单孔胸腔镜在肺癌外科中的应用进展

微创手术治疗是目前胸外科发展的趋势,以电视胸腔镜手术为代表的胸部微创手术已替代传统开胸术成为肺癌最主要的手术方式,具有手术创伤小、术后疼痛程度轻、并发症发病率低等特点,术后随访也显示电视胸腔镜手术肺癌切除术在患者术后远期生存率上不逊色于传统开胸术式.随着胸腔镜技术及器械的发展,微创手术的适应范围几乎已经涵盖了所有的肺癌切除术式,成为了肺癌切除手术的主流.传统多孔电视胸腔镜手术的手术方式已经日臻完善和统一,许多胸外科术者也在不断尝试新的微创术式,争取更小的手术创伤,在这种背景下,单孔电视胸腔镜手术应运而生,越来越多的胸外科术者开始采用该术式.由于只需一个切口,单孔电视胸腔镜手术在在术后切口疼痛方面有明显优势,并且在手术效果方面和多孔电视胸腔镜手术VATS和传统开胸术式相仿.本文将简要的总结近几年来单孔电视胸腔镜手术的发展和最新进展.     

单孔胸腔镜手术联合中心静脉导管引流与单操作孔胸腔镜手术治疗自发性气胸的对比分析

目的 探讨自发性气胸采用单孔胸腔镜手术联合中心静脉导管引流与单操作孔胸腔镜手术治疗的效果。方法 回顾性分析66例于2016年1月至2016年8月期间我院施行单孔胸腔镜联合中心静脉导管引流或单操作孔胸腔镜手术治疗原发性自发性气胸的患者,分为单孔导引组（n=21）和单操作孔组（n=45）,观察两组治疗效果。结果 单孔导引组术后胸管留置时间、术后疼痛与单操作孔组比较有明显差异性（P<0.05）;两组术中出血量、手术时间和术后复发率比较无明显差异（P>0.05）。结论 两种手术方式均安全、有效。单孔胸腔镜手术联合中心静脉导管引流治疗自发性气胸法创伤小、疼痛轻。     

The Feasibility and Advantages of Subxiphoid Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Pulmonary Lobectomy

Background

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy has emerged as a promising and exciting approach for minimally invasive thoracic surgeries. However, nearly all reported uniportal VATS lobectomies are performed via an intercostal route, and chest wall trauma remains an issue. Here, we report the use of a novel uniportal VATS technique involving a subxiphoid route for pulmonary lobectomies.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed perioperative data for patients who underwent subxiphoid uniportal and traditional three-port VATS lobectomies from January 2016 to January 2017 at our hospital.

Results

During the study period, 37 patients successively underwent subxiphoid uniportal VATS lobectomies, including three synchronous bilateral pulmonectomies; 68 patients underwent traditional three-port VATS. There were no surgical or 30-day postoperative mortalities, and no significant between-group differences were found in the number of retrieved lymph nodes, number of explored nodal stations, blood loss, drainage time, postoperative complications, or length of hospital stay. Operative time was longer in the subxiphoid uniportal VATS group than in the traditional three-port VATS group (P < 0.001). Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores after surgery were significantly lower in the subxiphoid uniportal VATS group (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Subxiphoid uniportal VATS lobectomy is a safe and feasible surgical procedure associated with reduced surgical trauma and postoperative pain as well as improved cosmetic results compared with traditional VATS. Moreover, this procedure is better suited for patients receiving synchronous bilateral pulmonectomy. Further long-term follow-up analyses involving more patients are ongoing.

Trial registry number

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03051438.

     

Efficacy of uniportal video assisted thoracoscopic surgery in management of primary spontaneous hemopneumothorax

IntroductionPrimary spontaneous hemopneumothorax (PSHP) is an accumulation of blood and air in the pleural space without trauma or obvious etiology. It is a rare surgical emergency and may lead to hypovolemic shock if not treated. Early and fast recognition will improve patient outcomes.Presentation of the caseWe present a case of PSHP in a young male utilizing the uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) through the same incisional site of the thoracostomy tube. The patient made an uneventful recovery.DiscussionVATS has become the first line and the gold standard surgical management of most thoracic surgeries. In case of PSHP, some thoracic surgeons still skeptical about the minimal invasive approach in such emergency. Applying the concept of uniportal technique, which can be used for diagnostic as well as major therapeutic purposes. There is vast literature that support the notion that it reduces postoperative pain and paresthesia and lead to fast patient recovery.ConclusionAs demonstrated in our case, uniportal VATS is safe and effective in the management of PSHP.     

