High-density vs low-density lipoprotein cholesterol as the risk factor for coronary artery disease and stroke in old age

BACKGROUND: A high total serum cholesterol level does not carry a risk of cardiovascular mortality among people 85 years and older and is related to decreased all-cause mortality. At this old age, there are few data on fractionated lipoprotein levels in the determination of cardiovascular disease risk. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationships between low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels and mortality from specific causes among people in the oldest age categories. METHODS: Between September 1, 1997, and September 1, 1999, a total of 705 inhabitants in the community of Leiden, the Netherlands, reached the age of 85 years. Among these old people, we initiated a prospective follow-up study to investigate determinants of successful aging. A total of 599 subjects participated (response rate, 87%) and all were followed up to September 2001. Serum levels of total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol were assessed at baseline along with detailed information on comorbid conditions. The main outcome measure was all-cause and specific mortality risk. RESULTS: During 4 years of follow-up, 152 subjects died. The leading cause of death was cardiovascular disease, with similar mortality risks in all tertiles of LDL cholesterol level. In contrast, low HDL cholesterol level was associated with a 2.0-fold higher risk of fatal cardiovascular disease (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.2). The mortality risk of coronary artery disease was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.0-3.9) and for stroke it was 2.6 (95% CI, 1.0-6.6). Both low LDL cholesterol and low HDL cholesterol concentrations were associated with an increased mortality risk of infection: 2.7 (95% CI, 1.2-6.2) and 2.4 (95% CI, 1.1-5.6), respectively. The risks were unaffected by comorbidity. CONCLUSION: In contrast to high LDL cholesterol level, low HDL cholesterol level is a risk factor for mortality from coronary artery disease and stroke in old age.     

Small dense low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol is a promising biomarker for secondary prevention in older men with stable coronary artery disease

Aim

The study objective was to investigate whether small dense low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (sdLDL‐C) is superior to low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) and other biomarkers to predict future cardiovascular events (CE) in secondary prevention.

Methods

sdLDL‐C measured by a homogeneous assay, remnant lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL particle diameter and other biomarkers were compared in 345 men aged ≥65 years with stable coronary artery disease. Baseline LDL‐C was 100.5 ± 30.1 mg/dL. CE including cardiovascular death, onset of acute coronary syndrome, need for arterial revascularization, hospitalization for heart failure, surgery procedure for cardiovascular disease and hospitalization for stroke were monitored for 5 years.

Results

CE occurred in 96 patients during the study period. LDL‐C, sdLDL‐C non‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, remnant lipoprotein cholesterol, glucose, glycated hemoglobin and brain natriuretic peptide were significantly higher; LDL particle diameter and apolipoprotein A‐1 were significantly lower in patients with than in those without CE. Age‐adjusted Cox regression analysis showed that sdLDL‐C per 10 mg/dL, but not LDL‐C, was significantly associated with CE (HR 1.206, 95% CI 1.006–1.446). A significant association of sdLDL‐C and incident CE was observed in statin users (HR 1.252, 95% CI 1.017–1.540), diabetes patients (HR 1.219, 95% CI 1.018–1.460), patients without diabetes (HR 1.257, 95% CI 1.019–1.551) and patients with hypertriglyceridemia (HR 1. 376, 95% CI 1.070–1.770).

Conclusions

sdLDL‐C was the most effective predictor of residual risk of future CE in stable coronary artery disease patients using statins and in high‐risk coronary artery disease patients with diabetes or hypertriglyceridemia. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 965–972 .     

Effect of low-density lipoprotein apheresis on lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2

Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) (Lp-PLA(2)) is a proinflammatory participant in atherosclerosis and a potential biomarker for coronary heart disease. The effects of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis on Lp-PLA(2) levels were evaluated in 8 patients with cardiovascular disease. Each patient received 5 LDL apheresis treatments over a 3-month period. The mean direct LDL cholesterol level reduction was 60% (252 to 100 mg/dl). LDL apheresis acutely reduced Lp-PLA(2) by 21.4%. Over the course of treatment, Lp-PLA(2) levels were reduced by 29%. Chronic LDL apheresis significantly reduces Lp-PLA(2) independent of LDL cholesterol, which may be a potential mechanism by which LDL apheresis diminishes coronary heart disease risk.     

Lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-I and B and lipoprotein (a) abnormalities in men with premature coronary artery disease.

The prevalence of abnormalities of lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoproteins A-I and B and lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] was determined in 321 men (mean age 50 +/- 7 years) with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and compared with that in 901 control subjects from the Framingham Offspring Study (mean age 49 +/- 6 years) who were clinically free of coronary artery disease. After correction for sampling in hospital, beta-adrenergic medication use and effects of diet, patients had significantly higher cholesterol levels (224 +/- 53 vs. 214 +/- 36 mg/dl), triglycerides (189 +/- 95 vs. 141 +/- 104 mg/dl), low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (156 +/- 51 vs. 138 +/- 33 mg/dl), apolipoprotein B (131 +/- 37 vs. 108 +/- 33 mg/dl) and Lp(a) levels (19.9 +/- 19 vs. 14.9 +/- 17.5 mg/dl). They also had significantly lower high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (36 +/- 11 vs. 45 +/- 12 mg/dl) and apolipoprotein A-I levels (114 +/- 26 vs. 136 +/- 32 mg/dl) (all p less than 0.005). On the basis of Lipid Research Clinic 90th percentile values for triglycerides and LDL cholesterol and 10th percentile values for HDL cholesterol, the most frequent dyslipidemias were low HDL cholesterol alone (19.3% vs. 4.4%), elevated LDL cholesterol (12.1% vs. 9%), hypertriglyceridemia with low HDL cholesterol (9.7% vs. 4.2%), hypertriglyceridemia and elevated LDL cholesterol with low HDL cholesterol (3.4% vs. 0.2%) and Lp(a) excess (15.8% vs. 10%) in patients versus control subjects, respectively (p less than 0.05). Stepwise discriminant analysis indicates that smoking, hypertension, decreased apolipoprotein A-I, increased apolipoprotein B, increased Lp(a) and diabetes are all significant (p less than 0.05) factors in descending order of importance in distinguishing patients with coronary artery disease from normal control subjects. Not applying a correction for beta-adrenergic blocking agents, sampling bias and diet effects leads to a serious underestimation of the prevalence of LDL abnormalities and an overestimation of HDL abnormalities in patients with coronary artery disease. However, 35% of patients had a total cholesterol level less than 200 mg/dl after correction; of those patients, 73% had an HDL cholesterol level less than 35 mg/dl.     

Importance of lipoprotein metabolism parameters in the clinical and angiographic severity of coronary artery disease.

Coronary artery disease that is clinically and angiographically significant is associated to important biochemical parameters with direct interference in lipoprotein and apoprotein metabolism. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the importance of several lipoprotein metabolic parameters in the clinical and angiographic severity of chronic coronary artery disease. In a population with the diagnosis of ischemic coronary artery disease, we assessed the degree of angiographic (single- versus multivessel disease) and clinical (C.C.S. I-IV classification) severities. In each patient, we determined the value of total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL and LDL cholesterol, HDL 2 and 3, apoprotein AI and B, lipoprotein (a), anti-phospholipid antibodies and C reactive protein. Our results showed that some parameters were significant in the comparison between a normal group and the global coronary artery disease population, such as the value of total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, HDL 2, apoprotein AI and B lipoprotein (a) and anti-phospholipid antibodies. In the distinction of coronary artery disease subgroups, in relation to C.C.S. < or = 2 and > or = 3 classes, some factors could be discriminated, such as HDL cholesterol, HDL 2, total cholesterol/HDL, lipoprotein (a), anti-phospholipid antibodies and C reactive protein. In the distinction between classes C.C.S. < or = 2 and AMI, the levels of triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, HDL 2, total cholesterol/HDL, lipoprotein (a) and anti-phospholipid antibodies were significant. In the division between single vessel versus multivessel coronary artery disease we found significant values of HDL cholesterol, HDL 2, total cholesterol/HDL, apoprotein AI, lipoprotein (a), anti-phospholipid antibodies and C reactive protein. In conclusion, our present study endorses the clinical role of lipids and plasma lipoproteins in the determination of several cardiovascular risk factors, but introduction of new parameters such as lipoprotein (a) and the anti-phospholipid antibodies can be very useful for a better and global understanding of the pathophysiological processes and distinction of higher risk subgroups for extension and degree of severity of ischemic coronary artery disease.     

