Prevalence of dyssynchrony and relation with long-term outcome in patients after acute myocardial infarction

The impact of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony on the long-term outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unknown. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of LV dyssynchrony after AMI and the potential relation with adverse events. A total of 976 consecutive patients admitted with AMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention were evaluated. Two-dimensional echocardiography was performed <48 hours after admission. LV dyssynchrony was assessed with speckle-tracking imaging and calculated as the time difference between the earliest and latest activated segments. Patients were followed up for the occurrence of all-cause mortality (the primary end point) or the composite secondary end point (heart failure hospitalization and all-cause mortality). Within 48 hours of admission for the index infarction, mean LV dyssynchrony was 61 ± 79 ms, and 14% of the patients demonstrated a ≥130-ms time difference, defined as significant LV dyssynchrony. During a mean follow-up period of 40 ± 17 months, 82 patients (8%) reached the primary end point. In addition, 36 patients (4%) were hospitalized for heart failure. The presence of LV dyssynchrony was associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure during long-term follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.08, p <0.001, per 10-ms increase). Moreover, LV dyssynchrony provided incremental value over known clinical and echocardiographic risk factors for the prediction of adverse outcomes. In conclusion, LV dyssynchrony is a strong predictor of long-term mortality and hospitalization for heart failure in a population of patients admitted with ST-segment elevation AMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.     

Prevalence and prognostic implications of ST-segment deviations from ambulatory Holter monitoring after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with either fibrinolysis or primary percutaneous coronary intervention (a Danish Trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction-2 Substudy)

Ambulatory Holter monitoring has been shown to be useful in stratifying cardiovascular risk after acute myocardial infarction. However, it remains unclear whether ST-segment deviations might predict clinical outcomes in a population treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with thrombolysis. Holter monitoring was initiated at discharge from ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in 958 patients followed for 2,773 patient-years, randomized to immediate revascularization with either fibrinolysis (n=474) or PCI (n=484). The primary end point was all-cause mortality, and the secondary end point was a composite of death, reinfarction, and disabling stroke. The prevalences of ST-segment depression (STd) and ST-segment elevation (STe) were similar in patients treated with fibrinolysis or PCI (both p=NS). During follow-up, 58 patients died (primary PCI vs fibrinolysis hazard ratio 0.74, p=0.25). The secondary end point was reached in 113 patients (primary PCI vs fibrinolysis hazard ratio 0.66, p=0.03). In fibrinolysis-treated patients, mortality and the secondary end point were significantly higher in patients with STe (both end points p<0.001), an association that remained statistically significant after adjustment for age, gender, anterior infarction, beta-blocker treatment, left ventricular systolic function, and STd (p=0.03 and p=0.005, respectively). Significant associations were not observed for STd. In PCI-treated patients, there was no association between either STe or STd and outcome. In conclusion, immediate revascularization with PCI during STe myocardial infarction does not affect the subsequent prevalence of ST-segment deviation compared with fibrinolysis. However, although STe is an independent predictor of mortality and nonfatal major cardiovascular events in patients treated with fibrinolysis, it does not predict outcome after PCI, perhaps because of more complete revascularization.     

Comparison of direct stenting with conventional stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction

Small studies have suggested that direct stenting without balloon predilatation in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction may reduce microcirculatory dysfunction. To examine the clinical benefits of direct stenting in a large cohort of patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention treated with contemporary pharmacotherapy, the 1-year outcomes from the multicenter, randomized Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial were analyzed. A total of 3,602 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled. The present study cohort consisted of 2,528 patients in whom single lesions (excluding bypass grafts) were treated with stent implantation. At operator discretion, direct stenting was attempted in 698 patients (27.6%), and stenting was performed after predilatation in 1,830 patients (72.4%). Propensity-score matching was performed to reduce bias. Direct stenting was successful in 677 patients (97.0%). ST-segment resolution at 60 minutes after the procedure was improved in patients who underwent direct compared to conventional stenting (median 74.8% vs 68.9%, respectively, p = 0.01). At 1-year follow-up, direct compared to conventional stenting was associated with a significantly lower rate of all-cause death (1.6% vs 3.8%, p = 0.01) and stroke (0.3% vs 1.1%, p = 0.049), with nonsignificant differences in target lesion revascularization, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and major bleeding. Death at 1 year remained significantly lower in the direct stenting group after multivariate adjustment (hazard ratio 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.21 to 0.86, p = 0.02) and in a propensity score-based analysis (hazard ratio 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.88 to 0.95, p = 0.02). In conclusion, compared to stent implantation after predilatation, direct stenting is safe and effective in appropriately selected lesions in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention and may result in improved survival.     

