Long-term freedom from aneurysm-related mortality remains favorable after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a 15-year multicenter registry

ObjectiveEndovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become the preferred approach to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) because of lower early morbidity and mortality than open repair. However, the ability of EVAR to prevent long-term aneurysm-related mortality (ARM) has been questioned in light of recent trial data. We have updated our long-term EVAR experience in a large multicenter registry to further examine this issue.MethodsBetween 2000 and 2010, 1736 patients with AAA underwent EVAR in a large integrated regional healthcare system. We extended follow-up in this previously reported cohort through 2015 and identified predictors associated with ARM and need for major reintervention. The primary outcome was ARM. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, delayed aneurysm rupture, major adverse event, major reintervention, sac growth of more than 5 mm, and type I or III endoleak. End points were analyzed for the whole cohort and compared for patients who underwent EVAR during the earlier (2000-2005) and latter (2006-2010) halves of the enrollment period to assess for changes in outcomes over time of repair.ResultsThe overall follow-up rate was 96.3%, and median follow-up was 5.5 years (interquartile range, 2.8-7.7 years). During the study period, 958 patients died, of whom 63 experienced ARM (6.6%). Overall crude rate of freedom from ARM was 96.4%. Delayed aneurysm rupture was seen in 1.3% (n = 23), with a median time to event of 4.1 years (interquartile range, 1.7-7.2 years). Major adverse events occurred in 12.4% of patients, and major reintervention was performed in 10.3%. Overall freedom from major adverse event or major reintervention was seen in 84.0%. Significant predictors of ARM included female sex, age 80 to 89 years, urgent EVAR, and any major reintervention. The unadjusted cumulative probability of all-cause survival was significantly higher in the late group than the early group at 5 years (66.8% vs 59.8%; P = .01, log-rank test); however, freedom from ARM at 5 years was not significantly different (96.5% and 97.1%, respectively; P = .67, log-rank test).ConclusionsOur results demonstrate favorable long-term freedom from major adverse event or major reintervention after EVAR and extremely low rates of ARM and delayed rupture. Our findings support EVAR as a safe, long-term solution for managing patients with AAA and provide insight into clinical parameters that can be used to stratify patients' post-EVAR surveillance and need for reintervention.     

The use of statins and fate of small abdominal aortic aneurysms

The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of statins in reducing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) growth rate and improving freedom from aneurysm repair or rupture. One hundred and twenty-one patients with AAA undergoing ultrasonographic surveillance for at least one year were included in this retrospective study. Patients treated with statins had a decreased linear aneurysm growth rate than those not receiving statins (1.9+/-1.8 mm/year vs. 2.6+/-2.4 mm/year, P=0.27), but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Statin users had a better survival freedom from aneurysm repair or rupture (at 5 years: 72.3% vs. 52.5%, P=0.048). The impact of treatment with statins was even more evident in patients with a baseline aneurysm diameter<40 mm (at 5 years: 84.0% vs. 58.8%, P=0.022). When adjusted for age, coronary artery disease and baseline aneurysm diameter, treatment with statins had significantly better survival freedom from aneurysm repair or rupture (P=0.012, RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14-0.78). The use of statins seems to slightly decrease the AAA growth rate and to significantly improve freedom from aneurysm repair and rupture.     

Long-term surveillance is paramount after implantation of the Vanguard stent-graft for abdominal aortic aneurysms

AIM: The aim of this study was to describe the results and long-term follow-up of the Vanguard endovascular graft for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: Between February 1997 and October 1999, 76 patients were treated with a median aneurysm diameter of 52 mm (39-90 mm). All were followed up according to the Eurostar criteria. RESULTS: The primary technical success rate was 100%. Perioperative mortality was 1.3%. During follow-up (median 75 months, 6-112 months) 9 aneurysm related deaths occurred. A total of 79 late complications occurred in 45 patients (64%). Complications were noticed more frequently in the group of aneurysms larger than 5.5 cm (P=0.014). Patients who ultimately developed aneurysm rupture after endovascular repair had more postoperative complications compared to the majority who did not rupture their aneurysm. (P=0.001) Secondary interventions were mandatory in 23 patients, surgical conversion in 9. At 72 months this has resulted in an overall survival rate of 57%, an aneurysm rupture free survival of 88%, a conversion free survival of 95%, an endoleak free survival of 83% and a secondary intervention free survival of 82% (Kaplan Maier). CONCLUSION: The importance of life-long strict surveillance of patients treated with a Vanguard endograft was confirmed. Patients with graft-related complications should be treated accordingly.     

