Evaluation of methods of archwire ligation on frictional resistance

The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of elastomeric type and stainless steel (SS) ligation on frictional resistance using a validated method. To assess the validity of the new test system to measure mean frictional forces, SS and TMA wires, each with dimensions of 0.017 x 0.025 and 0.019 x 0.025 inches, were used in combination with a self-ligating Damon II bracket or a conventional preadjusted edgewise premolar SS bracket without ligation. Four types of elastomeric module, purple, grey, Alastik or SuperSlick, and a pre-formed 0.09 inch SS ligature were then assessed as methods of ligation using preadjusted edgewise premolar SS brackets. The specimens were tested on a Nene M3000 testing machine, with a crosshead speed of 5 mm/minute and each test run lasted for 4 minutes. Each bracket/wire combination with each method of ligation was tested 10 times in the presence of human saliva and the mean frictional force was recorded. The mean frictional forces were compared using three-way analysis of variance. The Damon II self-ligating bracket and unligated conventional SS bracket produced negligible mean frictional forces with any of the wires tested. For the 0.017 x 0.025 SS, 0.019 x 0.025 SS or 0.019 x 0.025 inch TMA wires, SS ligatures produced the lowest mean frictional forces. With the 0.017 x 0.025 TMA wire, purple modules produced the lowest mean frictional force. There was no consistent pattern in the mean frictional forces across the various combinations of wire type, size and ligation method. Under the conditions of this experiment, the use of passive self-ligating brackets is the only method of almost eliminating friction.     

Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model

The friction generated by various bracket-archwire combinations previously has been studied using in vitro testing models that included only one or three brackets. This study was performed using a specially designed apparatus that included 10 aligned brackets to compare the frictional resistance generated by conventional stainless steel brackets, self-ligating Damon SL II brackets and Time Plus brackets coupled with stainless steel, nickel-titanium and beta-titanium archwires. All brackets had a 0.022-inch slot, and five different sizes of orthodontic wire alloys used. Each bracket-archwire combination was tested 10 times, and each test was performed with a new bracket-wire sample. Time Plus self-ligating brackets generated significantly lower friction than both the Damon SL II self-ligating brackets and Victory brackets. However, the analysis of the various bracket-archwire combinations showed that Damon SL II brackets generated significantly lower friction than the other brackets when tested with round wires and significantly higher friction than Time Plus when tested with rectangular archwires. Beta-titanium archwires generated higher frictional resistances than the other archwires. All brackets showed higher frictional forces as the wire size increased. These findings suggest that the use of an in vitro testing model that includes 10 brackets can give additional interesting information about the frictional force of the various bracket-archwires combinations to the clinician and the research worker.     

Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys

This investigation was designed to determine the effects of wire size and alloy on frictional force generated between bracket and wire during in vitro translatory displacement of bracket relative to wire. Stainless steel (SS), cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr), nickel-titanium (NiTi), and beta-titanium (beta-Ti) wires of several sizes were tested in narrow single (0.050-inch), medium twin (0.130-inch) and wide twin (0.180-inch) stainless steel brackets in both 0.018- and 0.022-inch slots. The wires were ligated into the brackets with elastomeric ligatures. Bracket movement along the wire was implemented by means of a mechanical testing instrument, and frictional forces were measured by a compression cell and recorded on an X-Y recorder. beta-Ti and NiTi wires generated greater amounts of frictional forces than SS or Co-Cr wires did for most wire sizes. Increase in wire size generally resulted in increased bracket-wire friction. The wire size-alloy interaction on the magnitude of bracket-wire friction was statistically significant (p less than 0.005). With most wire sizes and alloys, narrow single brackets were associated with lower amounts of friction than wider brackets were. The levels of frictional forces in 0.018-inch brackets ranged from 49 gm with 0.016-inch SS wires in narrow single brackets to 336 gm with 0.017 x 0.025-inch beta-Ti wires in wide twin brackets. Similarly for 0.022-inch brackets, frictional forces ranged from 40 gm with 0.018-inch SS wires in narrow single brackets to 222 gm with 0.019 x 0.025-inch NiTi wires in wide twin brackets.     

Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.

The purpose of the study was to measure and compare the level of frictional resistance generated between conventional ceramic brackets (Transcend Series 6000, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif), ceramic brackets with stainless steel slot (Clarity, 3M Unitek), conventional stainless steel brackets (Victory Series, 3M Unitek), and 3 different orthodontic wire alloys: stainless steel (stainless steel, SDS Ormco, Glendora, Calif), nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti, SDS Ormco), and beta-titanium (TMA, SDS Ormco). All brackets had a 0.022-in slot, and orthodontic wire alloys were tested in 3 different sections: 0.016 in, 0.017 x 0.025 in, and 0.019 x 0.025 in. Each of the 27 bracket-archwire combinations was tested 10 times, and each test was performed with a new bracket-wire sample. Static and kinetic friction were measured on a specially designed apparatus. All data were statistically analyzed (analysis of variance and Scheffé for the bracket effect, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney for the alloy and section effects). Metal-insert ceramic brackets generated significantly lower frictional forces than did conventional ceramic brackets, but higher values than stainless steel brackets, in agreement with the findings of the few previous reports. Beta-titanium archwires had higher frictional resistances than did stainless steel and nickel-titanium archwires. No significant differences were found between stainless steel and nickel-titanium archwires. All the brackets showed higher static and kinetic frictional forces as the wire size increased. Metal-insert ceramic brackets are not only visually pleasing, but also a valuable alternative to conventional stainless steel brackets in patients with esthetic demands.     

Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.

This study measured and compared the level of frictional resistance generated between stainless steel self-ligating brackets (Damon SL II, SDS Ormco, Glendora, Calif), polycarbonate self-ligating brackets (Oyster, Gestenco International, G?thenburg, Sweden), and conventional stainless steel brackets (Victory Series, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif), and 3 different orthodontic wire alloys: stainless steel (Stainless Steel, SDS Ormco), nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti, SDS Ormco), and beta-titanium (TMA, SDS Ormco). All brackets had a.022-in slot, whereas the orthodontic wire alloys were tested in 3 different sections:.016,.017 x.025, and.019 x 0.025 in. Each of the 27 bracket and archwire combinations was tested 10 times, and each test was performed with a new bracket-wire sample. Both static and kinetic friction were measured on a custom-designed apparatus. All data were statistically analyzed (Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests). Stainless steel self-ligating brackets generated significantly lower static and kinetic frictional forces than both conventional stainless steel and polycarbonate self-ligating brackets, which showed no significant differences between them. Beta-titanium archwires had higher frictional resistances than stainless steel and nickel-titanium archwires. No significant differences were found between stainless steel and nickel-titanium archwires. All brackets showed higher static and kinetic frictional forces as the wire size increased.     

�����в��봫ͳ�вۻ��������ĶԱ�ʵ���о�

目的对自锁托槽与传统托槽滑动阻力的大小及变化规律进行对比研究。方法本研究于2011年9—12月在山西医科大学口腔医院和太原理工大学应用力学与生物医学研究所共同完成。根据人体实际弹性模量比例制作含牙周膜的上颌仿真模型,测试自锁托槽和传统托槽分别与0．016英寸、0．018英寸的镍钛丝和0．017英寸×0．022英寸、0．018英寸×0．025英寸、0．019英寸x0．025英寸的不锈钢方丝匹配时的滑动阻力大小。结果使用同种弓丝时,滑动阻力由小到大排列：DamonQ被动自锁托槽〈Tomy主动自锁托槽〈传统金属托槽,两两比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。同一种托槽情况下,除0．019英寸×0．025英寸不锈钢方丝外,其余滑动阻力都随弓丝直径的增大而增大,且两两比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论临床实践中托槽类型与弓丝的匹配对滑动阻力的影响十分重要,从而实现牙齿的快速有效移动。     