Lipoprotein(a) further increases the risk of coronary events in men with high global cardiovascular risk

OBJECTIVES: This prospective population study was conducted to assess the role of elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a coronary risk factor. BACKGROUND: The role of elevated Lp(a) as a risk factor for coronary heart disease is controversial. In addition, little attention has been paid to the interaction of Lp(a) with other risk factors. METHODS: A total of 788 male participants of the Prospective Cardiovascular Münster (PROCAM) study aged 35 to 65 years were followed for 10 years. Both Lp(a) and traditional cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., age, low density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol, high density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol, triglycerides, systolic blood pressure, cigarette smoking, diabetes mellitus, angina pectoris, and family history of myocardial infarction) were evaluated in 44 men who suffered from myocardial infarction, and in 744 men who survived without major coronary events or stroke. A multiple logistic function algorithm was used to estimate global cardiovascular risk by the combined effects of traditional risk factors. RESULTS: Overall, the risk of a coronary event in men with an Lp(a) > or =0.2 g/liter was 2.7 times that of men with lower levels (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4 to 5.2). This increase in risk was most prominent in men with LDL cholesterol level > or =4.1 mmol/liter (relative risk [RR]: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.2 to 5.7), with HDL cholesterol < or =0.9 mmol/liter (RR 8.3; 95% CI: 2.0 to 35.5), with hypertension (RR 3.2; 95% CI: 1.4 to 7.2), or within the two highest global risk quintiles (relative risk: 2.7; 95% CI: 1.3 to 5.7). CONCLUSIONS: Lp(a) increases the coronary risk, especially in men with high LDL cholesterol, low HDL cholesterol, hypertension and/or high global cardiovascular risk.     

High density lipoprotein cholesterol in male relatives of patients with coronary heart disease.

To study factors that play a role in the familial occurrence of coronary heart disease, very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) triglycerides, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol were measured after preparative ultracentrifugation in first degree male relatives of coronary patients and in control subjects. The HDL cholesterol concentration was significantly lower in relatives of 20--71 years old than in controls. No increase of serum and LDL cholesterol was found. A low level of HDL cholesterol was observed even in the younger relatives who are less likely to have cardiovascualr disease. In older relatives low HDL cholesterol was found in the presence or absence of clinical evidence of coronary artery disease. The HDL-cholesterol concentration was inversely related to the VLDL triglycerides both in relatives and controls, but the regression lines were different ((P less than 0.001) for the relative (y = --0.166x + 0.43) and for the controls (y = 0.191x + 0.49). A low HDL cholesterol level appears to be a marker of relatives of coronary patients.     

Serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol correlates with presence but not severity of coronary artery disease

An elevated serum level of low density lipoprotein (LDL) is a risk factor for the development of coronary artery disease, whereas elevated levels of high density lipoprotein (HDL) appear to have a protective effect, and the total cholesterol to HDL ratio has been suggested as an improved method for assessing risk. We determined cholesterol, HDL and triglycerides in 189 patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization to determine if these variables correlate with the severity of coronary artery disease assessed as the number of major coronary vessels having ≥ 70 percent stenosis. HDL was higher in the group with zero vessel disease (54 ± 2.3 mg/dl ± SEM) than in those with one, two or three vessel disease (43 ± 1.8, 45 ± 1.8 and 51 ± 1.2, respectively), and the cholesterol to HDL ratio was lower in the group with zero vessel disease (4.1 ± 0.2 compared to 6.1 ± 0.3, 5.7 ± 0.2 and 6.4 ± 0.3 in the groups with 1, 2 and 3 vessel disease).Using analysis of variance, patients with no coronary artery disease (zero vessel disease) differed from those with coronary artery disease in HDL (p < 0.005), triglycerides (p > 0.01), cholesterol (p < 0.005) and cholesterol to HDL (p > 0.005), but no significant differences were found between patients with coronary artery disease and a different number of vessels involved. There were no significant differences between the groups in age, and although the group with zero vessel disease had more females than the others, there were no differences in cholesterol, HDL, cholesterol to HDL ratio, or triglycerides between male and female patients with no coronary artery disease. We conclude that the cholesterol to HDL ratio correlates with the presence but not severity of coronary artery disease.     

Effects of extended-release niacin on lipoprotein particle size, distribution, and inflammatory markers in patients with coronary artery disease

In this study, niacin was added to existing therapy for 3 months in 54 subjects with stable coronary artery disease. Average total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and triglyceride levels were similar between groups. Three months of niacin treatment increased total HDL by 7.5% and decreased triglycerides by 15% compared with baseline values (p <0.005 for each), whereas total cholesterol and LDL levels remained unchanged. Addition of niacin resulted in a 32% increase in large-particle HDL (p <0.001), an 8% decrease in small-particle HDL (p = 0.0032), an 82% increase in large-particle LDL (p = 0.09), and a 12% decrease in small-particle LDL (p = 0.008). Niacin decreased lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 and C-reactive protein levels (20% and 15%, respectively, p <0.05 for the 2 comparisons). No significant changes from baseline were seen in any tested parameter in subjects who received placebo. In conclusion, addition of niacin to existing medical regimens for patients with coronary artery disease and already well-controlled LDL levels favorably improves the distribution of lipoprotein particle sizes and inflammatory markers in a manner that would be expected to confer atheroprotection. The effect of altering lipoprotein particle distribution and inflammatory markers on surrogate markers of atherosclerosis and clinical cardiovascular events in this population remains unclear.     

Relation of angiographically defined coronary artery disease to serum lipoprotein levels

The relationship of coronary artery disease to plasma lipoproteins was examined in 43 men admitted to our unit with suspected ischemic heart disease. Coronary arteriography was performed, and a score reflecting the severity of disease was assigned to the angiogram. Plasma, obtained after a 12-h overnight fast, was assayed for triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and HDL-3 cholesterol. HDL-2 cholesterol was found by subtraction. The cholesterol contents of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) were quantitated by the Freidwald equation. Men with high coronary scores tended to be older, and subjects with moderate coronary disease had significantly higher total and LDL cholesterol values than those with minimal disease. Age was the only factor to be significantly associated with coronary score and there was no significant association between coronary score and total LDL and HDL cholesterol or its subfractions when the age factor was taken into account.     

Comparison of once-daily,niacin extended-release/lovastatin with standard doses of atorvastatin and simvastatin (the ADvicor Versus Other Cholesterol-Modulating Agents Trial Evaluation [ADVOCATE])

