Risk factors for the development of accommodative esotropia following treatment for infantile esotropia.

PURPOSE: One aim of the study was to determine whether accommodative esotropia after surgical alignment in infantile esotropia occurs because a pre-existing accommodative component is unmasked at the time of surgery or whether it occurs as a sequela of infantile esotropia. A second aim of the present study was to examine risk factors for accommodative esotropia after surgery for infantile esotropia. METHODS: A total of 80 consecutive patients who were enrolled in a prospective study of infantile esotropia had been followed for more than 4 years and had achieved orthoposition were included. Twelve potential risk factors were examined: age at onset, initial esodeviation, initial refractive error, age at alignment, delay in alignment, presurgical glasses, amblyopia, additional surgical procedures, unstable alignment, increase in hypermetropia, peripheral fusion, and stereopsis. Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios were computed for each factor and were corrected to relative risks. RESULTS: Overall, 48 of 80 children (60%) developed accommodative esotropia at a mean age of 33 months. Increasing hypermetropia, delay in alignment, and poor stereopsis posed significant risks for accommodative esotropia. The remaining 9 factors were not associated with increased risk for accommodative esotropia. CONCLUSIONS: Accommodative esotropia is unlikely to be a pre-existing condition in most cases because the mean age of onset was 23 months postoperative and the prevalence of preoperative hypermetropia greater than +3.00 D was low. Both delay in alignment and stereopsis risk factors may reflect compromised binocular sensory status that allows accommodative esotropia to occur at low to moderate levels of hypermetropia. Identification of children treated for infantile esotropia who are at risk for accommodative esotropia may allow for prevention or early treatment.     

The role of anisometropia in the development of accommodative esotropia.

PURPOSE: To determine whether anisometropia increases the risk for the development of accommodative esotropia with hypermetropia. METHODS: Records of all new patients with a refractive error of +2.00 D or more (mean spherical equivalent of both eyes) over a 42-month period were reviewed. Three hundred forty-five patients were thus analyzed to determine the effect of anisometropia (>or=1 D) on the relative risk of developing accommodative esotropia and of developing unsatisfactory control with spectacles once esotropia was present. RESULTS: Anisometropia (>or=1 D) increased the relative risk of developing accommodative esotropia to 1.68 (P < .05). Anisometropia (>or=1 D) increased the relative risk for esotropia to 7.8 (P < .05) in patients with a mean spherical equivalent less than +3.00 D and increased it to 1.49 (P < .05) in patients with a mean spherical equivalent of +3.00 D or more (P = .016). In patients with esotropia and anisometropia (>or=1 D), the relative risk for a deviation that was unsatisfactorily controlled with spectacles was 1.72 (P < .05) compared with patients with esotropia but without anisometropia. Unsatisfactorily controlled esotropia was present in 33% of patients with anisometropia versus 0% of patients without anisometropia, with a mean hypermetropic spherical equivalent of less than +3.00 D (P = .003); however, anisometropia did not significantly increase the relative risk of unsatisfactory control of esotropia with spectacles in patients with a hypermetropic spherical equivalent of +3.00 D or more. Although amblyopia and anisometropia were closely associated, anisometropia increased the relative risk for esotropia to 2.14 (P < .05), even in the absence of amblyopia. CONCLUSIONS: Anisometropia (>or=1 D) is a significant risk factor for the development of accommodative esotropia, especially in patients with lower overall hypermetropia (>+3.00 D). Anisometropia also increases the risk that an accommodative esotropia will not be satisfactorily aligned with spectacles.     

Early-onset refractive accommodative esotropia.

