Effect of bimatoprost on patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who are nonresponders to latanoprost

PURPOSE: To test the efficacy of bimatoprost 0.03% 2D for lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients affected by primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who did not respond to treatment with latanoprost 0.005% 2D. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial with a cross over design (two 30-day treatment phases with a 30-day washout phase in between). PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled. Random allocation to treatment to a single eye only of every subject. Eligibility criteria: (1) IOP > 22 mmHg in both eyes on current treatment (on three separate readings > 24 hours apart), (2) angle wide open in both eyes, (3) no pseudoexfoliation and/or pigment dispersion in either eye, (4) documented medical history consistent with < 10% IOP decrease in both eyes on 2-month treatment with latanoprost 0.005% every day. METHOD: The following variables were measured at each study visit: (1) IOP (Goldmann applanation tonometry, 5 readings, 8 AM, 12 noon, 4 PM, 8 PM, and 12 midnight); (2) visual acuity (Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution); (3) estimate of conjunctival hyperemia based on 5 standard photographs (graded as "none," "trace," "mild," "moderate," and "severe"). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: IOP. RESULTS: IOP data (mean and standard deviation) were the following: baseline = 24.7 +/- 0.9 mmHg, after washout = 24.8 +/- 1.1 mmHg, after latanoprost phase = 24.1 +/- 0.9 mmHg, after bimatoprost phase = 18.1 +/- 1.7 mmHg. IOP on bimatoprost proved lower than both baseline (P < 0.0001) and latanoprost (P = 0.0001). Thirteen of 15 patients showed a > or =20% IOP decrease with bimatoprost treatment. None of the 15 patients showed a > or =20% decrease of IOP after 30 days of latanoprost treatment. No significant IOP changes were observed in the fellow untreated eye in each patient throughout the study. Trace-to-mild conjunctival hyperemia was recorded more often with bimatoprost phase (P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Thirteen of 15 patients, who were nonresponders to latanoprost, 0.005%, 2D, were successfully treated with bimatoprost, 0.03%, 2D. Bimatoprost treatment was associated with a higher incidence of trace-to-mild conjunctival hyperemia than latanoprost.     

国产与进口拉坦前列素滴眼液降眼压作用的短期效果比较

目的 比较国产与进口拉坦前列素滴眼液的短期降眼压效果。设计 随机、开放、平行对照的临床研究。 研究对象  原发性开角型青光眼患者和高眼压症患者42例。方法 对上述患者按所用药物的不同依随机表法分为A、B两组。A组28例（28眼）,滴用国产拉坦前列素滴眼液（特力洁）,B组14例（14眼）,滴用进口拉坦前列素滴眼液（适利达）,均为每日1次,每次1滴,共28天。受试者于入组当日及用药后第28天8:00、11:00、14:00、16:00测眼压,第7、14、21天则于8:00测眼压。眼压测量采用Goldmann压平眼压计,测量3次取平均值。裂隙灯显微镜观察角膜、虹膜、晶状体情况。主要指标  眼压值。结果 A组用药前眼压为（23.99±1.51）mm Hg, 用药后1～4周眼压分别为（18.04±1.27）mm Hg、（17.75±1.43）mm Hg、（17.63±1.50）mm Hg、（17.49±1.47）mm Hg,用药后眼压明显下降,与用药前相比差异有统计学意义（F=105.72,P=0.000）。B组用药前眼压为（24.37±1.55）mm Hg,用药后1～4周眼压分别为（17.91±1.35）mm Hg、（17.71±1.39）mm Hg、（17.55±1.34）mm Hg、（17.44±1.17）mm Hg,与用药前相比,用药后眼压明显下降,差异有统计学意义（F=67.85 P=0.000）。A、B两组用药前眼压比较无显著性差异（P=0.43）,用药后1～4周两组眼压比较无显著性差异（P值分别为0.76、0.93、0.86、0.89）。入组当日8:00、11:00、14:00、16:00  A、B两组眼压之间的比较无显著性差异（P值分别为0.46、0.44、0.50、0.31）,用药后28天8:00、11:00、14:00、16:00  A、B两组眼压之间的比较无显著性差异（P值分别为0.89、0.85、0.94、0.98）。用药28天时两组患者角膜、虹膜、晶状体均无异常改变。结论  本文的小样本、短期研究显示,国产拉坦前列素与进口拉坦前列素均能有效降低原发性开角型青光眼及高眼压症患者的眼压,两者之间的降眼压效果无显著差异。（眼科, 2012, 21: 111-114）     

