Latent inhibition is not affected by acute or chronic administration of 6 mg/kg dl-amphetamine

Latent inhibition (LI) is a behavioral paradigm in which animals learn to ignore a repeatedly presented stimulus not followed by meaningful consequences. We previously reported that LI was disrupted following the administration of 1.5 mg/kg dl-amphetamine. The present experiments investigated the effects of 6 mg/kg dl-amphetamine administration on LI in a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure consisting of three stages: pre-exposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus, tone, was repeatedly presented without reinforcement; conditioning, in which the pre-exposed stimulus was paired with shock; and test, where LI was indexed by animals' suppression of licking during tone presentation. The three stages were conducted 24 h apart. In Experiment 1, the drug was administered in a 2×2 design, i.e. drug-no drug in pre-exposure and drug-no drug in conditioning. LI was obtained in all conditions. In Experiment 2, animals were given either 5 days of 6 mg/kg amphetamine pretreatment and amphetamine in pre-exposure and conditioning or 7 days of saline. LI was not obtained under amphetamine, but this outcome reflected a state-dependency effect. In Experiment 3, animals received either 5 days of amphetamine pretreatment and amphetamine in pre-exposure, conditioning and test or 8 days of saline. LI was obtained in both the placebo and amphetamine conditions. Experiments 4a and 4b compared the effects of two drug doses, 1.5 (4a) and 6 mg/kg (4b), administered in pre-exposure and conditioning. LI was abolished with the 1.5 mg/kg dose but not with the 6 mg/kg dose.     

Facilitation of latent inhibition by haloperidol in rats

Latent inhibition (LI) is a behavioral paradigm in which prior exposure to a stimulus not followed by reinforcement retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus when it is paired with reinforcement. Two experiments investigated the effects of 0.1 mg/kg haloperidol administration on LI as a function of number of CS pre-exposures. The investigation was carried out using a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure consisting of three stages: pre-exposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus, tone, was repeatedly presented without reinforcement; conditioning, in which the pre-exposed stimulus was paired with shock; and test, where LI was indexed by animals' suppression of licking during tone presentation. The three stages were conducted 24 h apart. In Experiment 1, 40 CS pre-exposures were given. LI was obtained in both the placebo and haloperidol conditions, but the effect was much more pronounced under the drug. Experiment 2 used ten CS pre-exposures. LI was not obtained in the placebo animals but was clearly evident in animals injected with haloperidol. The implications of these findings for the effects of neuroleptics on learning are discussed.     

The effects of the new antipsychotic, sertindole, on latent inhibition in rats

Latent inhibition (LI) is a measure of retarded conditioning to a previously presented non-reinforced stimulus, that is impaired in schizophrenic patients and in rats treated with amphetamine. Neuroleptic drugs are known to produce two effects in this paradigm: to antagonize amphetamine-induced disruption of LI, and to facilitate the development of LI when administered on their own. The present experiments tested the effects on LI of the new neuroleptic, sertindole. The experiments used a conditioned emotional response procedure in rats licking for water, consisting of three stages: pre-exposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus (a tone) was repeatedly presented without being followed by reinforcement; conditioning, in which the pre-exposed stimulus was paired with reinforcement (a foot shock); and test, in which LI was indexed by degree of suppression of licking during tone presentation. In Experiment 1 the effects of 0.31, 1.3 and 5.0mg/kg sertindole were assessed following pre-exposure to 40 non-reinforced tones. Experiment 2 tested the effects of 5mg/kg on LI following pre-exposure to 10 non-reinforced tones. Experiment 3 investigated antagonism of amphetamine-induced disruption of LI by 5.0mg/kg sertindole. The results demonstrated that sertindole (5.0mg/kg) possesses a neuroleptic-like profile in the LI model: it facilitates the development of LI and antagonizes amphetamine-induced disruption of LI.     

