Glycemic control with metformin or insulin therapy in adolescents with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND: Only metformin and insulin are approved by the FDA for adolescents. OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of insulin versus metformin in adolescents with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) and examine whether psychosocial factors affect therapeutic efficacy. METHODS: Phase I involved a retrospective examination of the medical records of 18 adolescents with DM2. Glycemic control was evaluated by mean HbA1c. We tested for relationships between glycemic control and BMI, number of outpatient visits per year, and self-reported compliance. Phase II employed a pilot questionnaire. RESULTS: Glycemic control deteriorated when therapy was changed from insulin (HbA1c, 5.0+/-2.6% [SD]) to metformin (8.4+/-2.9%; p <0.05). Self-reported compliance positively predicted glycemic control (p <0.005) and inversely correlated with degree of weight loss (p <0.05). Pilot questionnaire data suggested that patients may perceive their DM as less serious when treated with metformin. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin was often ineffective in our adolescents with DM2 and compliance was a major factor. Altered perception of the seriousness of their DM may have influenced adherence to therapy.     

Metformin adjunctive therapy with insulin improves glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a pilot study

Metformin lowers blood glucose by reducing hepatic glucose output and improving insulin sensitivity without requiring an increase in circulating insulin concentration. We hypothesized that metformin could be used adjunctively with insulin to improve glycemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). We conducted a 6-month open-label pilot study in 10 adolescents and young adults with type 1 DM, 19.1 +/- 3.4 years, 4 males, 6 females, and body mass index 26.3 +/- 3.1 kg/m2. Patients started metformin at a dose of 250 mg b.i.d.; the dose was increased until blood glucose was within an optimal target range or a maximum of 2,500 mg/d was reached. Insulin dose was reduced as needed to prevent hypoglycemia. Seven patients had an average decrease in HbA(1c) of 11% from pretreatment. These responders had no change in insulin dose, BMI or lipid levels during the study. Three patients had no improvement of HbA(1c) on therapy. We conclude that some patients with type 1 DM will have improved glycemic control on adjunctive metformin therapy. Evaluation of the long-term benefit and safety of adjunctive therapy in patients with type 1 DM is warranted.     

The effect of adding metformin to insulin therapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus children: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

We aimed to assess the effectiveness of adding metformin to insulin in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) children for improving metabolic outcomes. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted on children age 6 to 19 years who are diagnosed with T1DM, and examined the effect of adding Metformin to standard insulin therapy. We performed literature searches on Ovid Midline, Ovid Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from the date of inception of the database to February 15, 2016. Two reviewers screened titles and abstracts independently, assessed full text eligibility, and extracted information from eligible trials. The primary outcome is glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and the secondary outcomes are health‐related quality of life, body mass index (BMI), lipid profile, total insulin daily dose, hypoglycaemia, and diabetes ketoacidosis. We screened 736 studies, and included 6 RCTs with 325 patients. All RCTs were of low risk of bias, and included adolescents (mean age 15 years). The meta‐analysis showed that the addition of Metformin resulted in decreased total insulin daily dose (TIDD) (unit/kg/d) (mean difference [MD] = ?0.15, 95%CI, ?0.24, ?0.06), and reduced BMI kg/m² (MD ?1.46, 95%CI ?2.54, 0.38), and BMI z‐score (MD= ? 0.11, 95%CI ?0.21, ?0.01), and similar HbA1c (%) (MD= ? 0.05, 95%CI, ?0.19, 0.29). The overall evidence quality was high to moderate. Current evidence does not support use of Metformin in T1DM adolescents to improve HbA1c. However, Metformin may provide modest reduction in TIDD and BMI.     

Treatment of adolescents with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND: A worldwide increased incidence of adolescents with type 2 diabetes mellitus is evident. Only few substances are available for treatment of adolescents with type 2 diabetes. We report on our experience of treatment in the diabetes centre in Leipzig, Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS: At the moment we care for three patients with type 2 diabetes (two girls and one boy) age 16 - 17 years. We retrospectively analyzed the patients records for symptoms at onset, BMI, HbA1c and treatment for a maximum of 4 years. RESULTS: None of the adolescents had typical symptoms at onset. All had first or second degree relatives with type 2 diabetes. Diagnosis was made using oral glucose tolerance test. BMI at onset was 26 kg/m (2) (90.-97 percent) to 35.2 kg/m (2) (>99.5 percent). Fasting and stimulated insulin and c-peptide levels were elevated in all cases. An elevated HbA1c level was found in one patient. Two patients had further metabolic symptoms like hypertriglyceridemia or hyperurikemia. We started with metformin after dietary instructions in all cases. One girl is on insulin at the moment and the boy stopped metformin after weight reduction of 24.5 kg. CONCLUSIONS: In Germany type 2 diabetes is diagnosed more frequently at an early age. Adolescents with type 2 diabetes should be treated in a centre for pediatric diabetology. Treatment should consist of an individualized care for all aspects of type 2 diabetes.     

