Differences in response to the aversive properties of ethanol in rats selectively bred for oral ethanol preference

A conditioned taste aversion (CTA) paradigm was used to determine whether aversion to the pharmacological effects of ethanol, apart from orosensory cues, can contribute to genetic differences in voluntary ethanol consumption. Four doses of ethanol, administered IP, were paired with the consumption of a 0.1% saccharin solution in rats from the alcohol-preferring (P) and alcohol-nonpreferring (NP) lines. Repeated pairing of saccharin and ethanol in a dose of 1.0 g/kg produced stronger and more prolonged aversion to saccharin in NP rats, compared with P rats, at comparable blood ethanol levels. A low dose of ethanol (0.25 g/kg) produced transient conditioned facilitation of saccharin consumption in P rats, but not in NP rats, at comparable blood ethanol levels. The results suggest that rats of the NP line find the postingestional effects of high-dose ethanol more aversive, and low-dose ethanol less reinforcing, than do rats of the P line. Genetic differences in voluntary ethanol consumption may be due, in part, to differences in aversion to the postingestional effects of ethanol.     

Moderate doses of ethanol partially reverse avoidance learning deficits in high-alcohol-drinking rats

We previously reported that ethanol-naive high-alcohol-drinking (HAD1 and HAD2) rats exhibited selective deficits in active avoidance learning, as compared to low-alcohol-drinking (LAD1 and LAD2) rats, in a signaled bar-pressing task [Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 24 (2000) 1778]. In the current study, we used appetitive and aversive learning tasks to assess whether administration of ethanol influences approach and avoidance learning in HAD and LAD rats. Rats were administered 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 g ethanol/kg body weight during appetitive and aversive conditioning sessions. We found that ethanol impaired acquisition of the appetitive conditioned response in a dose-dependent manner in both HAD and LAD rats, with 1.5 g/kg ethanol producing the greatest deficits. Notably, moderate doses of ethanol (0.5 and 1.0 g/kg) partially reversed avoidance learning deficits in HAD rats, but only when appetitive conditioning preceded aversive conditioning. The highest dose (1.5 g/kg EtOH) abolished avoidance responding altogether in HAD rats. Avoidance responding in LAD rats was not affected by any dose of ethanol. These results are consistent with previous studies suggesting that alcohol preference may be associated with increased fear or anxiety, but the conditions under which ethanol produces a reduction of fear and anxiety in HAD rats appear to be relatively complex.     

Conditioned taste aversion induced by ethanol in alcohol-preferring rats: influence of the method of ethanol administration.

A recent study of our group has shown that ethanol evokes conditioned place preference (CPP) in Marchigian Sardinian alcohol-preferring (msP) rats following intragastric (IG) administration by means of an indwelling IG catheter, but not following administration by gavage or by intraperitoneal (IP) injection. The present study evaluated in ethanol-naive msP rats the influence of the method of administration (IG injection by indwelling catheter vs. IP injection) on ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA). The dose of 0.35 g/kg of ethanol did not evoke aversion either by IG or by IP administration. Following IG injection, 0.7 g/kg of ethanol, the amount that msP rats voluntarily ingest in a short (2-5 min) drinking episode, did not evoke CTA, and 1.5 g/kg induced a modest CTA. On the other hand, IP injection of 0.7 g/kg of ethanol evoked CTA, and 1.5 g/kg induced a very pronounced CTA. These findings show that the aversive properties of ethanol in msP rats are influenced by the method of administration, and suggest that the IG injection by catheter may reveal more faithfully than the IP injection the motivational properties of amounts of ethanol that alcohol-preferring rats voluntarily ingest.     

Caffeine promotes an ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion: a dose-dependent interaction

The present study examined whether caffeine administered within a dose range previously shown to promote ethanol drinking would also alter an ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA). The results revealed a dose-dependent interaction between caffeine and ethanol where caffeine (2.5 and 10 mg/kg) promoted an ethanol-induced CTA at a low ethanol dose (1.0 g/kg) but had no effect in blocking CTA at the higher ethanol dose (1.5 g/kg). These results were found to be unrelated to an alteration in ethanol metabolism, as caffeine had no effect in altering blood ethanol levels at the doses tested. In agreement with the reward comparison hypothesis, the present results suggest that rather than attenuate ethanol's "aversive" effects, caffeine may have promoted an ethanol-induced CTA by increasing the reinforcing efficacy of ethanol.     

