Promises and obstacles for the blockade of CD40-CD40L interactions in allotransplantation

Although clinical trials using anti-CD40L mAb have been halted, blockade of CD40-CD40L interactions has given promising results in rodent and nonhuman primate models. Recently, new insights into the consequences of blocking CD40-CD40L interactions have led to the possibility of overcoming the thromboembolic complications previously associated with this strategy and may pave the way for successful tolerance induction. This mini review will address the issues relating to CD40-CD40L blockade in allotransplantation.     

Treatment with humanized monoclonal antibodies against CD80 and CD86 combined with sirolimus prolongs renal allograft survival in cynomolgus monkeys

BACKGROUND: Co-stimulatory blockade has been shown to prolong allograft survival in different transplant models. We investigated the effect of combining humanized anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) with sirolimus in cynomolgus monkey renal transplant recipients. METHODS: After renal transplantation, groups of four animals were treated daily with sirolimus, sirolimus and nine weekly doses of mAb, two weekly doses of mAb, or sirolimus and two weekly doses of mAb. RESULTS: Survival was significantly better in monkeys treated with the combination of sirolimus and mAb when compared with treatment with either agent alone (P=0.0067 by log-rank analysis). When combined with sirolimus, nine weekly doses of mAb did not result in an additional survival benefit compared with only two mAb doses (P=0.74). None of the treatment regimens used in this study resulted in development of transplantation tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus can be successfully combined with humanized mAb against CD80 and CD86. Induction with a short course of mAb is effective in prolonging allograft survival in combination with sirolimus.     

CD2 is a Dominant Target for Allogeneic Responses

CD2 and 2B4 (CD244) are members of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily and are both ligands for another family member, CD48. CD2 is widely distributed on T, NK, and B cells and some antigen-presenting cells, while 2B4 is expressed on NK and some T cells and monocytes and is known to participate in NK cytotoxicity. Since indefinite allograft survival could be obtained by a combination of anti-CD48 plus anti-CD2 mAb administration, it was important to determine the role of 2B4 blockade in allograft rejection. MAbs directed against CD2, CD48, or 2B4 were administered singly or in pairs to cardiac allograft recipients. The experiments show that only anti-CD2 plus anti-CD48 mAbs result in indefinite allograft survival, while anti-CD2 plus anti-2B4 mAbs substantially prolong graft survival, and anti-CD48 plus anti-2B4 mAbs were no better than each mAb alone. The effect of these mAbs on anti-CD3 mAb and alloantigen-driven proliferation and IFN-gamma production were also assessed. In general, anti-CD2 inhibited both anti-CD3 mAb and alloantigen-driven responses, while anti-CD48 inhibited only anti-CD3 mAb but not alloantigen-driven proliferative and cytokine responses. Anti-2B4 mAbs were generally ineffective alone. Combinations of mAbs were more effective than single mAbs only in alloantigen-driven proliferation, commensurate with allograft survival results. Using CD2-/- and CD48-/- T cells and antigen-presenting cells, we also demonstrate that these inhibitory mAbs act primarily by blocking intercellular interactions, rather than directly delivering negative signals to T cells. These results suggest that, unlike CD2, 2B4 is not a potent regulatory molecule or ligand for CD48 in the response to alloantigen. Blocking the 2B4-CD48 receptor-ligand pair does not inhibit T-cell responses and alloreactivity to the same degree as CD2-CD48 blockade.     

Costimulation and Autoimmune Diabetes in BB Rats

Costimulatory signals regulate T-cell activation. To investigate the role of costimulation in autoimmunity and transplantation, we studied the BB rat model of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes-prone BB (BBDP) rats spontaneously develop disease when 55–120 days of age. We observed that two anti-CD28 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) with different functional activities completely prevented diabetes in BBDP rats. Anti-CD154 mAb delayed diabetes, whereas treatment with CTLA4-Ig or anti-CD80 mAb accelerated disease. Anti-CD86 or anti-CD134L mAbs had no effect. Diabetes resistant BB (BBDR) rats are disease-free, but >95% of them develop diabetes after treatment with polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid and an mAb that depletes Treg cells. In the induced BBDR model, anti-CD154 mAb delayed onset of diabetes, whereas CTLA4-Ig, anti-CD134L or either of the anti-CD28 mAbs had little or no effect. In contrast, blockade of the CD134-CD134L pathway was highly effective for preventing autoimmune recurrence against syngeneic islet grafts in diabetic BBDR hosts. Blockade of the CD40-CD154 pathway was also effective, but less so. These data suggest that the effectiveness of costimulation blockade in the treatment of type 1 diabetes is dependent on both the costimulatory pathway targeted and the mechanism of induction, stage, intensity and duration of the pathogenic process.     

