Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the correction of high myopia

PURPOSE: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) in the treatment of high myopia. SETTING: Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, and Balgeunsesang Ophthalmology Clinic, Seoul, South Korea. METHODS: Four hundred seventy eyes of 240 patients with manifest refraction spherical components greater than -6.00 diopters (D) were assigned to 2 groups: 324 eyes (167 patients) were treated with LASIK and 146 eyes (73 patients), with LASEK. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), remaining refractive error, corneal haze, and complications were followed in both groups for 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, the mean spherical equivalent (SE) was within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia in 205 eyes (63.3%) in the LASIK group and 81 eyes (55.5%) in the LASEK group and within +/-1.00 D in 261 eyes (80.6%) and 104 eyes (71.2%), respectively. The UCVA was 20/25 or better in 269 LASIK eyes (83.0%) and 111 LASEK eyes (76.0%). There was more than a 1-line loss of BSCVA in 4 LASIK eyes (1.2%) and 21 LASEK eyes (14.3%). The between-group differences in SE, magnitude of cylinder, UCVA, and haze were statistically significant (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both LASIK and LASEK were safe and effectively treated eyes with high myopia. Laser in situ keratomileusis provided superior results in visual predictability and corneal opacity.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: visual outcomes and complications

PURPOSE: To compare the visual outcomes and complications of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with those of surface treatment by laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK), photorefractive keratectomy with mechanical epithelial removal (M-PRK), and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK). SETTING: Tertiary care eye center. METHODS: This retrospective review comprised all cases of LASIK, LASEK, M-PRK, and T-PRK performed at King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital between July 1, 2004, and June 30, 2005. Separate statistical analyses were performed for eyes with low to moderate myopia (spherical equivalent [SE] less than -6.00 diopters [D]) and high myopia (SE -6.00 to -11.25 D). RESULTS: Of 696 eyes that met the inclusion criteria, 464 had LASIK, 104 had LASEK, 69 had M-PRK, and 59 had T-PRK. Eyes with low to moderate myopia had a statistically significantly smaller mean difference between logMAR final postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) after T-PRK and M-PRK than after LASIK or LASEK. A higher percentage of eyes with high myopia had a final UCVA within +/-2 lines of the preoperative BSCVA with T-PRK than with LASIK, LASEK, or M-PRK. There were more major non-flap-related complications after LASEK than after LASIK, M-PRK, or T-PRK. CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with low to moderate myopia, T-PRK and M-PRK provided slightly better visual outcomes than LASIK or LASEK. In eyes with high myopia, T-PRK provided better visual outcomes than LASIK, LASEK, and M-PRK. Laser in situ keratomileusis was associated with the most major postoperative complications.     

Prospective, paired comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia less than -6.00 diopters

PURPOSE: To compare visual and refractive results, contrast sensitivity, and tear stability after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in one eye and laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) in the fellow eye for low myopia. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with low myopia, with a maximum difference of 1 D between their two eyes, were randomly assigned to receive LASEK on one eye and LASIK on the other eye. A total of 64 eyes of 32 patients with a mean age of 26.83 +/- 5.33 years were included in the study. Preoperative myopia ranged from -1.00 to -6.00 D. Follow-up was 6 to 12 months. Uncorrected (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), Schirmer test results, tear break-up time, corneal asphericity, corneal uniformity index, predicted corneal acuity, and contrast sensitivity values were compared with preoperative values. A Wilcoxon test was used for statistical comparisons and a P-value less than .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: At 6 months after surgery, there was no statistically significant difference in UCVA, BSCVA, spherical and cylindrical refractive error, Schirmer test, or tear break-up time between groups. Contrast sensitivity values in the LASIK eyes were lower in comparison to preoperative values, but there was no change in the LASEK group. CONCLUSIONS: Based on 6-month results, LASEK for low myopia was safe and effective with predictable results, offered early refractive stability, and may be considered an alternative for LASIK.     