Facilitation of latent inhibition by the atypical antipsychotic risperidone

The action of the atypical antipsychotic risperidone on latent inhibition (LI), an animal model of schizophrenia, was investigated. The parameters of the procedure were set at values insufficient to generate LI in control rats. On the first day, rats administered 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mg/kg ip risperidone or vehicle were preexposed (PE) to 10 tone presentations. On the second day, they were again injected with drug or vehicle and then submitted to two conditioned stimulus (CS; tone)-unconditioned stimulus (US; shock) pairings. On the third day, suppression of their drinking response under the CS was measured. Nonpreexposed (NPE) animals were submitted to the same procedure except for the tone preexposure. On the suppression test, LI was not observed in control rats as well as in animals given 0.5 mg/kg risperidone. Animals given 1.0 and 2.0 mg risperidone, however, displayed an LI effect. The facilitation of LI by risperidone gives additional support to the LI paradigm as an animal model of schizophrenia.     

Antagonism of amphetamine-induced disruption of latent inhibition by the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine in rats

The present study aimed at characterising the effects of the new antipsychotic olanzapine in a Latent Inhibition (LI) paradigm. A conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure was used, consisting of three stages: pre-exposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus (a tone) was presented six times without being followed by reinforcement; conditioning, in which the pre-exposed stimulus was paired twice with reinforcement (a foot shock); and test, in which LI was assessed by the suppression of licking during the tone presentation. In Experiment I, it was found that pre-treatment with an intermediate dose (0.312mg/kg) of olanzapine, but not with lower (0.003; 0.031mg/kg) or higher doses (0.625; 1.25mg/kg), restored LI in amphetamine-treated (1.5mg/kg) animals. This effect could not be attributed to a disruptive effect of olanzapine on CER learning, as olanzapine per se had no effect on this conditioning (Experiment 2). In Experiment 3, olanzapine did not antagonise the amphetamine-induced locomotor hyperactivity. As olanzapine has not only dopaminergic, but also serotonergic, adrenergic, histaminergic and cholinergic activities, the differential effects of olanzapine on amphetamine-induced disruption of LI and hyperactivity may reflect an action on several pharmacological targets, possibly interacting with one another.     

Effects of clozapine on latent inhibition in the rat

In the present study we have examined the effect of clozapine, an atypical antipsychotic drug, on latent inhibition (LI) using the conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure. In this procedure, ten pre-exposures to the to-be-conditioned stimulus result in weak or no LI whereas 30 pre-exposures produce robust LI. Three different experimental protocols were used to study the effects of clozapine: facilitation of LI in animals subjected to ten pre-exposures to the to-be-conditioned stimulus; antagonism of the disruptive effect of amphetamine (1mg/kg, s.c.) on LI in animals receiving 30 pre-exposures; antagonism of the disruptive effect of nicotine (0.6mg/kg, s.c.) on LI in animals receiving 30 pre-exposures. High doses of clozapine (3 and 10mg/kg, s.c.) disrupted the CER in non pre-exposed animals. Despite this, clozapine significantly facilitated the development of LI at 1 and 10mg/kg and significantly attenuated the disruptive effects of nicotine at 0.3 and 1mg/kg and of amphetamine at 2 and 5mg/kg. These results demonstrate that clozapine is active in the LI model and further support the utility of this model in the study of mechanisms of action of antipsychotic drugs.     

Facilitation of the expression but not the acquisition of latent inhibition by haloperidol in rats

In the latent inhibition (LI) paradigm, nonreinforced preexposure to a stimulus retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus. The administration of haloperidol in both the preexposure and the conditioning stages was found to enhance LI in the conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure (Weiner and Feldon, 1986). The present experiments investigated the effects of 0.1 mg/kg haloperidol administration on LI in a two-way avoidance procedure, consisting of two stages: preexposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus, tone, was repeatedly presented without reinforcement; and conditioning, in which the animals acquired a two-way avoidance response with the tone serving as the warning signal. Experiments 1 and 2 tested whether the administration of haloperidol confirmed to the preexposure stage, where learning to ignore the nonreinforced stimulus takes place, would suffice to enhance the LI effect. In Experiment 1, preexposure and conditioning were conducted 24 hr apart. LI was obtained in both the placebo and haloperidol conditions, but the effect was not more pronounced under the drug. In addition, haloperidol-treated animals exhibited impaired avoidance performance. In Experiment 2, preexposure and conditioning were given 72 hr apart. With this interval, haloperidol did not affect avoidance performance. However, also under these conditions, the magnitude of the LI effect was not larger in the haloperidol-treated groups, indicating that the administration of the drug in the preexposure stage alone did not suffice to enhance LI.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Disruption of latent inhibition by acute administration of low doses of amphetamine

