A double-blind, randomized study to compare recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (FSH; Gonal-F) with highly purified urinary FSH (Metrodin) HP) in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques including intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The French Multicentre Trialists

This prospective, double-blind, randomized, multicentre study compared the efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH; Gonal-F((R))) versus highly purified urinary FSH (u-hFSH HP; Metrodin((R)) HP) in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization, including intracytoplasmic sperm injection. A total of 278 patients began a long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocol, then 139 received r-hFSH and 139 u-hFSH HP, 150 IU/day administered s.c., for the first 6 days of treatment. On day 7, the dose was adjusted, if necessary, according to ovarian response. Human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG, 10 000 IU, s.c.) was administered once there was more than one follicle 18 mm in diameter and two others >/=16 mm. Oocyte retrieval was performed 36-38 h after HCG injection: 128 patients (92%) receiving r-hFSH and 113 (81%) receiving u-hFSH HP had at least one oocyte retrieved. Among patients receiving r-hFSH, there was a significantly higher mean (+/- SD) number of oocytes retrieved (11.0 +/- 5.9 versus 8.8 +/- 4.8 with u-hFSH HP; P = 0. 002) and mean number of embryos obtained (5.1 +/- 3.7 versus 3.5 +/- 2.9 with u-hFSH HP; P = 0.0001). With r-hFSH, significantly fewer FSH treatment days (11.7 +/- 1.9 versus 14.5 +/- 3.3) and 75 IU ampoules (27.6 +/- 10.2 versus 40.7 +/- 13.6) were required than with u-hFSH HP (P = 0.0001). Embryo replacement on day 2-3 after oocyte retrieval resulted in 36 liveborn children in the Gonal-F((R)) group and 33 in the Metrodin HP((R)) group (not significant). There were seven cases (5.0%) of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in the r-hFSH group and three (2.2%), in the u-hFSH HP group (not significant). It is concluded that r-hFSH is more effective than u-hFSH in inducing multiple follicular development.     

Recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH; Gonal-F) versus highly purified urinary FSH (Metrodin HP): results of a randomized comparative study in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques

A prospective, randomized, comparative, assessor-blind study was carried out in two centres to compare the efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH; Gonal-F) versus highly purified urinary FSH (u-hFSH HP; Metrodin HP), both administered s.c. in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization including intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). A total of 235 patients started a long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocol: 119 received r-hFSH and 114 received u-hFSH HP (150 IU/day) for the first 6 days. Two patients were excluded from the study because they mistakenly received the incorrect treatment combination. Human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG; 10000 IU, s.c.) was administered once there was at least one follicle 18 mm in diameter and two others > or = 16 mm. In all, 119 (100%) and 102 (89%) of the patients respectively in the r-hFSH and u-hFSH HP groups achieved the criteria for HCG. The mean numbers (+/- SD) of oocytes recovered (the primary endpoint) were 12.2 +/- 5.5 and 7.6 +/- 4.4 in the r-hFSH and u-hFSH HP groups respectively (P < 0.0001). However, the number of FSH treatment days (11.0 +/- 1.6 versus 13.5 +/- 3.7) and the number of 75 IU ampoules (21.9 +/- 5.1 versus 31.9 +/- 13.4) used were significantly less (P < 0.0001) in the r-hFSH group than in the u-hFSH HP group. In patients treated using ICSI (63 patients in each group), no difference in oocyte maturation was observed. The mean numbers of embryos obtained were 8.1 +/- 4.2 and 4.7 +/- 3.5 (P < 0.0001), in favour of the r-hFSH group. In the majority of patients (96 and 99% respectively) only one or two embryos were replaced (mean 2.0 +/- 0.2 and 1.9 +/- 0.1 respectively) in the r- hFSH and u-hFSH HP groups. The clinical pregnancy rates per started cycle and per embryo transfer were 45 and 36%, and 48 and 47%, respectively in the r-hFSH and u-hFSH HP groups (not significant). There were six (5.1%) and two (1.7%) cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome respectively. In conclusion, it was found that r-hFSH was more effective than u-hFSH at inducing multiple follicular development. However, the high rate of low ovarian response in the u-hFSH group compared with our general experience was unexpected. The availability of a gonadotrophin with less inter-batch variation would be beneficial for clinicians. r-hFSH seems to fulfil such a requirement.      