Results of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of -10 to -19 diopters with a Technolas 217 laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness, predictability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia greater than -10.00 D. METHODS: Sixty-five eyes of 37 patients with myopia greater than -10.00 D underwent LASIK. Patients were evaluated on day 1, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Parameters evaluated were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), residual refractive error, regression of correction, and presence of any complication. RESULTS: Mean preoperative BSCVA was 0.745 +/- 0.234, which improved to 0.8070 +/- 0.237 postoperatively. The average preoperative UCVA was 0.022 +/- 0.02; postoperative UCVA at 6 months was 0.536 +/- 0.255. UCVA of 20/40 or better was achieved in 58% (38 eyes) and 20/20 or better in 26% (17 eyes). The average refractive error before LASIK was -12.64 +/- 2.16 D (range -10.00 to -19.00 D). Mean residual refractive error 1 week following LASIK was -0.63 +/- 1.36 D, which regressed to a mean -1.78 +/- 2.08 D at the end of 6 months. Nineteen eyes (29%) were within +/-0.50 D of intended refractive correction. CONCLUSION: LASIK was partially effective in the correction of high myopia. An initial overcorrection may be programmed to offset the effect of refractive regression.     

Ten-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of up to -10 diopters

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia of up to -10 diopters (D). DESIGN: A long-term (10-year) follow-up retrospective, interventional case series. METHODS: The study included 97 eyes of 70 patients with a preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) of up to -10 D treated with myopic LASIK at the Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain, using the VISX 20/20 excimer laser (Santa Clara, California, USA) and the Automated Corneal Shaper microkeratome (Chiron Vision, Irvine, California, USA). All patients were evaluated three months, one year, two years, five years, and 10 years after surgery. The main outcome measures were refractive predictability and stability, mean corneal keratometry, topographical cylinder, safety, efficacy, stability of visual acuity, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: At 10 years, 71 (73%) of 97 eyes were within +/- 1.00 D and 89 (92%) were within +/- 2.00 D. Twenty eyes (20.8%) underwent retreatments because of overcorrection, undercorrection, regression, or both. The mean SE slightly decreased (myopic regression) over 10 years, with a mean myopic regression of -0.12 +/- 0.16 D per year. Fifty-four (54.6%) of 97 eyes demonstrated an increase in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) after 10 years. No eye developed corneal ectasia in the long-term, and only three eyes lost more than two lines of BSCVA because of complications that were not attributable to the LASIK procedure. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK for myopia of up to -10 D is a safe and effective procedure with slight myopic regression that slows down with time and a high rate of BSCVA increase in the long-term.     

激光角膜上皮瓣下磨镶术和激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗中高度近视的对比研究

目的比较激光角膜瓣下磨镶术(LASEK)和激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)治疗中高度近视的临床效果. 方法中高度近视患者198例(394只眼).其中LASEK手术治疗93例(184只眼), LASIK手术治疗105例(210只眼). 结果术后1天,LASIK 组28 %裸眼视力达到1.0,LASEK组无1例裸眼视力达到1.0.术后1周、1、3、6月裸眼视力大于或等于1.0者,两组比较差异无显著性 (P=0.36,P=0.58,P=0.44,P=0.64).角膜地形图分析平均角膜中央屈光力与周边屈光力的差异,LASEK组(0.69)明显小于LASIK组(2.62).结论 LASEK手术矫正中高度近视均有良好的治疗效果,是一种安全、有效、预测性好的屈光手术.     

Comparison between LASEK with mitomycin C and LASIK for the correction of myopia of -7.00 to -13.75 D

PURPOSE: To compare laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) and LASIK for the correction of high myopia. METHODS: A prospective, single-masked study was conducted. Patients treated with LASEK to correct myopia > or = -7.00 diopters (D) (spherical equivalent manifest refraction) with a cylinder < or = -3.50 D (LASEK group) were compared to patients treated with LASIK (LASIK group) using the same excimer laser (Technolas 217C). Mitomycin C (MMC) 0.02% was applied for 1 minute in all LASEK-treated eyes. RESULTS: A total of 228 consecutive eyes were included in the study (114 in each group, matched for preoperative refraction). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent manifest refraction was -8.72 +/- 1.20 D in the LASEK group and -8.74 +/- 1.20 D in the LASIK group (range: -7.00 to -13.75 D) (P = .9). Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was significantly lower in LASEK eyes 1, 7, and 30 days postoperatively (P = .0001 for each comparison). No significant differences were found at 3 months postoperatively in UCVA (P = .3), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) (P = .2), or in the safety (P = .6) and efficacy (P = .8) indices. Uncorrected visual acuity was 1.0 or better in 34.2% of LASEK eyes and 44.7% of LASIK eyes. Spherical refraction was +0.25 +/- 0.6 D after LASEK and -0.06 +/- 0.5 D after LASIK (P = .0001). Sixty-eight percent of LASEK eyes and 79% of LASIK eyes were within +/- 0.50 D of intended refraction. No LASEK eye versus 7 LASIK eyes lost 2 lines of BSCVA. Eight LASEK eyes gained 2 or more lines of BSCVA versus 1 LASIK eye. CONCLUSIONS: Visual improvement after LASEK with intraoperative MMC was significantly slower than after LASIK. Visual outcomes (UCVA, BSCVA, and safety and efficacy indices) 3 months after surgery were similar with both techniques for the correction of high myopia. Ten percent more eyes after LASIK were within +/- 0.50 D of intended refraction.     

