Risk of pancreatitis following endoscopically placed large-bore plastic biliary stents with and without biliary sphincterotomy for management of postoperative bile leaks

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic transpapillary biliary stent placement is effective for closure of postoperative bile leaks. Large-bore stents (10 French) may transiently obstruct the adjacent pancreatic duct orifice causing acute pancreatitis. Endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy may reduce this risk, but it introduces separate risks of bleeding and perforation. The objective of this study was to compare complications after large-bore biliary stent placement (10 Fr) with and without sphincterotomy in patients with bile leaks. METHODS: The institutional endoscopy database was queried to identify patients who had undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogrpahy (ERCP) for bile leak between March 1996 and August 2006. Procedural reports were reviewed for evidence of biliary sphincterotomy, cholangiographic and pancreatographic findings, transpapillary stent placement, and procedural complications. Patients with prior biliary sphincterotomy, choledochoenteric anastomosis, placement of multiple biliary stents and expandable metal biliary stents, biliary stents smaller than 10 Fr, and patients in whom a stent was not placed were excluded. The chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Probability 相似文献   

Migration of an AXIOS stent complex into the colon – A case report

IntroductionPancreatic fluid collections are a common complication of acute pancreatitis. They are classified as acute peripancreatic fluid collections and pancreatic pseudocysts. There has been an increase in the use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage stents for management of these collections. As a result, complications such as stent migration are becoming more prevalent.Presentation of caseA 47-year-old male presented to the emergency department with upper abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, and intermittent fevers. The patient had a known history of a pancreatic pseudocyst. He had undergone an endoscopic cyst-gastrostomy and placement of an AXIOS and Compass stents for drainage prior to the current presentation. The patient was investigated with a computed tomography (CT) scan that demonstrated acute pancreatitis, and migration of his AXIOS/Compass stent complex into the transverse colon. The patient was managed conservatively, and ultimately passed the stent through his bowel motions without issue. Follow up abdominal x-ray confirmed the passage of the stent.DiscussionStent migration is a recognised complication of stent placement but is infrequently described for lumen-apposing metal stents like the AXIOS stent. The AXIOS stent has a dumbbell configuration designed to reduce the rate of migration compared to the original double-pigtail plastic stents. Despite this, stent migration still occurs, as in this case.ConclusionComplications of AXIOS stents can also include migration of the stent despite their specific design to prevent this. Conservative management is feasible rather than endoscopic retrieval and can be considered if there are no complicating features.     

Colovesical fistula secondary to the migration of a biliary stent. Case report

BACKGROUND: The endoscopic placement of endoprostheses to decompress biliary obstruction is a commonly used treatment for malignant biliary diseases and is also used in the treatment of benign biliary strictures. Unusual complications of endoprosthesis placement have been described and include the migration of the stent. We present a case to share with the scientific community, an unusual complication secondary to the migration of a biliary stent that has not previously been reported to our knowledge. CASE REPORT: We present the case of a 47-year-old female with a diagnosis of benign papillary stenosis. The patient received a biliary endoprosthesis with clinical improvement. Later she underwent open cholecystectomy and common duct exploration. At consultation 18 months later, the patient presents with indistinct lower abdominal pain and dysuria. We performed imaging studies where the biliary stent was observed, partly in the sigmoid colon and partly in the bladder. The patient underwent surgery where a colovesical fistula was found and treated during the same surgical event. The patient was discharged succesfully.     

Surgical relief of small bowel obstruction by migrated biliary stent: extraction without enterotomy

Background:

Distal stent migration is a well-known complication following insertion of biliary stents. Most such cases can be managed expectantly, because the stents pass through the gastrointestinal tract. However, small bowel obstruction as a result of the stent mandates surgical intervention.

Methods:

We report the case of a patient who had distal stent migration causing a small bowel obstruction. We successfully retrieved the stent without an enterotomy, by using a combination of laparoscopy, endoscopy, and fluoroscopy. Our unique technique greatly decreased the risk of bacterial peritonitis in this patient with decompensated cirrhosis and associated ascites, which in this patient population results in a high mortality.

Results:

Management of small bowel obstruction secondary to biliary stent migration necessitates operative intervention. Retrieval of a dislodged stent can be performed safely without subjecting the patient to an enterotomy or a small bowel resection. Postoperative morbidity should be significantly reduced by this approach.

Conclusion:

Retrieval of biliary stents in cases of small bowel obstruction without perforation may be successfully performed without enterotomy or bowel resection. A similar approach may be applied to other foreign bodies dislodged in the small bowel.     

