Comparison of root resorption between self-ligating and conventional preadjusted brackets using cone beam computed tomography

Objective:To compare the magnitude of external apical root resorption (EARR) of incisors in patients undergoing the initial phase of orthodontic treatment with two sets of brackets.Materials and Methods:According to the results of the power analysis for sample size calculation, 19 Angle Class I patients (anterior crowding: 3 to 5 mm; mean age: 20.6 years) were included in the study and randomly divided into two groups: group I (n  =  11, self-ligating brackets) and group II (n  =  8, conventional preadjusted brackets). The degree of EARR was detected in 152 upper and lower incisors by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and a three-dimensional program (Dolphin 11.5, Dolphin Imaging & Management Solutions, Chatsworth, Calif) with 25% level of sensitivity. The CBCT scans were obtained before (T1) and 6 months after initiation of treatment (T2). Differences between and within groups were analyzed by nonpaired and paired t-test, respectively, with 5% significance level.Results:Significant differences were found for both groups between T1 and T2. However, no differences in the degree of EARR were detected between the groups studied.Conclusions:Although EARR has occurred in all teeth evaluated, the bracket design (self-ligating or conventional) did not demonstrate any influence on the results observed.     

A comparative study of the effect of the intrusion arch and straight wire mechanics on incisor root resorption: A randomized,controlled trial

Objective:To analyze and compare external apical root resorption (EARR) of maxillary incisors treated by intrusion arch or continuous archwire mechanics.Materials and Methods:This cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) study analyzed 28 deep bite patients in the permanent dentition who were randomly divided into two groups: Group 1, 12 patients with initial mean age of 15.1 ± 1.6 years and mean overbite of 4.6 ± 1.2 mm treated with the Connecticut intrusion arch (CIA) in the upper arch (Ortho Organizers, Carlsbad, Calif) for a mean period of 5.8 ± 1.27 months. Group 2, 16 patients with initial mean age of 22.1 ± 5.7 years and mean overbite of 4.1 ± 1.1 mm treated with conventional leveling and alignment using continuous archwire mechanics for 6.1 ± 0.81 months. The degree of EARR was detected in 112 maxillary incisors by using CBCT scans and a three-dimensional program (Dolphin 11.7, Dolphin Imaging & Management Solutions, Chatsworth, Calif). The CBCT scans were obtained before (T1) and 6 months after initiation of treatment (T2). Differences between and within groups were assessed by nonpaired and paired t-tests, respectively, with a 5% significance level.Results:Significant differences were found for both groups between T1 and T2 (P < .05) indicating that EARR occurred in both groups. However, there were no significant differences when EARR was compared between group 1 (−0.76 mm) and group 2 (−0.59 mm).Conclusions:The Connecticut intrusion arch did not lead to greater EARR of maxillary incisors when compared with conventional orthodontic mechanics.     

Volumetric cone-beam computed tomography evaluation and risk factor analysis of external apical root resorption with clear aligner therapy

ObjectivesTo investigate the prevalence and severity of external apical root resorption (EARR) volumetrically with clear aligner therapy using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) as well as determine the possible risk factors and develop a prediction model for EARR.Materials and MethodsIn this retrospective study, 320 incisors from 40 Class II patients treated with aligners (Invisalign) were included in this study. CBCT images were obtained at pretreatment (T0) and posttreatment (T1). Root volume was calculated by three-dimensional reconstruction of CBCT images, and apical tooth movement was measured from superimposed CBCT images. Changes in root volume were compared using paired t-tests, and the relationship between root volume loss and potential risk factors was analyzed by multiple linear regression.ResultsAll of the measured incisors showed root volume loss, with an average of 11.48 ± 6.70 mm³, and the prevalence of severe resorption was 0.625%. The prediction model for EARR included variables of posttreatment sagittal root position (SRP), extraction, tooth type, and apical intrusion and extrusion displacements, with an R² of 0.51. Age, sex, duration, pretreatment SRP, attachment, advancement, and retraction movements were excluded from the model.ConclusionsMost incisors showed mild to moderate resorption during aligner treatment; only a minimal percentage showed severe resorption. Posttreatment SRP (which showed the highest association with EARR), extraction, tooth type, and apical intrusion and extrusion displacements were risk factors for EARR.     

