Long‐term respiratory complications of congenital esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula: an update

Despite early surgical repair, congenital esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (EA ± TEF) has long‐term effects on respiratory and gastrointestinal function. This review updates summarizes research published since 2003 on long‐term respiratory complications in patients with a history of EA ± TEF. Pulmonary hypoplasia appears to not be rare in patients with EA ± TEF. Tracheomalacia is common and is associated with respiratory symptoms in childhood. Aspiration, associated with esophageal dysmotility and/or gastroesophageal reflux, may lead to reduced pulmonary function and bronchiectasis. Pulmonary function is generally normal, although lower than in control patients, and restrictive defects tend to be commoner than obstructive defects. Abnormal airway reactivity is common and, along with respiratory symptoms, is associated with atopy. However, the inflammatory profile in EA ± TEF patients based on bronchial biopsies and exhaled nitric oxide differs from typical allergic asthma. Recent studies suggest that in older patients, respiratory symptoms tend to be associated with atopy, but abnormal lung function tends to be associated with gastroesophageal reflux and with chest wall abnormalities. Early detection and management of aspiration may be important to help prevent decrements in pulmonary function and serious long‐term complications in EA ± TEF patients.     

Predictive factors for complications in children with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula

The objective of this study was to describe the incidence of complications in children with esophageal atresia (EA) with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) at a tertiary pediatric hospital and to identify predictive factors for their occurrence. A retrospective chart review of 110 patients born in or transferred to Sydney Children's Hospital with EA/TEF between January 1999 and December 2010 was done. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify predictive factors for the occurrence of complications in these children. From univariate analysis, early esophageal stricture formation was more likely in children with ‘long‐gap’ EA (odds ratio [OR] = 16.32). Patients with early strictures were more likely to develop chest infections (OR = 3.33). Patients with severe tracheomalacia were more likely to experience ‘cyanotic/dying’ (OR = 180) and undergo aortopexy (OR = 549). Patients who had gastroesophageal reflux disease were significantly more likely to require fundoplication (OR = 10.83) and undergo aortopexy (OR = 6.417). From multivariate analysis, ‘long‐gap’ EA was a significant predictive factor for late esophageal stricture formation (P = 0.007) and for gastrostomy insertion (P = 0.001). Reflux was a significant predictive factor for requiring fundoplication (P = 0.007) and gastrostomy (P = 0.002). Gastrostomy insertion (P = 0.000) was a significant predictive factor for undergoing fundoplication. Having a prior fundoplication (P = 0.001) was a significant predictive factor for undergoing a subsequent aortopexy. Predictive factors for the occurrence of complications post EA/TEF repair were identified in this large single centre pediatric study.     

A novel variant of esophageal atresia with tracheo‐esophageal fistula with a crossed‐over proximal esophageal pouch: a diagnostic dilemma

Diagnosis of esophageal atresia (EA) with tracheo‐esophageal fistula (TEF) can be easily done in newborns with symptoms of excessive salivation and failure to pass infant‐feeding tube (IFT) into the stomach. There are many reports in the literature which describe the diagnostic pitfall of this IFT test. We describe a case of a neonate with EA with TEF in which the upper atretic esophageal pouch had grown long enough to reach up to the level of diaphragm, thus allowing the IFT to go up to significant distance from the alveolus giving the radiograph as if the tube is in the upper part of stomach, thus creating a diagnostic dilemma.     

Application of MPVR and TL-VR with 64-row MDCT in neonates with congenital EA and distal TEF

AIM:To assess the application of multiple planar volume reconstruction(MPVR) and three-dimensional (3D) transparency lung volume rendering(TL-VR) with 64-row multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in neonates with congenital esophageal atresia (EA) and distal tracheoesophageal fistula(TEF).METHODS:Twenty neonates(17 boys,3 girls) with EA and distal TEF at a mean age of 4.6 d(range 1-16 d) were enrolled in this study.A helical scan of 64-row MDCT was performed at the 64 mm×0.625 mm collimation.EA and T...     

Long-term complications of congenital esophageal atresia and/or tracheoesophageal fistula

Congenital esophageal atresia (EA) and/or tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) are common congenital anomalies. Respiratory and GI complications occur frequently, and may persist lifelong. Late complications of EA/TEF include tracheomalacia, a recurrence of the TEF, esophageal stricture, and gastroesophageal reflux. These complications may lead to a brassy or honking-type cough, dysphagia, recurrent pneumonia, obstructive and restrictive ventilatory defects, and airway hyperreactivity. Aspiration should be excluded in children and adults with a history of EA/TEF who present with respiratory symptoms and/or recurrent lower respiratory infections, to prevent chronic pulmonary disease.     

