Current management of fungal infections

The management of superficial fungal infections differs significantly from the management of systemic fungal infections. Most superficial infections are treated with topical antifungal agents, the choice of agent being determined by the site and extent of the infection and by the causative organism, which is usually readily identifiable. One exception is onychomycosis, which usually requires treatment with systemically available antifungals; the accumulation of terbinafine and itraconazole in keratinous tissues makes them ideal agents for the treatment of onychomycosis. Oral candidiasis in immunocompromised patients also requires systemic treatment; oral fluconazole and itraconazole oral solution are highly effective in this setting. Systemic fungal infections are difficult to diagnose and are usually managed with prophylaxis or empirical therapy. Fluconazole and itraconazole are widely used in chemoprophylaxis because of their favourable oral bioavailability and safety profiles. In empirical therapy, lipid-associated formulations of amphotericin-B and intravenous itraconazole are safer than, and at least as effective as, conventional amphotericin-B (the former gold standard). The high acquisition costs of the lipid-associated formulations of amphotericin-B have limited their use.     

The cost of treating systemic fungal infections

The increasing incidence of systemic fungal infections and rising medical costs have highlighted the need for an economic appraisal of antifungal agents to determine the most cost-effective therapeutic option. Cost savings derived from the prophylactic or empirical use of antifungal agents have been difficult to estimate because of the lack of information on the costs of systemic fungal infections. Fluconazole is effective in prophylaxis and represents a direct cost saving compared with polyenes. However, itraconazole oral solution, an effective and widely used antifungal prophylactic agent, has not been analysed for cost effectiveness. In empirical therapy, the development of new formulations of existing agents has prompted a number of cost comparisons. In particular, the cost of treatment with conventional amphotericin-B has been compared with the costs of the new lipid-associated formulations of amphotericin-B or the new intravenous (IV) formulation of itraconazole. The acquisition costs of lipid-associated amphotericin-B and IV itraconazole are higher than the cost of conventional amphotericin-B; however, these costs appear to be offset by reductions with both these agents in the cost for increased length of hospital stay and treating adverse events seen with conventional amphotericin-B. In neutropenic patients and bone marrow transplant recipients, IV itraconazole may be the most cost-effective option for empirical therapy.     

Clinical experience with itraconazole in systemic fungal infections

The broad spectrum antifungal itraconazole is an effective and well tolerated agent for the prophylaxis and treatment of systemic fungal infections. The recent development of an itraconazole oral solution and an intravenous itraconazole solution has increased the options for the use of this drug and increased the oral bioavailability in a variety of at-risk patients. Reliable absorption of the itraconazole oral solution has been demonstrated in patients with HIV infection, neutropenic patients with haematological malignancy, bone marrow transplant recipients and neutropenic children. In clinical trials, itraconazole oral solution (5 mg/kg/day) was more effective at preventing systemic fungal infection in patients with haematological malignancy than placebo, fluconazole suspension (100 mg/day) or oral amphotericin-B (2 g/kg/day) and was highly effective at preventing fungal infections in liver transplant recipients. There were no unexpected adverse events with the itraconazole oral solution in any of these trials. In addition, intravenous itraconazole solution is at least as effective as intravenous amphotericin-B in the empirical treatment of neutropenic patients with systemic fungal infections, and drug-related adverse events are more frequent in patients treated with amphotericin-B. A large proportion of patients with confirmed aspergillosis also respond to treatment with intravenous itraconazole followed by oral itraconazole. The new formulations of itraconazole are therefore effective agents for prophylaxis and treatment of most systemic fungal infections in patients with haematological malignancy.     

