Does a single dose of the phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor,cilomilast (15 mg), induce bronchodilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

Maintenance treatment with PDE(4) inhibitor cilomilast improves FEV(1) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. We investigated the acute bronchodilating effects of a single dose of cilomilast with or without concomitant administration of inhaled salbutamol and/or ipratropium bromide in 21 patients with COPD (mean (SD) age 64 (8.1) y, post-salbutamol FEV(1) 47.7 (13.2) %predicted). FEV(1) was measured before and up to 8 hourly intervals after intake of placebo, cilomilast, or cilomilast in combination with inhaled salbutamol 400 microg and/or ipratropium bromide 80 microg. Maximum increase in FEV(1) from pre-dose baseline was calculated after each treatment and differences between treatment arms were analyzed by ANOVA. The mean (SEM) maximum increase in FEV(1) was 139.6 (18.5) ml following cilomilast and 151.5 (18.5) ml following placebo (95% C.I. for mean difference between cilomilast and placebo: -67.3, 43.6 ml). Furthermore, combined treatment of cilomilast with salbutamol or ipratropium resulted in a maximum increase in FEV(1) of 280.7 (25.6) and 297.0 (25.9) ml, respectively, while this was 379.0 (24.6) ml following cilomilast with both salbutamol and ipratropium (p < 0.01). We conclude that a single dose of cilomilast does not produce acute bronchodilation in patients with COPD who otherwise respond to inhaled bronchodilators. Our results implicate that the change in lung function seen after long-term treatment with cilomilast is not the result of acute bronchodilation in patients with COPD.     

Tolerance to beta 2-agonists in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Eleven patients with severe COPD were examined to determine whether tolerance to beta 2-agonists developed after long-term inhalation therapy with these agents. Before the study all patients were on regular treatment with inhaled salbutamol for six months. At the beginning of the study, response of FEV1 to inhaled salbutamol was measured. Dose-response curves were measured after three weeks of treatment with ipratropium bromide and again after a three-week course of inhaled salbutamol. After ipratropium bromide treatment, responses to low doses of salbutamol tended to be larger than after salbutamol treatment, but differences were not significant. Three hours after the last inhalation of salbutamol the FEV1 was lower on days 1 and 42 than on day 21. We conclude that long-term inhalation therapy with beta 2-agonists in patients with COPD decreases the duration of the bronchodilation produced by the same agents but does not affect the peak response.     

Formoterol: a review of its use in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Inhaled formoterol is a long-acting selective beta2-adrenoceptor agonist, with an onset of action of 5 minutes postdose and a bronchodilator effect that lasts for at least 12 hours. Statistically significant and clinically relevant (>120 ml) improvements in lung function [assessed using standardized/normalized area under the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) versus time curve (AUC FEV1)] were observed with inhaled formoterol 12 microg twice daily (the approved dosage in the US) compared with placebo in 12-week and 12-month, randomized, double-blind trials in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The bronchodilator efficacy of formoterol 12 microg twice daily was greater than that of oral slow-release theophylline (individualized dosages) in a 12-month trial or inhaled ipratropium bromide 40 microg four times daily in a 12-week trial. Improvement in AUC FEV1 with formoterol, but not theophylline, compared with placebo was observed in patients with irreversible or poorly-reversible airflow obstruction. Formoterol also significantly improved health-related quality of life compared with ipratropium bromide or placebo and significantly reduced symptoms compared with placebo. Combination therapy with formoterol 12 microg twice daily plus ipratropium bromide 40 microg four times daily was significantly more effective than albuterol (salbutamol) 200 microg four times daily plus the same dosage of ipratropium bromide in a 3-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover trial. Inhaled formoterol was well tolerated in clinical trials. The incidence of investigator-determined drug-related adverse events with inhaled formoterol 12 microg twice daily was similar to that with placebo and inhaled ipratropium bromide 40 microg four times daily but lower than that with oral slow-release theophylline (individualized dosages). Importantly, there were no significant differences between formoterol and placebo or comparator drugs in cardiovascular adverse events in patients with COPD and corrected QT interval values within the normal range. In conclusion, inhaled formoterol improved lung function and health-related quality of life and reduced symptoms relative to placebo in clinical trials in patients with COPD. The drug had greater bronchodilator efficacy than oral slow-release theophylline or inhaled ipratropium bromide and showed efficacy in combination with ipratropium bromide. The adverse events profile (including cardiovascular adverse events) with formoterol was similar to that with placebo. Thus, inhaled formoterol may be considered as a first-line option for the management of bronchoconstriction in patients with COPD who require regular bronchodilator therapy for the management of symptoms.     

