Awareness and general anaesthesia

A state exists after the induction of anaesthesia in which patients may be aware of their surroundings yet unable to communicate. This problem of awareness and recall during general anaesthesia is a recent one in the relatively short history of anaesthesia. Prior to the introduction of muscle relaxants in 1942 by Griffith and Johnson, it was felt that "light anaesthesia" would be signified by violent movements. Today, the concepts of anaesthetic depth, awareness, and recall have become more complicated with the addition of numerous newer, shorter-acting, intravenous anaesthetic agents with varying effects on the conscious state. Several methods have been described to detect awareness. None has yet been found to be totally reliable and numerous reports of awareness can be found in the literature. Light inhalation and total intravenous anaesthesia have been blamed for the majority of these case reports. However, awareness during total intravenous anaesthesia is avoidable with the proper use of a combination of a hypnotic and an analgesic such as midazolam and alfentanil for general anaesthesia.     

Awareness: a problem in paediatric anaesthesia?

Intraoperative awareness has been reported to occur in 0.8-5.0% of paediatric patients undergoing anaesthesia and, therefore, seems to be more common than in adults (incidence 0.1-0.2%). In adult patients, the consequences of intraoperative awareness are well known and can be severe, in children, however, they have not yet been adequately studied. The causes for intraoperative awareness can be divided into three broad categories: First, no or only a light anaesthetic is given on purpose, second, an insufficient dose of an anaesthetic is given inadvertently, third, there is equipment malfunction or the anaesthesiologist makes an error. Unfortunately, especially in young children, painful interventions are still performed without adequate analgesia, e.g. awake intubation or fracture manipulation under midazolam sedation alone. The key issue is, however, that pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics change enormously from the 500 g preterm baby to the adolescent patient. Adequate dosing is much more difficult in paediatric patients compared to standard adult surgical patients. Solid knowledge of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of commonly used drugs in different paediatric age groups, as well as aiming for perfection in daily care will help to reduce the incidence of awareness. Methods for monitoring the depth of hypnosis, e.g. the bispectral index, will be used increasingly, at least in children above 1 year of age. In addition to clinical parameters, they will hopefully help to further reduce the incidence of intraoperative awareness.     

Prevention of awareness during anaesthesia

Inadequate anaesthesia may lead to awareness. A properly trained anaesthetist, administering anaesthesia according to their knowledge of pharmacology and patient and surgical characteristics, assisted by clinical signs and monitoring, can minimize this risk. Relying upon volatile-based anaesthesia delivered at a concentration of at least 0.5 MAC may be effective, but this precludes the use of total intravenous anaesthesia techniques and in any case may lead to unwanted hypotension. Equipment failure may occur. Benzodiazepines do not protect the patient from awareness. The development of electroencephalographic monitors of anaesthetic depth provides an opportunity to prevent awareness. Two large scale studies, one of which was a randomized trial, have identified a 5-fold reduction in risk of awareness when depth of anaesthesia using bispectral index monitoring was used. The incidence of awareness can be further reduced with currently available techniques used more widely.     

Unerwünschte Wachheit

Intraoperative awareness has been reported to occur in 0.8–5.0% of paediatric patients undergoing anaesthesia and, therefore, seems to be more common than in adults (incidence 0.1–0.2%). In adult patients, the consequences of intraoperative awareness are well known and can be severe, in children, however, they have not yet been adequately studied. The causes for intraoperative awareness can be divided into three broad categories: First, no or only a light anaesthetic is given on purpose, second, an insufficient dose of an anaesthetic is given inadvertently, third, there is equipment malfunction or the anaesthesiologist makes an error. Unfortunately, especially in young children, painful interventions are still performed without adequate analgesia, e.g. awake intubation or fracture manipulation under midazolam sedation alone. The key issue is, however, that pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics change enormously from the 500 g preterm baby to the adolescent patient. Adequate dosing is much more difficult in paediatric patients compared to standard adult surgical patients. Solid knowledge of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of commonly used drugs in different paediatric age groups, as well as aiming for perfection in daily care will help to reduce the incidence of awareness. Methods for monitoring the depth of hypnosis, e.g. the bispectral index, will be used increasingly, at least in children above 1 year of age. In addition to clinical parameters, they will hopefully help to further reduce the incidence of intraoperative awareness.     