Dimensional accuracy of ceramic self-ligating brackets and estimates of theoretical torsional play

Objective:To ascertain the dimensional accuracies of some commonly used ceramic self-ligation brackets and the amount of torsional play in various bracket–archwire combinations.Materials and Methods:Four types of 0.022-inch slot ceramic self-ligating brackets (upper right central incisor), three types of 0.018-inch ceramic self-ligating brackets (upper right central incisor), and three types of rectangular archwires (0.016 × 0.022-inch beta-titanium [TMA] (Ormco, Orange, Calif), 0.016 × 0.022-inch stainless steel [SS] (Ortho Technology, Tampa, Fla), and 0.019 × 0.025-inch SS (Ortho Technology)) were measured using a stereomicroscope to determine slot widths and wire cross-sectional dimensions. The mean acquired dimensions of the brackets and wires were applied to an equation devised by Meling to estimate torsional play angle (γ).Results:In all bracket systems, the slot tops were significantly wider than the slot bases (P < .001), yielding a divergent slot profile. Clarity-SLs (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) showed the greatest divergence among the 0.022-inch brackets, and Clippy-Cs (Tomy, Futaba, Fukushima, Japan) among the 0.018-inch brackets. The Damon Clear (Ormco) bracket had the smallest dimensional error (0.542%), whereas the 0.022-inch Empower Clear (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, Wis) bracket had the largest (3.585%).Conclusions:The largest amount of theoretical play is observed using the Empower Clear (American Orthodontics) 0.022-inch bracket combined with the 0.016 × 0.022-inch TMA wire (Ormco), whereas the least amount occurs using the 0.018 Clippy-C (Tomy) combined with 0.016 × 0.022-inch SS wire (Ortho Technology).     

Frictional forces between lingual brackets and archwires measured by a friction tester

Frictional resistance tends to rapidly increase as the angle between a bracket and an archwire increases beyond a critical angle. The purpose of this study was to determine a new measuring method with a pin on disk friction tester for the measurement of the frictional force between lingual brackets and archwires. A lingual bracket is different from a labial bracket in dimensions and in some clinical aspects. The influence of artificial saliva was also surveyed. Two brands of lingual brackets and one brand of labial standard bracket with an 0.018-inch slot size were used. Archwires of three alloys (stainless steel [SS], Ormco; beta-Titanium [TM], Ormco; cobalt-chrome, [EL], RMO) with 0.016 x 0.022- and 0.017 x 0.025-inch dimensions were used. Measurements were conducted with an angular velocity of 0.6 degrees/s for 90 seconds and a normal force of 100 g at 25 degrees C in a dry and 34 degrees C in an artificial saliva environment. For SS and EL archwires, the frictional force with the FJT bracket was greater than that with ORM bracket (P < .01). Compared with SS and TM archwires, 0.016 x 0.022-inch EL archwire showed a higher frictional force with two lingual brackets (P < .01). Significant differences in frictional force existed between dry and artificial saliva environments (P < .05), and the effects varied by the bracket-archwire couples. The estimated critical contact angles were greater than the theoretical values. This new method can be a useful protocol for measurement of frictional force because it can measure the frictional force under the conditions of continuous angular change between bracket and archwire.     

Torque expression of self-ligating brackets compared with conventional metallic, ceramic, and plastic brackets

