Complete Avoidance of Calcineurin Inhibitors in Renal Transplantation: A Randomized Trial Comparing Sirolimus and Tacrolimus

Calcineurin inhibitors have decreased acute rejection and improved early renal allograft survival, but their use has been implicated in the development of chronic nephrotoxicity. We performed a prospective, randomized trial in kidney transplantation comparing sirolimus-MMF-prednisone to tacrolimus-MMF-prednisone. Eighty-one patients in the sirolimus group and 84 patients in the tacrolimus group were enrolled (mean follow-up = 33 months; range 13-47 months). At 1 year, patient survival was similar in the groups (98% with sirolimus, 96% with tacrolimus; p = 0.42) as was graft survival (94% sirolimus vs. 92% tacrolimus, p = 0.95). The incidence of clinical acute rejection was 10% in the tacrolimus group and 13% in the sirolimus group (p = 0.58). There was no difference in mean GFR measured by iothalamate clearance between the tacrolimus and sirolimus groups at 1 year (61 +/- 19 mL/min vs. 63 +/- 18 mL/min, p = 0.57) or 2 years (61 +/- 17 mL/min vs. 61 +/- 19 mL/min, p = 0.84). At 1 year, chronicity using the Banff schema showed no difference in interstitial, tubular or glomerular changes, but fewer chronic vascular changes in the sirolimus group. This study shows that a CNI-free regimen using sirolimus-MMF-prednisone produces similar acute rejection rates, graft survival and renal function 1-2 years after transplantation compared to tacrolimus-MMF-prednisone.     

Renal Function in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients Receiving Different Prolonged‐Release Tacrolimus Regimens—The DIAMOND Study

DIAMOND: multicenter, 24‐week, randomized trial investigating the effect of different once‐daily, prolonged‐release tacrolimus dosing regimens on renal function after de novo liver transplantation. Arm 1: prolonged‐release tacrolimus (initial dose 0.2mg/kg/day); Arm 2: prolonged‐release tacrolimus (0.15–0.175mg/kg/day) plus basiliximab; Arm 3: prolonged‐release tacrolimus (0.2mg/kg/day delayed until Day 5) plus basiliximab. All patients received MMF plus a bolus of corticosteroid (no maintenance steroids). Primary endpoint: eGFR (MDRD4) at Week 24. Secondary endpoints: composite efficacy failure, BCAR and AEs. Baseline characteristics were comparable. Tacrolimus trough levels were readily achieved posttransplant; initially lower in Arm 2 versus 1 with delayed initiation in Arm 3. eGFR (MDRD4) was higher in Arms 2 and 3 versus 1 (p = 0.001, p = 0.047). Kaplan–Meier estimates of composite efficacy failure‐free survival were 72.0%, 77.6%, 73.9% in Arms 1–3. BCAR incidence was significantly lower in Arm 2 versus 1 and 3 (p = 0.016, p = 0.039). AEs were comparable. Prolonged‐release tacrolimus (0.15–0.175mg/kg/day) immediately posttransplant plus basiliximab and MMF (without maintenance corticosteroids) was associated with lower tacrolimus exposure, and significantly reduced renal function impairment and BCAR incidence versus prolonged‐release tacrolimus (0.2mg/kg/day) administered immediately posttransplant. Delayed higher‐dose prolonged‐release tacrolimus initiation significantly reduced renal function impairment compared with immediate posttransplant administration, but BCAR incidence was comparable.     

The ORION Study: Comparison of Two Sirolimus‐Based Regimens versus Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Renal Allograft Recipients

