耳内镜下鼓膜修补术

目的探讨应用耳内镜下鼓膜修补术治疗鼓膜穿孔的疗效.方法应用单手操作行前内植后夹层法鼓膜成形术,治疗30耳鼓膜穿孔.结果有28耳愈合良好听力提高较为满意,穿孔愈合率为93.3%,与在显微镜下手术疗效无明显差异.结论应用耳内镜手术治疗鼓膜穿孔方便、灵活、视野好,为一较理想的手术方法.     

两种鼓膜修补法的临床疗效观察

目的探讨内植法鼓膜修补术与夹层法鼓膜修补术修补鼓膜穿孔的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析63例（66耳）行内植法鼓膜修补术与夹层法鼓膜修补术修补鼓膜的临床资料,对两种修补方法治愈率进行分析。结果全部患者术后随访时间6个月,内植法鼓膜修补术组32耳愈合率为90.63%（29/32）,平均听力提高14.5dB;夹层法鼓膜修补术组34耳愈合率为91.18%（31/34）,平均听力提高15.7dB。两种手术方法在鼓膜愈合率及听力提高方面无统计学差异。结论内植法鼓膜修补术与夹层法鼓膜修补术是两种有效的鼓膜修补方法 ,临床上可以酌情选用。     

耳内镜下鼓膜成形术的临床应用

目的 探讨耳内镜下经外耳道鼓膜成形术的手术方法并观察其疗效.方法 59例鼓膜穿孔患者,依据鼓膜穿孔面积及边缘有无残余鼓膜,在耳内镜下经外耳道行内植或双“门形”皮瓣法内植法鼓膜修补术.结果 术后随访1～6个月,一期治愈率94.9％.结论 耳内镜下经外耳道鼓膜成形术疗效好、创伤小,可部分代替显微镜下鼓膜成形术.     

中耳炎鼓膜小穿孔耳内镜治疗的研究

目的　探讨鼓膜小穿孔的慢性化脓性中耳炎耳内镜下手术修补方式的选择。方法　回顾性分析2016年3月～2018年10月我科诊治的90例慢性化脓性中耳炎鼓膜小穿孔患者,根据修补方式（内置法或夹层法）和手术时鼓室黏膜情况（干耳或湿耳）,观察对比鼓膜愈合率及术后3个月听力改善情况。结果　90例患者干性穿孔53例,鼓膜穿孔边缘潮湿者（湿耳）37例;内植法64例,夹层法26例。术后鼓膜一期愈合87例,夹层法术后鼓膜愈合率高于内植法,但两者比较差异无统计学意义（P =0.554）。湿耳组中夹层法修复鼓膜成功率高于内植法,两者比较差异有统计学意义（Fisher确切概率法P =0.047）。术后3个月平均气导听阈较术前显著提高,差异有统计学意义 （t =5.055,P＜0.05）,气骨导差明显缩小与术前比较,差异有统计学意义（t =5.351,P＜0.05）。结论　耳内镜下内置法鼓膜成形术治疗中耳炎鼓膜小穿孔,有微创、便捷和疗效确切等优势。针对鼓膜穿孔边缘潮湿、耳漏反复发作及前上象限穿孔者,该术式需慎重考虑,应优先选择夹层法鼓膜成形术。     

耳后进路-夹层法鼓膜成形术（附285例疗效分析）

目的分析慢性化脓性中耳炎及外伤性鼓膜穿孔患者行耳后进路-夹层法鼓膜成形术后的疗效。方法回顾性分析285例（308耳）行耳后进路-夹层法鼓膜成形术患者的临床资料。结果术后随访281耳（91．23％）鼓膜愈合，287耳（93．18％）术后气骨导差值在15dBHL以内；213耳术后气骨导差缩小≥15dBHL（包括15dB）听力提高69．16％，21耳术前、术后气骨导差值未改善（仍在15-30dBHL之间），占6．82％。无耳鸣、面瘫等严重并发症出现。结论慢性化脓性中耳炎和外伤性鼓膜穿孔患者行耳后进路-夹层法鼓膜成形术后鼓膜愈合率高，多数患者听力改善。     