Comparison of the bronchodilating effect of salmeterol and zafirlukast in combination with that of their use as single treatments in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that the effect of a beta2-agonist is additive with that of a cysteinyl leukotriene 1 receptor antagonist. OBJECTIVES: The present study was designed to answer the question of whether combined administration of inhaled salmeterol and oral zafirlukast at the standard doses would result in greater bronchodilation in patients with chronic airway obstruction than the use of either drug alone. METHODS: The study was performed using a double-blind, double-dummy, crossover, randomised design, and was conducted on 4 non-consecutive days. Sixteen patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and 10 non-smoker asthmatic patients received 40 mg of oral zafirlukast, 50 microg of inhaled salmeterol, 50 microg of inhaled salmeterol plus 40 mg of oral zafirlukast of placebo. Lung function was assessed before drug administration and 30, 60, 120, 180 and 240 min thereafter. At the end of the 4-hour period, each patient received 400 microg of inhaled salbutamol and spirometric testing was performed 30 min later. RESULTS: In both asthmatic and COPD patients, the overall effect of salmeterol and zafirlukast on the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was considered extremely significant (p < 0.0001), with a maximum bronchodilation above baseline after 180 min (20.7 and 11.0%, respectively) in asthmatics and after 2 h (21.7 and 11.2%, respectively) in COPD subjects. Zafirlukast did not produce any further significant acute bronchodilation in addition to that achieved with salmeterol alone in either asthmatic or COPD patients. Nevertheless, 7 out of 16 COPD patients and 7 out of 10 asthmatic patients had a further improvement after the combination of salmeterol and zafirlukast. The mean difference in pre- and post-salbutamol FEV1 values in both asthmatic and COPD patients after zafirlukast was significant (p < 0.05), but that after salmeterol and the combination of the two drugs was not significant (p > 0.05). The difference between placebo and zafirlukast was not significant following inhaled salbutamol given 4 h after each treatment. Conclusions: Both salmeterol and zafirlukast induced a significant increase in FEV1, although salmeterol elicited a greater improvement in both asthmatic and COPD patients. Apparently, zafirlukast at the clinically recommended dose did not produce any further significant acute bronchodilation in addition to that achieved with salmeterol alone, either in asthma or COPD. In any case, evaluation of the effect of the combination over a 12-hour period is mandatory.     

The role of domiciliary nebulizers in managing patients with severe COPD

The difficulty of assessing nebulizer responses in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been demonstrated before. This study aims to re-examine both the role of domiciliary nebulizers in COPD and also bronchodilator (BD) assessment in individuals. In a double-blind, randomized, cross-over trial, 19 stable patients with severe COPD were given the following medication 6-hourly for 2-week periods: (1) nebulized salbutamol 2.5 mg with ipratropium 0.5 mg and placebo inhalers (MDI) with spacer; (2) placebo nebules and inhaled salbutamol 400 microg with ipratropium 80 microg via MDI with spacer; (3) inhaled salbutamol 400 microg with ipratropium 80 microg via MDI with spacer (but no placebo nebulized drugs). Both nebulized and MDI drugs produced highly significant improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), specific airways conductance, 6-min walking distance (6MWD) and residual volume. There were no significant differences between BD responses obtained after active nebulized and active MDI BDs. From the diary cards, 2 weeks of active nebulized BDs produced a slightly higher median peak expiratory flow (PEF) than active MDI BDs (236 and 219 l m(-1), respectively, P=0.01) and slightly less extra inhaler use (0.8 and 1.1 puffs, respectively, P<0.05) but no significant difference in dyspnoea or quality of life (QOL) scores. There were significant correlations between domiciliary PEF and acute BD-induced changes in FVC and 6MWD, and also between domiciliary dyspnoea scores and acute changes in both total lung capacity and 6MWD. In conclusion, nebulized medication conferred little clinical advantage over the regular use of inhalers with spacers in this group of patients with severe COPD. However, acute changes in total lung capacity, FVC and 6MWD may be useful predictors of the longer-term effects of nebulized BDs in individual patients.     

