Residual neuromuscular block is a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications A prospective, randomised, and blinded study of postoperative pulmonary complications after atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium

Background: After anaesthesia involving pancuronium a high incidence of both residual neuromuscular block and postoperative pulmonary complications (POPC) has been reported. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of POPC following the use of pancuronium, atracurium, and vecuronium, and to examine the effect of residual neuromuscular block on the incidence of POPC.
Methods: A total of 691 adult patients undergoing abdominal, gynaecological, or orthopaedic surgery under general anaesthesia were randomised to receive either pancuronium, atracurium, or vecuronium. Perioperatively, the response to train-of-four (TOF) nerve stimulation was evaluated manually. Post-operatively, the TOF ratios were measured mechanomyograph-ically, and through a 6-day follow-up the patients were examined for pulmonary complications.
Results: The incidence of residual block, defined as a TOF ratio <0.7, was significantly higher in the pancuronium group (59/226: 26%) than in the atracurium/vecuronium groups (24/450: 5.3%). In the pancuronium group, significantly more patients with residual block developed POPC (10/59: 16.9%) as compared to patients without residual block (8/167 4.8%). In the atracurium/vecuronium groups, the incidence of POPC was not significantly different in patients with (1/24: 4.2%) or without (23/426: 5.4%) residual block. Multiple regression analysis indicated that abdominal surgery, age, long-lasting surgery, and a TOF ratio<0.7 following the use of pancuronium were potential risk factors for the development of POPC.
Conclusion: Postoperative residual block caused by pancuronium is a significant risk factor for development of POPC.     

A prospective study of risk factors and cardiopulmonary complications associated with anaesthesia and surgery: risk indicators of cardiopulmonary morbidity

The aims of this study were: 1) to describe the frequency and type of cardiopulmonary complications, 2) to identify factors significantly associated with cardiovascular and pulmonary complications associated with anaesthesia and surgery, and 3) to estimate the total risk of cardiopulmonary complications for an anaesthetic when a combination of risk factors is present. Seven thousand three hundred and six anaesthetized patients undergoing gastrointestinal, urological, gynaecological, and orthopaedic surgery were included in the study; 6.3% (1:16) had one or more cardiovascular complications requiring intervention associated with anaesthesia and surgery, and 4.8% (1:21) had pulmonary complications. The total incidence of patients with one or more complications associated with anaesthesia and surgery was 9.4% (1:11). Based on logistic regression analyses, our data indicate that the following patient categories constitute high risk patients with regard to cardiovascular complications: patients aged greater than or equal to 70 years, patients with a history of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) with previous myocardial infarction less than 1 year, a history of chronic heart failure (CHF), and in patients admitted to major surgery. The extent of pulmonary complications following anaesthesia and surgery was significantly correlated to patients aged greater than or equal to 70 years, preoperative chronic obstructive lung disease (COLD), major surgery, and to general anaesthesia involving muscle relaxants. Attempts to estimate the cardiopulmonary complications which may accompany anaesthesia and surgery provided important information about the anaesthetic course and outcome. With our model it seems possible to distinguish between very different levels of cardiopulmonary risk in the anaesthetic patient.     

Postoperative complaints after spinal and thiopentone-isoflurane anaesthesia in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery Spinal versus general anaesthesia

Background. The present prospective study investigates the impact of a standardized technique of spinal and general anaesthesia on the incidence and consequences of postanaesthetic complaints dependent on age and sex of patients.
Methods. 433 orthopaedic patients underwent lower limb surgery in spinal (group 1) or general (group 2) anaesthesia. Spinal anaesthesia was performed with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine using a 26-gauge Quincke needle. General anaesthesia was induced with i.v. injection of thiopentone, fentanyl and atracurium and maintained with 65% nitrous oxide and 1-1.5 Vol% isoflurane in oxygen. On postoperative day 4, patients were interviewed for onset and duration of postoperative complaints.
Results. The overall incidence of nausea/vomiting ( P =0.025) and sore throat ( P =0.001) was higher in group 2. In addition, nausea/vomiting was higher in patients between 20 and 60 years in group 2 compared with group 1. While the incidence of urinary dysfunction was higher in men after spinal ( P =0.04), nausea/vomiting was more frequent in women after general anaesthesia ( P =0.008). Analgetic requirements ( P =0.013), time of postoperative surveillance ( P =0.042) and frequency of treatment of postoperative complaints ( P =0.0001) was higher in group 2.
Conclusion. Spinal anaesthesia was associated with a lower incidence of postoperative complaints and treatments and a shorter surveillance compared to general anaesthesia. Specific complications related to spinal anaesthesia did not depend on age or sex and may allow for recommendation of this technique even in younger and female patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery.     