耳内镜下鼓膜修补术治疗鼓膜穿孔的临床疗效

鼓膜修补术是临床治疗鼓膜穿孔、提高听力的唯一有效方法。临床治疗鼓膜穿孔的方法很多,如耳内镜下行内植法、外植法、夹层法等,疗效不一。我科自2005年3月-2008年3月行耳内镜下鼓膜修补术治疗鼓膜穿孔45例,效果满意,现报道如下。1资料与方法1.1临床资料本组鼓膜穿孔患者45例,均为单耳发病,其中男13例,女32例;年龄20-45岁,     

耳内镜下边缘性鼓膜穿孔的治疗

目的探讨耳内镜下治疗边缘性鼓膜穿孔方法和技巧.方法在耳内镜下对22例边缘性鼓膜穿孔患者行鼓室成形术治疗,术中采用耳道"筒形"皮瓣法或双"门形"皮瓣法内植修复鼓膜.结果经3-18个月随访,一次手术治愈率为86.4%.无耳鸣发生或加重,无面瘫、骨导听力下降等并发症发生.结论耳内镜下鼓室成形术是一种安全、简单、微创治疗边缘性鼓膜穿孔的方法,采用双"门形"皮瓣法内植修复边缘性鼓膜穿孔更为简便.     

不同材料鼓室成形术的临床疗效观察

目的探讨不同材料下(颞肌筋膜、薄层软骨-软骨膜瓣复合物)行改良夹层法鼓膜成形术的疗效。方法对100耳患慢性化脓性中耳炎的鼓膜穿孔患者,随机双盲法行自体颞肌筋膜(对照组)及薄层软骨-软骨膜瓣复合物(研究组)行改良夹层法鼓膜成形术,分别就术后愈合情况、听力效果及鼓室曲线等进行临床观察及统计学分析。结果①鼓膜穿孔者,愈合效果组间无差异(P>0.05)。②鼓膜大穿孔者,听力及鼓室曲线等研究组优于对照组(P<0.05)③鼓膜中、小穿孔,听力及鼓室曲线等对照组优于研究组(P>0.05)。结论修补鼓膜穿孔时,鼓膜愈合情况两组无统计学差异;修补鼓膜大穿孔时,听力及鼓室曲线研究组明显优于对照组,远期听力效果较好,对于鼓膜中、小穿孔,对照组明显优于研究组。     

内植法鼓膜修补术——自制鼓膜刮匙的应用及长期效果观察

目的探讨用自制刮匙刮除鼓膜穿孔缘鳞状上皮行内植法鼓膜修补术的临床效果。方法共对386例（398耳）用自制的鼓膜内层上皮刮匙刮除鼓膜穿孔缘残留鳞状上皮或掀起耳道深部皮肤，取颞肌筋膜行内植法鼓膜修补术。结果经2年以上随访，11耳再度穿孔，387耳穿孔修补成功。术后1至3个月纯音测听示听力改善率达97．2％。结论用自制刮匙刮除鼓膜穿孔缘残留鳞状上皮行内植法鼓膜修补术效果满意。     