A comparison of bronchodilating drugs in the treatment of stable COPD]

The purpose of this study was to establish the optimal bronchodilating drug among therapies currently available for clinical treatment of the stable phase of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The efficacy of ipratropium bromide 40 micrograms, salbutamol 200 micrograms, and ipratropium bromide 40 micrograms plus salbutamol 200 micrograms was compared in 14 patients with COPD. Daily PEFR was obtained during the last seven days of a 2 week period incorporating drug inhalation four times daily. FEV1 and FVC were assessed on the final day of the treatment period. In the absence of bronchodilating medication, FEV1 was 1.27 +/- 0.13 l (52.9 +/- 5.1% pred). With ipratropium bromide 40 micrograms alone, FEV1 was 1.43 +/- 0.13 l (59.8 +/- 5.3% pred). A similar value was obtained for salbutamol 200 micrograms: 1.45 +/- 0.14 l (61.0 +/- 5.4% pred). However, FEV1 following the administration of ipratropium bromide 40 micrograms in combination with salbutamol 200 micrograms was 1.51 +/- 0.13 l (63.6 +/- 5.3% pred). The percent increase in FEV1 (compared to the value obtained without medication) was significantly higher with combined ipratropium bromide 40 micrograms plus salbutamol 200 micrograms (122.2 +/- 3.8%) than with either ipratropium bromide 40 micrograms (114.8 +/- 5.5%) or salbutamol 200 micrograms (116.5 +/- 4.4%) alone. Furthermore, the daily post-dilator PEFR improved significantly more with the combined therapy four times a day (311 +/- 29 l/min) than with either ipratropium bromide 40 micrograms (296 +/- 30 l/min) or salbutamol 200 micrograms (303 +/- 29 l/min) therapy alone. There was no discernible difference between results obtained with ipratropium bromide 40 micrograms versus salbutamol 200 micrograms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

In patients with COPD, treatment with a combination of formoterol and ipratropium is more effective than a combination of salbutamol and ipratropium : a 3-week, randomized, double-blind, within-patient, multicenter study

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of adding formoterol or salbutamol to regular ipratropium bromide treatment in COPD patients whose conditions were suboptimally controlled with ipratropium bromide alone. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, two-period, crossover clinical trial. SETTING: Twenty-four clinics and university medical centers in nine countries. PATIENTS: One hundred seventy-two patients with baseline FEV(1) < or = 65% predicted, with FEV(1) reversibility to salbutamol not exceeding the normal variability of the measurement, and symptomatic despite regular treatment with ipratropium bromide. INTERVENTIONS: Each patient received two treatments in random order: either inhaled formoterol dry powder, 12 microg bid, in addition to ipratropium bromide, 40 microg qid for 3 weeks, followed by salbutamol, 200 microg qid, in addition to ipratropium, 40 microg qid for 3 weeks, or vice versa. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Efficacy end points included morning premedication peak expiratory flow (PEF) during the last week of treatment (primary end point), the area under the curve (AUC) for FEV(1) measured for 6 h after morning dose on the last day of treatment, and symptom scores (from daily diary recordings). Morning PEF and the AUC for FEV(1) were significantly better for formoterol/ipratropium than for salbutamol/ipratropium (p = 0.0003 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The formoterol/ipratropium combination also induced a greater improvement in mean total symptom scores (p = 0.0042). The safety profile of the two treatments was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: In COPD patients requiring combination bronchodilator treatment, the addition of formoterol to regular ipratropium treatment is more effective than the addition of salbutamol.     