Intraocular pressure-lowering effect of 0.005% latanoprost with two different dosing regimens

Abstract Purpose: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of 0.005% latanoprost used once every other day versus once daily in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). Methods: Forty eyes of 20 patients with bilateral OHT or early POAG were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, crossover study. After a washout period of 1-4 weeks, each patient started latanoprost once daily in 1 randomly assigned eye and once every other day in the other eye. After 1 month, eyes were crossed over to the opposite dosing regimen for another month. IOP was measured at 9 am, 4 pm, and 9 pm, both at baseline and on 2 consecutive days, at the end of the first and second months. The main outcome measure was IOP reduction on the second day at the end of the first and second months. Results: Mean±standard deviation (SD) baseline IOPs (mmHg) in the right and left eye were 25.6±2.6 and 25.5±2.7 (P=0.8), respectively. Mean±SD diurnal IOPs decreased (mmHg) by 8.6±2.5 in the once-daily group versus 7.3±2.3 in the every-other-day group (P<0.001) at the end of the first month and 8.4±2.5 versus 7.7±2.5 at the end of the second month (both on day 2) (P=0.01). Conclusions: Once every-other-day administration of latanoprost significantly reduced the IOP although the IOP reduction was less pronounced 36-48?h after drug application.     

The effects of prostaglandin analogues on the blood aqueous barrier and corneal thickness of phakic patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of topical latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost on the blood-aqueous barrier and central corneal thickness (CCT) of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, masked-observer, crossover clinical trial. METHODS: A total of 34 phakic patients with POAG or OHT with no previous history of intraocular surgery or uveitis completed the study. Patients were randomized to use latanoprost 0.005%, travoprost 0.004%, or bimatoprost 0.03% once daily (2000 hours) for 1 month, followed by a washout period of 4 weeks between each drug. Aqueous flare was measured with a laser flare metre. CCT was calculated as the average of five measurements using ultrasound pachymetry. All measurements were performed by a masked observer (1000 h). RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between baseline mean IOP, mean CCT, and mean flare values among the groups. There was no statistically significant increase in mean flare values from baseline in all groups (P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between mean flare values among the groups (P>0.05). All medications significantly reduced the mean IOP from baseline (P<0.0001). IOP reduction obtained with travoprost (7.3+/-3.8 mmHg) was significantly higher than that obtained with latanoprost (4.7+/-4.2 mmHg) (P=0.01). A statistically significant reduction in mean CCT (0.6+/-1.3%) from baseline was observed when patients instilled bimatoprost (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost had no statistically significant effect on the blood-aqueous barrier of phakic patients with POAG or OHT. Bimatoprost may be associated with a clinically irrelevant reduction in mean CCT.     

Additivity of pilocarpine to bimatoprost in ocular hypertension and early glaucoma