自锁矫治与传统矫治对牙根吸收的影响

目的:探讨自锁托槽轻力矫治是否可以减轻对牙根的吸收。方法:选取临床治疗的安氏Ⅰ、Ⅱ类拥挤并拔除4颗第一前磨牙病例30例,分为2组。其中,15例使用Damon 3MX自锁托槽矫治(自锁组),15例使用传统结扎式直丝托槽矫治(结扎组)。2组资料矫治前在性别、年龄、拥挤度及错类型等指标上具有可比性。通过矫治前、后的模型及全口曲面体层片,测量计算2组矫治后上、下切牙牙根吸收量,应用SPSS19.0软件包对数据进行t检验分析。结果:①上颌中切牙牙根吸收自锁组为(2.05±1.51)mm,结扎组为(2.08±1.21)mm,差异无显著性(P=0.973>0.05)。②上颌侧切牙牙根吸收自锁组为(1.77±1.01)mm,结扎组为(1.91±1.59)mm,差异无显著性(P=0.848>0.05)。③下颌中切牙牙根吸收自锁组为(2.06±1.62)mm,结扎组为(1.98±1.50)mm,差异无显著性(P=0.926>0.05)。④下颌侧切牙牙根吸收自锁组为(1.94±1.45)mm,结扎组为(1.84±1.17)mm,差异无显著性(P=0.888>0.05)。结论:在拔牙正畸中,自锁矫治并未表现出比传统结扎矫治更少的牙根吸收。     

Evaluation of maxillary central incisors on the noncleft and cleft sides in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate—Part 2: Relationship between root resorption,horizontal tooth movement,and quantity of grafted autogenous bone

Objective:To evaluate the relationship between external apical root resorption (EARR) of the maxillary central incisors (U1), horizontal orthodontic tooth movement, and quantity of grafted bone in subjects with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) over an average duration of 8 years.Materials and Methods:Thirty subjects with UCLP were evaluated for EARR of U1 after edgewise treatment (T2). The teeth were classified as having no EARR, moderate EARR (combined into “no/moderate” EARR), or severe EARR. Frontal cephalometric radiographs acquired at eruption of U1 (T0), less than 6 months before secondary alveolar bone grafting (T1), and T2 were evaluated to determine the horizontal inclination (U1-axis angle) and distance of the root apex from the median line (U1-root–VL distance). On the cleft side, the quantities of grafted bone at less than 12 months postsecondary bone grafting and at T2 were evaluated using the alveolar bone graft (ABG) scale.Results:Cleft-adjacent teeth exhibited more severe EARR than did teeth on the noncleft side. The cleft side exhibited greater changes in U1-axis angle and U1-root–VL distance between T0 and T2 than did the noncleft side. On the cleft side, the ABG score at T2 in the severe EARR group was significantly lower than that in the no/moderate EARR group. These measurements were correlated with EARR grade.Conclusions:Cleft-adjacent U1 exhibited more severe EARR than did the U1 on the noncleft side, which might be associated with orthodontic treatment-induced changes in horizontal inclination and root apex movement. On the cleft side, severity of EARR may be correlated with the success of ABG.     

Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography for detecting simulated apical root resorption

Objective:To compare the diagnostic accuracy between cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and periapical radiography for detecting simulated external apical root resorption (EARR) in vitro.Materials and Methods:The study sample consisted of 160 single-rooted premolar teeth for simulating EARR of varying degrees according to four setups: no (intact teeth), mild (cavity of 1.0 mm in diameter and depth on root surface), moderate (0.4 mm, 0.8 mm, 1.2 mm, and 1.6 mm root shortening), and severe (2.4 mm, 2.8 mm, 3.2 mm, and 3.6 mm root shortening). Two groups of radiographic images were obtained via CBCT and periapical radiography. The absence or presence and the severity for all resorption lesions were evaluated blindly by two calibrated observers.Results:With the CBCT method, the rates of correct classification of no, mild, moderate, and severe EARR were 96.3%, 98.8%, 41.3%, and 87.5%, respectively; with the periapical radiography method, the rates were 82.5%, 41.3%, 68.8%, and 92.5%, respectively. Highly significant differences were found between the two imaging methods for detection of mild (P < .001), moderate (P < .001), and all EARR (P < .001). For detection of all EARR, the sensitivity and specificity values were 75.8% and 96.3% for CBCT, compared with 67.5% and 82.5% for periapical radiography.Conclusion:CBCT is a reliable diagnostic tool to detect simulated EARR, whereas periapical radiography underestimates it. However, if a periapical radiograph is already available to the diagnosis of EARR, CBCT should be used with extreme caution to avoid additional radiation exposure.     