INTRODUCTION: We studied the natural history of pure refractive accommodative esotropia after spectacle correction in patients with onset before 1 year old to determine whether their outcomes and characteristics were different from those of patients with more typical age at onset of refractive accommodative esotropia. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 17 children with onset of refractive accommodative esotropia before 1 year old. Records of 26 children with onset after 2 years old were reviewed as controls. RESULTS: The mean ages at diagnosis were 9 months and 48 months for the study and control groups, respectively. All 17 study patients and all 26 control patients were initially well aligned with spectacles at distance and near. Follow-up averaged 34 months for study patients and 41 months for control patients. Three study patients (17.6%) and 1 control patient (3.8%) had eventual deterioration and required strabismus surgery (P = .28). None of the study patients developed amblyopia, whereas 42% of control patients did (P = .001). Seven of 15 (47%) of the study patients with known birth history were born prematurely, whereas only 3 of 24 (12%) control patients were born prematurely (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Refractive accommodative esotropia was diagnosed at as early as and age 4 months. Prematurity appeared to be a risk factor. Amblyopia was not detected in any patient with early-onset refractive accommodative esotropia. Treatment with full hyperopic spectacle correction led to long-term stable alignment, with relatively few patients requiring surgery.     

Factors influencing stereoacuity in refractive accommodative esotropia

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate factors that promote binocular sensory function in patients with refractive accommodative esotropia (RAE) who have successful optical alignment. METHODS: Charts of 64 patients with RAE were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical factors examined included onset age of RAE, duration of misalignment, history of misalignment in family members, amblyopia, amblyopia treatment, refractive error, anisometropia, ocular movement disorders, visual acuity level, and the presence of intermittent or constant misalignment after optical correction of the hyperopic refractive error. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (50%) were able to see test figures on any plates of TNO test and were considered to have stereoscopic vision. Intermittent or constant misalignment detected at any visit was found to affect stereoacuity adversely in patients with RAE. INTERPRETATION: Despite successful opitical alignment, as many as 50% of patients with RAE had anomalous binocular sensory function. An intermittent or constant eye misalignment poses a risk for anomalous binocular vision. These finding could promote prompt and appropriate optical corrections in order to minimize the adverse effects of intermittent or constant eye misalignment on binocular sensory function in patients with RAE.     

内斜视相关因素分析

目的探讨影响内斜视的因素。方法观察136例远视度大于 2D的儿童,年龄2～14岁,随访至少2年(24月),观察其发生内斜视的可能性及内斜视矫正的情况。结果1.未被矫正的远视并不都过度使用调节引起集合过强而致内斜视;2.高度远视合并内斜视其内斜视的矫正满意度明显较中低度远视差;3.斜视矫正满意与否与发病到就诊时间明显相关;4.斜视矫正满意与否与弱视程度有关;5.斜视矫正满意与否与立体视有一定关系。结论影响内斜视的因素包括弱视程度,双眼视功能,屈光参差,远视的程度等。     

Accommodative esotropia following surgical treatment of infantile esotropia: frequency and risk factors

Purpose: We aimed to examine the frequency of and risk factors for the development of accommodative esotropia following surgical treatment for infantile esotropia. Methods: A total of 29 children were recruited. Potential risk factors for the development of accommodative esotropia included: sex; angle of deviation at initial and final visits; cycloplegic refractive error at initial and final visits; increase in hyperopia; amblyopia; amblyopia treatment; age at surgical treatment; pre‐ and postoperative latent nystagmus; dissociated vertical deviation or inferior oblique muscle overaction; additional surgical procedures; unstable alignment, and binocular sensory status. Results: Overall, 14 (48.2%) of 29 children developed accommodative esotropia during the 36‐ to 132‐month postoperative follow‐up period. Twelve (85.7%) of the 14 patients developed refractive accommodative esotropia and two developed non‐refractive accommodative esotropia. The onset of accommodative esotropia occurred at a mean of 8.8 months (range 6–24 months) after the initial surgical alignment. This corresponded to a mean age of onset for accommodative esotropia of 43.2 months. We determined that, among children with infantile esotropia, those who had hyperopia of ≥ 3.0 D and increasing hyperopia after surgery and those who did not develop dissociated vertical deviation during the follow‐up period were more likely to develop accommodative esotropia. Conclusions: Children who have the established risk factors should be followed closely for the development of accommodative esotropia. The treatment of these children with appropriate glasses may prevent the development of adverse effects of accommodative esotropia on sensory and motor functions.     