Normal Donor Bone Marrow is Superior to Flt3 Ligand-Mobilized Bone Marrow in Prolonging Heart Allograft Survival when Combined with Anti-CD40L (CD154)

Flt3 ligand (FL) administration markedly increases bone marrow (BM) stem cells and immature dendritic cells. We investigated the influence of CD40-CD40Ligand (CD154) pathway blockade on antidonor immunity, cytokine production, microchimerism and heart graft survival in BALB/c (H2d) recipients of fully allogeneic C57BL/10 (H2b) FL-mobilized BM (FL-BM) or normal BM. Anti-CD40L mAb strongly suppressed anti-donor T-cell proliferative responses in recipients of either normal or FL-BM, but was less efficient in inhibiting antidonor cytolytic T-cell (CTL) activity, especially in recipients of FL-BM. Interestingly, CD40L blockade was more effective in recipients of multiple compared with single donor BM infusions. Anti-donor cytokine responses revealed complete impairment of IFN-gamma, IL-4 and IL-10 production in recipients of normal BM and CD40L mAb. By contrast, and in agreement with the CTL data, mice given FL-BM retained ability to produce IFN-gamma CD40-CD40L blockade did not promote microchimerism, as evidenced by immunohistology and real time polymerase chain reaction. Nevertheless, anti-CD40L mAb enhanced heart allograft survival in recipients of FL-BM, but the effect was inferior to that achieved with normal BM. These data provide insight into the influence of growth factor-expanded donor BM and costimulation blockade on antidonor immune reactivity and transplant outcome. The comparatively poor outcome obtained using FL-BM plus anti-CD40L mAb in this model may be ascribed to the failure of effectively interdicting antidonor CTL activity.     

Mechanisms Involved in the Establishment of Tolerance Through Costimulatory Blockade and BMT: Lack of Requirement for CD40L-Mediated Signaling for Tolerance or Deletion of Donor-reactive CD4+ Cells

We have previously shown that high levels of multiline-age mixed hematopoietic chimerism and systemic T-cell tolerance can be achieved in mice without myeloablation through the use of anti-CD40L and costimulatory blockade alone (plus CTLA4Ig) or with recipient CD8 depletion and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Chimeric mice permanently accept donor skin grafts (> 100 days), and rapidly reject third-party grafts. The mechanisms by which costimulatory blockade facilitates the engraftment of allogeneic hematopoietic cells have not been defined. To further understand the in vivo mechanisms by which the administration of anti-CD40L mAb facilitates the engraftment of donor bone marrow and rapidly tolerizes CD4+ T cells, we analyzed the establishment of chimerism and tolerance in CD40L -/- mice. We demonstrate here that anti-CD40L mAb treatment is required only to prevent CD40L/CD40 interactions, and that no signal to the T cell through CD40L is necessary for the induction of CD4+ tolerance. Peripheral deletion of donor-reactive CD4+ T cells occurs rapidly in CD40L -/- mice receiving bone marrow transplantation (BMT), indicating that this deletion in the presence of anti-CD40L is not due to targeting of activated CD4+ cells by the antibody. Complete CD4+ cell tolerance is observed by both skin graft acceptance and in vitro assays before deletion is complete, indicating that additional mechanisms play a role in inducing CD4+ T-cell tolerance as the result of BMT in the presence of CD40/CD40L blockade.     