Safety and efficacy of two sirolimus (SRL)‐based regimens were compared with tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Renal transplantation recipients were randomized to Group 1 (SRL+TAC; week 13 TAC elimination [n = 152]), Group 2 (SRL + MMF [n = 152]) or Group 3 (TAC + MMF [n = 139]). Group 2, with higher‐than‐expected biopsy‐confirmed acute rejections (BCARs), was sponsor‐terminated; therefore, Group 2 two‐year data were limited. At 1 and 2 years, respectively, graft (Group 1: 92.8%, 88.5%; Group 2: 90.6%, 89.9%; Group 3: 96.2%, 95.4%) and patient (Group 1: 97.3%, 94.4%; Group 2: 95.2%, 94.5%; Group 3: 97.0%, 97.0%) survival rates were similar. One‐ and 2‐year BCAR incidence was: Group 1, 15.2%, 17.4%; Group 2, 31.3%, 32.8%; Group 3, 8.2%, 12.3% (Group 2 vs. 3, p < 0.001). Mean 1‐ and 2‐year modified intent‐to‐treat glomerular filtration rates (mL/min) were similar. Primary reason for discontinuation was adverse events (Group 1, 34.2%; Group 2, 33.6%; Group 3, 22.3%; p < 0.05). In Groups 1 and 2, delayed wound healing and hyperlipidemia were more frequent. One‐year post hoc analysis of new‐onset diabetes posttransplantation was greater in TAC recipients (Groups 1 and 3 vs. 2, 17% vs. 6%; p = 0.004). Between‐group malignancy rates were similar. The SRL‐based regimens were not associated with improved outcomes for kidney transplantation patients.     

Observations regarding the use of sirolimus and tacrolimus in high-risk cadaveric renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Balancing the risk of acute rejection (AR) with drug-induced toxicities complicates the selection of the optimal immunosuppressive regimen, especially in the high-risk renal transplant recipient. This study was designed to determine the optimal dosage combinations of tacrolimus and sirolimus in a high-risk cadaveric renal transplant population. METHODS: Primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients were randomly assigned to receive either standard tacrolimus (trough levels of 10-15 ng/mL) plus reduced sirolimus (trough levels of 5-10 ng,mL) (Group I) or to receive reduced tacrolimus (trough levels of 5-10 ng,mL) plus standard sirolimus (trough levels of 10-15 ng/mL) (Group II). All patients received Thymoglobulin induction and steroids. RESULTS: Thirty-nine (16 in Group I and 23 in Group II) high-risk renal transplant recipients (100% cadaveric donors, 79% African-American recipients, and 59% delayed graft function) are the subjects of this report. At 6 months, the patient survival rate was 94 and 100% and the graft survival rate was 94 and 83% in Groups I and II, respectively. The incidence of biopsy-proven AR was 6 and 5% in Groups I and II, respectively. Eight patients (50%) in Group I required discontinuation of tacrolimus, seven because of biopsy-proven tacrolimus nephrotoxicity and one secondarily to interstitial pneumonitis. Wound complications were the most frequent adverse event reported in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus was associated with a low risk of AR in this cohort of high-risk renal transplant recipients. However, 50% of patients who received standard tacrolimus and reduced sirolimus combination had to be discontinued from the regimen because of biopsy-proven nephrotoxicity. These preliminary results provide evidence that sirolimus should not be added to tacrolimus without dosage adjustments. We have discontinued recruitment of patients to the standard tacrolimus and reduced sirolimus combination and we have tightened our criteria for selection of marginal donor kidneys with our high-risk renal transplant recipients.     

Efficacy of Prolonged- and Immediate-release Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation: A Pooled Analysis of Two Large,Randomized, Controlled Trials

Background

Two large, prospective studies (12-03; OSAKA) compared the efficacy and tolerability of prolonged-release versus immediate-release tacrolimus in kidney transplant patients also receiving mycophenolate mofetil and low-dose corticosteroids (without induction therapy).

Efficacy and Toxicity of a Protocol Using Sirolimus, Tacrolimus and Daclizumab in a Nonhuman Primate Renal Allotransplant Model

A regimen combining sirolimus, tacrolimus, and daclizumab has recently been shown to provide adequate immunosuppression for allogeneic islet transplantation in humans, but remains unproven for primarily vascularized allografts. We evaluated this regimen for renal allograft transplantation in mismatched nonhuman primates. Dosages of sirolimus and tacrolimus were adjusted for trough levels of 10-15 ng/mL and 4-6 ng/mL, respectively. Treated monkeys (n = 5) had significantly prolonged allograft survival, with a mean survival of 36 days vs. 7 days in untreated controls (n = 6, p = 0.008). Four of five treated animals, but none of the controls, developed fibrinoid vascular necrosis of the small intestine. A review of gut histology from animals on other immunosuppressive protocols performed by our laboratory suggested that these lesions were a result of sirolimus exposure. In summary, this regimen prolongs the survival of vascularized renal allografts, but is limited by profound GI toxicity in rhesus macaques.     

