Treatment of severe recalcitrant dermatoses of the palms and soles with PUVA-bath versus PUVA-cream therapy

PUVA-bath therapy developed into a first line topical PUVA therapy, and gel and cream preparations have been described as alternative modes of topical 8-MOP application. Because bath-PUVA can be difficult to manage, topical PUVA therapy using 8-MOP gel or cream preparations may become an important alternative when treating localised skin diseases. However, controlled comparisons of efficacy with this alternative topical PUVA therapy are lacking. We therefore compared the efficacy of PUVA-cream therapy with PUVA-bath therapy in 12 patients with recalcitrant dermatoses of the palms and soles using a left/right trial design. These patients responded well to both treatment modalities, meaning that both could be used successfully to treat recalcitrant dermatoses of the palms and soles.     

PUVA-bath photochemotherapy (PUVA-soak therapy) of recalcitrant dermatoses of the palms and soles

PUVA-bath therapy has proven to avoid many side effects associated with oral 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) treatment. In order to investigate the effectiveness of topical PUVA-bath therapy (PUVA-soak therapy) on chronic palmoplantar dermatoses, 30 patients with plaque-type psoriasis, pustular psoriasis, endogenous eczema, dyshidrotic eczema and hyperkeratotic dermatitis of the palms and soles were treated over 8 weeks with PUVA-soak using 8-MOP. No additional treatment except skin moisturising cream such as unguentum emulsificans aquosum was used during the study period. The single UVA-doses applied ranged from 0.3 to 3.0 J/cm2 (mean single dose of 1.8 J/cm2), with a mean cumulative dose of 48.6 J/cm2 per patient. Altogether 26 of 30 patients responded well within 8 weeks of treatment with 63% of all patients showing a complete remission and 23% showing considerable improvement, as shown by flattening of plaques, decreased scaling and erythema, as well as decreased vesicle and pustule formation. The condition responding best to our therapy was palmoplantar psoriasis followed by atopic eczema. Hyperkeratotic dermatitis displayed the poorest responding rates in this study. Unwanted side effects such as erythema, pain, blistering or patchy hyperpigmentation were not observed in any of the patients. We conclude that PUVA-soak therapy can be highly efficient in the treatment of palmoplantar dermatoses, especially in the management of palmoplantar psoriasis.     

Evaluation of time-dependent response to psoralen plus UVA (PUVA) treatment with topical 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) gel in palmoplantar dermatoses

BACKGROUND: Topical psoralen plus UVA (PUVA) is an effective treatment for localized forms of eczema, psoriasis, and palmoplantar pustulosis, which avoids some of the undesirable side-effects of systemic psoralens. Aims In this study, the efficacy of topical PUVA treatment with 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) gel was compared with placebo plus UVA in chronic recurrent palmoplantar dermatoses. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with palmoplantar disease (11 with psoriasis vulgaris, six with eczema, and five with pustulosis) were enrolled in the study. The study design was a left-right comparison: one hand or foot was treated with 8-MOP 0.01% gel plus UVA, whilst the contralateral hand or foot received placebo and UVA for 6 weeks. Twenty minutes after application of the gel, both sides were exposed to UVA. The treatment regimen was three times a week, and the UVA dose was increased weekly by 20%. RESULTS: A comparison of the pre- and post-treatment scores with regard to the severity of the clinical picture and the infiltration of plaques showed a significant decrease (from 7.5 +/- 2.0 to 2.5 +/- 2.1 and from 2.0 +/- 0.7 to 0.3 +/- 0.5, respectively) in the sites treated with 8-MOP gel compared with placebo after 6 weeks. CONCLUSION: The results of the study indicate that at least 18 courses of local PUVA within 6 weeks, with a cumulative dose of 87 J/cm(2), are required to induce a significant decrease in the disease severity and an improvement in the infiltration of plaques due to 8-MOP gel at a concentration of 0.01% when treating chronic recurrent palmoplantar dermatoses.     

