Clinical Utility of FDG-PET in Detecting Head and Neck Tumors. A Comparison of Diagnostic Methods and Modalities

Positron emission tomography (PET) using F-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose(F-18-FDG) is gaining acceptance as a useful imaging method for head and neck tumors. Results of 59 PET scans done on 45 patients with head and neck tumors were evaluated retrospectively. Thirty-six patients had prior treatment consisting of surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or a combination of these modalities. PET results were compared to computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging results and validated by histologic findings or survival. PET identified 36 out of 37 tumors (sensitivity 97%) and 18 of 22 benign processes (specificity 82%). Tumor was ruled out in 18 out of 19 patients. For CT, the sensitivity was 80% (20/25) and specificity was 31% (4/13). FDG-PET facilitates differentiation of recurrent head and neck tumors from treatment related changes sometimes difficult to characterize by CT or MRI and may have a significant impact on the management of patients reducing morbidity and costs.     

FDG-PET delayed imaging for the detection of head and neck cancer recurrence after radio-chemotherapy: comparison with MRI/CT

In advanced head and neck cancer, an organ-sparing approach comprising radiation therapy combined with intra-arterial chemotherapy has become an important technique. However, the high incidence of residual masses after therapy remains a problem. In this study, we prospectively evaluated the use of 2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) delayed imaging for the detection of recurrence of head and neck cancer after radio-chemotherapy, and compared the FDG-PET results with those of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT). Forty-three lesions from 36 patients with head and neck cancer suspected to represent recurrence after radio-chemotherapy (median interval from therapy, 4 months) were studied. PET was performed at 2 h after FDG injection, and evaluated. The results were compared to those of contrast studies with MRI or CT performed within 2 weeks of the PET study, and to histological diagnosis (in all patients suspected of having recurrence) or clinical diagnosis. The lesion-based sensitivity (visual interpretation) and negative predictive value of FDG-PET (88% and 91%, respectively) were higher than those of MRI/CT (75% and 67% respectively). The specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value of FDG-PET (78%, 81% and 70%, respectively) were significantly (P<0.05) higher than those of MRI/CT (30%, 47% and 39% respectively). Three of six patients with false positive findings had post-therapy inflammation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that retrospective evaluation with the standardised uptake ratio yielded the best results (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 81.5%), followed by visual interpretation and then the tumour/neck muscle ratio. An FDG-PET delayed imaging protocol yielded significantly better results for the detection of recurrence of head and neck cancer after radio-chemotherapy than MRI/CT. Because of the high negative predictive value of FDG-PET (91.3%), if PET is negative, further invasive procedures may be unnecessary.     

Evaluation of whole-body cancer screening using <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-<Emphasis Type="SmallCaps">d</Emphasis>-glucose positron emission tomography: a preliminary report

OBJECTIVE: (18)F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is a promising screening modality targeting whole body. However, the validity of PET cancer screening remains to be assessed. Even the screening accuracy for whole-body screening using FDG-PET has not been evaluated. In this study, we investigated the screening accuracy of PET cancer screening. METHODS: A total of 2911 asymptomatic participants (1629 men and 1282 women, mean age 59.79 years) underwent both FDG-PET and other thorough examinations for multiple organs (gastrofiberscopy, total colonofiberscopy or barium enema, low-dose thin section computed tomography and sputum cytology, abdominal ultrasonography, an assay of prostate-specific antigen, mammography, mammary ultrasonography, Pap smear for the uterine cervix, and magnetic resonance imaging for the endometrium and ovaries) between February 2004 and January 2005, and followed sufficiently. The detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of FDG-PET were calculated using cancer data obtained from all examinations along with a 1 year follow-up. RESULTS: From among 2911 participants FDG-PET found 28 cancers, 129 cancers were PET negative. PET-positive cancers comprised seven colorectal cancers, four lung cancers, four thyroid cancers, three breast cancers, two gastric cancers, two prostate cancers, two small intestinal sarcomas (gastrointestinal stromal tumors), one malignant lymphoma, one head and neck malignancy (nasopharyngeal carcinoid tumor), one thymoma, and one hepatocellular carcinoma. PET-negative cancers included 22 gastric cancers and 20 prostate cancers that were essentially difficult to detect using FDG-PET. The overall detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were estimated to be 0.96%, 17.83%, 95.15%, and 11.20%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET can detect a variety of cancers at an early stage as part of a whole-body screening modality. The detection rate of PET cancer screening was higher than that of other screening modalities, which had already shown evidence of efficacy. However, the sensitivity of PET cancer screening was lower than that of other thorough examinations performed at our institute. FDG-PET has some limitations, and cancer screening using only FDG-PET is likely to miss some cancers.     