PURPOSE: To determine if the intraocular pressure (IOP) effect of pilocarpine at various concentrations is additive to that of bimatoprost and to assess the tolerability of this combination. METHODS: This was a randomized, prospective trial of patients with IOP > 21 mm Hg following appropriate medication washout. For all visits IOP was measured at 9:00 AM and 11:00 AM. Following baseline visit (#1), bimatoprost 0.03% was instilled qhs OU through visit 6. Following visits 2, 3, and 4 pilocarpine (2%, 4%, 6%) was instilled qid in one randomly selected eye. Pilocarpine was discontinued after visit 5 and bimatoprost after visit 6. Two-tailed, paired t test was used to compare treated and contralateral eyes for their IOP, IOP change, percentage IOP change from baseline, and to compare IOP in the same eye at 9:00 AM and 11:00 AM (before and after pilocarpine administration). IOPs using bimatoprost alone or in combination with various pilocarpine concentrations were compared using single variant Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Seventeen patients were enrolled and 13 patients completed the study. Bimatoprost reduced IOP 28.7% to 30.5% (P < 0.0001) from baseline to visit 2. IOPs in eyes treated with bimatoprost alone or with bimatoprost and various pilocarpine concentrations were similar (P > 0.81, ANOVA). The IOP (P > 0.17) and percentage IOP change from baseline (P > 0.10) was similar in treated and contralateral eyes with all three strengths of pilocarpine. IOP values at 9:00 AM and 11:00 AM, before and after pilocarpine administration, were similar (P > 0.22). CONCLUSION: Bimatoprost alone reduces IOP substantially. Pilocarpine added to bimatoprost at concentrations of 2%, 4%, or 6% was neither additive nor antagonistic to the ocular hypotensive efficacy of bimatoprost.     

Comparison of the effects of latanoprost and bimatoprost on intraocular pressure in chronic angle-closure glaucoma.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of latanoprost and bimatoprost as primary therapy in patients with chronic angle-closure glaucoma (CACG) after peripheral iridotomy. METHODS: Eighty-two (82) consecutive CACG patients with an IOP greater than 19 mmHg after a peripheral iridotomy were recruited. CACG was defined as chronic elevated IOP, glaucomatous optic neuropathy, and a corresponding visual field defect in eyes with occludable angle and peripheral anterior synechiae on gonioscopy. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups based on daily treatment with either latanoprost 0.005% or bimatoprost 0.03% in the evening for 12 weeks. The IOP was measured at 9 AM and 4 PM on the same day at baseline and also at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Between-group differences in mean diurnal IOP and IOP reduction were analyzed. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, mean IOP for both the latanoprost and bimatoprost groups was significantly reduced when compared to the baseline value (21.6 +/- 1.9 to 16.4 +/- 2.5 mmHg and 22.1 +/- 2.0 to 16.9 +/- 2.4 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.001 for both). There was no significant difference in IOP reduction between the two treatment groups (P = 0.40). At 4 and 8 weeks, the IOP changes from baseline were statistically significant at both times for both drugs (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both latanoprost and bimatoprost significantly reduced IOP in CACG patients who were inadequately treated by laser peripheral iridotomy.     

Additive effect of unoprostone and latanoprost in patients with elevated intraocular pressure.

AIMS: To assess the additive effect of unoprostone and latanoprost in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) METHODS: 32 patients with POAG or OHT were randomised to receive either latanoprost once daily or unoprostone twice daily for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks, all patients received both latanoprost and unoprostone for another 4 weeks. The IOP was measured at 9 am and 5 pm on the baseline, day 28, and day 56 visits, and at 9 am on day 14 and day 42 visits. The medications were given to the patients in an open label fashion. The observer was masked to the treatment given. The mean of the measurements was calculated. Safety parameters were also recorded. The additive effect of the medications was assessed by the reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) when both medications were used, compared with when one medication was used. RESULTS: 28 patients completed both treatment periods and had IOP data available for evaluation. After 1 month of treatment, latanoprost significantly reduced IOP (mean by 6.1 (SEM 0.8) mm Hg (p<0.001) and unoprostone by 4.9 (1.0) mm Hg (p<0.001) from the baseline of 24.4 (0.6) mm Hg and 24.4 (1.1) mm Hg respectively (p = 0.18). When latanoprost once daily was given to patients treated with unoprostone, there was additional IOP lowering of 1.9 (0.6) mm Hg (p = 0.012). However, adding unoprostone to those being treated with latanoprost produced an IOP change of +0.4 (0.5) mm Hg (p = 0.42). Ocular symptoms and findings were mild and equally distributed between treatment groups, and after combined therapy. Hyperaemia and ocular irritation were the most frequently reported events. Over a third of patients experienced ocular irritation with the combination of medications. CONCLUSIONS: Latanoprost once daily causes additional IOP lowering in eyes which were being treated with unoprostone twice a day. However, there was no additional IOP lowering when unoprostone was added to eyes which were being treated with latanoprost. Both drugs were well tolerated together with few ocular adverse events.     