CD45RB-targeting strategies for promoting long-term allograft survival and preventingchronic allograft vasculopathy

BACKGROUND: CD45RB is a potent immunomodulatory target to achieve long-term allograft survival. We evaluated the in vivo effect of anti-CD45RB monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment in combination with conventional immunosuppression or costimulatory blockade strategies as a therapeutic modality for future clinical application. METHODS: A fully MHC-mismatched vascularized mouse cardiac allograft model was used to test the interactions between anti-CD45RB mAb and conventional immunosuppressive drugs or costimulatory blockade of the CD40/CD154 or B7/CD28 pathway. Chronic rejection was examined histologically for development of chronic allograft vasculopathy. RESULTS: Cyclosporine significantly abrogated the effect of anti-CD45RB therapy. In contrast, rapamycin acted synergistically with anti-CD45RB mAb in promoting long-term allograft survival. CD154 blockade further enhanced the tolerogenic efficacy of anti-CD45RB mAb. These synergistic effects of combination treatments also prevented the development of chronic allograft vasculopathy. CONCLUSION: CD45RB-targeting strategy in combination with the use of rapamycin or costimulatory blockade promotes allograft tolerance and prevents chronic rejection.     

Prevention of kidney allograft rejection using anti-CD40 and anti-CD86 in primates

BACKGROUND: Costimulation blockade has been proposed to induce allograft tolerance. We combined an antagonist anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody (mAb) with an antagonist anti-CD86 mAb in a rhesus monkey kidney allograft model. We chose this combination because it leaves CD80-CD152 signaling unimpaired, allowing for the down-regulatory effect of CD152 signaling to take place through this pathway. METHODS: Rhesus monkeys underwent transplantation with a major histocompatibility complex-mismatched kidney. One group of animals received anti-CD40 alone, and a second group received the combination of anti-CD40 and anti-CD86, twice weekly for 56 days. RESULTS: Three animals with low levels of anti-CD40 rejected the transplanted kidney while still receiving treatment. Three animals with high levels of anti-CD40 rejected at days 91, 134, and 217 with signs of chronic rejection. Animals treated with the combination of anti-CD40 and anti-CD86 mAbs rejected their kidneys at days 61, 75, and 78, shortly after cessation of treatment. Two animals were killed on days 71 and 116 with a blocked ureter. These animals developed virtually no signs of tubulitis or infiltration during treatment and no donor-specific alloantibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Both treatment protocols prevented rejection for the duration of the treatment in most animals. Blocking costimulation by anti-CD40 or by anti-CD40 plus anti-CD86 may be an effective method to prevent graft rejection and may obviate the need for other immunosuppressive drugs, especially in the immediate posttransplantation period.     

4-1BB promotes long-term survival in skin allografts treated with anti-CD45RB and anti-CD40L monoclonal antibodies

4-1BB (CD137) is a T-cell co-stimulatory molecule that promotes T cell activation. Using a skin transplantation model, we observed that simultaneous administration of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) targeting CD45RB and CD40L prolonged skin allograft in co-stimulation blockade (CTLA4-Ig and anti-CD40L mAb)-resistant mice, because of reducing CD8(+) T cells and CD4(+) CD45RB(high) T cells. Anti-CD45RB mAb (45RB) blocks the activation of T helper 1 (Th1) cells and generates regulatory T cells (T(reg)). The experimental design included five groups: group 1, control; group 2, 45RB-MR1; group 3, 45B-MR1 + 4-IBBL; group 4, anti-CD4 mAb plus group 3 treatment; group 5, anti-CD8 mAb plus group 3 treatment. In this study we highlight the involvement of 4-1BB/4-1BBL in the development of T-cell responses. C57BL/6 recipients of BALB/c skin grafts were treated with 45RB, anti-CD40L mAb (MR1), and antagonistic anti-4-1BBL mAb (4-1BBL) on days 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 posttransplantation. Additional 4-1BBL further prolonged skin graft survival, although the percentage of splenocyte-derived CD8(+) T cells was reduced similarly in both groups. Use of 4-1BBL seems to have additive effects on T(reg) cells, which play a major role in the maintenance of tolerance. Even after immunosuppressive therapy in combination with CD4(+) T-cell depletion, we did not achieve prolonged graft survival, possibly because of the absense of T(reg) cells, which require CD4-independent CD8(+) T cells, based on the observation of increasing proportion of CD8(+) T cells in similar degree as the control group.     