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: endovascular repair does not confer any long-term survival advantage over open repair

Recent studies have suggested that endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) may reduce the perioperative mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Whether EVAR confers any long-term survival advantage over published results for open repair of ruptured AAA has not been established. We conducted a single-center retrospective study over a 10-year period (1994-2004) examining the long-term outcome of patients who have undergone endovascular repair of ruptured AAA. Fifty-four patients underwent endovascular repair of a ruptured AAA. The median age was 75 years (interquartile range 69.5-79.5 years); 42 (78%) patients were male. The perioperative mortality rate was 37%. During a median follow-up of 32 months (range 14-48 months), there were 5 aneurysm-related and 13 non-aneurysm-related deaths. Overall, the 3- and 5-year survival rates were 36% and 26%, respectively. EVAR does not appear to confer any overall survival advantage in the mid- to long term compared with the published results for open repair. The reasons for this remain unclear. Further, larger studies are required to confirm these results.     

Surveillance of small aortic aneurysms does not alter anatomic suitability for endovascular repair

OBJECTIVE: Small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs; 4-5.4 cm) are more likely to be suitable for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) than large aortic aneurysms (>5.5 cm). The purpose of this study was to determine whether small AAA growth is associated with the development of morphologic characteristics that decrease eligibility for EVAR. METHODS: We studied 54 patients who underwent 2 or more computed tomography scans with 3-dimensional reconstruction during surveillance of small AAAs. Morphologic aortic aneurysm features and changes were measured according to Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards. Suitability for EVAR was determined by neck anatomy (diameter, length, and angulations), iliac artery morphology, and total aortic aneurysm angulation and tortuosity. RESULTS: The median age of the study cohort was 73 years (interquartile range [IQR], 65-77 years). The median follow-up period was 24 months (IQR, 15-36 months). The median small AAA diameter increased from 44.5 mm (IQR, 41-48 mm) to 48.9 mm (IQR, 45.7-52.0 mm). The median aortic neck diameter increased from 23.0 to 24.0 mm (P = .002), whereas median neck length decreased from 26.5 to 20.0 mm (P = .001). Aortic aneurysm median tortuosity index increased from 1.09 to 1.11 (P = .05). No significant changes in iliac artery morphology occurred. Overall, the anatomic suitability for endovascular repair did not significantly change during the study period (74% vs 69%; McNemar test; P = .25). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in aortic morphology are frequently associated with small AAA growth at mid-term follow-up, but such changes are minor and do not affect overall anatomic suitability for EVAR. These data reveal that continued surveillance of small AAAs does not threaten the window of opportunity for EVAR.     

Aneurysm enlargement following endovascular aneurysm repair: AneuRx clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and significance of aneurysm enlargement, with or without treatment, in relation to the primary end points of rupture, surgical conversion, aneurysm-related death, and survival following endovascular repair. METHOD: Aneurysm (AAA) size changes and clinical outcome of all patients treated from 1997 through 1998 during the Phase II AneuRx multicenter clinical trial of endovascular AAA repair were reviewed. Aneurysm dimensions and the presence or absence of endoleak were determined by an independent core laboratory, with enlargement or shrinkage defined as a diameter change of 5 mm or more compared with baseline. RESULTS: Among 383 patients (89% men, 11% women, age 73 +/- 9 years), with a mean device implant time of 36 +/- 11 months (median = 39 months), aneurysm diameter decreased from 5.7 +/- 1.0 at baseline to 5.2 +/- 1.0 at 3 years (P =.0001). A total of 46 patients (12%) experienced AAA enlargement, 199 patients (52%) had no change in AAA diameter, and 138 patients (36%) had a decrease in AAA diameter of 5 mm or more. Significant risk factors for enlargement included age (enlargement patients were 4 years older on average than patients with aneurysms that decreased in size; P =.002) and the presence of an endoleak (P <.001). Among patients with endoleak at any time, 17% had aneurysm enlargement, whereas only 2% of patients without endoleak had aneurysm enlargement (P <.001). Patients with enlargement were more likely to undergo secondary endovascular procedures and surgical conversions (P <.001). Twenty patients (43%) with enlargement underwent treatment, and 26 patients were untreated. There were two deaths following elective surgical conversion and one death in a patient with untreated enlargement and a type I endoleak. Three aneurysms ruptured: one with enlargement, one with no change, and one with a decrease in aneurysm size; all three aneurysms were larger than 6.5 cm. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that freedom from rupture at 3 years was 98% with enlargement, 99% with no change, and 99% with decrease in AAA size (log-rank test, not significant). Freedom from AAA death at 3 years was 93% in patients with enlargement, 99% in no increase, and 99% in decrease (P =.005). Survival at 3 years was 86% with increase, 82% with no change, and 93% with decrease (P =.02). CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysm enlargement following endovascular repair was not associated with an increased risk of aneurysm rupture or decrease in patient survival during a 3-year observation period. Aneurysm size rather than enlargement may be a more meaningful predictor of rupture. Close follow-up and a high re-intervention rate (43%) may account for the low risk of rupture in patients with enlargement. The long-term significance of aneurysm enlargement following endovascular repair remains to be determined.     

