Psychiatric training in primary care medicine residency programs. A national survey

The authors conducted a national survey to investigate the current status of psychiatric training in primary care/internal medicine residencies. Fifty-four residency training directors completed and returned the survey. The survey results show that an average of 99 hours (69.5 hours clinical plus 29.8 hours didactics) is devoted to psychiatric training during the 3 years of primary care/internal medicine residency training. Responding residency training directors indicated that psychiatric training is important (an average of 7 out of 10 on a 10-point rating scale), and 63% of respondents indicated that more training in psychiatry is needed.     

Montefiore Medical Center in The Bronx, New York: improving health in an urban community.

The author calls on academic medical centers that serve urban communities to go beyond the traditional mission of patient care, teaching, and research by accepting responsibility to build community-based care systems that are capable of improving the health of underserved populations within their reach. The experience of Montefiore Medical Center in the Bronx, New York, is presented to illustrate the nature, scope, and complexity of the undertaking that is required. Eight initiatives are described: expanding the primary care network, creating The Children's Hospital at Montefiore and the Child Health Network, responding to the needs of other high-risk populations, integrating the network with health information technology, using care-management systems to improve quality, reinforcing ethical allocation of resources, building teaching and research into the network, and preserving community vitality. The author believes that the current health care environment offers opportunities that may help to stimulate change in the direction of community-based systems. Managed care provides financial incentives to academic centers that are willing to accept risk and responsibly manage the care of a defined community, and advanced information technologies can support them in that endeavor. The author concludes that for academic medical centers with the proper systems in place, accepting responsibility for the community is not only the right thing to do, it is the strategic thing to do.     

Telemental health training and delivery in primary care: A case report of interdisciplinary treatment

Telehealth can overcome access and availability barriers that often impede receiving needed mental health services. This case report describes an interdisciplinary approach to treatment for an individual with chronic physical health conditions and comorbid mental health concerns, which resulted in high utilization (and associated costs) of preventable emergency services. The report describes clinical case progression on anxiety symptoms and emergency service utilization while concurrently highlighting telehealth-specific practice implications, especially as they pertain to training settings.     

Teaching and improving quality of care in a primary care internal medicine residency clinic.

Purpose Learning and applying quality of care principles are essential to practice-based learning and improvement. The authors investigated the feasibility and effects of a self-directed curriculum in quality of care for residents. Method In 2001-02, 13 second-year residents at two community-based outpatient clinics in the Yale University primary care internal medicine residency program were asked to participate in a trial of a quality improvement curriculum (intervention group). Thirteen third-year residents in the same residency program served as the comparison group. The curriculum consisted of readings in quality of care, weekly self-reflection with a faculty member, completion of a commitment to change survey, and medical record audits. Study outcome measures were patient level quality of care measures for diabetes, satisfaction with the curriculum, and self-reported behavioral changes. Results In the follow-up, patients of the intervention group were significantly more likely to have received a monofilament foot examination and baseline electrocardiogram than were patients of the comparison group. When comparing the change between baseline and follow-up, patients for the second-year residents showed significantly more improvement in hemoglobin A1c and LDL cholesterol levels and Pneumovax administration than did patients of the comparison group. All residents in the intervention group were highly satisfied with the curriculum. Thirty-five of 54 residents' personal commitments to change were either partially or fully implemented six months after the curriculum. Conclusions A multifaceted curriculum in quality improvement led to modest improvements in the care of diabetic patients and meaningful changes in self-reported practice behaviors. Future research should include more focus on the microsystems of residency outpatient experiences.     

Obstetrician-gynecologists and primary care: training during obstetrics-gynecology residency and current practice patterns.

