Differences in responsiveness to hyperventilation and methacholine in asthma and chronic bronchitis.

In a previous study on 27 patients with chronic bronchitis we found that only three developed bronchoconstriction in response to hyperventilation of cold, dry air despite an increased responsiveness to methacholine inhalation. We therefore investigated bronchial responsiveness to hyperventilation with cold, dry air and methacholine in 27 patients with stable asthma who had a similar range of baseline FEV1 values but who developed bronchoconstriction that could be reversed to give an FEV1 more than 70% of the predicted value. Baseline FEV1 was 0.88-3.98 l (37-114% predicted). All but one subject developed bronchoconstriction in response to hyperventilation. There was a linear relationship between baseline FEV1 and response to methacholine (r2 = 0.37, p less than 0.001) and the relationship was significantly different from that found in the bronchitic subjects (F2.50 = 24.94, p less than 0.001). In general, the response to methacholine was greater in the asthmatic than in the bronchitic subjects for any baseline FEV1. The results suggest that there are different mechanisms underlying the increased responsiveness to methacholine in asthma and chronic bronchitis.     

Comparison of airway reactivity induced by histamine, methacholine, and isocapnic hyperventilation in normal and asthmatic subjects

In an investigation of a rapid screening test for airway reactivity using isocapnic hyperventilation with room air and cold air the results of this test were compared with the airway response to histamine and methacholine challenge. Twelve non-atopic, non-smoking normal subjects and 11 subjects with stable asthma who had an FEV1 above 74% of the predicted value were studied. In the normal subjects isocapnic hyperventilation with room air (75 l/min; 22 degrees C (SEM 0.2 degrees); 10 mg H2O/l air) and isocapnic hyperventilation with cold air (77 l/min; -10 degrees C (0.9 degrees); 2.4 mg H2O/l air) produced no significant change in FEV1. In the asthmatic subjects, hyperventilation with room air (71 l/min; 22 degrees C (0.8 degrees); 10 mg H2O/l air) caused a mean fall in FEV1 of 11.7%; cold air hyperventilation (70 l/min; -10 degrees C (0.9 degrees); 2.4 mg H2O/l air) caused a mean fall in FEV1 of 20.4%. Cold air hyperventilation produced greater separation between normal and asthmatic subjects than room air. The provocative concentration of histamine required to reduce the FEV1 by 20% (PC20) correlated closely with the PC20 for methacholine (r = 0.95; p less than 0.001). Both tests separated normal from asthmatic subjects. PC20 for both histamine and methacholine correlated with the fall in FEV1 after cold air hyperventilation (r = 0.93, p less than 0.001; r = 0.87, p less than 0.001 respectively). We conclude that the results of a rapid screening test based on hyperventilation with cold air correlate well with a standard pharmacological challenge.     

Bronchial responsiveness, lung mechanics, gas transfer, and corticosteroid response in patients with chronic airflow obstruction.

Thirty patients with stable chronic airflow obstruction receiving regular bronchodilator treatment were studied to determine whether the level of bronchial responsiveness, transfer factor for carbon monoxide (TLCO), or the mechanical properties of the lung predicted a bronchodilator response to oral corticosteroid treatment. Before treatment mean (SD) FEV1 was 48% (16%) of the predicted value (% pred); the geometric mean concentration of methacholine required to produce a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) was 0.44 (range 0.07-3.32) mg/ml; and TLCO was 59% (21%) predicted. The exponential constant (k) defining the shape of the static volume-pressure curve was 146% (66%) predicted and pulmonary conductance relative to predicted lung volume at a transpulmonary pressure of 5 cm H2O (sGL5) was 72% (37%) predicted. After prednisolone treatment (0.6 mg kg-1 day-1 for two weeks) FEV1 increased by 8% (19%) (p less than 0.05) and daily mean peak flow (PEF) by 3% (10%) (p less than 0.01) over pretreatment values. Three patients had an increase in FEV1 of more than 30%, two of whom had sputum eosinophilia (p less than 0.05). The three were among the 13 patients with a reduced sGL5. The increase in FEV1 did not correlate with initial PC20 (r = 0.16), k (r = -0.12), or TLCO (r = -0.14). Thus measurements of bronchial responsiveness, lung distensibility, and TLCO did not predict corticosteroid response in patients with stable chronic airflow obstruction. Patients with sputum eosinophilia or reduced pulmonary conductance may be more likely to respond.     