Use of atropine to predict the accommodative component in esotropia with hypermetropia

This cohort study included children with esotropia and hypermetropia of ≥ +2.0 diopters (D). The deviation was measured at presentation, under atropine cycloplegia and 3 months after full refractive correction. Of 44 children with a mean age of 5.2 ± 2.4 years, 25 were males. Eighteen (41%) had fully refractive accommodative esotropia (RAE), 10 (23%) had partial accommodative esotropia (PAE), and 5 (11%) had nonaccommodative esotropia (NAE). Eleven (25%) had convergence excess (CE). Under cycloplegia, all with RAE and RAE with CE had orthotropia. There was no significant change in the deviation in the patients with NAE. The deviation under cycloplegia and that with full refractive correction in PAE and PAE with CE (with +3.0 D addition) were not different. The intraclass correlation coefficient for deviation under cycloplegia and after full refractive correction (+3.0 D addition for CE) was 0.89. It was concluded that ocular deviation under cycloplegia can help to predict the accommodative component in esotropia with hypermetropia.     

调节性内斜视儿童双眼屈光差值的变化趋势及其对立体视的影响

目的研究调节性内斜视患者屈光差值的变化趋势和立体视的发展变化。方法回顾性研究。对有完整病历资料的屈光调节性内斜视儿童进行回顾性研究和总结。根据初始双眼屈光差值分为低度屈光差异组（双眼SE差≤1.0 D）、中度屈光差异组（1.0 D<双眼SE差<2.5 D）和高度屈光差异组（双眼SE差≥2.5 D）;根据初始视力情况分为双眼视力相等组和弱视组。对初始视力与初始屈光差值的关系进行独立样本t检验,对初始屈光差值随戴镜治疗时间的变化采用重复测量混合线性模型进行分析,对初始屈光差值与末次立体视进行卡方检验。结果在平均（6.8±2.8）年后,末次随访时87例（82.1%）屈光差值为低度,14例（13.2%）为中度,5例（4.7%）为高度。①不同视力组别间屈光差值差异有统计学意义（t=9.787,P<0.05）;②不同的屈光差异组间的末次立体视差异有统计学意义（χ2=18.785,P<0.01）;③戴镜后,随着年龄的增加3组屈光差值均有下降的趋势（F=142.913,P<0.01）。结论初始就诊时,调节性内斜视伴远视性屈光差异者,初始屈光差值越大,初始弱视眼视力越差,末次随访时获得的立体视越差。随戴镜时间增加,双眼屈光差值逐渐趋减。     

Weaning children with accommodative esotropia out of spectacles: a pilot study

BACKGROUND/AIM: Many children with accommodative esotropia must continue spectacle use throughout life. This study was undertaken to determine which factors are predictive of successfully weaning children with accommodative esotropia out of spectacles. METHODS: A retrospective review of 10 children with accommodative esotropia, who were gradually weaned from their hyperopic correction, and three age matched controls was performed. The main outcome measure was resolution or non-resolution of esotropia following weaning and eventual discontinuation of spectacles. Secondary outcome measures were final refractive error and the final esotropic or esophoric angle without correction. RESULTS: Six patients were successfully weaned from spectacles. At the completion of the weaning period one child was orthophoric and the other five children had well controlled esophorias. The other four patients remained spectacle dependent because of persistent esotropia or decreased vision without spectacles. The baseline and final refractive errors were significantly lower in the children successfully weaned from spectacles (p = 0.014). While the children who were successfully weaned from spectacles were older when initially diagnosed with accommodative esotropia (4.6 v 2.5 years), this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: Some children with accommodative esotropia may be weaned out of spectacles during the grade school years with resolution of their esotropia. It is likely that gradual reduction of the hyperopic correction increases divergence amplitudes, but it is unclear whether this facilitates emmetropisation.     

Refraction as a basis for screening children for squint and amblyopia.