不同鼓膜成形术治疗慢性化脓性中耳炎静止期的临床分析

目的探讨慢性化脓性中耳炎静止期患者采用不同鼓膜成形术的疗效分析,为手术术式选择提供参考。方法收集2010年1月~2013年12月完成鼓膜成形术,术后随访3个月且资料完整的212例患者,其中小穿孔（<3 mm）29例,中穿孔（3~6 mm）53例,大穿孔（>6 mm）79例,完全穿孔51例。按照患者鼓膜穿孔大小选择不同鼓膜修补手术方法,其中脂肪修补10例,内植法（经耳道）13例,全翻内植法47例,内外植法48例,夹层法80例,外植法14例。术后3个月判断其临床疗效。结果一期愈合95．7％(203例),钝角愈合1.9%（4例）,未愈合2.4%（5例）;术后对鼓膜穿孔大、小、完全穿孔患者采取不同鼓膜修补方式进行比较,患者手术前后鼓膜愈合和气导PTA提高比较,差异无统计学无意义（P>0.05）;鼓膜中穿孔患者采取的3种修补手术方法中,鼓膜愈合数比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,而对于采用夹层法和内外植法的气导PTA提高比较差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论术者应掌握多种不同鼓膜成形术方法,根据鼓膜穿孔的大小、位置和外耳道的宽窄、曲直,灵活选用,最大程度的恢复鼓膜的完整性和功能。     

耳内镜下内衬法与夹层法鼓膜修补术的疗效观察

目的 对耳内镜下内衬法和夹层法完成慢性化脓性中耳炎(CSOM)患者鼓膜修补术进行疗效观察.方法 回顾性分析2019年6月-2021年6月收治的经耳内镜内衬法和夹层法行鼓膜修补的CSOM患者的临床资料,共66例CSOM患者入组观察,随机分为两组由同一术者分别以内衬法(33例)和夹层法(33例)完成Ⅰ型鼓室成形术.比较其鼓...     

内外植法与内植法鼓膜成形术的近期对比分析

目的:探讨内外植法修补鼓膜的成功率和对听力的影响.方法:回顾性分析2002年以来行内植法鼓膜成形术且术后随访6个月以上的74例(77耳)患者,A组44例(45耳)采用传统的内植法,B组30例(32耳)将移植膜放置在残余鼓膜与锤骨柄之间(内外植法),比较2组患者术后3个月时的听力.结果:A组鼓膜1次修补成功40耳(89.0%),语言区平均听阈改善≥10 dB者23耳,手术成功率57.5%.B组鼓膜修补1次愈合28耳(87.5%),语言区平均听阈改善≥10 dB者23耳,手术成功率71.9%.并发症:A组再穿孔2耳(5.9%),鼓膜内陷8耳(17.8%);B组再穿孔2耳(6.25%),钝角愈合3耳(9.38%),鼓膜内陷2耳(6.25%).结论:将移植膜放置在残余鼓膜与锤骨柄之间可避免术后鼓膜和锤骨柄脱离,减少移植膜与鼓岬发生粘连.对鼓膜较大穿孔患者听力的改善明显优于移植膜放置在锤骨柄内侧者.     

Interlay method for myringoplasty.

Sixty-nine ears with perforation of the tympanic membrane were reviewed. All had undergone myringoplasty by the interlay method. The average period for complete epithelization was 16.1 days after surgery. Neither blunting of the anterior tympanomeatal angle nor lateralization of the tympanic membrane was observed. The success rate was 94.2% for the initial surgery, when "success" is defined as closure of the perforation and complete epithelization (dry ear). The surgical technique and various advantages of the interlay method of myringoplasty are described.     

Overlay versus underlay myringoplasty: report of outcomes considering closure of perforation and hearing function

In this series of patients, the underlay or overlay positioning of a graft achieves successful outcome for both repair of perforation and hearing function, with better hearing gain in the underlay group. In myringoplasty, the two most common techniques for positioning the graft relative to the remnant of both the tympanic membrane and the annulus are the "overlay" and the "underlay" techniques. 115 patients who underwent myringoplasty for tympanic membrane perforation secondary to chronic otitis media and/or trauma were included, and hearing function was evaluated. We prefer an overlay technique in subtotal perforations, in those involving the anterior and antero-inferior parts of the ear drum with respect to the handle of the malleus and in revision surgery. We reserve an underlay technique for smaller perforations and for those limited to the posterior part of the tympanic membrane. Of 115 cases, 63 underwent an overlay myringoplasty and 52 underlay myringoplasty. In the former group, five cases were anatomically unsuccessful, whereas in the second group there were three failures. The air bone gap improved significantly in both groups with a better hearing gain in the underlay group.     

