Neoral induction in pediatric renal transplantation

Neoral was instituted in pediatric renal transplant patients with the hypothesis it would have more predictable kinetics than Sandimmun. However, significant questions have arisen concerning potential toxicity and dosing interval related to its rapid absorption with subsequent high initial peak. This is compounded by the fact that children appear to metabolize cyclosporine at a greater rate than adults. This combination of a rapid peak and rapid absorption may then result in lower trough levels at 12 h. We compared the trough cyclosporine levels of nine children who received Neoral with nine who received Sandimmun at the time of initial transplantation. More frequent dosing (every 8 h) was required in the Neoral population compared with the Sandimmun population for the 1st month in order to obtain comparable trough levels. Beyond the initial 4–6 weeks, trough levels were similar for Neoral and Sandimmun. Whereas 1-month creatinine levels and blood pressures were similar, the number of blood pressure medications was significantly higher in the Neoral group. At 5.5 ± 1.1 months’ followup, a single patient in the current Neoral group and in the retrospective Sandimmun group each experienced a single OKT3 allograft-treated rejection. We suggest that the area under the curve is different in Neoral than Sandimmun, and the initial dosing frequency may need to be adjusted accordingly. Received August 21, 1996; received in revised form June 27, 1997; accepted June 30, 1997     

Comparison of Neoral and Sandimmun cyclosporin A pharmacokinetic profiles in young renal transplant recipients

A major factor influencing whole blood cyclosporin A levels in young children with renal transplants is the variable absorption of Sandimmun (SIM). Neoral (NEO) is a new microemulsion of cyclosporin A (CYA) that has been reported to have better absorption characteristics. We compared the pharmacokinetics of SIM and NEO in nine renal transplant recipients aged less than 11 years (range 4.8 – 10.9 years) and observed clinical parameters during 6 months of NEO therapy. Median CYA dosage was 149 mg/m² per day (range 98 – 226). We observed an increase in the maximum CYA concentration (C_max) of 114%, an increase in area under the curve (AUC) of 71% and the time to reach C_max was reduced from 1.75 h to 1.25 h with NEO, while 12-h trough levels (C12 h) did not change significantly. AUC correlated with C12 h for SIM (r ² = 0.833) and NEO (r ² = 0.699) and also C1.5 h for NEO (r ² = 0.775). During 24 weeks’ follow-up, the coefficient of variation of CYA levels was lower for NEO (13%) than for SIM (20%). Although CYA dosages at the start and the end of 6 months on NEO were similar, only one patient was maintained on a constant dose. Four patients had acute reversible rises in plasma creatinine which responded to a 11% reduction in NEO dose; their increase in AUC was greater than those patients not showing a rise in plasma creatinine. Overall, median plasma creatinine was unchanged at the end of the study. NEO was well tolerated by the patients; temporary nausea and headache were experienced by three patients and one of them stopped NEO after 20 days. Other biochemical parameters were not significantly different on NEO. Received May 28, 1996; received in revised form and accepted October 24, 1996     

Safety and tolerability of a new oral formulation of cyclosporin A, Sandimmun Neoral, in renal transplant patients

Abstract The current therapy with Sandimmun has been improved by the development of a new oral formulation of its active ingredient, Cyclosporine A and which is called Sandimmun Neoral. This new galenical formulation is based on the microemulsion technology and offers consistent oral absorption and pharmacokinetic predictability. In two studies of a 12 weeks duration each and including 466 stable renal transplant patients and 86 new renal transplant patients it was shown that Sandimmun Neoral is as well tolerated and as safe as Sandimmun. Stable renal transplant patients currently receiving Sandimmun can safely be switched to Sandimmun Neoral on a 1:1 dose level basis. However, as a result of the more consistent absorption of Sandimmun Neoral, poor absorbers with Sandimmun will become normal absorbers and than will need a considerable dose reduction to reach the same Cyclosporine A exposure. In new renal transplant patients kidney function seems to improve better and faster when Sandimmun Neoral is given as shown by creatinine and creatinine clearance values. In the Sandimmun Neoral group less patients experienced a rejection episode and time free of rejection was longer, this may reflect a better maintenance of immunosuppression. In addition, considerably lower doses (16% on average) are required for Sandimmun Neoral to achieve comparable cyclosporine A blood trough levels and these patients are also sooner stabilized in terms of Cyclosporine a therapy.     