Anti‐reflux surgery for patients with esophageal atresia

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is almost constant in esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF). These patients resist medical treatment and require antireflux surgery quite often. The present review examines why this happens, the long‐term consequences of GER and the main indications and results of fundoplication in this particular group of patients. The esophagus of EA/TEF patients is malformed and has abnormal extrinsic and intrinsic innervation and, consequently, deficient sphincter function and dysmotility. These anomalies are permanent. Fifty percent of patients overall have GER, and one‐fifth have Barrett's metaplasia. Close to 100%, GER of pure and long‐gap cases require fundoplication. In the long run, these patients have 50‐fold higher risk of carcinoma than the control population. GER in EA/TEF does not respond well to dietary, antacid, or prokinetic medication. Surgery is necessary in protracted anastomotic stenoses, in pure and long‐gap cases, and when there is an associated duodenal atresia. It should be indicated as well in other symptomatic cases when conservative treatment fails. However, confection of a suitable wrap is anatomically difficult in this condition as shown by a failure rate of 30% that is also explained by the persistence for life of the conditions facilitating GER.     

Treatment outcomes for eosinophilic esophagitis in children with esophageal atresia

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been reported to be more prevalent in patients with esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula (EA‐TEF). To date, there is limited data on the management of EoE in this group of patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the treatment outcomes of EoE in children with EA‐TEF. A retrospective chart review was performed on all EA‐TEF children who were diagnosed with and treated for EoE between January 2000 and September 2013 at the Sydney Children's Hospital. Data collected included details of the patient's treatment, post‐treatment endoscopy, symptoms and nutrition. Twenty patients were included in the study. Median age at diagnosis was 26 months (8–103 months), and median time from diagnosis to last follow‐up was 23 months (2–132 months). Patients were treated with budesonide slurry, swallowed fluticasone, elimination diet alone or in combination. All patients were on proton pump inhibitors at time of diagnosis of EoE which was continued. Six out of seven patients who had furrowing/exudate in endoscopy at diagnosis had complete resolution at a median follow‐up period of 26 months (P = 0.031). Median peak intraepithelial eosinophil count reduced significantly from 30/high‐powered field (HPF) (19–80/HPF) to 8/HPF (0–85/HPF) (median time for improvement = 24 months) (P = 0.015). There was a significant reduction in symptoms of dysphagia and reflux post‐treatment (P < 0.001). Prevalence of strictures significantly decreased (P = 0.016), as did need for dilatations (P = 0.004). In four out of six patients with gastrostomies at baseline, the feeding improved on treatment of EoE and the gastrostomy could be closed. There was also a nonsignificant trend towards improvement in weight and height ‘z scores’ of the patients. Treatment of EoE in children with EA‐TEF was found to significantly reduce intraepithelial eosinophil count, symptoms, strictures and need for dilatations.     

Refractory strictures post‐esophageal atresia repair: what are the alternatives?

Esophageal strictures remain the most frequent complication after esophageal atresia (EA) repair despite refinements in operative techniques. With an incidence of anastomotic stricture between 8% and 49%, EA is the most frequent cause of benign esophageal stricture in children. The mainstay of treatment for esophageal stricture is dilatation with a 58–96% success rate. In order to relieve dysphagia, between 1 and 15 dilatations will be required in each EA patient with an esophageal stricture. However dilatations may lead to complications including perforation (0.1–0.4% of all esophageal benign strictures) and sociopsychological morbidity. Fifty percent of EA strictures will improve in 6 months. However, 30% will persist and require repeat dilatations. The present article explores the variety of non‐surgical alternative treatments for anastomotic strictures after EA repair, focusing on triamcinolone acetonide, mitomycin C and esophageal stents. We propose an algorithm for a more standardized therapeutic approach, with the hope that an international panel of experts could meet and establish a consensus.     