Pharmacology of itraconazole

Itraconazole is a triazole antifungal agent that has a broad spectrum of activity and is well tolerated. Itraconazole is highly efficacious, particularly because its main metabolite, hydroxy-itraconazole, also has considerable antifungal activity. The original capsule formulation of itraconazole may lead to variability in absorption and the plasma concentration. For the treatment of superficial fungal infections, this is not problematical because itraconazole accumulates at the infection site, making consistently high plasma concentrations unnecessary -- a characteristic that has been exploited in the development of a pulse regimen. Because consistent plasma concentrations are critical for the more serious systemic fungal infections, variable absorption of itraconazole from the capsules limits their application. Moreover, underlying disease processes and medical interventions can reduce absorption from the capsules in some patients with systemic fungal infections. To widen the beneficial application of itraconazole to include such patients, an oral solution and an intravenous formulation were developed. These formulations combine lipophilic itraconazole with hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin, a ring of substituted glucose molecules, which improves the solubility of itraconazole. The enhanced absorption and bioavailability of itraconazole from these new formulations make them ideal for the treatment of systemic fungal infections in a wide range of patient populations. The additional flexibility offered by the different routes of administration also means that itraconazole can be used in patients at high risk, such as children or those requiring intensive care, for whom the capsule formulation may be impractical.     

伊曲康唑在侵袭性真菌感染中的预防作用

由于免疫抑制剂的使用、血液系统恶性肿瘤病人异基因造血干细胞移植等高危人群的不断增多,侵袭性真菌感染的患病率和病死率均呈显著上升趋势。近年来伊曲康唑口服液和注射液相继在欧美及我国批准使用,对于高危病人伊曲康唑的预防性应用能显著降低侵袭性真菌感染的发生率。因此,本文拟从循证医学的角度,对伊曲康唑口服液和注射液在各种危重病病人侵袭性真菌感染中的预防作用作一综述。     

New investigational antifungal agents for treating invasive fungal infections

Systemic fungal infections have been recognised as a major cause of morbidity and mortality during the last two decades. There are only a few therapeutic options for these infections. Severe toxicity, such as impairment of renal function, limits the use of amphotericin B. Flucytosine is associated with side effects and drug resistance. Fluconazole and itraconazole are safer, though emergence of resistance and innate resistance in some fungal pathogens is a concern in their use. Therefore, there is a need for developing novel drugs and/or treatment strategies to combat these infections. In recent years, increased efforts by the pharmaceutical industry and academia have led to the discovery of new re-engineered or reconsidered antifungal agents that are more efficacious, safer and have a broad spectrum of activity. Lipid formulations of polyene antifungal agents, amphotericin B and nystatin, have the advantage of improved therapeutic index. Activity against resistant fungi, high bioavailability, safety and longer half-life are the properties that encourage development of the newer triazoles (e.g., voriconazole, ravuconazole and posaconazole). Echinocandin-like lipopeptide antibiotics are among the antifungal agents with a novel mode of action. In addition to these lead investigational compounds, development of newer antifungal agents is underway.     

New investigational antifungal agents for treating invasive fungal infections

Systemic fungal infections have been recognised as a major cause of morbidity and mortality during the last two decades. There are only a few therapeutic options for these infections. Severe toxicity, such as impairment of renal function, limits the use of amphotericin B. Flucytosine is associated with side effects and drug resistance. Fluconazole and itraconazole are safer, though emergence of resistance and innate resistance in some fungal pathogens is a concern in their use. Therefore, there is a need for developing novel drugs and/or treatment strategies to combat these infections. In recent years, increased efforts by the pharmaceutical industry and academia have led to the discovery of new re-engineered or reconsidered antifungal agents that are more efficacious, safer and have a broad spectrum of activity. Lipid formulations of polyene antifungal agents, amphotericin B and nystatin, have the advantage of improved therapeutic index. Activity against resistant fungi, high bioavailability, safety and longer half-life are the properties that encourage development of the newer triazoles (e.g., voriconazole, ravuconazole and posaconazole). Echinocandin-like lipopeptide antibiotics are among the antifungal agents with a novel mode of action. In addition to these lead investigational compounds, development of newer antifungal agents is underway.     