In the latent inhibition (LI) paradigm, nonreinforced preexposure to a stimulus retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus. Three experiments investigated the effects of acute amphetamine administration on LI in rats. Experiments 1 and 3 used a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure and Experiment 2 used two-way active avoidance procedure. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that, in both the CER and avoidance procedures, 1.5 mg/kg dl-amphetamine administered either in the preexposure or the conditioning stage alone did not disrupt LI. In contrast, amphetamine administered in both of the stages abolished LI. Experiment 3 showed that the abolition of LI was obtained when the preexposure and conditioning were given 24 hr apart but not when the two stages were given in one session.     

Predisposition to self-administer amphetamine: the contribution of response to novelty and prior exposure to the drug

 The present experiment examined the contribution of locomotor response to novelty and prior exposure to amphetamine to rats’ predisposition to self-administer a low dose of the drug. Rats were screened for their locomotor response to a novel environment and divided into high (HR) or low (LR) responders based on whether their locomotor scores were above or below the median activity level of the subject sample. Animals were then pre-exposed to nine daily injections of either saline (1 ml/kg, IP) or amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg, IP). Starting 1 week after pre-exposure, animals in the four different groups (HR pre-exposed to saline or amphetamine; LR pre-exposed to saline or amphetamine) were given the opportunity, in each of ten daily sessions, to lever press for a low dose of amphetamine (10 μg/kg per infusion) in a two lever (active versus inactive) continuous reinforcement operant task. Initial lever press performance revealed no difference in active versus inactive lever pressing between amphetamine and saline pre-exposed animals. However, in agreement with previous reports, with successive test sessions amphetamine pre-exposed rats maintained higher levels of active versus inactive lever pressing for drug while saline pre-exposed rats showed a progressive decrease in the pressing of either lever. Interestingly, this enhanced active lever pressing was observed in HR but not LR rats pre-exposed to amphetamine. In addition, HR saline pre-exposed animals showed initial active versus inactive lever pressing equivalent to that of HR amphetamine pretreated rats but this enhanced responding for drug diminished over days and by the last day of self-administration was indistinguishable from that of LR animals having been pre-exposed either to amphetamine or saline. These findings confirm that prior exposure to amphetamine promotes the subsequent self-administration of the drug and suggest that response to novelty may be a predictor more closely linked to an animal’s propensity to become sensitized to the facilitatory effects of the drug rather than to an animal’s current sensitization state and predisposition to self-administer the drug. Received: 6 July 1996 / Final version: 5 October 1996     

Systemic administration of MK-801 produces an abnormally persistent latent inhibition which is reversed by clozapine but not haloperidol

Abstract Rationale. Latent inhibition (LI) refers to retarded conditioning to a stimulus as a consequence of its inconsequential pre-exposure, and disrupted LI in the rat is considered to model an attentional deficit in schizophrenia. Blockade of NMDA receptor transmission, which produces behavioral effects potentially relevant to schizophrenic symptomatology in several animal models, has been reported to spare LI. Objectives. To show that systemic administration of the non-competitive NMDA antagonist MK-801 will lead to an abnormally persistent LI which will emerge under conditions that disrupt LI in controls, and that this will be reversed by the atypical neuroleptic clozapine but not by the typical neuroleptic haloperidol, as found for other NMDA antagonist-induced models. Methods. LI was measured in a thirst-motivated conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure by comparing suppression of drinking in response to a tone in rats which previously received 0 (non-pre-exposed) or 40 tone exposures (pre-exposed) followed by two (experiment 1) or five (experiments 2–5) tone – foot shock pairings. Results. MK-801 at doses of 0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg reduced conditioned suppression while no effect on suppression was seen at the 0.05 mg/kg dose. At the latter dose, intact LI was seen with parameters that produced LI in controls (40 pre-exposures and two conditioning trials). Raising the number of conditioning trials to five disrupted LI in control rats, but MK-801-treated rats continued to show LI, and this abnormally persistent LI was due to the action of MK-801 in the conditioning stage. MK-801-induced LI perseveration was unaffected by both haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) and clozapine (5 mg/kg) administered in conditioning, and was reversed by clozapine but not by haloperidol administered in pre-exposure. Conclusion. MK-801-induced perseveration of LI is consistent with other reports of perseverative behaviors, suggested to be particularly relevant to negative symptoms of schizophrenia, following NMDA receptor blockade. We suggest that LI perseveration may model impaired attentional set shifting associated with negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Moreover, the finding that the action of MK-801 on LI and the action of clozapine are exerted in different stages of the LI procedure suggests that the MK-801-based LI model may provide a unique screening tool for the identification of novel antipsychotic compounds, whereby the schizophrenia-mimicking LI abnormality is drug-induced, but the detection of the antipsychotic action is not dependent on the mechanism of action of the pro-psychotic drug. Electronic Publication     