Comparison of five-year outcomes of patients with and without chronic total occlusion of noninfarct coronary artery after primary coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of concurrent chronic total occlusion (CTO) in a noninfarct-related artery (IRA) on the long-term prognosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary disease. Of 1,658 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 666 with multivessel coronary disease who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention from 1999 to 2004 were included in the present analysis. The patients were divided into 2 groups: no CTO and CTO. The first group included 462 patients without CTO (69%) and the second group included 204 patients with CTO in a non-IRA (31%). The in-hospital mortality rate was 6.3% and 21.1% (p < 0.0001) and the 5-year mortality rate was 22.5% and 40.2% (p < 0.0001) for the no-CTO and CTO patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that after correction for baseline differences CTO in a non-IRA was a strong, independent predictor of 5-year mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (hazard ratio 1.85; 95% confidence interval 1.35 to 2.53; p = 0.0001). In conclusion, the presence of CTO in a non-IRA in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary disease is a strong and independent risk factor for greater 5-year mortality.     

Prognostic value of uric acid in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary intervention

Elevated uric acid (UA) levels have been associated with cardiovascular disease in epidemiologic studies. The relation between UA levels and long-term outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention is not known. Data from 2,249 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention were evaluated. Patients were divided into 2 groups with high or low UA using upper limits of normal of 6 mg/dl for women and 7 mg/dl for men. There were 1,643 patients in the low-UA group (mean age 55.9 ± 11.6 years, 85% men) and 606 patients in the high-UA group (mean age 60.5 ± 12.6 years, 76% men). Serum UA levels were 8.0 ± 1.5 mg/dl in the high-UA group and 5.2 ± 1.0 mg/dl in the low-UA group (p <0.001). The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with high UA levels (9% vs 2%, p <0.001), as was the rate of adverse outcomes in patients with high UA. The mean follow-up time was 24.3 months. Cardiovascular mortality, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization, heart failure, and major adverse cardiac events were all significantly higher in the high-UA group. In a multivariate analyses, high plasma UA levels were an independent predictor of major adverse cardiac events in the hospital (odds ratio 2.03, 95% confidence interval 1.25 to 3.75, p = 0.006) and during long-term follow-up (odds ratio 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 2.56, p = 0.03). In conclusion, high UA levels on admission are independently associated with in-hospital and long-term adverse outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention.     

Prognostic value of admission myeloperoxidase levels in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock

Inflammation plays a critical role in acute myocardial infarction. One inflammatory marker is myeloperoxidase (MPO). Its role as a predictor of in-hospital death in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS) is unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the role of MPO as a predictor of in-hospital death in patients with STEMIs presenting with CS and treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. In 38 consecutive patients with CS complicating STEMIs who were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, serum MPO levels were measured at coronary care unit admission using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The primary study end point was in-hospital cardiac death. Among the 38 patients included in the study, 20 died during their coronary care unit stays, whereas 18 survived. Compared with patients who survived, patients who died showed, at coronary care unit admission, higher serum MPO levels (81 +/- 28 vs 56 +/- 23 ng/ml, p <0.006). After controlling for different baseline clinical, laboratory, and angiographic variables, baseline serum MPO level was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality on multivariate analysis (odds ratio 3.9, 95% confidence interval 1.8 to 7.5, p <0.001). In conclusion, admission MPO concentration is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with STEMIs presenting with CS.     