Late complication after colon self-expandable metal stent placement: a case report

Treatment of acute colorectal malignant obstruction, by using self-expandable metallic stents is useful for both palliative and decompressive therapy before the final surgical treatment. In this case, the patient may be benefit from a period of medical optimization prior to undergoing planned surgical resection by a colorectal surgeon. This is a minimally invasive procedure, relatively safe, which obviates the need for colostomy for evacuation relieving physical and psychological burden and contributing the improvement of quality of life. Furthermore, this method also has the advantage of being cost-effective. The previous experience in the benign biliary stenosis allowed the extension of using the metallic stents also for the treatment of benign colorectal diseases (diverticular occlusion, anastomotic strictures, colonic endometriosis). Complications of colon self-expandable metallic stents placement may occur during the procedure and soon after placement (early complications) or, rarely, late after insertion (late complications). These include bleeding, re-obstruction, pain, tenesmus, stent migration, and perforation. The authors report a case of an 81 year-old woman with inoperable rectal carcinoma with liver metastasis who underwent palliative treatment of self-expanding metallic stent endoscopic placement. One month later, the patient presented with acute abdomen at Accidents and Emergencies Department. The diagnosis was a late rectosigmoid junction perforation by stent placement.     

Clinical use of the self-expanding metallic stent in the management of colorectal cancer

PURPOSE: This report describes our experience with the use of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) in the management of obstructing colorectal cancer. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing placement of SEMS between May 1997 and January 2000 was performed. RESULTS: Insertion of SEMS was attempted in 12 patients. Successful stent placement was achieved in 10 of the 12 patients. The locations of lesions were hepatic flexure (2), splenic flexure (1), left colon (1), sigmoid colon (4) and rectum (4). The intended uses of SEMS were for palliation in 3 patients and as a bridge to elective surgery in 9. In the latter group, SEMS placement allowed for preoperative bowel preparation in 4 patients and administration of neoadjuvant therapy prior to elective surgery in 2 patients. One patient died prior to definitive surgery. Stent placement was unsuccessful in 2 patients. Three SEMS-related complications occurred; 1 stent migrated and 1 stent obstructed secondary to tumor ingrowth. One patient died 13 days after stent placement and colonic decompression. CONCLUSION: SEMS represent a useful tool in the management of obstructing colorectal neoplasms. As a bridge to surgery, SEMS provide time for a complete preoperative evaluation and a mechanical bowel preparation and may obviate the need for fecal diversion or on-table lavage. It may also allow for time to administer neoadjuvant therapy when indicated. As a palliative measure, SEMS can eliminate the need for an operation.     

Percutaneous retrieval of a biliary stent after migration and ileal perforation

We present a case of a migrated biliary stent that resulted in a distal small bowel perforation, abscess formation and high grade partial small bowel obstruction in a medically stable patient without signs of sepsis or diffuse peritonitis. We performed a percutaneous drainage of the abscess followed by percutaneous retrieval of the stent. The entero-peritoneal fistula closed spontaneously with a drain in place. We conclude, migrated biliary stents associated with perforation distal to the Ligament of Trietz (LOT), may be treated by percutaneous drainage of the abscess and retrieval of the stent from the peritoneal cavity, even when associated with a large intra-abdominal abscess.     

Complication of benign tracheobronchial strictures by self-expanding metal stents

OBJECTIVES: Self-expanding metal stents are used to palliate benign strictures. We examined the complications of this approach. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2002, we observed recurrent airway obstruction and extension of benign inflammatory strictures after the placement of tracheobronchial Microvasive Ultraflex stents and Wallstents (Boston Scientific Corp, Natick, Mass), in 10 patients with postintubation strictures and 5 with other indications; all but 1 patient were referred to us. Patients with tracheal (9), subglottic (1), combined tracheal and subglottic (3), and bronchial (2) strictures had been treated with covered and uncovered Wallstents (6) and Microvasive Ultraflex stents (9). RESULTS: After stent insertion, stricture and granulations within previously normal airway were seen in all patients. New subglottic strictures resulting from the stent caused hoarseness in 4 patients. A bronchoesophageal fistula was found in 1 patient at presentation and a tracheoesophageal fistula in another during extraction of a Wallstent. Primary surgical reconstruction, judged to have been feasible before wire stent insertion in 10 patients, was possible after stenting in only 7 and failed in 2. Palliative tubes were placed in 60% (9/15). Self-expanding metal stents may lengthen luminal damage, incite subglottic strictures, and cause esophagorespiratory fistula in inflammatory airway strictures. The injury is severe, occurs after a short duration of stenting, and precludes definitive surgical treatment or requires more extensive tracheal resection. CONCLUSION: The current generation of self-expanding metal stents should be avoided in benign strictures of trachea and bronchi.     