Nicotine blocks latent inhibition in rats: evidence for a critical role of increased functional activity of dopamine in the mesolimbic system at conditioning rather than pre-exposure

Latent inhibition (LI) is a cognitive process whereby repeated exposure of a stimulus without consequence impedes the formation of subsequent associations with that stimulus. A number of studies in the rat have reported that LI is impaired by moderate systemic doses of amphetamine, an effect believed to be mediated via dopamine (DA) release in the nucleus accumbens. We and others have reported that nicotine has a selective effect in releasing DA in the accumbens rather than the caudate nucleus. We have therefore examined the ability of nicotine to disrupt LI, using a conditioned emotional response paradigm. Pre-exposure of a tone stimulus impaired subsequent conditioning between that stimulus and mild footshock, as indexed by suppression of licking by the tone subsequently presented alone. This LI effect was prevented, by an effect confined to the pre-exposed group, by doses of 0.4 or 0.6 mg/kg nicotine SC, which are accumbens selective, given before pre-exposure and before conditioning. The effect of nicotine in disrupting LI was prevented by prior administration of haloperidol at a dose (0.5 mg/kg) reported to reverse the disruptive effect of amphetamine on LI. Although the amphetamine effect requires two administrations, the effect of two administrations of nicotine was reproduced by a single dose of nicotine given before conditioning, but not by a single dose before pre-exposure. The results are discussed in relation to studies in human control and schizophrenic subjects, which suggest that increased DA activity in humans is also associated with impaired LI. The results indicate that nicotine does indeed increase functional DA activity in the rat accumbens; the consequent disruption of LI critically depends upon an action at the time of conditioning, and is independent of processes which occur during pre-exposure. In more general terms, this indicates the potential of drug experiments to complement behavioural studies on the mechanism of latent inhibition.     

Dopamine in nucleus accumbens: salience modulation in latent inhibition and overshadowing

Latent inhibition (LI) is demonstrated when non-reinforced pre-exposure to a to-be-conditioned stimulus retards later learning. Learning is similarly retarded in overshadowing, in this case using the relative intensity of competing cues to manipulate associability. Electrolytic/excitotoxic lesions to shell accumbens (NAc) and systemic amphetamine both reliably abolish LI. Here a conditioned emotional response procedure was used to demonstrate LI and overshadowing and to examine the role of dopamine (DA) within NAc. Experiment 1 showed that LI but not overshadowing was abolished by systemic amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg i.p.). In Experiment 2, 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) was used to lesion DA terminals within NAc: both shell- and core- (plus shell-)lesioned rats showed normal LI and overshadowing. Experiment 3 compared the effects of amphetamine microinjected at shell and core coordinates prior to conditioning: LI, but not overshadowing, was abolished by 10.0 but not 5.0 μg/side amphetamine injected in core but not shell NAc. These results suggest that the abolition of LI produced by NAc shell lesions is not readily reproduced by regionally restricted DA depletion within NAc; core rather than shell NAc mediates amphetamine-induced abolition of LI; overshadowing is modulated by different neural substrates.     

Phencyclidine does not disrupt latent inhibition in rats: implications for animal models of schizophrenia.

