Antifungal agents for preventing fungal infections in non-neutropenic critically ill and surgical patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to systematically identify and summarize the effects of antifungal prophylaxis in non-neutropenic critically ill adult patients on all-cause mortality and the incidence of invasive fungal infections. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in all languages comparing the prophylactic use of any antifungal agent or regimen with placebo, no antifungal or another antifungal agent or regimen in non-neutropenic critically ill adult patients. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to 2 September 2005) and EMBASE (1980 to week 36, 2005). We also hand-searched reference lists, abstracts of conference proceedings and scientific meetings (1998-2004) and contacted authors of included studies and pharmaceutical manufacturers. The primary outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality and proven invasive fungal infections. Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria, performed quality assessment and extracted data using an intention-to-treat approach. Data were synthesized using the random effects model and expressed as relative risk with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Twelve unique trials (eight comparing fluconazole and four ketoconazole with no antifungal or a non-absorbable agent) involving 1606 randomized patients were included. For both outcomes of total mortality and invasive fungal infections, almost all trials of fluconazole and ketoconazole separately showed a non-significant risk reduction with prophylaxis. When combined, fluconazole/ketoconazole reduced total mortality by one-quarter (relative risk 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.59-0.97) and invasive fungal infections by about one-half (relative risk 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.31-0.68). No significant increase in the incidence of infection or colonization with the azole-resistant fungal pathogens Candida glabrata or Candida krusei was demonstrated, although the confidence intervals of the summary effect measures were wide. Adverse effects requiring treatment discontinuation were not more common amongst patients receiving prophylaxis. Results across all trials were homogeneous despite considerable heterogeneity in clinical and methodological characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis with fluconazole or ketoconazole in critically ill patients reduces invasive fungal infections by one-half and total mortality by one-quarter. Although no significant increase in azole-resistant Candida species associated with prophylaxis was demonstrated, trials were not powered to exclude such an effect. In patients at increased risk of invasive fungal infections, antifungal prophylaxis with fluconazole should be considered.     

Fluconazole prophylaxis prevents intra-abdominal candidiasis in high-risk surgical patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous fluconazole for the prevention of intra-abdominal Candida infections in high-risk surgical patients. DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Two university-affiliated hospitals in Switzerland. PATIENTS: Forty-nine surgical patients with recurrent gastrointestinal perforations or anastomotic leakages. INTERVENTIONS: Prophylaxis with intravenous fluconazole (400 mg per day) or placebo continued until resolution of the underlying surgical condition. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were evaluated daily, and specimens for culture were obtained three times per week during prophylaxis. The primary study end points were the frequency of and the time to intra-abdominal Candida infections. Secondary end points were the frequency of candidiasis (intra-abdominal and extra-abdominal) and the emergence or persistence of Candida colonization. Among patients who were not colonized at study entry, Candida was isolated from surveillance cultures during prophylaxis in 15% of the patients in the fluconazole group and in 62% of the patients in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.96; p = .04). Candida peritonitis occurred in one of 23 patients (4%) who received fluconazole and in seven of 20 patients (35%) who received placebo (relative risk, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.02 to 0.93; p = .02). In addition, one catheter-related Candida albicans sepsis occurred in a fluconazole-treated patient. Thus, overall, candidiasis developed in two fluconazole patients and seven placebo patients (relative risk, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.06 to 1.06; p = .06). C. albicans accounted for 87% of the Candida species isolated before or during prophylaxis, and all C. albicans strains were susceptible to fluconazole. Fluconazole was well tolerated, and adverse events occurred at similar frequencies in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Fluconazole prophylaxis prevents colonization and invasive intra-abdominal Candida infections in high-risk surgical patients.     

Fluconazole for the management of invasive candidiasis: where do we stand after 15 years?