Voriconazole : a review of its use in the management of invasive fungal infections

Voriconazole (VFEND), a synthetic second-generation, broad-spectrum triazole derivative of fluconazole, inhibits the cytochrome P450 (CYP)-dependent enzyme 14-alpha-sterol demethylase, thereby disrupting the cell membrane and halting fungal growth. In the US, intravenous and/or oral voriconazole is recommended in adults for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis, candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients, disseminated infections caused by Candida spp., oesophageal candidiasis, and in patients with scedosporiosis and fusariosis who are refractory to or intolerant of other antifungal therapy. In Europe, intravenous and/or oral voriconazole is recommended in adults and paediatric patients of at least 2 years of age for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis, candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients, fluconazole-resistant serious invasive Candida spp. infections, scedosporiosis and fusariosis.In large randomised trials, voriconazole was an effective and generally well tolerated primary treatment for candidiasis and invasive aspergillosis in adults and adolescents. More limited data also support the use of voriconazole for the treatment of invasive fungal infections in children, in those with rare fungal infections, such as Fusarium spp. or Scedosporium spp., and in those refractory to or intolerant of other standard antifungal therapies. The availability of both parenteral and oral formulations and the almost complete absorption of the drug after oral administration provide for ease of use and potential cost savings, and ensure that therapeutic plasma concentrations are maintained when switching from intravenous to oral therapy. On the other hand, the numerous drug interactions associated with voriconazole may limit its usefulness in some patients. Further clinical experience will help to more fully determine the position of voriconazole in relation to other licensed antifungal agents. In the meantime, voriconazole is a valuable emerging option for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and rare fungal infections, including Fusarium spp. and Scedosporium spp. infections, and provides an alternative option for the treatment of candidiasis, particularly where the causative organism is inherently resistant to other licensed antifungal agents.     

Novel triazole antifungal agents

The risk of opportunistic infections is greatly increased in patients who are immunocompromised due to AIDS, cancer chemotherapy and organ or bone marrow transplantation. Candida albicans is often associated with serious systemic fungal infections, however other Candida species such as Candida krusei, Candida tropicalis and Candida glabrata, as well as Cryptococcus neoformans and filamentous fungi such as Aspergillus, have also emerged as clinically significant fungal pathogens. Two triazole antifungal agents, fluconazole and itraconazole, were introduced over a decade ago and since then have been used extensively for the prophylaxis and treatment of a variety of fungal infections. Although both drugs are effective and have their place in therapy, limitations regarding the utility of these agents do exist. For example, fluconazole is not effective for the prophylaxis or treatment of Aspergillus species and has limited activity against C. krusei and C. glabrata. The use of itraconazole has been limited secondary to concerns regarding unpredictable bioavailability. The rising incidence of fungal infections and the reported increase of non-albicans candidal infections noted over the past two decades highlight the need for new antifungal agents with improved spectra of activity. Several new triazole agents are in various phases of preclinical and clinical trials and may be available for human use in the near future. Three such agents voriconazole, posaconazole and ravuconazole are reviewed and compared with existing agents.     

Novel triazole antifungal agents

The risk of opportunistic infections is greatly increased in patients who are immunocompromised due to AIDS, cancer chemotherapy and organ or bone marrow transplantation. Candida albicans is often associated with serious systemic fungal infections, however other Candida species such as Candida krusei, Candida tropicalis and Candida glabrata, as well as Cryptococcus neoformans and filamentous fungi such as Aspergillus, have also emerged as clinically significant fungal pathogens. Two triazole antifungal agents, fluconazole and itraconazole, were introduced over a decade ago and since then have been used extensively for the prophylaxis and treatment of a variety of fungal infections. Although both drugs are effective and have their place in therapy, limitations regarding the utility of these agents do exist. For example, fluconazole is not effective for the prophylaxis or treatment of Aspergillus species and has limited activity against C. krusei and C. glabrata. The use of itraconazole has been limited secondary to concerns regarding unpredictable bioavailability. The rising incidence of fungal infections and the reported increase of non-albicans candidal infections noted over the past two decades highlight the need for new antifungal agents with improved spectra of activity. Several new triazole agents are in various phases of preclinical and clinical trials and may be available for human use in the near future. Three such agents voriconazole, posaconazole and ravuconazole are reviewed and compared with existing agents.     