Multiple follicular development and ovarian steroidogenesis following subcutaneous administration of a highly purified urinary FSH preparation in pituitary desensitized women undergoing IVF: a multicentre European phase III study

A multicentre, multinational study was carried out between November1990 and February 1992 to assess the safety and efficacy ofa new highly purified urinary human follicle stimulating hormone(FSH; Metrodin HP®) which is practically devoid of luteinizinghormone (LH) activity. Metrodin HP was administered s.c. tostimulate multiple follicular development in women undergoingin-vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer. A total of139 women were recruited from 10 participatin centres. Of these,135 underwent pituitary desensitization with a long gonadotrophin-releasinghormone (GnRH) agonist protocol and following deter-minationof ovarlan inactivity (mean± SD of 12.9 ± 3.2days), Metrodin Hp s.c. stimulation was started; 122 patientswere fully eligible for efficacy analysios and 118 of these(97%) received up to 10 000 IU human chrionic gonadotrophin(HCG) to induce final folicular maturation and timed oocyterecovey. Mean plasma LH concentrations at the beginning of Metro-dinHP treaement were 1.6 ± 0.8 mIU/ml and by the day ofHCG administration were significantly (p<0.001) reduced (1.2±0.8mIU/ml). The mean plasma oestradiol and inhibin concentrationson the day of HCG were 6173±3567 pmol/l and 8.2 ±4.4IU/ml respectively. There was a positive correlation (r= 0.49,p<0.001) between individual oestradiol and inhibin concentrationson the day of HCG. In the 118 patients who received HCG, themean number of oocytes recovered was 8.4 ± 4.7 followingstimulation with 36 ± 10, 75 IU ampoules of MetrodinHP over 12.2±2.1 days. One-hundred-and-eight patients(89% of 122 eligible) ahd 5.3±3.3 oocyted fertilized,and 105 (86%) had 2.8±1.0 embryos transferred; 28 patients(23% perinitiated cycle) had a clinical pregnancy and subsequently18 of these (15% per initiated cycle) had a live birth. A totalof 135 patients who reveiced Metrodin HP were eligible for safetyanalysis. One patient did not receive HCG because of the riskof developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Sevenpatients (5% of those who received HCG) developed OHSS, onesevere, five moderate and one mild case. Three OHSS patientswere pregnant and hospitalized. The patient with severe OHSSwas found to have an ectopic pregnancy. Local side effects werereported by 24 (18%) patients at the site of s.c injection.The most common compliant was brusing (48.5%). There was nodevelopment of antobodies to FSH. In conclusion Metrodln HP,a urinary gonadotrophin preparation in which>95% of the proteincontent is FSH, was effective in stimulating multiple folliculardevelopment and oestradol synthesis to a similar degree reportedfor other gonadotrophin preparations, even when endogenous LHsecretion was significantly reduced by a GnRH agonist. Thesedata support the concept that only very low concentrations ofLH are required in conjunction with FSH for the stimulationof follicular development and ovarian steroidogenesis. MetrodinHp was well tolerated locvally thus enabling convenient self-adminstrationwithout compromising safety or efficacy     

GnRH agonist (buserelin) or hCG for ovulation induction in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the efficacy of ovarian hyperstimulation protocols employing a GnRH antagonist to prevent a premature LH rise allowing final oocyte maturation and ovulation to be induced by a single bolus of either a GnRH agonist or hCG. METHODS: A total of 122 normogonadotrophic patients following a flexible antagonist protocol was stimulated with recombinant human FSH and prospectively randomized (sealed envelopes) to ovulation induction with a single bolus of either 0.5 mg buserelin s.c. (n = 55) or 10,000 IU of hCG (n = 67). A maximum of two embryos was transferred. Luteal support consisted of micronized progesterone vaginally, 90 mg a day, and estradiol, 4 mg a day per os. RESULTS: Ovulation was induced with GnRH agonist in 55 patients and hCG in 67 patients. Significantly more metaphase II (MII) oocytes were retrieved in the GnRH agonist group (P < 0.02). Significantly higher levels of LH and FSH (P < 0.001) and significantly lower levels of progesterone and estradiol (P < 0.001) were seen in the GnRH agonist group during the luteal phase. The implantation rate, 33/97 versus 3/89 (P < 0.001), clinical pregnancy rate, 36 versus 6% (P = 0.002), and rate of early pregnancy loss, 4% versus 79% (P = 0.005), were significantly in favour of hCG. CONCLUSIONS: Ovulation induction with a GnRH agonist resulted in significantly more MII oocytes. However, a significantly lower implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate in addition to a significantly higher rate of early pregnancy loss was seen in the GnRH agonist group, most probably due to a luteal phase deficiency.     