Bronchial responsiveness and acute bronchodilator response in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and diffuse panbronchiolitis.

BACKGROUND--Diffuse panbronchiolitis (DPB) is characterised clinically by chronic airflow limitation and respiratory tract infection, and pathologically by chronic bronchiolar inflammation. To elucidate the functional differences between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and DPB the bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was compared in 64 patients with COPD and 32 patients with DPB, and the bronchodilator response was compared in 72 patients with COPD and 49 with DPB. METHODS--Bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was determined by the dosimeter method and expressed as PD20FEV1, and bronchodilator response was measured as the change in percentage predicted response with 5 mg nebulised salbutamol. RESULTS--Baseline FEV1 was similar in the two groups of patients. Patients with COPD were more responsive to methacholine than were those with DPB (geometric mean PD20FEV1 8.87 v 48.0 cumulative units). Reversibility of air flow obstruction, expressed as the difference between the percentage predicted postbronchodilator FEV1 and prebronchodilator FEV1, was significantly larger in patients with COPD than in those with DPB (7.87 (6.52)% v 4.16 (4.43)%). CONCLUSIONS--The observation that patients with DPB differ substantially in bronchial responsiveness from those with COPD is thought to reflect the difference in the mechanisms of these two diseases--that is, airway disease in DPB and more parenchymal disease in the group of patients with COPD. The nature of bronchiolar inflammation in COPD and DPB is also different, possibly explaining the difference in bronchial responsiveness. More fixed airflow limitation as a result of structural bronchiolar lesions in DPB will explain the smaller reversibility of airflow obstruction.     

Citric acid cough threshold and airway responsiveness in asthmatic patients and smokers with chronic airflow obstruction.

The relation between citric acid cough threshold and airway hyperresponsiveness was investigated in 11 non-smoking patients with allergic asthma (mean FEV1 94% predicted) and 25 non-atopic smokers with chronic airflow obstruction (mean FEV1 65% predicted). Cough threshold was determined on two occasions by administering doubling concentrations of citric acid. Seven of the 11 asthmatic subjects and 14 of 25 smokers with chronic airflow obstruction had a positive cough threshold on both test days. Cough threshold measurements were reproducible in both groups (standard deviation of duplicate measurements 1.2 doubling concentrations in asthma, 1.1 doubling concentrations in chronic airflow obstruction). Citric acid provocation did not cause bronchial obstruction in most patients, though four patients had a fall in FEV1 of more than 20% for a short time on one occasion only. No significant difference in cough threshold was found between the two patient groups despite differences in baseline FEV1 values. There was no significant correlation between cough threshold and the provocative concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) histamine in either group. Thus sensory nerves can be activated with a tussive agent in patients with asthma and chronic airflow obstruction without causing bronchial smooth muscle contraction.     

The protective effect of a beta 2 agonist against excessive airway narrowing in response to bronchoconstrictor stimuli in asthma and chronic obstructive lung disease.

Beta 2 agonists reduce airway hypersensitivity to bronchoconstrictor stimuli acutely in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive lung disease. To determine whether these drugs also protect against excessive airway narrowing, the effect of inhaled salbutamol on the position and shape of the dose-response curves for histamine or methacholine was investigated in 12 patients with asthma and 11 with chronic obstructive lung disease. After pretreatment with salbutamol (200 or 400 micrograms) or placebo in a double blind manner dose-response curves for inhaled histamine and methacholine were obtained by a standard method on six days in random order. Airway sensitivity was defined as the concentration of histamine or methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20). A maximal response plateau on the log dose-response curve was considered to be present if two or more data points for FEV1 fell within a 5% response range. In the absence of a plateau, the test was continued until a predetermined level of severe bronchoconstriction was reached. Salbutamol caused an acute increase in FEV1 (mean increase 11.5% predicted in asthma, 7.2% in chronic obstructive lung disease), and increase in PC20 (mean 15 fold in asthma, fivefold in chronic obstructive lung disease), and an increase in the slope of the dose-response curves in both groups. In subjects in whom a plateau of FEV1 response could be measured salbutamol did not change the level of the plateau. In subjects without a plateau salbutamol did not lead to the development of a plateau, despite achieving a median FEV1 of 44% predicted in asthma and 39% in chronic obstructive lung disease. These results show that, although beta 2 agonists acutely reduce the airway response to a given strength of bronchoconstrictor stimulus, they do not protect against excessive airflow obstruction if there is exposure to relatively strong stimuli. This, together with the steepening of the dose-response curve, could be a disadvantage of beta 2 agonists in the treatment of moderate and severe asthma or chronic obstructive lung disease.     