Contact of the incisive canal and upper central incisors causing root resorption after retraction with orthodontic mini-implants: A CBCT study

Objectives:To explore risk factors for contact between the incisive canal (IC) and upper central incisors (U1) and to evaluate the relationship between contact and root resorption using cone-beam computer tomography (CBCT).Materials and Methods:This retrospective study used CBCT data of 33 patients treated by a senior orthodontist. Anterior teeth were retracted with mini-implants, and CBCT scans were taken before and after retraction. IC height and width, U1 lingual movement, and U1-IC distance and root length decrease were compared between contact and noncontact groups.Results:Sixteen U1 roots in 11 patients touched the IC. The contact group had lower positioned ICs (2.86 ± 1.10 mm) than the noncontact group (4.07 ± 1.72 mm). The middle of the U1 roots showed more lingual movement to ICs in the contact group (2.30 ± 1.20 mm) than in the noncontact group (1.07 ± 1.16 mm). Right central incisors were closer to the IC than were the left. Root length decreased significantly more in the contact group (2.63 ± 0.93 mm) than in the noncontact group (1.14 ± 0.83 mm).Conclusions:There is a risk for the U1 root to contact the IC during anterior retraction when the IC is lower positioned. This contact might cause external apical root resorption.     

正畸牙移动早期牙根吸收的临床研究

目的 应用锥体束计算机断层(Cone beam computed tomography,CBCT)技术分析正畸牙移动早期牙根吸收的发生情况及其影响因素.方法 选择108例正畸患者,432颗上切牙,治疗前及治疗5～9个月,平均(6.9±1.24)个月后分别拍摄上颌4个切牙CBCT.记录患者性别、初诊年龄、拔牙与否、安氏分...     

External apical root resorption in Class II malocclusion: a retrospective review of 1- versus 2-phase treatment.

External apical root resorption (EARR) is an imperfectly understood problem of orthodontic treatment. The records of 138 children with Class II malocclusion (overjet > 7 mm) participating in a randomized clinical trial of early orthodontic treatment were reviewed. The patients were treated in either 1 phase with fixed appliances only (n = 49) or 2 phases with headgear (n = 49) or bionator (n = 40) followed by fixed appliances. The 3 groups were similar in age, sex, and malocclusion severity at enrollment. The records examined included anamnestic data, clinical examination records, panoramic radiographs before and after fixed appliance therapy, and posttreatment periapical radiographs. All radiographs were reviewed and scored independently by 2 examiners for maxillary incisor root development, morphology, and EARR. Of the 532 incisors scored, 11% of central and 14% of lateral incisors demonstrated moderate to severe (>2 mm) EARR. The proportion of incisors with moderate to severe EARR was slightly greater in the 1-phase treatment group. There was no difference in the incidence of EARR between teeth that had had trauma and those that had not, and there was only a slight increase in frequency of root resorption in teeth with unusual root morphology. Significant associations exist among EARR, the magnitude of overjet reduction, and the time spent wearing fixed appliances. However, not all incisors in a child respond in the same way, so other variables must play a role in determining the root response to orthodontic forces.     

Effect of the inclination of a maxillary central incisor on periodontal stress: Finite element analysis

Objective:To determine the effect of labiolingual inclination of a maxillary central incisor on the magnitude and distribution of stresses within the periodontal space.Materials and Methods:Five three-dimensional finite element models of a right maxillary central incisor were created with 0°, 10°, 20°, 30°, and 40° inclination. Each incisor model was subjected to a 1 N lingual-directed force and 6–12 N·mm countertipping moment on the labial surface. The stress level within the periodontal ligament was calculated in terms of maximum principal stresses.Results:With increased inclination, compressive stresses tended to increase whereas tensile stresses tended to decrease. The location where compressive stress was prevalent changed from the midroot area to the apical area on the lingual side, while the area where tensile stresses were predominant changed from the midroot area to the cervical area on the labial side.Conclusion:There are more compressive stresses concentrated at the apex of incisors with a high degree of inclination than in incisors that are more upright. This may be associated with the higher clinical incidence of apical root resorption found in inclined maxillary central incisors.     