A prospective,randomized, controlled trial comparing highly purified hMG with recombinant FSH in women undergoing ICSI: ovarian response and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND: To assess the clinical profile and efficacy in assisted reproductive treatment of a new human-derived highly purified (HP) menotropin, we compared HP hMG and recombinant (r) FSHalpha use in ICSI within a prospective, randomized, controlled study. METHODS: 100 infertile women were treated with HP hMG (50 patients) or rFSHalpha (50 patients). All patients received the same daily gonadotrophin dose (150 IU) following GnRH agonist suppression (long regimen) until more than three follicles >17 mm and estradiol (E(2)) levels >600 pg/ml were reached. Patients were monitored with daily LH, FSH, hCG, estradiol (E(2)), progesterone, and testosterone measurements; and alternate day pelvic ultrasound. RESULTS: Treatment duration (11.1 +/- 0.4 versus 12.9 +/- 0.5 days, P < 0.05) and gonadotrophin dose (22.4 +/- 1.0 versus 27.0 +/- 1.5 ampoules, P < 0.05) were lower in the HP hMG group. Conversely, peak pre-ovulatory E(2) (1342 +/- 127 versus 933 +/- 109 pg/ml, P < 0.005); and area under the curve of E(2) (3491 +/- 350 versus 2602 +/- 349 pg/ml.day, P < 0.05), immunoreactive serum FSH (65.9 +/- 2.1 versus 48.8 +/- 1.8 IU/l.day, P < 0.001). and hCG (1.7 +/- 0.3 versus 0.0 +/- 0.0 IU/l/day, P < 0.001) during treatment were higher in the HP hMG group. Cycle cancellation rates, transferred embryo number, pregnancy rates per started cycle (30 versus 28%) and per embryo transfer (35 versus 35%) and miscarriage rates (6 versus 6%) were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: HP hMG treatment was associated with: (i) a more efficient patient response, as reflected by reduced treatment duration and gonadotrophin requirements; (ii) increased serum levels of hCG, E(2), and immunoreactive FSH during treatment; (iii) an ICSI outcome indistinguishable from rFSHalpha.     

Human ovarian steroid secretion in vivo: effects of GnRH agonist versus antagonist (cetrorelix).

BACKGROUND: In order to investigate whether gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists exert a significant effect on steroid secretion in vivo compared with GnRH agonists, concentrations of sex steroid hormones (oestradiol, progesterone and testosterone) were studied in follicular fluid from women undergoing ovarian stimulation and treated with either GnRH agonist or antagonist. In addition, the correlation between follicular fluid steroid hormone concentrations and variables of follicular and oocyte development was evaluated. METHODS: Microparticle enzyme immunoassay and radioimmunoassays were used. RESULTS: The mean (SEM) follicular fluid oestradiol concentration was significantly lower in patients treated with GnRH antagonist than in those treated with GnRH agonist (542.0 +/- 76.9 versus 873.0 +/- 105.1 pg/ml, P = 0.02), which correlates with the mean serum oestradiol concentrations found in these two groups. No significant differences were found between groups in follicular fluid progesterone concentrations. Women undergoing GnRH antagonist treatment showed similar concentrations of follicular fluid testosterone compared with GnRH agonist-treated women (14.8 +/- 1.1 versus 13.3 +/- 2.7 ng/ml). The oestradiol:testosterone ratio was markedly reduced in women treated with GnRH antagonist (49.1 +/- 2.3 versus 60.1 +/- 4.4, P = 0.04). In contrast, no differences were found either in the progesterone:testosterone ratio, or in the oestradiol:progesterone ratio. CONCLUSIONS: GnRH antagonist therapy in women undergoing ovarian stimulation had a significant effect on ovarian follicular steroidogenesis.     

Initiation of GnRH antagonist on Day 1 of stimulation as compared to the long agonist protocol in PCOS patients. A randomized controlled trial: effect on hormonal levels and follicular development

BACKGROUND The optimal time for GnRH antagonist initiation is still debatable. The purpose of the current randomized controlled trial is to provide endocrine and follicular data during ovarian stimulation for IVF in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) treated either with a long GnRH agonist scheme or a fixed day-1 GnRH antagonist protocol. METHODS Randomized patients in both groups (antagonist: n = 26; long agonist: n = 52) received oral contraceptive pill treatment for three weeks and a starting dose of 150 IU of follitropin beta. The primary outcome was E(2) level on Day 5 of stimulation, while secondary outcomes were follicular development, LH during ovarian stimulation and progesterone levels. RESULTS Significantly more follicles on days 5, 7 and 8 of stimulation, significantly higher estradiol (E(2)) levels on days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 and significantly higher progesterone levels on days 1, 5 and 8 of stimulation were observed in the antagonist when compared with the agonist group. E(2) was approximately twice as high in the antagonist when compared with the agonist group on day 5 of stimulation (432 versus 204 pg ml(-1), P lt; 0.001). These differences were accompanied by significantly lower LH levels on days 3 and 5 and significantly higher LH levels on days 1, 7 and 8 of stimulation in the antagonist when compared with the agonist group. CONCLUSIONS In PCOS patients undergoing IVF, initiation of GnRH antagonist concomitantly with recombinant FSH is associated with an earlier follicular growth and a different hormonal environment during the follicular phase when compared with the long agonist protocol.     