Relation of perceived nasal and bronchial hyperresponsiveness to FEV1, basophil counts, and methacholine response.

Perceived nasal and bronchial hyperresponsiveness to tobacco smoke and cold air were assessed in 912 working men in the Paris area. Baseline lung function measurements and peripheral leucocyte counts with standard differential counts were performed. At least one perceived nasal or bronchial hyperresponsiveness symptom was reported by 15.7%. Current smoking was significantly less frequent among those with cough induced by tobacco smoke. Rhinitis induced by cold air was associated with lower FEV1 (p less than 0.01) and the association remained after adjustment for smoking, asthma, and wheezing (p = 0.06). Symptoms induced by cold air were related to circulating basophils. Neither perceived nasal nor perceived bronchial hyperresponsiveness was significantly related to the airway response to methacholine in a sample of the group (n = 324) surveyed again five years later. The result suggest that the symptom of rhinitis provoked by cold air is a possible "new" risk factor or marker for chronic airflow limitation.     

Effects of cessation of terbutaline treatment on airway obstruction and responsiveness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Cessation of regular therapy with inhaled beta 2 agonists in patients with asthma may lead to a temporary deterioration of lung function and airway responsiveness. Few such studies have been reported in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), so an investigation was carried out to determine whether rebound airway responsiveness and rebound bronchoconstriction also occurs in COPD and if there is any relationship with the dose of beta 2 agonist being used. METHODS: Lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and peak expiratory flow (PEF)), airway responsiveness (PC20 methacholine (PC20)) and symptoms were assessed in a double blind, placebo controlled crossover study during and after cessation of two weeks regular treatment with placebo, and low dose (250 micrograms) and high dose (1000 micrograms) inhaled terbutaline via a dry powder inhaler (Turbohaler) all given three times a day. Sixteen non-allergic patients with COPD of mean (SD) age 58.7 (6.5) years, FEV1 57.1 (12.8)% of predicted, and reversibility on 1000 micrograms terbutaline of 4.5 (3.5)% predicted were studied. PC20 and FEV1 were measured 10, 14, 34 and 82 hours after the last inhalation of terbutaline or placebo. Measurements performed at 10, 14, and 34 hours were expressed relative to 82 hour values in each period, transformed into an area under the curve (AUC) value and analysed by ANOVA. RESULTS: Mean morning and evening PEF increased during terbutaline treatment. PC20 and FEV1 did not change after cessation of terbutaline treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Cessation of regular treatment with both low and high dose inhaled terbutaline does not result in a rebound bronchoconstriction and rebound airway responsiveness in patients with COPD.     

Effect of nifedipine on bronchoconstriction induced by inhalation of cold air

The effect of nifedipine (20 mg sublingually) on the bronchial response to cold air was studied in eight asthmatic patients and eight normal subjects. Eucapnic hyperventilation with dry subfreezing air was performed for three minutes by each subject, with a minute volume of 30 X FEV1 for normal subjects and half that for the asthmatics. In the normal subjects there was no difference in the falls in the one-second forced expiratory volume (FEV1) and specific airways conductance (sGaw) produced by cold air inhalation on the days when they were pretreated with placebo and with nifedipine. In asthmatic patients, however, significant protection with nifedipine was demonstrated. The maximum recorded fall in FEV1 was reduced from 13% +/- 2% (SE) to 4% +/- 2% (p less than 0.005) and the maximum fall in sGaw from 35% +/- 5% to 17% +/- 4% (p less than 0.002). The possible causes of this difference are discussed. It is suggested that these results present further evidence for a different mechanism of response to cold air in asthmatic and normal subjects.     