Pancreaticoduodenectomy after placement of endobiliary metal stents

Contemporary treatment programs for patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer often involve preoperative therapy. When the duration of preoperative therapy exceeds 2 months, the risk of plastic endobiliary stent occlusion increases. Metal stents have much better patency but may complicate subsequent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). We evaluated rates of perioperative morbidity, mortality, and stent complications in 272 consecutive patients who underwent PD at our institution from May 2001 to November 2004. Of these 272 patients, 29 (11%) underwent PD after placement of a metal stent, 141 underwent PD after placement of a plastic stent, 10 had PD after biliary bypass without stenting, and 92 had PD without any form of biliary decompression. No differences were found between the Metal Stent group and all other patients in median operative time, intraoperative blood loss, or length of hospital stay. No perioperative deaths occurred in the Metal Stent group versus 3 (1.2%) deaths in the other 243 patients. The incidence of major perioperative complications was similar between the two groups, including the rates of pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal abscess, and wound infection. Furthermore, there were no differences in the perioperative morbidity or mortality rates between patients who underwent preoperative biliary decompression with a stent of any kind (metal or plastic) and those patients who underwent no biliary decompression at all. Metal stent-related complications occurred in 2 (7%) of 29 patients during a median preoperative interval of 4.1 months; in contrast, 75 (45%) of the 166 patients who had had plastic stents experienced complications, including 98 stent occlusions, during a median preoperative interval of 3.9 months (P < 0.001). We conclude that the use of expandable metal stents does not increase PD-associated perioperative morbidity or mortality, and as such an expandable metal stent is our preferred method of biliary decompression in patients with symptomatic malignant distal bile duct obstruction in whom surgery is not anticipated, or in whom there is a significant delay in the time to surgery. Presented at the Forty-Sixth Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Chicago, Illinois, May 14–18, 2005 (oral presentation). Supported by the Lockton Fund for Pancreatic Cancer Research, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.     

自发性孤立性肠系膜上动脉夹层的诊断及腔内支架治疗

目的:探讨自发性孤立性肠系膜上动脉夹层(SIDSMA)的诊断及治疗策略。方法:回顾分析2008—2010年期间15例接受血管腔内支架治疗的SIDSMA患者的临床资料。结果:15例均未合并夹层破裂出血或肠坏死。其中,12例行单层支架释放,3例行重叠支架释放,共释放支架18个(球扩式2个,自膨式16个)。术后及随访过程中,症状改善14例(93.3%),症状无变化1例(6.7%),无死亡,无肠坏死、腹腔出血、心肌梗死、脑血管意外、肾功能衰竭、消化道出血、肺炎等严重并发症发生。平均住院4(2~7)d。平均随访时间11(6~23)个月。15例患者术后6个月均行CTA复查,支架通畅率为100%,支架远端新发夹层1例(6.7%)。结论:对于未合并夹层破裂出血、肠坏死的SIDSMA患者,腔内支架治疗是一种安全、有效、微创的治疗选择。     

Endoscopic management of biliary strictures after duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to characterize the features of the biliary strictures that occur after duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction during right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and to evaluate the feasibility of correcting such stricture endoscopically by inserting an "inside stent," that is, a short internal stent, above the sphincter of Oddi. METHODS: Biliary stricture occurred in 26 (35.6%) of 73 consecutive patients who underwent right-lobe LDLT with duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction from July 1999 through October 2001 and survived for more than 3 months. Of the 26 patients who had biliary stricture, 22 were referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) and 4 for percutaneous cholangiography. RESULTS: ERC disclosed biliary stricture in 19 (86.4%) of the 22 patients who underwent the procedure. One patient had an unbranched stricture, 16 had a fork-shaped stricture, 1 had a trident-shaped stricture, and 1 had a stricture with more than three branches. Fourteen (73.7%) of the patients with strictures were treated endoscopically by inserting inside stents ranging from 7 F to 12 F in size, three underwent a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy to repair their stricture, and two were closely observed as outpatients. Of the 14 patients who were treated with the inside-stent, only 1 had acute cholangitis immediately after the procedure and underwent a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. The other 13 patients who were treated with the inside stent have not required surgical repair for as long as an average of 586 days. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic placement of an inside stent is useful for treating biliary strictures in patients who have undergone right-lobe LDLT with duct-to-duct reconstruction.     