PURPOSE: To assess obstetrician-gynecologists' perceptions of their residency training in primary care, document health issues assessed at annual visits, and identify practice patterns of both generalist and specialist obstetrician-gynecologists. METHOD: Questionnaires were mailed to a random sample of 1,711 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Young Fellows in September 2005. Information was gathered on perceptions about adequacy of residency training, how well training prepared obstetrician-gynecologists for current practice, and typical practice patterns for various medical diagnoses. Data were analyzed using univariate analysis of variance, t tests, and chi-square tests. RESULTS: Of 935 respondents (55% response rate), physicians estimated that 37% of private, nonpregnant patients rely on them for routine primary care. Approximately 22% report that they needed additional primary care training, specifically for metabolism/nutrition and dermatologic, cardiovascular, and psychosexual disorders. A wide range of topics, except for immunizations, were typically discussed at annual visits. Patients with pulmonary diseases, vascular diseases, and nongenital cancers were most often referred to specialists, whereas patients with urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted infections, or who are menopausal are most often managed totally. Self-identification as a generalist or specialist was associated with some practice patterns. Respondents were neutral about the role of primary care in obstetrics-gynecology residency training. CONCLUSIONS: For several primary care issues, obstetrician-gynecologists assumed sole management for obstetric patients but deferred to a primary care physician for gynecological patients. There is a continuing need for primary care training in obstetrics-gynecology residency, although it is unclear whether current training is adequate to meet their needs.     

The integrative family medicine program: an innovation in residency education.

The Integrative Family Medicine (IFM) Program is a four-year combined family medicine residency program and integrative medicine fellowship. It was created in 2003 to address the needs of four constituencies: patients who desire care from well trained integrative physicians, physicians who seek such training, the health care system which lacks a conventional integrative medicine training route, and educational leaders in family medicine who are seeking new strategies to reverse the declining interest in family medicine amongst U.S. graduates. The program was designed jointly by the University of Arizona Program in Integrative Medicine (PIM) and family medicine residency programs at Beth Israel/Albert Einstein College of Medicine (AECOM), Maine Medical Center, Middlesex Hospital, Oregon Health & Science University, and the Universities of Arizona and Wisconsin. One or two residents from each of these institutions may apply, and when selected, commit to extending their training by a fourth year. They complete their family medicine residencies at their home sites, enroll in the distributed learning associate fellowship at PIM, and are mentored by local faculty members who have training in integrative medicine. To date three classes totaling twenty residents have entered the program. Evaluation is performed jointly: PIM evaluates the residents during residential weeks and through online modules and residency faculty members perform direct observation of care and review treatment plans. Preliminary data suggest that the program enhances interest amongst graduating medical students in family medicine training. The Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education Family Medicine residency review committee has awarded the pilot experimental status.     

Collaboration between an internal medicine residency program and a federally qualified health center: Norwalk Hospital and the Norwalk Community Health Center.

In 1999, Norwalk Hospital and an independent, community-based board collaboratively developed the Norwalk Community Health Center (the NCHC). The objectives of the affiliation were to (1) create a new, free-standing, high-quality community health center, (2) optimize grant and clinical revenue, (3) create an ideal venue for ambulatory care training for residents, and (4) replace the traditional and increasingly inefficient hospital-based primary care clinics. The hospital transferred all of its primary care clinical activity to the new community health center and provides an ongoing financial subsidy of the NCHC operations via a forgivable loan. In exchange, the NCHC granted Norwalk Hospital 24% of the seats on its board of directors and purchases all primary care provider services from the hospital. For adult medicine, the contract providers are exclusively Norwalk Hospital internal medicine residents and faculty. Contract charges are based not upon actual staffing but upon a standard formula relating full-time-equivalent providers to patient visits. The new 10,000 square-foot NCHC contains 2,500 square feet of additional integrated space, rented from the NCHC by Norwalk Hospital, which supports the residency education program. The NCHC opened in April 1999 and received FQHC status in November 1999. Adult medicine volume increased 30%, from 36.8 daily visits in the old hospital-based clinics to 48.0 at the NCHC. Resident and patient satisfaction are high. The NCHC now receives cost-based visit reimbursement from Medicaid and has received $1.8 million in state, federal, and local grants.     

Internal medicine-pediatrics residency training: current program trends and outcomes.