Excellent clinical outcomes in primary kidney transplant recipients treated with steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression

Steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression is desirable to eliminate the side effects of chronic corticosteroid use. Complete steroid avoidance or rapid post-transplant steroid withdrawal has recently been used in renal transplant recipients with encouraging results. The present study evaluated the outcome of a steroid-free maintenance immunosuppressive protocol in kidney transplant recipients with at least one-yr follow up. Between April 2002 and October 2004, a total of 301 primary kidney transplant recipients received steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression. The regimen consisted of induction with thymogobulin and prednisone for the first five d. Patients were maintained on Sirolimus and Neoral. Neoral dose was adjusted to target C2 levels and the Sirolimus dose was adjusted to a target rapamycin trough level. All primary kidney transplants (n = 502) performed in the two yr (starting January 2000) prior to institution of the steroid-free regimen and thus maintained on a steroid-based immunosuppressive protocol were used for comparison. One-year patient and death censored graft survival were 93.1% and 98.1% for the steroid-free group vs. 95.2% and 95.2% for the comparator groups (p = ns). The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 4.9% in the steroid-free group vs. 9.4% in the comparator group (p < 0.01). Two (0.7%) of 301 patients in the steroid-free group lost their grafts because of acute rejection compared with nine (1.8%) patients in the comparator group (p < 0.05). At one-yr post-transplant the mean serum creatinine level was not different between the two groups. There were no significant differences in mean serum cholesterol and triglycerides levels as well as the percentage of patients on lipid lowering agents between the groups. White blood cell counts, daily doses of Neoral and weight gain were significantly lower in the steroid-free group vs. the comparator group. However, more patients in the steroid-free group required erythropoietin and iron therapy for anemia (p < 0.001). We conclude that excellent graft survival with a significantly lower incidence of acute rejection can be achieved using a steroid-free maintenance immunosuppressive protocol consisting of Neoral and Sirolimus.     

Preventive OKT3 treatment with cyclosporine (Sandimmun) for second kidney transplantation

Abstract A total of 793 kidney transplantations (KTx) were performed from November 1073 to March 1993. Two hundred and forty-two patients were treated with conventional immunosuppression (azathioprine + prednisolone) and all the others with cyclosporine (Sandimmun) and prednisolone (SIM + PRED). The survival of the second graft was less good in both therapeutic groups than that of the first ones, so we have started to use preventive immunotherapy with OKT3 (CILAG) in combination with SIM (both before operation) and PRED. We compared 32 SIM-PRED patients with 20 OKT3 + SIM + PRED patients. All underwent a second KTx. The two groups were found to be comparable and homogeneous with regard to 14 of 18 parameters analysed statistically. Statistically significant differences were found between the two groups as regards the frequency of acute rejection within 30 days (46.69% vs 20%), the delta creatinine value on the 1st and 2nd postoperative days (- 4,3: -8 vs -8.6: -19.7%), patient survival after 4 years (78.2 vs 100%), and graft survival after 1 and 4 years (-58.9: -42.8 vs -83.5: -83.5%), with better results in the OKT3 group. We conclude that the preventive use of OKT3 simultaneously with SIM + PRED for the second KTx is the method of choice to prevent rejection and improve survival. This treatment results in patient and graft survival following the second KTx being as good as after the first KTx with SIM + PRED.     

Pharmacokinetics of a new microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin A (Neoral) in young patients after renal transplantation

Pharmacokinetics of the new galenic formulation of cyclosporin A, Neoral, (Sandoz) was examined in 12 stable young patients after renal transplantation. Six of these patients were tested before and 4 weeks after switching from the standard formulation Sandimmun to Neoral. No significant changes were observed in trough levels, t_max, C_max, and AUC_0–12h, but the absorption rate constant (K_a) increased (P=0.003). Glomerular filtration rate, as assessed by inulin clearance, increased by more than 10% in three patients and decreased in two, and was usually associated with a respective drop and rise in C_max and AUC_0–12h of cyclosporin A. The large interindividual variability in the response to the conversion to the new formulation points to a need for close monitoring of cyclosporin A trough levels and renal function after switching from Sandimmun to Neoral in this age group in order to avoid nephrotoxicity.     