Standard antifungal therapy in neutropenic patients

Fungal infections are life-threatening complications in patients with prolonged neutropenia. Amphotericin B, which is fungicidal and has a broad spectrum of antifungal activity, remains the current gold standard agent. However, because of its low therapeutic index, new lipid formulations of amphotericin B have been developed with better tolerance and less toxicity. The use of 5-fluorocytosine is waning because of the medullar toxicity of this agent. Fluconazole and itraconazole are both fungistatic and are more convenient for the treatment of fungal infections in haemodynamically stable patients.     

Itraconazole: pharmacology, clinical experience and future development

Itraconazole is an orally active, broad-spectrum, triazole antifungal agent which has a higher affinity for fungal cytochrome P-450 than ketoconazole but a low affinity for mammalian cytochrome P-450. Itraconazole has a broader spectrum of activity than other azole antifungals and shows interesting pharmacokinetic features in terms of its tissue distribution. These properties have resulted in reduced treatment times for a number of diseases such as vaginal candidiasis, as well as effective oral treatment of several deep mycoses, including aspergillosis and candidiasis. Currently itraconazole is registered in 42 countries for the treatment of systemic fungal infections. Further development is concentrating on antifungal prophylaxis as well as on an oral solution and an intravenous formulation.     

Antifungal agents in neonates: issues and recommendations

Fungal infections are responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality in the neonatal period, particularly among premature neonates. Four classes of antifungal agents are commonly used in the treatment of fungal infections in pediatric patients: polyene macrolides, fluorinated pyrimidines, triazoles, and echinocandins. Due to the paucity of pediatric data, many recommendations for the use of antifungal agents in this population are derived from the experience in adults. The purpose of this article was to review the published data on fungal infections and antifungal agents, with a focus on neonatal patients, and to provide an overview of the differences in antifungal pharmacology in neonates compared with adults. Pharmacokinetic data suggest dosing differences in children versus adult patients with some antifungals, but not all agents have been fully evaluated. The available pharmacokinetic data on the amphotericin B deoxycholate formulation in neonates exhibit considerable variability; nevertheless, the dosage regimen suggested in the neonatal population is similar to that used in adults. More pharmacokinetic information is available on the liposomal and lipid complex preparations of amphotericin B and fluconazole, and it supports their use in neonates; however, the optimal dosage and duration of therapy is difficult to establish. All amphotericin-B formulations, frequently used in combination with flucytosine, are useful for treating disseminated fungal infections and Candida meningitis in neonates. Fluconazole, with potent in vitro activity against Cryptococcus neoformans and almost all Candida spp., has been used in neonates with invasive candidiasis at dosages of 6 mg/kg/day, and for antifungal prophylaxis in high-risk neonates. There are limited data on itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole use in neonates. Caspofungin, which is active against Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., requires higher doses in children relative to adults, and dosing is best accomplished based on body surface area. Micafungin shows a clear trend toward lower levels in the smallest patients. There are no data on the use of other new antifungal drugs (ravuconazole and anidulafungin) in neonates. In summary, the initial data suggest dosage differences in neonates for some antifungal agents, although the newer agents have not been fully tested for optimal administration in these patients.     