A comparison of long-term intraocular pressure fluctuation in patients treated with bimatoprost or latanoprost

PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuation in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension treated with bimatoprost or latanoprost. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data from a previously reported multicenter, investigator-masked, randomized clinical trial of bimatoprost and latanoprost. METHODS: Patients were treated bilaterally with bimatoprost (n = 133) or latanoprost (n = 136) for six months. IOP measurements were taken at 8 am, 12 pm, and 4 pm at baseline, week 1, and months 1, 3, and 6. Long-term IOP fluctuation during treatment was determined as the standard deviation (SD) of all 12 follow-up measurements. RESULTS: There was no significant between-group difference in short-term daily IOP fluctuation at baseline. Long-term IOP fluctuation over six months of treatment [mean SD (range SD)] was 1.9 (0.5 to 6.3) mm Hg with latanoprost vs 1.7 (0.5 to 3.9) mm Hg with bimatoprost (P = .050). Latanoprost-treated eyes were more likely than bimatoprost-treated eyes to have long-term IOP fluctuation of >/=3 mm Hg (7.8% vs 2.5% of eyes; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Bimatoprost-treated eyes demonstrated less long-term fluctuation in IOP compared with latanoprost-treated eyes in this six-month study. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings and to determine their impact on glaucomatous progression.     

A comparison of latanoprost,bimatoprost, and travoprost in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: a 12-week,randomized, masked-evaluator multicenter study

PURPOSE: To Internet Advance publication at ajo.com Feb 13, 2003. compare the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect and safety of latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OH). DESIGN: Interventional study. METHODS: This 12-week, randomized, parallel-group study was conducted at 45 US sites. Previously treated patients with OAG or OH and an IOP > or =23 mm Hg in one or both eyes after washout received either latanoprost 0.005%, bimatoprost 0.03%, or travoprost 0.004% once daily in the evening. At baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks of therapy, masked evaluators measured IOP in triplicate at 8:00 AM, 12 noon, 4:00 PM, and 8:00 PM, and masked investigators graded conjunctival hyperemia before the 8:00 AM IOP measurement. The primary efficacy outcome measure was change between baseline and Week 12 in the 8:00 AM IOP (time of peak drug effect). RESULTS: In all, 410 of 411 randomized patients were included in intent-to-treat analyses (latanoprost, 136; bimatoprost, 136; travoprost, 138). Baseline mean 8:00 AM IOP levels were similar (P =.772); by week 12, reductions were observed in all 3 groups (P <.001 for each). Adjusted (ANCOVA) reductions in mean IOP at 8:00 AM were similar (P =.128) as were those at 12 noon, 4:00 PM, and 8:00 PM. Fewer latanoprost-treated patients reported ocular adverse events (P <.001, latanoprost vs bimatoprost), fewer reported hyperemia (P =.001, latanoprost vs bimatoprost), and average hyperemia scores were lower at week 12 (P =.001, latanoprost vs bimatoprost). CONCLUSIONS: Latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost were comparable in their ability to reduce IOP in OAG and OH patients. Latanoprost exhibited greater ocular tolerability.     