The purpose of this research was to investigate the torque capacity of active and passive self-ligating brackets compared with metallic, ceramic, and polycarbonate edgewise brackets. Six types of orthodontic brackets were included in the study: the self-ligating Speed and Damon2, the stainless steel (SS), Ultratrimm and Discovery, the ceramic bracket, Fascination 2, and the polycarbonate bracket, Brillant. All brackets had a 0.022-inch slot size and were torqued with 0.019 x 0.025-inch SS archwires. For this purpose, the labial crown torque of an upper central incisor was measured in a simulated intraoral clinical situation using the orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS). A torque of 20 degrees was applied and the correction of the misalignement was simulated experimentally with the OMSS. Each bracket/wire combination was measured five times. Maximum torquing moments and torque loss were determined. The results were analysed with one-way analysis of variance, with the bracket serving as the sole discriminating variable, and the Tukey test at the 0.05 level of significance. The ceramic bracket (Fascination 2) presented the highest torquing moment (35 Nmm) and, together with a SS bracket, the lowest torque loss (4.6 degrees). Self-ligating, polycarbonate, and selective metallic brackets demonstrated almost a 7-fold decreased moment developed during insertion of a 0.019 x 0.022-inch SS wire into a 0.022-inch slot and a 100 per cent increase in loss.     

Self-Ligation Esthetic Brackets with Low Frictional Resistance

Objective:To test the frictional resistance forces (FRS) generated between several archwires and (1) interactive self-ligating (ISL) brackets and (2) conventionally ligated (CL) brackets.Materials and Methods:Frictional forces produced between three different archwire combinations and self-ligating (SL) brackets (ceramic and metal-slot or all-metal) and CL brackets (metal or ceramic) were evaluated in a dry environment. The three ISL brackets tested were In-Ovation-C, In-Ovation-R, and Damon 3. The three CL brackets were Mystique with Neo Clip, Clarity, and Ovation. Each bracket was tested with 0.020″ SS, 0.019″ × 0.025″ SS and 0.018″ × 0.018″ coated SS.Results:The ISL brackets generally exhibited the lowest frictional forces irrespective of the bracket material and the wire size, and CL brackets exhibited consistently higher frictional forces. Mystique with Neo Clip produced the lowest frictional resistance of all brackets. The In-Ovation-C brackets demonstrated significantly lower frictional resistance than the SL brackets In-Ovation-R and Damon 3 as well as the CL brackets Clarity and Ovation.Conclusions:The ISL ceramic brackets produced the lowest frictional resistance of all the self-ligating brackets. The CL ceramic brackets produced the greatest friction.     

Friction produced by types of elastomeric ligatures in treatment mechanics with the preadjusted appliance

The objective was to compare the frictional forces generated by new nonconventional passive elastomeric ligatures (NCL) and conventional elastomeric ligatures (CL) under dry conditions. An experimental model reproducing the right buccal segment of the upper arch and consisting of five stainless steel 0.022-inch preadjusted brackets (from the second premolar through the central incisor) was used to assess both static and kinetic frictional forces produced by NCL and CL. The frictional forces generated by the 0.019 x 0.025-inch stainless steel wire with the two types of elastomeric ligatures were recorded by sliding the wire into the aligned brackets. The friction produced by the 0.014-inch superelastic nickel titanium wire was evaluated both in the presence of aligned brackets and of three-mm misaligned canine bracket. The amount of both static and kinetic frictions were minimal (<10 g) in the NCL group in the presence of aligned brackets with both types of wires, whereas it ranged from a minimum of 95.6 g for the 0.014-inch superelastic nickel titanium wire to a maximum of 590.7 g for the 0.019 x 0.025-inch stainless steel wire when using CL. The amount of both static and kinetic frictions in the presence of a misaligned canine bracket in the NCL group were less than half of that shown by the CL group. A recently developed passive ligature system is able to produce significantly lower levels of frictional forces in vitro when compared with conventional elastomeric modules.     