Clinical use of systemic antifungal agents

The chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical uses, adverse effects, and drug interactions of amphotericin B, flucytosine, ketoconazole, and miconazole are reviewed. Amphotericin B, a heptaene compound with poor water solubility, disrupts the fungal cell wall by binding to ergosterol. Ketoconazole and miconazole, imidazole derivatives, are poorly water soluble and inhibit the synthesis of ergosterol. Flucytosine is a readily water-soluble, fluorinated pyrimidine agent that may be metabolized to fluorouracil. The pharmacokinetics of amphotericin B is unique and has not yet been clearly defined. After oral administration, absorption of flucytosine from the gastrointestinal tract is rapid and nearly complete. In adults, oral administration of ketoconazole produces peak concentrations of drug one to two hours after the dose. Miconazole is administered only intravenously and distributes well into most tissues. Amphotericin B remains the drug of choice for most systemic mycoses. Dosing of amphotericin B is often empiric and patient specific. Flucytosine is rarely used alone; the combination of flucytosine and amphotericin B exerts synergistic killing of many fungi. Ketoconazole is effective for treating many chronic fungal infections. Miconazole is seldom used because of the availability of agents that are equally effective, less toxic, or both. Nephrotoxicity can occur with amphotericin B therapy, while flucytosine is associated with gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities. Ketoconazole is much less toxic than any of the other agents, while miconazole has a high incidence of adverse effects. In addition to the need for more effective and less toxic agents, research is needed to clearly define the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of currently available antifungal drugs.     

Antifungal agents used in systemic mycoses. Activity and therapeutic use

The development of the polyene antibiotic, amphotericin B, provided for the first time a drug which was clinically effective in many serious mycotic diseases. Unfortunately, it requires parenteral administration and is often toxic, factors which limit the total cumulative dose which can be given. Efforts to utilise combinations of amphotericin B with other agents were best realised with amphotericin B/flucytosine in cryptococcal meningitis, and to a lesser degree in systemic candidiasis. More recently, the introduction of new imidazoles has extended the range of applications of these drugs to fungal diseases. Two members of this group, miconazole and ketoconazole, are promising agents. Miconazole is a parenterally administered agent for patients acutely ill with candidiasis and other mycotic infections. It may be the drug of choice for Petriellidium boydii infections and it is an attractive alternative to amphotericin B for intrathecal administration to patients with fungal meningitis. Ketoconazole offers much less toxicity, the advantage of oral administration, and the possibility of indefinitely prolonged therapy. However, it does not attain high concentrations in either the urine or cerebrospinal fluid. With the imidazoles, we have entered a new era of antifungal therapy which may produce even better antifungal agents than those currently available.     

Systemic antifungal therapy: new options, new challenges

The frequency of invasive fungal infections has increased dramatically in recent decades because of an expanding population at risk. Until now, treatment options for invasive mycoses have been primarily amphotericin B and the azoles, fluconazole and itraconazole. Traditional agents are limited by an inadequate spectrum of activity, drug resistance, toxicities, and drug-drug interactions. The recent approval of caspofungin and voriconazole clearly has expanded the number of existing antifungal drugs available. However, the enthusiasm that accompanies their availability is counterbalanced by limited clinical experience, high drug acquisition costs, and distinctive toxicities. The pharmacologic characteristics, extent of clinical experience (efficacy and toxicity), and drug acquisition costs among available systemic antifungal agents are compared, with emphasis on the new agents. Also, recommendations on the role of each agent are provided according to the most common indications for systemic antifungal therapy: invasive candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, and febrile neutropenia.     

Current and future antifungal therapy: new targets for antifungal therapy

Invasive fungal infections will continue to cause major complications in immunocompromized patients. At the moment, the expansion of antifungal drug research has occurred because there is a critical need for new antifungal agents to treat these life-threatening invasive fungal infections. The overview of the development of antifungal therapy which is provided here demonstrates the increased interest in this very special area of infectious diseases. Although we now have some newer and less toxic antifungal agents that are currently available for clinical use, their clinical efficacy in some invasive fungal infections, such as aspergillosis and fusariosis, is not very good. Intense efforts in antifungal drug discovery are urgently needed to develop more promising and effective antifungal agents for use in the clinical arena.     

