Stability of the Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement using rigid fixation and porous block hydroxyapatite grafting

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability of maxillary advancement using bone plates for skeletal stabilization and porous block hydroxyapatite (PBHA) as a bone graft substitute for interpositional grafting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 78 patients (55 female, 23 male) with a diagnosis of anteroposterior maxillary hypoplasia were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent greater than 5 mm Le Fort I maxillary advancement with rigid fixation and PBHA interpositional grafting. The study sample was divided into 3 groups on the basis of the concurrent superior or inferior positioning of the maxillary incisors. Presurgery (T1), immediately postsurgery (T2), and longest follow-up (T3) lateral cephalometric tracings were superimposed to analyze for horizontal and vertical changes at the following landmarks: (1) point A, (2) incisal edge of the maxillary incisor, and (3) mesial cusp tip of maxillary first molar. RESULTS: The maxilla was inferiorly repositioned in 27 patients, superiorly repositioned in 21 patients, and advanced horizontally without a significant vertical change in 30 patients. All groups showed 0.5 mm or less horizontal and vertical relapse. There was no statistically significant difference between the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary advancement with Le Fort 1 osteotomies by using rigid fixation and interpositional PBHA grafting is a stable and predictable procedure regardless of the direction of vertical maxillary movement.     

Importance of soft tissue for skeletal stability in maxillary advancement in patients with cleft lip and palate.

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of stability of the advanced maxilla after two-jaw surgery and Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with cleft palate based on soft tissue planning. SUBJECTS: Between 1995 and 1998, 15 patients with cleft lip and palate deformities underwent advancement of a retruded maxilla, without insertion of additional bone grafts. Eleven patients had bimaxillary osteotomies and four patients only a Le Fort I osteotomy. Relapse of the maxilla in horizontal and vertical dimensions was evaluated by cephalometric analysis after a clinical follow-up of at least 2 years. RESULTS: In the bimaxillary osteotomies, horizontal advancement was an average 4 mm at point A. After 2 years, there was an additional advancement of point A of an average of 0.7 mm. In the mandible, a relapse of 0.8 mm was seen after an average setback of 3.9 mm. In the four patients with Le Fort I osteotomy, point A was advanced by 3.8 mm and the relapse after 2 years was 0.9 mm. Vertical elongation at point A resulted in relapse in both groups. Impaction of the maxilla led to further impaction as well. CONCLUSION: Cephalometric soft tissue analysis demonstrates the need for a two-jaw surgery, not only in severe maxillary hypoplasia. Alteration of soft tissue to functional harmony and three-dimensional correction of the maxillomandibular complex are easier to perform in a two-jaw procedure. It results in a more stable horizontal skeletal position of the maxilla.     

A comparison of the stability of single-piece and segmental Le Fort I maxillary advancements

This study retrospectively evaluated the stability of Le Fort I maxillary advancements and compared segmental and one-piece maxillary osteotomy procedures. A cephalometric analysis was performed on 26 cases of maxillary advancement. The sample comprised 11 cases of one-piece and 15 cases of segmental maxillary procedures. The tracings were superimposed and digitized by computer software, and the skeletal changes were analyzed before surgery, immediately after surgery, and at a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. Different values were compared by the paired and nonpaired t tests and were correlated by the Pearson correlation test. The significant value was set at a 95% confidence interval. The maxilla was advanced by a mean of 5.0 +/- 1.6 mm (P < 0.001), and the anterior maxilla was repositioned inferiorly by a mean of 1.5 +/- 3.3 mm (P < 0.05). The maxilla relapsed posteriorly by a mean of 0.6 +/- 1.2 mm (P < 0.05) and superiorly at the anterior maxilla by a mean of 0.8 +/- 1.1 mm (P < 0.001). Overjet and overbite did not significantly change (P > 0.05). It was concluded that maxillary advancement using rigid fixation and interpositional bone grafting in both groups was a stable procedure, particularly in the horizontal plane. In the one-piece group, there was a significantly higher relapse in the vertical plane than in the segmental group (P < 0.05), however. Minor skeletal relapse was compensated for by postoperative tooth movement, and segmental procedures are recommended when required to enhance occlusal results.     