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入沙丁胺醇和溴化异丙托品后的肺通气功能改变

目的探讨慢性阻塞性肺疾病（ chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COPD）患者联合吸入沙丁胺醇、溴化异丙托品与单独吸入沙丁胺醇后的肺功能变化差异。方法采用前瞻性方法研究43例COPD患者联合吸药后的肺通气功能变化,回顺性收集180例COPD患者经典支气管舒张试验数据作为对照,比较两组患者的支气管可逆性差异。结果联合吸药组总体和GOLDⅡ级患者吸药30min后支气管舒张试验阳性率为34．9％和43．5％,显著大于单独吸药组总体和GOLDⅡ级患者的阳性率17．2％和18．4％（P〈0．05）。联合吸药组吸药30min后FEV1改善率≥20．0％和〈10．0％的患者比例差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）,分别为37．2％和39．5％．但单独吸药组FEV1改善率≥20．0％和〈10．0％的患者比例差异有统计学意义（P〈0．001）,分别为17．8％和53．9％。两组中FEV1改善率≥20．0％的患者比例差异有统计学意义（Pd0．05）。联合吸药组总体和GOLDⅡ级患者吸药30min后的AFEV1和△FVC显著大于单独吸药组总体和GOLDⅡ级患者吸药后的相应值（P〈0．05）。两组患者的AFEV1与△FVC均呈显著正相关,随COPD严重度增加,其相关性在联合吸药组呈增强趋势,而在单独吸药组呈减弱趋势。结论COPD患者联合吸入沙丁胺醇和溴化异丙托品比单独吸入沙丁胺醇更具有明显的支气管舒张可逆性,并且舒张作用的时效性任联合吸药组更长。     

Quality of life measurements and bronchodilator responsiveness in prescribing nebulizer therapy in COPD

Nebulized bronchodilators are widely regarded as the optimal treatment for maintenance therapy in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of the study was to assess whether detailed physiological, functional and quality of life-related measurements can assist in determining the requirement for nebulized bronchodilator therapy in patients with moderate to severe COPD. This was an unblinded, randomized, crossover study that compared intermediate (120 mcg ipratropium bromide and 600 mcg of salbutamol using metered dose inhaler (MDI) and spacer) and high dose (nebulized 500 mcg ipratropium bromide and 2.5 mg salbutamol) bronchodilator therapy, on physiological, functional and quality of life-related measurements in patients with COPD. A total of 25 patients (12 female), mean (SD) age 68 (7) years, FEV(1) 45 (10) % predicted completed the study. There was no statistically significant difference between the treatments in the pre- and post-bronchodilator lung function values, six-minute walk distance, breathlessness score or quality of life questionnaires. Fifteen patients preferred bronchodilator therapy with nebulizer and 10 with MDI and spacer. In 20 patients at least one positive response in quality of life score, lung function or six-minute walk, was observed on the preferred treatment. Only a proportion of patients with moderate or severe COPD prefer nebulized bronchodilator therapy. This study found that none of the parameters singly or in combination were consistently predictive of patients' preference for nebulized bronchodilator therapy. Therefore, we suggest that clinicians institute a trial of stepping up to an intermediate dose of bronchodilators prior to introducing nebulized therapy.     