Candida spp. are responsible for most of the fungal infections in humans. Available since 1990, fluconazole is well established as a leading drug in the setting of prevention and treatment of mucosal and invasive candidiasis. Fluconazole displays predictable pharmacokinetics and an excellent tolerance profile in all groups, including the elderly and children. Fluconazole is a fungistatic drug against yeasts and lacks activity against moulds. Candida krusei is intrinsically resistant to fluconazole, and other species, notably Candida glabrata, often manifest reduced susceptibility. Emergence of azole-resistant strains as well as discovery of new antifungal drugs (new triazoles and echinocandins) have raised important questions about its use as a first line drug. The aim of this review is to summarize the main available data on the position of fluconazole in the prophylaxis or curative treatment of invasive Candida spp. infections. Fluconazole is still a major drug for antifungal prophylaxis in the setting of transplantation (solid organ and bone marrow), intensive care unit, and in neutropenic patients. Prophylactic fluconazole still has a place in HIV-positive patients in viro-immunological failure with recurrent mucosal candidiasis. Fluconazole can be used in adult neutropenic patients with systemic candidiasis, as long as the species identified is a priori susceptible. Among non-neutropenic patients with candidaemia fluconazole is one of the first line drugs for susceptible species. Cases reports and uncontrolled studies have also reported its efficacy in the setting of osteoarthritis, endophthalmitis, meningitis, endocarditis and peritonitis caused by Candida spp. among immunocompetent adults. In paediatrics, fluconazole is a well tolerated and major prophylactic drug for high-risk neonates, as well as an alternative treatment for neonatal candidiasis. Importantly 15 years after its introduction in the antifungal armamentarium, fluconazole is still a first line treatment option in several cases of invasive candidiasis. Its prophylactic use should however be limited to selected high-risk patients to limit the risk of emergence of azole-resistant strains.     

Association of Torulopsis glabrata infections with fluconazole prophylaxis in neutropenic bone marrow transplant patients.

Because the use of fluconazole prophylaxis had been associated with an increased rate of Candida krusei infections at The John Hopkins Oncology Center, early empiric amphotericin B plus flucytosine were given to febrile neutropenic patients colonized by C. krusei. By this practice, the proportion of fungemias attributable to C. krusei was low (12.5%) in patients receiving fluconazole over a 6-month interval. However, Torulopsis (Candida) glabrata assumed a much higher proportion of fungemias (75%) among patients receiving fluconazole. In vitro susceptibility testing combined with this clinical experience suggests that some T. glabrata isolates are not susceptible to fluconazole and can cause breakthrough infections in patients receiving fluconazole.     

Urine D-arabinitol/L-arabinitol ratio in diagnosing Candida infection in patients with haematological malignancy and HIV infection

Adult patients with hematologic malignancies along with HIV infected patients were prospectively studied to determine the performance of urine D-arabinitol/L-arabinitol (DA/LA) ratio in diagnosing invasive candidiasis. Ten evaluable febrile neutropenic patients had proven invasive candidiasis and elevated DA/LA ratios were found in 5. Invasive candidiasis with normal DA/LA ratios was most frequently due to Candida krusei infection. This Candida species is a non-producer of arabinitol. Only 4 of 81 febrile neutropenic patients given either antifungal prophylaxis or empiric antifungal treatment had elevated DA/LA ratios. Only 1 of 15 HIV positive patients with either oropharyngeal or esophageal candidiasis had elevated DA/LA ratios. Widespread use of fluconazole prophylaxis in bone marrow transplantation patients at the study hospital has led to an increased prevalence of C. krusei infection. This is the likely reason for the low sensitivity of the test in proven and suspected invasive Candida infections reported here.     

An open-label randomized trial comparing itraconazole oral solution with fluconazole oral solution for primary prophylaxis of fungal infections in patients with haematological malignancy and profound neutropenia

OBJECTIVES: This trial studied the efficacy and safety of itraconazole and fluconazole in the prevention of invasive fungal infections in neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An 8 week, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, multicentre trial comparing itraconazole oral solution (2.5 mg/kg twice daily; N=248) with fluconazole oral solution or capsules (400 mg daily; N=246) in 494 patients with anticipated profound neutropenia (i.e. neutrophil count expected to be <500 cells/mm3 for at least 10 days) from tertiary care centres. RESULTS: Invasive fungal infections were reported for 4 out of 248 patients (1.6%) in the itraconazole group and 5 out of 246 patients (2.0%) in the fluconazole group. Invasive Aspergillus infections were proven for 2 out of 248 patients (0.8%) in the itraconazole group and 3 out of 246 patients (1.2%) in the fluconazole group. For both the ITT and profoundly neutropenic populations, no differences were detected between treatment groups in proven or suspected invasive fungal infections or other endpoints. The mortality rates owing to proven invasive fungal infections were 2 out of 248 patients (0.8%) for the itraconazole group and 3 out of 246 patients (1.2%) for the fluconazole group. There was also no difference between treatment groups in the number of patients who recovered from neutropenia or in the duration of neutropenia. More discontinuation of drug intake owing to nausea and more hypokalaemia occurred in the itraconazole group, other adverse events and the total number of adverse events were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study there were no differences in the efficacy and safety of itraconazole and fluconazole prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies.     