Factors related to relapse after Le Fort I maxillary advancement osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with relapse after maxillary advancement in cleft lip and palate patient. SUBJECTS: Seventy-one cleft lip and palate patients underwent Le Fort I maxillary advancement osteotomy between 1988 and 1998, and 58 patients (42 unilateral cleft and 16 bilateral cleft) with complete data were investigated for relapse by clinical and cephalometric analysis. The clinical follow-up period ranged from 1.5 to 8.5 years (mean 2.5 years). RESULTS: Horizontal advancement averaged 6.9 mm. There was a significant correlation between surgical movement and postoperative relapse in both the horizontal and vertical planes. In vertical repositioning, 15 patients had maxillary intrusion and 31 had inferior repositioning. There was a significant difference between the intrusion group and the inferior repositioning group. There was a significant correlation between surgical and postoperative rotation regardless of the direction. Other factors were evaluated by the horizontal relapse rate. Type of cleft and the rate of relapse were statistically associated. A relapse was more likely to occur in patients with bilateral cleft. There were no significant associations with the rate of relapse in type of operations or previous alveolar bone grafting. There was no significant correlation between the rate of relapse and the number of missing anterior teeth, postoperative overbite and overjet, and age at operation. Four of 71 patients experienced major relapse, and 3 of them underwent jaw surgery again. CONCLUSIONS: Based on clinical and cephalometric analysis, two-jaw surgery should be performed in cases of severe maxillary hypoplasia, and overcorrection may be useful in inferior repositioning or surgical rotation. Special attention should be paid to the patient with bilateral cleft, multiple missing teeth, or shallow postoperative overbite.     

Maxillary quadrangular Le Fort I osteotomy: long-term skeletal stability and clinical outcome

The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term skeletal stability of the maxillary quadrangular Le Fort I osteotomy, and secondarily to determine patient overall experience and satisfaction with the surgical outcome. This retrospective cohort study evaluated a sample of patients with midface zygomatic-maxillary deficiency and Class III skeletal malocclusion. The primary outcome measure, on the basis of cephalometric analysis, was long-term vertical and horizontal skeletal stability in cleft and non-cleft patients, with and without interpositional autogenous iliac bone graft stabilization. A questionnaire measured patient overall experience and satisfaction with the surgery. One hundred twenty-one patients completed the questionnaire. Of these, 53 satisfied the cephalometric study inclusion criteria. Horizontal and vertical intraoperative movement and late postoperative movement showed overall high skeletal stability. No statistical difference in horizontal skeletal stability was noted between cleft and non-cleft patients, or between patients receiving or not receiving a bone graft. Mean satisfaction with the overall treatment result was 9.2 of 10 (10 being highest satisfaction). We conclude that the quadrangular Le Fort I osteotomy is a functionally stable and surgically predictable procedure for cleft and non-cleft patients with or without interpositional iliac bone graft, with a midfacial zygomatic-maxillary deficiency.     

Stability of maxillary advancement for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: preliminary results of an active control equivalence trial for semirigid and rigid fixation of the maxilla

In this paper preliminary results are presented of a prospective study designed to examine the effect of maxillary fixation methods on postoperative stability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability of Le Fort I osteotomy stabilized with semirigid fixation of the maxilla (SRMF) or rigid fixation of the maxilla (RMF). All patients had skeletal Class III malocclusion and underwent bimaxillary surgery (Le Fort I maxillary advancement with or without superior repositioning and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies of the mandible). Standardized cephalometric analysis was performed on serial radiographs of 42 patients immediately before surgery, 1 week after surgery, after release of fixation, and 1 year postoperatively. The patients were randomized into 2 treatment groups: 23 patients received RMF (group A), and 19 patients received SRMF (group B). Within the groups, patients showed good stability with regard to their baseline characteristics. To show the therapeutic equivalence of the 2 treatments, analysis of the recorded data followed the approach for an equivalence trial. The mean surgical advancement was 5.34 +/- 1.50 mm for group A and 4.51 +/- 1.37 mm for group B. The mean amount of postsurgical relapse was 0.98 +/- 1.27 mm for group A and 0.30 +/- 1.04 mm for group B. Group A patients experienced 93% of their relapse (0.92 mm) during fixation, while group B patients experienced 96% of their relapse (0.29 mm) after release of fixation. RMF provided better stability than SRMF for all maxillary landmarks in the vertical plane. All considered points both in horizontal and vertical plane exhibited full equivalence for 95% confidence intervals, which seems to indicate equivalent stability between the surgical procedures.     