Esophageal atresia: a critical review of management at a single center in Algeria

The purpose was to study the outcomes and factors affecting the survival of esophageal atresia in our center. A retrospective analysis of 86 cases of esophageal atresia (EA) over a 10‐year period was performed with 46 boys and 42 girls. Demographic data, birth weight, gestational age, consanguinity, incidence of associated anomalies, place of delivery, history of feeding, and outcomes were studied. EA with distal tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) was the commonest type with 58/86 (67%). The percentage of patients with at least one associated anomaly was 52/86 (60%), with 7/86 (8%) who are from consanguineous parents; most commonly associated anomalies were cardiac 13/86 (15%). The average gestational age and birth weight were 36 ± 2 weeks and 2300 ± 570 g, respectively. Survival rates for the patients according to the Waterston classification was 80% in group A, 58% in group B, and 25% in group C (three patients died before surgery). Prematurity, the gap between the two ends of the esophagus, and preoperative respiratory status were the most significant factors affecting the survival. Late complication of EA/TEF include respiratory symptoms, especially in the first year, associating tracheomalacia and bronchopulmonary infections in about 24/45 (53%), recurrence of TEF 3/45 (7%), esophageal stricture 26/45 (58%), and gastroesophageal reflux 22/45 (49%). The high incidence of delayed diagnosis, low birth weight, and lack of advanced neonatological management are important contributory factors to the poor outcome. The frequency of late complications highlights the need for multidisciplinary clinics to follow these children's.     

Esophageal motility in an adult with a congenital H-type tracheoesophageal fistula

Congenital H-type tracheoesophageal fistulas (TEF) are rare. Long-standing respiratory symptoms are the most common presenting complaints. Patients with these fistulas have a congenital esophageal motor abnormality characterized by uncoordinated, low-amplitude peristalsis of the esophagal body; both low and normal lower esophageal sphincter pressures have been described. These findings persist despite fistula repair. A case history of an adult patient with congenital TEF is presented and the literature is reviewed. This patient is unusual in that esophageal symptoms (dysphagia) were more prominent than the usual respiratory symptoms.     

Comparison of environmental risk factors for esophageal atresia,anorectal malformations,and the combined phenotype in 263 German families

Esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) and anorectal malformations (ARM) represent the severe ends of the fore‐ and hindgut malformation spectra. Previous research suggests that environmental factors are implicated in their etiology. These risk factors might indicate the influence of specific etiological mechanisms on distinct developmental processes (e.g. fore‐ vs. hindgut malformation). The present study compared environmental factors in patients with isolated EA/TEF, isolated ARM, and the combined phenotype during the periconceptional period and the first trimester of pregnancy in order to investigate the hypothesis that fore‐ and hindgut malformations involve differing environmental factors. Patients with isolated EA/TEF (n = 98), isolated ARM (n = 123), and the combined phenotype (n = 42) were included. Families were recruited within the context of two German multicenter studies of the genetic and environmental causes of EA/TEF (great consortium) and ARM (CURE‐Net). Exposures of interest were ascertained using an epidemiological questionnaire. Chi‐square, Fisher's exact, and Mann–Whitney U‐tests were used to assess differences between the three phenotypes. Newborns with isolated EA/TEF and the combined phenotype had significantly lower birth weights than newborns with isolated ARM (P = 0.001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Mothers of isolated EA/TEF consumed more alcohol periconceptional (80%) than mothers of isolated ARM or the combined phenotype (each 67%). Parental smoking (P = 0.003) and artificial reproductive techniques (P = 0.03) were associated with isolated ARM. Unexpectedly, maternal periconceptional multivitamin supplementation was most frequent among patients with the most severe form of disorder, i.e. the combined phenotype (19%). Significant differences in birth weight were apparent between the three phenotype groups. This might be attributable to the limited ability of EA/TEF fetuses to swallow amniotic fluid, thus depriving them of its nutritive properties. Furthermore, the present data suggest that fore‐ and hindgut malformations involve differing environmental factors. Maternal periconceptional multivitamin supplementation was highest among patients with the combined phenotype. This latter finding is contrary to expectation, and warrants further analysis in large prospective epidemiological studies.     

Long‐gap esophageal atresia: traction‐growth and anastomosis – before and beyond

Long‐gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) is still a major surgical challenge. Options for esophageal reconstruction include the use of native esophagus or esophageal replacement with stomach, colon, or small intestine. Nonetheless, there is a consensus among most pediatric surgeons that the preservation of the native esophagus is associated with better postoperative outcomes. Thus, every effort should be made to conserve the native esophagus. The present study is aimed at critically reporting our experience focused on a standardized protocol based on the preoperative assessment of the gap in all cases and reviewing the present literature because no consensus is available regarding many aspects of LGEA (from definition to treatment). All newborn infants treated since 1995 for esophageal atresia (EA), regardless of type, were included in the present study. Identification of LGEA patients (gap ≥3 vertebral bodies) was performed based on preoperative esophageal gap measurement. The selected patients were grouped based on EA type (A/B vs. C/D) and whether they were referred from an outside institution or not. Postoperative outcome was compared. Statistical analysis was performed with the Fisher's exact test and Mann–Whitney test as appropriate, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Two hundred and nineteen patients have been consecutively treated between 1995 and 2012 with the following EA subtypes: type: A 25 (11.4%); B 6 (2.7%); C 182 (83.1%); D 3 (1.4%); E 3 (1.4%). Fifty‐seven patients (26%) were classified as LGEA: type A‐B, 31 (54.4%); type C‐D, 26 (45.6%). Twenty seven (47%) of these patients were referred after at least one failed attempt at esophageal correction: type A‐B, 15 (55%); type C‐D, 12 (45%). Only one patient ultimately required esophageal substitution, with an overall survival rate of 94%. A standardized perioperative protocol enhances the possibility of preserving the native esophagus in cases of LGEA. Gap measurement can be accurately defined before surgery in all patients with EA. Esophageal anastomosis (either immediate or delayed repair) is almost always feasible; esophageal substitution should only be considered after a rigorous attempt at achieving end‐to‐end esophageal anastomosis.     