This study compared the relative efficacy of a once-daily niacin extended-release (ER)/lovastatin fixed-dose combination with standard doses of atorvastatin or simvastatin, with a special emphasis on relative starting doses. Subjects (n = 315) with elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and decreased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol blood levels (defined as LDL cholesterol blood levels > or =160 mg/dl without coronary artery disease, or > or =130 mg/dl if coronary artery disease was present, and HDL cholesterol <45 mg/dl in men and <50 mg/dl in women) were randomized to atorvastatin, simvastatin, or niacin ER/lovastatin for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy variables were the mean percent change in LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol levels from baseline. After 8 weeks, the starting dose niacin ER/lovastatin 1,000/40 mg and the 10-mg starting dose atorvastatin both lowered mean LDL cholesterol by 38%. After 12 weeks, niacin ER/lovastatin 1,000/40 mg lowered LDL cholesterol by 42% versus 34% with the 20-mg starting dose of simvastatin (p <0.001). Niacin ER/lovastatin increased HDL cholesterol significantly more than atorvastatin or simvastatin at all compared doses (p <0.001). Niacin ER/lovastatin also provided significant improvements in triglycerides, lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein A-1, apolipoprotein B, and HDL subfractions. A total of 6% of study subjects receiving niacin ER/lovastatin withdrew because of flushing. No significant differences were seen among study groups in discontinuance due to elevated liver enzymes. No drug-induced myopathy was observed. Niacin ER/lovastatin was comparable to atorvastatin 10 mg and more effective than simvastatin 20 mg in reducing LDL cholesterol, was more effective in increasing HDL cholesterol than either atorvastatin or simvastatin, and provided greater global improvements in non-HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and lipoprotein(a).     

Achieving optimal lipid goals in patients with coronary artery disease

Guidelines for lipid-lowering therapy recommend intensive low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol lowering for patients with coronary artery disease. Previous studies have found that many high-risk patients are not achieving their LDL cholesterol goals, and many patients, despite being treated with lipid-lowering therapy, also have elevated triglycerides or low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. To evaluate lipid goals in a "real world" clinical setting, the electronic medical records of 10,040 patients with coronary artery disease from a large cardiology subspecialty practice from September 2008 to September 2009 were reviewed. Overall, 79% of patients achieved an LDL cholesterol goal of <100 mg/dl, while only 35% achieved the more aggressive goal of <70 mg/dl. Non-HDL cholesterol goals of <130 and <100 mg/dl were achieved in 79% and 44% of patients, respectively. Only 69% achieved normal triglyceride levels, and only 63% of men and 56% of women achieved normal levels of HDL cholesterol. Women and younger men were less likely to achieve their lipid goals. In conclusion, most patients with coronary artery disease achieve the minimal LDL cholesterol goal of 100 mg/dl, but few achieve the more aggressive goals of <70 mg/dl. Many high-risk patients have elevated levels of triglycerides or low levels of HDL cholesterol despite treatment. Combination lipid-lowering therapy is used infrequently in practice. There exists a significant opportunity for physicians to more aggressively treat lipids to achieve the levels recommended by clinical guidelines.     

Accuracy of the ratio of triglycerides to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol for predicting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol particle sizes, phenotype B, and particle concentrations among Asian Indians

Asian Indians have unusually high rates of coronary artery disease. Small low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle predominance (phenotype B) is associated with a fourfold atherogenic risk. This study examined the accuracy of a triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) ratio of > or =3.8 (determined from the Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines, normal triglycerides <150 mg/dl and HDL >40 mg/dl) for predicting phenotype B in Asian Indians. Fasting blood samples were collected from 150 healthy Asian Indians. LDL size analysis was performed by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The triglyceride/HDL cholesterol ratio correlated inversely with the LDL size and positively with the particle concentration. A triglyceride/HDL cholesterol ratio of > or =3.8 had 76% sensitivity, 93% specificity, and 83% positive and 89% negative predictive values for predicting phenotype B.     