Skeletal stability of Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with isolated cleft palate and bilateral cleft lip and palate

The skeletal stability of Le Fort I osteotomy was evaluated retrospectively in 14 patients with isolated cleft palate (CP, mean age 27.2 years) and 11 patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP, mean age 23.7 years). The osteotomy was fixed with titanium plates and the osteotomy gap was grafted with autologous bone. Neither intermaxillary fixation nor occlusal splints were used postoperatively. Skeletal stability was analysed both horizontally and vertically by cephalograms taken shortly before operation, immediately afterwards, and at six months and at one year postoperatively. In the CP group the mean maxillary horizontal advancement (point A) was 4.7 mm (range 0.3-7.8) and the mean vertical lengthening 3.6 mm (range 0.7-6.1). One year postoperatively the mean relapse was 8.5% (0.4 mm) horizontally and 16.7% (0.6 mm) vertically. In the BCLP group the mean horizontal advancement was 5.3 mm (range 0.2-10.7) and the mean vertical lengthening 7.3 mm (range 0.6-11.8). The mean postoperative relapse was 9.4% (0.5 mm) horizontally and 17.8% (1.3 mm) vertically. The skeletal stability and relapse were similar in both cleft types although BCLP patients had more residual cleft problems and their mean surgical advancement was greater. There was great individual variation.     

Influence of routine bone grafting on the stability of the non-cleft Le Fort 1 osteotomy

Although bone grafting is known to improve stability after midface cleft osteotomy, it is advocated only rarely for people without clefts. To assess the influence of routine bone grafting on stability in such patients we analysed radiographic data of 112 patients retrospectively. All patients had had Le Fort 1 osteotomy with autogenous bone grafts harvested by trephine from the iliac crest, and 76 had had concurrent mandibular procedures. Rigid internal fixation was adopted throughout. Impaction proved to be the most stable move. While there was little postoperative relapse of the anterior maxilla (0.9%), the posterior maxilla tended to move further upwards with time (2.3%). Overall relapse after advancement and inferior repositioning was low (3.5% and 5%, respectively). The only complication noted at the iliac crest donor site was spread of the scar, which affected three patients. When we compared these results with previously published data, they suggested that in patients without clefts rigid internal fixation combined with bone grafting may improve stability after selected Le Fort 1 osteotomy moves.     

Relapse-related factors of Le Fort I osteotomy in cleft lip and palate patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

A systematic review search was based on the PICOS approach, as follows: population: cleft lip and palate patients; intervention: Le Fort I osteotomy; comparator: different surgical protocols; outcome: stability, recurrence or surgical complications; study designs: only case reports were excluded from the review. No restrictions were placed on language or year of publication. Risk of bias was analyzed, heterogeneity was assessed, and subgroup analysis was performed using a level of significance of 1% (p = 0.01).The search identified 248 citations, from which 29 studies were selected and a total of 797 patients enrolled. The level of agreement between the authors was considered excellent (k = 0.810 for study selection and k = 0.941 for study eligibility). Our results reported a mean maxillary advancement of 5.69 mm, a mean vertical downward/upward of 2.85/−2.02 mm and a mean clockwise rotation of 4.15°. Greater surgical relapse rates were reported for vertical downward movement (−1.13 mm, 39.6%), followed by clockwise rotation (−1.41°, 33.9%), sagittal (−0.99 mm, 17.4%) and vertical upward (0.11 mm, 5.4%) movements. No relevance was found regarding the type of cleft, the type of Le Fort I osteotomy, concomitant bone grafting, surgical overcorrection, postoperative rigid or elastic intermaxillary fixation, or retention splint.Study limitations were heterogeneity and the low number of high-quality studies. In spite of reported high relapse rates, Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary reposition is the first-choice procedure for selected cleft lip and palate patients in whom extensive maxillary movements are not required, because of its safety and its three-dimensional movement versatility in one-step surgery. Otherwise, distraction osteogenesis should be considered as the gold standard treatment.     