Management of hyperglycemia in minority children with type 2 diabetes mellitus

This paper discusses management of hyperglycemia in minority children with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Over the past several years the incidence of type 2 DM in minority children and adolescents has markedly increased. Intensive management of children with type 2 DM includes exercise, diet, insulin therapy, oral drug (metformin) therapy, and combination insulin-oral drug therapy. The results of a study of the efficacy of treatment modalities in 35 African-American children are presented. In the study, the patients were divided into two groups, one treated with diet or metformin therapy (20 children) and the other with insulin or a combination of insulin and metformin (15 children). All of the children in the study were negative for antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase. Plasma glucose and serum C-peptide concentrations were measured at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after ingestion of a liquid meal (Sustacal) (7 ml/kg with a maximum of 360 ml). The increase of C-peptide (ACP) in response to the mixed meal was calculated by peak minus fasting C-peptide. ACP was significantly higher in those children treated with diet/metformin than in those treated with insulin/insulin and metformin combination therapy (4.6 +/- 1.9 vs 21 +/- 1.6, p <0.01). Mean HbA1c at one-year follow up was lower for the diet/metformin patients than in the insulin/insulin and metformin group (7.0 +/- 2.8 vs 11.4 +/- 3.7, p <0.01). Our results indicate that in children with type 2 DM, there is more severe pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction in the group of children requiring insulin therapy.     

Clinical similarity and diagnostic difficulties in differentiation of diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2 in adolescence - case report

The authors would like to present the difficulties in differentiation of diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2 in adolescence on the basis of two 17 years-old patients. In both patients' cases the following symptoms: polydipsia, polyuria and weight loss with hyperglycemia and glycosuria have been observed for a few months. During laboratory studies some additional abnormalities were observed: elevated HbA1c, dyslipidemia and high level of liver enzymes. Normal level of insulin as well as C-peptide lack of ketonuria and negative parameters of autoimmunologic reaction the supported diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type 2. Due to insulin therapy and metformin a correct level of glycemia was achieved. CONCLUSION: Decompensated diabetes mellitus type 2 in adolescents may be difficult to differentiate with type 1.     

Insulin injection regimens and metabolic control in an international survey of adolescents with type 1 diabetes over 3 years: results from the Hvidore study group

The optimal insulin regimen for paediatric patients with type 1 diabetes remains controversial. Therefore this multicentre study was performed in adolescents over a 3-year period to assess metabolic control, severe hypoglycaemia, and weight gain in relation to insulin injection regimens. Out of 2873 children and adolescents in an international survey in 1995, 872 adolescents (433 boys, 439 girls, mean age in 1995 11.3+/-2.2 years) were restudied in 1998, relating insulin regimens to HbA(1c) measured in a central laboratory. In addition, the daily dose of insulin, changes in body mass index (BMI), and events of severe hypoglycaemia were evaluated. Over 3 years, the use of multiple injection regimens increased from 42% to 71%: 251 patients remained on twice daily insulin, 365 remained on multiple injections and 256 shifted from twice daily insulin to multiple injections. In all three subgroups an increase in insulin dose, a deterioration of metabolic control, and an increase in BMI were observed. Metabolic control deteriorated less than expected over 3 years during adolescence (HbA(1c) 1995: 8.7+/-1.6%; 1998 observed: 8.9+/-1.6%, HbA(1c) expected for 1998: 9.0%). BMI increased more than expected, the increase was greatest in patients switching from twice daily to multiple injections, and higher in females compared to males. CONCLUSION: in this international study, metabolic control was unsatisfactory in many adolescents with type 1 diabetes irrespective of the insulin regimen. No improvement in metabolic control was observed in this cross-sectional survey, over 3 years in any of the subgroups. Even the group switching from twice to multiple injections did not improve blood glucose control and the increase in body mass index was most pronounced in this group. Conclusive evidence, however, should be based on prospectively planned, randomised therapeutic trials in paediatric patients.     