Relation of the hypertonic saline responsiveness of the airways to exercise induced asthma symptom severity and to histamine or methacholine reactivity.

BACKGROUND: Conflicting views exist over whether responsiveness of the airways to hypertonic saline relates to non-specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness measured by histamine or methacholine challenge. The bronchoconstrictor responses to exercise and hypertonic saline are reported to be closely related, but the relationship between the symptoms of exercise induced asthma and airway responsiveness to hypertonic saline is not known. METHODS: In 29 asthmatic patients with a history of exercise induced asthma, the response to an ultrasonically nebulised hypertonic saline (3.6% sodium chloride) aerosol, measured as the volume of hypertonic saline laden air required to produce a fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of > or = 20% (PD20), was compared with the concentration of histamine (PC20; group 1) and methacholine (PC20; group 2) producing a 20% fall in baseline FEV1 and exercise induced asthma symptom severity score (groups 1 and 2). The hypertonic responsiveness was determined in a dose-response manner to a maximum dose of 310 1 and the exercise induced asthma symptom severity was scored on a scale of 0-5. RESULTS: Of the 29 patients, 23 (79%) were responsive to the hypertonic saline, with PD20 values ranging from 9 to 310 1. A significant correlation was found between the PD20 hypertonic saline and the exercise induced asthma symptom score. There was no significant correlation between the PD20 response to hypertonic saline and the histamine PC20 or methacholine PC20. The exclusion of those subjects who failed to respond to hypertonic saline improved the relationship between hypertonic saline and methacholine PC20. No significant correlation was found between the exercise induced asthma symptom score and histamine PC20 or methacholine PC20. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that hypertonic saline responsiveness bears a closer relationship to the severity of exercise induced asthma symptoms than to the non-specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness measured by histamine or methacholine reactivity.     

Perception of airflow obstruction and associated breathlessness in normal and asthmatic subjects: correlation with anxiety and bronchodilator needs.

BACKGROUND--Perception of bronchoconstriction varies between individuals and its determinants remain to be identified. The perception of airflow obstruction and breathlessness during induced bronchoconstriction was studied, and the effects of anxiety, repetition of the stimulus, and bronchodilator needs on these measurements were examined in normal and asthmatic subjects. METHODS--Fifteen normal (control) and 25 asthmatic subjects had two consecutive methacholine inhalation tests to induce a 20-50% fall in FEV1. Evaluation of the perceived magnitude of airflow obstruction, breathlessness, level of anxiety generated, and bronchodilator needs was obtained before each FEV1 measurement on a modified Borg scale from 0 to 10. RESULTS--Mean (SE) maximal fall in FEV1 in asthmatic and control subjects was of similar magnitude: test 1, 37.6 (1.4)% and 38.7 (3.1)%, and test 2, 36.0 (1.6)% and 27.7 (2.4)% respectively. There was a large interindividual variation in perception of airflow obstruction and breathlessness but, although they were well correlated in asthmatic subjects, they were perceived differently by the control subjects. Perception of airflow obstruction was greater in asthmatic subjects. The level of anxiety and the bronchodilator use were low and did not influence perception. CONCLUSIONS--During induced bronchoconstriction, the overall perception of airflow obstruction and breathlessness were similar among asthmatic subjects but controls showed a higher perception of airflow obstruction for any given level of breathlessness. Asthmatic subjects perceived airflow obstruction and breathlessness to a greater degree than did controls but anxiety and bronchodilator need were not correlated with respiratory sensation. The variability of bronchodilator use for similar degrees of bronchoconstriction suggests that it may be misleading to assess the severity of asthma control using only this indirect measure.     