A new psoralen-containing gel for topical PUVA therapy: development,and treatment results in patients with palmoplantar and plaque-type psoriasis,and hyperkeratotic eczema

Summary Topical photochemotherapy with psoralen and its derivatives 4.5′,8-trimethylpsoralen (TMP) and 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP), with UVA irradiation, was evaluated with regard to minimum phototoxic dose, concentration, timing of UVA irradiation and systemic and local side-effects, in healthy volunteers. Psoralen (0.005%) in aqueous gel was found to be superior to TMP and 8-MOP in aqueous gel. No hyperpigmentation was seen after topical PUVA treatment with psoralen in aqueous gel. Patients with plaque-type psoriasis (n = 7), palmoplantar psoriasis (n = 7) and hyperkeratotic eczema (n = 2) were treated. Topical PUVA therapy was effective in most psoriasis patients, without the occurrence of local or systemic side-effects. Moreover, hyperkeratotic eczema patients who did not respond to conventional therapy showed partial remission. These results indicate that topical PUVA therapy with psoralen in aqueous gel is a useful therapeutic modality for treatment of psoriasis patients, and patients with recalcitrant dermatoses such as palmoplantar psoriasis and hyperkeratotic eczema.     

PUVA-cream photochemotherapy for the treatment of localized scleroderma

BACKGROUND: The efforts to treat localized scleroderma, including therapies with potentially hazardous side effects, are often unsatisfactory. Recently, PUVA-bath photochemotherapy has been proven highly effective in the treatment of localized scleroderma. Another form of topical PUVA therapy, 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) containing cream or gel preparations, has been proven to be as effective as PUVA-bath therapy for palmoplantar dermatoses. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the efficacy of PUVA-cream photochemotherapy in patients with localized scleroderma. METHODS: Four patients with localized scleroderma were included in the study. Diagnosis was confirmed by 20 MHz ultrasound assessment as well as pretreatment skin biopsy specimens from lesional skin. PUVA-cream therapy was performed 4 times a week; all patients received 30 treatments. RESULTS: PUVA-cream photochemotherapy induced significant clinical improvement or clearance of localized scleroderma in all patients. Clearance was documented by clinical features as well as by 20 MHz ultrasound and histopathologic analysis. CONCLUSION: PUVA-cream phototherapy can be highly effective in patients with localized scleroderma even if previous therapy was unsuccessful.     

Cream psoralen plus ultraviolet A therapy for granuloma annulare

BACKGROUND: Treatment modalities for granuloma annulare (GA) often remain unsatisfactory or can be accompanied by potentially hazardous side-effects. Psoralen plus ultraviolet (UV) A (PUVA) bath photochemotherapy has been reported to be highly effective in the treatment of GA. Another form of topical PUVA therapy, using 8-methoxypsoralen-containing cream or gel preparations, has been proven to be as effective as bath PUVA therapy in the treatment of palmoplantar dermatoses. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of cream PUVA photochemotherapy in patients with GA. METHODS: Five patients with GA were treated. The diagnosis was confirmed by pretreatment skin biopsies. Cream PUVA therapy was performed four times a week: the mean number of treatments was 26 (range 17-40) and mean cumulative UVA dose was 55.9 J cm-2 (range 18.2-109.2). RESULTS: Cream PUVA photochemotherapy induced significant clinical improvement (one patient) or clearance (four patients) of GA in all patients. Clearance was documented clinically and histopathologically. CONCLUSIONS: Cream PUVA phototherapy can be highly effective in patients affected by localized forms of GA.     

Efficacy of topical PUVA soaks for palmoplantar dermatoses: an audit

Background: With a lack of evidence base for individual topical PUVA protocols, treatment is presently based on the consensus of current practice. This audit was designed to investigate the effectiveness of topical PUVA for palmoplantar dermatoses. Methods: Phototherapy notes were reviewed on all patients who received hand and/or foot PUVA 2002–2007 in the Northern Health and Social Care Trust (NHSCT), Northern Ireland. Results: Thirty patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. The mean number of treatments, maximum single UVA dose, and cumulative dose, were 18.4, 4.2 J/cm², and 48.3 J/cm², respectively. A positive response to treatment occurred in 51.3% of patients, which fell short of the 70% standard set. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, number of treatments (P=0.04) and maximum single UVA dose (P=0.03) were the only variables associated with positive treatment outcome. The response was not influenced significantly by skin type, concurrent topical treatments, or cumulative UVA dose. Limitations to the study: Small patient numbers may have prevented the statistical significance of individual variables. Conclusions: UV dose increments should be clearly defined to avoid excess caution at the expense of an adequate patient response, and a minimum of 20 treatments administered to all patients, if tolerated.     