Treatment delays for patients exiting an aortic aneurysm surveillance programme

Background: We have previously reported abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)‐related mortality in patients who have completed surveillance. This study investigates the journey time of patients who exited the AAA surveillance programme at Christchurch Hospital and underwent elective repair to determine the factors contributing to the interval between completing surveillance and undergoing surgical repair. Methods: A retrospective review of patient notes was carried out for 25 patients who underwent elective repair of their AAA after exiting the surveillance programme between November 2000 and September 2005. Results: The median time interval between exiting the programme and undergoing repair for patients fit for repair was 6 months. During this waiting period, there were two aneurysm‐related deaths. Analysis of the patient journeys showed that those with significant comorbidity, that is, patients who required additional investigation by other clinicians (n = 7), had a median time to repair of 35 weeks. This was substantially increased compared with a median time of 22.5 weeks to repair for the rest (n = 18). Conclusion: At our institution the median time for completion of surveillance to repair was 6 months. An AAA with a diameter of 55 mm has an expected risk of rupture of 5%, with mortality approaching 90%. In our series, mortality was 4.9% (two patients died while awaiting repair), consistent with expected figures. Factors contributing to this delay of 6 months to repair were identified. Modifications to this journey are suggested to improve the time interval and therefore hopefully reduce the aneurysm‐related mortality in this group.     

Lessons learned from the long-term follow-up of a first-generation aortic stent graft

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular repair (EVR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is being performed with increasing frequency worldwide. No studies have a complete follow-up of more than 4 years. Our study objective was to assess the long-term results and the durability of a first-generation stent graft with complete 7-year follow-up. METHODS: Between March 1994 and May 1995, 23 consecutive patients underwent treatment with the Chuter stent graft at a single center. All patients underwent computed tomographic scan before discharge, at 3 and 6 months, and annually thereafter. The data were prospectively collected on all patients. The median follow-up period was 72.5 months (range, 0.2 to 91 months). None of the patients were lost to follow-up. RESULTS: Among these 21 men and two women with a median age of 69 years (range, 52 to 85 years), 11 (47.8%) were at high risk. The 30-day technical success rate was 87%. Acute (30-day) complications were one graft deployment failure (4.3%) that necessitated an immediate conversion, 20 intraoperative graft limb kinks (87%), all of which needed additional Wallstent (Schneider, Minneapolis, Minn) placement, four renal failures (17.4%), one type Ia endoleak complicated with AAA rupture (4.3%), and three perioperative deaths (13%). Late complications were eight type I or II endoleaks (34.8%) after a mean delay of 23.9 months (range, 3 to 69 months), 13 proximal stent migrations (56.5%) after a mean delay of 29.6 months (range, 7 to 58 months), six graft limb thromboses (26.1%) after a mean delay of 38.7 months (range, 3 to 71 months), one AAA rupture (4.3%), and 11 deaths (47.8%), with five AAA-related deaths (21.7%). The 3-year, 5-year, and 7-year cumulative endoleak rates were 34%, 41%, and 49%, respectively; the cumulative migration rates were 66%, 75%, and 75%, respectively; and the cumulative open surgery rates were 30%, 50%, and 50%, respectively. At the same intervals, the cumulative survival rates for any death were 69%, 56%, and 49%, respectively; the cumulative survival rates for AAA-related deaths were 82%, 82%, and 73%, respectively; and the cumulative secondary success rates were 54%, 28%, and 28%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This studies emphasizes the need for close lifelong surveillance of AAAs treated with EVR. Despite the small population of this series, a long-term follow-up highlights that the first-generation homemade stent graft evaluated in this study failed to adequately protect the patient from AAA-related death and that most of the serious complications were related to a late failure of the aortic neck attachment. Better proximal fixation of the aortic stent graft is essential to improve the durability of EVR.     