PURPOSE: Combined internal medicine-pediatrics (med-peds) residency programs have existed since 1967. Due to the rapid growth in the number and size of programs during the 1990s, most current med-peds physicians completed their residency in the last ten years, making older studies of med-peds programs obsolete. The authors sought to determine completion rates of med-peds residency programs and describe the initial career plans for five cohorts of graduating residents from combined med-peds training programs. METHOD: Program directors of all U.S. med-peds residency programs were asked to complete a Web-based survey and base their responses on the records of cohorts of residents completing their programs from 1998 through 2002. To allow sufficient time to complete both the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) and American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) certification examinations, certification status was requested only for the cohort completing training in 1998. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 92% (83/90) of the programs, reflecting 1,595 residents entering med-peds programs. Of these residents, 91% graduated from a med-peds program. Among the graduates, 82% were seeing both adults and children, 22% went on to subspecialty residencies, 21% began practice in rural or underserved areas, and 25% entered an academic position. ABIM and ABP pass rates for the 1998 cohort were 97% and 96%, respectively. Overall, 79% of the 1998 graduates are board certified in both specialties. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with previous studies, a greater proportion of residents who recently entered med-peds programs completed their dual training, and a larger percentage of graduates are seeing both adults and children. The proportion of residents entering subspecialty residencies has increased significantly, but the proportion of graduates in academic careers has remained stable.     

Benchmarks of support in internal medicine residency training programs.

PURPOSE: To identify benchmarks of financial and staff support in internal medicine residency training programs and their correlation with indicators of quality. METHOD: A survey instrument to determine characteristics of support of residency training programs was mailed to each member program of the Association of Program Directors of Internal Medicine. Results were correlated with the three-year running average of the pass rates on the American Board of Internal Medicine certifying examination using bivariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Of 394 surveys, 287 (73%) were completed: 74% of respondents were program directors and 20% were both chair and program director. The mean duration as program director was 7.5 years (median = 5), but it was significantly lower for women than for men (4.9 versus 8.1; p =.001). Respondents spent 62% of their time in educational and administrative duties, 30% in clinical activities, 5% in research, and 2% in other activities. Most chief residents were PGY4s, with 72% receiving compensation additional to base salary. On average, there was one associate program director for every 33 residents, one chief resident for every 27 residents, and one staff person for every 21 residents. Most programs provided trainees with incremental educational stipends, meals while oncall, travel and meeting expenses, and parking. Support from pharmaceutical companies was used for meals, books, and meeting expenses. Almost all programs provided meals for applicants, with 15% providing travel allowances and 37% providing lodging. The programs' board pass rates significantly correlated with the numbers of faculty fulltime equivalents (FTEs), the numbers of resident FTEs per office staff FTEs, and the numbers of categorical and preliminary applications received and ranked by the programs in 1998 and 1999. Regression analyses demonstrated three independent predictors of the programs' board pass rates: number of faculty (a positive predictor), percentage of clinical work performed by the program director (a negative predictor), and financial support from pharmaceutical companies (also a negative predictor). CONCLUSIONS: These results identify benchmarks of financial and staff support provided to internal medicine residency programs. Some of these benchmarks are correlated with board pass rate, an accepted indicator of quality in residency training. Program directors and chairs can use this information to identify areas that may benefit from enhanced financial and administrative support.     

Part-time residency training in internal medicine: analysis of a ten-year experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a ten-year experience (1983-1993) with a part-time residency curriculum. METHOD: In 1994, the authors analyzed the curriculum through interviews with graduates of a part-time residency track, surveys of faculty and graduates of a full-time residency program, and a quantitative comparison of faculty evaluations of those part-time and full-time residents. RESULTS: Both participants and full-time residents supported the part-time track and reported no adverse effect on the residency program as a whole. Analysis of faculty evaluations found that part-time residents scored significantly higher with respect to clinical skills (p = .0005) and humanistic skills (p = .0001), while there was no difference between the groups in leadership or teaching skills. CONCLUSIONS: This part-time residency curriculum provided a highly useful program track for a group of internal medicine residents with concomitant obligations, allowing them to complete their training in an uninterrupted fashion. The part-time structure did not adversely affect clinical competence and may have fostered humanistic attributes. The authors believe that this form of curriculum deserves wider consideration in residency training.     

The utilization of cross-sectional anatomy in a surgical residency training program

The education of students and residents in a surgical department involves a thorough knowledge of three-dimensional anatomical relationships in the body. In addition, the advances in new imaging modalities demand an in-depth study of cross-sectional anatomy by both students and residents. Traditionally, surgical training incorporated dissections of cadavers and the progressive involvement of the resident in the surgical theater. At the King/Drew Medical Center cross-sectional anatomy has been incorporated into the teaching program. The central focus of this instructional program utilizes problem-solving learning modules that emphasize important surgical and anatomical principles.     