Prospective Study of Candida Species in Patients at a Comprehensive Cancer Center

Since most nosocomial systemic yeast infections arise from the endogenous flora of the patient, we prospectively evaluated the species stratification and antifungal susceptibility profile of Candida spp. associated with heavy colonization and systemic infection in patients at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York. A total of 349 Candida isolates were obtained from 223 patients during the later half of 1998. Cancer was the most common underlying disease, occurring in 91% of the patients, including 61.8% with organ and 23.7% with hematological malignancies; 4.4% of the patients had AIDS. Candida albicans was the predominant species (67.3%); among 114 non-albicans Candida spp., C. glabrata (45.6%) was the most frequent, followed by C. tropicalis (18.4%), C. parapsilosis (16.6%), and C. krusei (9.6%). The overall resistance to triazole-based agents among all yeast isolates was 9.4 and 10.8% for fluconazole and itraconazole, respectively. A total of 5% of C. albicans strains were resistant to triazole antifungals, whereas 30.8 and 46.2% of C. glabrata strains were resistant to fluconazole (MIC > or = 64 microg/ml) and itraconazole (MIC > or = 1 microg/ml), respectively. A significant association was observed between prior treatment with triazole and isolation of fluconazole-resistant C. albicans (P = 0.005, OR 36), although this relationship was not seen in C. glabrata isolates (P = 0.4). This study reinforces the importance of periodic, prospective surveillance of clinical fungal isolates to determine appropriate prophylactic, empiric, and preemptive antifungal therapy for the highly susceptible patient population.     

Prevention of severe Candida infections in nonneutropenic,high-risk,critically ill patients: a randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled trial in patients treated by selective digestive decontamination

OBJECTIVE: Infections caused by Candida spp. are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients and usually develop from endogenous colonization. We assessed the effectiveness of adding fluconazole to a selective digestive decontamination regimen to prevent candidal infections. DESIGN AND SETTING: We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial among medical and surgical intensive care unit patients at a large university hospital. PATIENTS: All adult patients mechanically ventilated for at least 48 h with an expectation to remain so for at least an additional 72 h, and receiving selective decontamination of the digestive tract. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned fluconazole 100 mg daily (n=103) or placebo (n=101). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Candida infections occurred less frequently in the fluconazole group (5.8%) than in the placebo group (16%; rate ratio 0.35; Cl(95) 0.11-0.94). Some 90% of candidemia episodes occurred in the placebo group (rate ratio for fluconazole use 0.10; Cl(95) 0.02-0.74). The rate of treatment failure, development of candidal infection, or increased colonization, was 32% in the fluconazole group and 67% in the placebo group (P<0.001). Crude in-hospital mortality was similar in the two groups (39% fluconazole vs. 41% placebo). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic use of fluconazole in a selected group of mechanically ventilated patients at high risk for infection reduces the incidence of Candida infections, in particular candidemia.     

Antifungal activity of amphotericin B,fluconazole, and voriconazole in an in vitro model of Candida catheter-related bloodstream infection

