Comparing dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease

Dopamine agonists are effective in the management of both advanced and early-stage Parkinson's disease. Unfortunately, randomized head-to-head comparative studies between the many different dopamine agonists now available are sparse. Indirect comparisons of dopamine agonists show that ergot derivatives, such as pergolide and cabergoline, are as effective as non-ergot derivatives, such as ropinirole and pramipexole, in ameliorating Parkinson's disease symptoms in patients in early or advanced stages of the condition. As far as safety and tolerability are concerned, no significant differences between dopamine agonists are found. However, some specific adverse events, such as somnolence and sleep attacks, seem less frequent in monotherapy studies with pergolide than in those with the non-ergot dopamine agonists; however, because of the lack of direct-comparison studies this cannot be proved conclusively. Randomized, controlled comparative studies between dopamine agonists are necessary to verify any possible differences in their effectiveness and tolerability in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.     

Rationale for dopamine agonist use as monotherapy in Parkinson's disease

Dopamine agonists are increasingly being used in the initial treatment of patients with de-novo Parkinson's disease because they provide symptom relief and a low risk of the dyskinesia frequently associated with levodopa. Evidence is also mounting in preclinical models that dopamine agonists protect dopaminergic neurons from the toxic effects of oxidative stress and the by-products of dopamine and L-dopa metabolism. Ergot derivatives, such as pergolide, induce minor side-effects and provide significant and sustained improvements in motor function in patients with early Parkinson's disease. Dopamine agonists also appear to reduce the loss of functional dopamine transporters when used early in the disease course, and these factors combine to build a case for the use of dopamine agonists in early-stage Parkinson's disease.     

Monkeys with unilateral ventromedial tegmental lesions of the brain stem: models for Parkinson's disease and Lesch-Nyhan syndrome

1. Monkeys with surgical unilateral ventromedial tegmental lesions of the brain stem served as models for investigating abnormalities in Parkinson's disease and Lesch-Nyhan syndrome. 2. The animals exhibited some neurological deficits which are similar to those observed in Parkinson's disease or Lesch-Nyhan syndrome. 3. In monkeys with unilateral ventrolateral tegmental lesions, the levels of dopamine and the activities of catecholamine-synthesizing enzymes were reduced on the lesion side of the striatum, and hypokinesia and tremor developed on the contralateral extremities. 4. Dopa or dopamine agonists relieve tremor and evoke abnormal involuntary movements which are similar to the responses observed in patients with Parkinson's disease. 5. The antitremor effect of Dopa is potentiated by catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibition, suggesting a therapeutic potential for these types of agents. 6. Evidence was obtained that stimulation of D2 dopamine receptors by selective dopamine agonists exerts antitremor activity and evokes abnormal involuntary movements. 7. Combined administration of D1 and D2 dopamine agonists seems to enhance the antitremor activity. 8. Partial dopamine agonists exert antitremor activity and produce less severe abnormal involuntary movements than full dopamine agonists. 9. In a group of monkeys with unilateral ventromedial tegmental lesions of the brain stem the administration of mixed D1/D2 dopamine agonists results in the occurrence of self-biting behavior of the forelimb digits and spasticity of the hindlimbs and these symptoms are similar to those observed in patients with Lesch-Nyhan syndrome. 10. The self-biting behavior seems to be associated with the stimulation of central D1 dopamine receptors and therefore the possible involvement of dopamine neuronal abnormalities in Lesch-Nyhan syndrome deserves further investigation.     

Dopamine agonists and Parkinson's disease

The therapeutic use of dopamine agonists for Parkinson's disease, clinical guidelines for their introduction into antiparkinson regimens, and their range of adverse effects are reviewed. The role played by the dopaminomimetic ergots in elucidating dopamine receptor function, and laboratory methods that identify dopamine agonists, are also examined.     

Role of dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease: an update

At present, dopamine agonists play an important role in antiparkinsonian therapy since they were proved effective in the management of both advanced- and early-stage Parkinson's disease. In the latter, they are often regarded as first-choice medication to delay the introduction of levodopa therapy. Despite sharing the capacity to directly stimulate dopamine receptors, dopamine agonists show different pharmacological properties as they act on different subsets of dopamine receptors. This, in theory, provides the advantage of obtaining a different antiparkinsonian activity or safety profile with each agent. However, there is very little evidence that any of the marketed dopamine agonists should be consistently preferred in the management of patients with Parkinson's disease. Pergolide and cabergoline are now considered a second-line choice after the proven association with valvular fibrosis. Transdermal administration (rotigotine) and subcutaneous infusion (apomorphine) of dopamine receptor agonists are now available alternatives to oral administration and provide continuous dopaminergic stimulation. Continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion during waking hours leads to a large reduction in daily 'off' time, dyskinesias and levodopa daily dose. Almost all currently used dopamine agonists are able to provide neuroprotective effects towards dopaminergic neurons during in vitro and in vivo experiments. This neuroprotection may be the result of different mechanisms including antioxidation, scavenging of free radicals, suppression of lipid peroxidation and inhibition of apoptosis. However, the disease-modifying effect of these agents in Parkinson's disease remains to be ascertained.     