Major adverse upper gastrointestinal events in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary intervention and dual antiplatelet therapy

The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of composite short-term and long-term major adverse upper gastrointestinal (UGI) events (MAUGIEs; defined as gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, gastroduodenal ulcer, or UGI bleeding) in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention and routinely received dual-antiplatelet therapy. From May 2002 to September 2010, a total of 1,368 consecutive patients who experienced ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention were prospectively enrolled in the study. The incidence of in-hospital UGI bleeding complications and composite MAUGIEs was 8.9% and 9.9%, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with in-hospital MAUGIEs than in those without (p <0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that age, advanced Killip score (≥3), and respiratory failure were the strongest independent predictors of in-hospital composite MAUGIEs (all p <0.003). The cumulative composite of MAUGIEs after uneventful discharge in patients without adverse UGI events who continuously received dual-antiplatelet therapy for 3 to 12 months, followed by aspirin therapy, was 10.4% during long-term (mean 4.0 years) follow-up. In conclusion, the results of this study show a remarkably high incidence of composite short-term and long-term MAUGIEs in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention and received routine dual-antiplatelet therapy. Age, advanced Killip score, and respiratory failure were significantly and independently predictive of in-hospital composite MAUGIEs.     

Impact of insulin-requiring diabetes mellitus on effectiveness of reperfusion and outcome of patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction

The relation between diabetes mellitus (DM) and outcome was assessed in a series of 1,061 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The efficacy of reperfusion was assessed by ST-segment resolution analysis. Of 1,061 patients, 166 had DM (15.6%), and 84 had insulin-requiring DM (51% of DM patients). The 6-month mortality rate was 26% in insulin-requiring DM patients, 7% in non-DM patients, and 4% in non-insulin-requiring DM patients (p <0.001). The early ST-segment resolution rate was lower in insulin-requiring DM patients (52%) compared with the other DM patients (78%) and non-DM patients (76%; p <0.001). Multivariate analysis showed insulin-requiring DM to be independently related to the risk for death (hazard ratio 1.94, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 3.22, p = 0.009). Insulin-requiring DM is a strong predictor of mortality in patients who undergo PCI for AMI, and this relation may be explained by a less effective myocardial reperfusion despite the mechanical restoration of normal epicardial flow in most patients.     

Prognostic value of uric acid in patients with acute coronary syndromes

The association between uric acid and cardiovascular disease is incompletely understood. In particular, the prognostic value of uric acid in patients with acute coronary syndromes who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention has not been studied. This study included 5,124 patients with acute coronary syndromes who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention: 1,629 with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 1,332 with acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and 2,163 with unstable angina. The primary end point was 1-year mortality. Patients were divided into quartiles according to uric acid level as follows: quartile 1, 1.3 to <5.3 mg/dl; quartile 2, 5.3 to <6.3 mg/dl; quartile 3, 6.3 to <7.5 mg/dl; and quartile 4, 7.5 to 18.4 mg/dl. There were 450 deaths during follow-up: 80 deaths in quartile 1, 77deaths in quartile 2, 72 deaths in quartile 3, and 221 deaths in quartile 4 of uric acid (Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1-year mortality 6.4%, 6.2%, 5.6%, and 17.4%, respectively; unadjusted hazard ratio 3.05, 95% confidence interval 2.54 to 3.67, p <0.001 for fourth vs first quartile of uric acid). After adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, renal function, and inflammatory status, the association between uric acid and mortality remained significant, with a 12% increase in the adjusted risk for 1-year mortality for every 1 mg/dl increase in the uric acid level. Uric acid improved the discriminatory power of the predictive model regarding 1-year mortality (absolute integrated discrimination improvement 0.008, p = 0.005). In conclusion, elevated levels of uric acid are an independent predictor of 1-year mortality across the whole spectrum of patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.     

Quantitative analysis of the impact of total ischemic time on myocardial perfusion and clinical outcome in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Early reperfusion of the infarct-related coronary artery is an important issue in improvement of outcomes after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In this study, the clinical significance of total ischemic time on myocardial reperfusion and clinical outcomes was evaluated in patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombus aspiration and additional triple-antiplatelet therapy. Total ischemic time was defined as time from symptom onset to first intracoronary therapy (first balloon inflation or thrombus aspiration). All patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention with total ischemic times ≥30 minutes and <24 hours from 2005 to 2008 were selected. Ischemic times were available in 1,383 patients, of whom 18.4% presented with total ischemic times ≤2 hours, 31.2% >2 to 3 hours, 26.8% >3 to 5 hours, and 23.5% >5 hours. Increased ischemic time was associated with age, female gender, hypertension, and diabetes. Patients with total ischemic times <5 hours more often had myocardial blush grade 3 (40% to 45% vs 22%, p <0.001) and complete ST-segment resolution (55% to 60% vs 42%, p = 0.002) than their counterparts with total ischemic times >5 hours. In addition, patients with total ischemic times ≤5 hours had lower 30-day mortality (1.5% vs 4.0%, p = 0.032) than patients with total ischemic times >5 hours. In conclusion, in this contemporary cohort of patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, triple-antiplatelet therapy, and thrombus aspiration, short ischemic time was associated with better myocardial reperfusion and decreased mortality. After a 5-hour period in which outcomes remain relatively stable, myocardial reperfusion becomes suboptimal and mortality increases.     