Treatment of palmoplantar psoriasis with monochromatic excimer light (308-nm) versus cream PUVA

Palmoplantar psoriasis is a chronic disease, which is very resistant to treatment and often leads to severe disabilities. Photochemotherapy employing psoralens combined with UVA irradiation (PUVA) is a well-accepted therapy for palmoplantar psoriasis. Its topical application (bath PUVA; cream PUVA) avoids the typical side effects of orally applied psoralens. We compared the efficacy of cream PUVA therapy with monochromatic excimer light therapy, a treatment modality employing 308-nm UVB radiation generated by a new kind of light source. Ten patients with psoriasis of the palms and soles were randomly assigned to receive cream PUVA on one side and 308-nm UVB on the contralateral side. Based on the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score, clinical assessment was carried out before and 5 weeks after the beginning of the study. At the end of the treatment period both test groups showed a remarkable PASI score reduction (308-nm UVB, 63.57%; cream PUVA, 64.64%). No relevant adverse effects were observed, except for mild irritation in a few patients. After a 12-week follow-up, a relapse of the disease was only observed in one patient. Thus, mono-chromatic excimer light cleared palmoplantar psoriasis as rapidly as cream PUVA. In contrast to cream PUVA, monochromatic excimer light therapy is not associated with prior drug application. This might lead to a lower incidence of adverse reactions and better compliance. Therefore, monochromatic excimer light therapy seems to be a useful new therapeutic option for palmoplantar psoriasis.     

Efficacy of 8-methoxypsoralen vs. 5-methoxypsoralen plus ultraviolet A therapy in patients with mycosis fungoides

BACKGROUND: Psoralen plus ultraviolet (UV) A (PUVA) is the standard treatment for early stage mycosis fungoides (MF). When 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) is used in PUVA therapy, it often produces intolerance reactions such as nausea, vomiting and headache. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether 5-methoxypsoralen (5-MOP) is a safe and effective alternative to 8-MOP in PUVA therapy for MF. METHODS: A retrospective database search and chart review was done to identify patients with MF who received PUVA with either 5-MOP or 8-MOP as initial monotherapy at our institution. Between 1990 and 2004, 14 patients [seven men and seven women; mean age 70 years, range 51-82; National Cancer Institute disease stages IA (n = 6) and IB (n = 8)] received 5-MOP, and 24 patients [21 men and three women; mean age 58 years, range 28-89; disease stages IA (n = 11), IB (n = 12) and IIB (n = 1)] received 8-MOP. RESULTS: Twelve of 14 patients (86%) in the 5-MOP group and 22 of 24 (92%) in the 8-MOP group had a complete response to PUVA. These two subgroups of complete responders did not differ significantly in terms of PUVA therapy duration, number of treatments or cumulative UVA dose. They also did not differ significantly in terms of relapse-free rate [8% (one of 12) vs. 23% (five of 22)] or time to relapse [17 months (range 4-31) vs. 14 months (range 4-33)]. Moreover, PUVA maintenance therapy with either 5-MOP or 8-MOP in a subset of patients [26% (nine of 34)] did not affect long-term relapse-free status either. CONCLUSIONS: 5-MOP and 8-MOP have comparable therapeutic efficacy when used in PUVA therapy for MF.     

Oral methoxsalen photochemotherapy of recalcitrant dermatoses of the palms and soles

PUVA therapy successfully cleared various dermatoses mainly confined to the palms and soles in 18 of 20 patients treated. The conditions treated were: plaque-type psoriasis, pustular psoriasis, endogenous eczema and persistent palmoplantar pustulosis. Seventeen patients were treated in a controlled study of PUVA therapy versus no treatment at all and in 16 of these patients the disease was cleared in the PUVA-treated areas while the untreated areas remained unchanged or deteriorated. Twelve of the 18 patients were maintained in a clear state by continued maintenance PUVA treatment over 6–31 months while 3 patients had a spontaneous remission and are free of disease off all treatment.     