Ovarian cyst formation following GnRH agonist administration in IVF cycles: incidence and impact

BACKGROUND: The formation of functional ovarian cysts has been recognized as one of the side effects of GnRH agonist administration. The formation of cysts during IVF treatment may be of no clinical significance or may negatively influence its outcome. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of ovarian cyst formation following GnRH agonist administration and to examine their effect on IVF outcome. METHODS: A prospective study of 1317 IVF patients who developed one or more functional ovarian cysts of >or=15 mm following GnRH agonist treatment was performed. Transvaginal ultrasonographic-guided cyst aspiration was carried out in 76 randomly allocated patients out of 122 patients who were found to have functional ovarian cysts before starting ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins. RESULTS: The incidence of follicular cyst formation was 9.3%. Cyst cycles in comparison with non-cyst cycles had significantly elevated day 3 basal FSH (mean+/-SD of 8.3+/-3.2 versus 5.3+/-2.6 mIU/ml, P<0.05) and required more ampoules of gonadotropins (46.3+/-16.5 versus 35+/-14.6, P<0.01). Furthermore, they showed a statistically significant decrease in the quality and number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, number and quality of embryos, implantation and pregnancy rates, with a significant increase in cancellation and abortion rates. Patients with bilateral cysts had a significantly lower number of oocytes and embryos retrieved, with a lower proportion of metaphase II oocytes. They also had a higher proportion of poor quality embryos. Cyst aspiration was not associated with a significant difference in the above parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of cyst formation during GnRH agonist treatment is lower than previously reported. In such cases, the quality of oocytes and embryos were significantly compromised, with a significant increase in the cycle cancellation rate and a decrease in the implantation and pregnancy rates. Neither conservative management nor cyst aspiration improved the IVF outcome.     

Simplification of IVF: minimal monitoring and the use of subcutaneous highly purified FSH administration for ovulation induction

During the past few years much effort has been put into simplifyingthe clinical management of in-vitro fertilization/embryo transfercycles. One important step was the introduction of transvaginalultrasound-guided oocyte collection, as previously described.This study describes further simplifications of the clinicalmanagement of ovarian stimulation. During the period 1st January1991 to 31st August 1993, three major simplification steps wereintroduced. All cycles were down-regulated with a gonadotrophin-releasinghormone (GnRH) agonist according to along protocol permittingfairly precise programming of the oocyte collection. Duringperiod I (n = 329 cycles), closer monitoring by several pelvicultrasound scans and serum oestradiol was used for monitoringthe ovarian stimulation. During period II (n = 230 cycles),only one ultrasound scan was used for monitoring the ovariancycle; oocyte collections during weekends were avoided. Duringperiod III (n = 386 cycles), further simplification of the clinicalmanagement was introduced by using a highly purified folliclestimulating hormone (FSH) (Fertinorm/Metrodin HP), which wasself-administered s.c. for ovarian stimulation. The take-homebaby rates per started cycle for periods I, II and III were16.4, 32.6 and 31.3% respectively. These figures indicate thatwhen using long down-regulation with a GnRH agonist, simplificationof the monitoring of the ovarian stimulation is possible withoutdecreasing the pregnancy rate. Furthermore, the use of a highlypurified FSH, self-administered s.c., greatly simplified treatmentwithout compromising cycle outcome or increasing the risk ofdeveloping an ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.     

Effect of reduced dose of triptorelin at the start of ovarian stimulation on the outcome of IVF: a randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Partial pituitary desensitization using gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists may be sufficient in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for assisted reproduction. However, the minimal effective agonist dose remains to be determined. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of a reduced daily dose of triptorelin, administered at the start of ovarian stimulation, on the results of IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. METHODS: A total of 132 patients was randomized in two groups. Pituitary desensitization was obtained in group 1 (66 patients) with a single 3.75 mg injection (i.m.) of triptorelin. In group 2, 66 patients received 100 microg triptorelin daily, which was then reduced to 50 microg at the start of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) stimulation. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in terms of pregnancy rate per transfer (38% in group 1 versus 34.9% in group 2), implantation rate (20.2 versus 18%) and abortion rate (8.3 versus 9.1%). The number of FSH ampoules used, as well as the number of days stimulation required, was significantly reduced in group 2 (41 +/- 26 versus 46.6 +/- 25.3, P < 0.03 and 11 +/- 1.3 versus 11.8 +/- 1.5, P < 0.002 respectively). No significant differences were seen in oestradiol concentrations and in follicle number, in the quantity of oocytes collected and fertilized, or in the number of embryos obtained or transferred. CONCLUSION: A reduced dose of triptorelin is enough for pituitary suppression during ovarian stimulation but provides no significant improvement in IVF cycle outcome when compared with depot formulation. The possibility of a shorter treatment protocol requiring lower amounts of gonadotrophins should be considered in view of its economic advantage.     