Conditioned taste aversion and alcohol drinking: strain and gender differences

OBJECTIVE: The present study examined the relationship between ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA) and ethanol oral self-administration (OSA) in male and female rats (N = 183) from three related strains not genetically selected for their ethanol preference and differing in their emotional reactivity profile. The strains used were the Wistar Kyoto (WKY), Spontaneously Hypertensive (SHR) and Wistar Kyoto Hyperactive (WKHA). We hypothesized that differences between strains in sensitivity to the aversive properties of alcohol could explain the different propensities to drink alcohol solutions. METHOD: All animals were given three conditioning trials consisting of 20-minute access to saccharin solution followed by saline or ethanol injections (0.5, 1 or 1.5 g/kg, intraperitoneally). Animals subsequently had free access to ethanol OSA for 3 weeks, followed by two CTA trials. RESULTS: Ethanol injections produce a dose-dependent reduction of saccharin consumption in all animals; moreover, the strength of the CTA is gender- and strain-dependent. Taste avoidance induced by ethanol injections disturbed the initiation of ethanol OSA in two strains (WKY and WKHA) but did not change subsequent long-term ethanol consumption in either strain. In addition, voluntary alcohol drinking experience does not attenuate ethanol-induced CTA, and no association was found between ethanol-induced CTA and ethanol OSA. CONCLUSIONS: The data confirm the large variation among strains and between genders in alcohol drinking and taste-aversion learning, but suggest that there is no relationship between the sensitivity to the aversive properties of alcohol and alcohol drinking.     

Effects of SR141716 and WIN 55,212-2 on tolerance to ethanol in rats using the acute and rapid procedures

Rationale Our previous findings have shown rapid cross-tolerance between ethanol and Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol and that intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1R) antagonist SR141716 (SR) does not interfere with tolerance to either of these drugs in mice. Objectives This study investigates the effects of SR, alone or in combination with the CB receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 (WIN), on the development of acute and rapid tolerance to the incoordinating effect of ethanol in rats. Materials and methods Male Wistar rats received SR, through i.p. (0.5–2.0 mg/kg) or intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injections (0.5–4.0 μg), alone or together with WIN (1.0 μg, i.c.v.), in combination with ethanol (2.7 g/kg, i.p.). Another group received WIN (1.0 μg, i.c.v.) in combination with ethanol (2.3 g/kg), and the rats were tested for motor coordination. Rapid tolerance was assessed 24 h later by administering ethanol to all animals and retesting them under the same dose regimen. Acute tolerance was evaluated for 75 min after ethanol (3.0 g/kg, i.p.) in animals treated with SR or WIN (i.c.v.). Results The reduced motor impairment on day 2 (i.e., rapid tolerance) was blocked by SR (i.p. and i.c.v.). WIN (1.0 μg, i.c.v.) facilitated rapid tolerance and also prevented the blockade of rapid tolerance by SR (1.0 μg, i.c.v.). In the acute tolerance procedure, SR did not affect the motor incoordination induced by ethanol. Conclusions The results suggest that the endocannabinoid system may contribute to the development of rapid tolerance to ethanol.     

Effect of low dose ethanol on spontaneous motor activity in alcohol-preferring and -nonpreferring lines of rats