Efficacy of nebulized flunisolide combined with salbutamol and ipratropium bromide in stable patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of nebulized corticosteroids in the prevention of exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been poorly studied. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of nebulized flunisolide (1 mg) + salbutamol/ipratropium bromide (1,875/375 microg) b.i.d. in comparison with placebo + salbutamol/ipratropium bromide. METHODS: This was a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind study on 114 patients with COPD of moderate-to-severe degree. The main outcome was the frequency of severe exacerbations over a 6-month period. Before and after treatment, respiratory symptoms, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), shuttle walking test distance and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores were evaluated. RESULTS: The total number of exacerbations was slightly lower in the flunisolide group compared to the placebo group (19 vs. 34, p = 0.054); the number of patients experiencing at least one exacerbation during the study was also decreased (16 vs. 26, p = 0.059). In particular, type 3 Anthonisens's exacerbations were significantly reduced by flunisolide (p = 0.044). In the placebo group, scores were higher than in the flunisolide group but nonsignificant for dyspnea, cough, sputum amount and purulence. FEV(1) was significantly increased compared to baseline in both groups, and the area under the FEV(1)-time curve during the 6-month period was significantly greater in the flunisolide group (5.2 +/- 10.6 vs. 2.1 +/- 5.0, flunisolide vs. placebo, respectively; p = 0.047). For shuttle walking test distance and scores of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, no significant difference between the baseline evaluation and the end of the study was observed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Nebulized flunisolide is a good alternative to other inhaled corticosteroids when added to nebulized salbutamol/ipratropium bromide in the long-term treatment of moderate-to-severe COPD patients.     

Therapeutic equivalence of a fenoterol/ipratropium bromide combination (Berodual) inhaled as a dry powder and by metered dose inhaler in chronic obstructive airway disease.

A randomized double-blind cross-over study was performed to compare the bronchodilator effects of a fenoterol/ipratropium bromide combination (Berodual) when inhaled as a dry powder and by metered dose inhaler (MDI) in an equal doses (fenoterol 100 micrograms + ipratropium bromide 40 micrograms). Thirty-eight patients (29 male, 9 female, mean age 53 years) with reversible chronic obstructive airway disease were studied on 2 separate days by employing the double-dummy technique. The effects of the two modes of administration of the fixed combination were followed by pulmonary function tests [forced expiratory volume (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC)] from 15 min up to 6 h after administration. In addition, the pulse rate was recorded just before each pulmonary function test. The FEV1 and FVC time-response curves showed that the dry powder had an overall efficacy profile similar to MDI. Both formulations produced clinically significant improvements in FEV1 in approximately 10 min. Peak effects occurred in 1 h while at 6 h after test drug inhalation there was still an increase in FEV1 of 14%. No safety problems were observed after the use of the test drugs and no clinically significant changes in pulse rate were found. It is concluded that the dry powder of the fenoterol/ipratropium bromide combination provided effective bronchodilation of similar degree and duration to that achieved with the MDI. It would appear, therefore, to be a valuable alternative to MDI.     

A comparison of the effects of salbutamol and ipratropium bromide on exercise endurance in patients with COPD

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Inhaled bronchodilators are the first-line pharmacotherapy against COPD. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of beta(2)-agonists and anticholinergic agents on the exercise capacity of patients with COPD. METHODS: A total of 67 stable patients with COPD were recruited at the Kyoto University Hospital. After inhaling 400 micro g salbutamol, 80 micro g ipratropium bromide, or an identical placebo in a randomized, double-blind, crossover fashion, the patients performed cycle endurance tests at a constant workload of 80% of the maximum work rate reached on progressive cycle ergometry, and the endurance time was recorded. RESULTS: Both salbutamol and ipratropium bromide significantly improved the endurance time by 29 s (15%; p < 0.001) and 27 s (14%; p < 0.001), respectively, in comparison with the placebo. However, there was no statistically significant difference between them (p = 0.71). The dyspnea ratios were also similarly reduced by both bronchodilators. The difference in the endurance time between therapy with salbutamol and placebo was significantly, but moderately, related to the difference between therapy with ipratropium bromide and placebo. In addition, there were no relationships, or only weakly significant relationships, between the change in FEV(1) and the change in the endurance time, the highest oxygen uptake, and the highest minute ventilation for both salbutamol and ipratropium bromide. CONCLUSIONS: Therapy with both salbutamol and ipratropium bromide improved exercise capacity, as evaluated by the endurance time, and reduced dyspnea similarly in patients with COPD. In addition, the effects of the different bronchodilators on exercise capacity varied within individuals, and a complex mechanism may be responsible for the different effects of these two bronchodilators on exercise capacity vs airflow limitation. These results support the conclusion that both types of inhaled bronchodilators can be used as first-line drugs for the treatment of stable patients with COPD.     