Elective surgery of abdominal aortic aneurysms in octogenarians: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an age-related disease. In an aging population, the prevalence of AAA is likely to increase. Open AAA repair in patients aged >80 years is often not considered because of their advanced age as such or because of comorbidities. In addition, little is known about the natural history in such patients or survival after successful repair. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine peri-operative and late survival after AAA repair in octogenarians METHOD: The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify all studies reporting on octogenarians undergoing AAA repair published between January 1966 and June 2006. Two independent observers assessed the methodologic quality of the included studies and the data extraction. Outcomes were rates of perioperative mortality, complications, and long-term survival after open or endovascular repair (EVAR). Summary estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random effects model. RESULTS: Thirty-nine articles were included. The median aneurysm size was 6.7 cm in the conventional AAA repair group of 1534 patients. The perioperative mortality was 0% to 33%, with a pooled mortality of 7.5% (95% CI, 6.2% to 9.0%). The median 5-year survival rate for this group was 60% (range, 14% to 86%). In the 1045 patients treated with EVAR, the median aneurysm size was 5.9 cm. Their pooled perioperative mortality varied from 0% to 6%, with a pooled mortality of 4.6% (95% CI, 3.4 to 6.0%). We could not derive 5-year survival rates from articles describing endovascular repair of AAA. CONCLUSION: The mortality rate after open or endovascular AAA repair in carefully selected octogenarians seems acceptable but is higher than the mortality rate in younger patients. Long-term survival rates were acceptable, but small sample size, selection, and publication bias must be taken into account. Finally, selection criteria for successful surgery with low mortality and morbidity rates cannot be derived from the literature.     

肾下型腹主动脉瘤的外科治疗

目的总结26例肾下型腹主动脉瘤的手术治疗经验。方法回顾性分析近5年多来手术治疗26例肾下型腹主动脉瘤的临床资料，全组26例，术前均经影像检查证实诊断。行择期手术21例，破裂型腹主动脉瘤急诊手术5例。26例均行腹主动脉瘤切除，人工血管重建术。结果围手术期死亡2例，均为急症手术患者，总病死率7．7％，急诊手术病死率40．0％。随访时间1-5年。术后1，3，5年生存率分别为96％，88％，75％。死亡原因均与腹主动脉瘤和手术无关。结论CTA检查是诊断腹主动脉瘤的可靠方法。手术治疗仍是治疗腹主动脉瘤的重要方法。瘤体直径不是决定手术的唯一指征。影响手术的危险因素主要是高龄、严重的心肺疾病和肾功能不全。     

Mid-term results of a second generation bifurcated endovascular graft for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: the French Vanguard trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively the results of the bifurcated Vanguard endovascular graft for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: Seventy-five patients, with a median age of 69.6 years (range, 48 to 88 years) and asymptomatic AAAs, were recruited in 14 French vascular institutions. An independent committee validated the indications for endovascular repair, and all the implantations were supervised by a well-trained medico-technical assistant. Further independent committees reviewed patient data, clinical data, and imaging follow-up examination. The main endpoints were implantation success, mortality, morbidity, reinterventions, and aneurysm evolution assessed with serial computed tomographic (CT) scanning. RESULTS: All the grafts were successfully implanted, resulting in a 100% success rate on an intent-to-treat basis. At discharge, there were no deaths, six significant local complications (8%) that necessitated surgery, no vascular complications, and six systemic complications (8%). The average durations of intensive care unit and hospital stays were 26 +/- 6 hours and 6 +/- 2.54 days, respectively. Predischarge CT scan results showed five type I and 18 type II endoleaks (total, 30%). At the end of the follow-up period (mean duration, 18.35 +/- 4.12 months; range, 17 days to 24 months), seven patients (9%) had died: one from sepsis, five from unrelated causes, and one from aneurysm rupture. The 2-year cumulative survival rate was 86% +/- 5.9%. Twenty-one subsequent endovascular or vascular procedures were necessitated (28%) in 17 patients (23%) to treat graft limb occlusion or stenosis (n = 9 patients) or to seal an endoleak (n = 8 patients). The 2-year cumulative survival rate free of reintervention was 67% +/- 7%. On CT scans, the mean AAA diameter decreased from 54 mm +/- 8.9 (range, 45 to 80 mm) before surgery to 51.6 mm +/- 9.1 at 6 months and to 43.4 mm +/- 4.4 at the end of the follow-up period (P =.001). Persistent endoleak was significantly associated with an increase in diameter (4 of 5 [80%] vs 1 of 47 [2%]; P =.001). CONCLUSION: In selected patients, the bifurcated Vanguard endovascular graft may be implanted with a low mortality and morbidity rate and a favorable mid-term survival rate. The decrease of the aneurysm size is a strong argument in favor of the efficiency of the device. However, lasting endoleaks with increased aneurysm diameter and occurrence of limb graft stenosis or occlusion raise concerns and justify a careful long-term follow-up monitoring of all patients who undergo treatment with endovascular technique.     