A comparative randomized trial to assess the impact of oral contraceptive pretreatment on follicular growth and hormone profiles in GnRH antagonist-treated patients

BACKGROUND: This randomized controlled trial was designed to assess the impact of oral contraceptive (OC) scheduling with a GnRH antagonist (ganirelix) regimen on the ovarian response of women undergoing recombinant FSH (rFSH) stimulation for IVF, compared with a non-scheduled ganirelix regimen and a long GnRH agonist (nafarelin) protocol. METHODS: A total of 110 women was treated with an OC and ganirelix, 111 with ganirelix alone and 111 with nafarelin. The OC (containing 30 microg ethinylestradiol/150 microg desogestrel) was taken for 14-28 days and stopped 2 days prior to the start of rFSH treatment. Primary efficiency parameters were the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes (per attempt) and the number of grade 1 or 2 embryos (per attempt). RESULTS: In terms of follicular growth and hormone profiles, the OC-scheduled antagonist regimen mimicked the agonist regimen rather than the (non-scheduled) GnRH antagonist regimen. In the OC-scheduled GnRH antagonist group and the nafarelin group (versus the non-scheduled antagonist group), pituitary suppression was more profound at the start of stimulation (P < or = 0.001), there was a slower start of follicular growth (P < or = 0.001), longer stimulation was required (11.7 and 10.3 days respectively versus 9.4; P < or = 0.001), and more rFSH was used (2667 and 2222 IU versus 1966 IU; P < or = 0.001). In the three groups, the number of oocytes was similar (13.1, 12.9 and 11.5 respectively; not significant) as well as the number of good quality embryos (5.1, 5.7 and 5.0 respectively; not significant). CONCLUSION: OC treatment prior to the rFSH/ganirelix regimen can be successfully applied to schedule patients, although more days of stimulation and more rFSH are required than with a non-scheduled GnRH antagonist regimen.     

Comparison of the GnRH agonist and antagonist protocol on the same patients in assisted reproduction during controlled ovarian stimulation cycles

Despite the fact that both gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and antagonist protocol are effective in suppressing the incidence of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges through reversibly blocking the secretion of pituitary gonadotropins, the exact impact of these two distinctive protocols on the clinical setting of patients for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatment, however, remained controversial. We thus in the present report conducted a retrospective study to compare the impact of GnRH agonist and antagonist protocol on the same patients during controlled ovarian stimulation cycles. A total of 81 patients undergoing 105 agonist and 88 antagonist protocol were analyzed. We failed to detect a significant difference between two protocols for the difference in duration of ovarian stimulation, number of recombinant FSH (Gonal-F) ampoules used, number of oocytes retrieved, serum levels for estradiol (E2) and progestone (P), thickness of endometrium, and the zygote- and blastocyst-development rate. It is seemly that high quality embryo rate was higher in the antagonist protocol, but the data did not reach a statistical significance. Nevertheless, Implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate were significantly higher in the antagonist protocol (10.64% and 30.26%, respectively) than that of the agonist protocol (5.26% and 15.82%, respectively). Our data also suggest that the GnRH antagonist protocol is likely to have the advantage for improving the outcome of pregnancy in those patients with a history of multiple failures for the IVF-ET treatment.     

A prospective, randomized comparison of two starting doses of recombinant FSH in combination with cetrorelix in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI

BACKGROUND: A prospective randomized study was carried out in two centres to compare the number of oocytes retrieved after two different starting doses of recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) (Gonal-F) in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles using the multiple dose regimen of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cetrorelix (Cetrotide) to prevent induction of the premature LH surge. METHODS: Sixty women were randomized to receive rhFSH 150 IU ('low'), and 60 women to receive rhFSH 225 IU ('high') as the starting dose for the first 5 days of stimulation. From stimulation day 6 and onwards, including the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration, the women received 0.25 mg of cetrorelix as a daily dose. The primary endpoint was the number of oocytes retrieved. RESULTS: The mean number (+/- SD) of oocytes was 9.1 +/- 4.4 and 11.0 +/- 4.6 in the 'low' and 'high' groups respectively (P = 0.024). The mean number of 75 IU ampoules of rhFSH was significantly lower in the 'low' group (23.0 +/- 6.3 versus 30.5 +/- 5.6, P < 0.0001). The ongoing pregnancy rate per started cycle and per embryo transfer were 25.9 and 28.8% versus 25.4 and 26.8% respectively in the 'low' and 'high' rhFSH groups (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: When using a starting dose of 225 IU rhFSH combined with the multiple dose of 0.25 mg cetrorelix from stimulation day 6, significantly more oocytes were obtained than with a starting dose of 150 IU rhFSH.     