Selective lobar collapse for video-assisted thoracic surgery

BACKGROUND: Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is conventionally performed under single-lung ventilation. A small proportion of patients are often excluded from undergoing VATS because of their inability to tolerate single-lung ventilation. We describe a simple technique of selective lobar lung collapse that may help to recruit additional, selected patients for VATS. METHODS: We use a standard suction catheter placed under bronchoscopic guidance to the target lobar bronchus through a single-lumen endotracheal tube. The catheter is left open to air, or suction can be applied to facilitate lobar collapse. The remaining lobe of the same lung can be ventilated throughout surgery. Surgery is performed using standard VATS techniques. RESULTS: Using this technique we have successfully performed VATS on 63 chest sides in 35 patients. The procedures performed included thoracodorsal sympathectomies (n = 28), mechanical pleurodesis procedures (n = 3), mediastinal and pleural biopsies (n = 2), and lung wedge resections (n = 2). We encountered no mortality or morbidity in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: This technique is simple and safe and requires no expensive disposable devices. Although not essential for most patients undergoing VATS, it deserves to be in the armamentarium of the thoracic surgeon. Further studies will be required to better define its application in clinical practice.     

Bilateral staged uniportal VATS for synchronous lung cancers

We report a case of bilateral staged uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) pulmonary resections for synchronous early stage squamous cell carcinoma in a patient with limited respiratory reserve. Wide wedge resections and lymph nodes sampling were performed. Postoperative respiratory function and pain scores were unaffected by the bilateral operations. Uniportal VATS proved to be a feasible alternative to more traditional procedures (three portal VATS or minithoracotomy) in case lesser resections are required for compromised respiratory function and may contribute to increase operability in high-risk patients.     

Uniportal versus Multiportal Thoracoscopic Complex Segmentectomy: Propensity Matching Analysis

Purpose: Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) complex segmentectomy has been challenging for thoracic surgeons. This study was designed to compare the perioperative outcomes between uniportal and multiportal VATS complex segmentectomy.Methods: Data on a total of 122 uniportal and 57 multiportal VATS complex segmentectomies were assessed. Propensity score (PS) matching yielded 56 patients in each group. A crude comparison and PS matching analyses, incorporating preoperative variables, were conducted to elucidate the short-term outcomes between uniportal and multiportal VATS complex segmentectomies.Results: The uniportal group had a significantly shorter operation time (173 min vs. 195 min, p = 0.004), pleural drainage duration (2.5 d vs. 3.5 d, p <0.001), and postoperative hospital stay (4.2 d vs. 5.3 d, p <0.001) before matching, and a significant difference was also observed after matching for pleural drainage duration (2.5 d vs. 3.6 d, p <0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (4.5 d vs. 5.2 d, p = 0.001). The numbers of dissected lymph nodes in N1 and N2 stations, the intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were not significantly different between these two groups.Conclusions: The uniportal VATS complex segmentectomy was not inferior to multiportal VATS in terms of perioperative outcomes and therefore should be considered as a viable surgical approach for treatment.     

基层医院如何开展胸腔镜手术及手术成本控制对策

目的探讨如何在基层医院开展电视胸腔镜手术及手术成本控制对策。方法利用自制器械对308例患者行电视胸腔镜手术,通过改进技术、制定不同术式的方法控制手术成本。结果 308例患者中34例胸腔镜辅助小切口,4例中转开胸,共10例出现围手术期并发症,发生率为3.42%,无死亡病例。结论通过自制器械,制定合理的学习曲线,加强手术成本控制,手术费用明显降低,使基层不发达地区患者也能共享微创技术带来的福音。     

Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: clinical and economic analysis in comparison to the traditional approach

We aimed to verify the clinical and economic effects of uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) compared to traditional three-port VATS technique. We analyzed 51 consecutive patients (23 three-port VATS and 28 uni-port VATS), treated by bullectomy and pleural abrasion, to detect differences between the two groups with regard to intraoperative management, postoperative course, pain, paraesthesia and costs. Data about pain and paraesthesia were collected by telephonic interview within a minimum follow-up period of six months. Compared to three-port VATS, patients treated by the uni-port VATS were discharged more quickly (3.8 days vs. 4.9 days, P=0.03) and experienced paraesthesia less frequently (35% vs. 94%, P<0.0001). No difference in chronic pain was observed between the two groups (numeric pain score: 0.6 uni-port vs. 1.3 three-port, P=0.2). Compared to three-port VATS, we found a significant reduction in postoperative costs for the patients operated on by the uni-port technique (euro1407 vs. euro1793, P=0.03), without any increase in surgical costs. In conclusion, uniportal VATS appears to offer better clinical (postoperative stay and rate of paraesthesia) and economic (postoperative costs) results than the standard three-port VATS for treating primary spontaneous pneumothorax.     