Long-term treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with salmeterol and the additive effect of ipratropium.

The efficacy and safety of salmeterol alone was compared with the combination of salmeterol plus ipratropium and with placebo during long-term treatment in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In addition, the single-dose effect in response to the first dose of treatment was studied over 12 h. The patients (n=144; age 64+/-7 yrs, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 44+/-11% pred) participated in a three-centre double-blind double-placebo parallel group study and were randomized after a run-in period of 2 weeks to receive either salmeterol 50 microg b.i.d., salmeterol 5 microg b.i.d. plus ipratropium 40 microg q.i.d. or placebo for a period of 12 weeks. The single-dose study demonstrated that salmeterol produced a significant increase in FEV1 (peak of 7% pred) and specific airway conductance (sGaw) (maximum of 60% baseline) for > or =12 h. The combination of salmeterol plus ipratropium elicited a greater bronchodilator response (11% and 94% increases respectively) than salmeterol alone during the first 6 h after inhalation. During treatment there were significant improvements in daytime symptom scores and morning peak expiratory flow in both the salmeterol and the salmeterol plus ipratropium groups (p<0.001), with an associated decrease in the use of rescue salbutamol. Improvements in FEV1 and sGaw were greater in the salmeterol plus ipratropium group than in the patients receiving only salmeterol. Thirty-five patients had an exacerbation; 11 (23%) in the salmeterol group (versus placebo NS), six (13%) in the salmeterol plus ipratropium group (versus placebo p<0.01) and 18 (36%) in the placebo group. In conclusion, in patients with severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, long-term treatment with either salmeterol alone or salmeterol plus ipratropium is safe and effective. There was added benefit from the combination therapy in terms of improvement in airways obstruction, but not for improvement in symptom control or need for rescue salbutamol.     

Effect of salbutamol, ipratropium bromide and cromolyn sodium on prostaglandin F2 alpha-induced bronchospasm

We studied the effects of salbutamol, ipratropium bromide and cromolyn sodium on PGF2 alpha-induced bronchospasm in ten patients with asthma. Initially, the bronchial reactivity to IC-PGF2 alpha and the DP20-PGF2 alpha were determined. Recalculations were made two days later and again 1 h after administration of various drugs given on different days. Salbutamol and ipratropium bromide induced significant bronchodilation and of similar magnitude 1 h after administration. On the day salbutamol was given, surface area under the dose-response curve to PGF2 alpha was significantly higher and the final drop of FEV1 significantly lower than those observed on days when placebo, ipratropium bromide and cromolyn sodium were given. No differences among these values were found for placebo, ipratropium bromide and cromolyn sodium. Thus, beta 2 stimulants attenuate significantly PGF2 alpha-induced bronchospasm, while ipratropium bromide and cromolyn sodium do not have protective effect.     

Improved delivery of ipratropium bromide/fenoterol from Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler in patients with COPD

We performed a multicentre, randomised, double-blind (within-device), placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide plus fenoterol hydrobromide (IB/FEN; Berodual) delivered via the novel, propellant-free Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) and from a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-metered-dose inhaler (MDI) in moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. After 2-weeks' run-in (CFC-MDI [IB 20 microg/FEN 50 microg per actuation] two actuations q.i.d. [MDI 40/100]), 892 patients were randomised to Respimat SMI containing IB 10 microg/FEN 25 microg (Respimat SMI 10/25), IB 20 microg/FEN 50 microg (Respimat SMI 20/50) or placebo (one actuation q.i.d.), or a CFC-MDI containing IB 20 microg/FEN 50 microg (MDI 40/100) or placebo (two actuations q.i.d.) for 12 weeks. Analysis of the primary endpoint (change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1] in the first 60 min after dosing [area under the curve; AUC0-1h]) on day 85 showed that the efficacy of Respimat SMI 20/50 (but not Respimat SMI 10/25) was not inferior to that of MDI 40/100. The safety profile of Respimat SMI was comparable to CFC-MDI. Switching from MDI 40/100 to Respimat SMI was well tolerated. Respimat SMI enables a 50% reduction of the nominal inhaled dose of IB/FEN in COPD patients while offering similar therapeutic efficacy and safety to the CFC-MDI.     