The activity of five simulated antifungal regimens for eradication of catheter-related bloodstream Candida infection was evaluated with an in vitro pharmacodynamic model. Single-lumen central venous catheters were colonized with Candida species by sequentially incubating central venous catheters in plasma and then in growth medium (RPMI plus morpholinepropanesulfonic acid) containing a standardized suspension (10(5) CFU/ml) of Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, or slime-producing Candida parapsilosis. Colonized central venous catheters were then placed in a one-compartment pharmacodynamic model where five antifungal regimens (plus control) were simulated: amphotericin B, 1.0 mg/kg every 24 h; amphotericin B, 0.5 mg/kg every 24 h; fluconazole, 400 mg every 24 h; fluconazole, 800 mg every 24 h; and voriconazole, 4 mg/kg every 12 h. During exposure to the simulated clinical regimens, samples were serially removed from the model over 48 h for quantitation of viable organisms. All antifungal regimens suppressed fungal counts by both peripheral and catheter sampling versus control (P = 0.001). Overall, antifungal activity ranked amphotericin B (1 mg/kg) > amphotericin B (0.5 mg/kg) > or = voriconazole > fluconazole (800 mg) > or = fluconazole (400 mg). No regimen, however, completely eradicated (by culture and electron microscopy) central venous catheter colonization. Regrowth was noted in the model during therapy against C. glabrata and C. parapsilosis but was not associated with an increase in the MICs for the isolates. Lack of in vitro antifungal activity against biofilm-encased organisms appeared to be the primary reason for mycological failure of antifungal regimens in the model.     

Pharmacodynamics of echinocandins against Candida glabrata: requirement for dosage escalation to achieve maximal antifungal activity in neutropenic hosts

Candida glabrata is a leading cause of disseminated candidiasis. The echinocandins are increasingly used as first-line agents for the treatment of patients with this syndrome, although the optimal regimen for the treatment of invasive Candida glabrata infections in neutropenic patients is not known. We studied the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of micafungin, anidulafungin, and caspofungin in a neutropenic murine model of disseminated Candida glabrata infection to gain further insight into optimal therapeutic options for patients with this syndrome. A mathematical model was fitted to the data and used to bridge the experimental results to humans. The intravenous inoculation of Candida glabrata in mice was followed by logarithmic growth throughout the experimental period (101 h). A dose-dependent decline in fungal burden was observed following the administration of 0.1 to 20 mg/kg of body weight every 24 h for all three agents. The exposure-response relationships for each drug partitioned into distinct fungistatic and fungicidal components of activity. Surprisingly, the average human drug exposures following currently licensed regimens were predicted to result in a fungistatic antifungal effect. Higher human dosages of all three echinocandins are required to induce fungicidal effects in neutropenic hosts.     

The place for itraconazole in treatment

The incidence of systemic fungal infections has risen sharply in the last two decades, reflecting a rise in the number of patients who are predisposed to these diseases because they are immunosuppressed or immunocompromised. The growing use of intensive chemotherapy to treat cancer, highly immunosuppressive drug regimens (not only in transplant recipients), widespread prophylactic or empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics, prolonged parenteral nutrition, long-term indwelling lines, improved survival in neonatal and other intensive care units, together with the AIDS epidemic have led to an upsurge in the number of patients at risk. In addition, there have been changes in the epidemiology of systemic fungal infections, with Aspergillus spp. and Candida spp. other than Candida albicans becoming increasingly common causes. These changes have affected the selection of drugs for first-line or prophylactic use, as not all agents have the critical spectrum of activity required. The management of systemic fungal infections can be divided into four main strategies: prophylaxis, early empirical use, pre-emptive and definite therapy. Antifungal prophylaxis is given based on the patient risk factors, but in the absence of infection. Empirical antifungal therapy is given in patients at risk with signs of infection of unclear aetiology (usually persistent fever) but of possible fungal origin. Therapy is given pre-emptively in patients at risk with additional evidence for the presence of an infective agent in a way predisposing for infection (e.g. Aspergillus colonization; high Candida colonization index). Finally, definite treatment is used in patients with confirmed fungal infection. The distinction between risk-adapted prophylaxis, early empirical therapy, and pre-emptive use of antifungals often becomes unclear and clinical decision making depends largely on local epidemiology and resistance patterns, adequate definition of patient risk categories, early diagnosis and the calculation of cost-benefit ratios. This article addresses the use of itraconazole in the treatment of invasive fungal infections in the haematology patient.     