Which orthodontic archwire sequence? A randomized clinical trial

The aim of this study was to compare three orthodontic archwire sequences. One hundred and fifty-four 10- to 17-year-old patients were treated in three centres and randomly allocated to one of three groups: A = 0.016-inch nickel titanium (NiTi), 0.018 x 0.025-inch NiTi, and 0.019 x 0.025-inch stainless steel (SS); B = 0.016-inch NiTi, 0.016-inch SS, 0.020-inch SS, and 0.019 x 0.025-inch SS; and C = 0.016 x 0.022-inch copper (Cu) NiTi, 0.019 x 0.025-inch CuNiTi, and 0.019 x 0.025-inch SS. At each archwire change and for each arch, the patients completed discomfort scores on a seven-point Likert scale at 4 hours, 24 hours, 3 days, and 1 week. Time in days and the number of visits taken to reach a 0.019 x 0.025-inch SS working archwires were calculated. A periapical radiograph of the upper left central incisor was taken at the start of the treatment and after placement of the 0.019 x 0.025-inch SS wire so root resorption could be assessed. There were no statistically significant differences between archwire sequences A, B, or C for patient discomfort (P > 0.05) or root resorption (P = 0.58). The number of visits required to reach the working archwire was greater for sequence B than for A (P = 0.012) but this could not be explained by the increased number of archwires used in sequence B.     

Intrabracket space and interbracket distance: critical factors in clinical orthodontics

The engineers who designed the Houston Astrodome, Walter Moore and Associates, were engaged to study the effect that different edgewise appliances have on the function of orthodontic beams or wires. They were supplied with tooth width, bracket width, wire size, slot size information, and stainless steel wire specifications. With these data their computer was programmed to model each appliance as a simple beam reflecting its different support conditions. In the study the 0.018, 0.022, and 0.016-inch traditionally slotted appliances were tested in single and twin brackets. In addition the 0.016-inch bimetric appliance (0.016 inch on anterior teeth, 0.022 inch on posterior teeth) was tested. The following wires were used for testing: 0.016 x 0.022 inch, 0.017 x 0.022 inch, 0.018 x 0.025 inch (0.018 inch); 0.018 x 0.025 inch, 0.019 x 0.025 inch, 0.022 x 0.028 inch (0.022 inch); 0.014 x 0.018 inch, 0.015 x 0.019 inch, 0.016 x 0.022 inch (0.016 inch and bimetric). The results as stated in the conclusion statement by Rick Horn, PhD, of Walter Moore and Associates, are (1) for a given appliance and wire size, the amount of deflection allowable at permanent set decreases with decreasing size of teeth; (2) for a given appliance and wire size, the force imparted to the teeth at permanent set increases with decreasing size of teeth; (3) for a given appliance, the amount of deflection at permanent set decreases with increasing wire size; (4) for a given appliance, the force imparted to the teeth at permanent set increases with increasing wire size; (5) the amount of deflection allowable at permanent set is larger for single brackets than double brackets and larger for bimetric brackets than single brackets; (6) the force imparted to the teeth at permanent set is smaller for single brackets than double brackets and smaller for bimetric brackets than single brackets; and (7) of the six types of appliances examined, the bimetric appliance is the most flexible, allowing the most deflection at permanent set with the smallest force imparted to the teeth. This study supports the following thesis: the only way to take advantage of smaller wires and thereby have an appliance deliver maximum resiliency with lighter forces and not loose control is through differential slot sizing.     

A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires

An in vitro study of simulated canine retraction was undertaken to evaluate the difference in frictional resistance between stainless steel arch wires and steel and ceramic brackets with elastomeric, steel, and self-ligation. Each bracket slot was 0.018 x 0.025 inch. The arch wires used were 0.014-inch, 0.016-inch, 0.018-inch, 0.016 x 0.016-inch, and 0.016 x 0.22-inch stainless steel. A testing apparatus was designed to attempt to simulate the clinical situation in which teeth tip slightly while they slide along the arch wire. Under these testing conditions, the self-ligating steel bracket did not demonstrate less friction than the elastic or steel-ligated stainless steel brackets. For most wire sizes, elastomer-ligated ceramic brackets demonstrated the greatest friction when compared with other bracket/ligation technique combinations. The clinical significance of this study becomes apparent when stainless steel brackets are used on the posterior teeth and ceramic brackets are used on the anterior teeth. If sliding mechanics are used, the anterior teeth may be more resistant to movement than the posterior teeth because of the greater friction of the ceramic brackets. This could result in more posterior anchorage loss than would be expected if only one type of bracket were used.     

