Interim report of image-guided conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer: the William Beaumont phase II dose-escalating trial

PURPOSE: We analyzed our institution's experience treating patients with unfavorable prostate cancer in a prospective Phase II dose-escalating trial of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) integrated with conformal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boosts. This interim report discusses treatment outcome and prognostic factors using this treatment approach. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From November 1991 through February 1998, 142 patients with unfavorable prostate cancer were prospectively treated in a dose-escalating trial with pelvic EBRT in combination with outpatient HDR brachytherapy at William Beaumont Hospital. Patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >/= 10.0 ng/ml, Gleason score >/= 7, or clinical stage T2b or higher. All patients received pelvic EBRT to a median total dose of 46.0 Gy. Pelvic EBRT was integrated with ultrasound-guided transperineal conformal interstitial iridium-192 HDR implants. From 1991 to 1995, 58 patients underwent three conformal interstitial HDR implants during the first, second, and third weeks of pelvic EBRT. After October 1995, 84 patients received two interstitial implants during the first and third weeks of pelvic EBRT. The dose delivered via interstitial brachytherapy was escalated from 5.50 Gy to 6.50 Gy for each implant in those patients receiving three implants, and subsequently, from 8.25 Gy to 9.50 Gy per fraction in those patients receiving two implants. To improve implant quality and reduce operator dependency, an on-line, image-guided interactive dose optimization program was utilized during each HDR implant. No patient received hormonal therapy unless treatment failure was documented. The median follow-up was 2.1 years (range: 0.2-7.2 years). Biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel definition. RESULTS: The pretreatment PSA level was >/= 10.0 ng/ml in 51% of patients. The biopsy Gleason score was >/= 7 in 58% of cases, and 75% of cases were clinical stage T2b or higher. Despite the high frequency of these poor prognostic factors, the actuarial biochemical control rate was 89% at 2 years and 63% at 5 years. On multivariate analysis, a higher pretreatment PSA level, higher Gleason score, higher PSA nadir level, and shorter time to nadir were associated with biochemical failure. In the entire population, 14 patients (10%) experienced clinical failure at a median interval of 1.7 years (range: 0.2-4.5 years) after completing RT. The 5-year actuarial clinical failure rate was 22%. The 5-year actuarial rates of local failure and distant metastasis were 16% and 14%, respectively. For all patients, the 5-year disease-free survival, overall survival, and cause-specific survival rates were 89%, 95%, and 96%, respectively. The 5-year actuarial rate of RTOG Grade 3 late complications was 9% with no patient experiencing Grade 4 or 5 acute or late toxicity. CONCLUSION: Pelvic EBRT in combination with image-guided conformal HDR brachytherapy boosts appears to be an effective treatment for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer with minimal associated morbidity. Our dose-escalating trial will continue.     

Matched-pair analysis of conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost versus external-beam radiation therapy alone for locally advanced prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We performed a matched-pair analysis to compare our institution's experience in treating locally advanced prostate cancer with external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone to EBRT in combination with conformal interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boosts (EBRT + HDR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1991 to 1998, 161 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer were prospectively treated with EBRT + HDR at William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan. Patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible for study entry: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of >/= 10.0 ng/mL, Gleason score >/= 7, or clinical stage T2b to T3c. Pelvic EBRT (46.0 Gy) was supplemented with three (1991 through 1995) or two (1995 through 1998) ultrasound-guided transperineal interstitial iridium-192 HDR implants. The brachytherapy dose was escalated from 5.50 to 10.50 Gy per implant. Each of the 161 EBRT + HDR patients was randomly matched with a unique EBRT-alone patient. Patients were matched according to PSA level, Gleason score, T stage, and follow-up duration. The median PSA follow-up was 2.5 years for both EBRT + HDR and EBRT alone. RESULTS: EBRT + HDR patients demonstrated significantly lower PSA nadir levels (median, 0.4 ng/mL) compared with those receiving EBRT alone (median, 1.1 ng/mL). The 5-year biochemical control rates for EBRT + HDR versus EBRT-alone patients were 67% versus 44%, respectively (P <.001). On multivariate analyses, pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, T stage, and the use of EBRT alone were significantly associated with biochemical failure. Those patients in both treatment groups who experienced biochemical failure had a lower 5-year cause-specific survival rate than patients who were biochemically controlled (84% v 100%; P <.001). CONCLUSION: Locally advanced prostate cancer patients treated with EBRT + HDR demonstrate improved biochemical control compared with those who are treated with conventional doses of EBRT alone.     