Root resorption diagnosed with cone beam computed tomography after 6 months of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance and the relation to risk factors

Objectives:To investigate root resorption after 6 months of active orthodontic treatment and its relation to possible risk factors.Materials and Methods:Ninety-seven patients (10–18 years) with a Class I malocclusion and crowding treated with fixed appliance and premolar extractions were examined with cone beam computed tomography before and after 6 months of active treatment. The exposure covered all teeth from first molar to first molar in both jaws. The Malmgren index was used to evaluate the degree of root resorption. Irregular root contour (score 1) was seen in most teeth already before active treatment, and therefore resorptions were registered only as score 2 (<2 mm, minor resorption) or higher.Results:Minor root resorption was noted in 10% of the patients and severe root resorption, >2 mm (score 3) was found in four patients. Root resorption was more frequently seen in the upper jaw, especially the incisors. There was no statistically significant correlation of root resorption with any of the selected risk factors.Conclusions:After 6 months of treatment, clinically significant resorption was diagnosed in 4% of the patients, ie, in 96% of the patients the radiographic examination did not reveal any significant information. The selected risk factors did not have any impact on the amount of resorption after 6 months of active treatment.     

A radiographic analysis of external apical root resorption of maxillary incisors during active orthodontic treatment

External apical root resorption (EARR) is an undesirable consequence of orthodontic treatment. The purpose of this study was to measure the amount of EARR and to examine its clinical significance in maxillary incisors, during a 12-month active treatment period. A further aim was to examine the contribution of gender, treatment technique, treatment duration, and extraction of maxillary first premolars to EARR. The sample comprised 151 maxillary incisor teeth in 40 patients (16 males, 24 females) aged 12-22 years, with different malocclusions. Standard periapical radiographs, using the long-cone paralleling technique, were obtained before and 6 and 12 months after the start of treatment. Quantitative measurements for 80 central and 71 lateral maxillary incisors were performed separately and corrected for image distortion. Root length reduction was calculated in millimetres and in terms of the percentage of the original root length. Resorption of more than 1 mm at 12 months of active treatment was considered to be clinically significant. On average, the degree of EARR for the maxillary central incisors was 0.77 +/- 0.42 and 1.67 +/- 0.64 mm, respectively, during the 6- and 12-month follow-up (P < 0.001). For the lateral incisors, the degree of EARR was 0.88 +/- 0.51 and 1.79 +/- 0.66 mm, respectively (P < 0.001). Clinically significant resorption was found for 74 per cent of the centrals and 82 per cent of the laterals. No significant correlation was observed between EARR and treatment technique. EARR was found to be correlated with gender for the lateral incisors. The effect of treatment duration (P < 0.001) and premolar extraction (P < 0.001) was statistically significant for both tooth groups.     

自锁托槽和传统托槽对上颌切牙牙根外吸收影响的回顾性研究

目的：评价自锁托槽和传统托槽在正畸治疗中对牙根外吸收的影响。方法：选取南京同仁医院口腔科矫治结束的固定正畸患者72例为研究对象,36例采用自锁托槽,36例采用传统托槽。对不同托槽组的临床资料进行描述性分析,并根据正畸治疗前后全颌曲面断层片和记存模型,测量计算出不同托槽的牙根外吸收量,进一步以牙根外吸收量为因变量,对临床相关因素包括托槽的类别、疗程、性别、减数与否、年龄进行回归分析。结果：两组患者问的疗程、性别、减数与否、年龄的临床统计资料,其两组间分布无差异;治疗疗程对牙根外吸收的影响有显著意义,自锁托槽在对牙根外吸收的影响方面与传统托槽相比有增加的趋势,但无统计学差异（P=0．06）。结论：无论是自锁托槽还是传统托槽,均可造成切牙根外吸收,治疗疗程对牙根外吸收的影响有显著意义,自锁托槽对正畸治疗过程中牙根外吸收的影响与传统托槽相比,有增加趋势,但无统计学差异。     

Tooth root and alveolar bone grey values derived from cone-beam CT imaging in maxillary incisor teeth with and without apical root resorption

Introduction: In orthodontic treatment, an increased bone mineral density of the alveolar bone is considered as a risk factor for apical root resorption (ARR), whereas the mineral density of cementum has been associated with root protection against resorption.

