Laparoscopic gastrostomy versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

A retrospective study was carried out at our institution to compare patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) to those who underwent laparoscopic gastrostomy (LG). There were 17 patients who had a PEG with a mean age of 81 years (43–97 years). The procedure time, including complete esophago-gastroduodenoscopy, averaged 28 min. There were four deaths (23%) in a 30-day period, but none of these were directly related to the procedure. The LG group consisted of 14 patients with a mean age of 66 years (20–94 years). Mean duration of the procedure was 18 minutes. Thirty-day mortality rate was 35% (five patients) with one death (7%) directly related to the tube. Indications for gastrostomy were similar in both groups, being predominantly inability to eat and/or recurrent aspiration. However, LG was done because of 4 technical failures, 5 patients with tumors of the head and neck, 2 patients with esophageal obstruction and radiation stenosis precluding safe PEG, and 1 patient with hiatal hernia; 2 LGs were performed at the surgeon’s preference. Outcomes for LG and PEG were comparable. LG is a suitable, safe alternative to PEG in selected patients who cannot undergo gastroscopy and should be considered the procedure of choice in patients with head and neck tumors or intrathoracic pathology that prevents PEG.     

Bedside percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

Background: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a good alternative that provides long-term nutritional support and is associated with minimal morbidity. Methods: During a 24-month period, we studied 54 critically injured patients who underwent early PEG to provide enteral nutritional support. Patients were selected due to the inability to tolerate intake by mouth secondary to multiple associated injuries, especially to the central nervous system. Results: All patients sustained multiple injuries with an average Injury Severity Score of 27. The mean Glasgow Coma Scale at the time of admission was 7 and at the time of the PEG was 10. Eleven patients (20%) had an intracranial pressure (ICP) device, and there was no significant increase in the mean ICP before, during, or after the procedure. In 63% of patients, tube feedings were interrupted for a variety of problems in the 72 h preceding the PEG, and in 70% of patients an average of five radiographs were obtained to document tube position. In 95% of patients, the nutritional goal was achieved within 48 h of PEG placement. There were one immediate and two delayed complications after PEG placement. There were two deaths, neither related to the PEG placement. Conclusions: Early PEG in critically injured patients is a safe and effective method of providing access to the GI tract for nutritional support. In patients with significant brain injuries, adequate sedation and the presence of an ICP monitor help to minimize secondary insults to the brain. Received: 5 March 1997/Accepted: 15 May 1997     

Pneumoperitoneum following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

Summary Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) has had a significant impact on enteral alimentation in patients unable to maintain adequate oral caloric intake. PEG avoids the morbidity and mortality associated with the traditional feeding gastrostomies placed by celiotomy. Several authors have documented benign, self-limiting pneumoperitoneum following PEG placement. No study has addressed whether the timing of panendoscopy in relation to gastric puncture has an effect on the incidence of post-PEG pneumoperitoneum. The authors prospectively studied 30 patients undergoing PEG. Panendoscopy was either performed before or after gastric puncture, and each patient then had abdominal radiographs to determine the presence of pneumoperitoneum. Four of 16 patients (25%) having panendoscopy prior to gastric puncture had radiographic evidence of pneumoperitoneum compared to three of 14 patients (23%) having panendoscopy following gastric puncture. The authors conclude that the timing of panendoscopy in relation to gastric puncture does not significantly effect the incidence of post-PEG pneumoperitoneum.     

A simplified technique for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

Summary Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the preferred method of establishing long-term enteral access for feeding. Many patients requiring PEG are elderly and at risk for complications. Expeditious placement of the gastrostomy tube will minimize complications, but distorted esophageal anatomy can significantly lengthen the procedure. Some endoscopists abandon conventional repeat gastroscopy in difficult cases to accelerate the procedure. The authors describe a reliable method for quick reinsertion of the endoscope which shortens time required for PEG, and may reduce complications.     