Wachzustände während Allgemeinanästhesie Definition,Häufigkeit,klinische Relevanz,Ursachen, Vermeidung und medikolegale Aspekte

The possibility that a patient during general anaesthesia is aware of the operation going on and aware of severe pain that might be remembered postoperatively must be very alarming to patients and anaesthetists alike. Furthermore, there is experimental evidence showing that conscious recall of intraoperative events is only the tip of an iceberg; it seems very probable that there is even a higher incidence of unconscious perception during general anaesthesia. Therefore, the following stages of intraoperative awareness must be distinguished: (1) conscious awareness with explicit recall and with severe pain; (2) conscious awareness with explicit recall but no complaints of pain; (3) conscious awareness without explicit recall and possible implicit recall; (4) subconscious awareness without explicit recall and possible implicit recall; (5) no awareness. The incidence of conscious awareness with explicit recall and severe pain has been estimated at less frequent than 1/3000 general anaesthetics. Conscious awareness with explicit recall but no complaints of pain has been reported in the literature with an incidence of 0.5–2%. With 7–72%, conscious awareness without explicit recall and possible implicit recall shows a very wide range of variation and its occurrence probably depends on the anaesthetic drugs used. Subconscious awareness with possible implicit recall has an incidence of up to 80%, but there are many methodological problems in demonstrating implicit memory of intraoperative events. Reports of intraoperative awareness do not come exclusively from cardiac surgery and obstetrics, but also from all other operative specialities. Postoperatively, patients who experienced intraoperative awareness may develop a so-called post-traumatic stress syndrome. Symptoms involve re-experiencing the event awake or in dreams, sleep disturbances, depression, avoidance of stimuli associated with the event. The probability of the development of the post-traumatic stress syndrome seems to coincide with the experience of severe pain. When a patient complains of intraoperative awareness postoperatively the anaesthesiologist should discuss the event frankly with the patient. When the symptoms of the post-traumatic stress syndrome persist a psychotherapy should follow. Causes for intraoperative awareness may be: equipment failure, too-light anaesthesia, e.g. for a caesarean section or for emergency surgery in severely injured or polytraumatized patients, during cardiac surgery, bronchoscopy or difficult intubation. There is interindividual variability in anaesthetic effect; for example, chronic drug or alcohol abuse or overweight may make increased anaesthetic doses necessary. They are at risk for intraoperative awareness. Some general anaesthetics or anaesthetic procedures, e.g. the combination of a relaxant and N₂O, opioid mono-anaesthetics, or opioids combined with benzodiazepines, seem to involve a higher risk of intraoperative awareness than do volatile anaesthetics. The bases of litigation are medical malpractice, breach of contract by the anaesthesiologist or lack of informed consent from the patient. Therefore, patients who are at risk of intraoperative awareness should be given detailed information on this special risk before the operation.     

Awareness during general anaesthesia: a review of 81 cases from the Anaesthetic Incident Monitoring Study

Because of recent studies suggesting that awareness is still a major issue in anaesthetic practice, we reviewed 8372 incidents reported to the Anaesthetic Incident Monitoring Study. There were 81 cases in which peri-operative recall was consistent with awareness. There were 50 cases of definite awareness and 31 cases with a high probability of awareness. In 13 of the 81 incidents, the patients appeared to receive adequate doses of anaesthetic drugs. Where the cause could be determined, awareness was mainly due to drug error resulting in inadvertent paralysis of an awake patient (n = 32) and failure of delivery of volatile anaesthetic (n = 16). Less common causes included prolonged attempts at intubation of the trachea (n = 5), deliberate withdrawal of volatile anaesthetic (n = 4) or muscle relaxant apnoea with inadequate administration of hypnotic (n = 3). An objective central nervous system depth of anaesthesia monitor may have prevented 42 of these incidents and an improved drug administration system may have prevented 32. On the basis of these reports, we have developed guidelines that may have prevented the majority of these incidents.     