A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus and sirolimus versus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (NEORAL) and sirolimus in renal transplantation. I. Drug interactions and rejection at one year

BACKGROUND: To reduce long-term nephrotoxic calcineurin inhibitor dosage, adjunctive sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was used in a 150-patient, randomized, three-armed trial in cadaveric or human leukocyte antigen non-identical living-donor first renal transplant recipients (n=50/group). METHODS: Group A received tacrolimus and sirolimus. Target tacrolimus trough levels postoperatively were 10, 8, and 6 ng/mL at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year, respectively. Group B received tacrolimus and MMF. Target tacrolimus trough levels were 10 and 8 ng/mL at 1 month and 1 year, with a targeted dose of MMF of 1 g twice daily. Group C received cyclosporine A (CsA) (Neoral, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) and sirolimus with target CsA trough levels of 225 and 175 ng/mL at 1 month and 1 year. Maintenance sirolimus target trough levels were 8 ng/mL in groups A and C. Each group received daclizumab induction and methylprednisolone maintenance. This first of two companion 1-year reports details demographics, drug-dosing interactions, and rejection. RESULTS: There were no notable differences in group demographics, but a somewhat less favorable course occurred in group C, despite higher bioavailability of sirolimus in group C versus group A (P<0.001). Acute rejection rates were lower in groups A (4%) and B (4%) combined versus group C (14%) (P=0.03). Histopathologic findings were supported by comparing perioperative with 1-year postoperative protocol biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: This 1-year interim analysis indicates that a decreasing dosage of tacrolimus with either adjunctive sirolimus or MMF may optimize future graft survival versus a less favorable outcome using a similar algorithm with CsA and sirolimus.     

Kidney transplantation with sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression: 5-year results of a randomized prospective trial compared to calcineurin inhibitor drugs

BACKGROUND: We report the 5-year outcomes from a randomized prospective trial in primary adult renal allograft recipients, designed to evaluate calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free immunosuppression on kidney transplant function. METHODS: Sixty-one patients were randomized to either sirolimus (n=31) or cyclosporine (n=30) after basiliximab induction and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with steroids. Sirolimus was concentration controlled at 10-12 ng/mL for at least 6 months. RESULTS: After 5 years, sirolimus-MMF-steroids compared to cyclosporine-MMF-steroids provides similar patient survival (87.1 vs. 90%, P=0.681), acute rejection rates (12.9 vs. 23.3%, P=0.22), total cholesterol (209.1 vs. 204.3 mg/dL, P=0.973), urine protein/creatinine ratios (0.398 vs. 0.478 mg/dL, P=0.72), and overall medical and surgical morbidity (P=NS). Although unadjusted patient survival was similar, sirolimus based CNI-free patients had longer death censored graft survival (96.4 vs. 76.7%, P=0.0265), higher glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by the abbreviated Modified Diet in Renal Disease (66.7 vs. 50.7 cc/min, P=0.0075), and fewer graft losses from chronic allograft nephropathy. The Banff chronic scores at two years were strong predictors of 5-year GFR. At 5 years, there were six de novo (three solid organ, three skin) cancers in the CNI group and only two de novo (one skin, one leukemia, no solid organ) cancers in the sirolimus group (P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: This study of low to moderate risk patients demonstrates that excellent 5-year kidney transplant outcomes can be achieved without CNI drugs, when therapeutic drug monitoring of sirolimus is employed. The application of CNI drug avoidance protocols to high-risk recipients (retransplants, highly sensitized, etc.), extrarenal allograft recipients, or alternative drug regimens such as steroid or MMF elimination should be subjected to controlled trials.     