Early diagnosis of recurrent breast cancer with FDG-PET in patients with progressive elevation of serum tumor markers.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this work is to assess the diagnostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), in the early detection of tumour recurrence in already treated breast cancer patients in apparent complete remission and with a progressive elevation of tumour markers CEA and/or CA 15.3 without any other clinical or instrumental signs of relapses. METHODS: The author studied 45 women (mean age 58+/-12, range 35-80 years) with histological diagnosis of breast cancer who underwent a tumour marker-guided whole body FDG-PET. All patients were in remission, without any other clinical or instrumental signs of relapses, except for the progressive elevation of CA 15.3 and/or CEA, tested during the follow-up. FDG-PET results were controlled by pathology when histological sampling was possible, by other conventional imaging modalities (US, X-rays, CT, MRI) and/or by clinical follow-up up to 12 months at least. RESULTS: FDG-PET findings were evaluated in 38 patients: 27 resulted positive. Among these 27 PET positive patients 24 were true positive and 3 false positive. Tumour marker guided FDG-PET was also able to discover 3 unknown neoplasms not visualized by other modalities. PET revealed 54 sites of intense focal FDG uptake. The anatomical distribution of these sites was 19 skeleton, 18 lymph node basins, 5 liver, 5 pelvic region, 1 lung, 1 pericardium, 1 pleura, 1 contralateral breast, 2 peritoneum and 1 thyroid bed. Forty-eight of these 54 sites of FDG accumulation were confirmed to be metastases. FDG-PET resulted negative in 11 patients and only in 2 of them the other diagnostic modalities were able to discover metastatic lesions; we had 9 true negative and 2 false positive RESULTS. On the basis of our investigation the performances of tumour marker guided FDG-PET per patient are as follows: sensitivity 92% (24/26), specificity 75% (9/12), positive predictive value 89% (24/27), negative predictive value 82% (9/11), accuracy 87% (33/38). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the clinical utility of tumour marker-guided PET in the follow-up of breast cancer patients. This diagnostic approach allowed to modify the clinical management in those patients in whom a tumor relapse or unexpected primary neoplasm was discovered.     

Positron emission imaging of head and neck cancer, including thyroid carcinoma

Most positron emission tomography (PET) imaging studies in head and neck cancer are performed using the radiotracer 18-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)FDG). PET with FDG has become a standard clinical imaging modality in patients with head and neck cancer. It contributes valuable information in localizing a primary tumor in patients with neck nodal metastases from an unknown primary, in the staging of primary head and neck cancer, and in the detection of recurrent disease. In addition, FDG-PET provides independent prognostic information in patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent head and neck cancer. PET/CT improves lesion localization and accuracy of FDG-PET and is strongly recommended in patients with head and neck cancer. After thyroidectomy, FDG-PET has proven useful in patients with clinical or serological evidence of recurrent or metastatic thyroid carcinoma but negative whole body iodine scan. PET shows metastatic disease in up to 90% of these patients, thereby providing a rational basis for further studies and therapy. In patients with medullary thyroid cancer with elevated calcitonin levels following thyroidectomy, FDG-PET has a sensitivity of 70-75% for localizing metastatic disease. Occasionally incidental intense FDG uptake is observed in the thyroid gland on whole body PET studies performed for other indications. Although diffuse FDG uptake usually indicates thyroiditis, focal uptake has been related to thyroid cancer in 25-50% of cases and should therefore be evaluated further if a proven malignancy would cause a change in patient management.     

Performance of FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis of recurrent uterine cervical cancer

The purpose is to evaluate the accuracy of integrated FDG-PET/CT, compared with PET alone, for diagnosis of suspected recurrence of uterine cervical cancer. Fifty-two women who had undergone treatment for histopathologically proven cervical cancer received PET/CT with suspected recurrence. PET-alone and integrated PET/CT images were evaluated by two different experienced radiologists by consensus for each investigation. A final diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology, radiological imaging, and clinical follow-up for over 1 year. Patient-based analysis showed that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET/CT were 92.0% (23/25), 92.6% (25/27), and 92.3% (48/52), respectively, while for PET, the corresponding figures were 80.0% (20/25), 77.8% (21/27), and 78.8% (41/52), respectively. PET/CT resolved the false-positive PET results due to hypermetabolic activity of benign/inflammatory lesions and physiological variants, and was able to detect lung metastasis, local recurrence, peritoneal dissemination, para-aortic lymph node metastasis, and pelvic lymph node metastasis missed by PET alone. However, tiny local recurrence and lymph node metastasis could not be detected even by PET/CT. FDG-PET/CT is a useful complementary modality for providing good anatomic and functional localization of sites of recurrence during follow-up of patients with cervical cancer.     