A randomized trial of caudal block with bupivacaine 4 mg x kg-1 (1.8 ml x kg-1) plus morphine (150 microg x kg-1) vs general anaesthesia with fentanyl for cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND: Regional anaesthesia has been used effectively in paediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery and is thought to be safe. METHODS: Thirty patients ASA physical status II-III undergoing scheduled palliative or corrective cardiac surgery, receiving premedication with midazolam and anaesthetic induction with sevoflurane, fentanyl and pancuronium were randomly allocated to two groups. In group 1, patients received bupivacaine 0.22% 4 mg.kg-1 (1.8 ml.kg-1) and morphine 150 microg x kg-1 by the caudal route. After a 20-min period for the block to take effect, sevoflurane 0.5-1.0% and fentanyl 5 microg x kg-1 were administered for maintenance of anaesthesia. In group 2, the anaesthetic technique was the same as in group 1, without a caudal block and fentanyl 25 microg x kg-1 was administered at the moment of surgical incision. RESULTS: Cardiovascular and haemodynamic responses of patients receiving caudal block showed minor variations during the 20-min period between caudal and general anaesthesia. Fentanyl requirements during surgery were lower (P = 0.001) in patients with caudal block than patients with general anaesthesia. Extubation time was shorter (P = 0.034) in the caudal group. Two patients in the general anaesthesia group and one in the caudal group died because of postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Caudal block with bupivacaine 0.22% 4 mg.kg-1 (1.8 ml.kg-1) and morphine 150 microg x kg-1 was safe and effective for paediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, patients might have a better outcome with a reduction of morphine dosage and administration of a muscle relaxant of shorter duration of action than pancuronium.     

Postoperative pulmonary complications in older patients undergoing elective surgery with a supraglottic airway device or tracheal intubation

The two most commonly used airway management techniques during general anaesthesia are supraglottic airway devices and tracheal tubes. In older patients undergoing elective non-cardiothoracic surgery under general anaesthesia with positive pressure ventilation, we hypothesised that a composite measure of in-hospital postoperative pulmonary complications would be less frequent when a supraglottic airway device was used compared with a tracheal tube. We studied patients aged ≥ 70 years in 17 clinical centres. Patients were allocated randomly to airway management with a supraglottic airway device or a tracheal tube. Between August 2016 and April 2020, 2900 patients were studied, of whom 2751 were included in the primary analysis (1387 with supraglottic airway device and 1364 with a tracheal tube). Pre-operatively, 2431 (88.4%) patients were estimated to have a postoperative pulmonary complication risk index of 1–2. Postoperative pulmonary complications, mostly coughing, occurred in 270 of 1387 patients (19.5%) allocated to a supraglottic airway device and 342 of 1364 patients (25.1%) assigned to a tracheal tube (absolute difference −5.6% (95%CI −8.7 to −2.5), risk ratio 0.78 (95%CI 0.67–0.89); p < 0.001). Among otherwise healthy older patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia with intra-operative positive pressure ventilation of their lungs, there were fewer postoperative pulmonary complications when the airway was managed with a supraglottic airway device compared with a tracheal tube.     

Anaesthesia for fractured neck of femur

Fracture of the femoral neck is a common injury in the elderly, and many patients have significant co-morbidities. Effective management requires a multidisciplinary approach involving anaesthetists, medical physicians and orthopaedic surgeons. Although early surgery within 24–48 hours is beneficial, there may be medical conditions that need prior optimization. Both general anaesthesia and regional neuroaxial anaesthesia can be used, although it appears regional anaesthesia is preferred by most anaesthetists as it is associated with reduced early postoperative mortality, less deep vein thrombosis, less fatal pulmonary embolism, and fewer pulmonary complications.     

