高影响因子外科学外文期刊近5年发表口腔医学文献分析

目的:了解高影响因子外科学外文期刊发表的口腔医学论文情况,为我国口腔颌面外科医师论文投稿提供参考信息。方法:对2002年影响因子在1.000以上的58种外科学外文期刊近5年(1999年至2003年)发表的口腔医学论文进行检索分析。结果:共有20种影响因子在1.000以上的外文期刊发表了10篇以上的口腔医学论文。结论:我国口腔颌面外科医师应深入了解这些期刊及所发表的口腔医学论文的特点,并有针对性地向高影响因子外科学外文期刊投稿。     

其他

2001-2006年国内循证口腔医学文献分析；医学学术会议综合管理系统的建立及在第七届全国正畸大会上的应用；口腔医疗摄影技巧Ⅵ口腔颌面外科的临床摄影技巧（二）（讲座）；口腔卫生人力资源预测的现状（综述）；口腔医疗摄影技巧Ⅶ口腔种植的临床摄影技巧（讲座）．     

20年来我国口腔医学学术会议论文的变化研究

目的探讨近20年我国口腔医学研究论文的发展状况。方法将1988年和2001年两届全国口腔医学学术会议论文汇编中的摘要在《中国生物医学文献数据库》、《中国期刊全文数据库》、《中文科技期刊数据库》以及"万方数据库医药子系统"4个主要中文期刊数据库中进行逐篇查阅,比较口腔基础、口腔内科、口腔外科、口腔修复、口腔正畸等各学科的论文在杂志上的发表率、发表周期,以及在各口腔医学杂志中的分布情况。结果1988年和2001年会议论文发表率分别为63.23%和62.91%,两者差异无统计学意义(P=0.945)。其中1988年尚无口腔基础论文这一项,在2001年其发表率为78.57%,高于其他各学科。口腔外科的论文发表率降低18.10%。1988年和2001年会议论文的总体发表周期由1988年的会议当年至会后5年缩短至2001年的会前1年至会后4年。1988年会议论文集中发表在7种口腔医学杂志及大学学报中,2001年会议论文分散发表在10种口腔医学杂志及大学学报中。结论全国口腔医学学术会议论文的总发表率未见明显变化,但组成结构改变,发表周期缩短1年。口腔医学的相关杂志种类增多,论文发表的集中程度降低。     

《口腔颌面外科杂志》2004—2008年载文分析

目的:分析《口腔颌面外科杂志》的载文特点。方法:利用文献计量学方法统计2004—2008年出版的5卷22期《口腔颌面外科杂志》的文献计量学指标。结果:《口腔颌面外科杂志》5年的总载文量为641篇,平均基金论文比为0.30;合著论文占90.80%,作者分布在全国28个省、自治区和直辖市;发文数量在3篇以上的作者有18位,共发表论文63篇,占9.83%;641篇论文的总引文量为6083条,引文率为93.92%,外文引文占70.43%。结论:《口腔颌面外科杂志》是我国口腔颌面外科领域重要信息源之一。     

人物介绍

<正>《口腔颌面外科杂志》副主编张志愿教授简介张志愿,男,1951年5月生,主任医师、教授、博士生导师;上海交通大学口腔医学院院长、第九人民医院院长、上海市口腔医学研究所所长,上海市重点学科——口腔颌面外科、教育部国家级重点学科学科带头人,上海市口腔医学重点实验室主任。现为国务院学位委员会成员,兼任中华口腔医学会副会长、中华口腔医学会口腔颌面外科专业委员会主任委员、中国抗癌协会头颈肿瘤外科专业委员会副主任委员。为英国爱丁堡皇家牙医学院院士、国际牙医学院院士、香港牙科医学院荣誉院士、日本大阪齿科大学客座教授。是《上海口腔医学》主编,《中华口腔医学杂志》、《中国口腔颌面外科杂志》、《口腔颌面外科杂志》、《口腔医学年鉴》副主编,全国高等医药院校五年制临床医学专业规划教材《口腔科学》(第五、六、七版)主编。     

《中国口腔颌面外科杂志》被收录为“中国科技论文统计源期刊”

2005年5月，经中国科学技术信息研究所的多项学术指标综合评定及多位同行专家的严格评审，《中国口腔颌面外科杂志》自2004年第1期始被收录为“中国科技论文统计源期刊”(中国科技核心期刊)。《中国口腔颌面外科杂志》为中华口腔医学会口腔颌面外科专业委员会会刊，属中央级专业学术类科技期刊，国内外公开发行，主要介绍口腔颌面外科及相关医学领域的新成果和新经验，供口腔颌面外科及相关学科的中高级临床医师、教学及科研人员参阅。     