HDR brachytherapy combined with external beam radiation for localised prostate cancer: early experience from the Sydney Cancer Centre

Introduction: To report the toxicity and early efficacy of high‐dose rate brachytherapy (HDR) as a boost to external beam radiation (EBRT) in the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Methods: Between December 2002 and November 2007, 101 consecutive patients with intermediate or high risk prostate cancer were treated with EBRT plus an HDR boost. The HDR boost was initially delivered in three fractions of 6.5 Gy each via one implant; this was subsequently modified to a two‐fraction technique with separate implants 2 weeks apart (8.5 Gy each). Most patients also received at least 3 months of androgen ablation. Results: Our cohort included 65 intermediate risk and 36 high‐risk patients. Sixty‐seven patients received the three‐fraction regime; 34 the two‐fraction schedule. Median follow‐up was 56 months, at which time 82% of patients were free from failure. The 4‐year disease‐free survival for intermediate and high‐risk groups was 95% and 66%, respectively (overall 85%). Significant acute toxicities included clot retention (eight patients), one traumatic urethral injury, one case of retention requiring suprapubic catheter placement, one case of new onset atrial fibrillation and three cases of pulmonary emboli. At 4 years, the rate of late grade 2 genitourinary toxicity was 8%; two patients experienced grade 3 toxicity. No late grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity was observed. Potency was preserved in 72% of those patients reporting normal pre‐treatment sexual function. Conclusions: Our cohort experienced toxicity similar to previously published HDR boost series with very promising early efficacy results.     

Lack of benefit from a short course of androgen deprivation for unfavorable prostate cancer patients treated with an accelerated hypofractionated regime

PURPOSE: High-dose radiotherapy, delivered in an accelerated hypofractionated course, was utilized to treat prostate cancer. Therapy consisted of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided conformally modulated high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. The purpose of this report is (1) to assess long-term comparative outcomes from three trials using similar accelerated hypofractionated regimes; and (2) to examine the long-term survival impact of a short course of < or =6 months adjuvant/concurrent androgen deprivation when a very high radiation dose was delivered. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1986 and 2000, 1,260 patients were treated at three institutions with pelvic EBRT (36-50 Gy) integrated with HDR prostate brachytherapy. The total dose including brachytherapy was given over 5 weeks. The biologic equivalent EBRT dose ranged between 90 and 123 Gy (median, 102 Gy) using an alpha /beta of 1.2. Patient eligibility criteria included a pretreatment prostate-specific antigen > or =10, Gleason score > or =7, or clinical stage > or =T2b. A total of 1,260 patients were treated, and 934 meet the criteria. Kiel University Hospital treated 198 patients; William Beaumont Hospital, 315; and California Endocurietherapy Cancer Center, 459 patients. Brachytherapy dose regimes were somewhat different between centers and the dose was escalated from 5.5 x 3 to 15 Gy x 2 Gy. Patients were divided for analysis between the 406 who received up to 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy and the 528 patients who did not. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 18 months (3 times the exposure to androgen deprivation therapy). The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology biochemical failure definition was used. RESULTS: Mean age was 69 years. Median follow-up time was 4.4 years (range, 1.5-14.5); 4 years for androgen deprivation therapy patients and 4.9 for radiation alone. There was no difference at 5 and 8 years in overall survival, cause-specific survival, or biochemical control among the three institutions. The corresponding 8-year rates with and without androgen deprivation therapy were biochemical control 85% and 81%; overall survival 83% and 78%; cause-specific survival 89% and 94%; and metastatic rates of 16.6% and 7.3%. A multivariate analysis revealed androgen deprivation therapy did not predict for biochemical failure for either the entire group or the subset of 177 patients harboring all three poor prognostic factors. Moreover, adding androgen deprivation therapy strongly correlated with higher rates of both metastasis (p = 0.09; hazard ratio, 2.08) and cancer-related deaths (p = 0.02, hazard ratio 3.25). These negative results for the most unfavorable group led us to question if androgen deprivation therapy might have a deleterious impact through delay in delivery of the potentially curative radiation or whether there may be a biologic basis by fixing the cycling cells in G0. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated hypofractionated pelvic EBRT integrated with TRUS-guided conformally modulated HDR administered to 1,260 patients in three institutions was an excellent method of delivering very high radiation dose to the prostate in 5 weeks. Similar high overall, cause-specific, and biochemical no evidence of disease survival rates achieved show that prostate HDR can be successfully delivered in academic and community settings. At 8 years, the addition of a course of < or =6 months of neoadjuvant/concurrent androgen deprivation therapy to a very high radiation dose did not confer a therapeutic advantage but added side effects and cost. Furthermore, for the most unfavorable group, there was a higher rate of distant metastasis and more prostate cancer-related deaths. We question the value of a short course of androgen deprivation therapy when used with high-dose radiation.     