Predictors of metabolic control at one year in a population of pediatric patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The rising prevalence of pediatric type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) and non-adherence to diabetes regimens pose challenges to obtaining optimal control. This study evaluated factors that may impact glycemic control (HbA1c): age, Tanner stage, body mass index (BMI), total daily insulin (TDD), metformin dose (MET), activity level, frequency of clinic visits and adherence. METHODS: One-year data from 72 patients (ages 8.6-17.8 years) were collected retrospectively. From that sample, 57 patients who continued to attend clinic for the entire year were assessed and divided into optimal and suboptimal HbA1c control groups. RESULTS: All factors measured were similar in the two groups, except for lower initial and 1.0-year HbA1c, TDD, and rates of missing MET and insulin in the optimal HbA1c control group. CONCLUSIONS: Initial glycemic status and adherence rate predicted metabolic control at one year. Early identification of DM2 may improve metabolic outcome, which may improve medical regimen adherence.     

Weight in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus during continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) has become increasingly popular as a form of intensified insulin therapy in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). One reported drawback was increased weight gain in adolescents after initiation of insulin pump therapy. In a prospective, longitudinal, non-randomized and case controlled study, we followed 12 adolescents (mean age 13.6 yr, 8 males, 4 females) from 6 months before the start of CSII to 12 months on CSII. These 12 adolescents with DM on CSII were matched for age, gender, HbA1c, duration of DM, and body mass index (BMI) with 12 adolescents who continued on multiple injection therapy (MIT). In addition, six of the 12 adolescents on CSII intended to control their weight by means of the insulin pump. These six vs six adolescents within the CSII group were further analyzed for weight development and eating habits. Clinical indications for CSII were dawn phenomenon, night-time hypoglycemia and patient request for more flexibility in DM management. All patients had been in satisfactory metabolic control on MIT. After 12 months of CSII, the daily insulin requirement remained significantly lower than 18 months before (0.79 +/- 0.11 vs 1.02 +/- 27 U/kg/d, p = 0.034) and number of daily meals was lower (4.1 +/- 0.9 vs 6.5 +/- 0.7, p = 0.006). Mean initial HbA1c was 7.4% in the MIT and CSII patients, and remained comparable between these two groups. BMI was not different between the CSII and MIT group over the entire study period. However, those adolescents on CSII who intended to control their weight by means of the insulin pump were able to achieve relative weight loss during the,first 6 months on CSII. Two patients of the CSII group had one severe hypoglycemic episode with loss of consciousness. In conclusion, CSII does not lead to weight gain by itself, but allows sufficient weight control without a negative effect on metabolic control. The general threat of weight gain in patients who switch to insulin pump therapy must be pointed out, and the role of eating habits and caloric content of food should play a central role in insulin pump educational programs.     

How should we treat type 2 diabetes in youth?

The worldwide increase of type 2 diabetes in youth is a critical problem. It is important to prevent the development of type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals. In many patients with type 2 diabetes, hyperglycemia can be reduced with appropriate changes in diet and exercise. However, some patients with persistent HbA1c levels >7.5% need pharmacological therapy to improve their metabolic control. A variety of oral hypoglycemic agents, including alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, sulfonylureas and metformin, are available. Metformin is widely used in pediatric patients and is considered to be the most effective oral agent. In some cases, combination therapy with metformin and sulfonylureas or use of insulin is more effective to stabilize glycemia. The approach to insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes often differs from that used in type 1 diabetes. The therapeutic approach to childhood type 2 diabetes should be individually tailored.     

Short-term insulin therapy in adolescents with type 2 diabetes mellitus

The optimum pharmacological treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) in youth for those who fail to achieve adequate glycemic control (HbA1c <7%) with lifestyle intervention is unknown. The aim of this pilot study was to observe the effect of short-term insulin therapy (<16 weeks duration) on glycemic control in youth with DM2. A pre-mix 30/70 insulin was given twice daily to 18 youth aged 10-18 years with DM2 for 8.7+/-4.3 weeks with a starting dose of 0.5 U/kg/day. HbA1c, body mass index (BMI) and episodes of hypoglycemia were monitored during the treatment period and for a 12-month period after insulin was stopped. Mean HbA1c decreased from 12.81% to 7.59% (95% CI 6.54, 8.64). This improvement persisted for 12 months without any further drug therapy. There was no significant change in mean BMI and there were no episodes of moderate or severe hypoglycemia. Decreasing beta-cell glucose toxicity with rapid improvement of blood glucose may play an important role in treatment of DM2 in adolescents. Early success in achieving target blood glucose levels is an important aspect of adolescent DM2 care.     