Surface ablation after laser in situ keratomileusis: retreatment on the flap

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of superficial laser ablation on the flap as a treatment for residual ametropia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Private practice refractive surgery center, Utrecht, The Netherlands. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised 18 eyes of 15 patients who had alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) retreatment for residual ametropia after LASIK. All patients who had retreatment on the flap between June 2004 and June 2005 were included in the study. Retreatments were performed by wavefront-guided excimer laser surface ablation using the Visx Star S4 laser. Outcome measures included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), subjective refraction, and biomicroscopy at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative visits. RESULTS: The preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) refraction was -0.63 diopter (D) +/- 0.87 (SD) (range -2.00 to +1.38 D). The mean amount of ablated cornea was 21.3 +/- 7.4 microm. At 3 months, the mean UCVA was 0.83 +/- 1.5 lines (range 0.40 to 1.25), yielding an efficacy index of 0.87. At 6 months, the mean UCVA increased to 0.98 +/- 0.8 line (range 0.63 to 1.25) and the efficacy index, to 1.03. At 12 months, 6 eyes were lost to follow-up. The mean UCVA was 0.83 +/- 2.2 lines (range 0.20 to 1.25), with an efficacy index of 0.87. The mean BSCVA was 0.98 +/- 0.9 line (range 0.80 to 1.25) at 3 months and 1.05 +/- 0.6 line (range 0.80 to 1.25) at 6 months, yielding a safety index of 1.03 and 1.11, respectively. At 12 months, the mean BSCVA was 0.95 +/- 1.0 line (range 0.63 to 1.25), with a safety index of 1.0. At 6 months, no eye had lost lines of BSCVA, 11 eyes had no change, and 7 eyes gained 1 line. At 12 months, 2 eyes lost 1 line of BSCVA, 8 eyes had no change, and 2 eyes gained 1 line. The mean SE refraction was +0.10 +/- 0.27 D (range -0.25 to +0.63 D) at 3 months, +0.06 +/- 0.37 D (range -0.50 to +1.13 D) at 6 months, and +0.15 +/- 0.39 D (range -0.50 to +0.88 D) at 12 months. On biomicroscopic examination, 1 eye had prolonged grade 1 haze that disappeared before 6 months. Two eyes of 1 patient who had hyperopic retreatment developed late-onset haze 8 months postoperatively. Eyes with microstriae in the flap before retreatment showed significant improvement after retreatment. There were no sight-threatening complications. CONCLUSION: Wavefront-guided LASEK or alcohol-assisted PRK retreatment on the surface of a LASIK flap was safe and effective in correcting small amounts of residual myopia.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Mater Private Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 22 eyes of 20 patients had LASEK retreatment for residual refractive errors after LASIK. All patients who had the procedure between January 2004 and May 2007 were included in the study. The main outcome measures at the final follow-up visit were efficacy, predictability, safety, and stability. RESULTS: The mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -4.50 diopters (D)+/-2.88 (SD) (range -10.00 to +3.87 D) before LASIK and -1.23+/-0.95 D (range -2.50 to +2.00 D) after LASIK. The mean time between the initial LASIK procedure and LASEK enhancement was 56.2+/-24.3 months (range 6 to 84 months). The mean follow-up after retreatment was 6.68+/-6.47 months (range 3 to 24 months). At the final follow-up visit, 19 eyes (86.4%) had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/30 or better and 17 eyes (77.3%) were within +/-1.00 D of the target refraction. No patient lost more than 1 line of best corrected visual acuity or developed corneal haze greater than grade 1. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that LASEK retreatment after LASIK is a safe and effective alternative when LASIK retreatment is deemed unsafe because there is not sufficient residual corneal stromal bed or when retreatment is required many years after LASIK and relifting the original flap is expected to be problematic.     