Inhibition by sodium cromoglycate of bronchoconstriction stimulated by respiratory heat loss: comparison of pressurised aerosol and powder

The protective effect was examined of three doses (2, 10, and 20 mg) of sodium cromoglycate inhaled from a pressurised metered dose inhaler on the response to isocapnic hyperventilation of cold dry air in 10 asthmatic subjects. This was compared with the effect of cromoglycate powder (20 mg) inhaled from a Spincap and with placebo given on two occasions. The medications were inhaled on separate days, in random order and with the use of a double blind double dummy technique, 20 minutes before isocapnic hyperventilation of two fold increasing volumes of air (-15 degrees C, 0% humidity) to produce a 20% fall in the post-treatment FEV1. The response was expressed as the provocative dose of respiratory heat loss required to cause a fall in FEV1 of 15% (PD15, kcal/min). The mean baseline spirometric indices exceeded 85% of predicted normal values on each test day; both placebo treatments reduced the baseline FEV1 by comparison with all active treatments (p less than 0.0001). Comparison of the PD15 on the two placebo days confirmed excellent reproducibility. All doses of cromoglycate shifted the respiratory heat loss dose-response curve to the right of the placebo curve; PD15 after all active treatments exceeded PD15 after placebo (p less than 0.0001). There was no cromoglycate dose-response relationship between the three doses of aerosol (p greater than 0.05), or between any dose of aerosol and powder (p greater than 0.05). It is concluded that cromoglycate aerosol inhaled from a pressurised inhaler in a dose of 2 mg gives the same magnitude of protection against bronchoconstriction stimulated by airway cooling as 20 mg of pressurised aerosol or powder from a Spincap.     

Bronchial reactivity to methacholine after combined heart-lung transplantation.

The operation of combined heart-lung transplantation results in acute denervation of the heart, lungs, and airways below the level of the trachea. The bronchoconstrictor response to inhaled methacholine of 12 recipients of heart-lung transplants was compared with that of 12 recipients of heart transplants having similar medication and 12 normal subjects. The median dose of methacholine that produced a reduction of at least 20% in the FEV1 (PC20) for the recipients of heart-lung transplants (8 mg/ml) was significantly lower than that for the recipients of heart transplants (64 mg/ml) and normal subjects (greater than 64 mg/ml). The increased airway reactivity may be related to the effects of chronic pulmonary denervation or subclinical inflammation in the airways. The effect of denervation on the response to full inspiration during bronchoconstriction was studied in six patients with heart-lung transplants by means of partial and maximal forced expiratory manoeuvres. Four showed bronchodilation after a deep breath, indicating that this response can occur after extrinsic pulmonary denervation in man. The patients with heart-lung transplants described a "tight" sensation in the anterior chest during bronchoconstriction, indicating that this sensation is not dependent on pulmonary innervation.     

Effect of acute alterations in inspired oxygen tension on methacholine induced bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND: Recent in vitro and in vivo studies in animals have suggested that ambient oxygen tension may influence airway responsiveness to bronchoconstrictor stimuli. These observations may have relevance to the management of acute exacerbations of asthma. The present studies were designed to examine the influence of inspired oxygen tension (Fio2 1.0, 0.21, 0.15) on methacholine-induced broncho- constriction in patients with asthma. METHODS: In a dual study two groups of asthmatic patients performed methacholine inhalation challenges breathing either air (Fio2 0.21) or a hypoxic gas mixture (Fio2 0.15) in study 1 and air (Fio2 0.21) or hyperoxia (Fio2 1.0) in study 2. The gases were administered through a closed breathing circuit in a randomised double blind fashion. The PC20 values (dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were calculated after each methacholine challenge by linear interpolation from the logarithmic dose response curve. Plasma catecholamine levels were measured before and after methacholine challenges as well as heart rate, oxygen saturation, and percentage end tidal carbon dioxide levels. RESULTS: The geometric mean PC20 value for methacholine was significantly lower on the hypoxic study day than on the normoxic day in study 1 (mean difference in PC20 values 2.88 mg/ml (95% CI 1.4 to 5.3); p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the geometric mean PC20 value for methacholine between the hyperoxic and normoxic study days in study 2 (mean difference in PC20 values 1.45 mg/ ml (95% CI 0.83 to 2.51)). CONCLUSIONS: Acute hypoxia potentiates methacholine induced bronchoconstriction and acute hyperoxia has no effect in mild to moderate patients with stable asthma.




     

Circadian change in bronchial responsiveness and airflow obstruction in asthmatic children.

