Management of anticoagulation in patients with subacute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia scheduled for heart transplantation

Anticoagulation management of patients with recent heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery is a serious challenge, and especially difficult in patients requiring urgent heart transplantation. As nonheparin anticoagulants during CPB bear a high risk of major bleeding, these patients are at risk of being taken off the transplant list. Short-term use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) for CPB, with restriction of UFH to the surgery itself, is safe and effective in patients with a history of HIT who test negative for antiplatelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies. We present evidence that it is safe to expand the concept of UFH reexposure to patients with subacute HIT (ie, those patients with recent HIT in whom the platelet count has recovered but in whom anti-PF4/heparin IgG antibodies remain detectable) requiring heart transplantation, if they test negative by a sensitive functional assay using washed platelets. This can be lifesaving in patients with end-stage heart failure.     

High incidence of anti-heparin/platelet factor 4 antibodies after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery

Fifty-one patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were studied on day 0 and day 8 for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The platelet aggregation test (PAT) and tests for anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 (anti-H.PF4), anti-IL8 and anti-neutrophil activating peptide 2 (anti-NAP2) antibodies (Ab) were performed by ELISA. On day 8, 27% of patients were positive for anti-H.PF4Ab. None of these results were found to influence thrombotic complications or platelet counts after CPB. Our results suggest that IgG to H.PF4 may be considered a risk factor, but that additional factors must be required for HIT to develop. We conclude that assays based on platelet activation would be more appropriate for the diagnosis of HIT after CPB.     

Antibodies to platelet factor 4-heparin after cardiopulmonary bypass in patients anticoagulated with unfractionated heparin or a low-molecular-weight heparin : clinical implications for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) induces platelet activation with release of platelet factor 4 (PF4), and patients are exposed to high doses of heparin (H). We investigated whether this contributes to the development of antibodies to H-PF4 and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). METHODS AND RESULTS: CPB was performed with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in 328 patients. After surgery, patients received UFH (calcium heparin, 200 IU. kg-1. d-1) (group 1, n=157) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH, Dalteparin, 5000 IU once daily) (group 2, n=171). Eight days after surgery, antibodies to H-PF4 were present in 83 patients (25.3%), 46 in group 1 and 37 in group 2 (P=0.12). Most patients (61%) had IgG1 to H-PF4, but only 8 samples with antibodies induced platelet activation with positive results on serotonin release assay. HIT occurred in 6 patients in group 1, but no thrombocytopenia was observed in subjects receiving LMWH, although 2 had high levels of antibodies with positive serotonin release assay results. When antibodies to H-PF4 were present, mean platelet counts were lower only in patients with FcgammaRIIA R/R131 platelets. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence that the development of antibodies to H-PF4 after CPB performed with UFH is not influenced by the postoperative heparin treatment. The antibodies associated with high risk of HIT are mainly IgG1, which is present at high titers in the plasma of patients continuously treated with UFH.     

Serum antibodies to the heparin/platelet factor 4 complex are an independent predictor of thrombotic complications following pediatric fontan surgery

Antibodies to the heparin/platelet factor 4 complex (heparin/PF4) are linked to the pathogenesis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and to the thrombotic complications. We investigated thrombotic events during early follow-up in a pediatric cardiac surgical population to ascertain whether there is a relation between heparin/PF4 antibody concentration and post-surgical thrombotic complications. One hundred and five consecutive pediatric patients treated by Fontan surgery were studied. The presence of serum heparin/PF4 immunoglobulins IgG, IgA, and IgM (collectively termed HIT antibodies) were measured in preoperative and postoperative blood samples by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. On day six after Fontan surgery, HIT-related thromboses was identified in total of 11 patients (10.5%). HIT antibodies were detected in 34 of 105 patients (32.4%). The post-surgical nadir platelet count was significantly lower in patients who developed antibodies (p < 0.001). We found the odds ratio (OR) for this composite endpoint was 4.06 (p < 0.001). Seropositive status for heparin/PF4 antibodies was an independent predictor of thrombotic events (OR 2.28; p < 0.001). Quintile analysis revealed that the median nadir platelet value was significantly lower in patients with higher HIT antibody titers. Patients in the highest quintile of HIT antibody titer all experienced thrombotic events, while only two thrombotic events occurred in patients in the lowest quintile (p < 0.001). Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a rare occurrence in pediatric cardiac surgical patients. Patients who develop antibodies to the heparin/PF4 complex have a significantly higher rate of postoperative thrombotic events than patients who lack these antibodies. Within the seropositive group, the risk of developing thrombosis increased with the plasma antibody concentration.     