Four cancer cases after esophageal atresia repair: Time to start screening the upper gastrointestinal tract

Esophageal atresia(EA) is one of the most common congenital digestive malformations and requires surgical correction early in life. Dedicated centers have reported survival rates up to 95%. The most frequent comorbidities after EA repair are dysphagia(72%) and gastroesophageal reflux(GER)(67%). Chronic GER after EA repair might lead to mucosal damage, esophageal stricturing, Barrett's esophagus and eventually esophageal adenocarcinoma. Several long-term follow-up studies found an increased risk of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal carcinoma in EA patients, both at a relatively young age. Given these findings, the recent ESPGHAN-NASPGHAN guideline recommends routine endoscopy in adults born with EA. We report a series of four EA patients who developed a carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract: three esophageal carcinoma and one colorectal carcinoma in a colonic interposition. These cases emphasize the importance of lifelong screening of the upper gastrointestinal tract in EA patients.     

Congenital esophageal stenosis associated with esophageal atresia

Congenital esophageal stenosis (CES) is a rare clinical condition but is frequently associated with esophageal atresia (EA). The aim of this study is to report the diagnosis, management, and outcome of CES associated with EA. Medical charts of CES‐EA patients from Lille University Hospital, Sainte‐Justine Hospital, and Montreal Children's Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Seventeen patients (13 boys) were included. The incidence of CES in patients with EA was 3.6%. Fifteen patients had a type C EA, one had a type A EA, and one had an isolated tracheoesophageal fistula. Seven patients had associated additional malformations. The mean age at diagnosis was 11.6 months. All but two patients had non‐specific symptoms such as regurgitations or dysphagia. One CES was diagnosed at the time of surgical repair of EA. In 12 patients, CES was suspected based on abnormal barium swallow. In the remaining four, the diagnostic was confirmed by esophagoscopy. Eleven patients were treated by dilation only (1–3 dilations/patient). Six patients underwent surgery (resection and anastomosis) because of failure of attempted dilations (1–7 dilations/patient). Esophageal perforation was encountered in three patients (18%). Three patients had histologically proven tracheobronchial remnants. CES associated with EA is frequent. A high index of suspicion for CES must remain in the presence of EA. Dilatation may be effective to treat some of them, but perforation is frequent. Surgery may be required, especially in CES secondary to ectopic tracheobronchial remnants.     

Evaluation of aortopexy in the management of severe tracheomalacia after esophageal atresia repair

Severe tracheomalacia (TM) is a difficult problem in esophageal atresia (EA) patients. We reviewed our experience with aortopexy and other interventions for severe TM in this population. With review ethics board approval, a retrospective review of TM in postoperative EA patients was conducted (1989–2010). Demographics, perinatal, and surgical information regarding EA repair was collected. TM infants were analyzed for symptomatology, clinical severity, investigations, interventions, and outcomes. Data are presented as proportions or median(range). One hundred and thirty‐two EA patients were reviewed. Most had type C atresia (87.3%), and 18 patients (13.6%) died. Twenty‐five patients (18.9%) had TM of whom five (20%) died. Median symptom onset was 18 days (0–729) after EA repair, with stridor (64%) or retractions/distress (44%) being most frequent. Four and two patients had airway obstruction or cardiorespiratory arrest, respectively. Median time from symptom onset to investigations was 11 days; these were most commonly rigid bronchoscopy (56%) and fluoroscopy (36%). Ten patients (40%) had severe TM on bronchoscopy. Six underwent aortopexy, one fundoplication, and three were treated medically. Length of hospital stay (LOS) post‐aortopexy was 13 days (5–60), and ventilation time was 2 days (0–9). LOS was 60.5 (1–69) days postdiagnosis in non‐aortopexy patients. Readmission rates for respiratory issues were significantly less in the aortopexy (median 0 vs. 5; P = 0.048) group over 2‐year follow up after discharge. Complications of aortopexy included transfusion (1) and temporary diaphragmatic paresis (1), and one mortality secondary to severe congenital cardiac anomalies. Our experience suggests that aortopexy is safe and effective for the treatment of severe TM. It is associated with reduced LOS compared with other treatment strategies and few complications or long‐term sequelae.     