Acute genitourinary toxicity after high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: Second analysis to determine the correlation between the urethral dose in HDR brachytherapy and the severity of acute genitourinary toxicity

PURPOSE: We have been treating localized prostate cancer with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) at our institution. We recently reported the existence of a correlation between the severity of acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity and the urethral radiation dose in HDR brachytherapy by using different fractionation schema. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of the urethral dose in the development of acute GU toxicity more closely than in previous studies. For this purpose, we conducted an analysis of patients who had undergone HDR brachytherapy with a fixed fractionation schema combined with hypofractionated EBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Among the patients with localized prostate cancer who were treated by 192-iridium HDR brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated EBRT at Gunma University Hospital between August 2000 and November 2004, we analyzed 67 patients who were treated by HDR brachytherapy with the fractionation schema of 9 Gy x two times combined with hypofractionated EBRT. Hypofractionated EBRT was administered at a fraction dose of 3 Gy three times weekly, and a total dose of 51 Gy was delivered to the prostate gland and seminal vesicles using the four-field technique. No elective pelvic irradiation was performed. After the completion of EBRT, all the patients additionally received transrectal ultrasonography-guided HDR brachytherapy. The planning target volume was defined as the prostate gland with a 5-mm margin all around, and the planning was conducted based on computed tomography images. The tumor stage was T1c in 13 patients, T2 in 31 patients, and T3 in 23 patients. The Gleason score was 2-6 in 12 patients, 7 in 34 patients, and 8-10 in 21 patients. Androgen ablation was performed in all the patients. The median follow-up duration was 11 months (range 3-24 months). The toxicities were graded based on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer toxicity criteria. RESULTS: The main symptoms of acute GU toxicity were dysuria and increase in the urinary frequency or nocturia. The grade distribution of acute GU toxicity in the patients was as follows: Grade 0-1, 42 patients (63%); Grade 2-3, 25 patients (37%). The urethral dose in HDR brachytherapy was determined using the following dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters: V30 (percentage of the urethral volume receiving 30% of the prescribed radiation dose), V80, V90, V100, V110, V120, V130, and V150. In addition, the D5 (dose covering 5% of the urethral volume), D10, D20, and D50 of the urethra were also estimated. The V30-V150 values in the patients with Grade 2-3 acute GU toxicity were significantly higher than those in patients with Grade 0-1 toxicity. The D10 and D20, but not D5 and D50, values were also significantly higher in the patients with Grade 2-3 acute GU toxicity than in those with Grade 0-1 toxicity. Regarding the influence of the number of needles implanted, there was no correlation between the number of needles implanted and the severity of acute GU toxicity or the V30-V150 values and D5-D50 values. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that HDR brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated EBRT is feasible for localized prostate cancer, when considered from the viewpoint of acute toxicity. However, because the urethral dose was closely associated with the grade of severity of the acute GU toxicity, the urethral dose in HDR brachytherapy must be kept low to reduce the severity of acute GU toxicity.     

High dose rate iridium-192 brachytherapy as a component of radical radiotherapy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer

AimsTo assess the treatment outcomes and toxicity of conformal high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost as a means of radiation dose escalation in patients with localised prostate cancer.Materials and methodsBetween December 1998 and July 2004, 65 consecutive patients with localised prostate cancer (magnetic resonance imaging-staged T1–3 N0 M0) were treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by two fractions of HDR iridium-192 brachytherapy. The patients selected this treatment modality in preference to entering an ongoing randomised phase 3 trial. Any pre-treatment serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score were included. The primary end point was biochemical disease-free progression. Late treatment-related morbidity was graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria.ResultsThe median patient age was 67.3 years (range 47.9–80). Sixty patients (92.3%) had intermediate- to high-risk disease defined by clinical stage, presenting PSA and Gleason score/World Health Organisation (WHO) grade. With a median follow-up of 3.5 years (range 0.6–5.8), two patients had died of metastatic disease and another four patients had PSA relapse, giving a 3-year actuarial biochemical disease-free progression of 90.8%. Three patients (4.6%) had acute grade 3 genitourinary toxicity, in the form of urinary retention. Late grade 3 and 4 genitourinary toxicities occurred in four patients (6.2%) and one patient (1.5%), respectively. No late gastrointestinal toxicities were observed.ConclusionsThese results suggest that the combined modality of conformal HDR brachytherapy and EBRT is a feasible treatment modality with acceptable acute and late toxicities, comparable with those of EBRT alone. It offers an attractive conformal treatment modality with the potential of further dose escalation in the treatment of localised prostate cancer.     