Accuracy of the triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio for prediction of the low-density lipoprotein phenotype B

This study examined the accuracy of a triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol ratio of 3.8 for the prediction of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) phenotype B. The ratio of 3.8 was based on Adult Treatment Panel recommendations for normal fasting triglycerides (<150 mg/dl) and HDL cholesterol (>40 mg/dl). Fasting blood samples were obtained from 658 patients. LDL phenotype analysis was performed by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. A triglyceride/HDL cholesterol ratio of 3.8 divided the distribution of LDL phenotypes with 79% (95% confidence interval [CI] 74 to 83) of phenotype B greater than and 81% (95% CI 77 to 85) of phenotype A less than the ratio of 3.8. The ratio was reliable for identifying LDL phenotype B in men and women.     

Serum lipoprotein lipid and apoprotein levels as indicators of the severity of angiographically assessed coronary artery disease

Serum lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides and apoproteins A-I, A-II and B were determined in 71 consecutive male subjects undergoing coronary angiography because of severe angina pectoris. Among the factors studied, apoprotein B, apoprotein B/A-I ratio, VLDL- and LDL cholesterol showed the most consistent association with the severity of coronary artery disease as assessed by angiography whereas serum HDL cholesterol and apoproteins A-I and A-II showed no correlation. Subjects with stenosis of the left main coronary artery had higher serum HDL cholesterol and apoprotein A-I and B levels than the others. In this series which comprised males with severe angina pectoris, derived from a population with high prevalence of coronary heart disease, LDL was the best indicator of the severity of coronary artery disease.     

Association between Lp-PLA2 and coronary artery disease: focus on its relationship with lipoproteins and markers of inflammation and hemostasis

Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) generates pro-inflammatory molecules from oxidized LDL. We examined the association between Lp-PLA2 plasma concentrations and risk of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) in a large case-control study and further assessed the relationship between Lp-PLA2 and various lipid, inflammatory and hemostatic parameters. Lp-PLA2 concentrations were measured in 312 patients with CAD and in 479 age- and gender-matched blood donors. Various sensitive inflammatory and hemostatic markers and a complete lipoprotein profile were obtained. Lp-PLA2 concentrations were significantly higher in cases than in controls (296.1 ng/mL versus 266.0 ng/mL, p<0.0001). In multivariable logistic regression, the age- and gender-adjusted OR for the presence of CAD was 1.61 (95% CI, 1.07-2.44) if the top quartile of the Lp-PLA2 distribution was compared to the bottom quartile. Adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors and statin use resulted in an OR of 2.04 (95% CI, 1.19-3.48). After additional controlling for vWF, the OR was slightly attenuated but still remained statistically significant (OR 1.91; 95% CI, 1.12-3.28). Thus, elevated Lp-PLA2 concentrations were associated with the presence of stable CAD, independent of various biochemical markers. Our results support the hypothesis that Lp-PLA2 may be a novel, independent risk marker for CAD.     

Influence of plasma triglycerides on lipoprotein patterns in normal subjects and in patients with coronary artery disease

This study examined the correlation of plasma triglyceride levels with concentrations of intermediate, low and high density lipoproteins (IDL, LDL, and HDL, respectively) and to particle sizes of LDL in 93 normal men and 106 men with coronary artery disease. Plasma triglyceride concentrations were in the normal range for all persons in both groups. Analysis of lipoproteins of density less than 1.063 g/ml was carried out by analytical ultracentrifugation. The analytical pattern gave the peak Sf for LDL as well as an indication of heterogeneity of particle sizes in the density range of LDL. In both normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease, a positive correlation was found between peak Sf for LDL and concentrations of plasma triglycerides. Plasma triglyceride levels also were correlated positively with concentrations of Sf 20 to 60 lipoproteins and total IDL mass, and inversely with HDL cholesterol levels. Furthermore, the value for peak Sf for LDL correlated inversely with the IDL mass concentration and IDL/LDL mass ratio, and positively with the HDL cholesterol levels. The results indicate that the lipoprotein pattern, including lipoprotein concentrations and particle sizes, is sensitive to concentrations of plasma triglycerides even when the latter are within the normal range.     

