Evaluation of the interrupter technique in healthy, unsedated infants.

The interrupter technique may be used to monitor respiratory resistance and does not require active patient cooperation, but has yet to be applied in unsedated, spontaneously breathing infants. The aim of this study was to determine if the interrupter technique is feasible in spontaneously breathing infants and to investigate the influence of facemask types and analysis techniques on the interrupter resistance (Rint). Rint was measured in 14 healthy, unsedated, sleeping infants (aged 38.4 (31-56) days (mean (range)). Paired measurements were made using large volume, compliant (Mcomp) and small volume, rigid (Mrigid) facemasks. Flow and pressure were measured at the airway opening prior to- and following a brief airway occlusion (500 ms). Rint was calculated using four previously reported analysis techniques. Rint could be measured in all infants. Mcomp, independent of the analysis method significantly underestimated Rint (p<0.001). The variability and magnitude of Rint were significantly influenced by the choice of analysis method. The conclusion is that the interrupter technique is feasible in spontaneously breathing, unsedated infants. Equipment design and analysis method significantly influences interrupter resistance. Studies standardizing equipment and identifying the most appropriate analysis technique in this age group are needed.     

Observer variability of lung function measurements in 2-6-yr-old children.

The aim of this study was to assess the within-observer and between-observer variability of lung function measurements in children aged 2-6 yrs. Two observers examined 22 asthmatic children independently according to a predefined protocol. Each observer obtained duplicate measurements of respiratory resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint), respiratory resistance (Rrs,5) and reactance (Xrs,5) at 5 Hz by the impulse oscillation technique and the specific airway resistance (sRaw) by whole body plethysmography. The within-subject SD (SDw) was not significantly different in the two observers. The ratio SDw between observers/mean SDw within observers was 0.94, 1.25, 1.35 and 2.86 for Xrs,5, Rrs,5, sRaw and Rint, respectively, indicating greater between-observer variability of the latter. The systematic difference between observers assessed by the difference between observer means (expressed as a percentage of their mean value) was 11, 7, 6 and 2% for Xrs,5, sRaw, Rrs,5 and Rint, respectively. These differences were statistically significant, except that for Rint. In conclusion, specific airway resistance, impulse oscillation technique and respiratory resistance assessed by the interrupter technique measurements in young children are subject to influence by the observer, and the random variability between observers appears to be particularly great for respiratory resistance assessed by the interrupter technique. The authors suggest that the between-observer variability should be investigated when evaluating novel methods for testing lung function.     

Pulmonary function tests in preschool children with cystic fibrosis

Pulmonary function tests have rarely been assessed in preschool children with cystic fibrosis (CF). The objective of this multicenter study was to compare pulmonary function in 39 preschool children with CF (height, 90-130 cm; 16 homozygous Delta F508) and in 79 healthy control children. Functional residual capacity (helium dilution technique) and expiratory interrupter resistance (Rint(exp)) (interrupter technique) were measured. As compared with control children, children with CF had significantly higher Rint(exp), expressed as absolute values and as Z-scores (1.05 +/- 0.36 versus 0.80 +/- 0.20 kPa.L(-1). second, p < 0.0001; and 1.31 +/- 1.72 versus 0.19 +/- 0.97, p < 0.0001), and significantly lower specific expiratory interrupter conductance (1.29 +/- 0.34 versus 1.63 +/- 0.43 kPa(-1). second, p < 0.0001). The effect of the bronchodilator salbutamol on Rint(exp) was not significantly different between children with CF and control children. Rint(exp) Z-scores were significantly higher in children with CF who were exposed to passive smoke (n = 8) (p < 0.03). Children with CF and with a history of respiratory symptoms (n = 31) had significantly higher functional residual capacity Z-scores (p < 0.02) and lower specific expiratory interrupter conductance Z-scores (p < 0.04). Genotype did not influence the data. We conclude that Rint(exp) and functional residual capacity measurements may help to follow young children with CF who are unable to perform reproducible forced expiratory maneuvers.     