Accuracy of FDG-PET in Gastric Cancer. Preliminary Experience

OBJECTIVE: Currently available imaging modalities, including CT, ultrasound, and MRI are unsatisfactory in the detection of metastatic gastric cancer, especially lymph node metastases and peritoneal spread. The aim of this study is to evaluate FDG-PET in the diagnosis of primary as well as metastatic gastric cancer.METHOD: All patients (18M/5F; mean age 62, range 33-81) with gastric cancer referred for FDG-PET scan from 1/1/97 to 3/20/98 were studied. PET images of the neck, chest, and abdomen were acquired using a dedicated whole body scanner. A final diagnosis was reached in 21 patients by histology, surgical findings, or clinical follow-up.RESULTS: All but 1 primary tumor (12 out of 13) and both cases with local recurrence showed a high degree of FDG uptake, with mean SUV of 8.9 (range 4.8-17.6). The one false negative (FN) occurred in a poorly controlled diabetic with blood sugar of >400 at the time of study. Six cases with prior gastrectomy were true negative (TN) in the region of the stomach. This translates to a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 95% for the primary site. In contrast, for intra-abdominal lymph node (LN) stations PET was true positive (TP) in 2, FN in 7, false positive (FP) in 1, and TN in 32, yielding a sensitivity of 22% and accuracy of 81%. PET detected only 2 out of 9 perigastric lymph node metastases. For the 8 patients in this series who had documented M1 disease, PET detected two with liver metastasis, one with colon metastasis, and one with submandibular LN. However, four cases of peritoneal spread were missed.CONCLUSION: FDG-PET is highly sensitive in detecting the primary lesion in gastric cancer and shows promise in the detection of liver and extra-abdominal metastasis. However, PET appears limited in the detection of perigastric lymphadenopathy as distinct from the primary tumor and in assessing peritoneal spread. Our preliminary assessment suggests that staging of gastric cancer with FDG-PET scanning is relatively effective at detecting distant metastatic disease and will complement standard staging methods such as laparoscopy, which are more effective at staging local nodal spread and peritoneal disease.     

Ovarian cancer recurrence: role of whole-body positron emission tomography using 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-<Emphasis Type="SmallCaps">D</Emphasis>-glucose

This study was designed to assess the value of whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) using 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy- D-glucose (FDG) for the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer. Twenty-five patients who had previously undergone surgery for ovarian cancer were imaged using whole-body FDG-PET. During the 4 weeks preceding the PET study, conventional imaging, comprising computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the abdomen and/or pelvis, was performed and serum CA125 levels were measured. PET imaging was commenced at 60 min after the intravenous administration of FDG in all patients. PET results were compared with the results of conventional imaging and CA125 levels, and related to pathological findings and clinical follow-up for more than 6 months. FDG-PET showed a sensitivity of 80% (16/20), a specificity of 100% (5/5) and an accuracy of 84% accuracy (21/25) for the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of conventional imaging were 55% (11/20), 100% (5/5) and 64% (16/25), respectively. PET could detect recurrent lesions in seven of nine patients in whom conventional imaging was falsely normal, while conventional imaging was true positive in two of four patients with false-negative PET results. The CA125 results showed a sensitivity of 75% (15/20), a specificity of 100% (5/5) and an accuracy of 80% accuracy (20/25). Among the 15 patients with true-positive CA125 results, PET correctly detected abnormal foci of recurrence in 13 patients (86.7%) whereas conventional imaging showed recurrent lesions in only eight patients (53.3%). In conclusion, our preliminary study demonstrates that FDG-PET may be accurate and useful for the detection of tumour recurrence when conventional imaging is inconclusive or negative, especially in patients with abnormal CA125 levels.     