Critical Role for CD8+ T Cells in Allograft Acceptance Induced by DST and CD40/CD154 Costimulatory Blockade

Donor-specific transfusion (DST) and CD40/CD154 costimulation blockade is a powerful immunosuppressive strategy which prolongs survival of many allografts. The efficacy of DST and anti-CD154 mAb for prolongation of hepatocellular allograft survival was only realized in C57BL/6 mice that have both CD4- and CD8-dependent pathways available (median survival time, MST, 82 days). Hepatocyte rejection in CD8 KO mice which is CD4-dependent was not suppressed by DST and anti-CD154 mAb treatment (MST, 7 days); unexpectedly DST abrogated the beneficial effects of anti-CD154 mAb for suppression of hepatocyte rejection (MST, 42 days) and on donor-reactive alloantibody production. Hepatocyte rejection in CD4 KO mice which is CD8-dependent was suppressed by treatment with DST and anti-CD154 mAb therapy (MST, 35 days) but did not differ significantly from immunotherapy with anti-CD154 mAb alone (MST, 32 days). Induction of hepatocellular allograft acceptance by DST and anti-CD154 mAb immunotherapy was dependent on host CD8(+) T cells, as demonstrated by CD8 depletion studies in C57BL/6 mice (MST, 14 days) and CD8 reconstitution of CD8 KO mice (MST, 56 days). These studies demonstrate that both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell subsets contribute to induction of hepatocellular allograft acceptance by this immunotherapeutic strategy.     

Operational tolerance induced by pretreatment with donor dendritic cells under blockade of CD40 pathway.

BACKGROUND: Dendritic cells can mount immune response as competent antigen presenting cells. Recently, it has been reported that immature dendritic cells induce prolongation of allograft survival. However, the ability of mature dendritic cells to induce operational tolerance is unclear. Therefore, in this study, we examined the ability of splenic mature dendritic cells to induce operational tolerance to fully allogeneic antigens using mouse heterotopic heart transplantation model. METHODS: CBA (H2k) mice received i.v. injections with donor splenic dendritic cells or B cells in the absence or presence of monoclonal antibody (mAb) specific for CD40 ligand or CD80/CD86 2 weeks before transplantation of a C57BL/10 (H2b) heart. RESULTS: When donor dendritic cells were injected i.v. 2 weeks before transplantation, rejection response was accelerated compared with that of naive mice [median survival time (MST) = 7 and 8 days, respectively]. However, when CD40 pathway was blocked by anti-CD40 ligand mAb, i.v. injection of donor dendritic cells but not B cells induced indefinite graft survival (MST >100 and 20 days, respectively). Mice treated with anti-CD40 ligand mAb alone rejected their grafts with a MST of 18 days. Intravenous injection of donor dendritic cells and B cells in combination with anti-CD80/CD86 mAbs was less effective to induce graft prolongation (MST = 9.5 and 13 days, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, under blockade of CD40 pathway, mature dendritic cells were tolerogens in vivo independent of CD80/86 pathways.     

CD154 Regulates Primate Humoral Immunity to Influenza

Current methods of immunosuppression for the purposes of allowing solid organ transplantation in humans are broadly inhibitory and thus are associated with an increased risk of opportunistic infections and neoplasia. We have shown previously that a selective blockade of CD40-CD154 interactions during heart transplantation in cynomolgus macaques significantly delays immune-mediated graft injury. Here, we determined the effect of anti-CD154 mAb therapy on primate serologic responses to immunization with influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA), a T-cell-dependent Ag. We found that CD154 blockade attenuated primary and secondary serum Ab responses of IgM and IgG isotypes to influenza, even when anti-CD154 treatment was discontinued prior to reimmunization. These findings show that in primates CD40-CD154 interactions are necessary for both primary and secondary Ab responses to viral Ags. Furthermore, the data suggest that viral Ag stimulation of primates in the absence of CD154 stimulation may have a tolerizing effect on that Ag.     