Comparison of intraocular pressure lowering effect of once daily morning vs evening dosing of latanoprost/timolol maleate combination

PURPOSE: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction profiles of latanoprost-timolol maleate fixed combination (LTFC) administered in the morning or evening in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: A prospective, randomized study including 60 eyes of 30 patients with POAG was carried out. Patients were randomized to treatment with LTFC at 8 PM (Group 1) or at 8 AM (Group 2). After therapy of 4 weeks, IOP was measured at 2 AM, 6 AM,10 AM, 2 PM, 6 PM, and 10 PM and compared with baseline values and latanoprost therapy alone. RESULTS: Mean diurnal baseline IOPs and IOPs after treatment with latanoprost and LTFC were 23.6+/-2.6, 16.7+/-2.3, and 15.5+/-2.2 mmHg in Group 1 and 23.1+/-2.6, 16.9+/-2.4, and 15.7+/-2.4 mmHg in Group 2. LTFC lowered IOP more than latanoprost at all time points in both groups (p<0.001) (except 6 AM in Group 2). The mean IOP range after LTFC therapy was lower than the baseline in Group 1 whereas it was not different in Group 2. IOP at 10 AM was significantly higher than the other time points at baseline measurements in both groups (p<0.01) but after treatment there was no difference (p>0.05). According to IOP reduction from baseline, there was a statistically significant difference between groups in favor of Group 1 at 6 AM, 10 AM, and mean diurnal measurement (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Both morning and evening dosing of LTFC were effective in lowering diurnal IOP in patients with POAG. However, evening dosing of LTFC seemed to be more effective in controlling IOP especially in the morning and avoiding the fluctuations with lower range of IOP.     

Relation between axial length of the eye and hypotensive effect of latanoprost in primary open angle glaucoma

AIMS: To study the effect of axial length on the hypotensive effect of latanoprost in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) in a prospective, observational study. METHODS: The authors measured axial length and baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) of 109 eyes with POAG, and then repeated the IOP measurements at 1, 3, and 6 months after starting treatment with latanoprost. RESULTS: The mean IOP level was significantly lower in eyes with a shorter axial length compared with the eyes with a longer axial length both at 3 and 6 months of treatment (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively, ANOVA). CONCLUSION: The hypotensive effect resulting from treatment with latanoprost could be related to ocular axial length.     

Water-drinking test in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma while treated with different topical medications.

OBJECTIVE: Reduction and diurnal stabilization of the intra-ocular pressure (IOP) is the mainstay of treatment for glaucoma. Fluctuations of IOP in glaucomatous patients can also be induced by the osmotic variations caused by water ingestion. Such influence can be studied by means of the water-drinking test (WDT). The aim of this study was to perform the WDT in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) while they were being treated with different IOP-lowering medications, to test the effect of drugs with different mechanisms of action on the ability to maintain a stable IOP. METHODS: A total of 280 POAG patients were enrolled, 40 patients per group for each of the tested medications (timolol, dorzolamide, brinzolamide, travoprost,latanoprost, bimatoprost, and brimonidine). After baseline IOP measurement, all patients underwent WDT (1000 mL of water in 10 min). The IOP was measured at 15-min intervals until the return of IOP to baseline values. The main outcomes measured were mean IOP peak, mean IOP percentage increase, and mean time for returning to baseline IOP value. RESULTS: The highest mean IOP peak was found with timolol, whereas no difference was found among the other drugs. The highest mean IOP percentage increase was found with timolol, whereas bimatoprost showed an IOP percentage increase significantly lower than latanoprost, dorzolamide, and brinzolamide. The duration of IOP increase was shortest for bimatoprost and longest for timolol. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that topical medications that enhance outflow (e.g., bimatoprost, latanoprost, travoprost, and brimonidine) may provide, under stressful conditions such as the WDT, better IOP stabilization than medications that decrease aqueous humor inflow, such as timolol and topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors.     