Endovascular repair or surveillance of patients with small AAA.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) treated in a prospective trial of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) to patients randomized to the surveillance arm of the UK Small Aneurysm Trial. METHOD: All patients with small AAA (< or = 5.5 cm diameter) treated with a stent graft (EVARsmall) in the multicenter AneuRx clinical trial from 1997 to 1999 were reviewed with follow up through 2003. A subgroup of patients (EVARmatch) who met the age (60-76 years) and aneurysm size (4.0-5.5 cm diameter) inclusion criteria of the UK Small Aneurysm Trial were compared to the published results of the surveillance patient cohort (UKsurveil) of the UK Small Aneurysm Trial (NEJM 346:1445, 2002). Endpoints of comparison were aneurysm rupture, fatal aneurysm rupture, operative mortality, aneurysm related death and overall mortality. The total patient years of follow-up for EVAR patients was 1369 years and for UK patients was 3048 years. Statistical comparisons of EVARmatch and UKsurveil patients were made for rates per 100 patient years of follow up (/100 years) to adjust for differences in follow-up time. RESULTS: The EVARsmall group of 478 patients comprised 40% of the total number of patients treated during the course of the AneuRx clinical trial. The EVARmatch group of 312 patients excluded 151 patients for age < 60 or > 76 years and 15 patients for AAA diameter < 4 cm. With the exception of age, there were no significant differences between EVARsmall and EVARmatch in pre-operative factors or post-operative outcomes. In comparison to the UKsurveil group of 527 patients, the EVARmatch group was slightly older (70 +/- 4 vs. 69 +/- 4 years, p = 0.009), had larger aneurysms (5.0 +/- 0.3 vs. 4.6 +/- 0.4 cm, p < 0.001), fewer women (7 vs. 18%, p < 0.001), and had a higher prevalence of diabetes and hypertension and a lower prevalence of smoking at baseline. Ruptures occurred in 1.6% of EVARmatch patients and 5.1% of UKsurveil patients; this difference was not significant when adjusted for the difference in length of follow up. Fatal aneurysm rupture rate, adjusted for follow up time, was four times higher in UKsurveil (0.8/100 patient years) than in EVARmatch (0.2/100 patient years, p < 0.001); this difference remained significant when adjusted for difference in gender mix. Elective operative mortality rate was significantly lower in EVARmatch (1.9%) than in UKsurveil (5.9%, p < 0.01). Aneurysm-related death rate was two times higher in UKsurveil (1.6/100 patient years) than in EVARmatch (0.8/100 patient years, p = 0.03). All-cause mortality rate was significantly higher in UKsurveil (8.3/100 patient years) than in EVARmatch (6.4/100 patient years, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: It appears that endovascular repair of small abdominal aortic aneurysms (4.0-5.5 cm) significantly reduces the risk of fatal aneurysm rupture and aneurysm-related death and improves overall patient survival compared to an ultrasound surveillance strategy with selective open surgical repair.     