Real-time antifungal susceptibility screening aids management of invasive yeast infections in immunocompromised patients

We examined the utility of a semi-solid agar antifungal susceptibility screening (SAAS) test in real-time management of eight immunocompromised patients with invasive yeast infections. Tests of amphotericin B and fluconazole concentrations of 0.5 and 2 mg/L and 1, 8 and 40 mg/L, respectively, were performed on Candida albicans (two), Candida tropicalis (two), Candida krusei (one), Candida glabrata (one) and Trichosporon species (spp.) (two). All but the Trichosporon spp. and C. glabrata isolates were resistant to fluconazole at > or = 40 mg/L, and patients were successfully managed accordingly. Real-time antifungal susceptibility screening can assist in clinical management of invasive yeast infections.     

Prospective,multicenter surveillance study of Candida glabrata: fluconazole and itraconazole susceptibility profiles in bloodstream,invasive, and colonizing strains and differences between isolates from three urban teaching hospitals in New York City (Candida Susceptibility Trends Study, 1998 to 1999)

Since the 1990s, the substantial increase in the rate of Candida glabrata infections has become a serious problem. As most C. glabrata infections arise from the host's endogenous microflora, the present prospective, multicenter analysis included all clinical isolates associated with colonization and with systemic and hematogenous candidiasis. Among 347 C. glabrata isolates, the overall rates of resistance to fluconazole (MIC > or = 64 micro g/ml) and itraconazole (MIC > or = 1 micro g/ml) were 10.7 and 15.2%, respectively, although for half (n = 148) of the itraconazole-susceptible isolates the MICs (0.25 to 0.5 micro g/ml) were in the susceptible-dependent upon dose range. Fluconazole resistance was more common among C. glabrata isolates obtained from centers caring for patients with cancer (MICs at which 90% of isolates are inhibited [MIC(90)s] = 32 micro g/ml) or AIDS (MIC(90)s > 64 micro g/ml) than among C. glabrata isolates from a community-based university medical center (MIC(90)s = 16 micro g/ml) (P = 0.001). Thirty-three bloodstream isolates and those obtained from other body sites had similar in vitro susceptibility profiles. The fluconazole MIC(90)s (< or =16 micro g/ml) for C. glabrata yeast isolates from the gastrointestinal tract were lower than those (> or =64 micro g/ml) for C. glabrata isolates from respiratory and urinary tract samples (P = 0.01). A similar discrepancy for itraconazole was not significant (P > 0.5). We did not observe differences in fluconazole or itraconazole susceptibility profiles among C. glabrata isolates associated with either hematogenous dissemination or colonization. The significant discrepancy in antifungal susceptibility among C. glabrata organisms isolated from hospitals in the same geographic region emphasizes the significance of periodic susceptibility surveillance programs for individual institutions, especially those providing care to patients at risk.     

Cost-effectiveness analysis of antifungal prophylaxis in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND: Micafungin sodium is indicated for the prophylaxis of Candida infections in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). One Phase III, multi-institutional, randomized, doubleblind comparative trial involving 882 adult and pediatric patients found that micafungin was more effective, in terms of significantly lower rates of systemic fungal infections and empiric antifungal therapy (AFT), than fluconazole as antifungal prophylaxis during the neutropenic phase following HSCT. Thus, despite the higher cost of micafungin versus fluconazole, micafungin prophylaxis may be associated with reduced costs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this analysis was to determine the cost-effectiveness of micafungin prophylaxis compared with fluconazole prophylaxis in patients undergoing HSCT. METHODS: Efficacy data were taken from the clinical study. The economic analysis was conducted from the hospital perspective, using costs incurred from admission through discharge. Each of the patients was assigned costs and effectiveness based on outcomes data from the clinical study. Published literature was used to estimate hospital costs associated with HSCT and prophylaxis, empiric AFT, and treatment of a probable or proven Candida or Aspergillus infection. Mean costs and effectiveness were calculated in each treatment group. To test the variability of the results using repeated sampling, a bootstrapping analysis was also conducted, with 1,000 simulations of random samples of 100 patients from each treatment group. If appropriate to describe the results, incremental cost effectiveness ratios were calculated, and sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying components of cost. RESULTS: This analysis included data from 882 patients (527 males, 355 females; micafungin, 425 patients, mean age, 43.2 years [range, 0.6-73.0 years]; fluconazole, 457 patients, mean age, 41.9 years [range, 0.6-71.0 years]). Total hospital costs per patient were USD121,098 and USD124,957 in micafungin and fluconazole recipients, respectively-a difference of USD3,859. The bootstrapping analysis found that micafungin prophylaxis was cost-saving in 72.4% of the samples compared with 9.2% with fluconazole prophylaxis. Sensitivity analyses on estimated hospital costs found that micafungin was a cost-effective therapy. CONCLUSION: In this analysis of data from a clinical study in adults and children undergoing HSCT, micafungin prophylaxis was associated with reduced hospital costs, and resultant total patient costs, compared with fluconazole prophylaxis.     