Bath-water PUVA therapy with 8-methoxypsoralen in mycosis fungoides

PUVA therapy is widely used for early stage mycosis fungoides. While the efficacy of PUVA with oral 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) is well documented, the use of its topical variation, bath-water PUVA therapy with 8-MOP has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of 8-MOP bath-water PUVA therapy in adult patients with early stage mycosis fungoides. We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of bath-water delivery of 8-MOP (1 mg l(-1)) in 16 patients with early stage mycosis fungoides. In all patients complete response was achieved after a mean duration of 63 days requiring 29 treatments and a mean cumulative UVA dose of 33 J cm(-2). The time to relapse after complete clinical clearance was 45.6 (+/-9.2) weeks. In comparison, oral PUVA therapy with 8-MOP resulted in complete response after 64.5 days (25.8 treatments) with a mean relapse-free period of 30 (+/-3.5) weeks. We conclude that bath-water PUVA therapy with 8-MOP is a valuable photo-therapeutic alternative, which should be considered for patients in whom systemic psoralen cannot be used.     

Psoralen cream plus ultraviolet A photochemotherapy (PUVA cream): our experience

BACKGROUND: Psoralen ultraviolet A (PUVA) bath photochemotherapy has been proved highly effective in the treatment of various dermatoses without potential side-effects of systemic therapy. Another form of topical PUVA therapy (PUVA cream) without the logistical requirements for bath tubs has recently been developed. OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop preparation and treatment standards to PUVA cream and to confirm its clinical efficacy in the treatment of various dermatoses. METHODS: In the first phase, the safety of a novel cream containing 0.002% 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) was determined in six healthy volunteers. In a second phase, 40 patients with different dermatoses were treated with a minor concentration (0.001% 8-MOP), following the guidelines for topical PUVA of the British Photodermatology Group. RESULTS: Plasma levels of psoralen after the application of the novel cream containing 0.002% 8-MOP, were less than 34 ng/mL, the maximum 8-MOP concentration reported for topical PUVA. With a minor concentration (0.001% 8-MOP), important improvement or healing was found in 53.3% of the cycles, generally with a good response since the first month of treatment. Only mild side-effects were detected in 14 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our data, PUVA cream photochemotherapy is well accepted by patients and may be a highly effective treatment even if previous therapy was unsuccessful. In addition, PUVA cream is easier to use than PUVA bath.     

Creme-PUVA-Photochemotherapie bei chronisch stationärer Psoriasis vulgaris

PUVA-bath therapy has developed into first line topical PUVA therapy in the treatment of psoriasis. Because of logistical and economic problems, bath PUVA may be difficult to administer. Recently, cream-PUVA therapy has been described as an alternative mode of topical therapy. We treated two patients with moderate plaque-type psoriasis with this new topical approach. 0,0006% 8-methoxypsoralen cream was applied for 1 hour, directly followed by increasing doses of UVA. The number of treatments needed for clearance were 34 and 40. The cumulative UVA dosages were 71.6 and 84 J/cm(2) respectively. Our data document that cream-PUVA therapy is an effective and safe variation of topical PUVA therapy, which may develop into first line photochemotherapy for patients with moderate plaque-type psoriasis.     

Eficacia y seguridad en terapia con psoralen-UVA (PUVA) tópica en psoriasis palmoplantar. Experiencia en una serie de 48 pacientes

IntroductionPalmoplantar psoriasis is an uncommon clinical form of psoriasis. Although localized to the palms and soles, it has a considerable impact on the patient's function and quality of life.ObjectivesTo study the effectiveness and safety of psoralen-UV-A (PUVA) therapy in palmoplantar psoriasis and investigate predictors of clinical response.Material and methodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of all patients with palmoplantar psoriasis treated with topical PUVA therapy at our hospital between 2008 and 2011. Data were collected on effectiveness (using physician global assessment [PGA] scores), safety, and a range of clinical, epidemiological, and treatment-related variables.ResultsWe studied 48 patients (33 women and 15 men) with a mean age of 51 years. Treatment was considered to be effective (PGA score of 0 or 1) in 63% of cases. In addition to PUVA, systemic therapy was required in 47.9% of patients; the drug most often used was acitretin. Adverse effects were reported for 25% of patients during treatment. The most common effect was mild erythema, present in 18% of cases.ConclusionsIn our experience, topical PUVA is an appropriate treatment alternative for palmoplantar psoriasis; it offers similar response rates to systemic treatments, but has a better tolerance and safety profile. Associated systemic treatment, with acitretin in most cases, improved the probability of a satisfactory response to PUVA and should be considered in patients who do not respond adequately after 8 to 10 sessions.     