Wound-healing complications after kidney transplantation: a prospective, randomized comparison of sirolimus and tacrolimus

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus has been associated with an increased risk of wound-healing complications in several retrospective analyses. The authors compared the rates of wound-healing complications in renal allograft recipients in a prospective, randomized trial of sirolimus-mycophenolate mofetil-prednisone versus tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil-prednisone. METHODS: All patients received antithymocyte globulin induction. In the first phase of the study, patients (n = 77) were included regardless of body mass index (BMI). In the second phase (n = 46 patients), the authors excluded patients with a BMI greater than 32 kg/m2, and the target trough sirolimus level was lowered to 10 to 15 ng/mL (previously 15-20 ng/mL). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of wound complications. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients received tacrolimus and 64 received sirolimus and were included in subsequent analyses. The incidence of complications was 8% (5 of 59) in the tacrolimus group and 47% (30 of 64) in the sirolimus group (P < 0.0001). Rates of perigraft fluid collections, superficial wound infections, and incisional herniae were significantly higher in the sirolimus group. Multivariate logistic regression showed only sirolimus (P = 0.0001) and BMI (P = 0.0021) to independently correlate with complications. In the first phase of the study, the wound complication rate in the sirolimus group was 55% (21 of 38 patients). After excluding obese recipients and decreasing the target sirolimus level, the wound complication rate in the sirolimus group was 35% (9 of 26 patients; P = 0.1040). CONCLUSIONS: The use of sirolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens leads to a higher incidence of wound-healing complications and will require new approaches to patient selection and management to decrease their incidence.     

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Steroid-Free Maintenance Regimens in Kidney Transplant Recipients—An Interim Analysis

We compared three maintenance immunosuppressive regimens in a rapid discontinuation of prednisone protocol. From March 1, 2001, through December 31, 2003, 239 first and second kidney transplant recipients (166 LD; 73 DD) were randomized. All recipients were treated with Thymoglobulin; all received steroids intraoperatively and for 5 days postoperatively. Randomization was to cyclosporine-mycophenolate mofetil (n = 85); high-level tacrolimus (TAC) (8-12 ng/mL)-low-level sirolimus (SRL) (3-7 ng/mL) (n = 72); or low-level TAC (3-7 ng/mL)-high-level SRL (8-12 ng/mL) (n = 82). We found no difference at 24 months between groups in patient, graft, death-censored graft, or acute rejection-free graft survival, or in kidney function. Wound complications were more common in SRL-treated recipients (p = 0.02); we found no other differences between groups in complication rates. Our data suggest that excellent patient and graft survival and low rejection rates can be obtained using a variety of maintenance protocols without prednisone.     

The Effect of Sirolimus on Prostate‐Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels in Male Renal Transplant Recipients Without Prostate Cancer

In kidney recipients, the immunosuppressant sirolimus has been associated with a decreased incidence of de novo posttransplant malignancies (including prostate cancer). But the effect of sirolimus on the prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) blood level, an important prostate cancer screening tool, remains unknown. We studied male kidney recipients >50 years old (transplanted from January 1994 to December 2006) without clinical evidence for prostate cancer. Pre‐ and posttransplant PSA levels were analyzed for 97 recipients (n = 19 on sirolimus, n = 78 on tacrolimus [control group]). Pretransplant PSA was similar for sirolimus versus tacrolimus recipients (mean, 1.8 versus 1.7 ng/mL, p = 0.89), but posttransplant PSA was significantly lower for recipients on sirolimus (mean, 0.9 versus 1.9 ng/mL, respectively, p < 0.001). The mean difference between pretransplant and posttransplant PSA was ?0.9 ng/mL (50.0%, p = 0.006) for the sirolimus group versus +0.2 ng/mL (+11.8%, p = 0.24) for the tacrolimus group. By multivariate analysis, only pretransplant PSA and immunosuppression with sirolimus independently impacted posttransplant PSA. Our data strongly suggest that sirolimus is associated with a significant PSA decrease in kidney recipients. Future studies must investigate the clinical implications of our findings for the use of PSA for prostate cancer screening in male kidney recipients on sirolimus.     