Changes in platelet count after cardiac surgery can effectively predict the development of pathogenic heparin-dependent antibodies

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) induces the release of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and patients are at risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). This study was aimed to determine whether an abnormal evolution in platelet count (PC) after CPB is predictive of the development of HIT antibodies. Two abnormal PC patterns were defined: pattern P1, characterized by a decrease in PC following previous correction of thrombocytopenia occurring during CPB, and pattern P2, defined as a persistent low PC in the days following CPB. PC was evaluated for 10 d in 305 consecutive patients before and after CPB. Serotonin release assay (SRA) was carried out between days 8 and 10 to detect pathogenic heparin-dependent antibodies. Moreover, antibodies to heparin-PF4 (H-PF4) complexes were assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. PC evolution after CPB was normal in 300 patients although antibodies to H-PF4 were frequently present (53.4%). Changes in PC were abnormal in five patients with pattern P1 (n = 4) or P2 (n = 1). As SRA was positive in four of the five cases, the positive predictive value of abnormal PC pattern for pathogenic HIT antibodies was 80%. Careful follow-up of PC after CPB makes it possible to predict with high specificity (99%) for those patients who develop pathogenic HIT antibodies.     

Role of platelet surface PF4 antigenic complexes in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia pathogenesis: diagnostic and therapeutic implications

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) antibodies recognize complexes between heparin and platelet factor 4 (PF4). Heparin and PF4 bind HIT antibodies only over a narrow molar ratio. We explored the involvement of platelet surface-bound PF4 as an antigen in the pathogenesis of experimental HIT. We show that cell-surface PF4 complexes are also antigenic only over a restricted concentration range of PF4. Heparin is not required for HIT antibody binding but shifts the concentration of PF4 needed for optimal surface antigenicity to higher levels. These data are supported by in vitro studies involving both human and murine platelets with exogenous recombinant human (h) PF4 and either an anti-PF4-heparin monoclonal antibody (KKO) or HIT immunoglobulin. Injection of KKO into transgenic mice expressing different levels of hPF4 demonstrates a correlation between the severity of the thrombocytopenia and platelet hPF4 expression. Therapeutic interventions in this model using high-dose heparin or protamine sulfate support the pathogenic role of surface PF4 antigenic complexes in the etiology of HIT. We believe that this focus on surface PF4 advances our understanding of the pathogenesis of HIT, suggests ways to identify patients at high risk to develop HIT upon heparin exposure, and offers new therapeutic strategies.     

Investigation of a platelet factor 4 polymorphism on the immune response in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

A small fraction of patients who receive heparin develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and, of these patients, a still smaller proportion develop associated thrombotic complications. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is caused by the formation of antibodies that bind to specific complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. However, it remains uncertain why certain patients form these antibodies and develop HIT or why certain patients have thrombotic events. In this report we describe studies on individuals with and without HIT to determined if a potential PF4 polymorphism could explain differences in susceptibility to HIT. In the 10 control individuals and the 10 patients we studied, we did not find a difference in the PF4 sequences. Genetic difference in the PF4 antigenic target does not explain the occurrence of HIT in susceptible patients.     

Investigation of a platelet factor 4 polymorphism on the immune response in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

A small fraction of patients who receive heparin develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and, of these patients, a still smaller proportion develop associated thrombotic complications. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is caused by the formation of antibodies that bind to specific complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. However, it remains uncertain why certain patients form these antibodies and develop HIT or why certain patients have thrombotic events. In this report we describe studies on individuals with and without HIT to determined if a potential PF4 polymorphism could explain differences in susceptibility to HIT. In the 10 control individuals and the 10 patients we studied, we did not find a difference in the PF4 sequences. Genetic difference in the PF4 antigenic target does not explain the occurrence of HIT in susceptible patients.     