Latent inhibition (LI) is a behavioral paradigm in which prior exposure to a stimulus not followed by reinforcement retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus when it is paired with reinforcement. The development of LI reflects a process of learning to ignore, or tune out, irrelevant stimuli. Three experiments investigated the effects of phencyclidine (PCP) on LI. The investigation was carried out using a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure consisting of three stages: preexposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus, tone, was repeatedly presented without reinforcement; conditioning, in which the preexposed stimulus was paired with shock; and test, where LI was indexed by animals' suppression of licking during tone presentation. The three stages were conducted 24 h apart. In Experiment 1, 1 mg/kg PCP was administered either in the preexposure or in the conditioning stage or in both. Experiment 2 used 5 mg/kg PCP in the same procedure. In Experiment 3, 5 mg/kg PCP was administered throughout the LI procedure, including the test stage. In all three experiments, PCP did not affect LI. The implications of these findings for the development of animal models of schizophrenia are discussed.     

The sigma ligand BMY-14802 as a potential antipsychotic: evidence from the latent inhibition model in rats

Latent inhibition (LI) is a measure of retarded conditioning to a previously-presented nonreinforced stimulus, that is impaired in schizophrenic patients and in rats treated with amphetamine. Neuroleptic drugs are known to produce two effects in this test paradigm: to antagonise amphetamine-induced disruption of LI, and to enhance LI when administered on their own. The present experiments tested the effects on LI of a potential antipsychotic, sigma ligand BMY-14802. The experiments used a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure in rats licking for water, consisting of three stages: preexposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus (a tone) was repeatedly presented without being followed by reinforcement; conditioning, in which the preexposed stimulus was paired with reinforcement (a foot shock); and test, in which LI was indexed by animals' degree of suppression of licking during tone presentation. In Experiment 1, 20 tone preexposures and two conditioning trials were given and the effects of 5, 15, and 30mg/kg BMY-14802 were assessed. Experiment 2 tested the effects of 15 and 30mg/kg on LI using ten preexposures and two conditioning trials. Experiment 3 investigated the effects of 15 and 30mg/kg on LI using 40 preexposures and extended conditioning consisting of five tone-shock pairings. Experiments 4 and 5 investigated antagonism of amphetamine-induced disruption of LI by 15 and 30mg/kg BMY-14802, respectively. BMY-14802 was found to antagonise amphetamine-induced disruption of LI and enhance LI when low numbers of preexposures and two conditioning trials were given, but not following extended conditioning. These results provide partial support for the suggestion that BMY-14802 may possess antipsychotic properties.     

Abolition of the acquisition but not the expression of latent inhibition by chlordiazepoxide in rats

In the latent inhibition (LI) paradigm, prior nonreinforced exposure to a stimulus retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus when it is paired with reinforcement. The development of LI reflects learning not to attend to, or ignore, stimuli which predict no significant consequences. The present experiment tested the effects of chlordiazepoxide (CDP) on LI using a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure consisting of three stages given 24 hr apart: preexposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus, tone, was presented without reinforcement; conditioning, in which the preexposed stimulus was paired with shock; and test, where LI was indexed by animals' suppression of licking during tone presentation. Preexposure and conditioning were given off-baseline. CDP (5 mg/kg) was administered only in preexposure, only in conditioning, in both stages or in neither. The administration of the drug during tone-shock conditioning conducted off-baseline markedly reduced animals' suppression to the tone in a subsequent licking test which was conducted without the drug. The administration of CDP during nonreinforced preexposure to the tone abolished the development of LI, i.e., drug-treated preexposed animals did not show reduced suppression as compared to drug-treated nonpreexposed animals. These results demonstrate that CDP: a) blocks the acquisition of classically conditioned fear and b) disrupts animals' ability to learn that stimuli predict no significant outcomes.     