The impact of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion on health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes

AIM: To study the impact of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy on health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: 31 children and adolescents with poorly regulated type 1 diabetes (mean HbA1c 10.4%, SD 1.8), mean age 14.4 (1.5) y (range 9.7-17.1) and mean diabetes duration of 6.8 (3.2) y (range 1.3-14.6) were consecutively assigned to CSII therapy. Data for generic (CHQ-CF87) and diabetes-specific quality of life (DQOL) were obtained before initiating pump therapy and twice during 15 mo of treatment. HbA1c, BMI and episodes of severe hypoglycaemia and ketoacidosis were recorded over 15 mo prior to and 15 mo during pump therapy. RESULTS: Analysis showed improvements on the family activity scale (p=0.041) and change in health score (p=0.042) (CHQ-CF87). Mean HbA1c decreased from 10.4% (1.8) to 9.0% (0.9) after 3 mo, increasing to 9.6% (1.2) after 15 mo. The number of overweight and obese children increased from 4 and 2 before CSII, to 6 and 3 after 15 mo (IOTF criteria). There was a reduction in severe hypoglycaemia episodes from 43.8 to 5.2 per 100 patient years, but no change in ketoacidosis episodes. CONCLUSION: The degree of limitation experienced by families due to adolescents' general health and well-being was significantly reduced. Expected improvement in metabolic control and frequency of severe hypoglycaemia was observed.     

Pioglitazone as adjunctive therapy in adolescents with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the addition of the thiazoladinedione, pioglitazone, to standard therapy improves metabolic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and clinical evidence of insulin resistance. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled 6-month 2-site trial of pioglitazone therapy in 35 adolescents with T1D, high insulin requirements (>0.9 U/kg/d), and suboptimal metabolic control (A1c 7.5%-11%), with the primary outcome of change in A1c. Secondary outcomes include change in insulin dose, body mass index (BMI), lipids, and waist and hip circumference. RESULTS: Metabolic control (A1c) was improved at 6 months in all subjects (P = .02). There was no significant difference between the pioglitazone and placebo treatment groups at 6 months in either change in A1c (-0.4% +/- 0.9% and -0.5% +/- 1.2%, respectively) or insulin dose. BMI SDS increased by 0.3 +/- 0.3 (kg/m(2)) in the pioglitazone group and remained unchanged in the placebo group (P = .01). There was no significant difference in change in any lipid parameters between the pioglitazone and placebo groups at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive pioglitazone therapy was not effective in improving glycemic control in adolescents with T1D. Pioglitazone was associated with increased BMI.     

Metformin zur Behandlung des primär nicht insulinpflichtigen Diabetes mellitus bei adipösen Jugendlichen Bericht über 3 Fälle

Background. Metformin has proven efficacy in the treatment of obese adults with type-2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Case reports. We report in retrospect on three overweight adolescents with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, who were treated by hypocaloric diet plus metformin. During 10–14 months of follow -up, HbA1c transiently fell from 9.6–12.0% to 5.1–5.9%, while obesity persisted. In two patients (one with Prader-Willi-syndrome), body weight and HbA1c-levels increased again. Discussion. In summary, the cases provide further evidence for the efficacy of metformin in children and adolescents with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (e. g. type-2 diabetes). Caution,however, is required with this approach, as type-2 diabetes is the exception in childhood diabetes, and metformin should, therefore, be applied not as first-line treatment in childhood diabetes. Successful weight reduction appears to be of outmost importance for sustaining good metabolic control in obese adolescents with type-2 diabetes.     