2003年中国口腔医学期刊来源指标（汉语拼音为序）

刊名来源参考平均平均地区机构国际基金文献量文献量引文量作者数分布数数论文比论文比北京口腔医学897348.253.1517370.000.17华西口腔医学杂志14311838.274.3818440.010.55口腔颌面外科杂志1159978.673.5620700.000.14口腔颌面修复学杂志1127947.093.1922650.000.22口腔医学18610865.843.14211260.020.14口腔医学研究17013277.813.7622690.040.28口腔正畸学474449.453.0916250.020.15临床口腔医学杂志33524427.293.70251420.010.21上海口腔医学15212758.393.5914640.020.19实用口腔医学杂志20514176.913.9524980.010.21现代口腔医学杂志17…     

其他

高影响因子肿瘤学外文期刊近5年发表口腔肿瘤学文献分析／刘兰平…∥中国口腔颌面外科杂志．老年口腔修复的特点／刘洪臣…∥中华老年口腔医学杂志，独一味治疗口腔出血性疾病的临床应用／嵇建国…∥口腔医学．血友病患者口腔出血的处理／陈声莲…∥广东牙病防治．     

信息

《中国口腔颌面外科杂志》征订启事《中国口腔颌面外科杂志》(China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery)系中华口腔医学会口腔颌面外科专业委员会会刊,由卫生部主管,中华口腔医学会主办,中华口腔医学会口腔颌面外科专业委员会承办,于2003年3月正式创刊。中国标准刊号CN 11-4980/R,ISSN 1672-3244。由著名口腔颌面外科专家、口腔医学     

我国口腔颌面外科临床随机对照试验的报告质量评价

目的对2000-2009年发表的属于我国口腔颌面外科范畴的随机对照试验（RCT）的报告质量进行评价,了解我国口腔颌面外科临床试验报告质量的现状。方法采用计算机检索中国生物医学文献数据库、维普中文科技期刊数据库和中国期刊全文数据库,同时配合手工检索2000-2009年我国19种口腔医学期刊发表的文献,纳入属于口腔颌面外科范畴且声明采用随机方法分组的RCT,并采用国际公认的临床试验报告统一标准（CONSORT）进行报告质量评价。结果共纳入53篇RCT,根据CONSORT条目对其进行评价,RCT的报告质量普遍不高,平均得分仅为（8.2±2.5）分。结论2000-2009年发表的属于我国口腔颌面外科范畴的RCT报告质量与CONSORT标准比较尚有较大差距,今后的报告应进一步规范。     

国内防治放(化)疗所致口腔黏膜炎研究文献的循证医学分析

目的：评价国内口腔放疗和（或）化疗所致口腔黏膜炎文献的研究质量及治疗方法的有效性。方法：检索中国期刊网全文数据库（CNKI）和中国生物医学文献光盘数据库（CBMDisc）,按照国际循证医学标准对其中采取随机对照设计（randomized controlled trial,RCT）的有关口腔黏膜炎的疗效研究文献进行分析。结果：共检索到论著98篇,符合纳入标准的RCT文献22篇。从设计类型、诊断标准、疗效评定、不良反应等方面对上述文献进行分析。结论：我国治疗口腔黏膜炎的RCT文献无法进行Meta分析;粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子（GM-CSF）具有较好的短期疗效。     

RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS IN DENTAL JOURNALS ON CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

BackgroundRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) in dentistry provide essential evidence for dentists to practice evidence-based dentistry. This study aimed to analyze the scientific impacts of the RCTs conducted among children and adolescents published in dental journals and summarize the main contents of these studies.MethodsAn electronic literature search was conducted in the database Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection by two independent reviewers in June 2020, without an initial time limit. Articles reporting on RCTs conducted among children and adolescents in dental fields were identified. The most cited articles (the top 100 articles based on total citation counts and citation density) were selected. The bibliometric data were exported from the database WoS for further analysis. The citation counts were cross-checked in Google Scholar. In addition, the main content of the included RCTs was extracted and summarized.ResultsA total of 132 papers published in 28 journals reporting on RCTs in dentistry on children and adolescents were included in this study. The mean total citation count (within WoS) of the included RCTs was 60.0, ranging from 17 to 300, and the mean citation density value was 4.6, ranging from 1.3 to 15.0. The majority of the articles were in the thematic field of cariology (n = 79, 59.8%). Other thematic fields, orthodontology (20.5%), endodontology (5.3%), behavior science and quality of life (5.3%), oral and maxillofacial surgery (3.8%), oral hygiene (3.8%) and periodontology (1.5%) were involved as well. Around one-fifth of the articles (n = 23) were produced by the United States, and the included articles were most cited by the publications (n = 1937) from the United States as well.ConclusionsA wide range of dental topics were covered in the included RCTs conducted among children and adolescents. These top-cited RCTs mainly focus on the thematic field of cariology. The United States is an influential country with a large number of publication outputs and citations.     