Acute genitourinary toxicity after high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: correlation between the urethral dose in HDR brachytherapy and the severity of acute genitourinary toxicity

PURPOSE: Several investigations have revealed that the alpha/beta ratio for prostate cancer is atypically low, and that hypofractionation or high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy regimens using appropriate radiation doses may be expected to yield tumor control and late sequelae rates that are better or at least as favorable as those achieved with conventional radiation therapy. In this setting, we attempted treating localized prostate cancer patients with HDR brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using this approach, with special emphasis on the relationship between the severity of acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity and the urethral dose calculated from the dose-volume histogram (DVH) of HDR brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between September 2000 and December 2003, 70 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated by iridium-192 HDR brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated EBRT at the Gunma University Hospital. Hypofractionated EBRT was administered in fraction doses of 3 Gy, three times per week; a total dose of 51 Gy was delivered to the prostate gland and the seminal vesicles using the four-field technique. No elective pelvic irradiation was performed. After the completion of EBRT, all the patients additionally received transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided HDR brachytherapy. The fraction size and the number of fractions in HDR brachytherapy were prospectively changed, whereas the total radiation dose for EBRT was fixed at 51 Gy. The fractionation in HDR brachytherapy was as follows: 5 Gy x 5, 7 Gy x 3, 9 Gy x 2, administered twice per day, although the biologic effective dose (BED) for HDR brachytherapy combined with EBRT, assuming that the alpha/beta ratio is 3, was almost equal to 138 in each fractionation group. The planning target volume was defined as the prostate gland with 5-mm margin all around, and the planning was conducted based on computed tomography images. The number of patients in each fractionation group was as follows: 13 in the 5-Gy group; 19 in the 7-Gy group, and 38 in the 9-Gy group. The tumor stage was T1 in 10 patients, T2 in 36 patients, and T3 in 24 patients. The Gleason score was 2-6 in 11 patients, 7 in 34 patients, and 8-10 in 25 patients. Androgen ablation was performed in all the patients. The median follow-up duration was 14 months (range 3-42 months). The toxicities were graded based on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer toxicity criteria. RESULTS: The main symptoms of acute GU toxicity were dysuria and increase in urinary frequency or nocturia. The grade distribution of acute GU toxicity in the patients was as follows: Grade 0-1, 39 patients (56%), and Grade 2-4, 31 patients (44%). One patient who developed acute urinary obstruction was classified as having Grade 4 toxicity. Comparison of the distribution of the grade of acute GU toxicity among the different fractionation groups revealed no statistically significant differences among the groups. The urethral dose in HDR brachytherapy was evaluated using the following DVH parameters: V30 (percentage of the urethral volume receiving 30% of the prescribed radiation dose), V80, V90, V100, V110, V120, V130, and V150. The V30-110 values in the patients with Grade 2-4 acute GU toxicity were significantly higher than those in patients with Grade 0-1 toxicity. On the other hand, there were no significant differences in the V120-150 values between patients with Grade 0-1 and Grade 2-4 toxicity. Regarding the influence of the number of needles implanted for the radiation therapy, patients with 11 needles or less showed a significantly higher incidence of Grade 2-4 acute GU toxicity compared with those with 12 needles or more (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that HDR brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated EBRT is feasible for localized prostate cancer when considered from the viewpoint of acute toxicity. Increase in the fraction dose or reduction in the number of fractions in HDR brachytherapy did not affect the severity of acute GU toxicity, and the volume of urethra receiving an equal or lower radiation dose than the prescribed dose was more closely associated with the grade severity of acute GU toxicity than that receiving a higher than the prescribed dose.     

Dose escalation using conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy improves outcome in unfavorable prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To overcome radioresistance for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer, a prospective trial of pelvic external beam irradiation (EBRT) interdigitated with dose-escalating conformal high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy was performed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between November 1991 and August 2000, 207 patients were treated with 46 Gy pelvic EBRT and increasing HDR brachytherapy boost doses (5.50-11.5 Gy/fraction) during 5 weeks. The eligibility criteria were pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level >or=10.0 ng/mL, Gleason score >or=7, or clinical Stage T2b or higher. Patients were divided into 2 dose levels, low-dose biologically effective dose <93 Gy (58 patients) and high-dose biologically effective dose >93 Gy (149 patients). No patient received hormones. We used the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition for biochemical failure. RESULTS: The median age was 69 years. The mean follow-up for the group was 4.4 years, and for the low and high-dose levels, it was 7.0 and 3.4 years, respectively. The actuarial 5-year biochemical control rate was 74%, and the overall, cause-specific, and disease-free survival rate was 92%, 98%, and 68%, respectively. The 5-year biochemical control rate for the low-dose group was 52%; the rate for the high-dose group was 87% (p <0.001). Improvement occurred in the cause-specific survival in favor of the brachytherapy high-dose level (p = 0.014). On multivariate analysis, a low-dose level, higher Gleason score, and higher nadir value were associated with increased biochemical failure. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 gastrointestinal/genitourinary complications ranged from 0.5% to 9%. The actuarial 5-year impotency rate was 51%. CONCLUSION: Pelvic EBRT interdigitated with transrectal ultrasound-guided real-time conformal HDR prostate brachytherapy boost is both a precise dose delivery system and a very effective treatment for unfavorable prostate cancer. We demonstrated an incremental beneficial effect on biochemical control and cause-specific survival with higher doses. These results, coupled with the low risk of complications, the advantage of not being radioactive after implantation, and the real-time interactive planning, define a new standard for treatment.     