Effects of salbutamol and ipratropium bromide on arterial blood gases in patients with stable COPD

The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute effects of inhaled salbutamol and ipratropium bromide on arterial blood gases in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We measured arterial blood gases and spirometry after inhalation of salbutamol (200 micro g) or ipratropium bromide (36 micro g) in 25 patients with COPD. After at least 2 days of washout period, the same patients inhaled the other drug, and the procedure of study was repeated. Blood specimens were taken just before the inhalation and at 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 90,120 minutes after inhalation, and spirometry was done before and 60 minutes after inhalation. Both drugs caused a small decrease in PaO(2) levels, however the decrease in PaO(2) after inhalation of salbutamol was significantly higher than that after ipratropium (p< 0.05). Both drugs caused a little, but not statistically significant decrease in D(A-a)DO(2) and PaCO(2) (p> 0.05). There were a little increase in FEV1 and FVC at 60 minutes after inhalation of both drugs, especially with salbutamol, compared to ipratropium bromide; but both increases were statistically insignificant (p> 0.05). The results revealed that, salbutamol caused a significant, but small and transient decrease in PaO2 and a little, but insignificant increase in D(A-a)DO(2) when used in recommended doses. Although salbutamol and ipratropium bromide which are used in treatment of COPD, can cause small decreases in PaO(2) after inhalation, the declines are trancient and clinically insignificant.     

Lung function improvement in smokers suffering from COPD with zafirlukast, a CysLT(1)-receptor antagonist

The present study was designed to evaluate the bronchodilating role of zafirlukast, a CysLT(1)receptor antagonist, at the standard dosage currently recommended in the marketing of this agent in smokers with COPD. The study was performed using a double-blind, cross-over, randomized design and was conducted on 2 non-consecutive days. Sixteen outpatients suffering from stable COPD received 40 mg oral zafirlukast, or placebo. Lung function was controlled before drug administration and 30, 60, 120, 180, 240 min thereafter. At the end of the 4-h period, each patient received 400 microg inhaled salbutamol and spirometric testing was performed 30 min later. Zafirlukast, but not placebo, produced a significant (P<0.05) bronchodilation between 30 min and 4 h following administration, with a maximum mean increase in FEV(1)of 0.134 l (11.2%) above baseline after 2 h. Nine of 16 patients showed an increase in FEV(1)of at least 15% above baseline after zafirlukast. The maximum mean increase in FEV(1)after zafirlukast in these subjects, who were considered responders, observed after 2 h, was 0.221 (19.4%). The mean difference of post-salbutamol FEV(1)values after zafirlukast and placebo (-0.036 l) was not significant (P<0.05). In responders, the mean of differences in pre- and post-salbutamol FEV(1)values after zafirlukast was 0.077 l, whereas the mean of differences between post-salbutamol values after zafirlukast and those after placebo was -0.064 l. The mean AUC(0-4 h)for all patients was 0.121 l for placebo and 0.385 l for zafirlukast. The difference between the placebo and zafirlukast AUC(0-4 h)was significant (P<0.05). The individual FEV(1)AUC(0-4 h)after zafirlukast were higher than those after placebo in 12 out of 16 patients. These findings suggest that cysteinyl leukotrienes might be one of the causes of persistent bronchoconstriction in COPD, at least in several smokers, but do not confirm the hypothesis that the effects of zafirlukast and salbutamol are independent and additive.     