Specific airway resistance,interrupter resistance,and respiratory impedance in healthy children aged 2–7 years

We report data on respiratory function in healthy children aged 2–7 years in whom we measured respiratory resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint); total respiratory impedance (Zrs), respiratory resistance (Rrs), and reactance (Xrs) by the impulse oscillation technique; and specific airway resistance (sRaw) by a modified procedure method in the whole body plethysmograph. Measurements were attempted in 151 children and were successfully obtained in 121 children with a mean (SD) age of 5.3 (1.5) years; no measurements were possible in 30 children (mean age 3 (0.9) years). The repeatability of measurements was independent of the age of the subjects, and the within-subject coefficient of variation was 11.1%, 8.1%, 10.8%, and 10.2% for sRaw, Rint, Zrs, and Rrs at 5 Hz (Rrs5), respectively. All lung function indices were linearly related to age, height, and weight. A significant negative correlation with age, height, and weight was found for Rint, Zrs, and Rrs5. Xrs5 was positively correlated to age and body size. The mean values of Rint, Rrs5, Xrs5, and Zrs in children younger and older than 5 years were 1.04, 1.38, −0.5, and 1.48 kPa · L⁻¹ · s and 0.9, 1.18, −0.37, and 1.23 kPa · L⁻¹ · s, respectively. sRaw showed no significant correlation with body size or age and the mean sRaw in children younger and older than 5 years was 1.09 and 1.13 kPa · s, respectively. None of the indices of respiratory function differed between boys and girls. Xrs and Rrs exhibited a significant frequency dependence in the range of 5–35 Hz. The techniques applied in this study require minimal cooperation and allow measurement of lung function in 80% of our population of awake young children. Further studies are needed to evaluate the potentials of the presently established reference values for clinical and epidemiological purposes. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1998; 25:322–331. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

How should airways resistance be measured in young children: mask or mouthpiece?

The reproducibility and acceptability of airways resistance measurements using the interrupter technique (MicroRint) obtained using a mouthpiece were compared with those using a face mask. Fifty children aged 4-7 yrs performed four sets of six Rint measurements; two using a mouthpiece and two using a face mask with integral mouthpiece. Complete data were obtained from 45 (90%) children using the mouthpiece and 43 (86%) children using the mask. The two methods were equally repeatable with comparable intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and coefficients of variation. Mean Rint values obtained using the mouthpiece were significantly lower than those using the face mask ((mean+/-SD) mouthpiece=0.81+/-0.18 kPa x L(-1) x s, mask=0.88+/-0.24 kPa x L(-1) x s p=0.0002). Although the mean paired differences between the two methods were small (0.07 kPa x L(-1) x s), the ICC and limits of agreement confirmed that the two methods could not be used interchangeably. Sixty-seven per cent of children preferred the face mask but this was more time-consuming (p = 0.03). Children did not produce more repeatable results using their preferred method, nor did they improve with practice. Repeatable airway resistance measurements using the interrupter technique can be obtained from young children using either a mouthpiece or a face mask, but there are significant clinical and statistical differences between the results obtained.     

Interrupter resistance in preschool children: measurement characteristics and reference values

There is a need for quick, reliable, and noninvasive lung function tests to assess airway obstruction in preschool children both for pediatric pulmonary care as well as for research purposes. We studied feasibility, reproducibility, and validity of measurements of the respiratory system using the interrupter technique (interrupter resistance [Rint]) and obtained reference values in children from a general population, 2 to 7 yr of age. Accuracy was studied by comparisons of Rint with plethysmographic airway resistance (Raw) in 20 patients (7 to 14 yr) with mild to severe chronic airways obstruction and was satisfactory in patients with FEV(1) > 60% predicted. The technique proved sensitive enough to detect changes in airway caliber within a small group of 12 children who developed mild respiratory tract infections. Among children from a general population, subgroups with mild respiratory symptoms or mild respiratory disease had higher mean Rint values. Airway obstruction was better detected using expiratory rather than inspiratory interruptions, both programmed at peak tidal ventilatory flow. Reproducibility within subjects was satisfactory (intraclass correlation 0.82 and 0.79). The same applied to interobserver agreement (intraclass correlation 0.98). The interrupter technique proves to be a reliable and practical test of airway function, suitable for clinical and epidemiologic studies in preschool children.     