急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者高血栓负荷的相关因素

目的:分析在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction,STEMI)患者的急性期,梗死相关血管内血栓高负荷的相关因素。方法: 195例发病时间在12 h以内行急诊经皮冠脉介入(PCI)术的STEMI患者,根据冠脉造影结果分为高血栓负荷组(n=84)和低血栓负荷组(n=111)。受试患者入院急查高敏C反应蛋白(high-sensitivity C-reactive protein,hs-CRP),白介素-6(interleukin-6,IL-6),可溶性细胞内黏附分子1(soluble intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1,sICAM-1),P选择素(p selectin,PS)和白细胞(white blood cell,WBC)计数。结果: 高血栓负荷组PS、CK-MB峰值和WBC水平显著高于低血栓负荷组［(14±8) μg/L vs. (8±4) μg/L;(42±52) μg/L vs. (34±39) μg/L;(11±4)×109/L vs. (10±3)×109/L,均P<0.05)。Logistic 回归分析PS(OR=1.259,95%CI 1.125-1.408,P<0.01)是血栓负荷独立的相关因素。结论: PS是STEMI患者闭塞血管高血栓负荷的独立相关指标。     

Comparison of angiographic and other findings and mortality in non-ST-segment elevation versus ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients undergoing early invasive intervention

We sought to compare the angiographic findings and mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI) versus ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing early invasive intervention. Of 11,872 patients enrolled in the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry from November 2005 to January 2008, we studied patients with NSTEMI undergoing early invasive intervention (n = 1,486) and those with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 4,392). Multivessel coronary disease, baseline Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3, and the left circumflex artery as a culprit lesion occurred more frequently in patients with NSTEMI than in those with STEMI. Those with NSTEMI had a significantly lower mortality rate than those with STEMI during a median follow-up of about 12 months (3.8% vs 6.7%, p <0.001). In the patients with NSTEMI, the independent predictors of mortality included postprocedural TIMI flow grade 0 to 2 (hazard ratio [HR] 3.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 9.29, p = 0.047) and multivessel coronary disease (HR 3.83, 95% CI 1.36 to 10.81, p = 0.010) but not baseline TIMI flow or infarct location. However, baseline TIMI flow grade 0 to 2 (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.36, p = 0.035), anterior infarction (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.23, p <0.001), multivessel coronary disease (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.91, p = 0.008), and postprocedural TIMI flow grade 0 to 2 (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.42 to 2.82, p <0.001) were all independent predictors of mortality in the patients with STEMI. In conclusion, the angiographic findings in patients from NSTEMI differ from those in patients with STEMI. Postprocedural TIMI flow and multivessel coronary disease were independent predictors of mortality in patients with NSTEMI undergoing early invasive intervention.     

Effectiveness and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolytic therapy for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction

The goal of treatment of an acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is the timely restoration of myocardial blood flow to decrease myocardial necrosis and thereby preserve cardiac tissue and overall function. Mainstays of reperfusion treatment include fibrinolytic therapy and/or primary percutaneous coronary intervention. In those patients who are treated with fibrinolysis, there is debate as to whether and when they should also undergo subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention. In conclusion, the investigators review the published reports on systematic percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolytic therapy in the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and discuss the rationale behind this treatment strategy.     