To throw light on the question of whether the increase in bronchial responsiveness seen during the night is due to increased airflow obstruction, nine asthmatic children with increased airflow obstruction at night (group 1) were compared with nine without (group 2). The mean fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) between 16.00 and 04.00 hours was 21.9% in group 1 and 2.3% in group 2. Selection of patients was based on the amplitude of change in peak expiratory flow (PEF) measured every four hours for three consecutive days at home. The study was performed in hospital on four consecutive days. Medication was withheld for three days before and during the measurements at home and in hospital. On the first day in hospital (day 4) FEV1 was measured every four hours for 24 hours. On day 6 inhaled histamine provocation tests were performed at the same times as the FEV1 measurements on day 4. Both groups showed a nocturnal fall in the provocative dose of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20). The mean change in histamine PC20 from 16.00 to 04.00 hours was 1.1 doubling doses of histamine in group 1 and 1.5 doubling doses in group 2. The results indicate that the increase in nocturnal bronchial responsiveness that occurs at night is not due to an increase in airflow obstruction.     

Comparison of in vivo airway responsiveness and in vitro smooth muscle sensitivity to methacholine in man

Airway responsiveness to methacholine varies between normal people and is increased in patients with asthma. The importance of airway smooth muscle sensitivity in determining in vivo responsiveness is unknown. We have examined this question by comparing in vivo airway responsiveness with in vitro airway smooth muscle sensitivity to methacholine in 10 patients undergoing thoracic surgery. In vivo responsiveness was determined by administration of inhalations of doubling concentrations of methacholine. Results were expressed as the provocation concentration (PC) causing a decrease in forced expiratory volume in one second of 20% (PC20FEV1), specific airway conductance of 35% (PC35SGaw), and maximal expiratory flow at 35% vital capacity, measured for the partial (V35(p)) and complete (V35(c)) flow volume curves, of 35% (PC35V35(p); PC35V35(c)). In vitro airway smooth muscle sensitivity was determined from specimens obtained at thoracotomy. Log dose-response curves to methacholine were constructed and the concentration causing a 50% maximum contraction (EC50) was derived. There were differences between patients for both in vivo airway responsiveness and in vitro smooth muscle sensitivity to methacholine. There were no significant relationships between the in vivo and in vitro measurements. The results suggest that factors other than solely the sensitivity of smooth muscle must determine in vivo airway responsiveness to methacholine.     

Prevalence of bronchial reactivity to inhaled methacholine in New Zealand children.

The prevalence of bronchial hyperreactivity to inhaled methacholine and of a clinical history of symptoms of asthma was determined in a birth cohort of 9 year old New Zealand children. A history of current or previous recurrent wheezing was obtained in 220 of 815 children. Of 800 who had spirometric tests, 27 (3.4%) had resting airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC less than 75%). Methacholine challenge was undertaken without problem in 766 children, the abbreviated protocol being based on five breaths and four concentrations. A fall in FEV1 of more than 20% was observed in 176 children (23% of challenges, 22% of the full cohort) after inhalation of methacholine in concentrations of up to 25 mg/ml. The prevalence of bronchial reactivity in children with symptoms was related to the frequency of wheezing episodes in the last year, and the degree of reactivity to the interval since the last episode. Sixty four children (8.0%) with no history of wheeze or recurrent dry cough were, however, also responsive to methacholine 25 mg/ml or less, while 35% of children with current or previous wheezing did not respond to any dose of methacholine. Bronchial challenge by methacholine inhalation was not sufficiently sensitive or specific to be useful as a major criterion for the diagnosis of asthma in epidemiological studies. The occurrence of airway reactivity in children without symptoms of asthma, however, raises the possibility that adult onset asthma and the development of airways obstruction in some subjects with chronic bronchitis could have origins in childhood.     

Effect of methacholine induced bronchoconstriction on the pulmonary distribution and plasma pharmacokinetics of inhaled sodium cromoglycate in subjects with normal and hyperreactive airways.