Regional anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia, morbidity and mortality

The regional versus general anaesthesia debate is an age-old debate that has brought about few clear answers. Most concur that multiple factors including the patient, the surgery, the method of regional and general anaesthesia, and the quality of perioperative care, all influence surgical outcome. In this age of evidence-based medicine, the heterogenous data available need to be reconciled with the advances in perioperative care and the significant decline in complications associated with the surgical process as a whole. This review considers general issues such as the type of available evidence, and its limitations, particularly with regard to the relatively broad question of neuraxial versus general anaesthesia. It then assesses current evidence on regional versus general anaesthesia for specific scenarios such as hip fracture surgery, carotid endarterectomy, Caesarean section, ambulatory orthopaedic surgery, and postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients after non-cardiac surgery.     

Regional anaesthesia in the outpatient treatment of bilateral inguinal hernias using totally extraperitoneal laparoscopy

The treatment of bilateral inguinal hernias using totally extraperitoneal laparoscopy is usually done with general anaesthesia. The objective of this article is to evaluate the regional anaesthesia technique in extraperitoneal laparoscopic surgery for treating bilateral inguinal hernias in an outpatient surgery unit. Prospective clinical study of 30 patients with uncomplicated bilateral inguinal hernia undergoing surgery using extraperitoneal laparoscopy. The anaesthesic technique used were spinal regional anaesthesia. We analysed clinical data (age, sex, associated diseases, prior abdominal surgery, site and hernia type), intra-operative complications (bleeding, peritoneal rupture, subcutaneous emphysema, reconversion rate, haemodynamic stability, respiratory problems and degree of satisfaction), postoperative complications (haematomas, urinary retention, post lumbar puncture headaches, nausea, vomiting and postoperative pain) and recurrence rate. All the patients undergoing surgery under-spinal anaesthesia in any case was necessary to reconvert it to general anaesthesia. In conclusion, regional anaesthesia is safe and efficient in an outpatient surgery unit in the treatment of bilateral inguinal hernias.     

ANAESTHESIA FOR THE MORBIDLY OBESE: Experience with 110 patients

The anaesthetic management and postoperative complications of110 grossly obese patients undergoing weight-reducing surgeryhave been reviewed. The major problems were technical, relatedto the bulk of the patient, and respiratory, caused by alterationsin pulmonary physiology. Extradural catheters were placed in70 patients before induction of general anaesthesia. In allpatients the trachea was intubated during anaesthesia and thelungs ventilated with large tidal volumes and appropriate inspiredoxygen concentrations. Muscle relaxation was achieved with extraduralblock in 35 patients; the remainder received pancuronium i.v.Extradural analgesia with bupivacaine provided excellent analgesiaafter surgery and greatly facilitated nursing care.     

How to inform a morbidly obese patient on the specific risk to develop postoperative pulmonary complications using evidence-based methodology

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients have the right to be informed about the expected benefits and risks of medical and surgical procedures. Ideally this information should be scientifically based and presented to the patient in time. In morbidly obese patient undergoing general anaesthesia, postoperative pulmonary complications are an important cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality. A 46-yr-old female with a body mass index of 89.8 kg m(-2) was scheduled to undergo radical abdominal surgery for cervix carcinoma. In order to inform her accurately on the risk of developing postoperative pulmonary complications, we undertook to answer the following question: What is the risk to develop postoperative pulmonary complications in a morbidly obese patient about to undergo abdominal surgery under general anaesthesia? METHODS: A Medline search was conducted from 1966 to 2004 with respect to postoperative pulmonary complications in abdominal surgery of morbidly obese patients. Altogether, 213 articles were found, of which seven were selected. Additionally, seven cross-references and or related articles were used. RESULTS: For obese patients who undergo abdominal surgery under general anaesthesia, the likelihood to develop atelectasis is 10.4 +/- 4.8% (P < 0.001) with a correlation coefficient of 0.28-0.34 (P < 0.05). The likelihood to develop atelectasis and pneumonia taken together is 29.3% with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.82 (95% confidence interval 1.66-4.78; P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Considering the positive correlation coefficient and the high body mass index of this patient she has a risk of at least 29.3% to develop pneumonia and/or atelectasis, which should affect the anaesthetic strategy in this patient.     

