parameters (pocket probing depth, probing attachment level, bleeding on probing and marginal bone levels) did not yield any differences between the osteotome‐installed and the conventionally placed implants. More than 90% of the patients were satisfied with the implant therapy and would undergo similar therapy again if necessary. The cost associated with implant therapy was considered to be justified. Conclusion: In conclusion, the osteotome technique was a reliable method for implant insertion in the posterior maxilla, especially at sites with 5 mm or more of preoperative residual bone height and a relatively flat sinus floor.     

上颌窦侧壁抬升植骨种植的临床研究

目的:探讨应用上颌窦侧壁抬升植骨方法进行种植的优缺点和近远期效果。方法:2000年1月至2006年12月对28例患者行上颌窦侧壁抬升植骨种植。上颌窦底提升高度6.9mm-14.7mm,平均11.2mm。采用人工骨Bio-Oss或自体血提取的富血小板血浆(platelet-richplasma,PRP)与人工骨Bio-Oss混合填入上颌窦,用可吸收性胶原膜Bio-Gide覆盖。共抬升32侧,植入种植体57枚,均采用固定修复。种植后追踪时间9-62个月,平均28个月。观察方法为临床检查和X线检查,采用Wheeler存留标准评估,纳入Kaplan-Meier存留曲线统计。结果:在随访过程中,一颗植体在植入7个月后松动最终取出,其余植体稳定性良好,使用正常,患者满意,据Wheeler存留标准统计存留率为98.2%。结论:当上颌后牙区牙齿缺失且余留骨量不足时,通过上颌窦侧壁开窗抬升植骨可以有效增加骨高度,满足种植的骨条件,近远期效果理想。     

Survival of implants placed with the osteotome technique: An update

A literature review is made to analyze the survival of implants placed with the osteotome technique. A PubMed search was made based on the key words "osteotome AND dental implants", corresponding to publications between 1998-2008. The inclusion criteria were: a) a minimum of 10 patients; b) a minimum follow-up of 6 months; c) implants placed using the osteotome technique with or without indirect sinus lift; and d) specification of the implant number and survival rate. Sixty-four articles were identified, of which 20 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 2006 implants were placed in 1312 patients using the osteotome technique. The duration of follow-up after prosthetic loading ranged from 6-144 months. Indirect sinus lift was carried out in all but one of the studies. The residual crest height ranged from 2.8-12 mm, with a mean gain in bone after sinus lift of 2.5-5.1 mm. The time from implant placement to prosthetic loading varied from 1.5-9 months. The percentage implant survival rate was 85.1-100%. The survival rate of implants placed with the osteotome technique is high and does not differ with respect to implant placement with the conventional technique.     

Immediate loading of mandibular overdentures supported by unsplinted direct laser metal-forming implants: results from a 1-year prospective study

Background: At present, only some studies have dealt with immediate loading of unsplinted implants supporting mandibular overdentures. The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate treatment outcomes of mandibular overdentures supported by four one‐piece, unsplinted, immediately loaded, direct laser metal‐forming (DLMF) implants by assessing implant survival rate, implant success, marginal bone loss, and prosthetic complications. Methods: A total of 96 one‐piece DLMF implants were inserted in the edentulous mandible of 24 patients. Four implants were placed in each edentulous mandible. Immediately after implant placement, a mandibular overdenture was connected to the implants. At 1‐year follow‐up, clinical, radiographic, and prosthetic parameters were assessed. Success criteria included absence of pain, suppuration, and implant mobility; absence of continuous peri‐implant radiolucency; and distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact <1.5 mm. Results: After a 1‐year loading time, the overall implant survival rate was 98.9%, with only one implant lost. Among the surviving 95 implants, two did not fulfill the success criteria; therefore, the implant success rate was 97.8%. The mean distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact was 0.28 ± 0.30 mm (95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.32). Some prosthetic complications were reported. Conclusion: Based on the present results and within the limits of this study, the immediate loading of four unsplinted DLMF implants by means of ball attachment–supported mandibular overdentures seems to represent a safe and successful procedure.     