Influence of sex on expansion rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND: The UK Small Aneurysm Trial suggested that female sex is an independent risk factor for rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). This study assessed the effect of sex on the growth rate of AAA. METHODS: Between January 1985 and August 2005 all patients who were referred to the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh with an AAA who were not considered for early aneurysm repair were assessed by serial abdominal ultrasonography. Maximum anteroposterior and transverse diameters of the AAAs were measured. RESULTS: A total of 1255 patients (824 men and 431 women) were followed up for a median of 30 (range 6-185) months. A median of six examinations (range 2-37) was performed for each patient. Median diameter on initial examination was 41 (range 25-83) mm. Median growth rate overall was 2.79 (range - 4.80-37.02) mm per year. Median growth rate of AAA was significantly greater in women than men (3.67 (range - 1.2-37.02) versus 2.03 (range - 4.80-21.00) mm per year; P < 0.01). Weighted linear regression analysis revealed that large initial anteroposterior AAA diameter and female sex were significant predictors of faster aneurysm growth rate (P < 0.001 and P = 0.006 respectively). CONCLUSION: The growth rate of AAA was significantly greater in women than in men. This may have implications for the frequency of follow-up and timing of repair of AAA in women.     

Does the presence of an iliac aneurysm affect outcome of endoluminal AAA repair? An analysis of 336 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the presence of an iliac aneurysm compromises outcome of endovascular exclusion of AAA and to ascertain the fate of the iliac aneurysmal sac. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 1997 and March 2001, data on 336 consecutive patients undergoing endovascular repair for AAA were entered in a prospective database. Suitability for endovascular repair was assessed by preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography. A maximum common iliac artery (CIA) diameter > or = 20 mm was defined as iliac aneurysm. Patients with and without iliac aneurysms were compared to early (immediate conversion or perioperative death) and late failure (increase in aneurysm diameter or persisting graft-related endoleak, or late AAA rupture or conversion). RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (18%) had iliac aneurysms, 19 were bilateral, for a total of 78 aneurysmal iliac arteries (median diameter 23 mm; range 20-50 mm). A distal seal was achieved by landing in 33 external iliac arteries, in 20 ectatic CIAs, and in 25 normal CIAs. Operating time differed significantly between patients with and without CIA aneurysms (153 +/- 71 vs 123 +/- 55 min, p = 0.0001), whereas no statistically significant differences were found with respect to early and late failure (2% vs 3%, p = 0.5 and 14% vs 8%, p = 0.11, respectively). There were no cases of buttock or colon necrosis. At a median follow-up of 14 months (range 0-46; i.q.r. 7-27 months) common iliac diameter decreased > or = 2 mm in 49 cases, remained stable in 25, and increased > or = 2 mm in 3. CONCLUSION: The presence of iliac aneurysm rendered endoluminal AAA repair more complex but did not affect feasibility and long-term outcome of the procedure. In our experience internal iliac exclusion was never associated with significant morbidity. These data may be useful when considering endovascular repair in high-risk patients with challenging anatomy.     

Is abdominal aortic aneurysm repair appropriate in oxygen-dependent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients?

BACKGROUND: The life expectancy of patients with oxygen-dependent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is significantly reduced, but the risk of any intervention is considered prohibitive. However, severe COPD may increase the risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture. We reviewed our experience with AAA repair in oxygen-dependent patients to determine whether operative risk and expected long-term survival justify surgical intervention. METHODS: A retrospective review of 44 consecutive patients with oxygen-dependent COPD undergoing AAA repair over an 8-year period was performed. Information was recorded for survival, length of follow-up, patient age, medical comorbidities, pulmonary function tests, and operative approach. Survival data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with published cohorts of oxygen-dependent patients and the natural history of untreated aneurysms. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), and 20 underwent open procedures (14 retroperitoneal and 6 transabdominal). The mean AAA diameter was 6.1 cm (range, 5-9.5 cm). The mean age was 71.4 years, and 82% of patients were male. Operative mortality was 0%. The mean length of stay was 11.2 days for open procedures and 4.3 days for EVAR (significantly longer than that for standard-risk patients). The mean survival time was 37.9 months (range, 2-91 months). Preoperative medical comorbidities, type of repair, and pulmonary function tests were not predictive of survival. Postoperative morbidity was significantly higher with open repair. Long term survival was comparable to historical series of the natural history of O2 dependent patients without AAA but better than untreated 6 cm AAA cohorts. At 42 months, almost 50% of patients in our study group were still alive, compared to 20% survival at 34 months for those with untreated 6 cm AAAs. CONCLUSIONS: It is reasonable to continue to offer AAA repair to home oxygen-dependent COPD patients who are ambulatory and medically optimized and who are without untreated coronary artery disease. Although EVAR may be the most suitable treatment for oxygen-dependent COPD patients, our results show that even open repair may be safely performed in this population, with acceptable results.     