General vs regional anaesthesia in outpatient treatment for inguinal hernias using extraperitoneal laparoscopy

Summary The treatment of inguinal hernias using laparoscopy can be performed without violating the peritoneal cavity using the totally extraperitoneal technique (TEP). This procedure is usually done with general anaesthesia. The objective of this article is to evaluate the general and regional anaesthesia techniques in extraperitoneal laparoscopic surgery for treating inguinal hernias in an outpatient surgery unit. A prospective clinical study of 131 patients with uncomplicated inguinal hernia undergoing surgery using extraperitoneal laparoscopy was completed. Two study groups were established according to the anaesthesia technique used: general (n = 90) and regional (n = 41). We analyzed clinical data (age, sex, associated diseases, prior abdominal surgery, site and hernia type), intra-operative complications (bleeding, peritoneal rupture, subcutaneous emphysema, reconversion rate, haemodynamic stability, respiratory problems and degree of satisfaction), postoperative complications (haematomas, urinary retention, post lumbar puncture headaches, nausea, vomiting and postoperative pain) and recurrence rate. General anaesthesia was used significantly more in the cases of prior infra-umbilical surgery and bilateral hernias (p < 0.05). Statistically significant differences were not shown for intra- or post-operative complications. The rate of conversion was higher for general (5.5%) than for regional anaesthesia (2.4%). Recurrence was detected only in the regional anaesthesia group. In conclusion, general anaesthesia is not required for the performance of extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair; regional anaesthesia is a safe and efficient alternative.     

Perioperative risk factors in elective pneumonectomy: the impact of excess fluid balance

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to identify risk factors for complications and in-hospital mortality associated with pneumonectomy. METHODS: The influence of fluid balance during anaesthesia was evaluated, taking into account the patient's age, gender and body mass index, smoking habits, history of pulmonary or cardiac disorders, the site of pneumonectomy and duration of anaesthesia. One-hundred-and-seven patients undergoing elective pneumonectomy were included in the study. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients (29%) suffered from one or more postoperative complications, seven (22.4%) of these had severe dysrhythmias, six (19.6%) had pulmonary complications and three (9.3%) had cardiovascular complications. The overall mortality rate was 10.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on logistic regression analysis, our data indicate the following risk factors for postoperative complications: positive fluid balance exceeding 4000 mL during anaesthesia (pulmonary complications and mortality), body mass index < 17 or > 25 kg m(-2) (severe dysrhythmias), or history of chronic heart disease (pulmonary complications). Thirteen patients (12.4%) suffered from a fluid balance > 4000 mL during anaesthesia. Regression analysis indicated that fluid balance exceeding 4000 mL was associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications than blood loss exceeding 1000 mL and to be the strongest risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications and in-hospital mortality. Further trials estimating the effect of restrictive fluid regimens and the use of vasopressors for blood pressure control during anaesthesia must be carried out.     

Factors independently associated with increased risk of pain development after ophthalmic surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Little has been documented about the development of pain after ophthalmic surgery. This study was designed to assess the incidence and severity of postoperative pain following ophthalmic surgery, and to identify key factors independently associated with development of such pain. METHODS: In a prospective, observational cohort study, 500 patients undergoing elective ophthalmic surgery were examined by assessing numerical analogue scales and analgesic requirements. RESULTS: Depending on anatomical location of surgery, operations could be classified into creating 'more severe' or 'less severe pain'. Patients undergoing posterior segment, corneal and muscle surgery exhibited the highest numerical analogue scale scores (risk ratio 4.5, 95% CI 3.01-6.79, P < 0.0001). Anterior segment surgery, which per se did not create much pain, resulted in significantly more pain when performed under general anaesthesia compared to regional anaesthesia (risk ratio 6.52, 95% CI 2.33-18.2, P < 0.0001). No other factors independently associated with an increased risk of developing serious postoperative pain could be identified. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing certain ophthalmic operations, especially if performed under general anaesthesia, are more likely to experience serious postoperative pain.     