Dopamine agonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Dopamine agonists are highly effective as adjunctive therapy to levodopa in advanced Parkinson's disease and have rapidly gained popularity as a monotherapy in the early stages of Parkinson's disease for patients less than 65-70 years old. In the latter case, dopamine agonists are about as effective as levodopa but patients demonstrate a lower tendency to develop motor complications. However, dopamine agonists lose efficacy over time and the number of patients remaining on agonist monotherapy decreases to less than 50% after 3 years of treatment. Thus, after a few years of treatment the majority of patients who started on dopamine agonists will be administered levodopa, in a combined dopaminergic therapy, in order to achieve a better control of motor symptoms.     

Pramipexole in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: new developments

The nonergot dopamine agonist pramipexole is an efficient and safe drug for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Clinicians may favor pramipexole over other dopamine agonists because of its suggested higher tolerability with respect to peripheral dopaminergic side effects. Importantly, nonergot dopamine agonists such as pramipexole may not cause restrictive valvular heart disease and may therefore represent the first choice in patients with valvular lesions under treatment with ergot dopamine agonists. However, particular caution has to be exercised in younger Parkinson's disease patients with a shorter disease duration regarding the occurrence of sudden onset of sleep. In light of cost-effectiveness and quality-of-life issues, its final significance for the initial treatment of patients with early Parkinson's disease remains to be determined.     

How to succeed in using dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease

Dopamine receptor agonists are assuming increased importance in the treatment of both early and advanced symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, tolerability of these drugs can be a problem. Identifying patients who are at increased risk of adverse effects is central to using dopamine agonists in PD. The newer agonists, pramipexole and ropinirole, are generally adequate without levodopa for early symptoms and carry the hope for a more acceptable profile of long-term side-effects. In the patient with advanced disease, all four dopamine agonists significantly augment the response to levodopa, which reduces the problems of motor fluctuations and drug related dyskinesia. Understanding the common pitfalls when prescribing these drugs will facilitate their safety and efficacy.     

Dopamine agonists, receptor selectivity and dyskinesia induction in Parkinson's disease

Levodopa and the dopamine agonists are effective symptomatic treatments for Parkinson's disease, and all patients receive at least one of these agents during their illness. Long-term use of levodopa is commonly associated with motor complications such as dyskinesia, and both the dosing frequency and total daily dose of levodopa determine the rate of onset and severity. Dopamine agonists have gained popularity as first-line monotherapy in Parkinson's disease, as they effectively reverse motor deficits and reduce the risk of motor complications. Long-acting dopamine agonists providing continuous, rather than pulsatile, dopaminergic stimulation appear able to avoid dyskinesia induction. Current treatments act predominantly on D2 receptors, but drugs acting on both the D1 and D2 receptor families may produce an additive motor response, although this remains to be proven in patients with Parkinson's disease. Most currently used dopamine agonists are selective for D2-like receptors, with only pergolide and apomorphine potentially interacting with D1 receptor populations.     

Ergoline and non-ergoline derivatives in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

There are a large variety of dopamine agonists available. Especially de novo patients are treated with dopamine agonists to avoid dyskinesia. Dopamine agonists can be subdivided into ergoline and non-ergoline derivatives. This distinction raises the question whether there are differences in the effects to treat symptoms, not only in the side effects between the individual dopamine agonists but also between these two groups. Pergolide is now considered a second line drug because of its particularly high tendency towards valvular heart disease. Some authors claim that all ergoline-derivatives may cause this problem, while own results do not necessarily support this view. We recommend performing echocardiography on those patients being treated with an ergot-derivative. New data support the view that all dopaminergic drugs may cause somnolence and that there is no preference for non-ergots. It may be that the number of gamblers is slightly higher among patients treated with pramipexole than in others. Dopamine agonists with a high affinity to D3 receptors have a good anti-anhedonic potency. In cell culture all dopamine agonists studied so far show neuroprotective properties in cell culture. The introduction of a slow-release formulation for ropinirole and the rotigotine and lisuride patches have opened new ways of continuous dopamine receptor stimulation. Taken together, dopamine agonists show individual properties and there are differences between ergot and non-ergot derivatives.     