Uniportal and three-portal video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: analysis of the Italian video-assisted thoracic surgery group database

Open in a separate window OBJECTIVESThis study compares the uniportal with the 3-portal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) by examining the data collected in the Italian VATS Group Database. The primary end point was early postoperative pain; secondary end points were intraoperative and postoperative complications, surgical time, number of dissected lymph nodes and length of stay.METHODSThis was an observational, retrospective, cohort, multicentre study on data collected by 49 Italian thoracic units. Inclusion criteria were clinical stage I–II non-small-cell lung cancer, uniportal or 3-portal VATS lobectomy and R0 resection. Exclusion criteria were cT3 disease, previous thoracic malignancy, induction therapy, significant comorbidities and conversion to other techniques. The pain parameter was dichotomized: the numeric rating scale ≤3 described mild pain, whereas the numeric rating scale score >3 described moderate/severe pain. The propensity score-adjusted generalized estimating equation was used to compare the uniportal with 3-portal lobectomy.RESULTSAmong 4338 patients enrolled from January 2014 to July 2017, 1980 met the inclusion criteria; 1808 patients underwent 3-portal lobectomy and 172 uniportal surgery. The adjusted generalized estimating equation regression model using the propensity score showed that over time pain decreased in both groups (P < 0.001). There was a statistical difference on the second and third postoperative days; odds ratio (OR) 2.28 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.62–3.21; P < 0.001] and OR 2.58 (95% CI 1.74–3.83; P < 0.001), respectively. The uniportal-VATS group had higher operative time (P < 0.001), shorter chest drain permanence (P < 0.001) and shorter length of stay (P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSData from the Italian VATS Group Database showed that in clinical practice uniportal lobectomy seems to entail a higher risk of moderate/severe pain on second and third postoperative days.     

Limited operation of lung cancer: the role of video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer

Lobectomy with systemic nodal dissection is recognized as a standard operation for lung cancer. Partial resection and segmental resection are classified as limited resections for lung cancer to preserve pulmonary function. Minor complications occur more frequently with limited resection than with lobectomy. Partial resection of the lung and simple lobectomy can be performed as video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Systemic hilar and mediastinal lymph node dissection is not yet standardized using VATS. On the other hand, VATS preserves chest wall muscles. The difference between standard thoracotomy and VATS is a difference of approach to the thoracic cavity. It is most important for lung cancer surgery to be performed in the thoracic cavity with the minimum burden on patients.     

Video-assisted thoracic surgery--state of the art

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is one of the main medical revolutions of the past decade. For its satisfactory performance, the following prerequisites are essential: (1) knowledge and experience in thoracic surgery; (2) team of experienced anesthesiologists; (3) preoperative assessment of respiratory function; (4) adequate postoperative care; and (5) instruments specially designed for thoracoscopic surgery. VATS is routinely performed under general anesthesia with double lumen endotracheal intubation for separate control of each lung. Insufflation of carbon dioxide must not exceed 1-3 mm Hg. Too high pressure may cause harmful reduction of venous return and mediastinal shift with impairment of ventilation. Presence of adhesions should be determined by finger exploration of the pleural cavity. Operative ports should be placed carefully, avoiding damage to the intercostal nerves and vessels. The video technique can be used with efficiency for the following indications: pneumothorax, resection of pulmonary nodules, biopsies of lung, pleura and mediastinal structures, resection of mediastinal tumors, management of empyema, and hemostasis and closure of lacerations after trauma. Indications for esophageal procedures include esophagomyotomy for achalasia and resections of benign lesions. Repair of perforated esophagus is a matter of controversy, but in early stages it can be done thoracoscopically. Although video-pericardioscopy has been performed by some surgeons, this procedure can be done easier and faster using the direct approach without the video equipment. There are differences of opinion with regard to major pulmonary and esophageal resections for cancer. The apparent advantage of diminished pain is offset by inadequate resection, spread of malignant cells and potential damage to the resected specimen with loss of important information concerning pathology. Complications of VATS are few, and include prolonged air leak, dysrhythmia, respiratory failure, bleeding and infection. Due to progress over the past several years, VATS has become an inseparable part of thoracic surgery and should be included in the basic training of every thoracic surgeon.     