Predictive value for coronary heart disease of baseline high-density and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol among Fredrickson type IIa subjects in the Helsinki Heart Study

In the Helsinki Heart Study 2,590 subjects (63.5% of total) had a type IIa hyperlipoproteinemia at screening. Baseline low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (mean 193 mg/dl; 5 mmol/liter) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (mean 50.2 mg/dl; 1.3 mmol/liter) showed no statistical correlation (r = 0.046). Both the placebo (1,293 patients) and gemfibrozil groups (1,297 patients) were divided into tertiles by baseline HDL and LDL cholesterol to determine the relative predictive risk of developing coronary artery disease. In a population with elevated LDL cholesterol, it is significant that the lipoprotein fraction with the greatest predictive value was HDL cholesterol. The severity of LDL cholesterol elevation did not provide any differential predictive value for coronary artery disease.     

Relation of coronary calcium progression and control of lipids according to National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines

Tracking of coronary artery calcium (CAC) has been suggested for monitoring the effects of lipid control, but it is not known whether lipid control decreases progression of CAC. Seven hundred sixty-one subjects (mean age 64.5 +/- 7.3 years; 91% men; 69% positive for CAC) in an ongoing cohort study underwent baseline and follow-up (after 7.0 +/- 0.5 years) computed tomography for CAC. Subjects were stratified into low-risk (<2 risk factors), intermediate-risk (> or =2 risk factors but <20% risk of coronary heart disease over 10 years), or high-risk (> or =2 risk factors and >20% risk of coronary heart disease in 10 years or diabetes) groups. Lipid control was defined according to criteria of the National Cholesterol Education Program. Two-way analysis of covariance was used to examine the relation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and risk group to change in CAC volume score. Control of levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and triglycerides was also examined in relation to progression of CAC. After adjustment for other risk factors and baseline CAC volume, CAC progression was similar between those with adequate and those with inadequate control of LDL cholesterol (p = 0.68) and across categories of optimal, intermediate, and higher risk LDL cholesterol (p = 0.40). However, higher levels of HDL cholesterol (> or =1.5 mmol/L [60 mg/dl]) were associated with less progression of CAC volume (151 vs 203 mm(3) in those with HDL cholesterol <1.0 mmol/L [40 mg/dl], p = 0.03). There was no relation between triglycerides and CAC progression (p = 0.54). Our findings do not support the use of CAC assessment for monitoring the control of LDL cholesterol, but greater progression of CAC may occur in those in whom HDL cholesterol is not controlled.     

Ergonovine-Induced Changes of Coronary Artery Diameter in Patients with Nonsignificant Coronary Artery Stenosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Serum cholesterol is positively associated with the risk of developing coronary heart disease. The aim of this study was to determine the relation between response of coronary arteries to ergonovine provocation and lipid profile in patients with nonsignificant coronary artery disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 105 patients (46 male, 59 female, mean age 52 +/- 8 years) with chest pain syndrome and nonsignificant coronary artery stenosis (< 50% diameter stenosis) were analyzed. Ergonovine test was performed at the end of diagnostic catheterization. Coronary spasm was defined as total or near total obstruction of the coronary artery. By quantitative coronary arteriography, changes of minimal luminal diameter (MLD) during ergonovine provocation were evaluated. Total cholesterol, LDL and HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides were measured. RESULTS: There was a significant negative correlation between resting MLD and LDL cholesterol (r = -0.215; p = 0.034), and a significant positive correlation between MLD decrease provoked by ergonovine and total cholesterol (r = 0.275; p = 0.006), as well as LDL cholesterol (r = 0.284; p = 0.004), but not for HDL cholesterol and triglycerides (p = NS [not significant]). CONCLUSION: In patients with nonsignificant coronary artery stenosis evaluated by ergonovine provocation, there was not only a significant negative correlation between MLD and LDL cholesterol, but also a positive correlation between coronary vasoconstriction induced by ergonovine provocation and both total and LDL cholesterol.