A six-month randomized clinical trial comparing the intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy of bimatoprost and latanoprost in patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma

PURPOSE: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of topical bimatoprost 0.03% with latanoprost 0.005%. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked clinical trial. METHODS: After washout of glaucoma medications, ocular hypertension or glaucoma patients were randomly assigned to once-daily bimatoprost 0.03% (n = 133) or latanoprost 0.005% (n = 136) for 6 months. The primary outcome measure was mean change from baseline IOP (8 AM, 12 PM, 4 PM). Secondary measures included mean IOP, ophthalmologic examination, adverse events, and the percentage of patients reaching specific target IOPs. RESULTS: Mean change from baseline IOP was significantly greater for bimatoprost patients than for latanoprost patients at all measurements on each study visit; 1.5 mm Hg greater at 8 AM (P <.001), 2.2 mm Hg greater at 12 PM (P <.001), and 1.2 mm Hg greater at 4 PM (P =.004) at month 6. At the end of the study, the percentage of patients achieving a > or = 20% IOP decrease was 69% to 82% with bimatoprost and 50% to 62% with latanoprost (P < or = .003). In addition, the distribution of patients achieving target pressures in each range (< or = 13 to < or = 15 mm Hg, >15 to < or = 18 mm Hg, and > 18 mm Hg) showed that bimatoprost produced lower target pressures compared with latanoprost at all times measured (P < or = .026). Few patients were discontinued for adverse events (6 on bimatoprost; 5 on latanoprost). On ophthalmologic examination, conjunctival hyperemia (P <.001) and eyelash growth (P =.064) were more common in bimatoprost patients. CONCLUSIONS: Bimatoprost is more effective than latanoprost in lowering IOP. Both drugs were well tolerated, with few discontinuations for adverse events.     

Cystoid macular edema in a low-risk patient after switching from latanoprost to bimatoprost

PURPOSE: To report a case of angiographically documented cystoid macula edema occurring after switching a pseudophakic patient from latanoprost to bimatoprost. DESIGN: Observational case report. METHODS: A 68-year-old man developed intense conjunctival hyperemia and cystoid macula edema after switching from latanoprost to bimatoprost 9 months after cataract surgery in an eye at low-risk for this cystoid macular edema. RESULTS: Bimatoprost was discontinued and diclofenac initiated. After 2 months, visual acuity and ocular hyperemia returned to baseline levels. Fundus examination revealed resolution of cystoid macula edema. CONCLUSION: It is possible that pseudophakic eyes that develop intense conjunctival hyperemia associated with ocular hypotensive lipids might be at higher risk for developing cystoid macula edema.     

Effect of bimatoprost on intraocular pressure in prostaglandin FP receptor knockout mice

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of bimatoprost on intraocular pressure in the prostaglandin FP receptor knockout mouse. METHODS: The IOP response to a single 1.2-microg (4 microL) dose of bimatoprost was measured in the treated and untreated fellow eyes of homozygote (FP+/+, n = 9) and heterozygote (FP+/-, n = 10) FP-knockout mice, as well as in wild-type C57BL/6 mice (FP+/+, n = 20). Serial IOP measurements were also performed after topical bimatoprost in a separate generation of homozygous FP-knockout mice and wild-type littermate control animals (n = 4 per group). Aqueous humor protein concentrations were measured to establish the state of the blood-aqueous barrier. Tissue, aqueous humor and vitreous concentrations of bimatoprost, latanoprost, and their C-1 free acids were determined by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: A significant reduction in IOP was observed in the bimatoprost-treated eye of wild-type mice at 2 hours, with a mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference in means of -1.33 mm Hg (-0.81 to -1.84). Bimatoprost did not lead to a significant reduction in IOP in either the heterozygous knockout -0.36 mm Hg (-0.82 to +0.09) or homozygous FP-knockout mice 0.25 mm Hg (-0.38 to +0.89). The lack of an IOP response in the FP-knockout mice was not a consequence of blood-aqueous barrier breakdown, as there was no significant difference in aqueous humor protein concentration between treated and fellow eyes. Tissue and aqueous humor concentrations of bimatoprost, latanoprost, and their C-1 free acids indicate that latanoprost, but not bimatoprost, is hydrolyzed in the mouse eye after topical administration. CONCLUSIONS: An intact FP receptor gene is critical to the IOP response to bimatoprost in the mouse eye.     