Long-term attentional deficit in nonhandled males: possible involvement of the dopaminergic system

Latent inhibition (LI) is a behavioral paradigm in which nonreinforced pre-exposure to a stimulus retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus. The development of LI is considered to reflect learning not to attend to, or ignore, irrelevant stimuli. In our previous studies investigating the effects of early handling on LI, we have shown that normal LI was obtained in handled males and females, as well as in nonhandled females. In contrast, nonhandled males failed to show LI. This finding pointed to a long-term attentional deficit in nonhandled males. Since there is evidence that the development of LI is mediated by the dopaminergic system, the present experiments tested the possibility that the attentional deficit of nonhandled males may be related to a dopaminergic dysfunction. Experiment 1 tested whether the administration of haloperidol, which was shown to enhance LI in normal animals, would reinstate the LI effect in nonhandled males. Infantile handled (Days 1–22) and nonhandled male and female rats were tested in maturity in the LI paradigm, using a conditioned emotional response procedure. Experiment 2 tested the locomotor response of handled and nonhandled males to 0.3, 1 and 2.5 mg/kg d-amphetamine. Experiment 1 showed that handled males, handled females and nonhandled females showed a normal LI effect, whereas nonhandled males failed to develop LI. Haloperidol enhanced LI in all the groups, but this effect was most dramatic in nonhandled males, in which the drug reinstated LI. Experiment 2 showed that nonhandled males exhibited a reduced locomotor response to d-amphetamine.     

Amphetamine-induced disruptions of latent inhibition are reinforcer mediated: implications for animal models of schizophrenic attentional dysfunction

Latent inhibition (LI) is a phenomenon observed when repeated, non-reinforced presentation of a stimulus results in a retardation of subsequent conditioning to that stimulus. Several recent experiments have suggested that LI is abolished in conditioned suppression paradigms following acute, low doses of amphetamine given during pre-exposure and conditioning. Experiment 1 sought to increase the generality of this finding in an appetitive LI paradigm, using a dose of amphetamine previously shown to disrupt the LI effect in an aversive paradigm (Killcross and Robbins 1993). However, no evidence for any disruption of LI was found. Experiment 2 extended this investigation to additional, higher doses ofd-amphetamine, and also examined the role of reinforcer magnitude in the effect. A non-significant trend towards an attenuated LI effect was found, which was reversed by decreases in the concentration of the sucrose reinforcer. Experiments 3 and 4 investigated the influence of systemic amphetamine in aversive paradigms, with specific attention to the increased response to the aversive footshock reinforcer found in amphetamine-treated animals. These experiments revealed that the influence of amphetamine on the LI effect in conditioned suppression paradigms could be reversed by reducing the intensity of footshock used in conditioning, thereby paralleling the effect found in the appetitive paradigm. Therefore it is unlikely that a simple attentional account of the abolition of the LI effect in previous experiments can be sustained.     

Calcium dependence of sensitised dopamine release in rat nucleus accumbens following amphetamine challenge: implications for the disruption of latent inhibition

Repeated amphetamine treatment results in sensitisation both of its behavioural effects, and of its dopamine (DA)-releasing effects on which the former largely depend. Understanding the nature of the sensitised response may help to explain behaviours which emerge only with repeated treatment, such as particular stereotypies and effects on social behaviour in animals, and links between these effects and the emergence of dependence and psychotic symptoms in humans. We show here that a single pretreatment with amphetamine (1mg/kg) is sufficient to sensitise the locomotor response to amphetamine challenge (1mg/kg) 24h later. We have used in vivo microdialysis in the nucleus accumbens in unrestrained rats to demonstrate a corresponding potentiation in the DA response; the marked increase in accumbens dialysate DA following amphetamine (to 427% of basal) was significantly potentiated (to 675% of basal) by the pretreatment, without any alteration in the basal DA. There was also no change in the expected reduction in DA metabolites. Replacement of perfusate calcium by magnesium left the response to acute amphetamine challenge substantially unaffected, as expected from previous reports; however, the potentiation of the DA response by amphetamine pretreatment was prevented. Similarly the potentiated response was attenuated by administration of ondansetron, a 5HT-3 antagonist, (0.01mg/kg) before each amphetamine treatment. The ability of amphetamine to disrupt latent inhibition (L1), which is also disrupted in acute schizophrenia, has been suggested to provide a model of schizophrenia linking underlying cognitive deficits with the DA theory of the disorder. Since LI is disrupted by two systemic administrations of amphetamine 24h apart, but not by one, the present results are consistent with the concept that it is the calcium, and hence impulse, dependence of increased accumbal DA release, rather than its magnitude, which is critical for the disruption of LI.     