Fast-track video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: future challenges

Objectives To provide a short overview of fast-track video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and to identify areas requiring further research. Design A literature search was made using key words including: fast-track, enhanced recovery, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS), robotic, thoracotomy, single-incision, uniportal, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), chest tube, air-leak, digital drainage, pain management, analgesia, perioperative management, anaesthesia and non-intubated. References from articles were screened for further articles. Using abstracts, areas of interest for developing a fast-track protocol were selected. Results The minimally invasive approach can be divided into several surgical methods that need further research to establish superiority. The role of intubation has to be further examined as well as the role of chest drains. Multimodal analgesic treatment including preoperative methylprednisolone seems promising and requires further research. Conclusions The fast-track data from other procedures may support future development and improvement of fast-track VATS.     

Uniportal vs standard three-port VATS technique for spontaneous pneumothorax: comparison of post-operative pain and residual paraesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: VATS using the conventional three ports is currently the technique of choice for blebectomy/bullectomy for spontaneous pneumothorax. However, the procedure has recently been shown to have neurological complications related to the port sites. Uniportal VATS has recently been proposed as an alternative to conventional three-port VATS. It is anticipated that the single incision will predispose to a lower incidence of neurological complications. METHODS: We report our initial single surgeon experience of uniportal VATS (n = 16) and provide a comparison of post-operative pain and residual paraesthesia to conventional three-port procedures (n = 19) for the same pathology. RESULTS: In both groups, the pneumothorax pathology was principally primary. There was no difference between the groups in terms of age, spirometry, tissue resected, drainage time and inpatient stay. A difference was, however, noted in inpatient pain scores. The uniportal group had a lower median score of 0.4 (visual analogue range 0-4) while the three-port technique reported 0.8 (P = 0.06, Mann-Whitney test). The maximum score trend was similar (1.4 vs. 2.6, respectively, P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney test). Follow-up for uniportal and three-port VATS averaged 9.4+/-6.6 and 32.1+/-9.9 months, respectively. One patient in the three-port group had a pneumothorax recurrence. Three-port VATS also had a higher residual pain score (0.5) compared to uniportal VATS (0.3). Of clinical significance was the incidence of neurological complications. Eighty-six percent of uniportal patients reported no symptoms. The remaining experienced only mild 'numbness' or 'swelling'. However, in the three-port group, only 42% reported no symptoms. A similar number experienced 'numbness'. Two females described sexual dysfunction due to altered breast sensitivity. Seventeen percent (2/12) reported 'pins and needles'. CONCLUSIONS: Uniportal VATS appears to be tolerable, safe and efficient in treating spontaneous pneumothorax in our series. Moreover, post-operative pain and paraesthesia incidence was lower than three-port VATS. Prospective randomised trials are important to evaluate this technique.     

Pediatric robotic surgery: A single-institutional review of the first 100 consecutive cases

Background Robotic surgery is a new technology which may expand the variety of operations a surgeon can perform with minimally invasive techniques. We present a retrospective review of our first 100 consecutive robotic cases in children. Methods A three-arm robot was used with one camera arm and two instrument arms. Additional accessory ports were utilized as necessary. Two different attending surgeons performed the procedures. Results Twenty-four different types of procedures were completed using the robot. The majority of the procedures (89%) were abdominal procedures with 11% thoracic. No urology or cardiac procedures were performed. Age ranged from 1 day to 23 years with an average age of 8.4 years. Weight ranged from 2.2 to 103 kg with a median weight of 27.9 kg. Twenty-two patients were less than 10.0 kg. Examples of cases included gastrointestinal (GI) surgery, hepatobiliary, surgical oncology, and congenital anomalies. The overall majority of cases had never been performed minimally invasively by the authors. The overall intraoperative conversion rate to open surgery was 13%. One case (1%) was converted to thoracoscopic because of lack of domain for the articulating instruments. No conversions or complications occurred as a result of injuries from the robotic instruments. Interestingly, four abdominal cases were converted to open surgery due to equipment failures or injuries from standard laparoscopic instruments used through non-robotic accessory ports. Conclusions Robotic surgery is safe and effective in children. An enormous variety of cases can be safely performed including complex cases in neonates and small children. Simple operations such as cholecystectomies have minimal advantages by using robotic technology but can serve as excellent teaching tools for residents and newcomers to this form of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The technology is ideal for complex hepatobiliary cases and thoracic surgery, particularly solid chest masses. This paper has been accepted for presentation at the SAGES meeting in Las Vegas, NV April 16^th–22^nd, 2007. (SEND-07-0145)     

Endovascular repair of aortic lesions associated to video-assisted thoracoscopy surgery after chest trauma