Inhalation treatment may be less effective in the presence of bronchoconstriction because of the reduced penetration of drugs into the airways. The effect of bronchoconstriction on the lung deposition and plasma pharmacokinetics of inhaled sodium cromoglycate was examined. Ten subjects attended the laboratory on three occasions. On the first occasion a bronchial provocation test was performed to determine the concentration of methacholine required to reduce the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) by 20% (PC20). On the two subsequent occasions subjects inhaled either saline or their PC20 methacholine, followed five minutes later by an aerosol containing sodium cromoglycate and stannous phytate labelled with technetium-99m. Twenty minutes later a gamma emission lung scan was performed to determine the intrathoracic deposition of the nebulised aerosol. The central:peripheral (C:P) ratio of lung deposition was then calculated. Measurements of FEV1 were made and blood samples taken for analysis of plasma sodium cromoglycate concentration at intervals for four hours. Methacholine led to a 23.4% (SEM 0.6%) lower FEV1 and a 2.8 times higher C:P ratio than those observed after saline. There was a direct correlation between log PC20 methacholine and the increase in the C:P ratio (r = 0.81). Despite these changes with methacholine, the plasma pharmacokinetics of inhaled sodium cromoglycate were not significantly different after methacholine and after saline, except that the maximum concentration achieved (Cmax) was increased. These observations suggest that the area of cromoglycate deposition and the anatomical site are less important in determining the plasma pharmacokinetics of cromoglycate than is the total dose delivered to the lung.     

In vitro and in vivo effect of verapamil on human airway responsiveness to leukotriene D4.

The mechanism by which leukotriene D4 (LTD4) induces airway narrowing in man is unclear. We have investigated this by examining the effect of the calcium channel blocker verapamil on the sensitivity of in vitro preparations of human bronchi to LTD4 and methacholine, and on the bronchoconstriction induced in normal subjects by these agonists in vivo. In vitro smooth muscle sensitivity was assessed by the concentration of LTD4 and methacholine causing a 50% of maximum contraction (EC50) and as the maximum tension generated. Verapamil did not alter baseline tension or the response to LTD4 but did inhibit contractile responses to methacholine. In vivo studies were performed in six normal subjects; they inhaled increasing concentrations of LTD4 (0.4-50 micrograms/ml) or methacholine (2-64 mg/ml). Airway responsiveness in vivo was expressed as the provocation concentration (PC) of agonist producing a 35% fall in specific airways conductance (PC35sGaw) and a 30% fall in flow at 30% of vital capacity (PC30 V30(p)). Verapamil did not alter baseline sGaw or V30(p). One subject did not respond to LTD4 on either day. In contrast to the in vitro results, verapamil produced a greater than 10 fold reduction in LTD4 induced bronchoconstriction, but had no effect on methacholine induced bronchoconstriction. These results suggest that in normal subjects bronchoconstriction induced by inhaled LTD4 is due to a combination of direct and indirect mechanisms.     

Effect of oral terfenadine on the bronchoconstrictor response to inhaled histamine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate in non-atopic asthma.

Inhaled adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) causes bronchoconstriction in atopic asthma, probably after in vivo conversion to adenosine. It has been suggested that adenosine potentiates preformed mediator release from mast cells on the mucosal surface of the airways by interacting with specific purinoceptors, without affecting the release of newly generated mediators. The airway response of nine non-atopic subjects with "intrinsic" asthma to inhaled AMP and the influence of the oral, selective H1 histamine receptor antagonist terfenadine on this response was investigated. The geometric mean provocation concentrations of histamine and AMP required to produce a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) were 1.82 and 13 mmol/l. In subsequent placebo controlled time course studies the FEV1 response to a single inhalation of the PC20 histamine was ablated after pretreatment with oral terfenadine 180 mg. This dose of terfenadine caused an 80% inhibition of the bronchoconstrictor response to the PC20 AMP when measured as the area under the time course-response curve and compared with the response to PC20 AMP preceded by placebo. Terfenadine 600 mg failed to increase protection against AMP further, but both doses of terfenadine delayed the time at which the mean maximum fall in FEV1 after AMP was achieved. Terfenadine 180 mg had no effect on methacholine induced bronchoconstriction in the same subjects. These data suggest that inhaled AMP may potentiate the release of preformed mediators from preactivated mast cells in the bronchial mucosa of patients with intrinsic asthma.