Living related kidney transplantation without calcineurin inhibitors: initial experience in a Mexican center

We performed a prospective randomized trial comparing sirolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/prednisone to cyclosporine/MMF/prednisone and selected induction therapy with basiliximab. Twenty patients received sirolimus (10 mg loading dose followed by 3 mg/m body surface area/day, keeping 24-hr trough levels at 10-15 ng/mL for six months and 5-10 ng/mL thereafter. Twenty-one patients began cyclosporine (4 to 8 mg/kg/day, keeping 12-hour trough levels at 150-300 ng/mL for 6 months and 100-200 ng/mL afterwards). Mean follow up was 15.8 months. One-year patient and graft survival was similar in both groups (>90%). Acute rejection rate was 16.6% in the sirolimus group and 5.2% in the cyclosporine group (P=NS). There were no differences in mean serum creatinine between groups. No patients who received basiliximab and had sirolimus target levels suffered acute rejection at one year. The sirolimus group had significantly higher cholesterol and triglycerides. A calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen using sirolimus produces comparable one-year transplant outcomes in living related kidney transplants compared to a calcineurin inhibitor regimen.     

Delayed Introduction of Reduced-Dose Tacrolimus, and Renal Function in Liver Transplantation: The 'ReSpECT' Study

We report a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label trial investigating the effect of lower levels and delayed introduction of tacrolimus on renal function in liver transplant recipients. Adult patients with good renal function undergoing primary liver transplant were randomized to either: group A (standard-dose tacrolimus [target trough levels >10 ng/mL] and corticosteroids; n = 183); group B (mycophenolate mofetil [MMF] 2g/day, reduced-dose tacrolimus [target trough levels ≤8 ng/mL], and corticosteroids; n = 170); group C (daclizumab induction, MMF, reduced-dose tacrolimus delayed until the fifth day posttransplant and corticosteroids, n = 172). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 52 weeks. The eGFR decreased by 23.61, 21.22 and 13.63 mL/min in groups A, B and C, respectively (A vs C, p = 0.012; A vs B, p = 0.199). Renal dialysis was required less frequently in group C versus group A (4.2% vs. 9.9%; p = 0.037). Biopsy-proven acute rejection rates were 27.6%, 29.2% and 19.0%, respectively. Patient and graft survival was similar. In conclusion, daclizumab induction, MMF, corticosteroids and delayed reduced-dose tacrolimus was associated with less nephrotoxicity than therapy with standard-dose tacrolimus and corticosteroids without compromising efficacy or tolerability.     

The use of an anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody and mycophenolate mofetil enables the use of a low-dose tacrolimus and early withdrawal of steroids in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Reducing calcineurin-inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity and simultaneously avoiding long-term steroid related side-effects is a desirable goal in renal transplantation. We examined the hypothesis that using anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody induction and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) would allow the lowering of target pre-dose blood concentrations of tacrolimus immediately after transplantation and subsequently stopping steroids at 5 months. METHODS: Eighty-two kidney recipients were enrolled in a single-center study comparing two tacrolimus-based protocols. Group I (n = 41) patients received a standard-dose tacrolimus (blood concentration 10-15 ng/mL) with MMF and a standard dose corticosteroid. Group II (n = 41) patients were treated with a low-dose tacrolimus (blood concentration 5-10 ng/mL) and MMF, a low-dose corticosteroid (stopped after 5 months) and induction with daclizumab. RESULTS: Patient (95.1 versus 100%) and graft survival (92.6 versus 97.5%) at 1 yr were not different between groups. Patients of group II experienced significantly less acute rejections than group I (17.1 versus 41.4% p = 0.03). Delayed graft function occurred less often in group II (5 versus 12% p = 0.43). Graft function at 1 yr was significantly better in group II (serum creatinine 1.49 versus 1.69 mg/dL and creatinine clearance 59.6 versus 49 mL/min; p < 0.05). Corticosteroids could be stopped after 5 months in 82.9% of group II patients. CONCLUSION: A regimen consisting of anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody induction and MMF allows the safe and efficient use of low-target pre-dose trough concentrations of tacrolimus and enables the early discontinuation of steroids. Preliminary results indicate a better 1-yr graft function compared to a normal-dose tacrolimus regimen.     