High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as a monotherapy for localized prostate cancer: treatment description and preliminary results of a phase I/II clinical trial

PURPOSE: To improve results for localized prostate cancer, a prospective clinical trial of hyperfractionated Iridium-192 high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as a monotherapy was initiated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between May 1995 and September 1998, 22 implants were performed on 22 patients with localized prostate cancer (T1:T2:T3:T4 = 4:6:9:3) at Osaka University Hospital. Nineteen patients, who had T3-T4 tumors or pretreatment PSA >/= 20.0 ng/mL, received hormone therapy. No patient had external beam radiation. Transperineal needle implants using real-time ultrasound guidance were performed, followed by dose optimization program. Patients were irradiated twice a day, with a time interval of more than 6 h. Total dose was 48 Gy/8 fractions/5 days or 54 Gy/9 fractions/5 days. Acute toxicity was scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) radiation morbidity scoring criteria. Median follow-up time was 31 months. RESULTS: HDR brachytherapy as a monotherapy was well-tolerated. No significant intra- or peri-operative complications occurred. No patient experienced acute toxicity of grade 3 or more. PSA levels normalized in 95% of patients within 20 months after irradiation. Four-year clinical and biochemical relapse-free rates were 95% and 55%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Acute toxicity with this method was acceptable. Further patient accrual and longer follow-up will allow comparison to other techniques.     

Feasibility of high-dose-rate brachytherapy salvage for local prostate cancer recurrence after radiotherapy: the University of California-San Francisco experience

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of salvage high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively analyzed 21 consecutively accrued patients undergoing salvage HDR brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after EBRT between November 1998 and December 2005. After pathologic confirmation of locally recurrent disease, all patients were treated with 36 Gy in six fractions using two transrectal ultrasound-guided HDR prostate implants, separated by 1 week. Eleven patients received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy immediately presalvage, whereas none received adjuvant hormonal therapy postsalvage. Median follow-up time from recurrence was 18.7 months (range, 6-84 months). Determination of subsequent biochemical failure after brachytherapy was based on the definition by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology. RESULTS: Based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 3), 18 patients reported Grade 1 to 2 genitourinary symptoms by 3 months postsalvage. Three patients developed Grade 3 genitourinary toxicity. Maximum observed gastrointestinal toxicity was Grade 2; all cases spontaneously resolved. The 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimate of biochemical control after recurrence was 89%. Thirteen patients have achieved a PSA nadir < or =0.1 ng/ml, but at the time of writing this endpoint has not yet been reached for all patients. All patients are alive; however 2 have experienced biochemical failure, both with PSA nadirs > or =1, and have subsequently been found to have distant metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage HDR prostate brachytherapy appears to be feasible and effective.     

Brachytherapy: Current Status and Future Strategies — Can High Dose Rate Replace Low Dose Rate and External Beam Radiotherapy?

Brachytherapy delivers the most conformal high dose radiotherapy possible to the prostate, using either a low dose rate (LDR) or high dose rate (HDR) technique. It may be used either alone as monotherapy or in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) as a local boost. Comparative efficacy studies, including one randomised controlled trial, consistently show higher cancer control rates when brachytherapy is used compared with EBRT alone, with even some evidence of improvement in survival. There are now extensive mature data supporting the use of LDR as monotherapy for patients with low-risk and selected intermediate-risk disease, with most series reporting long-term disease control rates of over 90% after high-quality implants. HDR is most commonly combined with EBRT to treat intermediate- and high-risk disease, with disease control rates of over 90% reported. The low alpha/beta ratio of prostate cancer combined and the ability to optimally sculpt dose distribution provides the biological and dosimetric rationale for HDR. HDR enables more consistent implant quality than LDR, with evidence of lower acute and late toxicity. Many dose and fractionation schedules of HDR in combination with EBRT have been investigated, but a single fraction of 10–15 Gy is commonly combined with EBRT to a dose of 40–50 Gy to treat intermediate- and high-risk disease. High disease control rates are also reported with HDR as monotherapy, particularly in patients with low- and intermediate-risk disease. Although older series have delivered four to six fractions of HDR, there is growing evidence to support the delivery of HDR in three or even two fractions. Single-fraction HDR monotherapy is now being investigated and if early data are confirmed with longer follow-up, may well become the treatment of choice for many men with localised prostate cancer.     