Early angiography versus conservative treatment in patients with non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction: MITI Investigators. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention

OBJECTIVES: To compare short- and long-term outcome after early invasive or conservative strategies in the treatment of non-ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether or not there is benefit from emergent invasive diagnosis and treatment of AMI in patients without ST segment elevation on the admission electrocardiogram (ECG). METHODS: In a cohort of 1,635 consecutive patients with AMI who presented to hospitals without ST segment elevation on their admission ECG, we compared treatments, hospital course and outcome in 308 patients who presented to hospitals whose initial strategy favored early angiography and appropriate intervention when indicated versus 1,327 similar patients who presented to hospitals that favor a more conservative initial approach. RESULTS: At baseline, patients admitted to hospitals favoring an early invasive strategy were younger, more predominately Caucasian and had less comorbidity. Early coronary angiography occurred in 58.8% versus 8% (p < 0.001), and early angioplasty was performed in 44.8% versus 6.1% (p < 0.001) in the two different cohorts. Patients treated in hospitals favoring the early invasive strategy had a lower 30-day (5.5% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.026) and four-year mortality (20% vs. 37%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a trend towards lower hospital mortality (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.29 to 1.09) and a significant lower long-term mortality (hazard ratio = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.80) in patients admitted to hospitals favoring an early invasive strategy. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggested that an early invasive strategy in patients with AMI and nondiagnostic ECG changes is associated with lower long-term mortality.     

Cystatin C as prognostic biomarker in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction

Cystatin C is a marker of renal dysfunction, and preliminary studies have suggested it might have a role as a prognostic marker in patients with coronary artery disease. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of cystatin C for risk stratification of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, regarding in-hospital and long-term outcomes. We included 153 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty. The baseline cystatin C level was measured at coronary angiography. The in-hospital outcome was determined as progression to cardiogenic shock or in-hospital death, and the long-term outcome was assessed, considering the following end points: (1) death and (2) death or reinfarction. Of the 153 patients evaluated (age 61 ± 12 years; 75.6% men), 15 (14.4%) progressed to cardiogenic shock and 4 (2.7%) died during hospitalization. The patients who progressed to cardiogenic shock or died during hospitalization had significantly greater cystatin C levels (1.02 ± 0.44 vs 0.69 ± 0.24 mg/L; p = 0.001). Long-term follow-up was available for 130 patients (583 ± 163 days). Among them, 11 patients died and 7 had reinfarction. A high baseline cystatin C level was associated with an increased risk of death (hazard ratio 8.5; p = 0.009) and death or reinfarction (hazard ratio 3.89; p = 0.021). Furthermore, only high baseline cystatin C levels and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% were independent predictors of the long-term risk of death, with synergistic interaction between the 2. In conclusion, cystatin C is a new biomarker with significant added prognostic value for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, predicting both short- and long-term outcomes.     

Osteoprotegerin Predicts Long-Term Outcome in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background: Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a glycoprotein with a regulatory role in immune, skeletal and vascular systems. Data suggest that high circulating OPG levels are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. We analyzed the association between OPG and long-term outcome in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Methods: We included 716 consecutive STEMI patients admitted to a single high-volume invasive heart center from September 2006 to December 2008. Endpoints were all-cause mortality, repeat myocardial infarction, admission due to heart failure and combinations thereof. Median follow-up lasted 27 months (interquartile range: 22-33). Results: OPG levels exhibited a non-Gaussian distribution and were therefore divided into quartiles. High levels of OPG were significantly associated with a worse outcome. After adjustment for conventional risk factors (e.g. C-reactive protein, estimated glomerular filtration rate, symptom-to-balloon time and troponin I) using Cox regression, OPG remained a significantly independent predictor of death (HR per increase in OPG quartile: 1.28; CI: 1.03-1.59; p = 0.03), repeat myocardial infarction (HR: 1.30; CI: 1.00-1.68; p = 0.05) and admission with heart failure (HR: 1.50; CI: 1.18-1.90; p = 0.001). Conclusion: This study shows that OPG independently predicts long-term outcome in STEMI patients treated with pPCI. Eventually, this knowledge could improve risk stratification and overall outcome.     