+2-00 to +2-75 dioptres of spherical hypermetropia in the more emmetropic of a pair of eyes is significantly associated with esotropia (P less than 0-001) and the presence of amblyopia (P less than 0-01). Anisometropia is not significantly associated with esotropia (P = 0-31) unless there is spherical hypermetropia of +2-00 dioptres or more in the more emmetropic eye (P less than 0-001). Hypermetropic anisometropia of +1-00 DS or +1-00 D.Cyl. is associated with the presence of amblyopia (P less than 0-001). In the absence of esotropia there is also a significant association between the amount of anisometropia and the initial depth of amblyopia (P less than 0-01). The additional presence of esotropia increases the depth of amblyopia further (P less than 0-05) but not the incidence of amblyopia (P greater than 0-30). The level of significance of the association of refractive errors with squint/amblyopia was itself significantly higher (P less than 0-01) than that between a family history of squint or "lazy eye" on the one hand and squint and/or amblyopia on the other hand. 72 +/- 3% of all cases of esotropia and/or amblyopia in this sample of children had a refractive error of +2-00 DS or more spherical hypermetropia in the more emmetropic eye, or +1-00 D. or more spherical or cylindrical anisometropia. Since there is a close association between the refraction and how, when, and whether a child presents with squint and/or amblyopia, it would seem reasonable to reconsider refraction as a basis for screening young children for visual defects.     

屈光手术在成人斜视弱视领域中的应用

屈光手术包括角膜屈光手术和眼内屈光手术,不仅仅用来矫正单纯的屈光不正,其在治疗斜弱视领域也担任着重要角色。本文系统介绍了屈光手术在治疗儿童以及成人屈光参差性弱视以及调节性内斜视方面的一些研究进展,尤其是在治疗成人屈光参差性弱视和调节性内斜视方面,显示出独特的疗效,本文对此进行综述。     

Accommodative Esotropia Long Range Follow-up

Thirty-nine adult patients treated for typical (refractive) accommodative esotropia in childhood continue to have problems because they have not outgrown their hypermetropia, and the majority have not developed stable binocular vision. Their hypermetropia became maximal (median 5.7 diopters) by age 6, decreased in adolescence, and then stabilized (median 4 diopters). Thirty-eight of the 39 adults wear correcting lenses full-time. Nearly all depend on relaxed accommodation to maintain alignment when they remove their glasses. Ten patients, all of whom received treatment before a constant esotropia developed are essentially orthophoric with glasses and have normal binocular vision. The remainder have small-angle deviations with glasses, 14 with varying degrees of amblyopia and peripheral fusion and 15 with anomalous correspondence and suppression. As adults, only one patient with normal binocular function has required surgery whereas 13 of the patients lacking normal fusion have had surgery for increasing esotropia, postoperative exotropia, or consecutive exotropia.     

Treatment outcomes in refractive accommodative esotropia.

PURPOSE: To document and compare the clinical features and functional outcomes in patients with accommodative esotropia. To assess the efficacy of conventional management of accommodative esotropia, to determine functional outcomes of amblyopia and binocular vision, and to analyze possible risk factors involving the development of amblyopia. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 147 patients whose esotropia was corrected to within 10 prism diopters of orthotropia at both distance and near with use of full cycloplegic hyperopic correction. Multiple parameters were reviewed, including initial and final cycloplegic refraction, distance, and near deviation with and without glasses, stereoacuity, age of onset, and initiation of treatment, presence of anisometropia, and change in hyperopia. RESULTS: At presentation, 87 (59.2%) of the 147 patients were amblyopic, and anisometropia was found to be the only statistically significant risk factor for this (P = .001). Only 24.2% of these patients have stereo acuity between 40 and 100 sec/arc, 20.96% of patients have 200 to 800 sec/arc, and 22.58% of patients have 1980 to 3000 sec/arc; the remaining 32.26% had no stereo acuity. Fusion was achieved in 73.5% of the patients and later presentation (> 24 months) of esodeviation significantly determined their fusional ability (P = .031). Consecutive exotropia developed in 5.4 % of the patients an average of 5.5 years after institution of full optical correction. For clinical and functional outcomes we did not find any statistically significant difference between early onset (before 1 year old) and typical onset (2 to 3 years) age groups. The trend towards decreasing hyperopia was apparent, averaging -0.16 +/- 0.20 diopters annually in 80.5% of the patients with at least 5 years follow-up, although 23% of patients still had 20/40 or worse visual acuity in the amblyopic eye. CONCLUSIONS: Amblyopia is a commonly associated finding at presentation for patients with accommodative esotropia. Most of the patients developed good fusion but poor stereopsis at the end of treatment.     