Anatomy-based inverse planning dose optimization in HDR prostate implant: a toxicity study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the acute and late complications in patients who have received HDR implant boost using inverse planning, and to determine dose volume correlations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 1999 and October 2002, 44 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (PSA>/=10 ng/ml, and/or Gleason score>/=7, and/or Stage T2c or higher) were treated with 40-45 Gy external pelvic field followed by 2--3 fraction of inverse-planned HDR implant boost (6--9.5 Gy /fraction). Median follow-up time was 1.7 years with 81.8% of patients who had at least 12 months of follow up (range 8.6--42.5. Acute and late morbidity data were collected and graded according to RTOG criteria. Questionnaires were used to collect prostate related measures of quality of life, and international prostate symptom score (IPSS) before and after treatment. Dose-volume histograms for prostate, urethra, bladder, penis bulb and rectum were analyzed. RESULTS: The median patient age was 64 years. Of these, 32% were in the high risk group, and 61% in the intermediate risk group. 3 patients (7%) had no adverse prognostic factors. A single grade 3 GU acute toxicity was reported but no grade 3--4 acute GI toxicity. No grade 3--4 late GU or GI toxicity was reported. Acute (late) grade 2 urinary and rectal symptoms were reported in 31.8 (11.4%) and 4.6% (4.6%) of patients, respectively. A trend for predicting acute GU toxicity is seen for total HDR dose of more than 18 Gy (OR=3.6, 95%CI=[0.96--13.5], P=0.058). The evolution of toxicity is presented for acute and late GU/GI toxicity. Erectile dysfunction occurs in approximately 27% of patients who were not on hormonal deprivation, but may be taking sildenafil. The IPSS peaked on averaged 6 weeks post-implant and returned to the baseline at a median of 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Inverse-planned HDR brachytherapy is a viable option to deliver higher dose to the prostate as a boost without increasing GU or rectal complication. Further HDR dose escalation to the prostate is feasible.     

Clinical outcome in patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy and high dose-rate iridium 192 brachytherapy boost: a 6-year follow-up

To report the long-term results for treatment of localized carcinoma of the prostate using high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy, conformal external beam radiotherapy (3D EBRT) and neo-adjuvant hormonal therapy (TAB). From 1998 through 1999, 154 patients with localized prostate cancer were entered in the trial. Biologically no evidence of disease (bNED) was defined at PSA levels < 2 microg/l. In order to compare the results of this treatment with other treatment modalities, the patient's pre-treatment data were used to calculate the estimated 5-year PSA relapse free survival using Kattan's nomograms for radical prostatectomy (RP) and 3D EBRT. After 6 years of follow-up, 129 patients remain alive. The actual 5-year relapse-free survival is 84%. None of the patients demonstrated clinical signs of local recurrence. The median PSA at follow-up among the relapse-free patients was 0.05 microg/l. Among the 80 patients who presented with clinical stage T3 tumours, 55 (68%) were relapse-free. The expected 5-year relapse-free survival using nomograms for RP and 3D EBRT was 54% and 70%, respectively. Late rectal toxicity RTOG grade 3 occurred in 1% of the patients. Late urinary tract toxicity RTOG grade 3 developed in 4% of the patients. Combined treatment, utilizing HDR, 3D EBRT and TAB, produces good clinical results. Rectal toxicity is acceptable. Urinary tract toxicity, most likely can be explained by the fact that during the first years of this treatment, no effort was made to localize the urethra, which was assumed to be in the middle of the prostate.     

Dose-volume impact in high-dose-rate Iridium-192 brachytherapy as a boost to external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer--a phase II study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Evaluation of dose-volume-time-related factors in 64 patients treated with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) as a boost to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical parameters were correlated with morbidity scores of the EPIC (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index) questionnaire. Median time after radiotherapy (HDR-BT up to 18 Gy in two fractions and EBRT up to a median dose of 50.4 Gy) was 1.5 and 3 years (first and second questionnaire). RESULTS: A significant impact of a urethra D1 exceeding 15 Gy in at least one HDR fraction concerning urinary morbidity and a rectum D1 exceeding 6 Gy to the rectal mucosa in the first and second HDR fraction concerning the rectal bleeding rate was found. A higher number of needles was associated with lower urinary and bowel scores after 1.5 years. A prostate length >4.8 cm and a longer duration of EBRT (independently of the dose) predisposed for lower urinary and bowel scores. In contrast to a urethra D1 > 15 Gy as an independent factor, a rectum D1 > 6 Gy per HDR fraction correlated with a higher number of needles and an increased prostate length. CONCLUSIONS: To minimize morbidity in HDR-BT for prostate cancer, a maximum dose to the urethra of 15 Gy and a maximum dose to the rectal mucosa of 6 Gy is advisable. Treatment- and patient-related factors have a major impact on toxicity.     