Methods: This study aimed at evaluating the grey values (GVs) of the apical third of the root and of the alveolar bone adjacent to maxillary incisors with and without ARR in orthodontic patients. Twenty-one patients under treatment who presented one incisor with ARR and its corresponding contralateral without ARR were selected and submitted to cone-beam computed tomography. GVs were evaluated on the images obtained of four areas of the apical third of the root and of four areas of the adjacent alveolar bone.

Results and Conclusions: The radicular tissue of the apical third of the incisors with ARR showed greater root GV (p?p?相似文献   

External apical root resorption in maxillary root-filled incisors after orthodontic treatment: a split-mouth design study

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare, in a split mouth design, the external apical root resorption (EARR) associated with orthodontic treatment in root-filled maxillary incisors and their contralateral teeth with vital pulps. Methodology: The study sample consisted of 38 patients (14 males and 24 females), who had one root-filled incisor before completion of multiband/bracket orthodontic therapy for at least 1 year. For each patient, digital panoramic radiographs taken before and after orthodontic treatment were used to determine the root resortion and the proportion of external root resorption (PRR), defined as the ratio between the root resorption in the endodontically treated incisor and that in its contralateral incisor with a vital pulp. The student’s t-test, chi-square test and logistic regression analysis were used to determine statistical significance. Results: There was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) between EARR in vital teeth (1.1 ± 1.0 mm) and endodontically treated incisors (1.1 ± 0.8 mm). Twenty-six patients (68.4%) showed greater resorption of the endodontically treated incisor than its homolog vital tooth (p > 0.05). The mean and standard deviation of PPR were 1.0 ± 0.2. Multivariate logistic regression suggested that PRR does not correlate with any of the variables analyzed. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the amount or severity of external root resorption during orthodontic movement between root-filled incisors and their contralateral teeth with vital pulps. Key words:Endodontics, orthodontics, root canal treatment, root resorption.     

Apical root resorption due to orthodontic treatment detected by cone beam computed tomography

Objective:To determine the frequency of apical root resorption (ARR) due to orthodontic treatment using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in a sample of 1256 roots from 30 patients.Materials and Methods:All patients had Class I malocclusion with crowding. Of the 30 patients evaluated, 11 were boys and 19 were girls; their mean age was 13 years (11 to 16 years). Orthodontic treatment followed the nonextraction treatment. CBCT images were obtained before and after orthodontic treatment, and ARR was determined using Axial Guided Navigation of CBCT images.Results:All patients had ARR. No statistically significant association was found between resorption frequency, gender, and age. ARR was detected using CBCT in 46% of all roots that underwent orthodontic treatment.Conclusions:CBCT was effective for detecting in vivo even minimal degrees of ARR due to orthodontic treatment and allowed three-dimensional evaluation of dental roots and visualization of palatine roots of maxillary molars. The highest frequencies and the most significant ARR occurred in incisors and distal roots of first maxillary and mandibular molars.     

牙周炎患者排齐整平阶段牙根吸收的比较研究

目的:比较研究牙周炎患者和牙周健康患者在正畸治疗的排齐整平阶段牙根吸收的情况。方法:选择成年错牙合畸形患者60例,轻度牙周炎患者和牙周健康者各30例,均不需拔牙,MBT直丝弓固定矫治,排挤整平过程中不同时间点:0个月(T0)、1个月(T1)、6个月(T2),分别拍摄两组病例上下前牙的数字化平行定位投照根尖片,统计各牙不同时期的牙根长度X0、X1、X2,及牙根吸收量X(0-1)和X(0-2)。结果:实验组和对照组在T1和T2期,均发生很轻微的牙根吸收,但两组间不同时间点牙根吸收量X(0-2)、X(0-1),差异无统计学意义。结论:MBT正畸治疗的不拔牙病例排齐整平阶段中,牙周炎患者和牙周健康患者均会发生很轻微(都小于1 mm)牙根吸收,但二者之间牙根吸收量无差异。     