The 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: summary of main findings and risk factors

We present the main findings of the 5th National Audit Project on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia. Incidences were estimated using reports of accidental awareness as the numerator, and a parallel national anaesthetic activity survey to provide denominator data. The incidence of certain/probable and possible accidental awareness cases was ~1:19 600 anaesthetics (95% CI 1:16 700–23 450). However, there was considerable variation across subtypes of techniques or subspecialties. The incidence with neuromuscular blockade was ~1:8200 (1:7030–9700), and without it was ~1:135 900 (1:78 600–299 000). The cases of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia reported to 5th National Audit Project were overwhelmingly cases of unintended awareness during neuromuscular blockade. The incidence of accidental awareness during caesarean section was ~1:670 (1:380–1300). Two thirds (82, 66%) of cases of accidental awareness experiences arose in the dynamic phases of anaesthesia, namely induction of and emergence from anaesthesia. During induction of anaesthesia, contributory factors included: use of thiopental; rapid sequence induction; obesity; difficult airway management; neuromuscular blockade; and interruptions of anaesthetic delivery during movement from anaesthetic room to theatre. During emergence from anaesthesia, residual paralysis was perceived by patients as accidental awareness, and commonly related to a failure to ensure full return of motor capacity. One third (43, 33%) of accidental awareness events arose during the maintenance phase of anaesthesia, most due to problems at induction or towards the end of anaesthesia. Factors increasing the risk of accidental awareness included: female sex; age (younger adults, but not children); obesity; anaesthetist seniority (junior trainees); previous awareness; out‐of‐hours operating; emergencies; type of surgery (obstetric, cardiac, thoracic); and use of neuromuscular blockade. The following factors were not risk factors for accidental awareness: ASA physical status; race; and use or omission of nitrous oxide. We recommend that an anaesthetic checklist, to be an integral part of the World Health Organization Safer Surgery checklist, is introduced as an aid to preventing accidental awareness. This paper is a shortened version describing the main findings from 5th National Audit Project – the full report can be found at http://www.nationalauditprojects.org.uk/NAP5_home#pt .     

Balancing paediatric anaesthesia: preclinical insights into analgesia, hypnosis, neuroprotection, and neurotoxicity

Logistical and ethical reasons make conducting clinical research in paediatric practice difficult, and therefore safe and efficacious advances are dependent on good preclinical research. For example, notable advances have been made in preclinical studies of pain processing that correlate well with patient data. Other areas of paediatric anaesthetic research remain in their infancy including mechanisms of anaesthesia and anaesthetic neuroprotection and neurotoxicity. Animal data have identified the potential 'double-edged' sword of administering anaesthetic agents in the young; although these agents can be neuroprotective in certain circumstances, they can be neurotoxic in others. The potential for this toxicity must be balanced against the importance of providing adequate anaesthesia for which there can be no compromise. We review the current state of preclinical research in paediatric anaesthesia and identify areas which require further exploration in order to provide the foundations for well-conducted clinical trials.     

Checking anaesthetic equipment 2012: association of anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland

A pre-use check to ensure the correct functioning of anaesthetic equipment is essential to patient safety. The anaesthetist has a primary responsibility to understand the function of the anaesthetic equipment and to check it before use. Anaesthetists must not use equipment unless they have been trained to use it and are competent to do so. A self-inflating bag must be immediately available in any location where anaesthesia may be given. A two-bag test should be performed after the breathing system, vaporisers and ventilator have been checked individually. A record should be kept with the anaesthetic machine that these checks have been done. The 'first user' check after servicing is especially important and must be recorded.     

Continuous spinal anaesthesia for abdominal surgery in a patient receiving amiodarone

The perioperative management of a 57-yr-old patient receiving chronic amiodarone therapy with a continuous spinal anaesthetic for a low anterior resection of the colon is discussed. The most appropriate anaesthetic technique for patients receiving chronic amiodarone therapy remains controversial, but the avoidance of general anaesthesia may be beneficial because of the risk of postoperative pulmonary failure. In this patient continuous spinal anaesthesia was slowly titrated to the desired level, coincident haemodynamic alterations were easily treated as they developed, and high serum local anaesthetic concentrations which occur with other regional anaesthetic techniques were avoided.     