Adjuvant androgen deprivation impacts late rectal toxicity after conformal radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma

To evaluate whether androgen deprivation impacts late rectal toxicity in patients with localised prostate carcinoma treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. One hundred and eighty-two consecutive patients treated with 3DCRT between 1995 and 1999 at our Institution and with at least 12 months follow-up were analysed. three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy consisted in 70-76 Gy delivered with a conformal 3-field arrangement to the prostate+/-seminal vesicles. As part of treatment, 117 patients (64%) received neo-adjuvant and concomitant androgen deprivation while 88 (48.4%) patients were continued on androgen deprivation at the end of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy as well. Late rectal toxicity was graded according to the RTOG morbidity scoring scale. Median follow up is 25.8 (range: 12-70.2 months). The 2-year actuarial likelihood of grade 2-4 rectal toxicity was 21.8+/-3.2%. A multivariate analysis identified the use of adjuvant androgen deprivation (P=0.0196) along with the dose to the posterior wall of the rectum on the central axis (P=0.0055) and the grade of acute rectal toxicity (P=0.0172) as independent predictors of grade 2-4 late rectal toxicity. The 2-year estimates of grade 2-4 late rectal toxicity for patients receiving or not adjuvant hormonal treatment were 30.3+/-5.2% and 14.1+/-3.8%, respectively. Rectal tolerance is reduced in presence of adjuvant androgen deprivation.     

A Prospective Study of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Focal Salvage High-dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer: Updated Results of 30 Patients

PurposeLimited prospective data on focal salvage high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy is available. We sought to explore the toxicities, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and efficacy of focal salvage HDR brachytherapy in a prospective clinical trial. This report presents the updated results of previously published data.Methods and MaterialsPatients with locally recurrent prostate cancer after previous external beam radiation therapy and/or brachytherapy were enrolled. Patients received magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided, ultrasound-based focal HDR brachytherapy delivered over 2 fractions of 13.5 Gy delivered 1 to 2 weeks apart. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was not used.ResultsThirty patients were treated between 2012 and 2019. At a median follow-up time of 39 months, the 3-year biochemical failure-free rate was 61.8% (95% confidence interval, 44.0%-86.6%), and the 3-year ADT/salvage therapy-free rate was 86.0% (95% confidence interval, 74.1%-99.8%). Seventeen patients experienced subsequent biochemical failure, 9 received ADT and/or further local salvage, and no patients died of prostate cancer. Of the 28 patients who had posttreatment MRI, 26 had a local treatment response. No acute grade ≥3 genitourinary/gastrointestinal toxicity was observed. One temporary late grade 3 genitourinary toxicity event occurred, but no late grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicity was seen. No significant decline in urinary or bowel HRQoL was observed.ConclusionsFocal salvage HDR brachytherapy has a favorable side effect profile, no significant decline in HRQoL, and the 3-year biochemical control rates are in line with those of other salvage options. Early MRI response at the treated site is common, but does not preclude subsequent biochemical failure.     

Combination external beam radiation and brachytherapy boost with androgen deprivation for treatment of intermediate-risk prostate cancer: long-term results of CALGB 99809

BACKGROUND:

Combined transperineal prostate brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is widely used for treatment of prostate cancer. Long‐term efficacy and toxicity results of a multicenter phase 2 trial assessing combination of EBRT and transperineal prostate brachytherapy boost with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for intermediate‐risk prostate cancer are presented.

METHODS:

Intermediate‐risk patients per Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center/National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria received 6 months of ADT, and 45 grays (Gy) EBRT to the prostate and seminal vesicles, followed by transperineal prostate brachytherapy with I¹²⁵ (100 Gy) or Pd¹⁰³ (90 Gy). Toxicity was graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 2 and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group late radiation morbidity scoring systems. Disease‐free survival (DFS) was defined as time from enrollment to progression (biochemical, local, distant, or prostate cancer death). In addition to the protocol definition of biochemical failure (3 consecutive prostate‐specific antigen rises >1.0 ng/mL after 18 months from treatment start), the 1997 American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus and Phoenix definitions were also assessed in defining DFS. The Kaplan‐Meier method was used to estimate DFS and overall survival.

RESULTS:

Sixty‐one of 63 enrolled patients were eligible. Median follow‐up was 73 months. Late grade 2 and 3 toxicity, excluding sexual dysfunction, occurred in 20% and 3% of patients. Six‐year DFS applying the protocol definition, 1997 ASTRO consensus, and Phoenix definitions was 87.1%, 75.1%, and 84.9%. Six deaths occurred; only 1 was attributed to prostate cancer. Six‐year overall survival was 96.1%.