The effect of PUVA on langerhans cells in rat oral epithelium photosensitized with systemic methoxsalen or topical trioxsalen

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Ultraviolet-A radiation (UVA) of the oral mucosa after photosensitization with either systemic methoxsalen (8-MOP) or topical trioxsalen (TMP), i.e. mouth-PUVA, has been reported to be successful in the treatment of oral lichenoid lesions. In the case of PUVA treatment of skin disorders, local immune suppressive effects have been demonstrated, and the antigen presenting epithelial Langerhans cells (LCs) have been shown to be especially sensitive to ultraviolet treatments. Our aim was to compare the photobiological effects of PUVA in oral mucous membrane (OMM) using topical TMP or systemic 8-MOP photosensitization. METHODS: Rat OMM photosensitized with topical TMP or systemic 8-MOP was treated with PUVA using UVA doses of 1-8 J/cm2. The LCs were demonstrated in epithelial sheets of the treated OMM with ATPase staining. RESULTS: Both treatments caused a sim ilar, dose-dependent depletion of ATPase-positive LCs, with a maximal depletion of 80% or 73% with 8 J/cm2 at 2 days after irradiation as photosensitized with TMP or 8-MOP, respectively. This contrasts with earlier published findings in human skin, where topical TMP is an order of magnitude greater a sensitizer than 8-MOP, and PUVA-induced depletion of LCs occurs maximally 5 days after irradiation. CONCLUSION: The depletion of LCs of rat OMM after PUVA treatment is greater using topical TMP compared to systemic 8-MOP, but the difference is significantly smaller than reported earlier in human skin.     

Plasma levels of 8-methoxypsoralen following PUVA-bath photochemotherapy

Administration of 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) in a dilute bath water solution is an effective therapeutic alternative to oral PUVA therapy, avoiding systemic side effects, offering better bioavailability of the psoralen and requiring much smaller amounts of UVA for induction of therapeutic effects. To obtain exact data about the percutaneous absorption of 8-MOP during a psoralen bath, the plasma levels of the drug were determined in 26 patients with different skin diseases by a reverse high-performance liquid chromatographic method. Fifteen patients receiving oral PUVA therapy (0.8 mg 8-MOP/kg body weight) served as a positive control group. Bath solutions were prepared by diluting 15 ml of 0.5% stock solution of 8-MOP in 150 l of bath water (0.5 mg/l, 37°C). Blood samples were drawn from patients 5, 30, 60, 120 and 180 min after the bath. In the oral PUVA group, blood samples were obtained 1½ h after administration of the drug. In 23 of 26 patients, 8-MOP levels were undetectable in every blood sample. After 30 min, two patients showed detectable levels of 8-MOP (5 ng/ml, 7 ng/ml), while 60 min after the PUVA bath 8-MOP was detectable in only one volunteer (5 ng/ml). In patients receiving oral 8-MOP therapy, serum levels varied between 45 and 360 ng/ml 1½ h after drug administration. Our data confirm extremely low 8-MOP levels resulting from 8-MOP bath water treatments and provide confirmation of the absence of systemic side effects in patients who are undergoing PUVA-bath therapy.     

Kinetics and dose-response of photosensitivity in cream psoralen plus ultraviolet A photochemotherapy: comparative in vivo studies after topical application of three standard preparations