Laboratory testing for VITT antibodies

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a highly prothrombotic disorder that like heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by platelet-activating antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4). However, unlike HIT—where heparin at low concentrations (0.1-0.5 U/mL) typically enhances antibody-induced platelet activation, platelet activation by VITT sera is usually inhibited by heparin. Further, conventional platelet activation assays for HIT, such as the serotonin-release assay (SRA) and heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) test, often yield negative or atypical results when testing VITT sera. Nevertheless, VITT (like HIT) is a “clinical-pathological” disorder whereby laboratory detectability of platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies is crucial for diagnosis. VITT antibodies follow 2 fundamental principles of HIT laboratory testing: (1) high probability of a positive PF4-dependent enzyme-immunoassay (EIA), and (2) high probability of a positive platelet activation assay. However, optimal detection of VITT in platelet activation assays requires the addition of PF4, for example, PF4-enhanced SRA (PF4-SRA) and PF4-enhanced HIPA (PIPA). A novel whole blood assay, called the PF4-induced flow cytometry-based platelet activation (PIFPA) assay, exhibits high sensitivity and specificity for VITT. HIT and VITT sera/plasmas differ in their reactivity in rapid HIT immunoassays (90-97% sensitivity for HIT, <25% sensitivity for VITT), consistent with distinct antigen sites on PF4 recognized by HIT and VITT antibodies.     

Incidence and clinical significance of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies of the IgG, IgM, and IgA class in 755 consecutive patient samples referred for diagnostic testing for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is usually caused by anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies, leading to intravascular platelet activation. These antibodies can be detected by PF4/polyanion antigen assays or platelet activation assays. While antigen assays are very sensitive and recognize immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgA, and IgM antibodies, the role of IgM and IgA HIT-antibodies is debated. Platelet activation assays recognize IgG and are more specific for clinical HIT. METHODS: We analyzed sera from 755 consecutive patients referred for diagnostic testing for HIT using a PF4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for IgG, IgA, and IgM and by the heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) test. Clinical information was provided by the treating physicians. RESULTS: A total of 108 of 755 (14.3%) patients tested positive, 105 (13.9%) in the PF4/heparin IgG/A/M ELISA [28 (26.7%) only for IgM/A]; 53 (7.0%) sera were positive in the HIPA, of those 50 tested also positive in the ELISA. In 77 patients sufficient clinical information was provided. Available clinical information for 17 of the 28 patients who had only IgM and/or IgA detected showed plausible alternative (non-HIT) explanations in four of seven who had thromboembolic complications and in nine of 10 who had isolated HIT. CONCLUSION: Detection of IgG, IgM and IgA class antibodies by PF4/heparin ELISA yields a positive test result about twice as often as does a platelet activation assay, with only a minority of the additional patients detected likely having HIT. Thus, there is a potential for considerable over-diagnosis of HIT by laboratories that utilize only an ELISA for diagnostic testing.     

Glucosamine sulfate does not crossreact with the antibodies of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

OBJECTIVE: To assess the crossreactivity of glucosamine sulfate, used for treatment of degenerative joint disease with antibodies induced in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). BACKGROUND: HIT is a severe adverse effect of heparin therapy induced by an immunological mechanism. The antibodies in HIT are induced by a complex of heparin and, in most cases, platelet factor 4. Hereby generation of the antigen is not strictly dependent on heparin. Heparin can be substituted by a variety of polysulfated carbohydrates. In vitro and in vivo crossreactivity of HIT antibodies has been demonstrated for a chemically polysulfated chondroitin-like substance (Arteparon, Luitpoldwerke, Munich, Germany), formerly used for chondroprotection. Another drug widely used in the treatment of degenerative joint disease is glucosamine sulfate. Glucosamine is a building block of glycosaminoglycans, of which heparin is the clinically most important. Many patients with degenerative joint disease use glucosamine sulfate. This group is also at the highest risk to develop HIT following joint replacement surgery. METHODS: We examined the interactions of glucosamine sulfate (DONA 200-S, Opfermann, Wiehl, Germany) with platelets and antibodies of patients with HIT in and without the presence of heparin. Sera of 5 HIT patients and platelets of 4 healthy donors were used. The binding of HIT antibodies to PF4/glucosamine sulfate complexes was assessed by an ELISA. RESULTS: HIT antibodies did not activate platelets in the presence of glucosamine sulfate in a serotonin-release assay. Preincubation with glucosamine sulfate did not inhibit platelet activation by HIT antibodies in the presence of heparin (0.2 IU/ml). Antibodies bonded to PF4/heparin but not to PF4/glucosamine sulfate complexes. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to sulfated glycosaminoglycans, there is no evidence for an immunological crossreactivity of HIT antibodies between heparin and glucosamine sulfate.     

Anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies in orthopedic surgery patients receiving antithrombotic prophylaxis with fondaparinux or enoxaparin

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by platelet-activating IgG antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4) bound to heparin. Immunogenicity of heparins differs in that unfractionated heparin (UFH) induces more anti-PF4/heparin antibodies than low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and UFH also causes more HIT. Fondaparinux, a synthetic anticoagulant modeled after the antithrombin-binding pentasaccharide, is believed to be nonimmunogenic. We tested 2726 patients for anti-PF4/heparin antibodies after they were randomized to receive antithrombotic prophylaxis with fondaparinux or LMWH (enoxaparin) following hip or knee surgery. We also evaluated in vitro cross-reactivity of the IgG antibodies generated against PF4 in the presence of UFH, LMWH, danaparoid, or fondaparinux. We found that anti-PF4/heparin antibodies were generated at similar frequencies in patients treated with fondaparinux or enoxaparin. Although antibodies reacted equally well in vitro against PF4/UFH and PF4/LMWH, and sometimes weakly against PF4/danaparoid, none reacted against PF4/fondaparinux, including even those sera obtained from patients who formed antibodies during fondaparinux treatment. At high concentrations, however, fondaparinux inhibited binding of HIT antibodies to PF4/polysaccharide, indicating that PF4/fondaparinux interactions occur. No patient developed HIT. We conclude that despite similar immunogenicity of fondaparinux and LMWH, PF4/fondaparinux, but not PF4/LMWH, is recognized poorly by the antibodies generated, suggesting that the risk of HIT with fondaparinux likely is very low.     

Platelet factor 4/heparin-particle gel immunoassay (PaGIA) is a weak method for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) evaluation of post cardio-pulmonary bypass surgery patients

Diagnosis of heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is not always easy, especially when a confirmatory functional test is not available. In most cases the diagnosis relies on the combination of pretest probability and an immunologic test. Among patients post cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery, anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies tend to be high but with low clinical implication. The current retrospective study examined the behavior of patients with positive PF4/heparin-PaGIA results, divided into two groups according to whether or not they have undergone CPB surgery. The main focus of the study was on the reliability of the PF4/heparin-PaGIA test in these two settings. The files of 104 single center patients, who had a positive PF4/heparin-PaGIA test, were reviewed. 62 % were post CPB and 38 % were not. An association between the intensity of positivity of PF4/heparin-PaGIA test and both the 4Ts pretest probability method (p = 0.003) and the incidence of thrombosis (p = 0.02) was found only in the patients who have not undergone CPB surgery, but not in the CPB patients. This study suggests that PF4/heparin-PaGIA is not a reliable method in patients post CPB surgery who are investigated for a possible diagnosis of HIT.     

Heparin-dependent and -independent anti-platelet factor 4 autoantibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Objective. Antibodies that recognize complexes formed by platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin are involved in the pathogenesis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). This study was undertaken to investigate the prevalence and clinical correlations of anti-PF4 autoantibodies in patients with SLE. Methods. We studied 118 patients with SLE, 78 with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), 27 with primary APS, 2 with HIT (as positive controls) and 47 healthy controls. Heparin-dependent and -independent anti-PF4 antibodies were measured with an ELISA. Antibody binding was confirmed to be heparin-dependent when inhibited by the presence of a high concentration of heparin. Pathogenic anti-PF4 antibody was assessed by serotonin-release assay. Results. Heparin-dependent anti-PF4 antibodies were detected in 11 SLE (9%) and 2 primary ITP (3%) patients, but at much lower levels than in HIT patients. In serotonin-release assays, only the HIT sera induced platelet activation in vitro. Heparin-independent anti-PF4 antibodies were detected in 17 SLE patients (14%). There was no correlation between the levels of heparin-dependent and -independent anti-PF4 antibodies. Cross-reactivity between these two antibodies was not detectable by ELISA competitive assay. Heparin-dependent anti-PF4 antibodies were associated with thrombocytopenia and IgM aCLs (P?=?0.007 for both comparisons), while heparin-independent anti-PF4 antibody levels were correlated with SLE disease activity index (P?=?0.0005). None of the SLE patients with anti-PF4 antibodies had previous heparin exposure. Conclusion. PF4 is an autoimmune target in SLE patients. Heparin-dependent and -independent anti-PF4 autoantibodies may be involved in different aspects of pathophysiology of SLE.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: molecular pathogenesis