Dual-modality FDG-PET/CT in follow-up of patients with recurrent iodine-negative differentiated thyroid cancer

The usefulness of combined 2-[¹⁸F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in locating suspected recurrence in patients with iodine-negative differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) was evaluated. Thirty-six patients with DTC and suspected iodine-negative recurrence underwent restaging with FDG-PET/CT. The images of CT, FDG-PET, both modalities viewed side by side (CT+PET), and FDG-PET/CT were evaluated by two physicians separately. Imaging results were correlated with either histology (n = 20) and/or clinical follow-up of at least 36 months. Recurrent disease was diagnosed in 22/36 patients. FDG-PET alone, CT alone, CT+PET, and FDG-PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 82%, 73%, 91%, and 96%, respectively. Specificities were 79%, 71%, 79%, and 100%, respectively. FDG-PET/CT significantly improved specificity compared with CT+PET and resulted in a further treatment modification in 5/36 patients (14%). CT alone was especially sensitive for lung metastases, FDG-PET alone for the remainder of the body. Accurate fusion of functional and morphologic data by FDG-PET/CT improves the staging accuracy of patients with suspected recurrence of iodine-negative DTC. This has an impact on patient management in a substantial number of patients.     

The impact of FDG-PET on the management algorithm for recurrent colorectal cancer.

Positron emission tomography (PET) has been successfully used to image colorectal cancer (CRC). This study evaluated the accuracy of 2-[(18)F]-fluoro-2-deoxy- D-glucose (FDG) PET for the detection and staging of recurrent CRC and the consequent impact on clinical management. Forty-two patients previously treated for CRC were investigated for suspected recurrence and, if recurrence was confirmed, the extent of disease was evaluated. All patients underwent whole-body FDG-PET and computed tomography (CT) scan and results were compared to assess sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy for each modality. We then assessed the FDG-PET directed alteration in clinical management from that planned on the basis of spiral CT results. FDG-PET was more sensitive (93%) than CT (73%) for detection of recurrence (specificity 58% and 75%, respectively). FDG-PET yielded a correct diagnosis in 35 (83%) out of 42 patients, while CT did so in 31 patients (74%). FDG-PET was more accurate than CT for staging local recurrence (sensitivity 100%, specificity 86% with FDG-PET vs 75% and 100%, respectively, with CT) and CRC liver metastases (sensitivity 100% vs 45%; specificity 100% for both). Overall, PET upstaged 8 out of 30 patients (27%) and altered patient management in 16 (38%) cases. This study confirms that FDG-PET is more sensitive than CT for the detection and staging of recurrent CRC. The results also indicate that FDG-PET is an accurate means of selecting appropriate patients for operative treatment. When applied to routine clinical practice, patient management is altered.     

Usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT in Assessment of Recurrence of Cervical Cancer After Treatment

Objective

Until now, serum tumor markers, physical examination, and conventional imaging modalities, such as CT or MRI, have been used in assessment of recurrence of cervical cancer after treatment. However, CT and MRI provide only anatomical data, which makes analysis of post-treatment change difficult. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of PET/CT, a new scanning device that combines PET and CT, in evaluation of cervical cancer lesions in patients with suspected recurrence.

Methods

We studied 51 patients suspected of recurrence among those who underwent F-18 FDG PET/CT for cervical cancer follow-up at Gachon University Gil Hospital between June 2006 and August 2009. Patients were considered to be at risk for recurrence if they reported symptoms that were clinically suggestive of recurrence, or if physical examination showed abnormalities, serum tumor marker levels rose, or follow-up images revealed changes, such as new lesions or swelling of previous sites. Sensitivity, accuracy, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of PET/CT were measured.

Results

A total of 37 patients were confirmed with recurrence or metastasis, 13 of whom were diagnosed histologically. Measured across all patients, PET/CT scored 97.3% on sensitivity, 71.4% on specificity, a positive predictive value of 90%, a negative predictive value of 90.9%, and an accuracy of 90.2%. PET/CT yielded only one false negative diagnosis and four false positives.

Conclusion

As F-18 FDG PET/CT has high sensitivity and negative predictive value in diagnosis of recurrent cervical cancers, it is expected that it will be useful for clinical determination of recurrence and prevention of unnecessary additional treatments. The hope is that a future study on a larger scale will contribute further to determination of the efficacy of PET/CT.     