Tacrolimus monitoring in renal transplantation: a comparison between high-performance liquid chromatography and immunoassay

It is recommended that specific methods of tacrolimus monitoring rather than immunoassays, which overestimate tacrolimus levels, should be used in transplant recipients. Direct comparison of these techniques, however, has not been conducted in renal transplantation. In this study, 40 renal transplant recipients with tacrolimus monitoring by microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA; target trough level 10 to 15 ng/mL) were compared with 40 patients monitored by high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS; target trough level 8 to 13 ng/mL). All patients received anti CD25 antibody induction and mycophenolate mofetil in a steroid-sparing protocol. No differences were seen between MEIA and HPLC-MS groups in patient demographics. All patients were followed for 6 months. Patient survival was 100% in both groups; graft survival was 100% in the MEIA group and 97.5% in the HPLC-MS group. The groups did not differ in the number of dose changes required in the first 6 months or in the number of patients displaying tacrolimus levels within target range at 3 and 6 months. Delayed graft function occurred in 14 patients in the MEIA group and 12 patients in the HPLC-MS group (P = NS). Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in four patients in the MEIA group and one patient in the HPLC-MS group (P < .2). No differences were seen for the following parameters at 3 or 6 months: biopsy-proven tacrolimus nephrotoxicity, serum creatinine or estimated creatinine clearance, systolic or diastolic blood pressure, cholesterol, cytomegalovirus disease, posttransplant diabetes, or tremor. This study suggests that renal transplantation with HPLC-MS monitoring of tacrolimus is safe and effective.     

A Randomized Pharmacokinetic Study of Generic Tacrolimus Versus Reference Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Pharmacokinetic analyses comparing generic tacrolimus preparations versus the reference drug in kidney transplant patients are lacking. A prospective, multicenter, open‐label, randomized, two‐period (14 days per period), two‐sequence, crossover and steady‐state pharmacokinetic study was undertaken to compare twice‐daily generic tacrolimus (Sandoz) versus reference tacrolimus (Prograf®) in stable renal transplant patients. AUC_0–12h and peak concentration (C_max) were calculated from 12 h pharmacokinetic profiles at the end of each period (days 14 and 28). Of 71 patients enrolled, 68 provided evaluable pharmacokinetic data. The ratios of geometric means were 1.02 (90% CI 97–108%, p = 0.486) for AUC_0–12h and 1.09 (90% CI 101–118%, p = 0.057) for C_max. Mean (SD) C₀ was 7.3(1.8) ng/mL for generic tacrolimus versus 7.0(2.1) ng/mL for reference tacrolimus based on data from days 14 and 28. Correlations between 12 h trough levels and AUC were r = 0.917 for generic tacrolimus and r = 0.887 for reference drug at day 28. These data indicate that generic tacrolimus (Sandoz) has a similar pharmacokinetic profile to the reference drug and is bioequivalent in kidney transplant recipients according to US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency guidelines.     

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Late Conversion from CNI-Based to Sirolimus-Based Immunosuppression Following Renal Transplantation

Maintenance immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) following renal transplantation is associated with nephrotoxicity and accelerated graft loss. We aimed to assess whether conversion to sirolimus-based immunosuppression would affect the progression of renal impairment. In this single center, randomized controlled trial, 40 renal transplant recipients between 6 months and 8 years post-transplant were randomly assigned to remain on their CNI (cyclosporin or tacrolimus) or to switch to sirolimus. The primary outcome measure was change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurement at 12 months. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Of the 40 patients randomized, 2 patients never took the study drugs and were excluded, leaving 19 patients per group. There was a significant change in GFR at 12 months following conversion to sirolimus (12.9 mL/min, 95% CI 6.1-19.7; p < 0.001). Following conversion, the principal adverse events were the development of rashes (68%), particularly acne, and mouth ulcers (32%). No patient in either group experienced an acute rejection episode. In renal transplant recipients, a change in maintenance therapy from CNIs to sirolimus is associated with significant improvement in GFR at 12 months.     