Adjuvant L-arginine treatment in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a double-blind, randomized study

BACKGROUND: Enhanced vascularization appears to be important for follicular selection and maturation in both spontaneous and stimulated IVF cycles. Nitric oxide, formed in vivo from L-arginine, may play a key role in follicular maturation and ovulation. METHODS: To evaluate the role of L-arginine supplementation in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, 37 IVF patients were divided into two groups according to ovarian stimulation protocols: group I, GnRH agonist plus pure (p)FSH plus oral L-arginine (n = 18); and group II, GnRH agonist plus pFSH plus placebo (n = 19). Hormonal, ultrasonographic and Doppler evaluations were performed, and plasma and follicular fluid nitrite/nitrate concentrations were monitored. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients completed the study. In group I (n = 16), plasma L-arginine concentrations increased from (basal) 87 +/- 12 micromol to 279 +/- 31 micromol (P = 0.002) on the day of beta-HCG administration. In this group, pFSH treatment was shorter (P = 0.039) than in group II (n = 16). The number of the follicles > or =17mm was lower (P = 0.038) in group I than group II. The "good quality" embryos were fewer in number (P = 0.034) and pregnancy rate, both per patient (P = 0.024) and per embryo transfer (P = 0.019), was lower in group I. In the L-arginine group, an increased follicular fluid concentration of nitrite/nitrate was observed. On day 8 of the cycle, elevated plasma estradiol levels were associated with decreased blood flow resistances of perifollicular arteries. Follicular fluid concentrations of nitrite/nitrate were inversely correlated with embryo quality (r = -0.613; P = 0.005) and perifollicular artery pulsatility index (r = -0.609; P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: L-Arginine supplementation may be detrimental to embryo quality and pregnancy rate during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles.     

Inhibin A and inhibin B reflect ovarian function in assisted reproduction but are less useful at predicting outcome

To test the hypothesis that dimeric inhibin A and/or inhibin B concentrations represent improved markers of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome over follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), 78 women who achieved pregnancy within three assisted reproduction treatment cycles were matched to 78 women who underwent at least three assisted reproductive treatment cycles and failed to achieve pregnancy. Baseline serum inhibin B and FSH were obtained between days 1 and 4 in a cycle prior to ovarian stimulation, and inhibin A and B were measured immediately before the ovulatory stimulus and in follicular fluid from the lead follicle. Comparing pregnant and non-pregnant subjects at baseline, younger age (34.0 +/- 0.5 versus 36.0 +/- 0.5 years; P < 0.003) and a combination of FSH lower than the median value (11.2 IU/l) and inhibin B higher than the median value (76.5 pg/ml) were associated with pregnancy (P < 0.03), but FSH (11.7 +/- 0.5 versus 12.9 +/- 0.9 IU/ml) and inhibin B (89.0 +/- 10.2 versus 79.7 +/- 7.7 pg/ml) were not independently associated. At the time of the ovulatory stimulus, serum inhibin A (52.8 +/- 3.8 versus 40.0 +/- 2.7 IU/ml; P < 0.004), inhibin B (1623.8 +/- 165.1 versus 859.2 +/- 94.8 pg/ml; P < 0.0009) and the number of oocytes retrieved (14.6 +/- 0.8 versus 10.1 +/- 0.6; P < 0.0001) were predictive of pregnancy when controlled for age. Inhibin A was correlated with the number of embryos (r = 0.4; P < 0.0001). However, neither inhibin A nor inhibin B provided additional information in predicting successful outcome over age and number of oocytes. We conclude that: (i) in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology, age and number of oocytes retrieved are the strongest predictors of success; (ii) of the parameters available prior to cycle initiation, a combination of lower FSH and higher inhibin B was associated with a greater chance for a successful outcome but an absolute cut-off could not be defined; and (iii) during ovarian stimulation, higher concentrations of inhibin A and inhibin B in serum are associated with successful IVF and mark ovarian reserve as a measure of oocyte number and quality.     