Ipratropium bromide hydrofluoroalkane inhalation aerosol is safe and effective in patients with COPD

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide reformulated with the chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free propellant hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)-134a (ipratropium bromide HFA) to that of the marketed ipratropium bromide inhalation aerosol (containing CFC) in patients with COPD. DESIGN: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. The primary efficacy parameter was acute bronchodilator response. The primary end points were peak change in FEV(1) from baseline and area under the response-time curve. SETTING: Thirty-one clinical centers in the United States participated in this project. PATIENTS: A total of 507 patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomized, and 444 patients completed the trial. INTERVENTIONS: Twelve weeks of treatment four times daily with one of the following: ipratropium bromide HFA, 42 microg; ipratropium bromide HFA, 84 microg; HFA placebo; ipratropium bromide inhalation aerosol, 42 microg; or CFC placebo. Measurements and results: Patients in all active treatment groups had significant bronchodilator responses as shown by increases in mean FEV(1) from baseline of at least 15%. Bronchodilator response in all active treatment groups was also significantly more than their respective placebo treatments based on FEV(1), area under the time-response curve from 0 to 6 h, and peak response. FVC results were similar to those seen with FEV(1). There were no significant differences in adverse events, laboratory findings, or ECG findings among the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ipratropium bromide HFA, 42 and mgr;g, provided bronchodilation comparable to the marketed ipratropium bromide CFC, 42 and mgr;g, over 12 weeks of regular use.     

Comparison of domiciliary nebulized salbutamol and salbutamol from a metered-dose inhaler in stable chronic airflow limitation

Nineteen patients (12 men) mean age, 63.4 years (range, 32 to 78), with stable chronic airflow limitation, mean FEV, 0.55 L (range, 0.3 to 1.05 L), completed an eight-week, double-blind, double cross-over study comparing nebulized salbutamol and salbutamol from a metered-dose inhaler (MDI). Salbutamol from both delivery systems produced bronchodilation. The doses of salbutamol inhaled via the nebulizer and MDI producing maximal bronchodilation were established by cumulative dose-response curves. The contents of the nebulizer and MDI were inhaled four times a day, one system containing salbutamol and the other a placebo. Cross-over of salbutamol from one system to the other occurred every two weeks. There was no significant difference between the two delivery methods in daily peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), severity of symptoms, or extra bronchodilator usage. Two weekly laboratory assessments of spirometry, PEFR, and exercise tolerance also showed no significant differences. Careful assessment is recommended before the provision of domiciliary nebulizers.     

Glycopyrrolate causes prolonged bronchoprotection and bronchodilatation in patients with asthma

INTRODUCTION: Inhaled anticholinergic drugs are effective bronchodilators in the treatment of COPD, and tiotropium bromide has recently been introduced as a once-daily bronchodilator for use as a maintenance treatment. Racemic glycopyrrolate is an anticholinergic drug that has been used orally to control gastric acidity, parenterally as an antisialogogue and to reverse neuromuscular blockade, and has been studied by inhalation for asthma and COPD. DESIGN AND OBJECTIVE: We investigated the duration of protection against the constrictor effects of inhaled methacholine of a single dose of inhaled nebulized racemic glycopyrrolate (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg) compared with ipratropium bromide (0.5 mg) and placebo in 10 atopic asthmatic volunteers in a double-blind, five-way, crossover study. RESULTS: Protection against methacholine-induced bronchospasm after administering glycopyrrolate was maintained to 30 h, the last time point measured. Both bronchodilatation and bronchoprotection were significantly longer with glycopyrrolate than after ipratropium bromide, and bronchoprotection was significant at all time points from 2 to 30 h compared to placebo. Dryness of the mouth and nose was described in 18% of patients after the highest dose of glycopyrrolate. CONCLUSIONS: The prolonged bronchodilator response and the protection against methacholine-induced bronchospasm demonstrated in asthma suggests that inhaled racemic glycopyrrolate would be superior to ipratropium bromide for treatment of stable COPD.