Double stenting for esophageal and tracheobronchial stenoses

Background. We examined the complications and outcomes of placing stents for both esophageal and tracheobronchial stenoses.

Methods. We placed stents for both esophageal and tracheobronchial stenoses in 8 patients (7 with esophageal cancer and 1 with lung cancer). Covered or noncovered metallic stents were used for the esophageal stenoses, except in 1 patient treated with a silicone stent. Silicone stents were used for the tracheobronchial stenoses. The grades of esophageal and tracheobronchial stenoses were scored.

Results. All patients experienced improvement of grades of both dysphagia and respiratory symptoms after stent therapy. The complications were: (1) 2 patients suffered respiratory distress after placement of the esophageal stent because of compression of the trachea by the stent; and (2) 3 patients developed new esophagotracheobronchial fistulae, and 2 patients had recurring fistula symptoms because of growth of preexisting fistulae after the stent placement, which were caused by pressure from the 2 stents. Despite the fistulae, the 5 patients treated with covered metallic stents did not complain of fistula symptoms, but 2 patients treated with noncovered metallic or silicone stents did complain.

Conclusions. For patients with both esophageal and tracheobronchial stenoses, a stent should be introduced into the tracheobronchus first. Because placement of stents in both the esophagus and tracheobronchus has a high risk of enlargement of the fistula, a covered metallic stent is preferable for esophageal cancer involving the tracheobronchus.     

Prevention of clogging of biliary stents by administration of levofloxacin and ursodeoxycholic acid

One of the main advances in biliopancreatic endoscopic therapy has been the ability to palliate patients with biliary obstruction by placement of a stent during ERCP, but this is often complicated by clogging of the stent with subsequent jaundice and/or cholangitis. Stent clogging may be caused by microbiological adhesion and biliary stasis. Therefore, the use of antibiotics and choleretic agents such as levofloxacin and ursodeoxycholic acid has been investigated to see whether they prolong stent patency. Ninety patients with strictures of the biliary tract and untreatable macrolithiasis with endoscopically inserted stents were randomized into two groups: 49 subjects in group 1 (levofloxacin + ursodeoxycholic acid) and 41 in group 2 (ursodeoxycholic acid alone). In the patients in group 1 "stent patency in situ" was 50% longer than in group 2, with a lower incidence of cholangitis and hospital admittance. No adverse pharmacological effects were registered. Treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid and levofloxacin to prevent clogging of biliary stents is recommended as routine practice on the basis of our brief experience. Further trials are needed with rigorous methodology and adequate statistical power, because the perfect biliary stent (inexpensive, easy to insert, and with prolonged patency) does not exist. Prophylactic stent replacement is probably the most prudent strategy to avoid cholangitis, but the optimal time interval is unknown.     

Use of endoscopy in the management of postoperative ureterovaginal fistula

The aim of the study was to evaluate endourological techniques in the management of iatrogenic ureterovaginal fistula. Seventeen patients referred to us after gynecologic surgery were diagnosed as having iatrogenic ureterovaginal fistula. First, retrograde double-J stenting was tried. If this failed, percutaneous nephrostomy using an antegrade double-J stent was performed. If this also failed, open surgical repair was performed. The retrograde double-J stent bypassed the fistula in 2 patients (11.8%). Percutaneous nephrostomy was performed in the remaining 15. The antegrade double-J stent bypassed the fistula in another 2 of these patients (11.8%). Open surgical repair was performed in the remaining 13 patients (67.5%) (direct ureteroneocystostomy) with nipple valve in 11 patients and Boari flap with psoas hitch in 2 patients). Of all patients, 2 had ureteral stricture, one after antegrade double-J stenting and the other after open repair. It was concluded that early intervention is recommended in the treatment of iatrogenic uretrovaginal fistula, causing minimal morbidity and discomfort, and being less expensive. EDITORIAL COMMENT: This is an interesting paper that is worthy of mention because of an important concept in the management of an iatrogenic ureterovaginal fistula. The traditional management of these fistulas has been ureteroneocystostomy [1]. However, recent urologic literature suggests that modern endoscopic treatment is highly successful if the passage of an internal stent is possible [2,3]. This is a concept that must be shared with our urogynecologic colleagues. In this paper, 4 of 14 patients with an iatrogenic fistula underwent placement of an indwelling stent. Of these, two were placed cystoscopically, whereas the other two were placed percutaneously. All four ureterovaginal fistulas healed successfully. However, 1 patient developed a ureteral stricture. It is noteworthy that in the combined series of Selzman [2] and this Tulane group not only were all ureterovaginal fistulas successfully treated with a stent, but only 1 of 11 patients (9%) developed a stricture. Although the sample size is small, this paper supports the conclusion that successful endoscopic placement of a double-J stent does allow the ureterovaginal fistula to heal spontaneously. Therefore, initial endoscopic management of an iatrogenic ureterovaginal fistula is a reasonable recommendation. However, equally important is the development of a ureteral stricture causing ‘silent hydronephrosis’. After stent removal the patient may develop a distal ureteral stricture with a completely asymptomatic hydronephrosis — ‘silent hydronephrosis’. Although the patient may be clinically asymptomatic, the renal units remain in jeopardy. Therefore, routine periodic follow-up with radiologic studies is warranted after stent removal.     