Dopamine agonists and neuroprotection in Parkinson's disease

Dopamine agonists are effective in reversing the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). They have also shown that they can delay or prevent the onset of motor complications associated with levodopa use. Recent attention has focused on the possible role for dopamine agonists in neuroprotection. Numerous studies have demonstrated that a variety of dopamine agonists can protect dopaminergic neuronal function in several toxin model systems. Pramipexole in particular has shown efficacy in reducing toxicity to MPTP, MPP, rotenone and 6-hydroxydopamine. Recent studies in early PD using imaging parameters as a surrogate marker of dopaminergic neuronal integrity have shown that pramipexole and ropinirole can apparently retard the rate of cell loss. These observations are of considerable interest, but additional studies are required to confirm a neuroprotective function for these dopamine agonists.     

Pleuropulmonary fibrosis after long-term treatment with the dopamine agonist pergolide for Parkinson Disease

Dopamine agonists are increasingly used in the treatment of Parkinson disease, but they may cause serious adverse effects. In December 1983, symptoms of Parkinson disease developed in a 55-year-old man with no history of pulmonary disease, smoking, or asbestos exposure. He began treatment with dopamine agonists bromocriptine mesylate (in 1984) and pergolide mesylate (in 1989). In late 2000, pulmonary symptoms developed. Chest radiographs and computed tomographic findings showed a mass in the right upper lobe and effusion. A biopsy specimen showed pleural and parenchymal fibrosis. This syndrome resolved after cessation of pergolide therapy and a switch to pramipexole dihydrochloride. This case draws attention to the association of long-term ergot dopamine agonist therapy with pleuropulmonary fibrosis, which can develop as late as 11 years after the initiation of therapy. We also review evidence that the risk of this complication is substantially lower with the newer nonergot dopamine agonists.     

Arguments for the use of dopamine receptor agonists in clinical and preclinical Parkinson's disease

On the basis of experimental studies which have demonstrated deleterious effects of L-DOPA (L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine) in vivo and in vitro, it has been suggested that L-DOPA itself may contribute to the progression of Parkinson's disease. This hypothesis is, for many clinicians, the rationale for postponing the employment of and reducing the applied dosage of L-DOPA and for beginning therapy with dopamine receptor agonists or the monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B) inhibitor selegiline. Furthermore, clinical studies have demonstrated that early treatment with dopamine receptor agonists is associated with a lower incidence of motor fluctuations and dyskinesia. Dopamine receptor agonists exert their symptomatic effect by directly activating dopamine receptors, bypassing the presynaptic synthesis of dopamine and the degenerating nigro-striatal dopaminergic system. They can thus also be of benefit late in the therapy of the disorder. In addition, the pharmacological profile of dopamine receptor agonists suggests a possible neuroprotective effect. This paper reviews briefly the pharmacology of dopamine receptor agonists and basic knowledge concerning the dopamine receptor stimulation which underlies their therapeutic effect. Preclinical approaches for demonstrating neuroprotective effects and their clinical relevance are also discussed.     

Dopamine receptor agonists mediate neuroprotection in malonate-induced striatal lesion in the rat

Mitochondrial bioenergetic defects are involved in neurological disorders associated with neuronal damage in the striatum, such as Huntington's disease and cerebral ischemia. The striatal release of neurotransmitters, in particular dopamine, may contribute to the development of the neuronal damage. Recent studies have shown that dopamine agonists may exert neuroprotective effects via multiple mechanisms, including modulation of dopamine release from nigrostriatal dopaminergic terminals. In rats, intrastriatal injection of malonate, a reversible inhibitor of the mitochondrial enzyme succinate dehydrogenase, induces a lesion similar to that observed following focal ischemia or in Huntington's disease. In this study, we used the malonate model to explore the neuroprotective potential of dopamine agonists. Sprague-Dawley rats were injected systemically with increasing concentrations of D(1), D(2), or mixed D(1)/D(2) dopamine agonists prior to malonate intrastriatal insult. Administration of increasing doses of the D(2)-specific agonist quinpirole resulted in increased protection against malonate toxicity. Conversely, the D(1)-specific agonist SKF-38393, as well as the mixed D(1)/D(2) agonist apomorphine, conferred higher neuroprotection at lower than at higher concentrations. Our data suggest that malonate-induced striatal toxicity can be attenuated by systemic administration of dopamine agonists, with D(1) and D(2) agonists showing different profiles of efficacy.     

The putative neuroprotective role of dopamine agonists in parkinson’s disease

Parkinson's disease is probably caused by a combination of genetic and environmental factors, which trigger a cascade of events that lead to the cell death of the dopamine-containing neurons of the substantia nigra pars compacta. These processes include oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, excitotoxicity with excess of nitric oxide formation, glial and inflammatory abnormalities and apoptosis. Dopamine agonists are chemical compounds that act directly on the dopamine receptors without any previous enzymatic biotransformation. Besides their symptomatic antiparkinsonian effect, these drugs may have neuroprotective properties in Parkinson's disease through different possible mechanisms: (a) stimulation of dopamine auoreceptors, reducing thereby dopamine turnover; (b) direct antioxidant effects; (c) reduction of excitotoxicity induced by excessive subthalamic nucleus firing; (d) inhibition of mitochondrial permeability; (e) induction of trophic factors. Dopamine agonists have already shown neuroprotective effects on dopaminergic cells against a variety of neurotoxins in several in vitro and in vivo studies. Clinical studies to detect changes in the progression of the underlying neurodegenerative process in patients with Parkinson's disease treated with dopamine agonists, by assessing the dopamine terminal function in the striatum by means of PET and SPECT techniques are under way.     

