共查询到3条相似文献，搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
Background
In September 2014, the PARADIGM-HF trial showed the heart failure drug combination sacubitril/valsartan to be superior to enalapril for patients with a reduced ejection fraction.Objectives
To determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril in the Netherlands using the clinical data from the PARADIGM-HF trial.Methods
To compare sacubitril/valsartan and enalapril in a cost-effectiveness study, a Markov model was developed using the effectiveness data from the PARADIGM-HF trial. A health care payer’s perspective was applied in the economic evaluation. The developed model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness for sacubitril/valsartan at different per diem prices.Results
The base-case analysis showed that sacubitril/valsartan can be cost-effective at maximum daily costs of €5.50 and €14.14 considering willingness-to-pay thresholds of €20,000 and €50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), respectively. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the model, identifying only the price of sacubitril/valsartan and the mortality within the sacubitril/valsartan group as significant drivers of the cost-effectiveness ratio. Sacubitril/valsartan was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000 per QALY (€50,000 per QALY) in more than 80% of the replications with certainty at the price point of €3 (€10).Conclusions
Sacubitril/valsartan can be considered a cost-effective treatment at a daily price of €5.25. Unless priced lower than enalapril (<€0.045 per day), sacubitril/valsartan is very unlikely to be cost-saving/dominant. 相似文献2.
任艳 《中国卫生标准管理》2022,(3):85-89
目的 围绕老年射血分数下降的心力衰竭(heart failure with decreased ejection fraction in the elderly,HFrEF)患者,采用沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗,评定其应用效果及对不良心血管事件发生率所产生的影响.方法 基于特定时间(2020年1—12月)及固定范围内(本院),... 相似文献