The influence of various maintenance immunosuppressive drugs on lymphocele formation and treatment after kidney transplantation

PURPOSE: We compared the incidence of lymphocele formation and treatment in kidney transplant recipients given 3 immunosuppressive drug regimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive series of adult kidney only recipients, including group 1-152 who received sirolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/prednisone (P), group 2-168 who received cyclosporine/MMF/P and group 3-193 who received cyclosporine/azathioprine/P, were analyzed for post-transplantation lymphocele formation. All available records and imaging studies were reviewed, such as ultrasound, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging etc, for peritransplant fluid collections greater than 2.5 cm. Demographic characteristics and the risk factors for lymphocele were compared in these 513 recipients using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The overall incidence of lymphocele formation was 174 of 513 cases (33.9%) and the incidence of treated lymphoceles was 81 of 513 (15.7%). In groups 1 to 3 the incidence was 45.5%, 33.9% and 24.7%, respectively. These differences were significantly higher in group 1 vs groups 2 or 3 (p = 0.014) but they were not significantly different between groups 2 and 3. Similarly the incidence of treated lymphoceles was 23%, 12.5% and 12.9%, respectively. Findings were again statistically higher in group 1 vs groups 2 and 3 (p = 0.003) but not statistically significant between groups 2 and 3. A greater number of group 1 patients required surgical interventions compared with those in groups 2 and 3 (13.8% vs 4.7% and 4.8%, respectively, p = 0.019). In addition, acute rejection (p = 0.001) and body mass index greater than 32 (p = 0.02) were significant risk factors on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of sirolimus/MMF/P, obesity with a body mass index of greater than 30 kg/m and acute rejection are independent risk factors for lymphocele formation and treatment after kidney transplantation. Patients should be counseled and consideration should be given to prophylactic measures in this higher risk renal transplant population.     

Long-term results of living kidney transplantation from HLA-identical sibling donors under calcineurin inhibitor immunosuppression

BACKGROUND: Recently, it has been revealed that alloantigen-independent causes are important factors for late graft loss in kidney transplantation. We compared the results of living kidney transplantation from HLA-identical siblings with those from HLA-non-identical siblings to analyse the impact of alloantigen-independent factors on long-term graft survival. METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-six recipients who were grafted from their siblings between 1983 and 2002 were subdivided into those transplanted from HLA-identical donors (n=86) and those from HLA-non-identical donors (n=180). RESULTS: The incidence of acute rejection was significantly lower in the HLA-identical group than in the HLA-non-identical group (9.3% vs 53.9%, respectively; P<0.0001). Graft survival was significantly higher in the HLA-identical group than in the HLA-non-identical group (91.3% vs 79.2% at 5 years, 80.3% vs 66.8% at 10 years and 59.1% vs 51.7% at 15 years, respectively; P=0.0372). Although acute rejection was not seen as a cause of graft loss in the HLA-identical group, death with functioning graft, recurrence of the original disease or chronic allograft nephropathy were observed as the major causes of graft loss in the late period of the HLA-identical group. CONCLUSION: We concluded that alloantigen-independent causes constitute a crucial factor for graft loss in the late period of HLA-identical kidney transplantation.     

Obesity following kidney transplantation and steroid avoidance immunosuppression

Abstract:  Obesity is an important co-morbidity within end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and renal transplant populations. Previous studies have suggested that chronic corticosteroids result in increased body weight post-transplant. With the recent adoption of steroid-sparing immunosuppressive strategies, we evaluated the effect of these strategies on body mass index (BMI) after renal transplantation. We examined 95 renal transplant recipients enrolled in National Institutes of Health clinical transplant trials over the past three yr who received either lymphocyte depletion-based steroid sparing or traditional immunosuppressive therapy that included steroids for maintenance immunosuppression. Recipients were overweight prior to transplant and no significant differences existed in pre-transplant BMI among treatment groups. Regardless of therapy, BMI increased post-transplant in all recipients. The BMI increase consisted of an average weight gain of 5.01 ± 7.12 kg (mean, SD) post-transplant. Additionally, in a number of recipients placed on maintenance steroids, subsequent withdrawal at a mean of 100 d post-transplant had no impact on weight gain. Thus, body weight and BMI increase following kidney transplantation, even in the absence of steroids. Thus, patients gain weight after renal transplantation regardless of the treatment strategy. Steroid avoidance alone does not reduce risk factors associated with obesity in our patient population.     

Does the switch from Sandimmun to Sandimmun Neoral reduce patient need for Phenihydine?