Pre/postbronchodilator interrupter resistance values in healthy young children

The interrupter technique estimates flow resistance. It entails occlusion of the airways during tidal breathing while flow and mouth pressure are recorded. This noninvasive technique is easy to use in young children. The aim of the present study was to measure inspiratory and expiratory interrupter resistance (Rint(insp), Rint(exp)) before and after bronchodilator administration in young healthy white children. We designed a multicenter study using a standardized procedure for Rint measurements. Centers in five French cities studied 91 children (48 boys and 43 girls; height, 92 to 129 cm; mean age 5.3 +/- 1.4 years). Mean values were not significantly different for Rint(insp) and Rint(exp) (0.78 +/- 0.21 versus 0.78 +/- 0.20 KPa x L(-1) x second). However, the difference between Rint(insp) and Rint(exp) decreased significantly with age and being positive before 5 years and negative later on (p < 0.02). Rint(insp) and Rint(exp) decreased significantly with height (Rint(insp) [KPa x L(-1) x second] = 2.289 - 1.37. 10(-2) x H [cm], Rint(exp) [KPa. L(-1) x second] = 2.021 - 1.12.10(-2) x H [cm]; p < 0.001). Bronchodilator (salbutamol) administration significantly decreased Rint(insp) and Rint(exp) (p < 0.001). Bronchodilator-induced changes (% of predicted values) in mean Rint(insp) and mean Rint(exp) were -15% (95% confidence interval, -46 to +15%) and -12% (95% confidence interval, -46 to +22%), respectively. Sex did not affect pre- or postbronchodilator values. Data from the present study may prove useful for testing lung function in young children with respiratory disorders who failed to cooperate with forced expiratory maneuvers.     

Paralysis of ventilated newborn babies does not influence resistance of the total respiratory system.

Paralysis with pancuronium bromide is used in newborn infants to facilitate ventilatory support during respiratory failure. Changes in lung mechanics have been attributed to paralysis. The aim of this study was to examine whether or not paralysis per se has an influence on the passive respiratory mechanics, resistance (Rrs) and compliance (Crs) of the respiratory system in newborn infants. In 30 infants with acute respiratory failure, Rrs was measured during paralysis with pancuronium bromide and after stopping pancuronium bromide (group A). Rrs was also measured in an additional 10 ventilated infants in a reversed fashion (group B): Rrs was measured first in nonparalysed infants and then they were paralysed, mainly for diagnostic procedures, and the Rrs measurement repeated. As Rrs is highly dependent on lung volume, several parameters, that depend directly on lung volume were recorded: inspiratory oxygen fraction (FI,O2), arterial oxygen tension/alveolar oxygen tension (a/A) ratio and volume above functional residual capacity (FRC). In group A, the Rrs was not different during (0.236+/-0.09 cmH2O x s x mL(-1)) and after (0.237+/-0.07 cmH2O x s x mL(-1)) paralysis. Also, in group B, Rrs did not change (0.207+/-0.046 versus 0.221+/-0.046 cm x s x mL(-1) without versus with pancuronium bromide). FI,O2, a/A ratio and volume above FRC remained constant during paralysis. These data demonstrate that paralysis does not influence the resistance of the total respiratory system in ventilated term and preterm infants when measured at comparable lung volumes.     

Measurement of lung function in awake 2–4-year-old asthmatic children during methacholine challenge and acute asthma: A comparison of the impulse oscillation technique,the interrupter technique,and transcutaneous measurement of oxygen versus whole-body plethysmography

This study evaluated three techniques for testing of lung function in young awake children. We compared measurements by the forced or impulse oscillation technique (IOS), the interrupter technique (IT), and transcutaneous measurements of oxygen (tcPO₂) with concomitant measurements of specific airway resistance (sRaw) during methacholine challenge in 20 stable asthmatic children, 2–4 years old. Measurements were performed with all techniques after each dose of methacholine and after inhalation of a bronchodilator. Measurements were carried out during tidal breathing using a face-mask with a built-in mouthpiece. The ranking of sensitivity was as follows: sRaw > IOS, respiratory reactance at 5 Hz (Xrs5) > tcPO₂ > interrupter resistance (Rint) > IOS, respiratory resistance at 5 Hz (Rrs5). The sensitivity of sRaw and Xrs5 was not significantly different, but both were significantly more sensitive than Rint and Rrs5; the sensitivity of tcPO₂, Rint, and Rrs5 was not significantly different. Measurements in eight of the subjects performed during an episode of acute asthma yielded comparable results in regard to the sensitivity of the techniques. Measurements improved significantly after bronchodilator administration; however, the response to bronchodilator tended to be less during acute asthma and was best demonstrated by a deterioration of tcPO₂. All the evaluated techniques reliably reflect short-term changes in respiratory function and can provide clinically useful estimates of airway function. The techniques are non-invasive, are not dependent on the active co-operation or sedation of the subjects, and therefore are well suited for routine use in young children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1996; 21:290–300. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Unsupervised self-testing of airway obstruction by forced oscillation at the patient's home.