Megatrends in pathology practice: implications for residency training. Ninth Conference for pathology residency program directors--a summary

The participants at the Ninth Conference for Pathology Residency Program Directors clearly identified the important trends, the problems, and the opportunities now confronted by the specialty of pathology. Equally important, the speakers identified changes that should be incorporated into residency programs if we are to provide the training and education for practice in a changing medical environment. Evaluations of the program by the participants indicated it had been a valuable conference and it should be maintained as a part of each annual American Society of Clinical Pathologists/College of American Pathologists Fall Meeting.     

The irony of osteopathic medicine and primary care.

Osteopathic medicine is strongly identified with primary care. In the past 20 years, several factors have influenced this relationship, resulting in significant changes in the postdoctoral training of doctors of osteopathic medicine (DOs). Growth in colleges of osteopathic medicine spilled over into postdoctoral programs of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), creating a number of consequences. More than ever, osteopathic physicians are filling voids in ACGME primary care residency positions left vacant by U.S. medical graduates. Many allopathic primary care residencies have created parallel-accredited (American Osteopathic Association/ACGME) programs in hopes of tapping into this supply of DOs. In turn, osteopathic training institutions have shifted their educational emphasis in support of nonprimary care residencies. As a result of these changes, there is a strong element of irony in the underlying reasons for osteopathic medicine's link to primary care, why osteopathic training institutions are emphasizing specialty residencies, and the new responsibility of allopathic programs in training the next generation of primary care DOs.     

Residency education, preventive medicine, and population health care improvement: the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Leadership Preventive Medicine approach.

In 2003, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (DHMC) inaugurated its Leadership Preventive Medicine residency (DHLPMR), which combines two years of leadership preventive medicine (LPM) training with another DHMC residency. The aim of DHLPMR is to attract and develop physicians who seek to become capable of leading change and improvement of the systems where people and health care meet. The capabilities learned by residents are (1) leadership -- including design and redesign -- of small systems in health care, (2) measurement of illness burden in individuals and populations, (3) measurement of the outcomes of health service interventions, (4) leadership of change for improvement of quality, value, and safety of health care of individuals and populations, and (5) reflection on personal professional practice enabling personal and professional development. The DHLPMR program includes completion of an MPH degree at The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice (formerly the Center for Evaluative Clinical Sciences) and a practicum during which the resident leads change to improve health care for a defined population of patients. Residents also complete a longitudinal public health experience in a governmental public health agency. A coach in the resident's home clinical department helps the resident develop his or her practicum proposal, which must then be approved by a practicum review board (PRB). Twelve residents have graduated as of July 2007. Residents have combined anesthesia, family medicine, internal medicine, infectious disease, pain medicine, pathology, psychiatry, pulmonary and critical care medicine, surgery, gastroenterology, geriatric psychiatry, obstetrics-gynecology, and pediatrics with preventive medicine.     

Psychosocial training in U.S. internal medicine and family practice residency programs.

PURPOSE: Competence in the psychosocial aspects of medical care is necessary for primary care physicians to function effectively. This study investigated the psychosocial training internal medicine and family practice residents receive in U.S. programs. METHODS: In 1996, program directors of all U.S. internal medicine (IM) and family practice (FP) residency programs were surveyed regarding the format, content, and quantity of psychosocial training provided in their programs, their opinions on topics related to psychosocial training, and demographics of their programs. RESULTS: The response rate was 61%. Ninety-nine percent of FP and 62% of IM program directors reported requiring at least one psychosocial training experience. Family practice programs required an average of 352 hours (SD +/- 175; range 27-2,664) of psychosocial training compared with 118 hours (SD +/- 272; range 0-1,050) for IM programs. Most IM and FP program directors expected residents to achieve at least basic competency in virtually all psychosocial topic areas; however, FP programs provided a greater range of psychosocial experiences. FP program directors most often identified psychologists and IM program directors most often identified internists as providing the most psychosocial training in their programs. Both IM and FP program directors considered lack of curricular time to be the main obstacle to development of psychosocial training. CONCLUSION: Residents' competence in psychosocial areas is important to both IM and FP program directors. However, content and time devoted to psychosocial training vary considerably both within and between program types.