Device migration after endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: analysis of 113 cases with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years

PURPOSE: Device migration (DM) has been shown to cause late failure after endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. To establish the incidence rate and the predictive factors of distal migration of the proximal portion of the endograft, computed tomographic (CT) scans performed at different time intervals during follow-up examination of 113 patients were reviewed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 1997 and March 1999, 148 patients underwent endoluminal AAA repair with a modular endograft with infrarenal fixation (Medtronic-AVE AneuRx, Santa Rosa, Calif) at our unit. CT scans performed at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery and yearly thereafter were prospectively stored in a computer imaging database. Patient demographics, risk factors, operative details, and follow-up events were prospectively collected. No patients were lost to follow-up examination. Twelve patients died within 2 years of surgery, four patients underwent immediate conversion to open repair, and adequate CT measurements were not feasible in 19 cases, which left 113 patients available for a minimum 2-year assessment and 418 CT scan results reviewed. Two vascular surgeons, blinded to patient identity and history with tested interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.64), separately reviewed axial reconstructions of CT scans. DM was defined as changes of 10 mm or more in the distance between the lower renal artery and the first visible portion of the endograft at follow-up examination. Ten possible independent predictors of DM were analyzed with multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: One AAA rupture, which was successfully treated, occurred at a mean follow-up period of 28 months (range, 24 to 46 months). Seventeen patients (15%) showed DM. Eight patients (47%) with DM underwent reintervention: a proximal cuff was positioned in six patients and late conversion to open repair was performed in two patients. Of the 10 variables analyzed with Cox proportional hazards regression model, AAA neck enlargement of more than 10% after endoluminal repair (hazard ratio, 7.3; confidence interval, 1.8 to 29.2; P =.004) and preoperative AAA diameter of 55 mm or more (hazard ratio, 4.5; confidence interval, 1.2 to 16.7; P =.02) were positive independent predictors of DM. The probability of DM at 36 months was 27% according to life table analysis. CONCLUSION: DM occurred in a significant portion of our patients, yet aggressive follow-up examination and a high reintervention rate prevented aneurysm-related death. According to our data, dilatation of the infrarenal aortic neck is an important factor that contributes to the distal migration of stent grafts, and patients with large aneurysms are at high risk for DM.     

Long-Term Survival and Quality of Life After Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Background

Open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) generally involves postsurgery admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Few studies have evaluated the impact of surgery for either ruptured or nonruptured AAA (with postoperative ICU treatment) on long-term survival and quality of life. The primary aim of this study was to quantify long-term survival and health-related quality of life (HrQpL) of a cohort of patients undergoing open AAA repair after hospital discharge.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing open elective or acute AAA reconstruction with postoperative admission to the ICU and discharged alive from the hospital during 2009 were identified. Primary outcome measures were 1-year and long-term mortality. The secondary outcome was the HrQoL using the EuroQol-6D (EQ-6D) questionnaire at the end of the follow-up period.

Results

A total of 263 patients were treated and postoperatively discharged alive: 56 had a ruptured AAA (rAAA), 35 a symptomatic AAA, and 172 an asymptomatic AAA. The 1-year mortality after open AAA repair was 8 %. Overall, 39 % of patients died within 10 postoperative years (mean 6.0 ± 2.8 years). Long-term survival of patients with a ruptured or symptomatic aneurysm was similar to that of patients undergoing elective aneurysm repair. Long-term HrQoL of the total study population was worse than that of an age-matched general Dutch population on the EQ-us (range 0–1, difference 0.12). This decrease in HrQoL was mainly seen in mobility, self-care, usual activities, and cognition.

Conclusions

Ten years after open AAA repair, the overall survival rate was 59 %. Long-term survival and HrQoL were similar for patients with a repaired ruptured or symptomatic aneurysm and those who underwent elective aneurysm repair. There were also no differences in patients with infrarenal versus juxtarenal/suprarenal aneurysms. Surviving patients had a lower HrQoL than the age-matched general Dutch population, especially regarding mobility, self-care, usual activities, and cognition.     