A bibliometric analysis of the pediatric dental literature in MEDLINE.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the availability of dental literature between 1989 and 1998 in seven disciplines within pediatric dentistry by using a bibliometric analysis on MEDLINE and to compare the results to that for adolescents and adults. METHODS: A search strategy was developed for each discipline incorporating dental vocabulary obtained from the MEDLINE Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) index. The number of articles retrieved from MEDLINE for adolescents and adults (> 13 yo) was compared to those for children (< 12 yo) in seven dental disciplines: dental implants, endodontics, oral medicine/radiology, oral surgery, orthodontics, periodontics, and restorative dentistry. RESULTS: There was an average of 8,097 dental articles published each year for the combined seven disciplines studied with an eight-fold range from 327 articles/year for endodontics to 2,765 articles/year for oral medicine/radiology. Of the mean number of articles published each year, 1,273 (16%) were limited to children, while the remaining 6,824 (84%) were on adolescents and adults. The number and percentage of children articles relative to the total number of publications on children ranged from 7 articles/year (1%) for dental implants to 528 articles/year (42%) for oral medicine/radiology. Implant dentistry publications increased the fastest, growing at an average yearly rate of 25%, followed by restorative dentistry (9%), endodontics (9%), oral surgery (6%), orthodontics (6%), periodontics (3%), and oral medicine/radiology (2%). CONCLUSIONS: There is a substantial amount of literature in pediatric dentistry upon which to base clinical decisions. Within this large body of literature, there is a significant amount of variation between the various dental disciplines examined. To stay current, one would need to read and absorb approximately 24 articles each week over 52 weeks per year in more than 75 different journals. Furthermore, the volume of literature is increasing each year, making access even more difficult. These trends suggest the need for computer systems that will facilitate access and retrieval of clinically useful literature.     

A bibliometric analysis of periodontology

This bibliometric study assessed periodontal/implant articles that were part of the five most‐cited dental articles in each of the years 2005‐2019. Periodontal/implant articles made up one to four articles in each of 14 years and totaled 40% of the yearly five most‐cited dental articles. The three core periodontal journals (Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Journal of Periodontology, and Periodontology 2000) increased ~50%‐100% in Journal Impact Factor from 2005 to 2015 and were among the 10 most‐cited dental journals in the 2015‐2019 period. The Journal of Clinical Periodontology and Periodontology 2000 were in several years assigned the highest Journal Impact Factor in dentistry. In summary, periodontal journals continue to publish high‐impact articles that are relevant for both oral health care and medicine.     

Evidence-based dentistry: a clinician's perspective

Evidence-based dentistry is a discipline that provides best, explicit-based evidence to dentists and their patients in shared decision-making. Currently, dentists are being trained and directed to adopt the role of translational researchers in developing evidence-based dental practices. Practically, evidence-based dentistry is not usable in its current mode for the provision of labor-intensive services that characterize current dental practice. The purpose of this article is to introduce a model of evidence-based dental practice. This model conceptualizes a team approach in explaining problems and solutions to change current dental practice. These changes constitute an evidence-based dental practice that involves the electronic chart, centralized database, knowledge management software, and personnel in optimizing effective oral health care to dental patients.     

灼口综合征疗效研究文献循证医学分析

目的 :评价国内灼口综合征疗效研究文献报道的治疗方法的有效性及其研究质量。方法 :通过联合检索中国医学生物资料数据库 (CMB)和中文科技期刊数据库 (VIP) ,获得研究方案为随机对照试验 (RCT ) ,研究对象为灼口综合征患者的论著 ,并依据循证医学方法对其进行分析。结果 :共检索到 47篇论著 ,符合纳入标准的有 11篇。RCT论著数量较少 ,研究质量不高 ,无法进行Meta分析。就目前已有文献而言 ,芦笋精胶囊治疗灼口综合征具有较好的短期疗效。维生素B1和B12 相关神经封闭治疗的效果优于口服维生素治疗。结论 :目前国内灼口综合征疗效研究文献的数量及质量均不能满足临床要求 ,需要更多高质量的研究 ,以为该病的治疗提供最佳证据     

Systematic review of the evidence supporting intra-oral maxillofacial prosthodontic care

The literature on maxillofacial prosthodontics may be considered to be dominated by articles describing case reports or case series. Prospective, well-controlled clinical trials are scarce owing to the inherent difficulty of performing such trials in patients suffering from oral cancer. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature relating to intra-oral maxillofacial prosthodontics based on the principles of evidence-based dentistry. A detailed report of the findings is presented and critically assessed and a discussion of the outcome in respect to the various confounding factors is carried out. Finally, suggestions for future research in the field of maxillofacial prosthodontics are made.