BACKGROUND: Topical photochemotherapy with bath psoralen plus ultraviolet (UV) A irradiation (PUVA) has been developed to reduce possible side-effects of oral PUVA therapy. Although the efficacy of bath PUVA therapy appears to be similar to oral PUVA therapy, provision of bathing facilities has obvious economic, logistic and sanitary implications. Cream PUVA therapy has recently been developed as a variation of topical PUVA. OBJECTIVES: To understand the photobiological effects and to increase the safety and effectiveness of this novel topical PUVA therapy, we assessed the kinetics and dose-response of phototoxicity of 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) cream in order to develop a treatment schedule for this treatment option. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients (63 men and 35 women) undergoing cream PUVA therapy were studied. The phototoxic properties of topically applied 8-MOP in three different water-in-oil creams as vehicles were assessed. In a dose-response study, four concentrations of 8-MOP cream (0.0006-0.005%) were used for determination of the minimal phototoxic dose (MPD). The kinetics of photosensitization were tested by determination of MPDs after different application times of 8-MOP cream (10, 20, 30 and 60 min). The persistence of phototoxicity was assessed by UVA exposure at defined time intervals after application of 8-MOP cream (0, 30, 60 and 120 min). RESULTS: The concentration required to produce sufficient but not undue photosensitization of the skin was 0.001% 8-MOP. The duration of application leading to the lowest MPD was 30 min. Greatest photosensitization was achieved when UVA irradiation was performed between 0 and 30 min after 8-MOP removal. These findings showed no significant difference between the three vehicles used. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our data we recommend application of 0.001% 8-MOP in a water-in-oil cream for 30 min. Irradiation with UVA should be performed within 30 min after removal of 8-MOP cream, as there is a rapid decrease in photosensitivity thereafter.     

Treatment of persistent severe atopic dermatitis in 113 Japanese patients with oral psoralen photo-chemotherapy

Oral administration of psoralen and whole body exposure to UVA (oral PUVA) has been used for the treatment of 113 patients with severe atopic dermatitis (AD). 8-Methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) was given at a dose of 0.5-0.6 mg/kg two hours prior to UVA (3-8 J/cm2) irradiation. Patients were treated three times a week while hospitalized. Other medications which had been given before PUVA therapy were permitted. At four and eight weeks after PUVA therapy, the severity score of AD had decreased by 51% and 80%, and the cumulative doses of UVA were 51.2 J/cm2 and 115.3 J/cm2, respectively. The amounts and strength of topical cortico-steroids were decreased during PUVA therapy. No adverse effects that required discontinuation of the PUVA therapy were observed. After discharge, maintenance therapy with UVB phototherapy and/or conventional treatment of AD kept the patients in remission in the outpatient clinic. The QOL of patients was greatly improved. Photochemotherapy with oral 8-MOP can be indicated in patients with severe, widespread AD, especially if standard therapy fails. This is the first report of oral PUVA therapy in a large series of Japanese patients with AD.     

New aspects in uv and photochemotherapy

Recent data show that from a pharmacological point of view topical (cream or bath) PUVA therapy is superior to systemic PUVA. Due to a significant reduction of side effects compared to systemic PUVA, bath PUVA has now started to replace oral PUVA therapy. Narrowband UVB has proved to be superior to broadband UVB in the treatment of psoriasis and is effective for a number of dermatoses such as vitilgo, atopic dermatitis and polymorphic light eruption. UVA1 phototherapy is highly effective in the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis and sclerosing diseases of the skin. Data dealing with UVA1 phototherapy for other indications are still preliminary. High-dose UVA1 is has been widely replaced by medium-dose UVA1, as a number of studies have shown similar therapeutic efficacy of both dose regimens.     

The efficacy of localized PUVA therapy for chronic hand and foot dermatoses

The response to treatment of all patients enrolled over an 18-month period for localized oral or topical psoralen photochemotherapy (PUVA) of chronic hand and foot dermatoses was retrospectively reviewed. There were broadly similar success rates for the two groups for complete clearance: 61.5% (eight of 13 patients who completed therapy)—oral PUVA, 47.8% (11 of 23 patients who completed therapy)—topical PUVA, and for significant improvement: 23.1% (three of 13 patients)—oral PUVA, 30.4% (seven of 23 patients)—topical PUVA; there were no significant differences in response when diagnostic subgroupings of the hand dermatoses were taken into account. The mean number of treatments (22 for oral PUVA and 24 for topical), treatment durations (122 and 129 days), maximum UVA doses (11.2 and 12.3J/cm²) and to a lesser extent cumulative UVA doses (189.3 and 237.0 J/ cm²) for the therapies were similar in the two groups; adverse effects were minimal for both treatment protocols. However, at least five of the eight patients in the oral PUVA group and five of the 11 in the topical group who cleared completely relapsed after a mean 86 (range 19.245) and 174 (range 23-596) days, respectively. These findings are in broad agreement with those of previous studies. Therefore to avoid generalized photo-sensitivity and a higher likelihood of adverse effects with systemic therapy, as well as a possible slower relapse rate, topical therapy seems preferable.