A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.

Abstract

This ex-vivo study compared the static frictional resistance of three self-ligating brackets with a conventional steel-ligated Ultratrimm bracket. The effects of archwire size (0.020, 0.019 x 0.025 and 0.021 x 0.025-inch), bracket/archwire angulation (0, 5 and 10 degrees) and the presence of unstimulated human saliva were investigated. The study demonstrated that both increases in wire size and bracket/archwire angulation resulted in increased static frictional resistance for all bracket types tested, with the presence of saliva having an inconsistent effect. Mobil-Lock Variable-Slot had the least friction for all wires for 0 degree angulation. However, with the introduction of angulation, the values were comparable to those of the other brackets. Activa brackets had the second lowest frictional resistance, although high values were found with 0.019 x 0.025-inch wires. SPEED brackets demonstrated low forces with round wires, although with rectangular wires or in the presence of angulation, friction was greatly increased. Ultratrimm brackets produced large individual variation, confirming the difficulty in standardizing ligation force, although under certain conditions, significantly larger frictional forces were observed. In conclusion, self-ligating brackets showed reduced frictional resistance in comparison to steel ligated brackets only under certain conditions.     

Friction of orthodontic elastomeric ligatures with different dimensions

The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the effect of variations in the size of elastomeric ligatures on the static frictional resistance generated by orthodontic sliding mechanics under dry condition. Frictional forces generated by elastomeric ligatures treated with a lubricating material (silicone) were analyzed as well. An Instron testing machine was used to assess the static frictional forces of a 0.019 x 0.025-inch stainless steel rectangular wire that was ligated to a molar convertible tube and to three stainless steel 0.022-inch pre-adjusted brackets with elastomeric ligatures with different dimensions: small, medium, and large. The static friction produced by two prototypes of silicone-lubricated elastomeric ligatures was also measured. The small and medium elastomeric ligatures produced significantly less friction than the large ligatures. No statistically significant difference was found between small and medium ligatures. The decrease in frictional forces of small and medium modules had to be ascribed mainly to the smaller thickness of both ligatures with respect to large ligatures. The lubricated elastomeric ligatures generated significantly smaller frictional forces than nonlubricated elastomeric ligatures with different dimensions. The variation in the dimensions of the elastomeric ligatures is able to influence the static frictional resistance generated by orthodontic sliding mechanics in the buccal segments. The use of small and medium elastomeric ligatures determines a 13-17% decrease in static friction compared with large ligatures. Silicone-lubricated modules can reduce static friction by 23-34% with respect to the small and medium nonlubricated elastomeric ligatures and by 36-43% compared with nonlubricated large ligatures.     

Measurements of the torque moment in various archwire-bracket-ligation combinations

The torque moment generated by third-order bends is important for tooth movement. The purpose of this study was to measure the torque moment that can be delivered by various archwire and bracket combinations at the targeted tooth. Stainless steel (SS) upper brackets with 0.018 and 0.022 inch slots, two sizes of nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) alloy wires, and three sizes of SS wires for each bracket were used. The wire was ligated with elastics or wire. The torque moment delivered by the various archwire-bracket-ligation combinations was measured using a torque gauge. Statistical analysis was undertaken using analysis of variance (multiple comparison tests and post hoc using Tukey's honestly significant difference test. The torque moment increased as the degree of torque and wire size increased. There was no significant difference in torque moment between the SS and Ni-Ti wires at lower or higher than 40 degrees torque. The torque moment with wire ligation was significantly larger than that with elastic ligation with 0.016 × 0.022 and 0.017 × 0.025 inch Ni-Ti wires in the 0.018 inch slot brackets and the 0.017 × 0.025 and 0.019 × 0.025 inch SS and Ni-Ti wires in the 0.022 inch slot brackets. However, there was no significant difference in torque moment between either ligation method when using the full slot size wires.