Clinical performance of wide-body implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: results of a 3-year follow-up study in a referral clinic

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 3-year success rates of wide-body implants with a regular- or wide-neck configuration and a sandblasted, large grit, acid-etched (SLA) surface. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 151 implants were consecutively placed in posterior sites of 116 partially edentulous patients in a referral clinic at the School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern. All implants were restored with cemented crowns or fixed partial dentures after a healing period of 6 to 8 weeks (for implants placed without simultaneous bone augmentation) or 10 to 14 weeks (for implants with simultaneous bone augmentation). All patients were recalled 36 months following implant placement for a clinical and radiographic examination. RESULTS: One implant failed to integrate during healing, and 11 implants were lost to follow-up and considered dropouts. The remaining 139 implants showed favorable clinical and radiographic findings and were considered successfully integrated at the 3-year examination. This resulted in a 3-year success rate of 99.3%. Radiographic evaluation of 134 implants indicated stability of the crestal bone levels: During the study period, the crestal bone level changed less than 0.5 mm for 129 implants. CONCLUSION: Successful tissue integration was achieved with wide-body implants with a regular or a wide-neck configuration and an SLA surface with high predictability. This successful tissue integration was well maintained for up to 3 years of follow-up.     

Endosseous implants and bone augmentation in the partially dentate maxilla: an analysis of 17 patients with a follow-up of 29 to 101 months

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the survival rate of endosseous implants placed in the partially dentate maxilla treated with sinus inlay block bone grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients were subjected to bone augmentation procedures prior to or in conjunction with implant placement. Bone volumes were regarded as insufficient for implant treatment unless a bone grafting procedure was performed. The patients were treated with sinus inlay block bone grafts and endosseous implants in a 1- or 2-stage procedure. A total of 69 implants were placed in the patients who were followed for 29 to 101 months (mean, 53.1 months). The retrospective patient group was also prospectively followed using a standardized clinical and radiographic study design. RESULTS: The implant survival rate was 91.3% (63/69). All implants were lost during the period from abutment connection to connection of the definitive prosthesis. All bone grafts were stable. Bone grafts supported 48 implants, of which 5 failed (10.4%). In the residual bone, 21 implants were placed, of which 1 failed (4.8%). All patients received a fixed partial prosthesis, which was stable during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The results of this investigation revealed a satisfactory clinical outcome of implant placement in grafted partially dentate maxillae after a mean follow-up of 53.1 months.     

3-year prospective multicenter study on one-stage implant surgery and early loading in the edentulous mandible

Background: The long‐term success rates achieved in dental implantology suggest that flexibility might well exist within the various implant systems to a degree that an altered protocol (ie, one‐stage surgery and immediate or early loading) can be performed under controlled conditions. However, before variations of the protocol can be considered for general use, they must be subjected to critical analysis, particularly with respect to the predictability of osseointegration, alteration of soft tissue barrier, and relative change in bone height around the implants. Purpose: The aim of this prospective multicenter study was to evaluate implant survival and periimplant conditions around endosseous implants placed in a one‐stage surgical procedure and early loading. Materials and Methods: A total of 170 implants were placed in 40 patients with mandibular edentulism and were functionally loaded within 6 weeks with overdentures (n = 30) or fixed prostheses (n = 10). All patients and prosthetic constructions were evaluated according to a standardized protocol during 3 years of follow‐up. Cumulative implant survival rates were calculated, and implant loss in relation to implant size and bone quality and quantity were evaluated. Furthermore, the protocol included assessment of clinical (plaque and bleeding scores, prosthesis stability) and radiographic parameters. Results: Over a period of 3 years, the implant survival rate was 93% for both implants and prostheses (fixed or removable). No implants were lost after the first year of loading. The periimplant tissues were in a healthy condition. Mean marginal bone resorption from the time of loading to the 3‐year follow‐up was 0.41 mm (SD 0.52). Conclusions: From this study it may be concluded that early loading results in good implant survival and proper periimplant health in edentulous mandibles.