Rat xenograft survival in mice treated with donor-specific transfusion and anti-CD154 antibody is enhanced by elimination of host CD4+ cells

BACKGROUND: Treatment with a donor-specific transfusion (DST) and a brief course of anti-mouse CD154 (anti-CD40-ligand) monoclonal antibody (mAb) prolongs the survival of both allografts and rat xenografts in mice. The mechanism by which allograft survival is prolonged is incompletely understood, but depends in part on the presence of CD4+ cells and the deletion of alloreactive CD8+ T cells. Less is known about the mechanism by which this protocol prolongs xenograft survival. METHODS: We measured rat islet and skin xenograft survival in euthymic and thymectomized mice treated with combinations of DST, anti-CD154 mAb, anti-CD4 mAb, and anti-CD8 mAb. Recipients included C57BL/6, C57BL/6-scid, C57BL/6-CD4null, and C57BL/6-CD8null mice. RESULTS: Pretreatment with a depleting anti-CD4 mAb markedly prolonged the survival of both skin and islet xenografts in mice given DST plus anti-CD154 mAb. Comparable prolongation of xenograft survival was obtained in C57BL/6-CD4null recipients treated with DST and anti-CD154 mAb. In contrast, anti-CD8 mAb did not prolong the survival of either islet or skin xenografts in mice treated with DST and anti-CD154 mAb. Thymectomy did not influence xenograft survival in any treatment group. Adoptive transfer of splenocytes from C57BL/6-CD4null recipients treated with DST and anti-CD154 mAb and bearing long-term skin xenografts revealed the presence of residual xenoreactive cells. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that treatment with DST and anti-CD154 mAb induces a state of "functional" transplantation tolerance. They also support the hypothesis that both the induction and maintenance of graft survival based on this protocol depend on different cellular mechanisms in allogeneic and xenogeneic model systems.     

New insights into the interactions between T-cell costimulatory blockade and conventional immunosuppressive drugs

OBJECTIVE: To determine the precise in vivo interaction between T-cell costimulatory blockade and conventional immunosuppression in transplantation. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Blocking B7 or CD154 T-cell costimulatory activation pathways prevents allograft rejection in small and large animal transplant models and is considered a promising strategy for clinical organ transplantation. METHODS: A fully MHC-mismatched vascularized mouse cardiac allograft model was used to test the interactions between anti-CD154 or CTLA4Ig monotherapy and conventional immunosuppressive drugs in promoting long-term graft acceptance. The frequency of alloreactive T cell was measured by ELISPOT. Chronic rejection was examined by histology. RESULTS: Cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and anti-IL-2R monoclonal antibody therapy abrogated the effect of a single-dose protocol of anti-CD154 therapy. In contrast, rapamycin acted synergistically with anti-CD154 therapy in promoting long-term allograft survival. The addition of calcineurin inhibitors did not abolish this synergistic effect. Intense CD154-CD40 blockade by a multiple-dose schedule of anti-CD154 resulted in long-term graft survival and profound alloreactive T-cell unresponsiveness and overcame the opposite effects of calcineurin inhibitors. CTLA4Ig induced long-term graft survival, and the effect was not affected by the concomitant use of any immunosuppressive drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The widespread view that calcineurin inhibitors abrogate the effects of T-cell costimulatory blockade should be revisited. Sufficient costimulatory blockade and synergy induced by CD154 blockade and rapamycin promote allograft tolerance and prevent chronic rejection.     

CD40 blockade combines with CTLA4Ig and sirolimus to produce mixed chimerism in an MHC-defined rhesus macaque transplant model