A prospective survey of postoperative nausea and vomiting with special regard to incidence and relations to patient characteristics, anesthetic routines and surgical procedures

We performed a prospective study on 421 patients subjected to routine general-, orthopaedic-, urologic-, gynecological and paediatric surgery to estimate the current incidences of nausea and vomiting during the first 24 hours after surgery.
The overall incidences of postoperative nausea or vomiting were 17% and 28%, respectively. Postoperative emetic symptoms were not related to age in adults. Women had more often emetic symptoms than men ( P <0.01). In general, opiate premedication was more frequently associated with postoperative nausea and vomiting than benzodiazepines ( P <0.01), but in otherwise comparable subgroups of patients undergoing major surgery, this difference was not confirmed. Balanced general anaesthesia caused more nausea (23%) and vomiting (53%) than face-mask anaesthesia (13% and 15%, respectively) or regional blocks (12% and 7%, respectively) ( P <0.001). There was a positive correlation between the duration of anaesthesia and the incidence of postoperative emetic symptoms ( P <0.001). The incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting after abdominal surgery were 23% and 58% respectively. Corresponding figures for orthopaedic surgery were 25% and 34%, other kinds of extra-abdominal surgery 18% and 32% and for laparoscopy 21% and 25%. After minor gynecological-, urological-and paediatric surgery the incidences were less than 20%.
In conclusion female gender, balanced anaesthesia, lengthy duration of anaesthesia, and abdominal and orthopaedic operations appeared to be most frequently associated with postoperative emetic symptoms.     

Postoperative symptoms 24 hours after ambulatory anaesthesia

Purpose

To test the hypothesis that the type of surgical procedure influences the incidence of postoperative symptoms. Also the effect of demographic and clinical risk variables: age, sex, ASA status, duration of anaesthesia on the postoperative symptoms were evaluated for each type of surgery.

Methods

Demographic, medical, anaesthetic and surgical data on 1,017 patients were prospectively collected by a research assistant who telephoned each patient 24 hr after discharge to administer a questionnaire to determine postoperative symptoms. Postoperative symptoms included incisional pain, nausea/vomiting, drowsiness, dizziness, headache and fever. In addition, 270 patients were asked the % (0–100) of their return to daily living function at 24 hr.

Results

Incisionat pain (26.9%), headache (11.6%), and drowsiness (11.5%) were the most frequently reported symptoms. Dizziness was reported by 9.7% and nausea/vomiting by 7.1%. Approximately 50% of patients undergoing laparoscopy, orthopaedic and general surgery reported 24-hr postoperative incisionat pain. The incidence of 24-hr postoperative nausea/vomiting was highest after general 17.4%, orthopaedic, 11.2%, and laparoscopic surgery, 9.4%. Drowsiness was highest after laparoscopy 36.1%, followed by general surgery, 21.4%. Dizziness was most frequent after laparoscopy, 24.1%, followed by general surgery, 16.1%. After laparoscopy, postoperative drowsiness or dizziness was related to anaesthesia duration. After general surgery, postoperative dizziness or drowsiness were related to age; the younger the patient, the more likely the symptoms.

Conclusions

Postoperative pain, nausea/vomiting, drowsiness, dizziness, and headache were the more frequent postoperative symptoms 24 hr after ambulatory surgery and they were influenced by the type of surgical procedure. In addition, the type of surgery and the 24-hr postoperative symptoms determined the degree of return to daily living function.     

Epidural vs general anaesthesia

BACKGROUND: Aim of this study is to determine if and how the anaesthesia technique can significantly influence the outcome in patients after major orthopaedic surgery in terms of: patrimony of red blood cells (blood loss and erythropoiesis), incidence of intra and postoperative complications, postoperative pain control and hospital stay. METHODS: 210 patients, ASA physical status I-III, undergoing elective primary total hip replacement were randomly allocated in three groups of 70 patients to receive either epidural anaesthesia (Group EA), general anaesthesia (GA), or epidural anaesthesia integrated with mild general anaesthesia (IA). RESULTS: Data show a significant difference between the amount of pain measured by VRS immediately after surgery: prevalently absent in groups IA (84.3%) and EA (85.7%) and prevalently severe and moderate in group AG (34.3%). The measurement of the basic circulating erythrocyte mass in the first, third and fifth postoperative day, calculated by the Mercuriali formula, which considers blood loss, autologous and homologous transfusions and erythropoiesis, showed that general anaesthesia leads to a significant delay in the resumption of haemopoiesis. This result was attenuated by its combination with epidural anaesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the literature and the results of our study, epidural anaesthesia seems to be the most appropriate technique for patients scheduled for total hip replacement: due to its simpler analgesic cover, its tendency to be associated with a lower incidence of complications in the first 24 hours after surgery. The incidence of relevant hypotension is minor compared to integrated anaesthesia. General anaesthesia produced a significant decrease in postoperative erythropoiesis.     