A pilot study of the effects of transpalatal maxillary advancement on velopharyngeal closure in cleft palate patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Impaired velopharyngeal closure function is sometimes a complication of a standard Le Fort I maxillary advancement in cleft palate patients. The transpalatal Le Fort I osteotomy has been suggested as an alternative technique that may avoid this problem. The aim of this pilot study was to examine the effects of the transpalatal approach on velopharyngeal function in a series of cleft palate patients. PATIENTS: Sixteen consecutive patients with a history of cleft palate exhibiting maxillary hypoplasia who underwent a transpalatal Le Fort I osteotomy. METHODS: All patients had a simultaneous audio/video speech recording and nasopharyngoscopy examination prior to maxillary advancement, followed by a repeat of the same examinations at least 1 year post-operatively. Velopharyngeal function was measured in two ways: by direct observation using nasopharyngoscopy, and indirectly by means of perceptual assessment. Reliability studies of the two measures were performed with satisfactory results. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between the pre- and post-operative data in either the perceptual speech assessment or nasopharyngoscopy examination. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that maxillary advancement by transpalatal Le Fort I osteotomy does not adversely affect velopharyngeal closure function.     

Velopharyngeal anatomy and maxillary advancement.

This study was undertaken to evaluate the radiographic changes in the static velopharyngeal mechanism following total maxillary advancement. Records of 21 patients treated for maxillary retrusion were evaluated. Two groups were present: 13 non-cleft patients and 8 cleft-lip patients. The findings demonstrate an anatomical change in the velopharyngeal mechanism following total maxillary advancement. A similar change occurred in both groups; however, the magnitude is differed. The angle of the soft palate to hard palate increased with surgery (2 degrees per mm. advancement noncleft and 1 degree per mm. cleft). An increase in soft palate length was also seen (.5mm. per mm. advancement non-cleft and .4 mm. per mm. cleft). A pharyngeal need ratio prediction method was established (pharyngeal depth/soft palate length). A ratio of .68--.84 in this study was observed. A ratio greater than one was found to indicate probable velopharyngeal incompetence.     

Skeletal relapse of maxillary osteotomies in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients

The outcomes of a consecutive series of 10 adults who had unilateral cleft lip and palate and who had undergone Le Fort I advancement fixed with miniplates were investigated. The amount and timing of horizontal and vertical relapse, the correlation between advancement and relapse, and the effectiveness of various methods of internal fixation were analyzed with respect to the authors' clinical experience and the data from the international literature. Tracings of the preoperative and serial postoperative lateral cephalograms--taken immediately and during the 1 1/2 to 2 postoperative years--were analyzed to calculate horizontal and vertical maxillary change. We found that the use of rigid fixation is associated with a significantly more stable postoperative result, as described by other authors. Our study suggests that this useful technique does not eliminate but reduces and controls the problem of relapse in a series of unilateral cleft lip and palate adult patients undergoing Le Fort I osteotomy.     

Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures

The aim of this study was to evaluate the skeletal stability and time course of postoperative changes after surgical correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. Combined maxillary and mandibular procedures were performed in 40 consecutive patients. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy stabilized with wire osteosynthesis for mandibular setback and low-level Le Fort I osteotomy stabilized with plates and screws for maxillary advancement were performed. Maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) was in place for 6 weeks. Lateral cephalograms were taken before surgery, immediately postoperatively, 8 weeks after surgery, and 1 year postoperatively. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to vertical maxillary movement at surgery: a maxilla-up group with upward movement of the posterior nasal spine of 2 mm or more (group 1, n = 22), and a minimal vertical change group with less than 2 mm of vertical repositioning (group 2, n = 18). The results indicate that surgical correction of Class III malocclusion with combined maxillary and mandibular osteotomies appears to be fairly stable. One year postsurgery, maxillary stability was excellent, with a mean horizontal relapse at point A that represented 10.7% of maxillary advancement in group 1 and 13.4% in group 2. In the vertical plane, maxillary stability was also excellent, with a mean of 0.18 mm of superior repositioning at point A for group 1 and 1.19 mm for group 2. The mandible relapsed a mean of 2.97 mm horizontally at pogonion in group 1 (62% of mandibular setback) and 3.41 mm (49.7% of setback) in group 2. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with wire osteosynthesis and MMF was not as stable as maxillary advancement and accounted for most of the total horizontal relapse (almost 85%) observed. A trend to relapse was observed for maxillary advancement greater than 6 mm, while the single variable accounting for mandibular relapse in group 1 was the amount of surgical setback. Clockwise rotation of the ascending ramus at surgery was not correlated with mandibular relapse in relation to the type of fixation performed and therefore does not seem to be responsible for relapse.     