Abstract In patients receiving cyclosporine A (CyA) - based immunosuppressive therapy, Ca²⁺ channel blockers (CCBs) prevent the development of CyA - related nephrotoxicity in which increased Ca²⁺ content plays an important role. We evaluated the dynamics of the intracellular (erythrocytes) and extracellular (plasma) Ca²⁺ levels and the influence of the CCB, Phenihydine, on this process during the conversion from Sandimmun (S) to Sandimmun Neoral (SN). Forty-two patients were enrolled. The conversion from S to SN normalized the elevated CA²⁺ level of erythrocytes in groups with Phenihydine ( n = 20) and without Phenyhidine ( n = 12) 4 weeks after the switch ( P < 0.05); this level remained stable until the end of study. Therefore we suggest that the switch from S to SN is effective in reducing elevated intracellular Ca²⁺ levels. The decrease of Ca²⁺ content in erythrocytes was similar in all groups switched to SN (with or without Phenihydine). The last effect should be an important argument to focus the further long-term investigations on the ability of CCBs to act as cytoprotective and nephroprotective agents during immunosuppressive protocols with the new microemulsion formulation of CyA.     

Decreased effect of immunosuppression on immunocompetence in African--Americans after kidney and liver transplantation

Several studies indicate that the poorer outcomes for African--Americans after transplantation may be due to decreased effectiveness of immunosuppressive agents. Using an in vitro test of immunocompetence (IMC), we measured the effects of immunosuppression on African-American, compared with Caucasian, kidney or liver transplantation recipients. The IMC result was the highest of three mixed lymphocyte culture responses using validated stimulator cell pools. A total of 293 tests were done in Caucasians and 144 in African--Americans. Overall, the IMC for African--Americans was 38, compared with 19 for Caucasians (p<0.01). This decreased effect of immunosuppression (higher IMC) was the same for liver as for kidney transplant recipients, occurred at the 2--3-yr interval, and was largely in patients of tacrolimus (FK506), with a strong but not significant trend in cyclosporine (CYA) recipients. The two groups were on the same nominal immunosuppression and FK506 and CYA levels were not different. We conclude that African-Americans retain more immune responsiveness on equivalent dose immunosuppression, notable particularly in years 2--3 after transplantation when earlier graft loss occurs in this group.     

Surgical complications after kidney transplantation: different impacts of immunosuppression,graft function,patient variables,and surgical performance

The population of kidney transplant (KTx) recipients often has complex medical and immunological conditions. Surgical complications (SCs) contribute to the increasing morbidity and costs in these patients. We analyzed the risk factors for SC in 405 KTx patients treated using defined immunosuppressive regimens according to their clinical and immunological risk profile: (1) standard immunosuppression (SIS) with IL‐2 receptor mAb, CNI, and (a) mycophenolic acid (MPA) or (b) mTOR inhibitor; and (2) more intense immunosuppression (IIS) with (a) ATG or (b) the additional use of plasma exchange and B‐ and T‐cell‐depleting agents. In a mixed effects logistic regression model, we identified the following risk factors for SC: male gender, diabetes, and post‐operative dialysis. No difference was found between the patients who received SIS with MPA and those who received mTOR inhibitors. The risk of suffering complications with IIS increases with age. In addition to IIS, diabetes was a risk for wound healing disorders. Therapeutic anticoagulation and a third or subsequent retransplantation increased the rate of bleeding. We did not identify immunosuppression or patient demographics as risk factors for lymphoceles or ureter complications; however, we demonstrated that the surgeon had a significant impact on severe complications, especially those of the ureter.     

The case for pancreas after kidney transplantation

Abstract:  Pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplantation has historically demonstrated inferior pancreas allograft survival compared to simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation. Under our current immunosuppression protocol, we have noted excellent outcomes and rare immunological graft loss. The goal of this study was to compare pancreas allograft survival in PAK and SPK recipients using this regimen. This was a single center retrospective review of all SPK and PAK transplants performed between January 2003 and November 2007. All transplants were performed with systemic venous drainage and enteric exocrine drainage. Immunosuppression included induction with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (thymoglobulin), early steroid withdrawal, and maintenance with tacrolimus and sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil. Study end points included graft and patient survival and immunosuppression related complications. Transplants included PAK 61 (30%) and SPK 142 (70%). One-yr patient survival was PAK 98% and SPK 95% (p = 0.44) and pancreas graft survival was PAK 95% and SPK 90% (p = 0.28). Acute cellular rejection was uncommon with 2% requiring treatment in each group. Survival for PAK using thymoglobulin induction, early steroid withdrawal and tacrolimus-based immunosuppression is at least comparable to SPK and should be pursued in the recipient with a potential living donor.     