As active patient cooperation is not required, the forced oscillation technique (FOT) could be suitable for measuring airway obstruction in routine home applications. Nevertheless, FOT has never been used at the patient's home to date. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of FOT and the reproducibility of measured respiratory resistance (Rrs) in routine patient self-testing at home. Altogether, nine asthmatic patients self-measured their Rrs with a portable FOT device and spirometry for 10-14 days, in the morning and evening, and before and after bronchodilator inhalation. During each measurement session, the patients carried out four consecutive FOT measurements. Grubbs' discordancy test for detecting outliers was used to evaluate intermeasure reliability. Only 4.9% of Rrs data reported by patients were rejected as artefacts. The coefficient of variation of Rrs was 7.9 +/- 6.3% (mean +/- SD). When compared with spirometry, the per cent change in Rrs for detecting a positive bronchodilator response showed an 83% sensitivity and 72% specificity. Unsupervised self-measurement of respiratory resistance at the patient's home provided results similar to those obtained by a technician in a lung function lab. Forced oscillation technique could be a useful tool for the routine follow-up of asthmatic patients at home.     

Lung function and short-term outcome in young asthmatic children.

The aims of this study were to investigate lung function in 2-5-yr-old stable asthmatic children consecutively referred from general practitioners and to analyse the outcome on the basis of their requirement for antiasthmatic treatment and symptoms after 1.6-4.5 yrs. Lung function was measured in 110 children with a mean+/-SD age of 3.8+/-1.0 yrs using the interruptor technique (resistance assessed using the interruptor technique (Rint)), whole body plethysmography (specific airway resistance (sRaw) and respiratory resistance (Rrs,5)and reactance at 5 Hz (Xrs,5) using the impulse oscillation technique. Rint, sRaw, Xrs,5 and Rrs,5 were suggestive of impaired lung function in 44%, 14%, 11% and 7.5% of the children, respectively, with a predominance of children aged 2-3 yrs. Sixty-five per cent were treated with inhaled steroids, and 35% were treated only with beta2-agonists as needed; lung function was not significantly different between these two groups. Outcome after 2.9+/-0.7 yrs was not significantly different between children with Rint measurements above and those children with Rint measurements within the reference range at enrolment. Of these children, 58 and 59% were currently on antiasthmatic treatment, and 40% and 49% had current symptoms, respectively. Impairment of lung function may be a common finding in stable young asthmatic children, but apparently this is not a risk factor for persistence of asthmatic symptoms.     

Components of respiratory resistance monitored in mechanically ventilated patients.

The interrupter technique is commonly adopted to monitor respiratory resistance (Rrs,int) during mechanical ventilation; however, Rrs,int is often interpreted as an index of airway resistance (Raw). This study compared the values of Rrs,int provided by a Siemens 940 Lung Mechanics Monitor with total respiratory impedance (Zrs) parameters in 39 patients with normal spirometric parameters, who were undergoing elective coronary bypass surgery. Zrs was determined at the airway opening with pseudorandom oscillations of 0.2-6 Hz at end inspiration. Raw and tissue resistance (Rti) were derived from the Zrs data by model fitting; Rti and total resistance (Rrs,osc=Raw+Rti) were calculated at the actual respirator frequencies. Lower airway resistance (Rawl) was estimated by measuring tracheal pressure. Although good agreement was obtained between Rrs,osc and Rrs,int, with a ratio of 1.07+/-0.19 (mean+/-SD), they correlated poorly (r2=0.36). Rti and the equipment component of Raw accounted for most of Rrs,osc (39.8+/-11.9 and 43.0+/-6.9%, respectively), whereas only a small portion belonged to Rawl (17.2+/-6.3%). It is concluded that respiratory resistance may become very insensitive to changes in lower airway resistance and therefore, inappropriate for following alterations in airway tone during mechanical ventilation, especially in patients with relatively normal respiratory mechanics, where the tissue and equipment resistances represent the vast majority of the total resistance.     