Long-term follow-up of patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty or thrombolysis. Results of the MITRA trial

Long-term follow-up after treatment with primary angioplasty compared to treatment with thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains still to be determined. We therefore analyzed the data of the "Maximal Individual Therapy" in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA-1) Registry. Follow-up data for a median of 17 months after discharge were available in 2090 out of 2195 (95%) AMI patients treated with thrombolysis, as well as 293 out of 312 patients (94%) treated with primary angioplasty. There were only small differences in patient characteristics between the two treatment groups. Compared to patients treated with thrombolysis, those treated with primary angioplasty had a higher prevalence of prior myocardial infarction (16.4% versus 12.2%, p = 0.04), longer prehospital delay: 10 minutes (130 minutes versus 120 minutes, p = 0.002), and a longer door-to-treatment time: 45 minutes (p < 0.001). Primary angioplasty patients were more likely to be treated with beta-blockers (primary angioplasty 79.8% versus thrombolysis 66.2%, p < 0.001) or statins (24.5% versus 16.5%, p < 0.001). There was no difference between the treatment groups for total mortality (p = 0.90) nor for the combined endpoint of death or re-infarction (p = 0.85). However, the combined endpoint of death, re-infarction or percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary bypass surgery was significantly lower in the primary angioplasty group (primary angioplasty 25.6% versus thrombolysis 32.3%, univariate odds ratio 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55-0.95, p = 0.02). This result was confirmed by multivariate analysis after adjusting for confounding parameters (multivariate odds ratio: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.42-0.91). The beneficial effect of primary angioplasty compared to thrombolysis achieved during the hospital stay after an AMI is maintained during a 17 month follow-up. AMI patients treated with thrombolysis were more likely to be treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary bypass surgery after discharge.     

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing intracoronary and intravenous administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (GPIs) have been widely adopted as an adjuvant regimen during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, but whether intracoronary administration of these potent antiplatelet agents conveys better efficacy and safety over the intravenous route has not been well addressed. A meta-analysis was performed by a systematic search of the published research for randomized controlled trials comparing intracoronary versus intravenous administration of GPIs in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Eight studies involving 686 patients in the intracoronary arm and 660 in the intravenous arm met the inclusion criteria. Postprocedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow (odds ratio [OR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08 to 1.98, p <0.05) and myocardial reperfusion grade 2 or 3 (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.46, p <0.001) were markedly more often achieved in patients who received intracoronary boluses of GPIs than those receiving the intravenous strategy. Intracoronary administration resulted in a reduced incidence of mortality (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.92, p <0.05), target vessel revascularization (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.99, p <0.05), and the composite end point of major adverse cardiac events (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.76, p <0.005) at 30-day follow-up. No significant difference was found in terms of major or minor bleeding (OR 1.14, p = 0.71, and OR 0.86, p = 0.47 respectively). In conclusion, intracoronary administration of GPIs yielded favorable outcomes in postprocedural blood flow restoration and 30-day clinical prognosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The intracoronary use of GPIs can be recommended as a preferred regimen during primary percutaneous coronary intervention.     

Impact of smoking on outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the HORIZONS-AMI Trial)

We assessed the impact of smoking on outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention using alternative antithrombotic regimens and stent types. In the HORIZONS-AMI trial 3,602 patients were randomly assigned to unfractionated heparin (UFH) plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) or bivalirudin alone and paclitaxel-eluting stents or bare-metal stents. Compared to nonsmokers, smokers had significantly lower rates of mortality and major bleeding at 30 days and at 1 year; however, the differences were no longer significant after covariate adjustment. Smoking was associated with increased rates of definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) at 1 year (adjusted RR 1.99, 95% confidence interval 1.28 to 3.10) mainly because of a higher rate of late ST after paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation (1.9% vs 0.4%, p = 0.0006). In smokers bivalirudin monotherapy compared to UFH plus a GPI was associated with lower mortality at 30 days (0.5% vs 2.2%, p = 0.002) and at 1 year (1.8% vs 4.0%, p = 0.008). No decrease in mortality was seen with bivalirudin in nonsmokers. Major bleeding was significantly decreased with bivalirudin regardless of smoking status (smokers 3.7% vs 8.9%, p <0.0001; nonsmokers 6.5% vs 9.6%, p = 0.01). In conclusion, in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, smoking is an independent predictor of definite/probable ST at 1 year. Bivalirudin monotherapy compared to UFH plus a GPI decreased major bleeding regardless of smoking status but may have different effects on individual components of ischemic events.