Evaluation of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with FDG positron emission tomography

PURPOSE: This study compared the effectiveness of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) with computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or both for the assessment of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The value of quantifying the standardized uptake values (SUV) to distinguish recurrent neoplasm from inflammatory lesions and normal structures was also evaluated. METHODS: Forty-three patients with head and neck cancer were examined with F-18 FDG PET at least 4 months after their last course of radiation therapy (mean, 11 months). The SUVs were measured in visually identified regions of abnormally increased activity and were compared with the values in normal mucosa, the base of the tongue, and the hard palate to determine if an optimal cutoff value exists for diagnosing recurrence of malignant lesions. The final diagnosis of recurrence was made based on biopsy or at least 6 months' clinical follow-up. RESULTS: FDG PET correctly detected recurrence in 20 of 22 patients who had 45 discrete lesions located in the field of the upper aerodigestive tract. Two false-negative and three false-positive results were identified. The accuracy of FDG PET was 88% (38 of 43 patients), compared with 66% (25 of 38 patients) for CT, MRI, or both. Although there was a significant difference of SUVs (P = 0.0036) between the recurrent lesions and normal structures, the optimal cutoff values were difficult to define. CONCLUSIONS: Visual analysis of FDG PET is significantly more accurate in the diagnosis of recurrent squamous cell cancer of the head and neck than are CT or MRI. However, single SUV quantification does not significantly enhance efficacy.     

FDG-PET improves the staging and selection of patients with recurrent colorectal cancer

Whole-body fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has proved effective in the diagnosis and staging of recurrent colorectal cancer. In this study, we analysed how PET affects the management of patients with recurrent colorectal cancer by permitting more accurate selection of candidates for curative resection. The data of 79 patients with known or suspected recurrent colorectal cancer were analysed. Conventional imaging modalities (CIM) and PET results were compared with regard to their accuracy in determining the extent and the resectability of tumour recurrence. Recurrence was demonstrated in 68 of the 79 patients. The data indicate that PET was superior to CIM for detection of recurrence at all sites except the liver. Based on the CIM+PET staging, surgery with curative intent was proposed in 39 patients and was indeed achieved in 31 of them (80%). PET was more accurate than CIM alone in predicting the resectability or non-resectability of the recurrence (82% vs 68%, P=0.02). It is concluded that whole-body FDG-PET is highly sensitive for both the diagnosis and the staging of patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. Its use in conjunction with conventional imaging procedures results in a more accurate selection of patients for surgical treatment with curative intent.     

Update on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging of squamous head and neck cancers

This article summarizes the recent literature in (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging of head and neck cancers and extends the previous review in this area by Sch?der and Yeung in the July 2004 issue of Seminars in Nuclear Medicine. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET-CT) imaging is now used widely but has not been adequately evaluated for head and neck cancer. Its accuracy in initial staging is better than CT but may be similar to magnetic resonance imaging. It is not sufficiently accurate in the N0 neck to rule out nodal metastases but may be appropriate if sentinel node mapping is performed in patients with PET studies showing no nodal disease. PET imaging is beginning to be used in radiotherapy treatment planning, where it makes a significant difference by identifying malignant normal size nodes, extent of viable tumor, and distant disease. PET continues to be useful in carcinoma of unknown primary in identification of the primary site. Overall success is around 27% after all other modalities have failed. FDG-PET is being used frequently to assess response to therapy and for surveillance thereafter. The major controversy is when to image after radiotherapy or combined chemo-radiotherapy. One month seems to be too early. The ideal time seems to be 3 to 4 months to avoid both false-positive and false-negative studies. The growing use of PET-CT studies in head and neck cancer will certainly make a significant difference in the treatment and outcome in this disease.     

Whole-body MR imaging vs. FDG-PET: comparison of accuracy of M-stage diagnosis for lung cancer patients

PURPOSE: To conduct a prospective comparison of the accuracy of whole-body MR imaging and positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 deoxyglucose (FDG) (FDG-PET) to assess the M-stage in lung cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 90 consecutive lung cancer patients (mean age = 68 years) underwent whole-body MR imaging and FDG-PET as well as other standard radiological imaging procedures before and after treatment. Probabilities of metastases on whole-body MR imaging and FDG-PET were assessed by using 5-point scoring systems on a per-site basis and on a per-patient basis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to compare diagnostic capabilities. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were also compared by using the McNemar's test on a per-site and per-patient basis. RESULTS: For assessment of head and neck metastases and bone metastases, accuracies of whole-body MR imaging (95.0% and 94.8%, respectively) were significantly higher than those of FDG-PET (89.1% and 88.2%, respectively; P < 0.05). For assessment of the M-stage on a per-patient basis, accuracy of whole-body MR imaging (80.0%) was also significantly higher than that of FDG-PET (73.3%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Whole-body MR imaging is an accurate diagnostic technique and may be considered at least as effective as FDG-PET for assessment of the M-stage of lung cancer patients.     