Combined endoscopic and surgical gastrostomy when percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is contraindicated

The resurgence of enteral feeding, as both a more physiologic and cost-effective means of alimenting patients, has coincided with the increased popularity of endoscopically placed gastrostomies. Indeed, numerous retrospective studies have shown that percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is superior to its surgical counterpart. There are, however, both absolute and relative contraindications to percutaneous placement. Reported here are three patients who were poor surgical candidates, yet had contraindications to percutaneous placement. Described is a method of combined endoscopic and surgical placement under local anesthesia used successfully in these patients. General anesthesia and laparotomy were not required. A 2-cm incision with endoscopic guidance was used and the gastrostomy was placed under direct vision and secured with a gastric purse string and sutured to the abdominal wall. There was no morbidity or mortality among the three cases reported. All gastrostomies were considered functional within 48 hrs. The authors feel this method is an excellent alternative when PEG is contraindicated. In addition, it may represent the safest and most effective method of gastrostomy placement in the majority of patients requiring a gastrostomy.     

Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with Stamm gastrostomy.

In a review of 125 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies (PEG) and 88 Stamm gastrostomies performed at Duke University Medical Center since 1978, the average operating room time for PEG (50 +/- 20 min) was shorter than for Stamm (96 +/- 26 min) (p less than 0.0001). General anesthesia was administered in only 13% of PEG placements compared with 64% of Stamm gastrostomies. The cost of PEG was about $1000 less than for Stamm gastrostomies. The average time after surgery until use of the feeding tube was 1.8 days for PEG compared with 3.4 days for Stamm (p less than 0.0001). The overall complication rate after PEG was 8.8% (4.0% major) compared with 23.9% for Stamm gastrostomies (10.2% major) (p less than 0.005). PEG reduces operative time, necessity for general anesthesia, expense of insertion, incidence of complications, and requires less recovery time before use. PEG is the procedure of choice for gastric feeding access.     

Ethical challenges of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a widely used procedure for patients who cannot swallow. Athough it is mostly performed for valid indications, its use in terminally ill patients is questionable. In this study, more than 30% of patients died in hospital after PEG placement and 16% died less than 30 days after placement. Strict guidelines and oversight or PEG placement are recommended. Presented as poster #216 at the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) and the International Pediatric Endosurgery Group meeting 14 March 2003     

Laparoscopically assisted antegrade percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

We describe a new technique named laparoscopically assisted antegrade percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), whereby a PEG tube is placed in the stomach with the aid of laparoscopy. The procedure is simple and avoids injury to adjacent organs that may occur with a standard PEG tube placement.     

Combined tracheostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is rapidly becoming the preferred method of long-term enteral access with minimal complications obviating the need for prolonged nasogastric or orogastric intubation. Tracheostomy is the accepted technique for long-term airway control, especially for protection against upper airway secretions and respiratory failure. Over a 14 month period, 73 percutaneous gastrostomies were inserted in 71 patients. Nine patients (12.6 percent) had previously undergone tracheostomy, and 13 patients (18.3 percent) underwent a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy immediately after tracheostomy. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia. The concomitant percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy added little time to the total procedure and was not associated with additional complications. Early experience with percutaneous gastrostomy indicates that a substantial number of patients (30.9 percent in the present study) also required tracheostomy. The tracheostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy combination completely frees the nasopharynx of indwelling tubes. Concomitant percutaneous gastrostomy should be considered in patients undergoing tracheostomy.     

Early experience with endoscopic percutaneous gastrostomy

We performed endoscopic percutaneous gastrostomy (EPG) on 22 patients. All procedures were performed using local anesthesia with intravenous diazepam sedation. Formal laparotomy was not required. The mean patient age was 58 years (range, 21 to 83 years). Indications for EPG placement included neurologic disorders in 17 patients, head and neck tumors in four patients, and esophageal disease in one patient. The mean operative time for EPG was 27.5 minutes, with a range of 11 to 60 minutes. Two major complications, a gastrocolic fistula and an intraperitoneal gastric leak, occurred early in the series. The technique has been modified with no similar complications. Pneumoperitoneum after EPG was demonstrated in eight patients without sequelae. Ileus following EPG was not observed in any patient, and enteral feedings were uniformly resumed 48 hours after tube placement. Our early experience with EPG suggests that this technique is a safe, cost-effective, and time-saving alternative to traditional gastrostomy tube placement.     