Diagnostic value of negative expiratory pressure for airway hyperreactivity

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine the value of negative expiratory pressure (NEP) in the assessment of methacholine bronchoprovocation testing (BPT). DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Pulmonary function laboratory in a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-nine patients with chronic cough referred from outpatient clinics for methacholine BPT. METHODS: Each subject inhaled successive doubling concentrations of methacholine (from 0.049 to 25 mg/mL) until the FEV(1) decreased for > 20% or the maximum concentration of methacholine was inhaled. NEP was measured in the sitting position during tidal breathing before and after methacholine BPT. The FEV(1) and forced oscillation airway resistance (Rrs) and interrupter airway resistance (Rint) were also obtained simultaneously. A positive BPT result was defined as a fall in FEV(1) > or = 20%. RESULT: At baseline, only five patients had expiratory flow limitation as demonstrated by NEP (EFL-N). There were 39 patients with positive BPT results, and the other 20 patients had negative results. Among the BPT-positive patients, only 13 patients (33.3%) had EFL-N after methacholine challenge. The sensitivity indexes (absolute change/SD) of FEV(1), NEP, Rrs, and Rint were 16.0 +/- 9.6%, 1.1 +/- 1.6%, 3.8 +/- 4.5%, and 5.89 +/- 4.4% (mean +/- SD), respectively. The percentage changes in FEV(1) in BPT-positive patients correlated with the percentage changes in Rrs (r = 0.419, p = 0.008) and only marginally with the percentage changes in Rint (r = 0.307, p = 0.058), but not with the changes in EFL-N (r = 0.048, p = 0.77). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that NEP at sitting position is not sensitive in the assessment of methacholine bronchoprovocation as compared to FEV(1) and airway resistance measurements.     

Measurements of resistance by the interrupter technique and of transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen in young children during methacholine challenge

Measurement of bronchial airway responsiveness requires noninvasive techniques in young children. The study was designed to examine the changes in resistance as measured using the interrupter technique (Rint) at the dose of methacholine (M) that induced a fall in transcutaneous partial pressure in O2 (P(tc)O2) > or = 20% (PD(20)P(tc)O2) in young children. Rint was calculated using the linear back-extrapolation method (Rint(L)) and the end-interrupter method (Rint(EI)). Twenty-two children (mean age, 5.2 +/- 1.1 years; range, 3.4 - 7.1 years) with nonspecific respiratory symptoms (mainly chronic cough, n = 17) were tested. P(tc)O2, Rint(L), and Rint(EI) were measured before the test, after saline challenge (baseline (B)), after each dose of M delivered by a dosimeter, and after bronchodilator (BD) inhalation. P(tc)O2 decreased significantly during M challenge, from 85 +/- 6 mmHg (B) to 62 +/- 9 mmHg (P < 0.05), and increased after BD inhalation, to 82 +/- 8 mmHg. Rint(L) and Rint(EI) increased significantly during M challenge, from 0.94 +/- 0.2 KPa/L/s and 1.11 +/- 0.19 KPa/L/s (B) to 1.27 +/- 0.35 KPa/L/s and 1.47 +/- 0.37 KPa/L/s, respectively (P < 0.05), and decreased after BD inhalation to 0.80 +/- 0.17 KPa/L/s and 0.95 +/- 0.18 KPa/L/s, respectively. Nineteen of 22 children reached the PD(20)P(tc)O2 at a dose of M ranging from 50-400 microg. At the PD(20)P(tc)O2, significant changes in Rint(L) and Rint(EI) (sensitivity index (SI) > or = 2) were found in 79% and 63% of children, respectively. We conclude that: 1) M challenge using P(tc)O2 is safe in young children; and 2) our findings are not in favor of the use of Rint as the only indicator of bronchial reaction in young children during M challenge.     