F-18 FDG PET/CT in the management of thyroid cancer

PURPOSE: There are approximately 32,000 new cases of thyroid carcinoma annually in the United States. F-18 FDG PET/CT has an established role in cancer management, including thyroid cancer, usually in patients who are thyroglobulin (Tg) positive/iodine negative. We reviewed our experience with F-18 FDG PET/CT in thyroid cancer, with an emphasis on correlation with Tg, and maximum standardized uptake values (SUV). We also analyzed the role of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) on PET/CT results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study (January 2003 to December 2006) of 76 patients with differentiated thyroid cancer, who had F-18 FDG PET/CT scans. There were 44 women and 32 men, with age range of 20 to 81 years (average, 51.1 +/- 18.1). The administered doses of F-18 FDG ranged from 396 to 717 MBq (15.8-19.4 mCi) (average, 566 +/- 74.8) (15.3 +/- 2). Reinterpretation of the imaging studies for accuracy and data analysis from medical records were performed. RESULTS: A total of 98 PET/CT scans were analyzed (59 patients had 1 scan, 12 patients had 2, and 5 patients had 3). PET/CT was 88.6% sensitive (95% CI: 78.-94.3) and 89.3% specific (95% CI: 71.9-97.1). Mean Tg level was 1203 ng/mL (range, 0.5-28,357) in patients with positive PET/CT and 9.72 ng/mL (range, 0.5-123.0) in patients with negative PET/CT scans (P = 0.0389). Mean SUV max was 10.8 (range, 2.5-32) in the thyroid bed recurrence/residual disease and 7.53 (range, 2.5-26.2) in metastatic lesions (P = 0.0114). Mean SUV max in recurrent/residual disease in patients with TSH 30 mIU/L was 8.1 (range, 2.6-32) (P = 0.2994). CONCLUSION: F-18 FDG PET/CT had excellent sensitivity (88.6%) and specificity (89.3%) in this patient population. Metastatic lesions were reliably identified, but were less F-18 FDG avid than recurrence/residual disease in the thyroid bed. TSH levels at the time of PET/CT did not appear to impact the FDG uptake in the lesions or the ability to detect disease. In the setting of high or rising levels of Tg, our study confirms that it is indicated to include PET/CT in the management of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.     

Bone metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: The diagnostic role of F-18 FDG PET/CT

Purpose

To evaluate the performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT in the detection of bone metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Materials and methods

Three hundred and sixty-two consecutive NSCLC patients who underwent F-18 FDG PET/CT scanning were retrospectively analyzed. Each image of PET/CT, combined CT, and PET was performed at 10 separate areas and interpreted blindly and separately. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT, combined CT and F-18 FDG PET were calculated and the results were statistically analyzed.

Results

Bone metastasis was confirmed in 82 patients with 331 positive segments based on the image findings and clinical follow-up. On patient-based analysis, the sensitivity of F-18 FDG PET/CT (93.9%) was significantly higher than those of combined CT (74.4%) and F-18 FDG PET (84.1%), respectively (p < 0.05). The overall specificity and accuracy of combined CT, F-18 FDG PET, and F-18 FDG PET/CT were 90.7%, 93.2%, 98.9% and 87.0%, 91.2%, and 97.8%, respectively (compared with PET/CT, p < 0.05). On segment-based analysis, the sensitivity of the three modalities were 79.5%, 94.3%, and 98.8%, respectively (compared with PET/CT, p < 0.05). The overall specificity and accuracy of the three modalities were 87.9%, 89.2%, 98.6% and 84.5%, 91.2%, 98.7%, respectively (compared with PET/CT, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

F-18 FDG PET/CT is superior to F-18 FDG PET or combined CT in detecting bone metastasis of NSCLC patients because of the complementation of CT and PET. It is worth noting that the added value of F-18 FDG PET/CT may beneficially impact the clinical management of NSCLC.     

Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent uterine cancer: comparison with PET and enhanced CT

Purpose  To evaluate the accuracy of integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) with iodinated contrast agent and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in the diagnosis of suspected uterine cancer recurrence and to assess the impact of PET/CT findings on clinical management, compared with PET alone and enhanced CT alone. Methods  Of 103 women who had undergone treatment for histopathologically proven uterine cervical or endometrial cancer, 90 underwent FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT examination for suspected recurrence. PET-alone, CT-alone, and fused PET/CT images were interpreted by two radiologists by consensus for each investigation. Lesion status was determined on the basis of histopathology, radiological imaging and clinical follow-up for longer than 6 months. Differences among the three modalities were tested using the Cochran Q test, followed by multiple comparisons using the McNemar test with Bonferroni adjustment. Results  Patient-based analysis showed that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET alone were 79.5% (35/44), 73.9% (34/46), and 76.7% (69/90), respectively, whereas those of CT alone were 68.2% (30/44), 87.0% (40/46), and 77.8% (70/90), respectively, and those of PET/CT were 90.9% (40/44), 93.5% (43/46), and 92.2% (83/90), respectively. PET/CT findings resulted in a change of management in 38 of the 90 patients (42%) with an additional effect on patient management in 13 patients (14%) diagnosed by CT alone and 14 patients (16%) diagnosed by PET alone. Conclusion  FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT is a more accurate modality for assessing recurrence of uterine cancer, and led to more appropriate subsequent clinical management than that resulting from PET alone or enhanced CT alone.     

TNM staging with FDG-PET/CT in patients with primary head and neck cancer

Purpose PET/CT, PET+CT, and CT were compared concerning accuracies in TNM staging and malignancy detection in head and neck cancer. The impact of PET/CT compared to the other imaging modalities on therapy management was assessed. Materials and methods Fifty-five patients with suspected head and neck primary cancer underwent whole-body FDG-PET/CT. PET/CT and PET+CT were evaluated by a nuclear medicine physician and a radiologist; CT was evaluated by two radiologists, PET by two nuclear physicians. Histopathology served as the standard of reference. Differences between the staging modalities were tested for statistical significance by McNemar’s test. Results Overall TNM-staging and T-staging with PET/CT were more accurate than PET+CT and CT alone (p < 0.05). PET/CT was marginally more accurate than CT alone in N-staging (p = 0.04); no statistically significant difference was found when compared to PET+CT for N-staging. PET/CT altered further treatment in 13 patients compared to CT only and in 7 patients compared to PET+CT. Conclusion Combined PET/CT proved to be partly more accurate in assessing the overall TNM-stage than CT and PET+CT. These results were based on a higher accuracy concerning the T-stage, mainly in patients with metallic implants and marginally the N-stage. Therapy decisions have been influenced in a substantial number of patients. PET/CT might be considered as a first line diagnostic tool in patients with suspected primary head and neck cancer.     

The role of FDG-PET/CT in the detection of recurrent colorectal cancer

Purpose The conventional diagnostic techniques used to assess recurrence of colorectal cancer (CRCR) often yield unspecific findings. Integrated FDG-PET/CT seems to offer promise for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions. The aim of this study was to compare the value of FDG-PET and PET/CT in the detection of CRCR subsequent to colonic resection or rectal amputation. Methods The population for this retrospective study comprised 84 patients with suspected CRCR. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of PET and PET/CT were calculated for (a) intra-abdominal extrahepatic recurrences, (b) extra-abdominal and/or hepatic recurrences and (c) all recurrences, and tumour marker levels were analysed. Results The sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of PET in detecting intra-abdominal extrahepatic CRCR were 82%, 88% and 86%, respectively, compared with 88%, 94% and 92%, respectively, for PET/CT. The corresponding figures for detection of extra-abdominal and/or hepatic CRCR were 74%, 88% and 85% for PET and 95%, 100% and 99% for PET/CT. Considering the entire population, the sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of PET were 80%, 69% and 75%, respectively, compared with 89%, 92% and 90%, respectively, for PET/CT. FDG-PET/CT examination correctly detected 40 out of a total of 45 patients with CRCR. Two of five patients with falsely negative FDG-PET/CT findings had local microscopic recurrences and one had miliary liver metastases. Of 39 patients without CRCR, three showed false positive FDG-PET/CT results. Two of these cases were due to increased accumulation in inflammatory foci in the bowel wall, while one was due to haemorrhaging into the adrenal gland. Conclusion FDG-PET/CT appears to be a very promising method for distinguishing a viable tumour from fibrous changes, thereby avoiding unnecessary laparotomy.