Reductions in immunosuppression after haematological or solid organ cancer diagnosis in kidney transplant recipients

Few data exist on how immunosuppression is altered in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) following a diagnosis of cancer. This study investigated how immunosuppression was altered in KTR after cancer diagnosis and its effect on patient and graft survival. All KTR diagnosed with cancer at our centre from 1990 to 2012 were assessed. Drug regime and serum creatinine levels were recorded 1 year before, at time of, and 1 year after cancer diagnosis. Of 87 KTR who developed cancer (7.3% of transplanted population, n = 1189), 30 developed haematological malignancies and 57 developed solid organ cancers (SOC). In total, 38% of KTR presented with nodal or metastatic disease and 23 of 87 (26%) KTR died within 6 months of cancer diagnosis. Fifty‐five KTR had records of pre‐ and postcancer diagnosis drug regimes. Thirty‐six KTR had a (>50%) dose reduction or cessation of 1 or more immunosuppressive agents, and 19 no reduction in immunosuppression. In total, 2 of 36 (6%) of KTR who underwent a dose reduction suffered acute rejection that was reversed with methylprednisolone. Dose reduction/cessation of immunosuppression did not impair graft function, but also did not affect cancer free survival. Further larger prospective studies are needed to determine whether dose reduction alters relapse free cancer survival in KTR.     

No clinical benefit of rapid versus gradual tapering of immunosuppression to treat sustained BK virus viremia after kidney transplantation: a single‐center experience

Immunosuppressive drug tapering is currently the recommended treatment of BK virus (BKV) viremia after kidney transplantation; however, its exact modalities remain unclear. We retrospectively compared two consecutive strategies in 111 patients with sustained viremia: a gradual monitoring/tapering group (GT, n = 57) before 2012 and a rapid monitoring/tapering group (RT, n = 54) after 2012. At viremia diagnosis, the dose of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and tacrolimus levels (T₀) were similar among patient groups. However, following onset, the dose of MPA at 1 month (P = 0.002) and 3 months (P = 0.005) and Tac T₀ at 1 month (P = 0.030) and 3 months (P = 0.006) were lower in the RT group. This rapid minimization shortened BKV viremia (P < 0.001) and resulted in a better protection of graft function in patients with confirmed BKV‐associated nephropathy (P = 0.033) without impacting 5‐year graft survival. Survival without rejection was similar (P = 0.571), but the RT group had increased the development of de novo donor‐specific antibodies (dnDSAs; P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis identified basiliximab versus Thymoglobulin^® induction [hazard ratio (HR), 3.090; P = 0.001] and the RT strategy (HR, 6.021; P = 0.002) as independently associated with dnDSAs. Compared to a gradual tapering, rapid immunosuppression tapering to treat sustained BKV viremia does not improve medium‐term clinical outcome but increases the risk of developing dnDSAs.     

Renal allograft immunosuppression

Serum lipid and lipoprotein profiles were performed in order to investigate lipid abnormalities 2 years post-transplantation in first cadaveric renal allograft recipients immunosuppressed with cyclosporin (CyA), azathioprine (Aza), and methylprednisolone (MP), or with any combination of two drugs. CyA was used in low doses. Total serum cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, HDL2 cholesterol, HDL3 cholesterol, apolipoprotein A1, and apolipoprotein B were determined in 88 prospectively randomized patients with functioning grafts. When considering only the patients who remained on the original randomized treatment, there were no significant differences between the four groups in any of the measured variables. Mean total cholesterol was highest in the group receiving Aza and MP (6.8 mmol/l) and lowest in the group receiving triple therapy (5.8 mmol/l; NS). Mean triglyceride level was highest in the group receiving Aza and MP (2.3 mmol/l) versus 1.8–2.2 mmol/l in the groups receiving triple therapy, Aza+CyA, and CyA+MP. For all patients mean triglyceride level was highest in the group receiving Aza and MP (2.7 mmol/l) and lowest in the group receiving triple therapy (1.7 mmol/l; P<0.05). Mean HDL cholesterol ranged from 1.5 to 1.6 mmol/l in all groups. Neither CyA concentration nor CyA or MP dose correlated with cholesterol or triglyceride concentration. However, the average MP dose was twice as high in the group receiving Aza and MP as in the other two groups employing steroids. Serum cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations were related to body mass index (r=0.28, P=0.045 and r=0.30, P=0.029, respectively). Hyperlipidemia was most common in the group receiving Aza and MP. The frequency of hypercholesterolemia (serum cholesterol level >6.5 mmol/l) was 18%, 45%, 60%, and 35% for the patients continuing with the originally randomized treatment in the groups receiving triple therapy, Aza+CyA, Aza+MP, and CyA+MP, respectively. In a normal Finnish reference population, 35% of all males and 31% of all females have a serum cholesterollevel above 6.5 mmol/l. Thus, only patients receiving Aza and MP had a clearly higher frequency of hypercholesterolemia than that found in a normal population. Taken together, this study shows no lipid abnormalities associated with the use of low-dose CyA for 2 years after transplantation. Hyperlipidemia occurring after transplantation is probably multifactorial and more associated with other risk factors than with the immunosuppressive therapy.     