To determine if behavioral arousal may be associated with ethanol preference, the effects of low to moderate doses of ethanol on spontaneous motor activity (SMA) were studied in the selectively bred alcohol-preferring (P) and -nonpreferring (NP) lines of rats as well as in the Maudsley Reactive (MR/N) and Nonreactive (MNR/N) strains. Alcohol-naive rats had food and water available ad lib, but food was removed 24 hr before and during activity testing. After an intraperitoneal injection of saline (5 ml) or ethanol (0.12 to 1.5 g/kg), SMA was monitored every three min for 30 min in an electronic activity monitor. The P and MR/N rats exhibited increased SMA after doses of 0.12 and 0.25 g/kg. Both the NP and MNR/N rats failed to show increased SMA at any ethanol dose. Moderate doses of ethanol, 1.0 and 1.5 g/kg, consistently depressed SMA in all lines/strains. In 24 hr-fasted rats, increased SMA occurred within 6-12 min after injection, but free-fed rats exhibited increased SMA 12-24 min after an ethanol dose of 0.25 g/kg. Free-choice drinking scores (10% ethanol (v/v) versus water) for the P, MR/N, MNR/N and NP rats were 6.6 +/- 0.5, 4.9 +/- 0.8, 2.2 +/- 0.7 and 1.4 +/- 0.3 g ethanol/kg body wt/day (mean +/- SEM), respectively. The data indicate a positive relationship between ethanol preference and ethanol-induced motor stimulation and suggest that hyperactivity may be an expression of the positive reinforcing effect of ethanol for alcohol-preferring rats.     

Brain ethanol concentrations and ethanol discrimination in rats: effects of dose and time

Rationale In drug discrimination procedures, the substitution pattern for ethanol of various receptor ligands is dependent upon ethanol training dose, presumably reflecting functionally different concentrations of ethanol in the brain. The discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol are also time-dependent, although very few studies have investigated the time course of ethanol discriminations. Objectives The present study investigated the relationship between brain ethanol concentrations (BrEC), as measured by intracranial microdialysis of the nucleus accumbens, and the time course of ethanol discriminative effects. Methods Two groups of rats were trained to discriminate either 1.0 or 2.0 g/kg ethanol from water following a 30-min post-ethanol interval. Following training, the time course of the discriminative stimulus was assessed using a series of abbreviated testing trials at 20-min intervals for 5 h after the administration of various ethanol doses (0, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 g/kg). The rats were then fitted with microdialysis probes and the time course of BrECs were determined under conditions similar to the behavioral assessments. Results BrECs were significantly above zero at 4 min post-gavage and attained peak concentrations of 16 mmol/l, 24 mmol/l and 42 mmol/l at 9 min, 16 min and 95 min after IG administration of 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 g/kg ethanol, respectively. BrECs were similar in ethanol-naive and ethanol-trained rats, indicating a lack of pharmacokinetic tolerance under these discrimination procedures. The discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol were dose- and time-dependent, with a threshold concentration of approximately 12 mmol/l achieved at 5 min after 1.0 g/kg ethanol gavage in rats trained to discriminate 1.0 g/kg ethanol. Acute tolerance to the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol was evident from BrECs 2–5 h post-ethanol gavage. Conclusions Ethanol given intragastrically results in a rapid increase in BrEC, independent of ethanol exposure history. The discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol trained at 30 min post-gavage reflect a specific range of BrEC, and depend on the training dose. These data suggest that qualitatively different stimulus effects of ethanol reflect both different ranges of BrEC, as well as within dose acute tolerance to the discriminative stimulus effects.     

Role of acetaldehyde in ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion in rats

Rationale. In spite of many recent studies on the effects of acetaldehyde, it is still unclear whether acetaldehyde mediates the reinforcing and/or aversive effects of ethanol. Objectives. The present study reexamined the role of acetaldehyde in ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA). A first experiment compared ethanol- and acetaldehyde-induced CTA. In a second experiment, cyanamide, an aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitor, was administered before conditioning with either ethanol or acetaldehyde to investigate the effects of acetaldehyde accumulation. Methods. A classic CTA protocol was used to associate the taste of a saccharin solution with either ethanol or acetaldehyde injections. In experiment 1, saccharin consumption was followed by injections of either ethanol (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 or 2.0 g/kg) or acetaldehyde (0, 100, 170 or 300 mg/kg). In experiment 2, the rats were pretreated with either saline or cyanamide (25 mg/kg) before conditioning with either ethanol or acetaldehyde. Results. Both ethanol and acetaldehyde induced significant CTA. However, ethanol produced a very strong CTA relative to acetaldehyde that induced only a weak CTA even at toxic doses. Cyanamide pretreatments significantly potentiated ethanol- but not acetaldehyde-induced CTA. Conclusions. The present results indicate that ethanol-induced CTA does not result from brain acetaldehyde effects. In contrast, it is suggested that the reinforcing effects of brain acetaldehyde might actually reduce ethanol-induced CTA. Our results also suggest that the inhibition of brain catalase activity may contribute to the potentiating effects of cyanamide on ethanol-induced CTA. Electronic Publication     