Results of inlay cartilage myringoplasty in terms of closure of central tympanic membrane perforations

There is a current effort to perform myringoplasty for tympanic membrane perforations as a day-stay procedure. In 1998, an inlay myringoplasty using tragal cartilage/perichondrium was described. A retrospective study was performed by the author to analyse the results of inlay cartilage myringoplasty, in terms of closure of simple perforations of the tympanic membrane. The results of a control group of previous cases of underlay temporalis fascia myringoplasty were retrieved from the hospital records. All the operations in both groups were performed by the same author at the same institution. The operation of inlay cartilage butterfly myringoplasty has been performed in 28 ears with simple central tympanic membrane perforations. Inconsistent results have been obtained, in that only 43 per cent showed closure of the perforation at the most recent follow-up. A control group of standard underlay temporalis fascia myringoplasty has been performed by the same author in 23 ears. Eighty-three per cent of the perforations were closed at the last follow-up. The difference is statistically highly significant (p < 0.01).     

同种异体羊膜修补外伤性鼓膜穿孔

目的探讨采用同种异体羊膜对外伤性鼓膜穿孔进行鼓膜修补术的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2003年7月至2008年2月间在我科住院的27例外伤性鼓膜穿孔患者使用同种异体羊膜行鼓膜修补术,鼓膜穿孔愈合情况及听力提高的临床资料。结果全部患者随访时间超过6个月,鼓膜穿孔总愈合率为96.3%（26/27）,平均听力改善（12±3.7）dB。结论使用同种异体羊膜修补鼓膜,具有取材方便且量大,操作简便,组织相容性好,损伤小,疗效好的优点。     

Postoperative results of simple underlay myringoplasty in better hearing ears

CONCLUSIONS: Simple underlay myringoplasty with fibrin glue (SUM) is indicated for repair of tympanic membrane (TM) perforation in the better hearing ear because postoperative hearing deterioration is extremely rare. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the postoperative results, including the hearing and the re-perforation rate, in the better hearing ear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The procedure of SUM is removal of the perforation edge and bonding of the graft to the remnant TM with a few drops of fibrin glue by underlay technique. This method was applied to 75 patients with a perforated TM in the better hearing ear. The postoperative hearing and the re-perforation rate were investigated. RESULTS: The mean of the postoperative hearing gain was 10.3 dB and no cases of postoperative hearing loss were observed. Although postoperative re-perforation was found in 18 cases (24.0%), the re-perforation was closed in 16 of these cases in the outpatient department by the same procedure using frozen autologous tissue that had been harvested previously in surgery. Including these cases, the total success rate was 97.3%.     

Outcomes in children with perforated tympanic membranes after tympanostomy tube placement: results using a pilot treatment algorithm

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to examine the success of a pilot treatment algorithm for tympanic membrane perforations in children after tympanostomy tube placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of children with diagnosed tympanic membrane perforations after tympanostomy tube placement from 1998 to 2003 at a tertiary care children's hospital was performed. The patients had been treated according to an algorithm used by 2 pediatric otolaryngologists for management of tympanic membrane perforations: observation vs myringoplasty. Success rates were examined. RESULTS: Ninety-five children were identified, 27% of whom had nonhealing perforations after tube extrusion; 73% of the perforations were caused by a retained tube. The median duration of tube retention was 48 months, ranging from 13 to 120 months. After the treatment protocol, 76% of the patients underwent gelatin film or paper patch myringoplasty, 23% had adipose myringoplasty, and 1% were observed. Overall, 91% had healed perforations after the first intervention. Among those requiring a second intervention, the sizes of initial perforations were between 15% and 40%, with postrepair perforation sizes between 5% and 40%. In addition, 75% of those requiring a second intervention underwent tympanoplasty repair and 25% had fat patch myringoplasty. None required a third intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Our treatment algorithm for children with tympanic membrane perforations after tympanostomy tube placement appears to be successful and is an excellent model for other clinicians.