Effect of concomitant use of latanoprost and brinzolamide on 24-hour variation of IOP in normal-tension glaucoma

PURPOSE: To study the effect of the concomitant use of latanoprost and brinzolamide on the 24-hour variation in the intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG). METHODS: We studied a total of 44 eyes from 22 NTG patients. Mean 24-hour IOP variation was determined after a washout period of > or =4 weeks. Latanoprost monotherapy was continued in both eyes for 8 weeks. Thereafter, patients were randomized to continue latanoprost monotherapy in 1 eye whereas brinzolamide was added as an adjunct to latanoprost therapy in the other eye. Eight weeks after the initiation of brinzolamide treatment, the 24-hour IOP variation was remeasured. IOP was measured in the sitting position 8 times daily using a Goldmann applanation tonometer before and after treatment. RESULTS: The eyes treated with latanoprost monotherapy and those treated with latanoprost and brinzolamide showed a significant decrease in IOP at all time points. Percent reductions in the diurnal mean IOP (mean IOP at 10 AM, 1 PM, and 4 PM) and in nocturnal mean IOP (mean IOP at 10 PM, 1 AM, and 3 AM) were significantly greater in the eyes treated with the combination of latanoprost and brinzolamide than those with latanoprost alone (diurnal mean IOP: latanoprost and brinzolamide=19.8%, latanoprost=14.1%, P<0.001; nocturnal mean IOP: latanoprost and brinzolamide=13.4%, latanoprost=10.0%, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of NTG, the combination of latanoprost and brinzolamide demonstrated additive effects in lowering IOP, not only during the day, but also at night.     

Comparative evaluation of bimatoprost monotherapy in primary chronic angle closure and primary open angle glaucoma eyes: a three-year study.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the long-term efficacy of bimatoprost 0.03% monotherapy in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) versus primary chronic angle closure glaucoma (PCACG) eyes. METHODS: A total of 55 consecutive primary adult glaucoma patients on bimatoprost monotherapy were prospectively evaluated in this 3-year, open-labeled, uncontrolled study. The primary outcome was the evaluation of a difference in the response to therapy of POAG eyes, as compared to PCACG eyes over a follow-up of 3 years. RESULTS: In the POAG group, the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) at the 36-month followup was found to be increased by 2.10 (+/-3.90) mmHg (confidence interval [CI], 0.975-4.185), compared to the mean IOP at 1 month (P = 0.047). In the PCACG group, the mean IOP at the 36-month follow-up was increased by 3.66) (+/- 3.34) mmHg (CI, 6.241-1.092), compared to the mean IOP at 1 month (P = 0.011). This upward drift in IOP was higher in the PCACG group, compared to the POAG group, but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.54). Patients with POAG and PCACG showed a 50% and 40% chance of having an IOP of <18 mmHg with bimatoprost monotherapy (P = 0.23), respectively, at the 3-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that bimatoprost 0.03% monotherapy significantly lowers IOP in both POAG and PCACG eyes over a period of 3 years, though its efficacy appeared to decrease over time, to a similar extent, in both groups.     

Comparison of the ocular hypotensive effects of bimatoprost and timolol-dorzolamide combination in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: a 6-month study

PURPOSE: To compare the ocular hypotensive efficacy and safety of topical bimatoprost and timolol-dorzolamide combination in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension during 6 months of treatment. METHODS: A sample of 65 patients with a diagnosis of POAG or ocular hypertension were randomized to receive either bimatoprost 0.03% once daily or timolol-dorzolamide combination twice daily. Study visits occurred at baseline and after 2 weeks and 1, 3 and 6 months of therapy. Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements were performed at 12.00 hours at all study visits and also at 08.00 hours and 16.00 hours at baseline and 6-month visits. At each visit, local and systemic side-effects that occurred during the treatment period were recorded. Student's t-test was used to compare the differences between IOP values. RESULTS: Differences in IOP between the bimatoprost and timolol-dorzolamide groups were statistically insignificant at all study visits (p > 0.05). In the bimatoprost-treated group, the IOP reduction was 6.2 +/- 1.8 mmHg, whereas it was 6.5 +/- 2.3 mmHg in the timolol-dorzolamide group after 6 months of treatment. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: The IOP-lowering efficacies of bimatoprost and timolol-dorzolamide combination were similar over a 6-month follow-up. Both bimatoprost and the timolol-dorzolamide combination were well tolerated. Bimatoprost can be used as a longterm monotherapy agent in the treatment of POAG and ocular hypertension.     