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in children and adolescents with diabetes mellitus: decreased HbA1c with low risk of hypoglycemia

AIM: To evaluate blood glucose and HbA1c levels, insulin dosage, hypoglycemia rate and body mass index (BMI) at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months after initiation of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in children and youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: A 6-month trial of pump therapy was carried out in 40 patients with type 1 DM and one with cystic fibrosis (CF) induced DM (25 males), aged 4-25 years (mean 13.5 +/- 4.2 [SD]; 4-8 years, n = 6; 8-10 years, n = 8; 10-12 years, n = 4; 12-15 years, n = 11; >15 years, n = 12). RESULTS: HbA1c was significantly reduced from 9.5 +/- 1.7% to 8.6 +/- 1.2% at 3 months (p < 0.03), and at 6 months 8.8 +/- 1.5% (p < 0.05). The mean daily values of blood glucose, as well as individual mean values of blood glucose at fasting and before lunch, also exhibited a significant reduction (p < 0.05) at 3 and 6 months. There was a significant reduction in the number of hypoglycemic events (level of plasma glucose <3.3 mmol/l, calculated as number of events per patient/30 days) at 3 months (6.5 +/- 5.5 vs 2.8 +/- 3.3; p = 0.02) and at 6 months (6.5 +/- 5.5 vs 3.5 +/- 3.0; p = 0.04). The insulin requirement dropped by 27.2% (1.03 +/- 0.30 U/kg/day before starting CSII; 0.75 +/- 020 U/kg/day on insulin pump therapy onset; 0.76 +/- 0.18 U/kg/day at 3 months; 0.75 +/- 0.21 U/kg/day at 6 months). During the follow-up 0.10 events of diabetic ketoacidosis/patient/year were recorded. The patients exhibited no increase in BMI during the 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: CSII was safe and effective in improving short- and medium-term metabolic control in young adults, adolescents and younger children with DM.     

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion benefits quality of life in preschool-age children with type 1 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE: To compare medical, nutritional, and psychosocial outcomes of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy and multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) in preschoolers with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in a randomized controlled trial. STUDY DESIGN: Sixteen children (mean age 4.4 +/- 0.7 yr, range 3.1-5.3 yr) with T1DM were randomly assigned to CSII or MDI. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was measured monthly for 6 months. Glucose variability was measured at baseline and at 6 months using continuous blood glucose sensing. Quality of life, adverse events, and nutrition information were assessed. RESULTS: Parents of the CSII group reported a significant decrease in diabetes-related worry, while parents of the MDI group reported an increased frequency of stress associated with their child's medical care. Mean HbA1c levels from baseline (CSII 8.3 +/- 1.4%, MDI 8.0 +/- 0.8%) to 6 months (CSII 8.4 +/- 0.8%, MDI 8.2 +/- 0.4%) remained stable, and group differences were not significant. There were no significant group differences in duration of hypo- or hyperglycemic events or frequency of adverse events. CONCLUSION(S): For young children with T1DM, CSII therapy is comparable to MDI therapy with regard to glucose control but is associated with higher treatment satisfaction and improved quality of life.     

Pubertal changes in serum leptin levels in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a controlled longitudinal study

The mechanism of the pubertal delay seen in some adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus is not entirely clear. Since leptin has been implicated as a neuroendocrine modulator of puberty, we measured serum leptin levels longitudinally in 24 post-'honeymoon' patients with diabetes mellitus (M/F = 15/9) with a mean (+/- SD) age of 10.5 +/- 0.9 years and 26 controls (M/F = 15/11) with a mean age of 10.0 +/- 1.1 years. Physical examinations; serum leptin, IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-1 levels; and bone age X-rays were performed annually for up to 48 months. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured 2-4 times a year in patients with diabetes mellitus. Serum leptin levels strongly correlated with the body mass index z-scores (BMI-Z) in both controls (r = 0.666, p <0.00001) and diabetic patients (r = 0.577, p <0.00001). Girls had increased serum leptin levels for a given BMI compared to boys (p <0.005). There were no significant differences in serum leptin levels of patients with diabetes mellitus compared to controls, nor were differences seen when the groups were stratified by age, Tanner stage, or gender. There were also no significant correlations between serum leptin levels and degree of metabolic control (i.e. HbA1c) or insulin dose standardized for body weight. Although there was no significant diabetes-related or metabolic control-related delay in bone age z-score or pubertal development, there was a significant negative correlation between HbA1c and growth velocity z-score, indicating that children with poor diabetes control had modest but significant slowing of growth. It is concluded that neither pubertal development nor serum leptin levels are significantly altered in adolescents with diabetes mellitus managed with standard therapy. The potential role of leptin in initiation of pubertal development is not easily demonstrable in observational studies.     