Long-term results in maxillary deficiency using intraoral devices

Cleft lip and palate patients often present maxillary retrusion and class III malocclusion after cleft repair. Maxillary distraction is a technique that can provide simultaneous skeletal advancement and expansion of soft tissue. Twelve patients with cleft maxillary deficiency due to cleft lip and palate were treated by Le Fort I osteotomy and two intraoral distraction devices that were activated after 4 days of latency period, 1mm per day on both sides. Long-term clinical and cephalometric evaluation of one and two years demonstrate stable results concerning the skeletal, dental and soft tissue relations. In this paper we discuss the advantages of distraction osteogenesis as a method for treatment of maxillary deficiency in cleft patients in terms of stability and relapse. The indications for maxillary distraction: (1) Moderate and severe retrusion that needs large advancement as in cleft lip and palate patients. (2) Forward and downward lengthening of the maxilla with no need for intermediate bone graft. (3) Growing patients. In conclusion, maxillary distraction in moderate or severe retrusion, as in cleft patients offers marked maxillary advancement with long-term stability.     

上颌前徙术对上颌发育不足患者腭咽部结构影响的临床探讨

目的：探讨上颌前移术对上颌发育不足患者腭咽部结构的影响。方法：选择2011-2013年行上颌Le FortI型截骨前移术的上颌发育不足患者12例,男7例,女5例,其中唇腭裂患者5例,非唇腭裂患者7例,平均年龄22．21岁,所有患者在术前、术后1月拍摄头颅定位侧位片,并对腭咽部结构指标进行测量分析。结果：上颌骨最大前移幅度8mill,最小3mm,平均前移（5．28±2．32）mm,术后咽腔深度明显增大（P〈0．05）;同时软腭长度及软硬腭夹角较术前11月显增大（P〈0．05）,软腭厚度减小。结论：上颌骨前移术造成患者咽腔深度显著增加,对腭咽闭合功能可能有不利影响：术后腭叫部软组织发生适应性变化,这种代偿性改变会在一定程度上减轻腭咽闭合不全。     

Stability after Le Fort I osteotomy in cleft lip and palate patients

Le Fort I osteotomies were performed in 20 patients with cleft lip and palate as a one-segment movement, and the fragments were fixed with miniplates without bone grafting. Tracings of preoperative and serial postoperative lateral cephalograms were used to determine changes in maxillary position. The posterior nasal spine, not subjected to extensive changes during surgical procedures and remodeling, was found to be the most reliable landmark for measuring maxillary advancement and stability. The mean maxillary advancement was 5.96 mm. Analysis did not reveal significant changes in linear and angular measurements from immediately postoperative to 6 months postoperative. A modest maxillary advancement by Le Fort I osteotomy, along with alleviation of palatal scar tissue tension and miniplate fixation, is a stable surgical method in patients with cleft lip and palate.     

Avascular necrosis in cleft maxillary repositioning: a review of cases and introduction of the ‘delayed maxillary flap’

There is a low incidence of serious complications with the Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy, but avascular necrosis is a serious problem that occurs at a higher frequency in the cleft population compared to non-cleft patients. In this retrospective study, cleft patients who had exhibited any manifestation of avascular necrosis of the maxilla following a Le Fort I advancement were identified. Five patients were found to have had vascular compromise, ranging from loss of gingival tissue to necrosis of bone and loss of teeth. In each case, possible risk factors were assessed, and secondary revision palatal surgery prior to maxillary advancement, particularly closure of oronasal fistulae with transpositional flaps, was noted to be present. Drawing on this finding and a review of the literature, clinical recommendations are made for minimizing the risk of this major complication. The use of the ‘delayed maxillary flap’ technique is introduced and described as a potentially beneficial procedure for cleft patients with a high risk of vascular compromise.     