Susceptibility patterns of Candida species recovered from Canadian intensive care units

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the speciation and susceptibility patterns of Candida species recovered from Canadian intensive care units (ICUs) during a 1-day point-prevalence study on fungal colonization/infection in Canadian ICUs. METHODS AND SETTING: Blood, urine, respiratory tract, rectal, and wound fungal cultures were performed for 357 patients present at any time during a single-day 24-hour period in 35 Canadian ICUs. Comparative in vitro activities of amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, micafungin, anidulafungin, and aminocandin were determined. RESULTS: Four hundred fifteen yeasts (409 Candida species and 6 non-Candida yeasts) were recovered. Almost 50% of the patients were found to have positive respiratory tract or rectal cultures. Candida albicans accounted for 72% of the Candida species isolated, followed by Candida glabrata (16%), Candida tropicalis (5%), Candida parapsilosis (3%), Candida krusei (2%), and other Candida species or nonspeciated isolates (2%). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (milligrams per liter) at which 90% of the strains were inhibited were 0.06 for micafungin as well as anidulafungin, 0.12 for voriconazole, 0.25 for itraconazole, posaconazole, as well as aminocandin, 1 for amphotericin B, and 4 for fluconazole. Only 4% of the isolates were resistant to fluconazole and/or itraconazole. CONCLUSIONS: Candida albicans is the predominant species colonizing Canadian ICU patients. Overall, the triazoles, both older and new compounds, and the echinocandins have excellent in vitro antifungal activities against Candida species recovered from Canadian ICUs patients.     

Itraconazole oral solution for primary prophylaxis of fungal infections in patients with hematological malignancy and profound neutropenia: a randomized, double-blind, double-placebo, multicenter trial comparing itraconazole and amphotericin B

Systemic and superficial fungal infections are a major problem among immunocompromised patients with hematological malignancy. A double-blind, double-placebo, randomized, multicenter trial was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of itraconazole oral solution (2.5 mg/kg of body weight twice a day) with amphotericin B capsules (500 mg orally four times a day) for prophylaxis of systemic and superficial fungal infection. Prophylactic treatment was initiated on the first day of chemotherapy and was continued until the end of the neutropenic period (>0.5 x 10(9) neutrophils/liter) or up to a maximum of 3 days following the end of neutropenia, unless a systemic fungal infection was documented or suspected. The maximum treatment duration was 56 days. In the intent-to-treat population, invasive aspergillosis was noted in 5 (1.8%) of the 281 patients assigned to itraconazole oral solution and in 9 (3.3%) of the 276 patients assigned to oral amphotericin B; of these, 1 and 4 patients died, respectively. Proven systemic fungal infection (including invasive aspergillosis) occurred in 8 patients (2.8%) who received itraconazole, compared with 13 (4.7%) who received oral amphotericin B. Itraconazole significantly reduced the incidence of superficial fungal infections as compared to oral amphotericin B (2 [1%] versus 13 [5%]; P = 0.004). Although the incidences of suspected fungal infection (including fever of unknown origin) were not different between the groups, fewer patients were administered intravenous systemic antifungals (mainly intravenous amphotericin B) in the group receiving itraconazole than in the group receiving oral amphotericin B (114 [41%] versus 132 [48%]; P = 0.066). Adequate plasma itraconazole levels were achieved in about 80% of the patients from 1 week after the start of treatment. In both groups, the trial medication was safe and well tolerated. Prophylactic administration of itraconazole oral solution significantly reduces superficial fungal infection in patients with hematological malignancies and neutropenia. The incidence of proven systemic fungal infections, the number of deaths due to deep fungal infections, and the use of systemic antifungals tended to be lower in the itraconazole-treated group than in the amphotericin B-treated group, without statistical significance. Itraconazole oral solution is a broad-spectrum systemic antifungal agent with prophylactic activity in neutropenic patients, especially for those at high risk of prolonged neutropenia.     