儿童部分调节性内斜视的治疗及调整缝线在手术中的应用

目的 探讨儿童部分调节性内斜视的术前治疗、手术时机与手术量以及调整缝线在治疗中的应用。设计 回顾性病例系列。研究对象 北京儿童医院眼科接受手术治疗的部分调节性内斜视患者30例。方法 对手术治疗的部分调节性内斜视患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。患儿术前矫正屈光异常,观察斜视度稳定,并予适当弱视治疗,在双眼视力相当的情况下进行手术,按照裸眼和戴镜斜视度的平均值设计手术量。术中常规使用调整缝线技术,术后早期依据眼位情况决定是否需要调整。术后随访6~15个月。观察眼位及双眼视功能。主要指标 术后眼位、双眼视功能、眼位调整情况。结果 有3例患儿进行了眼位调整,均为过矫,避免了二次手术。末次随访时30例患者中26例（87%）眼位在正位~+8△之间,4例（13%）眼位+10△~+15△。术前能合作行双眼视功能检查者19例,有双眼视功能者2例（11%）。末次随访时能合作双眼视功能检查者21例,有双眼视功能者15例（71%）。结论  内斜视伴有调节因素时应及时全矫配镜,在残余斜视度稳定、双眼矫正视力基本相当后应尽早手术。手术设计根据戴镜与裸眼视近的平均斜视度,调整缝线有助于保证术后早期的眼位满意,降低了二次手术的风险。（眼科, 2013,22: 121-123）     

Risk factors for abnormal binocular vision after successful alignment of accommodative esotropia.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify clinical factors associated with abnormal binocular vision outcomes among children with accommodative esotropia (ET) whose eyes were successfully realigned with spectacles only or with spectacles and surgery. METHODS: The participants were 69 children with accommodative ET who were followed up prospectively from the time of diagnosis. Clinical factors examined in this study included high accommodative convergence-to-accommodation (AC/A) relationship, high hyperopia, anisometropia, age of onset, and duration of eye misalignment. Binocular vision was assessed using measures of stereopsis, fusional vergence, sensory foveal fusion, and motion visual-evoked potential (mVEP). RESULTS: Children with a high AC/A relationship are 2.2 times more likely to have an absence of fusional vergence than are children with a normal AC/A relationship. Children having a duration of constant eye misalignment >/= 4 months before being successfully treated are 4.6 times more likely to have abnormal stereopsis, 33 times more likely to have no stereopsis, 37 times more likely to have an absence of fusional vergence, 31 times more likely to have an absence of sensory foveal fusion, and 17 times more likely to have an asymmetric mVEP response than children with a duration of constant ET diagnosed at 0 to 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Following successful eye alignment, as many as 75% of patients with accommodative ET had anomalous binocular vision. A high AC/A relationship poses a significant risk for abnormal fusional vergence only. A constant eye misalignment lasting >/= 4 months poses a significant risk for anomalous binocular vision on all measures studied.     

Accommodative convergence in hypermetropia

We compared the clinical characteristics of esotropic, hypermetropic children whose strabismus was fully corrected with spectacles (refractive accommodative esotropia) with those who remained orthotropic (that is, had no manifest strabismus on the cover test) in the presence of uncorrected hypermetropia. In addition to a standard ophthalmologic and orthoptic examination, we determined the stimulus accommodative convergence/accommodation (AC/A) ratio by using the gradient method over a range of 6 diopters, the near point of accommodation, and random dot stereopsis. Hypermetropic patients without esotropia or significant esophoria were found to have a low AC/A ratio in contrast to those patients with refractive accommodative esotropia. This finding explains why esodeviations may be absent in some hypermetropic patients with uncorrected vision. We found a high prevalence of abnormally low near points of accommodation and defective or absent stereopsis in both groups of patients.     