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a common and often serious complication of heparin therapy [1,2]. Although the reduction in platelet levels associated with HIT is usually not severe, about 10% of patients experience arterial and/or venous thromboses (HITT), which can be incapacitating or fatal [3]. Recent work done in our laboratory [4] and by others [5-7] has shown that patients with HIT/T* almost invariably have antibodies specific for complexes consisting of heparin and platelet factor 4 (PF4), a heparin-binding protein found normally in platelet alpha granules. We [4] and others [8] have developed hypotheses to explain how these antibodies cause HIT/T in patients given heparin, but knowledge of the disease process is far from complete. An unusual feature of HIT/T is that antibodies important in pathogenesis are specific for complexes made up of two normal body constituents: PF4 and heparin. These antibodies are produced by a high percentage of certain patient populations treated with heparin, but only a minority of antibody formers are adversely affected. We postulate that a fuller understanding of the molecular basis for this immune response could lead to improved diagnosis, treatment and prevention of HIT/T and to the identification of risk factors that predispose to this complication.     

Les thrombocytopénies induites par l’héparine : données récentes

Despite less frequent, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) remains a severe complication of treatment with heparin, and is important to diagnose and manage appropriately. HIT results from an atypical immune response to heparin, with the synthesis of IgG antibodies specific to heparin-modified platelet factor 4 (PF4) which activate platelets, leukocytes and the endothelium. This activation explains that low platelet count is associated with thrombotic events in 50% of patients. The diagnosis of HIT is sometimes evoked because of atypical manifestations (i.e. cutaneous necrosis, amnesia, hypotension or dyspnea following intravenous injection of heparin). Biological assays are always necessary to confirm HIT in case of clinical suspicion, and specific rapid tests are now available for detecting anti-PF4 antibodies. However, their specificity is poor and functional assays such as serotonin release assay or platelet aggregation test are often necessary. Argatroban that is a direct antithrombin drug can be used in patients with severe renal failure and will be preferred to danaparoid sodium in this situation. Fondaparinux is not licensed for treating confirmed HIT and can only be used in case of suspicion. The early detection of HIT is based on the monitoring of platelet count recommended in surgical patients receiving a low molecular weight heparin and in all patients treated with unfractionated heparin.     

What is the potential for overdiagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia?

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by platelet-activating antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4//heparin (PF4/H) complexes. According to the "iceberg model," only a subset of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies of IgG class evincing strong platelet-activating properties cause clinical HIT. Since many centers rely predominantly on an anti-PF4/polyanion enzyme-immunoassay (EIA) to diagnose HIT, we estimated the potential for overdiagnosis when only this single test is available. We examined a database of 100 patients in whom the probability of HIT had been estimated using a clinical scoring system (4Ts), and where patients underwent systematic testing for HIT antibodies using three assays: the platelet serotonin release assay (SRA), an "in-house" EIA that detects IgG anti-PF4/heparin antibodies (EIA-IgG), and a commercial EIA that detects anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies of all three immunoglobulin classes (EIA-GTI). Whereas 16 of 100 patients fulfilled a "classic" definition of HIT (intermediate/high probability plus strong platelet-activating anti-PF4/heparin IgG antibodies), an additional 16 patients fulfilled a "liberal" definition in which any investigated patient (irrespective of the pretest probability) who had a positive EIA-GTI was considered to have HIT. The clinical features of these 16 additional patients--including generally weak antibodies and low risk for thrombosis--suggest underlying non-HIT explanations for thrombocytopenia. Patients with a positive SRA generally corresponded to those with intermediate or high pretest probability of HIT who also had strong EIA-GTI reactivity (>1.20 OD units). We conclude there is the potential to overdiagnose HIT by approximately 100% if any positive EIA is considered to "confirm" the diagnosis of HIT irrespective of the clinical scenario.     