In murine models, T-cell costimulation blockade of the CD28:B7 and CD154:CD40 pathways synergistically promotes immune tolerance after transplantation. While CD28 blockade has been successfully translated to the clinic, translation of blockade of the CD154:CD40 pathway has been less successful, in large part due to thromboembolic complications associated with anti-CD154 antibodies. Translation of CD40 blockade has also been slow, in part due to the fact that synergy between CD40 blockade and CD28 blockade had not yet been demonstrated in either primate models or humans. Here we show that a novel, nondepleting CD40 monoclonal antibody, 3A8, can combine with combined CTLA4Ig and sirolimus in a well-established primate bone marrow chimerism-induction model. Prolonged engraftment required the presence of all three agents during maintenance therapy, and resulted in graft acceptance for the duration of immunosuppressive treatment, with rejection resulting upon immunosuppression withdrawal. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that upregulation of CD95 expression on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells correlated with rejection, suggesting that CD95 may be a robust biomarker of graft loss. These results are the first to demonstrate prolonged chimerism in primates treated with CD28/mTOR blockade and nondepletional CD40 blockade, and support further investigation of combined costimulation blockade targeting the CD28 and CD40 pathways.     

Anti-CD40L monoclonal antibodies can replace anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies for the nonmyeloablative induction of mixed xenogeneic chimerism

BACKGROUND: We have previously demonstrated that xenogeneic bone marrow engraftment and donor-specific tolerance can be induced in mice receiving anti-CD4, -CD8, -Thy-1.2, and -NK1.1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) on Days -6 and -1, 3 Gy total body irradiation (TBI), and 7 Gy thymic irradiation on Day 0, followed by injection of T-cell depleted (TCD) rat bone marrow cells. We have recently demonstrated that anti-CD40L mAb treatment is sufficient to completely overcome CD4 cell-mediated resistance to allogeneic marrow engraftment and rapidly induce CD4 cell tolerance in an allogeneic combination. METHODS: We investigated the ability of anti-CD40L mAb to promote mixed xenogeneic chimerism and donor-specific tolerance in B6 mice receiving anti-CD8, -Thy1.2 and -NK1.1 mAbs and 3 Gy TBI followed by TCD bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from F344 rats. RESULTS: Administration of anti-CD4 mAb in this model could be completely replaced by one injection of anti-CD40L mAb. Evidence for deletional tolerance was obtained in mixed chimeras prepared with this anti-CD40L-based regimen. However, anti-NK1.1 and anti-Thy1.2 mAb could not be replaced by anti-CD40L mAb. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that anti-CD40L in combination with xenogeneic BMT can tolerize preexisting peripheral and intrathymic CD4 cells to xenoantigens. However, anti-CD40L does not prevent NK cell and/or gammaDelta cell-mediated rejection of xenogeneic bone marrow.     

Earlier Low-Dose TBI or DST Overcomes CD8+ T-Cell-Mediated Alloresistance to Allogeneic Marrow in Recipients of Anti-CD40L

Treatment with a single injection of anti-CD40L (CD154) monoclonal antibody (mAb) and fully mismatched allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT) allows rapid tolerization of CD4+ T cells to the donor. The addition of in vivo CD8 T-cell depletion leads to permanent mixed hematopoietic chimerism and tolerance. We now describe two approaches that obviate the requirement for CD8 T-cell depletion by rapidly tolerizing recipient CD8 T cells in addition to CD4 cells. Administration of donor-specific transfusion (DST) to mice receiving 3 Gy total body irradiation (TBI), BMT and anti-CD40L mAb on day 0 uniformly led to permanent mixed chimerism and tolerance, compared with only 40% of mice receiving similar treatment without DST. In the absence of DST, moving the timing of 3 Gy TBI to day -1 or day -2 instead of day 0 led to rapid (by 2 weeks) induction of CD8+ cell tolerance, and also permitted uniform achievement of permanent mixed chimerism and donor-specific tolerance in recipients of anti-CD40L and BMT on day 0. These nontoxic regimens overcome CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell-mediated alloresistance without requiring host T-cell depletion, permitting the induction of permanent mixed chimerism and tolerance.     