Women with poor response to IVF have lowered circulating gonadotrophin surge-attenuating factor (GnSAF) bioactivity during spontaneous and stimulated cycles

BACKGROUND: Up to 13% of IVF cancellations are due to poor responses during down-regulated cycles. Because premature luteinization occurs more frequently in older or "poor responder" patients, defective production of gonadotrophin surge-attenuating factor (GnSAF) may be involved. METHODS: Nine women with normal previous IVF response (NORM) and 9 with previous poor IVF response (POOR) were monitored in a spontaneous cycle (blood samples: days 2, 7, 11, 15 and 20) and then stimulated with recombinant human FSH (rFSH) under GnRH agonist (blood samples: treatment days GnRH agonist + 2, GnRH agonist + 7, day of HCG administration and days HCG + 1 and HCG + 8). LH, FSH, estradiol, progesterone and inhibin-A and -B were assayed in individual samples while GnSAF bioactivity was determined in samples pooled according to day, cycle and IVF response. RESULTS: During spontaneous cycles LH, steroids and inhibins were similar between NORM and POOR women, FSH was elevated in POOR women (4.9 +/- 0.3 versus 6.7 +/- 0.6 mIU/l, P < 0.01) and GnSAF bioactivity was detectable on days 2, 7 and 11 in NORM women only. During IVF cycles inhibin-A and -B rose more markedly in NORM than POOR women. Similarly GnSAF production peaked on day GnRH agonist + 7 in NORM women, but on the day of HCG administration in POOR women. CONCLUSIONS: Defects in ovarian responsiveness to FSH include reduced GnSAF production. This suggests that GnSAF should be investigated as a marker of ovarian reserve once an immunoassay becomes available.     

Luteinizing hormone response to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone in normal women undergoing ovulation induction with urinary or recombinant follicle stimulating hormone

Oestradiol enhances pituitary sensitivity to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in normal women, while in women undergoing ovulation induction the putative factor gonadotrophin surge attenuating factor (GnSAF) attenuates the response of luteinizing hormone (LH) to GnRH. To study the relationships between oestradiol and GnSAF during ovulation induction, 15 normally ovulating women were investigated in an untreated spontaneous cycle (control, first cycle), in a cycle treated with daily i.m. injections of 225 IU urinary follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (Metrodin HP, uFSH cycle) and in a cycle treated with daily s.c. injections of 225 IU recombinant FSH (Gonal-F, rFSH cycle). Treatment with FSH started on cycle day 2. The women during the second and third cycle were allocated to the two treatments in an alternate way. One woman who became pregnant during the first treatment cycle (rFSH) was excluded from the study. In all cycles, an i.v. injection of 10 microg GnRH was given to the women (n = 14) daily from days 2-7 as well as from the day on which the leading follicle was 14 mm in diameter (day V) until mid-cycle (n = 7). The response of LH to GnRH at 30 min (deltaLH), representing pituitary sensitivity, was calculated. In the spontaneous (control) cycles, deltaLH values increased significantly only during the late follicular phase, i.e. from day V to mid-cycle, at which time they were correlated significantly with serum oestradiol values (r = 0.554, P < 0.01). Initially during the early follicular phase in the uFSH and the rFSH cycles, deltaLH values showed a significant decline which was not related to oestradiol (increased GnSAF bioactivity). Then, deltaLH values increased significantly on cycle day 7 and further on day v with no change thereafter up to mid- cycle. On these two days, deltaLH values were correlated significantly with serum oestradiol values (r = 0.587 and r = 0.652 respectively, P < 0.05). During the pre-ovulatory period, deltaLH values in the FSH cycles were significantly lower than in the spontaneous cycles. Significantly higher serum FSH values were achieved during treatment with uFSH than rFSH. However, serum values of oestradiol, immunoreactive inhibin, and deltaLH as well as the number of follicles > or = 12 mm in diameter did not differ significantly between the two FSH preparations. These results suggest that in women undergoing ovulation induction with FSH, oestradiol enhances pituitary sensitivity to GnRH, while GnSAF exerts antagonistic effects. The rFSH used in this study (Gonal-F) was at least as effective as the uFSH preparation (Metrodin-HP) in inducing multiple follicular maturation in normally cycling women.      