Applicability of interrupter resistance measurements for evaluation of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children

The interrupter technique is a noninvasive method for measuring air-flow resistance during tidal breathing. This method requires minimal cooperation, and is therefore promising for use in uncooperative children. The aim of this study was to evaluate applicability interrupter resistance (Rint) measurements in the assessment of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Fifty children aged 5-12 years with mild to moderate asthma were tested by exercise challenge, consisting of free outdoor running for 6 min at 80-90% of maximal predicted heart rate for age. Rint, forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), and peak expiratory flow (PEF) were measured before and 10 min after exercise. EIB was defined as a fall of 10% or more in FEV1 after exercise. The repeatability of Rint was assessed, and its response to exercise challenge was compared with current standardized methods. The mean intermeasurement coefficient of variation was 4.6% (SD, +/- 3.0%), and the repeatability coefficient was 0.056 kPa/l/sec. Eighteen (36%) of the 50 children had EIB after exercise challenge test. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.953 (95% confidence interval, 0.853-0.992; P < 0.001), and the optimal Rint cutoff value was 15.2%, producing a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 96.9%. The positive and negative predictive values were 94.1% and 93.9%, respectively. The kappa value between FEV1 and Rint was 0.83. The repeatability of Rint measurements was good, and the results of exercise challenge tests using Rint measurements have excellent agreement with the current standardized methods to detect EIB. Considering that only minimal comprehension and coordination are needed without forced breathing technique, the Rint measurement can provide a useful alternative for assessment of EIB in children unable to perform reliable spirometry.     

Measurement of airway resistance using the interrupter technique in preschool children in the ambulatory setting.

This study describes the feasibility, repeatability, and interrater reliability of the measurement of airway resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint) in children 2-5 yrs of age, and examines whether reversibility to bronchodilator can be demonstrated in wheezy children. The mean of six Rint values was taken as a measurement. If subjects could complete one measurement and then a second 15 min after bronchodilator, baseline testing and reversibility testing were considered feasible. To measure repeatability, two measurements 30 s apart and measurements before and 15 min after placebo bronchodilator were compared. Measurements by two testers were compared for interrater reliability. Change in Rint in wheezy children was measured after bronchodilator. Fifty-six per cent of 2-3-yr-olds (n=79), 81% of 3-4-yr-olds (n=104) and 95% of 4-5-yr-olds (n=88) completed baseline testing, and 53%, 71% and 91% completed reversibility testing. Baseline measurements were 0.47-2.56 kPa x L(-1) x s. Repeatabilities (2 SD of the mean differences between measurements) at 30 s in the three age bands were 0.21, 0.17 and 0.15 kPa x L(-1) x s and 0.19 kPa x L(-1) x s after placebo. Using 0.21 kPa x L(-1) x s as the threshold for reversibility, reversibility was demonstrated in most wheezy children. Interrater reliability was 0.15 kPa x L(-1) x s. Preschool children can undertake measurements of airway resistance by the interrupter technique in ambulatory settings and reversibility to bronchodilator in wheezy children can be demonstrated. This technique promises to be a useful clinical and research tool.     

Discriminative capacity of bronchodilator response measured with three different lung function techniques in asthmatic and healthy children aged 2 to 5 years

The primary aim of this study was to quantify and compare bronchodilator responsiveness in healthy and asthmatic children aged 2 to 5 yr. The secondary aim of the study was to compare discriminative capacity (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the reversibility test for the diagnosis of asthma) for each of the lung function tests applied in the study. Specific airway resistance (sRaw) as measured by whole-body plethysmography, respiratory resistance as measured with the interrupter technique (Rint), and respiratory resistance and reactance at 5 Hz (Rrs5, Xrs5, respectively) as measured with the impulse oscillation technique were assessed before and 20 min after inhalation of terbutaline from a pressurized metered-dose inhaler via a metal spacer by 92 children (37 healthy controls and 55 asthmatic subjects). The study of healthy children followed a randomized, double-blind, crossover design, whereas the study of asthmatic children was open. Baseline lung function was significantly decreased in asthmatic children as compared with healthy control subjects as reflected by all techniques used in the study. sRaw, Rint, and Rrs5, but not Xrs5, improved significantly with terbutaline as compared with placebo in healthy control subjects. Lung function improved to a significantly greater extent in asthmatic children than in control subjects as reflected by all methods. sRaw provided the best discriminative power of such a bronchodilator response, with a sensitivity of 66% and specificity of 81% at the cutoff level of a 25% decrease in sRaw after bronchodilator administration. In conclusion, bronchodilator response measured by sRaw allows a separation of asthmatic from healthy young children. This may help define asthma in this clinically difficult-to-manage group of young wheezy children. The sensitivity and specificity of the other methods used in the study were less than those of sRaw.     