The effect of simultaneous CD154 and LFA-1 blockade on the survival of allogeneic islet grafts in nonobese diabetic mice

BACKGROUND: The rate of success in clinical transplantation of islets of Langerhans has dramatically improved with perspectives of wide-scale applicability for patients with type 1 diabetes. One drawback is the need for lifelong immunosuppression, which is associated with significant side effects. Immunomodulatory strategies devoid of side effects and with tolerogenic potential, such as co-stimulatory blockade, would be a great improvement if successful. In this study, the authors have explored the effect of simultaneous blockade of CD40/CD154 and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)/lymphocyte function-associated antigen (LFA)-1 interactions. METHODS: Spontaneously diabetic nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice underwent transplantation with allogeneic (C57BL/6) islets and were treated with anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody (mAb) (500 microg, three doses), anti-LFA-1 mAb (100 microg, three doses), or a combination of both in the early peritransplant period. In another set of experiments, LFA-1 engagement was impaired by transplanting islets isolated from ICAM-1-knockout (KO) mice. RESULTS: Untreated animals rejected their grafts within 10 days. LFA-1 blockade alone did not result in improved islet graft survival, whereas CD154 blockade alone increased graft survival to 18 days. Simultaneous blockade of both pathways led to significantly improved islet graft survival to 30 days (ICAM-1-KO islets plus anti-CD154), 35 days (anti-LFA-1 plus anti-CD154), and 44 days (ICAM-1-KO islets plus anti-LFA-1 plus anti-CD154). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a synergistic effect for prolonged graft survival can be obtained by simultaneously targeting CD154 and LFA-1 in the challenging model of islet allotransplantation in NOD mice. The observation of similar results with anti-LFA-1 mAb and with ICAM-1-KO grafts suggests a key role of direct antigen presentation for the activation of LFA-1-driven signaling.     

Tolerizing effects of co-stimulation blockade rest on functional dominance of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells

BACKGROUND: Clinical tolerance is the net result of regulatory and effector functions. In this article, the authors show that tolerance induction by co-stimulation blockade preferentially works through CD4CD25 regulatory T-cell-mediated suppression that is effectively achieved by selective reduction of the effector T-cell load. Anti-CD86 and anti-CD40L monoclonal antibody treatment during in vitro mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) typically results in the induction of a suppressive polyclonal T-cell population. This induced suppressive capacity was found to be dependent on the presence of CD4CD25 T cells at the start of MLR. METHODS: Using a CFSE-based strategy, the authors show that within the polyclonal T-cell population, the suppressive effect was exerted by a nondividing CD4CD25 T-cell subset. RESULTS: The cells exclusively originated from preexisting CD4CD25 regulatory T cells and proved anergic and highly suppressive on isolation. They carried the CD45RB and CD62L phenotype and expressed GITR. There was no indication of de novo induction of regulatory T cells by co-stimulation blockers. Instead, the authors observed, both in vitro and in vivo, that co-stimulation blockade shifted the ratio between alloreactive effectors and regulatory T cells in favor of the latter. CONCLUSION: The authors therefore conclude that co-stimulation blockade contributes to functional dominance of regulatory T cells by preventing expansion of alloreactive effector T cells. Tolerance-inducing protocols should ideally facilitate this phenomenon.     

Lack of Role for CsA-Sensitive or Fas Pathways in the Tolerization of CD4 T Cells Via BMT and Anti-CD40L

Anti-CD40L mAb plus bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and recipient CD8 T-cell depletion permits long-term mixed hematopoietic chimerism and systemic donor-specific tolerance to be achieved across full MHC barriers. Initial tolerance is characterized by peripheral deletion of donor-reactive CD4 cells. In regimens using costimulatory blockade without BMT to achieve allograft survival, cyclosporine inhibited graft survival, suggesting that the combination may not be clinically applicable. We assessed the role of cyclosporine-sensitive mechanisms and the mechanisms of T-cell apoptosis involved in the induction of early peripheral CD4+ T-cell tolerance by BMT with anti-CD40L. Neither a short course of cyclosporine (14 days) nor the absence of FAS-mediated activation-induced cell death (AICD) blocked the induction or maintenance of donor-specific tolerance. IL-2 production was not associated with tolerance induction, consistent with the lack of a role for Fas-mediated AICD. Mice in which passive T-cell death was impaired because of constitutive expression of a Bcl-xL transgene did not develop tolerance with this protocol. These data confirm that deletion of donor-reactive T cells is critical for the induction of mixed chimerism and tolerance. However, the mechanisms involved may differ from those involved in costimulatory blockade regimens that do not include BMT.