Half-dose depot triptorelin in pituitary suppression for multiple ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction technology: a randomized study

BACKGROUND: Pituitary suppression by depot GnRH agonist may be excessive for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction technology. This study compares the efficacy of standard and half-dose depot triptorelin in a long protocol. METHODS: A total of 180 patients were randomized into two groups using sealed envelopes. Pituitary desensitization was obtained in group 1 (90 patients) with half-dose (1.87 mg) triptorelin depot in the mid-luteal phase of their menstrual cycle, and in group 2 (90 patients) with full-dose (3.75 mg) triptorelin. RESULTS: There was no premature LH surge, with LH levels being lower in the full-dose group (1.04+/-0.05 versus 0.7+/-0.06 IU/l on the day of hCG). The number of FSH ampoules used was lower in group 1 (42+/-2 versus 59+/-3). The numbers of mature oocytes (10.1+/-0.54 versus 7.4+/-0.55), of fertilized oocytes (8.24+/-0.35 versus 6.34+/-0.37) and of embryos (7.8+/-0.36 versus 5.9+/-0.37) were significantly higher in group 1. No significant differences were found in pregnancy (38.8 versus 25.3%), implantation (22.6 versus 13.8%) or abortion (6.1 versus 5.0%) rates. Cumulative pregnancy (fresh plus frozen embryo transfers: 56.8 versus 35.4%) rate was significantly higher in group 1. CONCLUSION: A half-dose of depot triptorelin can be successfully used in ovarian stimulation for IVF and produce a higher number of good quality embryos with a good chance of implantation.     

Cost-effectiveness of aromatase inhibitor co-treatment for controlled ovarian stimulation

BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical results and the cost-effectiveness of using the aromatase inhibitor, letrozole, in conjunction with FSH and FSH alone for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in patients undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI) for a variety of indications. METHODS: Four hundred and thirty-two consecutive patients who underwent 872 IUI cycles were included. The study population was composed of two groups. Group I included 308 patients who underwent 589 IUI cycles with letrozole and FSH for the following indications: anovulation (143 cycles), male factor infertility (147 cycles), unexplained infertility (250 cycles), endometriosis (18 cycles) and combined indications (31 cycles). Group II included 124 patients who underwent 283 IUI cycles who received FSH only for the following indications: ovarian factor infertility (82 cycles), male factor infertility (66 cycles), unexplained infertility (114 cycles), endometriosis (13 cycles) and other indications (8 cycles). Main outcome measures included number of mature follicles >16 mm in diameter, dose of FSH used per cycle, clinical pregnancy rate and cost-effectiveness ratio per pregnancy. RESULTS: FSH dose required for ovarian stimulation was significantly lower when letrozole was used (P < 0.0001). Although a significantly higher number of follicles >16 mm and endometrial thickness at the day of hCG administration (P < 0.0001) were observed in Group II, pregnancy rate per started (14.4 versus 15.9%) and per completed cycles (15.77 versus 18.07%) was the same in Group I and Group II, respectively. IUI cancellation rate was significantly lower with letrozole treatment (P = 0.05%). The cost per cycle was significantly lower in Group I versus Group II (468.93 Can dollars +/- 418.18 versus 1067.28 +/- 921.43; P < 0.0001). The cost-effectiveness ratio was 3249.42 dollars in the letrozole group and 6712.00 dollars in the FSH-only group. CONCLUSION: A letrozole-FSH combination could be an effective ovarian stimulation protocol in IUI cycles. Such a protocol may be more cost-effective than FSH alone because of the difference of FSH dose and cost. A randomized controlled trial is needed to further substantiate this finding.     

Increased risk of early pregnancy loss by profound suppression of luteinizing hormone during ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction

The impact of suppressed concentrations of circulating luteinizing hormone (LH) during ovarian stimulation on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment in 200 consecutive, normogonadotrophic women (couples) was analysed retrospectively. A standard stimulation protocol with mid-luteal gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist down-regulation and ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) was used in all cases. Blood was sampled from each woman on stimulation days 1 and 8 for analysis of oestradiol and LH in serum. A threshold value of serum LH of 0.5 IU/l on stimulation day 8 (S8) was chosen to discriminate between women with low or 'normal' LH concentrations. Low concentrations of LH on S8 (<0.5 IU/l) were found in 49% (98/200) of the women. This group of women was comparable with the normal LH group with regard to pre-treatment clinical parameters, and to the parameters characterizing the stimulation protocol with the exception of serum oestradiol concentration, which on S8 was significantly lower than in the normal LH group (P < 0.001). The proportion of positive pregnancy tests was similar in the two groups (30% versus 34% per started cycle), but the final clinical treatment outcome was significantly different, with a five-fold higher risk of early pregnancy loss (45% versus 9%; P < 0.005) in the low LH group and consequently a significantly poorer chance of delivery than in the normal LH group. It is concluded that a substantial proportion of normogonadotrophic women treated with GnRH agonist down-regulation in combination with FSH, devoid of LH activity, experience LH suppression, which compromises the treatment outcome. Whether these women would benefit from supplementation with recombinant LH or human menopausal gonadotrophin during ovarian stimulation, remains to be proven in the future by prospective randomized trials.