Thoracotomy for repair of esophageal atresia: not as bad as they want you to think!

Is it outdated now to do a thoracotomy to repair esophageal atresia (EA)? Our practices and the literature on the subject of thoracoscopic and open thoracotomy repair of EA were reviewed, seeking answers to the following questions: Is it correct to compare the new thoracoscopic approach for the repair of EA against the thoracotomy techniques of 15–30 years ago? Should post‐thoracotomy scoliosis/thoracic deformity reported in up to 56% of patients be a significant current concern? Are the clips used to close the fistula in thoracoscopic repairs as safe as open suture closures? Is the leak and stricture rate similar with thoracoscopic surgery? Are the anesthesia, period of ventilation, pain, time to first feeding, and the length of hospital stay significantly different with current thoracotomy techniques compared with thoracoscopic methods? Is the cosmetic result of a thoracoscopic repair significantly better? Is the learning curve for EA thoracoscopic repair harming patients for minimal long‐term benefit? These questions were scientifically unanswerable at this time. The limited EA thoracotomies currently performed have a track record of proven safety and minimal morbidity. The results published by surgeons who are pioneers in thoracoscopy may not be generalizable, and the complication rate from teams with less experience is likely underreported. In selected patients and with experienced teams, thoracoscopic EA repair is appropriate. However, EA repair via thoracotomy should, for now, remain as the ‘gold standard’. Further registry‐based, multicenter, comparative studies on EA repair methodologies and outcomes should provide important answers.     

Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula in neonates,first decade's experience

The first thoracoscopic esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (EATEF) repair was performed in March of 2000. This report evaluates the results and evolution of the technique in a single surgeons' experience after the first decade of thoracoscopic EATEF repair. From March 2000 to September 2012, 52 consecutive patients with type 3 EATEF, and an additional nine patients with pure esophageal atresia (EA) were repaired by or under the direct supervision of a single surgeon. Patient weight ranged from 1.2 to 3.8 kg (mean 2.6 kg). Twenty‐two patients had significant associated congenital anomalies. The repairs were performed using three ports. The fistula was ligated using a single endoscopic clip, and the anastomosis was performed using a single layer of interrupted sutures. A transanastomotic tube and chest drain were left in all cases. Fifty‐one of the 52 procedures were completed successfully thoracoscopically. Operative times ranged from 50 to 120 minutes (average 85 minutes). There were three clinical leaks, one in an EATEF and two in patients with long‐gap pure EA, all resolved with conservative therapy. Oral feedings were started on day 5 in all other patients. Twelve of 61 patients required dilations (1–9), and 18 required a Nissen fundoplication for severe reflux. One patient required a thoracoscopic aortopexy for severe tracheomalacia. All patients are currently on full oral feedings. No patient has any evidence of chest wall asymmetry, winged scapula, or clinically significant scoliosis. There have been no recurrent fistulas. Thoracoscopic EA repair has proven to be an effective and safe technique. Initial experience resulted in a higher stricture rate, but this improved with experience and changes in technique. The results are superior to that of documented open series and avoid the morbidity of an open thoracotomy.     

Tracheoesophageal fistula in AIDS: stent versus primary repair

Tracheoesophageal fistula arising secondary to Mycobacterium tuberculous infection in AIDS patients is extremely rare. We describe a case with a fistula lesion that initially failed to close using a four-drug antituberculosis regimen. The original lesion closed following placement of an esophageal stent. However, the stent migrated, causing an iatrogenic tracheoesophageal fistula that needed surgical repair. Tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) is an uncommon clinical condition, most frequently arising as a sequelae to esophageal malignancy. Iatrogenic injury to the membraneous trachea secondary to cuffed endotracheal or tracheostomy tubes in the presence of an in-dwelling nasogastric tube and corrosive burns, accounts for most of the remainder of occurring fistulas. Infections such as candidiasis, syphilis, and tuberculosis are also known to cause this condition. We report stent migration with perforation and subsequent TEF formation in an HIV-positive patient who originally had stent placement for a tuberculous tracheoesophageal fistula.