Effect of preoperative keratometry on refractive outcomes after laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of preoperative keratometry on the refractive outcome after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia. SETTING: University Eye Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the records of patients who had LASIK for myopia greater than -6.0 diopters (D) using the Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper and the Schwind Keratome-F excimer laser were reviewed. RESULTS: Laser in situ keratomileusis was performed in 167 eyes of 103 patients (mean age 34.7 years +/- 7.5 [SD]). Preoperative myopic spherical equivalent (SE) refraction was -9.0 +/- 2.0 D (range -6.0 to -13.9 D). Three months after surgery, SE refraction was -0.04 +/- 1.1 D (range +2.3 to -3.3 D); uncorrected visual acuity > or = 20/40 was present in 91.8% of 110 eyes in which emmetropia was the postoperative goal. Mean preoperative keratometry was 43.9 +/- 1.5 D (range 40.3 to 48.1 D). When eyes were stratified by the degree of preoperative myopia in 1.0 D steps, a trend toward greater undercorrection was noted in eyes with preoperative keratometry < 43.5 D than in those with steeper keratometry (> 44.5 D) in all myopia groups except the -7.0 to -7.9 D group. This difference was statistically significant in eyes with a preoperative SE of -10.0 to -10.9 D and -11.0 to -11.9 D. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative keratometry appeared to influence the refractive outcome after myopic LASIK. Eyes with flatter corneas tended to have greater undercorrection than eyes with similar myopia and steeper corneas. Validation of these findings in larger data sets using the methodology described may improve the predictability of current LASIK nomograms, particularly in eyes with high myopia.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and compound myopic astigmatism using the Technolas 217 scanning-spot laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, predictability, and visual results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using the Bausch & Lomb Technolas(R) 217 scanning-spot laser for the treatment of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism. SETTING: Stanford Eye Laser Center, Stanford, California, USA. METHODS: In a prospective study, 110 eyes of 58 patients with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) of -4.87 diopters (D) +/- 2.5 (SD) (range -1.0 to -11.4 D) had LASIK for myopia and compound myopic astigmatism using the Technolas 217 scanning-spot laser. The primary outcome variables included preoperative and postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), achieved versus attempted correction, vector analysis of astigmatism, and complications. RESULTS: One hundred ten eyes were available for analysis at 3 months. The mean SE refraction was reduced 95% (mean -0.23 +/- 0.4 D), and astigmatism was reduced 70% (mean 0.28 +/- 0.3 D). One day postoperatively, 100% of eyes had a UCVA of 20/40 or better, 96% had 20/25 or better, 77% had 20/20 or better, and 39% had 20/15 or better. At the 3-month examination, 100% of eyes had a UCVA of 20/40 or better, 95% had 20/25 or better, 83% had 20/20 or better, and 48% had 20/15 or better. Ninety percent of eyes were within +/-0.5 D of emmetropia. No eye lost 2 or more lines of BSCVA. CONCLUSIONS: The Technolas 217 scanning-spot laser produced excellent postoperative UCVA and BSCVA. It was predictable, safe, and effective for the treatment of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess the stability of the procedure.     

Ten-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for high myopia. DESIGN: A long-term (10 years) follow-up retrospective interventional case series study. METHODS: The study included 196 myopic eyes of 118 patients with a mean preoperative spherical equivalent of -13.95 +/- 2.79 diopter (D) treated with myopic LASIK at the Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante, Spain using the VISX 20/20 excimer laser (VISX Inc, Santa Monica, California, USA) and the Automated Corneal Shaper microkeratome (Chiron Vision, Irvine, California, USA). All patients were evaluated three months, one year, two years, five years, and 10 years postoperatively. The main outcome measures were refractive predictability and stability, mean corneal keratometry, topographical cylinder, safety, efficacy, stability of visual acuity, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: At 10 years, 82 (42%) of 196 eyes were within +/-1.00 D and 119 (61%) were within +/-2.00 D. Fifty-four (27.5%) eyes underwent retreatments attributable to under correction and/or regression. The myopic regression decreases with time in eyes that did not undergo retreatment with a mean rate of -0.25 +/- 0.18 D per year. Eleven eyes (5%) lost more than 2 lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and 78 eyes (40%) showed a postoperatively uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. Two eyes (1%) with more than 15 D myopic correction developed corneal ectasia. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK for myopia over -10 D is a safe procedure with myopic regression that slows down with time and a high rate of BSCVA increase in the long-term.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for compound myopic astigmatism using the Meditec MEL 70 G-Scan excimer laser