Chronic ethanol tolerance through free-choice drinking in the P line of alcohol-preferring rats

The objective of this study was to determine if the selectively bred P line of alcohol-preferring rats would develop behavioral (neuronal) tolerance with free-choice drinking of ethanol. Adult, male P rats were divided into four groups. One group (FCE) received food, water and a 10% (v/v) ethanol solution ad lib, while the control group (C) had only food and water. The other two groups received either a liquid diet containing 5% (v/v) ethanol (LDE) or a control liquid diet (LDC). All groups were kept on their respective feeding regimens for 14 days. The mean (+/- SEM) ethanol intakes for the FCE and LDE groups were 6.8 +/- 0.5 and 9.9 +/- 0.4 g ethanol/kg body wt./day, respectively. A shock-motivated jumping task was used to test for tolerance. Each rat received an IP injection of 2.5 g ethanol/kg and was tested every 15 minutes for recovery to a criterion of 75% of the performance level achieved with training. All rats were tested twice, once on the day before beginning their feeding regimens (day 0) and again 14 days later. Tolerance was assessed from differences in time of recovery to criterion performance and in blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) at recovery on day 0 vs. day 14. The mean recovery times for the C, FCE, LDC, and LDE groups on day 0 were 177 +/- 6, 170 +/- 6, 143 +/- 10 and 153 +/- 13 minutes, respectively, and the BACs were 219 +/- 6, 222 +/- 5, 220 +/- 19 and 214 +/- 6 mg%, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Baclofen alters ethanol-stimulated activity but not conditioned place preference or taste aversion in mice.

The present experiments examined the effects of the GABA(B) receptor agonist, baclofen, on the acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) and conditioned taste aversion (CTA) in male DBA/2J mice. Mice in the CPP experiment received four pairings of ethanol (2g/kg) with a distinctive floor stimulus for a 5-min conditioning session (CS+ sessions). On intervening days (CS- sessions), mice received saline injections paired with a different floor type. On CS+ days, mice also received one of four doses of baclofen (0.0. 2.5, 5.0, or 7.5 mg/kg) 15 min before an injection of ethanol. For the preference test, all mice received saline injections, and were placed on a half-grid and half-hole floor for a 60-min session. Baclofen dose dependently reduced ethanol-stimulated activity, but did not alter the magnitude of ethanol-induced CPP at any dose. For the CTA experiment, mice were adapted to a 2-h per day water restriction regimen followed by five conditioning trials every 48 h. During conditioning trials, subjects received an injection of saline or baclofen (2.0 and 6.0 mg/kg) 15 min before injection of 2 g/kg ethanol or saline following 1-h access to a saccharin solution. Baclofen did not alter the magnitude of ethanol-induced CTA at any dose. In addition, baclofen alone did not produce a CTA. Overall, these studies show that activation of GABA(B) receptors with baclofen reduces ethanol-induced locomotor activation, but does not alter ethanol's rewarding or aversive effects in the CPP and CTA paradigms in DBA/2J mice.     

Role of catalase in ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion: a study with 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole

Recent studies involved acetaldehyde, the first ethanol metabolite, in both the rewarding and aversive effects of ethanol consumption. Brain acetaldehyde is believed to originate mainly from local brain metabolism of ethanol by the enzyme catalase. Therefore, the inhibition of catalase by 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (aminotriazole) may help to clarify the involvement of acetaldehyde in ethanol's hedonic effects. In the present study, multiple doses of both ethanol and aminotriazole were used to investigate the effects of catalase inhibition on ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA). A separate microdialysis experiment investigated the effects of aminotriazole pretreatment on the time course of brain ethanol concentrations. Ethanol induced a dose-dependent CTA with a maximal effect after conditioning with 2.0 g/kg ethanol. Aminotriazole pretreatments dose-dependently potentiated the CTA induced by 1.0 g/kg ethanol. However, aminotriazole pretreatments did not alter the CTA induced by higher ethanol doses (1.5 and 2.0 g/kg) probably because a maximal aversion for saccharin was already obtained without aminotriazole. The results of the microdialysis experiment confirmed that the effects of aminotriazole cannot be attributed to local alterations of brain ethanol levels. The present study argues against a role for brain acetaldehyde in ethanol's aversive effects but in favor of its involvement in ethanol rewarding properties.     

Conditioning tastant and the acquisition of conditioned taste avoidance to drugs of abuse in DBA/2J mice

RATIONALE: Conditioned taste aversion (CTA) produced by drugs of abuse such as morphine and cocaine has been interpreted as representing the rewarding actions of these drugs. Evidence for this interpretation is based, in part, on findings in rats indicating saccharin is a more effective conditioning flavor compared to salt (NaCl). However, our studies with ethanol have found salt to be a highly effective conditioning flavor in mice. OBJECTIVES: The present series of studies examined the acquisition of CTA to morphine, ethanol, lithium chloride, and cocaine. Further, saccharin and salt were utilized in each experiment in order to determine effectiveness of each flavor to serve as a conditioning stimulus. METHODS: In four separate experiments, adult male DBA/2J mice were acclimated to a 2 h/day water restriction regimen. Subsequently they received four conditioning trials consisting of 1 h access to either 0.15% w/v saccharin or 0.1 M salt followed by 0, 10 or 20 mg/kg morphine (experiment 1), 0, 2, or 4 g/kg ethanol (experiment 2), 0, 1.5 or 3.0 milliequivalents/kg lithium chloride (experiment 3) or 0, 10 or 20 mg/kg cocaine (experiment 4). A fifth flavor access period (trial 5) was not followed by drug exposure. Following trial 5, each subject received 24-h access to the conditioning flavor and water (two-bottle test 1). Control subjects (0 dose groups from each experiment) received a second two-bottle test with 24-h access to both saccharin and salt flavors. RESULTS: Reduced flavor intake and reduced flavor preference was noted in all drug-paired groups in each experiment. However, more rapid development of CTA was seen with the saccharin flavor in morphine- or cocaine-paired groups. In contrast, ethanol-induced CTA appeared more rapidly with the salt flavor. Lithium-induced CTA was modest, and emerged equally with either flavor. CONCLUSIONS: CTA induced by morphine or cocaine in mice occurs in a similar pattern to that seen in rats, and these findings agree with an interpretation based on drug reward. In contrast, ethanol-induced CTA is more likely attributable to aversive effects.     

Assessment of the aversive and rewarding effects of alcohol in Fischer and Lewis rats

Rationale Application of the Fischer–Lewis genetic model of drug abuse to the study of alcohol’s motivational properties has been limited.Objectives To assess the aversive and rewarding effects of ethanol in Fischer and Lewis rats.Materials and methods Fischer and Lewis rats underwent a four-trial combined conditioned taste aversion/conditioned place preference procedure (CTA/CPP; 0, 1, 1.25, or 1.5 g/kg IP ethanol). Others received 0, 1, or 1.5 g/kg followed by tail blood sampling at 15-, 60- and 180-min post-injection. In additional groups, hypothermia to 0, 1.5, and 3 g/kg was assessed before and 30- and 60-min post-injection.Results All alcohol-treated groups except low-dose Lewis acquired CTA after one trial. Fischer rats developed stronger CTAs than Lewis at 1.25 and 1.5 g/kg. Ethanol-induced reward in taste or place conditioning was not evident in either strain. Lewis animals showed overall higher peak blood alcohol concentrations, but hypothermia did not vary by strain.Conclusion Compared to Fischer, Lewis rats are less sensitive to alcohol’s aversive effects as assessed in the CTA paradigm. The behavioral differences observed are not due to hypothermia, but pharmacokinetic differences may contribute. These data underscore the importance of genetic factors and the aversive effects of initial drug exposures in modeling vulnerability to abuse. In addition to its application with other drugs, the Fischer–Lewis model may be useful for investigating the biobehavioral bases of alcohol abuse.     