Tacrolimus Combined with Two Different Dosages of Sirolimus in Kidney Transplantation: Results of a Multicenter Study

Tacrolimus combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an effective regimen in kidney transplantation. This study compared the efficacy of combining tacrolimus and two different dosages of sirolimus with an established tacrolimus-MMF regimen. Each day in addition to tacrolimus, 325 patients received 2 mg sirolimus (TAC-SRL2 mg), 325 patients received 0.5 mg sirolimus (TAC-SRL0.5 mg) and 327 patients 1 g MMF (TAC-MMF). The initial tacrolimus dose was 0.2 mg/kg/day. Sirolimus patients received loading doses of 6 or 1.5 mg, and daily doses of 2 or 0.5 mg thereafter. Steroid administration was identical for all groups. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was lower in the TAC-SRL2 mg group (15.7%) compared with the TAC-SRL0.5 mg (25.2%, p = 0.003) and the TAC-MMF groups (22.3%, p = 0.036). Six-month graft survival was 91.0% (TAC-SRL2 mg), 92.6% (TAC-SRL0.5 mg) and 92.4% (TAC-MMF); the respective values for patient survival were 98.1%, 97.8% and 97.9%. Thirty-four patients (10.5%), 19 patients (5.8%) and 16 patients (4.9%) in the TAC-SRL2 mg, TAC-SRL0.5 mg and TAC-MMF groups, respectively, discontinued the study because of adverse events. Hyperlipemia was reported more often in the TAC-SRL2 mg group (24.0%) compared with 19.4% (TAC-SRL0.5 mg) and 11.0% (TAC-MMF; p < 0.05). Combining 2 mg sirolimus/day with tacrolimus results in lower rates of acute rejection, but a higher incidence of adverse events.     

Tacrolimus (Pan Graf) as de novo therapy in renal transplant recipients in India

The safety and efficacy of tacrolimus in transplantation is well established. However, tacrolimus has only recently been available in India. We report an initial experience using tacrolimus as de novo therapy in a living related renal transplant program. Fifty-two consecutive recipients of living renal allografts were treated with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, or azathioprine and steroids. The dose of tacrolimus was adjusted to keep trough levels at 10 to 12 ng/mL in the first 3 months, 8 to 10 ng/mL in the next 3 months, and 5 to 8 ng/mL thereafter. Any evidence of graft dysfunction was evaluated by graft biopsy. The effect of this regimen on the lipid profile as well as the incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus was evaluated in an Indian population. All patients were followed for periods ranging from 6 to 72 weeks (mean = 29 weeks). The incidence of acute rejection was 3.84%; 17.3% developed posttransplant diabetes mellitus. Graft and patient survivals at the current follow-up were 100% and 96.26%. In conclusion, tacrolimus is a safe and effective immunosuppressant in a living related renal transplant program.     

Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) and Tacrolimus Monotherapy After Renal Transplantation: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial

The lymphocyte-depleting antibody alemtuzumab was evaluated in a prospective randomized multicenter trial in deceased donor kidney transplantation.
The 65 patients in the study group received induction with alemtuzumab followed by delayed tacrolimus monotherapy, while the 66 patients in the control group were started on tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. Tacrolimus levels of 8–12 ng/mL for the first 6 months and 5–8 ng/mL thereafter were aimed for in both groups.
At 12 months the biopsy-proven rejection rate was 20% in the study group and 32% in the control group (p = 0.09). Patient survival at 1 year was 98% for both groups. Graft survival was 96% for the study group versus 90% for the control group (p = 0.18).
Graft function was identical in both groups. Adverse events were similar in both groups apart for more CMV infections in the study group. At the end of the first year 82% of the patients in the study group were steroid-free and 71% continued on tacrolimus monotherapy.
These results suggest that alemtuzumab induction together with tacrolimus monotherapy is at least as efficient in renal transplantation as is a tacrolimus-based triple-drug regimen with a similar safety profile but more CMV infections.