Disinhibitory abnormal behavior induced by treatment of Parkinson disease

The treatment of Parkinson disease has considerably progressed in the last 20 years. However, such treatments results in the adverse event of disinhibitory abnormal behavior, which includes impulse control disorders, punding, and dopamine dysregulation syndrome. Pathological gambling is the most extensively studied among such abnormal behaviors. It has been associated with the use of dopamine agonists and its prevalence increases according to the does of the drugs. The maximum dose of the ergot dopamine agonist pergolide is 1.25 mg/day in Japan, which is a quarter of that used in Western countries. The maximum dose of the non-ergot dopamine agonist, pramipexole is 4.5 mg/day in Japan, which is the same as in Western countries. Pramipexole was launched in 2004 in Japan, and since then cases of pathological gambling associated with dopamine agonists used has been increasing. Because of the excellent health-care system in Japan, patients can easily acquire expensive dopamine agonists. Although the prevalence of these abnormal behaviors has not been studied in Japan, it could be highly proportionate to the amount of dopamine agonists. Disinhibitory abnormal behavior is also induced by deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. This technology was approved in 2000 in Japan. The mechanisms by which these behaviors are induced are different between dopamine replacement therapy and deep brain stimulation. Parkinson disease patients and their caregivers occasionally believe the disinhibitory abnormal behavior as arising from the original personality of the patient rather than as an adverse event of treatment. Neurologists should be aware of the occurrence of disinhibitory abnormal behavior in the clinical practice.     

Workshop III: late motor complications of Parkinson's disease

The aim in the current treatment of Parkinson's disease is to delay L-Dopa administration and to keep the L-Dopa dosage as low as possible. Such a treatment strategy can delay the onset of late motor complications and reduce their severity. L-Dopa remains the most potent anti-parkinsonian medication, but its use for the initial therapy of Parkinson's disease is limited to elderly patients. In all other cases, dopamine agonists, budipine, amantadine and selegiline are primarily used. With the occurrence of late motor complications continuous dopamine receptor stimulation becomes essential. In this situation, combination therapy has to be individualized, with dopamine agonists playing a key role. In addition, COMT inhibitors, budipine, amantadine and selegiline may be used. Anticholinergic drugs are of very limited importance in the current treatment of Parkinson's disease.     

Optimizing long-term therapy for Parkinson disease: levodopa, dopamine agonists, and treatment-associated dyskinesia

The treatment of Parkinson disease (PD) involves pharmacological treatment, often with levodopa or dopamine agonists, to restore the dopaminergic deficit associated with parkinsonian symptoms. Either agent provides symptom relief that becomes less effective in the course of PD, and switching or combining these agents or adding other therapies becomes necessary for symptom control. In an effort to delay the development of motor complications, dopamine agonists are often used in the initial treatment of PD. However, control of PD symptoms is superior with levodopa. Moreover, dopamine agonists are less well tolerated overall and are associated with a number of rare but serious adverse effects. In the long-term management of PD, treatment-associated dyskinesia often becomes sufficiently troublesome as to compromise the effective dosing of antiparkinsonian medication. More effective strategies for managing dyskinesia are needed.     

Treatment of Parkinson''s disease

The aim of current treatment of Parkinson's disease is to ameliorate the symptoms while seeking to lessen the potential development of late levodopa complications. To this end, there is ample evidence that the early use of dopamine agonists is beneficial in younger Parkinsonian patients but monotherapy with dopamine agonists is for only a select few. Nonergot dopamine agonists offer the potential for fewer side effects. Lower dose levodopa therapy delays the onset and reduces severity of dyskinesia and end of dose failure. However levodopa remains the treatment of choice in Parkinson's disease and should not be restricted unnecessarily in patients with disability. There is no evidence that levodopa is toxic to dopaminergic neurons in people with Parkinson's disease. As yet, no drugs are of proven neuroprotective value. Dopamine agonists, catechol-o-methyltransferase inhibitors, amantadine and apomorphine have differing but beneficial roles in the management of levodopa side effects. Ablative surgery and deep brain stimulation of thalamus, globus pallidus and subthalamic nucleus are increasingly available but choice of procedure depends not just on patient symptomatology, but also on local experience and results. Ideally, deep brain stimulation is the treatment of choice as it offers less morbidity than bilateral ablative surgery, the possibility of postoperative adjustments and the potential for reversibility if better treatments become available.