Effect of latanoprost on intraocular pressure in steroid-induced glaucoma

PURPOSE: To study the effect of monotherapy with latanoprost 0.005% on intraocular pressure (IOP) in a prospective nonrandomized clinical trial of patients newly diagnosed with steroid-induced secondary open-angle glaucoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight patients (16 eyes) with newly diagnosed steroid-associated secondary open-angle glaucoma were prescribed latanoprost 0.005% once a day in each eye. The initial IOP before treatment served as an internal control for each eye. Intraocular pressure was remeasured after 1 month of monotherapy with latanoprost. Investigators (WJS) were blinded to initial IOP at the time of remeasurement. After discontinuation of steroids, IOP was rechecked. If IOP was stable, latanoprost was discontinued. Intraocular pressure was rechecked 2 to 4 weeks later to confirm an association with steroid use. RESULTS: Intraocular pressure was significantly decreased after treatment with latanoprost (18.3 +/- 2.8 mm Hg) compared with initial IOP (25.3 +/- 9.1 mm Hg). This change represented a 28% decrease in IOP compared with baseline levels. Average IOP after discontinuation of steroids and latanoprost (17.3 +/- 1.4 mm Hg) did not differ from IOP measured during treatment with latanoprost, but it was significantly less than the initial IOP before treatment. No adverse effects were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Monotherapy with latanoprost is safe and effective in patients with steroid-induced glaucoma. Advantages include lack of systemic side effects and convenient once-daily dosing.     

Peak pressures: crossover study of timolol and latanoprost

PURPOSE: To compare the diurnal efficacy and action on peak intraocular pressures (IOP) of 0.005% latanoprost and 0.5% timolol as primary therapy in 60 eyes having dark brown irides with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: A prospective, comparative, observer-masked, crossover, interventional trial including the mean of both eyes of 30 patients with POAG who were randomly started on either latanoprost once daily or timolol twice daily. Three months after treatment with one drug, the second drug was substituted. A masked observer carried out diurnal assessments of IOP before the start of therapy and at 3 and 7 months. The fourth month was the washout period for the first drug. RESULTS: The average baseline IOP was 23.36 +/- 2.14 mm Hg, which was reduced by 8.8 +/- 2.2 mmHg with latanoprost (p < 0.01) and by 6.75 +/- 1.9 mm Hg with timolol (p = 0.01). The reduction was greater for latanoprost (p < 0.005). The average peak IOP at baseline was 27.6 +/- 2.22 mmHg. The effective fall in IOP at the time of new peaks in subsequent diurnal recordings of IOP compared to the baseline diurnal curve was 8.9 mm Hg with latanoprost (p < 0.005) and 5.77 mm Hg with timolol (p < 0.01). This difference in IOP reduction between the two drugs was statistically significant (p < 0.01). Latanoprost had a lower efficacy in peak IOP reduction in eyes with evening peak of IOP than in those with morning peak (p < 0.005). The efficacy of timolol was lower overall compared to latanoprost, but was similar in all circadian rhythms. The shift in timing of IOP peak was greater with latanoprost compared to timolol (4.34 hours vs -0.72 hours, p < .01). A total of 90% of patients on latanoprost and 33.3% on timolol achieved a reduction of > 30% in baseline mean IOP. The average of the trough IOP recorded in each of the individual baseline IOP curves was 19.05 +/- 2.05 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: Greater mean and peak IOP reduction was achieved with latanoprost compared to timolol. Dampening of the circadian rhythm was better with latanoprost. Latanoprost appears to be more effective than timolol at all points in time with greater efficacy in eyes with morning peaks compared to evening peaks.