AIM: Trauma of the thoracic aorta for blunt trauma shows a very high incidence of mortality. Hospital mortality rate after aortic open surgery is between 15% and 30%. Endovascular management represents an alternative treatment Associated lesions are usually seen in those critical patients. Hemothorax may be present. The authors propose a combined treatment of endovascular repair for the aortic lesion and video-assisted thoracoscopy surgery (VATS) for the treatment of chest bleeding complications. METHODS: The authors report a series of three patients with post-traumatic aortic lesion and hemothorax. In two patients endovascular procedure was first performed, followed by VATS, few days later, for retained hemothorax. In the third patient the two procedures were performed at the same time because of the patient's critical conditions. RESULTS: There was technical success of stent-graft placement in all the treated cases. No postoperative mortality. No postoperative paraplegia. No VATS converted to thoracotomy. The postoperative follow-up time range between 10 and 19 months. CONCLUSION: Considering the relatively short procedural time and minimally invasive approach of both techniques, the concomitant use of them may represent an alternative to standard open surgery in cases of thoracic aorta lesions associated with hemothorax. Those procedures may be performed sequentially or together in emergency cases with intra-thoracic more active bleeding to exclude or to treat intra thoracic bleeding.     

Video-assisted thoracic lobectomy with bronchoplasty for lung cancer, with special reference to methodology

Few studies have described video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) to bronchoplasty with pulmonary resection. Here, we report the successful implementation of VATS bronchoplasty, as determined retrospectively. Between 2005 and 2010, 362 patients underwent elective lung resection for malignant or benign lung tumors. Of these patients, VATS lobectomy with bronchoplasty was performed in seven patients (four men, three women; median age, 72.9 years). The medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Of the seven patients, six had primary lung cancer (PLC), and one had metastatic cancer of the lung. The surgical procedures were lobectomy with wedge bronchoplasty. The patients with PLC also underwent mediastinal or hilar lymph node dissection. The median total operating time was 230 min, and the median blood loss was 152 ml. The median postoperative hospital stay was seven days, without major postoperative complications. The most important feature of the described method is that the surgeon mainly observes the operative field directly, through a working wound; the surgical team observes via a monitor. An advantage for the surgeon is the ability to use the same instruments in VATS as are used in conventional thoracotomy, as well as the same suturing techniques in vascular reconstruction, especially involving the pulmonary artery.     

Video assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) Thymectomy-a better alternative

Background With the introduction of video imaging technique in late 1980s the field of thoracoscopy was expanded into video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in 1990. VATS has several unique advantages like reducing repiratory complications, hospital stay and post operative pain due to avoidance of thoracotomy/sternotomy. It is indicated in almost all thoracic surgical procedures-both diagnostic and therapeutic. VATS thymectomy is being practised more and more replacing conventional thymectomy with thoracotomy/sternotomy. Methods From 2000 to 2003 we have performed 22 cases of VATS thymectomy in Myesthenia Gravis. Surgery was performed in supine decubitus under General anaesthesia with Double Lumen E T Tube for epsilateral Lung Collapse. Three ports were made on the right chest at 2nd space parasternal, 4th space anterior axillary line and at 5th space just below the nipple. At the end of the procedure a chest drain was introduced through the lowest port. Results Out of 22 patients 12 were females and 10 males. Median age was 36 years (Range 16 years to 64 years). Median operating time was 2 hours and drainage was 200 ml. Median ventillation time was 6 hours. Median hospital stay was five days. There was no mortality and no major complications. Conclusion VATS thymectomy is a suitable alternative to conventional thymectomy with thoracotomy/sternotomy. Results are comparable. VATS is now developing into an exciting adjunct in thoracic surgery. The morbidity associated with this procedure is extremely low. VATS has become an essential component of all thoracic surgical units and more and more thoracic surgical dieases will be managed with this minimally invasive technique in future.     

Novel retractor for lymph node dissection by video-assisted thoracic surgery

In nonrandomized studies, the video-assisted thoracic surgical (VATS) lobectomy seems to be a safe and effective procedure for treatment of lung cancer. However, there are some difficulties in VATS complete mediastinal lymph node dissection. The presence of the lymph node deep in the mediastinal space necessitates retraction of the surrounding organs. Therefore, we developed a retractor to create enough working space during the VATS procedure. To dissect lymph nodes, we use endoscopic bipolar forceps. These instruments are connected to a special electrosurgical generator to apply bipolar soft coagulation, which enables simultaneous dissection and sealing. Thus, "en bloc" lymph node dissection can be performed during the VATS procedure.