The accommodative element in accommodative esotropia

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of reducing the hyperopic correction on the state of binocular accommodative response in fully accommodative esotropia and to determine the "comfortable" amount of reduction in hyperopic correction. DESIGN: A cohort study. METHODS: Hyperopic corrections of children with a baseline refractive error of +1.50 to +5.0 diopters were gradually reduced in 0.50-diopter increments. Binocular accommodative ability was assessed by dynamic retinoscopy (monocular estimate method). Similar binocular accommodative responses were ascertained among patients with a baseline hyperopic correction of < or =3.0 of hyperopia and >3.0 of hyperopia, and patients were divided into two groups, group 1 (13 patients) and group 2 (18 patients), accordingly. RESULTS: After a reduction of 2.0 diopters in group 1 and 1.0 diopter in group 2, there was a decrease in accommodative response initially in the nondominant eye, accompanied by the dominant eye with a further reduction of 0.50 diopter. To overcome the bilateral accommodative lag, a reinstatement of a 0.50-diopter stronger hyperopic correction was required. Patients in group 1 tolerated a mean undercorrection of 2.37 diopters, and 77% were weaned from their spectacles. All of the children in group 2 were dependent upon spectacles at the completion of the study period. The final spectacle worn was a median of -1.67 diopters less than their full cycloplegic refraction. CONCLUSIONS: A complete binocular accommodative ability seems to be a prerequisite for the establishment of "comfortable" hyperopic undercorrections. It does not seem to be a reasonable approach to consider further reductions in hyperopic correction in the presence of a bilateral decreased accommodative performance.     

A family of squints: the differing effects of hypermetropia on four siblings

Four siblings in a family of five were found to be affected with hypermetropia in differing degrees and with differing effects. These were unilateral hypermetropia, producing amblyopia; hypermetropia inducing an accommodative esotropia with minimal amblyopia and fully controlled with glasses; hypermetropia producing an accommodative esotropia with a high AC/A ratio, fully controlled with bifocals; and hypermetropia producing esotropia which was only partially corrected with glasses, therefore partially accommodative, with a residual squint which required surgery. This family of four nicely demonstrates all the permutations and combinations possible in accommodative-type esotropia and the pitfalls therein.     

The epidemiology of early childhood hyperopia.

Hyperopia is present in a small proportion of children aged between 6 and 12 months, with ethnicity likely affecting prevalence, and higher prevalences in certain subgroups, especially those with a family history of hyperopia or accommodative esotropia. Around a fifth of children who are hyperopic in infancy go on to develop strabismus, while an unknown proportion develop bilateral ametropic amblyopia; persistent hyperopia appears to be a harbinger of future pathology. Early prophylactic spectacle correction of hyperopia has failed to prevent strabismus in three of four studies, but showed reduced incidence of strabismus in one study, and yielded improved visual acuity outcomes in two studies by one investigator. Currently our ability to detect or measure refractive error with automated instruments easily adaptable to a screening setting has outpaced our knowledge of how best to identify the subset of hyperopes who are really at risk, and how to manage isolated early hyperopia once it has been identified.     

屈光性调节性内斜视的眼位回退因素分析

为了探讨屈光性调节性内斜视眼位回退的因素，我们对１３７例随访５年以上的屈光性调节性内斜视进行分析。随访期间，２３例戴完全矫正眼镜者不能再控制内科，出现了调节性内斜视的眼位回退，眼位回退发生率为１６．８％。结果表明：抗调节治疗晚和双眼单视功能不良者易发生眼位回退，斜视发生年龄、屈光状态和双眼视力参差大小与眼位回退发生无关。及早发现并配戴屈光矫正眼镜和维持正常的双眼单视功能是防止眼位回退发生的关键。