Antifungal pharmacotherapy for invasive mould infections

The incidence of invasive mould infections is increasing and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Among the most prevalent of these infections are those caused by Aspergillus and Fusarium species. Invasive disease caused by moulds frequently presents as a pulmonary infection, but haematogenous infection can occur. Some moulds cause cutaneous disease through either direct inoculation of the skin or secondary spread to the skin after dissemination from another body site. Early diagnosis can often be difficult and, unfortunately, diagnosis occurs late in the course of illness in many cases. Treatment options have historically been limited by the need for intravenous administration (amphotericin B), significant toxicities (amphotericin B), lack of reliable in vitro activity (e.g., amphotericin B in Fusarium and Scedosporium apiospermum infections) and relative lack of clinical experience with newer agents. The recent approval of voriconazole (Vfend, Pfizer) introduces a treatment option that demonstrates both in vitro and in vivo activity against a variety of moulds. With the recent development of the new echinocandin class of antifungal agents and newer broad-spectrum azole antifungal agents with in vitro mould activity, there is a renewed emphasis on fungal treatment strategies. Antimould therapy presents challenges in adverse effect avoidance and management, drug interactions and pharmacoeconomic considerations. Furthermore, combination therapy is being explored with these various new antifungal agents. The administration of an optimal fungicidal therapy early in the course of the illness and control of the underlying disease are vital to prevent complications and mortality from these tenacious mycoses.     

伊曲康唑与氟康唑在重症监护室早期经验性治疗真菌感染的疗效比较

目的比较伊曲康唑和氟康唑在重症监护室早期经验性治疗中的有效性和安全性。方法采取随机、对照、开放的临床试验，入选的40例患者具有真菌感染的高危因素，均出现不明原因发热，广谱抗生素治疗3～7 d无效。将入选患者随机分配为伊曲康唑治疗组和氟康唑治疗组各20例。伊曲康唑治疗组给予伊曲康唑注射液200 mg，q12 h，先治疗2 d，随后给予200 mg，qd，共5 d，再改用伊曲康唑口服液口服，每次200 mg，bid，治疗14 d；氟康唑治疗组给予氟康唑注射液400 mg静脉滴注，qd，共治疗21 d。观察患者体温变化、真菌感染情况、药物相关的不良反应和疗效。结果伊曲康唑组总有效率65.0%，不良反应率30.0%；氟康唑组总有效率50.0%，不良反应率5.0%，但两组总有效率和不良反应发生率均差异无显著性（均P＞0.05）。治疗过程中，氟康唑组出现2例深部真菌感染。结论伊曲康唑和氟康唑均可作为现阶段重症监护室早期经验性治疗的一线药物，但伊曲康唑疗效更佳。     

Itraconazole. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in superficial and systemic mycoses

Itraconazole is an orally active triazole antifungal drug which has demonstrated a broad spectrum of activity and a favourable pharmacokinetic profile. It is a potent inhibitor of most human fungal pathogens including Aspergillus sp. In non-comparative clinical trials itraconazole was shown to be extremely effective in a wide range of superficial and more serious 'deep' fungal infections when administered once or twice daily. Generally, greater than 80% of patients with superficial dermatophyte or yeast infections are cured by itraconazole. Similarly, good to excellent response rates (clinical cure or marked improvement) are achieved in paracoccidioidomycosis, histoplasmosis, sporotrichosis, blastomycosis, systemic candidiasis, coccidioidomycosis, chromomycosis, aspergillosis and cryptococcosis. Understandably, given the rare nature of some of these diseases, clinical experience is relatively limited and further evaluation, preferably controlled trials with amphotericin B and ketoconazole, would help clarify the ultimate role itraconazole will have in their management. Preliminary findings also indicate that itraconazole may hold promise for the prophylaxis of opportunistic fungal infections in patients at risk, for example women with chronic recurrent vaginal candidiasis, immunodeficient patients with chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis, AIDS patients and patients receiving immunosuppressant drugs. In studies to date itraconazole has been very well tolerated. Transient changes in indices of liver function occurred in 1 to 2% of patients; however, symptomatic liver dysfunction (as occurs infrequently with ketoconazole) has not been reported. Wider clinical experience is needed to permit clear conclusions as to whether liver dysfunction can result from itraconazole administration. Thus, while several aspects of the drug's profile require further investigation, itraconazole is a promising new oral treatment of fungal disease. The extent to which itraconazole will be employed in preference to ketoconazole will be clarified by wider clinical experience.