CONCLUSIONS:

In a cooperative setting, combination of EBRT and transperineal prostate brachytherapy boost plus ADT resulted in excellent DFS with acceptable late toxicity for patients with intermediate‐risk prostate cancer. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Results of low- and high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for T3 mobile tongue cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the treatment results of low-dose-rate (LDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) for T3 mobile tongue cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1974 and 1992, 61 patients with T3 mobile tongue cancer were treated with LDR ISBT using (192)Ir hairpins with or without single pins. In addition, between 1991 and 1999, 14 patients were treated with HDR ISBT. For nine patients treated with ISBT alone, the total dose was 59-94 Gy (median 72 Gy) within one week in LDR ISBT and 60 Gy/10 fractions/5 days in HDR ISBT. For 66 patients treated with a combination therapy of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and ISBT, the total dose was 12.5-60 Gy (median 30 Gy) of EBRT and 50-112 Gy (median 68 Gy) within 1 week in LDR ISBT or 32-60 Gy (median 48 Gy)/8-10 fractions/5-7 days in HDR ISBT. RESULTS: The 2- and 3-year local control rates of all patients were both 68%. The 2- and 3-year local control rates of patients treated with LDR ISBT were both 67%, and those with HDR ISBT were both 71%. The local control rate of patients treated with HDR ISBT was similar to those with LDR ISBT. CONCLUSIONS: ISBT for T3 mobile tongue cancer is effective and acceptable. The treatment result of HDR ISBT is almost similar to that of LDR ISBT for T3 mobile tongue cancer.     

单管式子宫颈癌后装施源器前瞻性随机对照Ⅱ期临床研究近期疗效

目的 观察自主研发的单管式子宫颈癌后装施源器与标准Fletcher三管施源器的临床疗效以及安全性。 方法 选取 2011-2017年就诊的子宫颈癌初诊患者,随机分为外照射+单管式后装组(专利单管组)和外照射+ Fletcher三管式后装组。外照射采用6 MV X线四野盒式或前后对穿野照射,30 Gy后改野挡铅行后装治疗,1 次/周,剂量为A点7 Gy,共 5~6次(A点生物等效剂量:80~90 Gy)。外照射时同步使用顺铂(40 mg/m²)化疗,1 次/周,治疗结束随访其疗效及不良反应并对比。 结果 符合入组条件并完成治疗,Fletcher三管组 150例,专利单管组 149例。两组近期疗效以及急性期不良反应相近(P>0.05)。Fletcher三管组有效率为94.0%,专利单管组为94.7%。≥3级急性期血液学不良反应,Fletcher三管组为 76例(50.7%),专利单管组为 61例(40.9%)(P=0.195)。 结论 专利单管式子宫颈癌后装施源器与标准Fletcher三管施源器近期疗效相当,且急性期不良反应相似。     

Use of three-dimensional radiation therapy planning tools and intraoperative ultrasound to evaluate high dose rate prostate brachytherapy implants

PURPOSE: We performed a pilot study to evaluate the quality of high dose rate (HDR) prostate implants using a new technique combining intraoperative real-time ultrasound images with a commercially available 3-dimensional radiation therapy planning (3D RTP) system. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty HDR prostate implants performed by four different physicians on a phase I/II protocol were evaluated retrospectively. Radiation therapy (RT) consisted of pelvic external beam RT (EBRT) to a dose of 46 Gy in 2-Gy fractions over 5 weeks and 2 HDR implants (prescribed dose of 950 cGy per implant). Our in-house real-time geometric optimization technique was used in all patients. Each HDR treatment was delivered without moving the patient. Ultrasound image sets were acquired immediately after needle placement and just prior to HDR treatment. The ultrasound image sets, needle and source positions and dwell times were imported into a commercial computerized tomography (CT) based 3D RTP system. Prostate contours were outlined manually caudad to cephalad. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the prostate were evaluated for each implant. RESULTS: Four patients with stage T2a carcinoma, 4 with stage T2b, and 3 with stage T1c were studied. The median number of needles used per implant was 16 (range 14-18). The median treated volume of the implant (volume of tissue covered by the 100% isodose surface) was 82.6 cc (range 52.6-96.3 cc). The median target volume based on the contours entered in the 3D RTP system was 44.83 cc (range 28.5-67.45 cc). The calculated minimum dose to the target volume was 70% of the prescribed dose (range 45-97%). On average 92% of the target volume received the prescribed dose (range 75-99 %). The mean homogeneity index (fraction of the target volume receiving between 1.0 to 1.5 times the prescribed dose) was 80% or 0.8 (range 0.55-0.9). These results compare favorably to recent studies of permanent implants which report a minimum target volume dose of 43% (range 29-50%) and an average of 85% of the target volume (range 76-92%) receiving the prescribed dose. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of evaluating HDR prostate implants using ultrasound images (acquired immediately prior to treatment) with a commercially available 3D RTP system was established. The dosimetric characteristics of these HDR implants appear to be substantially different compared to permanent implants. These developments allow quantitative evaluation of the dosimetric quality of HDR prostate treatments. Future studies will examine any correlation between the dosimetric quality of the implant and clinical/biochemical outcomes.