Analyse des échecs de la rachianesthésie en fonction de l''évolution de la pratique d''un hôpital universitaire

This study is a retrospective analysis of 303 consecutive spinal anaesthesia performed in orthopaedic patients of a University Hospital between January and December 1990. Failure of spinal anaesthesia was defined as the requirement for general anaesthesia to perform surgery. The parameters studied as possible risk factors of failure were patients demographics, local anaesthetic agents and solutions and techniques of spinal anaesthesia (single injection versus continuous spinal anaesthesia). Failures were related to inadequate or incomplete extension of sensory blockade or to difficulties to perform spinal injection. Continuous spinal anaesthesia was performed in 209 patients mostly with 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine, while 94 patients received a single injection of either hyperbaric 0.5% tetracaine with adrenaline or 0.5% bupivacaine or 5% lidocaine. Failures occurred in 6.3% of the cases but were significantly less frequent with continuous spinal anaesthesia (4.8%) than with the conventional technique (9.6%). The incidence of failure was higher with hyperbaric tetracaine (11.1%) confirming its poor reliability. Inadequate extension of the anaesthetic block was the main cause of failure whatever the spinal anaesthetic technique. These results point out the reliability of continuous spinal anaesthesia but problems may occasionally occur due to spinal catheter misplacement.     

Experimental and Preliminary Clinical Studies of a Method of Reducing Anaesthetic Gas Contamination

Long-term exposure to low concentrations of anaesthetic gases is potentially hazardous. In spite of efforts to reduce the exposure of personnel by increased air conditioning, by scavenging of excess circuit gases and by improvements in anaesthetic equipment, high concentrations of gases have still been measured. Problems arise during mask induction, in paediatric anaesthesia, and in certain situations with unavoidable leaks, especially in small rooms but also in recovery rooms. Experimental and preliminary clinical studies have shown that nitrous oxide pollution can be considerably reduced by using a separate close scavenging system in the area where high gas concentrations occur. The geometrical and flow dimensions of a close scavenging device used in paediatric. anaesthesia are described.     

Anesthesia in myotonia

Myotonia is defined as a persistent contraction of skeletal muscles after their stimulation. This contracture is not prevented or relieved by regional anaesthesia or muscle relaxants. The sensitivity to non-depolarizing muscle relaxants is usually normal. Suxamethonium, neostigmine, hypothermia, a rise in kalaemia should be avoided. There have been case reports of malignant hyperthermia in patients with myotonia congenita. Dystrophia myotonica is the second most frequent of the inherited muscle diseases, after Duchenne's dystrophy. The severity of the disease is due more to the muscular atrophy and the multiple organ involvement than to the abnormal contraction. Atrioventricular heart block and dysrhythmias are more common than heart failure. Prolonged apnoea and pneumonia are the main risks of anaesthesia. In severe cases, exists a restrictive respiratory insufficiency which is preceded by a fall in the maximum expiratory pressure. Dysphagias and inefficient coughing may occur early. An increased susceptibility to hypnotic drugs and opiates is a common feature. Spontaneous sleep apnoeas should be sought before anaesthesia, especially by using pulse oximetry. The anaesthetic implications are reemphasized.     

Critical incidents: the respiratory system

Critical incidents are events that cause harm or have the potential to cause harm if not recognized and acted upon. Respiratory complications can cause death or serious neurological disability when they occur. The incidence of these complications has decreased during the past few decades. A combination of improved training, availability of pulse oximetry and capnography, and emphasis on patient safety has brought about this improvement in outcome. A thorough preoperative assessment of the patient, planning a suitable anaesthetic technique, checking the availability and functioning of all necessary equipment, seeking appropriate help and advice, familiarity with the equipment to be used and vigilance in monitoring during anaesthesia are the key factors for the avoidance or early detection and management of respiratory complications during induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia. Unexpected respiratory complications that may occur include hypoxaemia, airway obstruction, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, pulmonary oedema and pneumothorax. A guide to the identification and management of these conditions is outlined in this article.     