Laboratory diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a clinical‐pathological disorder; thus, laboratory testing for the pathogenic platelet‐activating antiplatelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies is central for diagnosis. The “iceberg” model summarizes the inter‐relationship between platelet activation assays and PF4‐dependent immunoassays, with platelet‐activating antibodies comprising a subset of anti‐PF4/heparin antibodies. The platelet serotonin‐release assay (SRA), performed by reference laboratories, has high sensitivity and specificity for HIT (~95% each), and is especially suited for detecting highly pathogenic HIT sera containing both heparin‐dependent and heparin‐independent platelet‐activating antibodies; this latter subgroup of antibodies explains “autoimmune HIT” disorders (delayed‐onset, persisting, spontaneous, heparin “flush,” fondaparinux‐associated). Recently, SRA‐negative HIT has become recognized, in which serum from some HIT patients contains subthreshold levels of platelet‐activating antibodies (by SRA) that become detectable using a PF4‐enhanced platelet activation assay. Unusual immunologic features of HIT include early antibody detectability (at onset of platelet count fall) and antibody transience (seroreversion). Widely available PF4‐dependent enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) have high sensitivity but poor specificity for HIT, although specificity is enhanced with IgG‐specific EIAs and strong positive results; unfortunately, EIA results are usually not available in real time. Automated rapid immunoassays, such as the chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and latex immunoturbidimetric assay (LIA), facilitate real‐time laboratory diagnosis. Recently available likelihood ratio (LR) data for positive (LR+) and negative (LR?) test results allow clinicians to adjust their pretest probabilities for HIT, using Bayesian analysis, into real‐time posttest probabilities that are dramatically increased (test positive) or decreased (test negative). Moreover, (semi‐)quantitative CLIA‐ and LIA‐positive results (weak, moderate, strong positive) can further refine the posttest probability of HIT.     

HITlights: a career perspective on heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Two decades of research into heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) permit a personal historical perspective on this fascinating syndrome. Previously, the frequency of HIT was unknown, although complicating thrombosis was believed to be rare and primarily arterial. The opportunity to apply a remarkable test for "HIT antibodies"--the (14) C-serotonin-release assay (SRA)--to serial plasma samples obtained during a clinical trial of heparin thromboprophylaxis, provided insights into the peculiar nature of HIT, such as, its prothrombotic nature--including its strong association with venous thrombosis (RR = 11.6 [95%CI, 6.4-20.8; P < 0.0001); its more frequent occurrence with unfractionated versus low-molecular-weight heparin; the "iceberg" model, which states that among the many patients who form anti-PF4/heparin antibodies during heparin therapy, only a minority whose antibodies evince strong platelet-activating properties develop HIT; and the characteristic HIT timeline, whereby serum/plasma antibodies are readily detectable at or prior to the HIT-associated platelet count fall. Applying the SRA also to patients encountered in clinical practice led to recognition of warfarin-induced venous limb gangrene (for which HIT is a major risk factor via its extreme hypercoagulability) and delayed-onset HIT (whereby thrombocytopenia begins or worsens following heparin discontinuation, due to the ability of HIT antibodies strongly to activate platelets even in the absence of heparin--so-called heparin-"independent" platelet activation). Recent concepts include the increasing recognition of HIT "overdiagnosis" (due to the low diagnostic specificity of the widely-applied PF4-dependent immunoassays), and the observation that HIT-associated consumptive coagulopathy is a risk factor for treatment failure with PTT-adjusted direct thrombin inhibitor therapy ("PTT confounding" secondary to HIT-associated coagulopathy).     

The use of direct thrombin inhibitors in cardiovascular surgery in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

One of the most important adverse drug reactions that physicians encounter is the life- and limb-threatening prothrombotic syndrome known as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Unfractionated heparin (UFH), administered during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), is highly immunogenic. Heparin-dependent antibodies can develop in 25 to 50% of UFH-treated cardiac surgery patients within 5 to 10 days. These antibodies can activate platelets and are considered the causative agents of HIT. HIT is a relatively common complication, occurring in 1 to 3% of cardiovascular surgery patients when UFH administration is continued postoperatively. It is strongly associated with new thromboembolic events leading to limb amputation and death. In acute or recent (< 100 days) HIT, alternative anticoagulatory regimens are needed during CPB surgery for prevention of HIT-related thrombosis. Treatment options for such patients now generally include the use of alternative anticoagulants such as lepirudin, bivalirudin, or danaparoid, as well as a combined treatment with platelet-function inhibitors and heparin. In patients with a history of HIT and no detectable antibodies, heparin is currently the safest approach for high-dose anticoagulation during CPB. Before and after surgery, however, alternative anticoagulants should be used. The risk of clinical HIT after heart surgery could potentially be reduced by using low-molecular-weight heparins for postsurgery anticoagulation.