Reduced dopamine function within the medial shell of the nucleus accumbens enhances latent inhibition

Latent inhibition (LI) manifests as poorer conditioning to a CS that has previously been presented without consequence. There is some evidence that LI can be potentiated by reduced mesoaccumbal dopamine (DA) function but the locus within the nucleus accumbens of this effect is as yet not firmly established. Experiment 1 tested whether 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-induced lesions of DA terminals within the core and medial shell subregions of the nucleus accumbens (NAc) would enhance LI under conditions that normally disrupt LI in controls (weak pre-exposure). LI was measured in a thirst motivated conditioned emotional response procedure with 10 pre-exposures (to a noise CS) and 2 conditioning trials. The vehicle-injected and core-lesioned animals did not show LI and conditioned to the pre-exposed CS at comparable levels to the non-pre-exposed controls. 6-OHDA lesions to the medial shell, however, produced potentiation of LI, demonstrated across two extinction tests. In a subsequent experiment, haloperidol microinjected into the medial shell prior to conditioning similarly enhanced LI. These results underscore the dissociable roles of core and shell subregions of the NAc in mediating the expression of LI and indicate that reduced DA function within the medial shell leads to enhanced LI.     

The "two-headed" latent inhibition model of schizophrenia: modeling positive and negative symptoms and their treatment

Rationale Latent inhibition (LI), namely, poorer performance on a learning task involving a previously pre-exposed non-reinforced stimulus, is disrupted in the rat by the dopamine (DA) releaser amphetamine which produces and exacerbates psychotic (positive) symptoms, and this is reversed by treatment with typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs (APDs) which on their own potentiate LI. These phenomena are paralleled by disrupted LI in normal amphetamine-treated humans, in high schizotypal humans, and in schizophrenia patients in the acute stages of the disorder, as well as by potentiated LI in normal humans treated with APDs. Consequently, disrupted LI is considered to provide an animal model of positive symptoms of schizophrenia with face, construct and predictive validity. Objectives To review most of the rodent data on the neural substrates of LI as well as on the effects of APDs on this phenomenon with an attempt to interpret and integrate these data within the framework of the switching model of LI; to show that there are two distinct LI models, disrupted and abnormally persistent LI; to relate these findings to the clinical condition. Results The nucleus accumbens (NAC) and its DA innervation form a crucial component of the neural circuitry of LI, and are involved at the conditioning stage. There is a clear functional differentiation between the NAC shell and core subregions whereby damage to the shell disrupts LI and damage to the core renders LI abnormally persistent under conditions that disrupt LI in normal rats. The effects of shell and core lesions parallel those produced by lesions to the major sources of input to the NAC: entorhinal cortex lesion, like shell lesion, disrupts LI, whereas hippocampal lesion, like core lesion, produces persistent LI with changes in context, and basolateral amygdala (BLA) lesion, like core lesion, produces persistent LI with extended conditioning. Systemically induced blockade of glutamatergic as well as DA transmission produce persistent LI via effects exerted at the conditioning stage, whereas enhancement of DA transmission disrupts LI via effects at the conditioning stage. Serotonergic manipulations can disrupt or potentiate LI via effects at the pre-exposure stage. Both typical and atypical APDs potentiate LI via effects at conditioning whereas atypical APDs in addition disrupt LI via effects at pre-exposure. Schizophrenia patients can exhibit disrupted or normal LI as a function of the state of the disorder (acute versus chronic), as well as persistent LI. Conclusions Different drug and lesion manipulations produce two poles of abnormality in LI, namely, disrupted LI under conditions which lead to LI in normal rats, and abnormally persistent LI under conditions which disrupt it in normal rats. Disrupted and persistent LI are differentially responsive to APDs, with the former reversed by both typical and atypical APDs and the latter selectively reversed by atypical APDs. It is suggested that this "two-headed LI model" mimics two extremes of deficient cognitive switching seen in schizophrenia, excessive and retarded switching between associations, mediated by dysfunction of different brain circuitries, and can serve to model positive symptoms of schizophrenia and typical antipsychotic action, as well as negative symptoms of schizophrenia and atypical antipsychotic action.