Monitoring the brain: processed electroencephalogram and peri‐operative outcomes

Although the brain is the target organ of general anaesthesia, the utility of intra‐operative brain monitoring remains controversial. Ideally, the incorporation of brain monitoring into routine practice would promote the maintenance of an optimal depth of anaesthesia, with an ultimate goal of avoiding the negative outcomes that have been associated with inadequate or excessive anaesthesia. A variety of processed electroencephalogram devices exist, of which the bispectral index is the most widely used, particularly in the research setting. Whether such devices prove to be useful will depend not only on their ability to influence anaesthetic management but also on whether the changes they promote can actually affect clinically important outcomes. This review highlights the evidence for the role of bispectral index monitoring, in particular, in guiding anaesthetic management and influencing clinical outcomes, specifically intra‐operative awareness, measures of early recovery, mortality and neurocognitive outcomes.     

Laboratory animal anaesthesia: influence of anaesthetic protocols on experimental models

The use of experimental animals requires anaesthesia to provide immobility and analgesia. Animals require anaesthesia not only for ethical reasons but also because pain and stress can alter the quality of research results. Recognition of pain, and its treatment is important throughout the procedure. Before anaesthesia, animals are acclimated and rehydrated. Except in small rodents and in ruminants, in order to avoid vomiting, a fast of 8 to 12 hours before anaesthesia is recommended. In order to protect animals against suffering and distress during transfer, restraint and management, a premedication is administered. Most human anaesthetic products can be used in animals. There are some specific veterinary anaesthetics. Moreover, the anaesthetic effects could be different from specie to an other. In most big animals, induction is realized by intravenous administration. In small rodents, venous puncture and contention could be difficult, and anaesthetic agents may be injected via intraperitoneal or intramuscular way. The principal inconvenient of these administration routes is the impossibility to adjust dose to animal response. In large animals, human anaesthesia material can be used. Some technical adaptations could be necessary in smaller animals. In rodents or in neonatology, specific devices are recommended. ECG, arterial pressure, tidal volume, expired CO(2) and oxygen saturation monitoring assess quality of, and tolerance to anaesthesia. If animals are awaked after anaesthesia, postoperative management is closed to human clinical problems. During animal experimentations, anaesthesia may interact with results. All anaesthetic drugs alter normal physiology in some way and may confound physiologic results. In the literature, most publications do not mention this possible interaction. Investigators need to understand how animals are affected by anaesthetic drugs in order to formulate anaesthetic protocols with minimal effects on data. Extrapolation between different animal species and human and animals about the effects of anaesthetic agents are very hazardous. Great differences exist between the effects observed in vitro and in whole animals. The effects of the anaesthetics could be totally different if they are used alone or in association. The same anaesthetic could have opposite effects from an organ to another. For results validation, the anaesthesia side effects (hypoventilation, hypotension, cooling em leader ) have to be minimized. All new experimental models should require discussing the possible interferences between anaesthesia and results and to compare results obtained with different anaesthetic protocols.     

Critical incident reports concerning anaesthetic equipment: analysis of the UK National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) data from 2006-2008*

Anaesthetic equipment plays a central role in anaesthetic practice but brings the potential for malfunction or misuse. We aimed to explore the national picture by reviewing patient safety incidents relating to anaesthetic equipment from the National Reporting and Learning System for England and Wales between 2006 and 2008. We searched the database using the system's own classification and by scrutinising the free text of relevant incidents. There were 1029 relevant incidents. Of these, 410 (39.8%) concerned patient monitoring, most commonly screen failure during anaesthesia, failure of one modality or failure to transfer data automatically from anaesthetic room to operating theatre. Problems relating to ventilators made up 185 (17.9%) of the reports. Sudden failures during anaesthesia accounted for 142 (13.8%) of these, with a further 10 cases (0.9%) where malfunction caused a sustained or increasing positive pressure in the patient's airway. Leaks made up 99 (9.6%) of incidents and 53 (5.2%) of incidents arose from the use of infusion pumps. Most (89%) of the incidents caused no patient harm; only 30 (2.9%) were judged to have led to moderate or severe harm. Although equipment was often faulty, user error or unfamiliarity also played a part. A large variety of causes led to a relatively small number of clinical scenarios, that anaesthetists should be ready, both individually and organisationally, to manage even when the cause is not apparent. We make recommendations for enhancing patient safety with respect to equipment. You can respond to this article at http://www.anaesthesiacorrespondence.com.     