侵袭性深部真菌感染45例临床和病原学分析

目的了解本院深部真菌感染的发病状况、病原菌特性及对常用抗真菌药的敏感度，为临床深部真菌感染的治疗药物选用提供依据。方法回顾性分析我院2004年1月1日12月31日血、无菌体腔液真菌培养阳性患者的病史，并对收集的病原菌进行体外药敏测定。结果根据诊断标准，确诊为深部真菌感染患者45例。其中社区获得性深部真菌感染22例，医院深部真菌感染23例。社区获得性深部真菌感染的部位以中枢神经系统最常见，共21例，占95．5％；其次为下呼吸道感染1例。医院深部真菌感染最常见的部位为血流感染，共15例，占65．2％；其次为中枢神经系统感染5例；下呼吸道感染2例；腹腔感染2例。社区获得性感染最常见的病原菌为新型隐球菌，共17株，占77．3％；其次为白念珠菌4株；烟曲霉1株。医院感染最常见的病原菌为白念珠菌，共8株；其次为其他念珠菌属。医院感染可能与住院天数较长、高龄、大手术、长时间应用广谱抗生素、深静脉置管等因素有关。结论我院2004年深部真菌感染确诊病例中，医院感染以白念珠菌所致的血流感染最常见；社区获得性感染以隐球菌性脑膜炎最多见。氟康唑仍是治疗敏感念珠菌属尤其是白念珠菌感染的有效药物。     

Current status and fluconazole treatment of pelvic fungal gynecological infections

The incidence of opportunistic fungal infections has recently been increasing in many clinical fields. Fluconazole is commonly used against systemic fungal infections. The present study was undertaken to investigate the current status and the efficacy of fluconazole in pelvic fungal gynecological infections. Thirty-eight patients aged 36-72 years old diagnosed with pelvic peritonitis with positive fungal culture in pelvic ascites were enrolled in this study and given fluconazole treatment. Forty-two pathogens were isolated from the 38 assessable patients. The predominant pathogen was Candida albicans with an incidence of 61.9% (26/42). Others included non-albicans Candida species amounting to 38.1% (16/42): 19.0% (8/42) Candida glabrata, 7.1% (3/42) Candida tropicalis, 7.1% (3/42) Candida parapsilosis and 4.8% (2/42) Candida krusei. The clinical cure rate at the end of fluconazole treatment was assessed as 30/38 (78.9%), and the fungal eradication rate as 26/42 (61.9%). Each rate was 29/38 (76.3%) and 26/42 (61.9%), respectively, at 1 week after the treatment, while the eradication rate of C. albicans and non-albicans species was 20/26 (76.9%) and 6/16 (37.5%), respectively. There was no adverse effect except for slight elevations of GOT, GPT and LDH observed in 1 patient (2.6%), which returned to normal after the treatment. It seems there may be an increasing trend of non-albicans species in pelvic fungal gynecological infection, against which fluconazole appears to be rather effective.     

Antifungal prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies: is there a real benefit?

Invasive fungal infections have been reported with an increasing incidence over the last 20 years. Fungal infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with hematological malignancies. Therefore, in neutropenic patients different regimens of antifungal prophylaxis have been performed for more than 20 years, but the effect of antifungal prophylaxis is controversial. A long duration of neutropenia, impaired cell-mediated immunity as well as continuous corticosteroid therapy and sustained immunosuppression for graft-versus-host disease in patients treated with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation are known risk factors for invasive mycosis. Since early diagnosis of invasive fungal infection is difficult, strategies to prevent fungal infections seem to be attractive. The introduction of triazoles have provided us with a better armamentarium to prevent fungal infections. In this review, the current strategies of antifungal prophylaxis are discussed. Antifungal prophylaxis has been effective in reducing candida infection, however, there has been no proven successful prevention of invasive aspergillosis. In addition, there is no clearly proven benefit of antifungal prophylaxis regarding the reduction in the overall mortality. Thus the best way to reduce invasive fungal-related mortality will be early diagnosis and preemptive therapeutic approaches.