Elective endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in octogenarians

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is an increasingly popular treatment option for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), although open repair is considered the standard by virtue of its durability. Octogenarians, as a subgroup, may stand to benefit the most by EVAR. The purpose of this study is to review operative results and durability of open AAA repair and EVAR in octogenarians. METHODS: From May 1996 to August 2006, 150 patients aged >or=80 years underwent elective repair of their infrarenal AAA. Eighty-one underwent EVAR and 69 had open repair. Demographic data, aneurysm specifics, comorbidities, operative morbidity and mortality, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and late outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: In the EVAR group, 27 of 81 (33%) patients died during a mean follow-up of 25 months. In the open repair group, 34 of 69 (49%) patients died during a mean follow-up of 43 months. The median survival time for EVAR was 350 weeks (range, 145-404 weeks) compared with 317 weeks (range, 233-342 weeks) for the open repair group. A Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis showed no difference in early or long-term survival between EVAR and open repair (P = .13). EVAR was associated with decreased blood loss, decreased length of intensive care unit and hospital stays, and a greater number of patients discharged to home. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR and open repair are comparable in safety and efficacy in octogenarians. Operative repair outcomes remain acceptable. Mid- and long-term survival are similar, indicating no survival advantage of one procedure compared with the other.     

Long-term outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: the first decade

OBJECTIVE: The proper role of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) remains controversial, largely due to uncertain late results. We reviewed a 12-year experience with EVAR to document late outcomes. METHODS: During the interval January 7, 1994 through December 31, 2005, 873 patients underwent EVAR utilizing 10 different stent graft devices. Primary outcomes examined included operative mortality, aneurysm rupture, aneurysm-related mortality, open surgical conversion, and late survival rates. The incidence of endoleak, migration, aneurysm enlargement, and graft patency was also determined. Finally, the need for reintervention and success of such secondary procedures were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate methodology were used for analysis. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 75.7 years (range, 49-99 years); 81.4% were male. Mean follow-up was 27 months; 39.3% of patients had 2 or more major comorbidities, and 19.5% would be categorized as unfit for open repair. On an intent-to-treat basis, device deployment was successful in 99.3%. Thirty-day mortality was 1.8%. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, freedom from AAA rupture was 97.6% at 5 years and 94% at 9 years. Significant risk factors for late AAA rupture included female gender (odds ratio OR, 6.9; P = 0.004) and device-related endoleak (OR, 16.06; P = 0.009). Aneurysm-related death was avoided in 96.1% of patients, with the need for any reintervention (OR, 5.7 P = 0.006), family history of aneurysmal disease (OR, 9.5; P = 0.075), and renal insufficiency (OR, 7.1; P = 0.003) among its most important predictors. 87 (10%) patients required reintervention, with 92% of such procedures being catheter-based and a success rate of 84%. Significant predictors of reintervention included use of first-generation devices (OR, 1.2; P < 0.01) and late onset endoleak (OR, 64; P < 0.001). Current generation stent grafts correlated with significantly improved outcomes. Cumulative freedom from conversion to open repair was 93.3% at 5 through 9 years, with the need for prior reintervention (OR, 16.7; P = 0.001) its most important predictor. Cumulative survival was 52% at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR using contemporary devices is a safe, effective, and durable method to prevent AAA rupture and aneurysm-related death. Assuming suitable AAA anatomy, these data justify a broad application of EVAR across a wide spectrum of patients.     

Late survival after elective repair of aortic aneurysms detected by screening.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine whether there was any survival advantage in men following elective repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) detected by ultrasound screening compared to those with an AAA detected incidentally. METHODS: A total of 424 men underwent elective AAA repair between 1990 and 1998; 181 were detected in an aneurysm screening programme and 243 were diagnosed incidentally. Follow-up survival data were collected until 2003 (minimum 5 years) and survival curves were compared using regression analysis. RESULTS: The postoperative 30-day mortality rate was significantly lower in men whose aneurysms were detected by screening (4.4%), compared with those detected incidentally (9.0%). Similarly, 5-year survival (78% vs. 65%) and 10-year survival rates (63% vs. 40%) were better after repair of a screen-detected AAA (p<0.0003 at all time intervals, by log rank testing). Multivariate analysis showed that this was largely due to the older age of men who had repair of an incidental AAA (71.2 vs. 67.1 years). CONCLUSION: Men who had elective repair of an AAA detected by screening had a better late survival rate than men whose aneurysm was discovered incidentally because they were younger at the time of surgery.