Initiation of insulin glargine in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND: Glargine (Lantus) is a recently approved, long-acting insulin analog that is increasingly being used in children with diabetes. The aim of this retrospective chart review was to summarize our experience in starting glargine in children and adolescents with diabetes. SUBJECTS AND STUDY METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 71 children with type 1 diabetes (29 boys and 42 girls) who initiated glargine therapy to improve glycemic control between 1 June 2001 and 30 June 2002. Data were collected for 6 months before and 6 months after adding glargine. RESULTS: Subjects' mean age [+/-standard deviation (SD)] at diagnosis of diabetes was 7.5 +/- 4.1 yr. Mean age at initiation of glargine therapy was 11.5 +/- 4.9 yr. The total daily long-acting insulin dose decreased by about 20% after initiating glargine therapy. There were no significant differences in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and blood glucose control prior to and after initiating glargine therapy (HbA1c at baseline 8.9 +/- 1.6% and HbA1c after 6 months of glargine therapy was 8.9 +/- 1.5%). Overall, blood glucose concentrations did not differ significantly throughout the study. Patients who switched to glargine because of nocturnal hypoglycemia had a 65% decrease in nocturnal blood glucose reading less than 50 mg/dL. There were three seizures in the first week after initiating glargine therapy. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study suggests that glargine is at least as effective as other long-acting insulins but that care must be taken during the conversion process to avoid hypoglycemia.     

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pump treatment in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Data were reviewed from 73 consecutive medical charts of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus using insulin pumps for more than 6 months at The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada. Statistically significant differences in HbA1c (-0.8%), body mass index (+1.45 kg/m2) and total daily dose of insulin (-0.23 U/kg/day) were found between the start of pump use and evaluation 6-30 months later. There was a close correlation between the HbA1c before and after 6-30 months of pump therapy.     

Profound changes in the GH–IGF‐I system in adolescent girls with IDDM: can IGFBP1 be used to reflect overall glucose regulation?

Disturbances in the relations between insulin, growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) may be a major cause behind deteriorated metabolic control in adolescent girls with type I diabetes. These patients have increased GH secretion and low IGF-I concentrations. The aim of this study was to identify possible endocrine mechanisms behind good and poor glycaemic control in such girls, focusing on the insulin-GH-IGF-I axis. Ten girls with well-controlled insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 6.5+/-0.4% (normal range 3.9-5.2%) and nine healthy controls were investigated and compared with 11 girls with poor glucose regulation, HbA1c 10.9+/-0.4%, and their corresponding controls. Serum profiles of glucose, insulin, GH and IGF-binding protein 1 (IGFBP1) were analysed in addition to IGF-I and HbA1c. Two interesting observations were made. GH concentrations were equally elevated in the two diabetic groups regardless of metabolic control (mean 24 h GH - girls with poorly controlled diabetes 10.0+/-1.0 mU/L vs 9.8+/-1.7 - girls with well-controlled diabetes; p=ns). Likewise, the IGF-I concentrations were reduced to the same extent (233+/-19 vs 242+/-23 microg/L; p=0.75). Secondly, despite similar insulin concentrations (mean 24 h insulin - girls with poorly controlled diabetes 22.9+/-2.6 and girls with well-controlled diabetes 27.3+/-2.9 mU/L, respectively; p=0.26), there was a marked difference in IGFBP1 concentrations between the two groups with IDDM (mean IGFBP1 - girls with poorly controlled diabetes 70.5+/-9.1 microg/L vs girls with well-controlled diabetes 28.6+/-3.3; p<0.001). Despite equally elevated GH concentrations that may induce insulin resistance, the markedly lower concentrations of IGFBP1 in the well-controlled group indicate a higher hepatic insulin sensitivity in these girls compared with those with a poor control. Furthermore, in spite of similar total IGF-I concentrations, the lower IGFBP1 concentrations may result in higher IGF-I bioactivity in the well-controlled group. This may be reflected in better growth of the well-controlled group whose height of 168.7+/-0.9 vs 163.6+/-1.2 cm was significantly different (p<0.004). IGFBP1 may be a marker of overall insulinization in adolescents with type 1 diabetes, independent of the absolute insulin dose used for therapy.