A prospective study of mortality associated with anaesthesia and surgery: risk indicators of mortality in hospital

The aims of this study were to: 1) determine the incidences and causes of mortality associated with anaesthesia and surgery, 2) identify important factors associated with mortality in hospital, and 3) estimate the mortality risk associated with anaesthesia and surgery when a combination of risk factors are present. A total of 7306 anaesthetized patients undergoing abdominal, urological, gynaecological, or orthopaedic surgery were included in the study. Of these, 0.05% (1:1800) died during anaesthesia, 0.1% (1:730) during the recovery period, and the overall mortality rate in hospital was 1.2% (1:81). Most deaths occurred in the elderly (greater than or equal to 70 years of age) and were unavoidable due to progression of the presenting condition, such as advanced cancer, or co-existing diseases such as cardiopulmonary or renal failure. Of the patients who developed myocardial infarction (MI) following anaesthesia, 67% (8/12) died in the postoperative period. Half of the MI patients who died received regional anaesthesia, and in addition suffered from periods of cardiovascular dysfunction intraoperatively. By utilizing logistic regression analysis, a model for prediction of mortality risk was developed. The model included five significant preoperative predictive variables: age; patients with history of chronic heart disease, and renal disease; emergency surgery; and the type of operation. With this model it is possible to distinguish between patients with very different mortality risks.     

Anaesthesia for major orthopaedic surgery in the elderly

This article addresses three specific issues related to major hip and knee surgery in the elderly. Firstly, the importance of thorough pre-operative evaluation is discussed. Secondly, the pros and cons in the immediate peri-operative period of major regional (spinal or epidural) anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia are reviewed with respect to blood loss, cardiovascular and respiratory function and immunological and metabolic responses to surgery. Finally, the evidence for an anaesthetic technique effect on outcome parameters, especially thromboembolism, cognitive function and mortality, is presented. Regional anaesthesia is the method of choice for most patients undergoing elective hip surgery since it results in reduced blood loss and transfusion needs, modification of the neuro-endocrine stress response, improved early postoperative oxygenation, and a reduced incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) postoperatively. In the surgery of fractures of the neck of femur, outcome with regional anaesthesia is at least comparable to that with general anaesthesia, but with improved early postoperative oxygenation and a smoother emergence from anaesthesia making initial nursing management easier. Comparative data in other forms of orthopaedic surgery in the elderly are few, but also support the use of regional techniques.     

Alterations in respiratory mechanics following thoracotomy

Major alteration in respiratory mechanics occur in all patients following anaesthesia and thoracotomy because of a decrease in the functional residual capacity with minimal change in the closing volume leading to airway closure during tidal breathing and atelectasis. Diminished pulmonary reserve, because of non-pulmonary and pulmonary risk factors before operation, and/or restrictive ventilation and abnormal pattern of breathing due to postoperative pain sustain and aggravate these changes. These can proceed to postoperative pulmonary complications in some normal, and in many high risk, patients. Detection and correction of pre-existing pulmonary disease, smoking, sepsis and obesity is essential to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality. Effective postoperative regional analgesia minimizes impairment of pulmonary function, aids in its recovery, and prevents postoperative pulmonary complications. The adjuvant use of chest physiotherapy and incentive spirometry should also help in decreasing the adverse affects of anaesthesia and surgery on the chest and thereby reduce the frequency and severity of postoperative complications.     

Effects of anaesthesia and surgery on serum opsonic capacity

Several factors of immune response are affected by anaesthesia and surgery. Opsonization as a phase of the phagocytic process was studied in ten patients undergoing cholecystectomy under balanced anaesthesia with thiopentone, suxamethonium, pancuronium, N2O + O2, fentanyl, dehydrobenzperidol and enflurane. The luminol-dependent chemiluminescence responses were depressed at the end of surgery in phagocytosis of patient-serum-opsonized zymosan and Bordetella pertussis (P less than 0.05). The responses to Bordetella pertussis were already depressed after the period of presurgery anaesthesia (P less than 0.05). The responses returned to preinduction values by the third postoperative day. Since the decreases could only be observed with diluted serum and there were no infectious complications in the patients, the serum opsonic capacity was considered clinically sufficient during and after anaesthesia and surgery.