Apical root resorption in patients treated with comprehensive orthodontics

External apical root resorption (EARR) is a common--but seldom extreme--consequence of orthodontic treatment. Incisors are most at risk, perhaps because of their single roots and because they typically are moved farther than other teeth. We followed a cohort of patients (n = 153) treated with comprehensive orthodontics. EARR was scored on the upper incisors with a qualitative five-grade ordinal scale. There was no EARR at the start of treatment, but most (> 80%) exhibited slight-to-moderate EARR by the end of treatment (i.e., a loss of 1-2 mm). Cases treated with premolar extractions experienced more EARR because their incisors were retracted farther; however, the sum of the effects of patients' sex and age, and severity of the malocclusion, and the kind of mechanics used accounts for little of the overall variation in EARR. Instead, it appears that genetically-based inter-individual variation in susceptibility to EARR is the most influential factor. Research should be directed at understanding the biochemical nature of susceptibility so prospective patients can be screened to identify those at particular risk.     

Tooth and bone changes after initial anterior dental alignment using preformed vs customized nickel titanium archwires in adults: A randomized clinical trial

Objectives:To compare tooth movement achieved, time required for alignment, root resorption, and alveolar bone thickness changes during initial dental alignment between groups treated with 0.012-inch preformed heat-activated or customized nickel titanium (NiTi) archwires.Materials and Methods:Thirty-two subjects (mean age 19.8 ± 1.7 years) with severe crowding of maxillary anterior teeth had premolar extractions and were randomly allocated into control and experimental groups receiving preformed heat-activated and customized NiTi archwires, respectively. Limited field of view cone-beam computed tomographies were taken initially (T₀) and three months after final alignment (T_F) to evaluate bone changes. Digital model analysis assessed tooth movement at monthly intervals. Time to achieve alignment was assessed in months. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Mann–Whitney U-tests were used to compare changes within and between groups, as appropriate.Results:Central incisor tooth movement was significantly different (all P ≤ .003) between groups at all time points. T_F-T₀ showed labial movement (0.75 ± 1.42 mm) in the control group and palatal movement (−0.96 ± 0.41 mm) in the experimental group. The experimental compared to control group showed significantly more canine distal movement (0.60 ± 0.28 mm; P ≤ .049), less labial bone thickness changes (P ≤ .004), less root resorption of the central and lateral incisors (P ≤ .007), and a longer time to achieve alignment (P = .01).Conclusions:The experimental group exhibited palatal movement of the central incisors, more canine distal movement with less bone thickness changes, and less root resorption but took more time to achieve alignment than the control group.     

Root resorption during orthodontic treatment with self-ligating or conventional brackets: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The aim of this study was to compare the external apical root resorption (EARR) in patients receiving fixed orthodontic treatment with self-ligating or conventional brackets.

Methods

Studies comparing the EARR between orthodontic patients using self-ligating or conventional brackets were identified through electronic search in databases including CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and SIGLE, and manual search in relevant journals and reference lists of the included studies until Apr 2016. The extraction of data and risk of bias evaluation were conducted by two investigators independently. The original outcome underwent statistical pooling by using Review Manager 5.

Results

Seven studies were included in the systematic review, out of which, five studies were statistically pooled in meta-analysis. The value of EARR of maxillary central incisors in the self-ligating bracket group was significantly lower than that in the conventional bracket group (SMD ?0.31; 95% CI: ?0.60–?0.01). No significant differences in other incisors were observed between self?ligating and conventional brackets.

Conclusions

Current evidences suggest self-ligating brackets do not outperform conventional brackets in reducing the EARR in maxillary lateral incisors, mandible central incisors and mandible lateral incisors. However, self-ligating brackets appear to have an advantage in protecting maxillary central incisor from EARR, which still needs to be confirmed by more high-quality studies.