PURPOSE: To determine the safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in treating patients with myopic astigmatism using the Meditec MEL 70 G-Scan excimer laser. METHODS: Seventy-four eyes of 42 patients with myopia ranging from -4.50 to -9.88 D and astigmatism ranging from 0.50 to 4.00 D who underwent LASIK with the Meditec MEL 70 G-Scan excimer laser and the Summit Krumeich-Barraquer microkeratome were studied. Patients were followed for 1 year. RESULTS: Mean baseline spherical equivalent refraction was -7.12 +/- 1.70 D and cylinder was 1.62 +/- 1.72 D. At 12 months, mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -0.49 +/- 0.57 D and mean refractive cylinder was 0.59 +/- 0.32 D. Mean change in spherical equivalent refraction between 1 and 12 months after surgery was -0.09 +/- 0.31 D, toward myopia. At baseline, no eyes had best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) of 20/20 or better, and 65% had 20/40 or better. At 12 months after surgery, 10% of eyes had BSCVA of 20/20 or better and 88% of eyes had 20/40 or better. The unusually low postoperative BSCVA results were thought to be due to amblyopia or existence of a higher percentage of some optical aberrations in this group of eyes. Mean uncorrected visual acuity was -1.38 +/- 0.42 LogMAR units (20/400) at baseline and -0.29 +/- 0.25 LogMAR units (20/40) at the 12-month postoperative examination. No eyes lost two or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity. No vision threatening complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK with the Meditec MEL 70 G-Scan excimer laser appeared to be safe, effective, reasonably predictable, and stable for correction of myopic astigmatism with a spherical component between -4.25 and -8.25 D and a cylindrical component between 0.50 and 4.00 D. However, astigmatism was slightly undercorrected with the algorithm used.     

Recovery of uncorrected visual acuity after laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy for low myopia

PURPOSE: To compare uncorrected visual acuity and refractive error in patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) between 1 week and 6 months after surgery. METHODS: All eyes underwent PRK or LASIK with the VisX StarS2 excimer laser. We retrospectively analyzed data from 77 random eyes of 77 patients in the PRK group and 76 eyes of 76 patients in the LASIK group. All eyes had a low myopic refractive error (spherical equivalent range, -0.88 diopters (D) to -5.13 D; mean PRK. -2.8 +/- 0.20 D: LASIK, -2.5 +/- 0.22 D). Uncorrected visual acuity and manifest refractive error were evaluated 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Each eye undergoing PRK was paired with an eye undergoing LASIK for a similar level of spherical equivalent. Mean uncorrected visual acuity after 1 week was 0.85 +/- 0.06 (20/25, logMAR 0.12 +/- 0.04) for the PRK group and 1.01 +/- 0.06 (20/20, logMAR 0.01 +/- 0.03) for the LASIK group (p < 0.001). Mean spherical equivalent after 1 week was 0.23 +/- 0.12 D for the PRK group and -0.02 +/- 0.07 D for the LASIK group (p = 0.02). Mean uncorrected visual acuity after 1 month was 1.03 +/- 0.05 (20/20, logMAR 0.02 +/- 0.03) for the PRK group and 1.05 +/- 0.05 (20/20. -0.02 +/- 0.03) for the LASIK group (p = 0.16). Mean spherical equivalent after I month was 0.19 +/- 0.10 D for the PRK group and -0.02 +/- 0.09 D for the LASIK group. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.02), but was unlikely to be clinically significant. Mean uncorrected visual acuity after 6 months was 1.05 +/- 0.06 (20/20, logMAR -0.01 +/- 0.03) for the PRK group and 1.06 +/- 0.05 (20/20, logMAR -0.14 +/- 0.03) for the LASIK group (p = 0.41). Mean spherical equivalent after 6 months was 0.02 +/- 0.08 D for the PRK group and 0.00 +/- 0.08 D for the LASIK group (p = 0.35). CONCLUSION: Uncorrected visual acuity 1 week after surgery is significantly better in eyes undergoing LASIK than in eyes undergoing PRK. Both procedures provide functional vision by 1 week after surgery. The difference does not relate to refractive error, which was similar between the two groups, but to differences in healing of the epithelium. By 1 month after surgery, there is no difference in mean uncorrected visual acuity between eyes that undergo PRK or LASIK for low myopia.     