Neuropeptide Y administration into the amygdala suppresses ethanol drinking in alcohol-preferring (P) rats following multiple deprivations

The present experiment examines the effects of NPY administered into the amygdala on ethanol drinking by alcohol-preferring P rats following long-term continuous ethanol access, with and without multiple periods of imposed ethanol abstinence. P rats had access to 15% (v/v) ethanol and water for 11 weeks followed by 2 weeks of ethanol abstinence, re-exposure to ethanol for 2 weeks, 2 more weeks of ethanol abstinence, and a final ethanol re-exposure. Immediately prior to the second ethanol re-exposure, 4 groups of rats received bilateral infusions NPY (0.25, 0.5, 1.0 microg) or artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) into the amygdala. Two additional groups were given uninterrupted ethanol access and were infused with a single NPY dose (1.0 microg) or aCSF. The highest NPY dose (1.0 microg) suppressed ethanol intake for 24 h in rats with a history of ethanol abstinence (i.e. deprivation) periods, but had no effect in rats with a history of continuous ethanol access. Water and food intakes were not altered. These results suggest that the amygdala mediates the suppressive effects of centrally administered NPY on ethanol drinking, and that NPY may block relapse-like drinking by opposing the anxiogenic effects of ethanol abstinence.     

Non-specific enhancement of ethanol-induced taste aversion by naloxone

The conditioned taste aversion paradigm (CTA) was used to examine the effects of naloxone on ethanol-induced aversion towards a saccharine solution (3 conditioning and 11 extinction trials). Six groups of rats received conditioning trials consisting of two IP injections after saccharine presentation of different combinations of either ethanol (E: 1.75 g/kg), LiCl (L: 12 mEq/kg, 0.1 M), naloxone (N: 10 mg/kg) or saline (S); S-S, S-N, E-S, E-N, L-S and L-N. Naloxone by itself produced no aversion to the saccharin flavor. Based on the onset and extinction of aversion, naloxone significantly enhanced ethanol but also LiCl-induced CTA. The comparative data argues in favor of different mechanisms of action (1) between the aversive central effects of ethanol and morphine and (2) between ethanol's acute behavioral effects and negatively reinforcing properties. Enhancement of ethanol and LiCl-induced CTA by naloxone is compatible with hypernociceptive action of the opiate-antagonist and with the pain-modulating role of opiates in the CNS.     

Differences in response to the aversive properties and activity effects of low dose ethanol in LAS and HAS selectively bred rats

Rats selectively bred for high alcohol sleep times (HAS) and those that are less affected (LAS) by hypnotic doses (3.0–3.6 g/kg) of ethanol were tested for differential responses to the aversive effects of 1.0 g/kg ethanol in a conditioned place preference task. Likewise, the effects of 0.3–1.0 g/kg ethanol on spontaneous locomotor activity over a 30-min period, as well as the loss of righting reflex with a higher ethanol dose (3.0 g/kg), were determined in these animals. The LAS rats reacted more aversively to 1.0 g/kg during conditioned place aversion testing than the HAS animals and also had a shorter mean sleeping time following 3.0 g/kg ethanol. Furthermore, dose-related depression of spontaneous motor activity was seen in the HAS animals and not in the LAS animals over a 30-min period using doses of 0.3, 0.6, or 1.0 g/kg (10% w/v) ethanol. Taken together, the results indicate that the intoxicating sequelae of high ethanol doses, such as ataxia and sedation, may not be correlated with the aversive effects of low ethanol doses.     