Gastroenteric fistula complicating percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

Background

Gastroenteric fistula occurs in 2% to 3% of patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). The authors identified 12 children with this major complication.

Methods

A retrospective case note review was performed.

Results

Over a 5-year period, the complication rate for gastroenteric fistula was 3.5% (12 of 343 procedures). Presentation ranged from 1 day to 25 months post-PEG insertion. Eight patients presented with acute intestinal obstruction. The gastroenteric fistulous tract involved the posterior wall of the stomach in all cases. The plain abdominal x-ray was useful in establishing the diagnosis of the gastroenteric fistula.

Conclusions

Patients with gastroenteric fistula as a complication of PEG insertion can remain asymptomatic for prolonged periods. It often is difficult to make the diagnosis. A plain abdominal x-ray is a useful diagnostic modality.     

The efficacy and limitations of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

We analyzed 64 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy procedures performed by us between 1986 and 1990. Thirty patients had neurologic disease; 16 had head and neck cancers; eight had other malignancies; two had acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; and eight had other problems. Seven patients died within 30 days of complications (n = 4) or the primary illness (n = 3). Mean follow-up was 6 months; an additional patient died of aspiration and eight others died of their underlying illness. There were 19 complications (32%). Four wound complications occurred. Nine patients developed aspiration pneumonia within 3 days of the procedure, four of whom died in the hospital. Of the 24 patients with a history of aspiration, nine experienced aspiration during or after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Patients with a history of aspiration were more likely to have perioperative aspiration pneumonia, and patients who experienced aspiration were more likely to die.     

Laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: its role in providing enteric access when percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is not possible

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) replaced open surgical gastrostomy (OSG) as the preferred method for enteric access soon after its introduction in 1980. Since that time, laparoscopic gastrostomy (LG), percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (PRG), and laparoscopic-assisted PEG (LAPEG) have been introduced. PEG and PRG have been found to be over 95 per cent successful, convenient, economical, and associated with less morbidity than OSG. However, there are patients that are not appropriate candidates for, or have failed attempts at, PEG or PRG placement. At one time, OSG was the only option left for these patients, but they may be better served by LAPEG or, in some cases, LG. LAPEG offers less morbidity than OSG by having less pain and wound complications, and potentially may avoid the use of general anesthesia. We present a series of patients that underwent successful LAPEG placement after an unsuccessful attempt at PEG placement, and we describe its role in patient care.     

Decompressive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in nonmalignant disease

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is the standard for long-term enteral access. It can provide enteral nutrition or gastrointestinal decompression. Utilization of the gastrostomy for decompression has traditionally been reported in the setting of malignant obstruction. However, decompressive gastrostomy can play a role in the treatment of nonmalignant bowel dysfunction as well. METHODS: Over a 2-year period, 20 of 121 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies attempted by this surgical endoscopist were for gastrointestinal decompression. RESULTS: Eleven of 18 gastrostomies successfully placed for decompression were for benign conditions. In 5 patients with fistulous disease, the purpose of decompression was to divert the gastrointestinal tract until operative repair. Four of these patients have since undergone definitive surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This series presents the successful use of the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for decompression of nonmalignant conditions. In such scenarios, the drainage gastrostomy can be employed as a bridge to future surgery, or as a means of long-term decompression for bowel dysfunction.     

Complications after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy removal.

We report two cases of complications after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) removal. The first was persistence of a gastrocutaneous fistula that required operative closure. The second patient developed pneumoperitoneum after an attack of vomiting 3 weeks after PEG removal. Laparotomy showed separation of the stomach from the posterior abdominal wall, with peritonitis. These cases highlight the need for careful monitoring of patients even after tube removal.