Management of the bladder during surgical treatment of enterovesical fistulas from benign bowel disease

BACKGROUND: Management of the bladder in enterovesical fistulas from benign bowel disease is not well described in the literature and there is no clear consensus. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was done of all patients with benign bowel disease and an enterovesical fistula who underwent definitive surgical management between January 1993 and December 2005. Patients were excluded if they had any history of abdominal cancer or pelvic radiation. Surgical management protocol for enterovesical fistulas included a period of perioperative bowel rest, surgical exploration, separation of the fistulized bowel from the bladder, resection of the diseased bowel segment, and Foley catheter placement for 1 week. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were eligible for the study. The average patient age was 54.3 years (range 19 to 88 years old). Twenty-six women and 48 men underwent celiotomy and segmental resection of the offending bowel and bowel side of the fistula. The bladder side of the fistula was managed by Foley catheter alone in 68% and by surgical repair in 32%. Fifty-two patients had diverticulitis (70.3%) and 22 had Crohn's disease (29.7%). Mean followup was 26.4 months, and median followup was 6.45 months. One patient developed a colocutaneous and vesicocutaneous fistula after celiotomy. The remaining bladder defects healed within 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: Successful surgical management of most enterovesical fistulas from diverticulitis or Crohn's disease requires only resection of the diseased bowel, with minimal need for repair or resection of the bladder side of the fistula. Indwelling Foley catheter placement alone is typically sufficient for bladder healing. Only when there are overt defects into the bladder should formal repair be undertaken.     

Placement of self-expanding metal stents for acute malignant large-bowel obstruction: a collective review

Background The purpose of this study was to review our experience with self-expanding metal stents as the initial interventional approach in the management of acute malignant large-bowel obstruction. Methods Twenty-six patients who underwent placement of colonic stents at our institution between June 1994 and June 2000 were identified and reviewed. Results In 14 patients, the stents were placed for palliation, whereas in 12, they were placed as a bridge to surgery. In 22 patients (85%), stent placement was successful on the first occasion. In the remaining four individuals, one was successfully stented at the second occasion, and three required emergency surgery. Nine of the 12 patients (75%) in the bridge-to-surgery group underwent elective colon resection. In the palliative group, four patients (29%) had reobstruction of the stents, and in one (9%), the stent migrated. In the remaining nine patients (64%), the stent was patent until the patient died or until the time of last follow-up (median, 156 days). Conclusions In our experience with 26 patients who developed a complete bowel obstruction as a consequence of a malignant tumor, placement of colonic stents to achieve immediate nonoperative decompression proved to be both safe and effective. Subsequent elective resection was accomplished in the majority of resectable cases.     

Systematic appraisal of the role of metallic endobiliary stents in the treatment of benign bile duct stricture

OBJECTIVE: To carry out a systematic appraisal of the current status of the use of metallic endobiliary stents in the treatment of benign biliary strictures. METHODS: A computerized search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases identified 37 studies providing detailed clinical course data on outcome of metallic endobiliary stent placement in 400 patients. Pooled data were examined for etiology of stricture, indications for stent placement, procedure-related complications, and outcome with reference to stent patency. RESULTS: The median (range) number of patients per report was 8 (2-54) with a median recruitment period of 44 (9-126) months. The most frequent indications were postoperative biliary strictures in 123 (31%), stenosed biliary-enteric anastomoses in 79 (20%), and biliary strictures following liver transplantation in 88 (22%). During a median follow up of 31 (1-111) months, 139 (35%) stents occluded, and there are little patency data beyond 2 years after deployment, with 99 (25%) known to be patent at 3 years from stent placement. CONCLUSIONS: These pooled data on 400 patients constitute the largest collective report to date on the use of metallic endobiliary stents for benign biliary strictures. The results show a critical lack of data on long-term patency such that at the present time, metallic endobiliary stents should not be used for benign stricture in those patients with a predicted life expectancy greater than 2 years.     