Effects of ethanol on startle responding in alcohol-preferring and -non-preferring rats

The objectives of the present study were to determine (a) if differences exist between the selectively bred alcohol-preferring (P) and -non-preferring (NP) lines of rats in the acoustic startle response (ASR) and prepulse inhibition (PPI), and (b) the effects of ethanol on these measures. Alcohol-na?ve adult female P and NP rats received a single i.p. injection of saline or ethanol (0.25, 0.5, 1. 0, or 1.5 g/kg) and were placed in the startle apparatus 10 min later. After a 5-min acclimation period, rats received five alternating trials of a startle stimulus alone (SSA) (115-dB white noise) or a PPI trial (90-dB white noise preceding a 115-dB white noise). Analysis of the ASR revealed that P rats exhibited higher startle amplitudes than did NP rats with saline injections. The 0. 5-g/kg ethanol dose reduced the startle amplitude in P, but not NP, rats. The 1.0- and 1.5-g/kg ethanol doses nearly abolished the ASR in the NP line, whereas only the highest ethanol dose had this effect in the P line. Vehicle-treated P and NP rats exhibited comparable PPI levels, but only P rats showed a significant disruption (30%) at the 0.50-g/kg ethanol dose. Neither P nor NP rats were affected by ethanol treatment at the 0.25-g/kg dose. Overall, the results suggest that: (a) the difference in baseline ASR may indicate line differences in the neurocircuitry mediating this response, possibly reflecting higher innate levels of emotional reactivity in the P line; (b) the P line may be more sensitive than the NP line to the effects of ethanol in reducing emotional reactivity; and (c) low-dose ethanol may have a greater disruptive effect on sensorimotor gating mechanisms in the P than NP rat.     

The effects of pimozide on drinking behavior in the rat: an investigation using the conditioned taste aversion paradigm

In an attempt to examine the potential aversive properties of the neuroleptic pimozide, a conventional conditioned taste aversion (CTA) paradigm was employed. Rats were either pretreated with pimozide (1.0 mg/kg) before the presentation of a familiar or novel saccharin-flavored solution or tap water or received injections of pimozide after the presentation of a novel saccharin solution. Following this procedure, rats were given a two bottle choice test under drug-free conditions. All pretreated pimozide groups demonstrated a significant unconditioned reduction in fluid intake relative to the vehicle control group. These pimozide groups having different drinking histories did not differ from one another. Although pimozide did not induce a CTA in rats post-treated with this neuroleptic, overall this group drank significantly less saccharin than the control group. Furthermore, on the two bottle choice test, rats which received contingent exposure to pimozide and saccharin (pre and post conditions), did not demonstrate a preference for the saccharin solution. These results suggest that the reduction in fluid intake observed in the pretreated pimozide groups may be due to some unconditioned aversive state induced by the drug. These data indicate that the mechanisms involved in the reduction of fluid intake induced by pimozide may be unrelated to a manipulation of the reinforcing properties of the appetitive stimulus.     

Single administration effects of ethanol on the distribution of white blood cells in rats

Acute single administration effects of ethanol on the distribution of total white blood cells (WBCs), neutrophil, basophil, eosinophil, monocyte and lymphocytes were studied in rats. Acute single administration effects of ethanol on the number of red blood cells (RBCs), hemoglobin concentration and hematocrit were also examined. Male 8-week-old Sprague Dawley rats were randomly divided into the ethanol-administered (ETA) group and the control (CON) group. Two parts of an experiment, 1) 1st experiment : (ethanol dose : 1.0 g/kg body weight), and 2) 2nd experiment : (ethanol dose : 2.0 g/kg body weight) were carried out in rats. The rats were starved to 19:00, and deprived of diet for 12 hr and water for 1 hr before the single administration of ethanol. 1.0 or 2.0 g/kg body weight of ethanol (in 20% (w/w) ethanol) was orally administered to ETA group rats via a stainless stomach tube. In the CON group rats, 0.9% NaCl solution was orally given with the solution volume being equal, in the same manner. Single administration of 1.0 or 2.0 g/kg body weight of ethanol did not change the number of RBCs, hemoglobin concentration and hematocrit. Single administration of 1.0 g/kg body weight of ethanol did not also change the number of WBCs. However, administration of 2.0 g/kg body weight of ethanol increased significantly the number of neutrophil, basophil, monocyte and total WBCs without changing the number of eosinophil and lymphocytes. These results suggest that single administration of 2.0 g/kg body weight of ethanol to rats increased markedly the number of the natural immunity cells without changing the number of acquired cells.