肾移植前免疫诱导治疗的进展

为晚期肾病患者实施肾移植手术已成为尿毒症患者的最佳治疗方案,可手术后的排异反应始终困扰着医生和患者。术后使用免疫抑制剂是肾移植的常规治疗方案,但人们发现围手术期使用免疫抑制剂进行免疫诱导可降低排异反应的发生,减少术后免疫抑制剂的使用剂量,正逐步成为肾移植免疫学的研究热点。本文为此作一综述。     

New directions for induction immunosuppression strategy in solid organ transplantation

Background

Solid organ transplant centers are increasingly using induction immunosuppression strategies. Induction immunosuppression involves the use of intense therapy at the time of transplantation with the goal of preventing acute rejection and ultimately inducing a tolerogenic state. The objective of this review is to examine specialized induction agents currently in clinical use and highlight novel therapeutics on the horizon for induction immunosuppression.

Methods

A literature search using the PubMed and MEDLINE databases identified salient basic science and clinical research articles on induction immunosuppression for solid organ transplantation.

Conclusions

While current induction immunosuppression agents have reduced the incidence of acute rejection, the goal of transplant tolerance has not been realized. Furthermore, the long-term allograft survival rate is not clearly influenced by the practice of induction immunosuppression. New approaches to tolerance induction, such as costimulatory-based therapy, mixed chimerism, and adoptive cellular transfer, hold promise for more effective induction immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation.     

Renal allograft immunosuppression: IV. Comparison of Iipid and lipoprotein profiles in blood using double and triple immunosuppressive drug combinations

Abstract. Serum lipid and lipoprotein profiles were performed in order to investigate lipid abnormalities 2 years post-transplantation in first cadaveric renal allograft recipients immunosuppressed with cyclosporin (CyA), azathioprine (Aza), and methylprednisolone (MP), or with any combination of two drugs. CyA was used in low doses. Total serum cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, HDL2 cholesterol, HDL3 cholesterol, apolipoprotein A1, and apolipoprotein B were determined in 88 prospectively randomized patients with functioning grafts. When considering only the patients who remained on the original randomized treatment, there were no significant differences between the four groups in any of the measured variables. Mean total cholesterol was highest in the group receiving Aza and MP (6.8 mmol/l) and lowest in the group receiving triple therapy (5.8 mmol/l; NS). Mean triglyceride level was highest in the group receiving Aza and MP (2.3 mmol/1) versus 1.8–2.2 mmol/l in the groups receiving triple therapy, Aza + CyA, and CyA + MP. For all patients mean triglyceride level was highest in the group receiving Aza and MP (2.7 mmol/1) and lowest in the group receiving triple therapy (1.7 mmol/l; P<0.05). Mean HDL cholesterol ranged from 1.5 to 1.6 mmol/l in all groups. Neither CyA concentration nor CyA or MP dose correlated with cholesterol or triglyceride concentration. However, the average MP dose was twice as high in the group receiving Aza and MP as in the other two groups employing steroids. Serum cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations were related to body mass index (r= 0.28, P= 0.045 and r= 0.30, P= 0.029, respectively). Hyperlipidemia was most common in the group receiving Aza and MP, The frequency of hypercholesterolemia (serum cholesterol level > 6.5 mmol/1) was 18%, 45%, 60%, and 35% for the patients continuing with the originally randomized treatment in the groups receiving triple therapy, Aza + CyA, Aza + MP, and CyA + MP, respectively. In a normal Finnish reference population, 35% of all males and 31% of allfemaleshaveaserumcholesterollevel above 6.5 mmol/l. Thus, only patients receiving Aza and MP had a clearly higher frequency of hypercholesterolemia than that found in a normal population. Taken together, this study shows no lipid abnormalities associated with the use of low-dose CyA for 2 years after transplantation. Hyperlipidemia occurring after transplantation is probably multifactorial and more associated with other risk factors than with the immunosuppressive therapy.