Nomogram adjustment of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism with the Alcon LADARVision system

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual and refractive results of conventional (non-wavefront) laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism using the Alcon LADARVision 4000 excimer laser system and nomogram adjustment techniques. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 499 eyes that had LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism was performed. Preoperative manifest spherical equivalent refraction ranged from -0.43 to -6.00 D and preoperative astigmatism ranged from 0 to -4.75 D. Patients were evaluated during 3 months following surgery. RESULTS: One month after surgery, 72% of eyes examined (298/415 eyes) had uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better. Three months after surgery, 83% of eyes examined (216/261 eyes) had UCVA of 20/20 or better. One and three months after surgery, 82% and 83% of eyes, respectively, were within +/-0.50 D of attempted correction; 97% of eyes were within +/-1.00 D at both 1 and 3 months. No eye lost more than 1 line of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) at 3 months after surgery. At the 3-month examination, 83% of eyes had UCVA better than or equal to preoperative BSCVA. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional LASIK to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism was safe and effective using the Alcon LADARVision 4000 excimer laser system. Outcomes were substantially improved throughout development of an accurate nomogram, derived from continually updated regression analysis of previous refractive results.     

Enhancement outcomes after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis using topographically guided excimer laser photoablation

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topographically guided excimer laser photoablation to retreat unsuccessful myopic and hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Eye Clinic, San Salvatore Hospital, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy. METHODS: At least 3 months after primary PRK (Group A) or primary LASIK (Group B), 48 eyes of 42 patients were submitted to PRK or LASIK enhancements. The eyes were treated with an excimer laser linked to a computerized videokeratography unit with a topographically supported customized ablation workstation. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 27.8 months +/- 8.2 (SD). In Group A, the uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) changed from 0.5 +/- 0.7 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (range 20/600 to 20/200) to 0.1 +/- 0.7 logMAR (range 20/60 to 20/20); the mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) changed from 0.1 +/- 0.7 logMAR (range 20/50 to 20/20) to 0 +/- 0.7 logMAR (range 20/50 to 20/20) after the enhancement. In Group B, the UCVA changed from 0.7 +/- 0.8 logMAR (range 20/600 to 20/40) to 0.1 +/- 0.7 logMAR (range 20/40 to 20/20); the mean BSCVA improved from 0.2 +/- 0.8 logMAR (range 20/30 to 20/20) to 0 +/- 1.3 logMAR (range 20/25 to 20/20) after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The enhancements using topographically guided excimer laser photoablation with a topographically supported customized ablation method resulted in satisfactory and stable visual outcome with good safety and efficacy after unsuccessful PRK and LASIK.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia with the VISX star laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for spherical and spherocylindrical myopia (range, 9-22 diopters [D]) with the VISX Star laser, (VISX Inc., Santa Clara, CA). DESIGN: Non-comparative, single-surgeon interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred ninety eyes of 175 patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent LASIK in the study range with the VISX Star laser were evaluated for early (approximately 1 month) and late (after 9 months) outcomes. Both single procedure outcomes and results after reoperation for refractive enhancement were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included uncorrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, refractive predictability, refractive stability, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), results of reoperations, and complications. RESULTS: At the early postoperative examination, approximately 1 month after surgery, 285 of 290 eyes (98.3%) were examined. Uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better occurred in 209 of 285 (73.3%) eyes, and 198 of 285 (69.5%) eyes had a manifest spheroequivalent between +/-1.00 D. Subsequently, 60 eyes (20.7%) underwent reoperation for refractive enhancement. Late results, beyond 8 months from the initial surgery and including reoperations, were available in 195 of 290 eyes (67.2%). Uncorrected visual acuity results of 20/40 or better were found in 166 of 195 eyes (85.1%) and of 20/25 or better in 99 of 195 eyes (50.8%). Manifest spheroequivalent results were +/-2.00 D in 187 of 195 eyes (95.9%) and +/-1.00 D in 148 of 195 eyes (75.9%). In a paired-cohort analysis of 131 single-procedure eyes seen at both intervals, refractive stability (change in manifest refractive spheroequivalent of less than 1.00 D) was present in 101 of 131 eyes (77.1%) between the two observation intervals. Overall, approximately 3.6% eyes lost 2 lines or more of BSCVA, and other complications (flap wrinkling and epithelial ingrowth) were reported in 2% of eyes. Improvement in BSCVA of 1 line or more occurred in 5.6% eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia with the VISX Star laser provided satisfactory refractive and visual results that compare well with other reports in the literature. Subjective results and other measures of visual function need further evaluation.     

Hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis to treat overcorrected myopic LASIK

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in treating hyperopia caused by overcorrected myopic LASIK and to evaluate a new technique to place the hyperopic treatment after lifting the initial myopic flap. SETTING: Open-access outpatient excimer laser surgical facility. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 54 eyes in 47 patients who had spherical hyperopic LASIK by 21 surgeons for the treatment of significant hyperopia after overcorrected LASIK for myopia. In 42 eyes, the initial LASIK flaps were lifted and in 12 eyes, new flaps were cut. The mean age of the 25 men (53%) and 22 women (47%) was 48.2 years +/- 8.4 (SD). Outcome measures included refractive error, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and complications. The mean follow-up was 2.97 months. RESULTS: In eyes in which postoperative emmetropia was attempted (n = 45), the mean spherical equivalent improved from +1.21 +/- 0.49 diopters (D) preoperatively to -0.38 +/- 0.50 D postoperatively (P <.001). The mean UCVA improved from 20/38.6 +/- 16.3 to 20/27.4 +/- 9.4 (P <.001). At the last follow-up, 69% of eyes were within +/-0.5 D and 96% were within +/-1.0 D of emmetropia; 42% had a UCVA of 20/20 and 96% had a UCVA of 20/40 or better. No eyes lost 2 or more lines of BSCVA. No vision-threatening complications occurred. Results in patients who had initial flaps lifted and those who had new flaps cut were statistically indistinguishable. On average, achieved hyperopic corrections were 18% greater than intended. CONCLUSION: Hyperopic LASIK was safe, predictable, and effective in the treatment of hyperopia caused by overcorrected myopic LASIK. Results were similar whether the original flap was lifted or a new one was cut.     

Clear lens extraction with intraocular lens followed by photorefractive keratectomy or laser in situ keratomileusis

OBJECTIVE: To study photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) after clear lens extraction (CLE) with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for hyperopia or astigmatism. DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-five eyes (55 subjects) had CLE with posterior chamber IOL implants for hyperopia up to 12.25 diopters (D); 31 eyes were retreated with PRK, and 34 eyes were retreated with LASIK for residual ametropias. INTERVENTION: For PRK and LASIK, the refractive surgery was performed with the slit-scanning excimer laser Nidek EC-5000, Nidek Co., Tokyo, Japan. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Manifest refraction, best-spectacle and uncorrected Snellen visual acuity, haze, and halos were evaluated before surgery and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperative. RESULTS: Forty-seven eyes were evaluated at the 12-month postoperative examination: 96% of these eyes had spherical equivalents (SE) within +/-2 D of emmetropia, 79% of eyes had SE within +/-1 D of emmetropia and 51% of eyes had SE within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia. Eighty-five percent of the eyes at 12 months postoperative had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better, and 46% of eyes had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Eighty-seven percent of the eyes at 12 months postoperative had uncorrected visual acuity within 1 Snellen line of their initial best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) before all treatment. No eye lost 2 Snellen lines of BSCVA at 3, 6, or 12 months after PRK or after LASIK. CONCLUSIONS: IOL implantation for CLE, although an invasive technique, resulted in better refractive outcomes without laser-related clinical complications after PRK or LASIK adjustment.