Newly designed large cell Niti-S stent for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a pilot study

Background

Whether uni- or bilateral drainage should be performed for malignant hilar biliary obstruction remains a matter of debate. Moreover, endoscopic placement of bilateral metallic stents has been considered difficult and complicated. Although the Y-stent with a central wide-open mesh facilitates bilateral stent placement, it has limitations. This study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of the Niti-S large cell D-type biliary stent (LCD) with a uniform large cell for both uni- and bilateral drainage of malignant hilar biliary obstruction.

Methods

From April 2008 to March 2009, a total of 12 consecutive patients with unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction of Bismuth type 2 or greater underwent placement of LCD. Before LCD placement, all the patients underwent endoscopic unilateral biliary drainage using a plastic stent or a nasobiliary drainage tube. If jaundice improved after the procedure, the plastic stent or nasobiliary drainage tube was replaced with the unilateral LCD. If jaundice did not resolve or contralateral cholangitis occurred, bilateral LCD placement was performed.

Results

Seven patients had unilateral and five patients had bilateral LCD placement. Technical success was achieved for all 12 patients. An early complication occurred for one patient (8%), and stent occlusion occurred for six patients (50%) because of tumor ingrowth (n?=?4) or sludge (n?=?2). These patients were managed by insertion of plastic stents (n?=?4) or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (n?=?2). The median stent patency period was 202?days.

Conclusions

The newly designed endoscopic metallic stent may be feasible and effective for malignant hilar biliary obstruction, and endoscopic reintervention is relatively simple.     

To stent or not to stent bilioenteric anastomosis after iatrogenic injury: a dilemma not answered?

BACKGROUND: Bile duct injury is a complex and serious complication whose frequency has not diminished. A bilidigestive anastomosis (Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy) is usually needed after complex injuries. Placement of an anastomotic stent is a matter of debate and to our knowledge there is no study that compares the results between stenting and not stenting the anastomosis. DESIGN: A retrospective review of medical records of patients operated on for biliary reconstruction after iatrogenic injury. SETTING: Tertiary care academic university hospital. PATIENTS: A comparative study was performed of patients operated on between 1995 and 1999, who were referred to our hospital for acute or elective reconstruction of the biliary tract following iatrogenic injury. All patients underwent Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those who underwent Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy with a transanastomotic stent and those who underwent Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy without a transanastomotic stent. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative mortality, anastomotic dysfunction, biliary fistula, reoperations, postoperative complications, postoperative liver function tests. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients with high and complex biliary injuries (Bismuth type III, IV; Strasberg D, E). Thirty-seven cases had reconstruction with the placement of a transanastomotic stent and 26 did not have a stent placed. No operative mortality was observed. The postoperative outcomes of both groups were compared and no differences found. Good results were observed in more than 80% of the patients. Reoperations were more frequent in the nonstented group (15% vs. 5%) and complications were more frequent in the stented group (16% vs. 7%). CONCLUSIONS: Good results are obtained with a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy after complex injuries. The use of transanastomotic stents has to be selective according to the individual characteristics of each patient and the experience of each surgeon. We recommend their use when unhealthy (ie, ischemic, scarred) and small ducts (<4 mm) are found.     

Epidural catheters can facilitate laparoscopic placement of ureteral stent: description of a technique

AIM: To introduce a novel technique for laparoscopic placement of ureteral stent and to investigate the safety and effectiveness of this new method. METHODS: Fourteen patients underwent laparoscopic placement of ureteral stents with the technique. The stent was indwelled with an epidural catheter, delivered to the operative field, and placed through the ureteral incision into the renal pelvis and bladder, respectively. The stent was then secured with pincers, while the epidural catheter was removed. RESULTS: With this method, the ureteral stent insertion is very convenient and time saving (the mean time for inserting a stent was 2.7 min). The stents were successfully inserted into 13 patients once. One patient underwent insertion of the stent twice intraoperatively. Thirty days after the operations, none of double-J stents had migrated out of the renal pelvis or bladder. CONCLUSIONS: This technique is reliable and effective in laparoscopic ureteral operations. Its use should be generalized in laparoscopic ureteral operations.