The use of processed electroencephalography (pEEG) in obstetric anaesthesia: a narrative review

Accidental awareness under general anaesthesia (AAGA) remains a major complication of anaesthesia. The incidence of AAGA during obstetric anaesthesia is high relative to other specialities. The use of processed electroencephalography (pEEG) in the form of “depth of anaesthesia” monitoring has been shown to reduce the incidence of AAGA in the non-obstetric population.The evidence for using pEEG to prevent AAGA in the obstetric population is poor and requires further exploration. Furthermore, pregnancy and disease states affecting the central nervous system, such as pre-eclampsia, may alter the interpretation of pEEG waveforms although this has not been fully characterised.National guidelines exist for pEEG monitoring with total intravenous anaesthesia and for “high-risk” cases regardless of technique, including the obstetric population. However, none of the currently available guidelines relates specifically to obstetric anaesthesia.Using pEEG monitoring for obstetric anaesthesia may also provide additional benefits beyond a reduction in risk of AAGA. These potential benefits include reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting, reduced anaesthetic agent use, and a shorter post-anaesthetic recovery stay. In addition, pEEG acts as a surrogate marker of cerebral perfusion, and thus as an additional monitor for impending cardiovascular collapse, as seen in amniotic fluid embolism.The subtle physiological and pathological changes in EEG activity that may occur during pregnancy are an unexplored research area in the context of anaesthetic pEEG monitors. We believe that the direction of clinical practice is moving towards greater use of pEEG monitoring and individualisation of anaesthesia.     

Recall of awareness during cardiac anaesthesia: influence of feedback information to the anaesthesiologist

We interviewed 303 cardiac surgery patients to evaluate the incidence of intraoperative awareness with recall.
First, we randomly interviewed 99 patients, of whom four patients (4%) reported awareness and recall. We informed the cardiac anaesthesiologists of the results of these interviews, and we also gave general information regarding means to reduce awareness and recall during general anaesthesia. Thereafter, we interviewed 204 consecutive cardiac surgery patients. Now, three of the patients (1.5%) had intraoperative awareness with recall. The reduction in the incidence from 4% to 1.5% was not significant. However, the doses of principal anaesthetic drugs had increased significantly between the two interview phases, while the dose of pancuronium, the main muscle relaxant used, had decreased significantly. Also, there was a significant increase in the number of anaesthesias where anaesthetic agents had been administered continuously instead of bolus or non-continuous dosing techniques. Between the patients with awareness and recall and those without it, there was no difference in the doses of anaesthetic agents given. The patients with awareness were significantly younger than those not aware.
In conclusion, with educational measures and vigilance over the problem, the incidence of intraoperative awareness during cardiac anaesthesia may be reduced. The incidence figure of 1.5% we observed is of the magnitude reported recently by others with modern cardiac anaesthesia techniques.     

Ankylosing spondylitis and neuraxial anaesthesia — A 10 year review

Purpose

Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) patients present specific challenges to the anaesthetist. Both airway management and neuraxial access may prove to he difficult. The trend has been to deal with the airway challenge, and avoid neuraxial anaesthesia. In many cases this may lead to unnecessarily denying the patient neuraxial anaesthesia (NA). We retrospectively-reviewed the operative anaesthetic management of 51 consecutive AS patients who underwent 82 perineal or lower limb procedures and concurrent anaesthetic management at the Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Center from 1984 through 1994 (inclusive).

Source

Anaesthetic records were used to document the type of anaesthetic used, i.e., general or regional, and the degree of difficulty experienced with each.

Principal findings

Of the 82 procedures performed on AS patients 16 (19.5%) were planned as NA. General anaesthesia (GA) was planned for 65 (79.3%) of the procedures. One procedure involved monitored anaesthetic care (MAC). Neuraxial access consisted of 13 spinal and three epidural attempts. Spinal anaesthesia was possible in 10 (76.2%) of cases and failed in 3 (23.8%). Epidural anaesthesia was unsuccessful in each attempt. There was no difference in demographics or duration of disease between the successes and failures. Conclusions: These data suggest that spinal anaesthesia can be used as an alternative to general anaesthesia in AS patients undergoing perineal or lower limb surgery. There were no factors identified in this review that were predictive of success or failure in gaining neuraxial access.