Airway resistance and atopy in preschool children with wheeze and cough.

The extent to which the measurement of airways resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint) distinguishes preschool children with previous wheeze from those with no respiratory symptoms and helps to classify subjects with persistent cough, was investigated. Rint was measured before and after salbutamol treatment in 82 children with recurrent wheeze, 58 with isolated cough and 48 with no symptoms (control subjects). Their mean age (range) was 3.7 yrs (2-<5 yrs). Median baseline Rint was higher (p<0.0001) in wheezers than in either coughers or control subjects (1.16, 0.94 and 0.88 kPa x L(-1) x s(-1) respectively); coughers did not differ significantly from control subjects (p=0.14). The median ratios of baseline to post-salbutamol measurements (bronchodilator response (BDR)) in the groups differed significantly (1.40, 1.27 and 1.07, p< or =0.01 for all), suggesting that coughers occupy an intermediate position. A BDR ratio of >1.22 had a specificity and sensitivity for wheeze of 80% and 76% respectively. Twenty-eight coughers had a BDR ratio >1.22. Wheezers' immunoglobulin E was inversely related to baseline Rint. It is concluded that measurements of airway resistance by the interrupter technique are useful for classifying preschool children with respiratory symptoms and could be used to monitor the effect of interventions. The relation between atopy and airways resistance suggests that they have separate roles in preschool wheezing. Coughers with a high bronchodilator response could represent "cough-variant" asthma in children who have baseline airway resistance by the interrupter technique measurements similar to control subjects. Whether these children develop classical asthma will only be known at follow-up later in childhood.     

Evaluation of a method for assessing respiratory mechanics during noninvasive ventilation.

Noninvasive assessment of respiratory resistance (Rrs) and elastance (Ers), which is not easy with conventional methods, could be useful in the optimization of pressure support ventilation. The aim of this study was to evaluate a simple noninvasive method (Delta-inst) of measuring Rrs during nasal pressure support ventilation. Rrs and Ers (Delta-inst) were computed from inspiratory mask pressure, flow and volume recorded during pressure support ventilation. The Delta-inst method was compared with the forced oscillation technique (FOT) in seven patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and in eight healthy subjects without and with added resistance (3.1 cmH2O x s x L(-1)). Rrs measured by Delta-inst (5.2+/-1.7, 7.2+/-0.5 and 6.9+/-1.2 cmH2O x s x L(-1)) and by FOT (5.0+/-0.7, 7.6+/-0.9 and 8.1+/-2.7 cmH2O x s x L(-1)) in healthy subjects without and with added resistance and COPD, respectively, were not significantly different (p>0.05). Rrs measured by both techniques showed a significant coefficient of linear correlation (r=0.70 s) (p<0.01). In the COPD patients, the variability of Delta-inst Rrs (30%) was greater than that of FOT Rrs (21%). The agreement between Ers obtained by Delta-inst and by FOT was less than that found for Rrs. Delta-inst is a noninvasive and simple method for reliably assessing resistance. Therefore, it is useful for monitoring airway obstruction and is potentially helpful in adapting the settings for pressure support ventilation in accordance with patient mechanics.     

Several aspects of respiratory function testing in children

Some practical aspects of respiratory function testing (RFT) are reviewed with special interest on applications in preschool children. RFT may be used for diagnostic, management and follow up purposes. Children may benefit from RFT in a variety of pathological situations. Asthma and other obstructive airways diseases certainly represent the most frequent conditions. Vital Capacity and Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) may usually be obtained from age 7 on. In smaller children, the forced expiratory manoeuvre is much less successful. Non invasive measurements such as respiratory resistance (Rrs) or specific airway resistance (sRaw) may be used. Rrs is usually measured by the interrupter technique or the forced oscillation technique and sRaw by body plethysmography, not requiring the estimation of thoracic gas volume. Because much variability is introduced by the upper airways, these parameters are less suited than FEV1 to establish the degree of baseline airway obstruction. On the other hand, Rrs and sRaw may quantify reversibility of airway obstruction and/or bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Lung hyperinflation may be identified by the assessment of Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) with a dilution method. More generally lung growth may be followed up in longitudinal studies of FRC even in small children. More work is needed to standardize RFT techniques and indications in the preschool child.