正颌外科手术矫正唇腭裂继发颌骨畸形术后上颌稳定性的研究

目的 探讨正颌外科手术矫正唇腭裂继发颌骨畸形患者术后上颌骨的稳定性及相关影响因素.方法 34例唇腭裂继发上颌骨发育不足的患者,均行改良LeFortⅠ型截骨术前徙上颌骨,其中29例患者同期行BSSRO和/或颏成形术,术后随访时间≥12月.分别在术前、术后即刻及术后随访时拍摄头颅定位侧位片.通过头影测量分析,测量上齿槽座（A）点、后鼻嵴（PNS）点、∠SNA的变化.结果 34例患者术后1年以上（平均19个月）水平向复发率为（20.10±18.09）％;垂直向复发率为（34.78±32.89）％.∠SNA术前平均为77.9°,术后即刻为82.3°,术后1年以上为81.4°.水平向复发率与上颌骨前徙量无相关性（P＞0.05）,但垂直向的复发率与上颌骨下移量呈正相关性（P＜0.05）.通过对15例连续随访患者资料的方差分析提示,上颌骨术后复发主要发生在术后3个月内.结论 唇腭裂患者上颌骨前徙术后具有一定程度的复发,其复发主要发生在术后3个月内.垂直向的复发率与颌骨下移量成正相关.     

Le Fort I osteotomy in cleft patients: Maxillary advancement and velopharyngeal function

BackgroundMaxillary advancement may affect speech in cleft patients.AimsTo evaluate whether the amount of maxillary advancement in Le Fort I osteotomy affects velopharyngeal function (VPF) in cleft patients.MethodsNinety-three non-syndromic cleft patients (51 females, 42 males) were evaluated retrospectively. All patients had undergone a Le Fort I or bimaxillary (n = 24) osteotomy at Helsinki Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Center.Preoperative and postoperative lateral cephalometric radiographs were digitized to measure the amount of maxillary advancement. Pre- and postoperative speech was assessed perceptually and instrumentally by experienced speech therapists. Student's t-test and Mann–Whitney's U-test were used in the statistical analyses. Kappa statistics were calculated to assess reliability.ResultsThe mean advancement of A point was 4.0 mm horizontally (range: −2.8–11.3) and 3.9 mm vertically (range −14.2–3.9). Although there was a negative change in VPF, the amount of maxillary horizontal or vertical movement did not significantly influence the VPF. There was no difference between the patients with maxillary and bimaxillary osteotomy.ConclusionsThe amount of maxillary advancement does not affect the velopharyngeal function in cleft patients.     

Two-point nasomaxillary fixation of the Le Fort I osteotomy: assessment of stability at one year postoperative

The purpose was to assess maxillary position among patients undergoing Le Fort I maxillary advancement with internal fixation placed only at the nasomaxillary buttresses. This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing a Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement, with internal fixation placed only at the nasomaxillary buttresses. Demographic and cephalometric measures were recorded. The outcome of interest was the change in maxillary position between immediately postoperative (T1), 6 weeks postoperative (T2), and 1 year postoperative (T3). Fifty-eight patients were included as study subjects (32 male, 26 female; mean age 18.4 ± 1.8 years). Twenty-five subjects (43.1%) had a diagnosis of cleft lip and palate. Forty-three subjects (74.1%) had bimaxillary surgery, 16 (27.6%) had bone grafts, and 18 (31.0%) had segmental maxillary osteotomies. At T3, there were no subjects with non-union, malunion, malocclusion, or relapse requiring repeat surgery. Mean linear changes between T1 and T3 were ≤1 mm. Mean angular changes between T1 and T3 were <1°. There was no significant difference in stability in multi-segment maxillary osteotomies (P =  0.22) or with bone grafting (P =  0.31). In conclusion, anterior fixation alone in the Le Fort I osteotomy results in a stable maxillary position at 1 year postoperative.