McCune-Albright syndrome and acromegaly: effects of hypothalamopituitary radiotherapy and/or pegvisomant in somatostatin analog-resistant patients

BACKGROUND: Acromegaly, which may be present in patients with McCune-Albright syndrome (MCAS), in association with café-au-lait spots, precocious puberty, and fibrous dysplasia, is often difficult to treat surgically because skull base bone dysplasia prevents the removal of the pituitary adenoma. Somatostatin analogs (SAs) generally give only partial responses. The use of radiotherapy (RT) is controversial because of a possible risk of bone sarcomatous transformation. AIM: This study was a retrospective analysis of the efficacy and adverse effects of different treatment modalities in six patients with both MCAS and acromegaly. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Because surgery was impossible and SA failed to normalize GH/IGF-I hypersecretion, five of the six patients received fractionated RT (45-55 Grays). Three patients (two with previous RT) were also prescribed pegvisomant. We analyzed the clinical features of acromegaly, GH, and IGF-I concentrations and bone radiological features. RESULTS: GH and IGF-I concentrations fell after RT (median follow-up, 5 yr; range, 0.5-9 yr). Symptoms of acromegaly improved in parallel. Bone sarcomatous transformation was only noted in one patient in a region (the mandible) outside the radiation field. RT alone and/or combined with SA failed to normalize GH/IGF-I levels in the five patients concerned. In contrast, IGF-I levels normalized very rapidly (5-9 months) in the three patients receiving pegvisomant (10-20 mg/d). CONCLUSION: RT may be an option for the treatment of acromegaly in patients with MCAS when surgery is impossible and SA therapy is ineffective. However, although no bone sarcomatous transformation was observed within the radiation field in this series, this risk cannot be ruled out. As shown in this small series of severely affected patients, pegvisomant therapy may thus be useful to normalize IGF-I levels rapidly.     

Cabergoline addition to depot somatostatin analogues in resistant acromegalic patients: efficacy and lack of predictive value of prolactin status

BACKGROUND: Somatostatin analogues (SA) are currently the mainstay in the medical treatment of acromegaly. However, even high doses of depot SA for prolonged periods do not achieve GH-IGF-I normalization in some patients. Even though some data were reported about the addition of cabergoline, a long-acting dopamine agonist (DA), to SA in resistant patients, definite data are still lacking. DESIGN: Prospective open trial. PATIENTS: In 19 acromegalic patients with active disease (34-82 years old, seven males, 12 females) resistant to chronic (9-12 months) depot SA (octreotide-LAR, 30 mg/28 days in 13 patients, lanreotide, 60 mg/28 days intramuscularly in six patients) cabergoline was added (combined treatment). In these patients, SA treatment had partially relieved GH and IGF-I hypersecretion but no patient had achieved 'safe' GH and normal IGF-I-values. Eight patients had PRL levels greater than 15 micro g/l (range 16-60 micro g/l; 1 micro g = 21.2 mIU). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was positive for PRL in four out of eight operated patients. RESULTS: The addition of cabergoline, using the minimal effective and the maximal tolerated dose (range 1-3.5 mg/week), decreased GH from 6.6 +/- 0.9 to 4.6 +/- 0.6 micro g/l (P = 0.018), and IGF-I from 552 +/- 44 to 428 +/- 54 micro g/l (P = 0.019) after 6 months (median, range 3-18 Months). Combined treatment decreased GH to < 2.5 micro g/l in four patients (21%) and normalized IGF-I for age in eight patients (42%). It obtained a decline of both GH and IGF-I (-49 +/- 7%, and -47 +/- 5%, respectively) in nine patients (47%), and a partial improvement in six (32%) patients (GH decreased by 43 +/- 8% in four, and IGF-I by 35-38% in two patients). No change was observed in two patients, and worsening in two other patients. Results were not dependent on PRL status (serum levels or IHC). Combined treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of cabergoline to depot SA-resistant acromegalic patients is effective, not dependent on PRL values and normalizes IGF-I levels in 42% of patients. The association of long-acting DA and SA deserves a more relevant role in the therapeutical algorithm of acromegaly.     

Medical Management of Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas

The primary treatment of acromegaly remains transsphenoidal adenomectomy, yet the tissue overgrowth of acromegaly often progresses following surgery, and responds to radiotherapy only after significant delay. Persistently elevated serum growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentrations can be normalized in about half of post-surgery acromegalics using the pharmacologic alternatives presently available, the dopamine agonists (DA) and somatostatin (SST) analogs. Cabergoline, the most efficacious DA, normalizes IGF-I in approximately 37% of patients, whereas the long-acting SST analogs, Octreotide LAR and Lanreotide SR, do so in 66%. Significant tumor shrinkage may be attained with SST analogs in particular, and when necessary, the primary medical treatment of acromegaly may be successfully addressed with this class of drugs. Greatly enhanced efficacy is expected from the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant, which is nearing market availability and will enable the normalization of serum IGF-I in virtually all patients treated. We review here the pharmacologic treatments of excessive GH secretion.     

Gross total resection or debulking of pituitary adenomas improves hormonal control of acromegaly by somatostatin analogs

INTRODUCTION: Invasive GH-secreting pituitary adenomas are rarely cured by surgery and although long-term therapy with somatostatin analogs (SSAs) may be employed, hormonal control is achieved in only 60% of cases. The impact of tumor debulking on subsequent control of acromegaly with SSAs has not been studied previously. METHODS: We studied retrospectively the response to SSA therapy in acromegalic patients before and after incomplete surgical tumor excision. A case review identified 24 acromegalic patients who had received SSA therapy for > or = 1 month before and after gross total resection or debulking of adenomas. No patient received radiotherapy or combination treatment with SSAs and dopamine agonists during the study. GH and IGV-I responses to SSAs were recorded pre- and postoperatively. Postoperative SSA therapy was begun after a washout period of 1-3 months to assess the hormonal effects of the surgery alone. RESULTS: Before preoperative SSA treatment, 24/24 (100%) patients had elevated GH levels and IGF-I levels were elevated in 19/21 (90.5%) patients with recorded values. During preoperative SSA treatment, GH and IGF-I levels were normalized in 7/24 (29.2%) and 11/24 (45.8%) patients respectively. Following postoperative washout, GH was controlled in only 3/24 (12.5%) patients, while IGF-I was controlled in 8/19 (42.1%) patients with available data. During the second SSA treatment period, normal GH levels were seen in 13/24 (54.2%) patients, while IGF-I control was noted in 18/23 (78.3%). CONCLUSION: Gross total tumor resection or debulking increases the likelihood of achieving biochemical disease control with SSAs in acromegalic patients with adenomas that were not amenable to complete surgical resection and in whom primary SSA therapy was unable to achieve good biochemical control.     

An audit of long-term octreotide therapy for acromegaly

Abstract Background: Octreotide has been successfully used for the treatment of acromegaly, but little long-term data are available.
Aims: To determine the long-term efficacy and safety of octreotide in the treatment of acromegaly.
Methods: Twenty-seven patients with acromegaly were treated with octreotide in a non randomised study. Six patients had not had previous surgery or radiotherapy, and were treated with octreotide alone. Symptoms of acromegaly, IGF-I levels, growth hormone suppression by glucose, pituitary tumour size, and side effects were monitored. The median duration of treatment was 44 months (range six-102).
Results: Symptom control was excellent. Twenty (74%) patients had a reduction of IGF-I into the normal range. IGF-I levels fell after one year from 94.2±6.1 nmol/L (mean±SEM) to 50.0±2.7 nmol/L ( p <0.0001). Ten of 13 (77%) patients had normal IGF-I levels after four years. These reductions have persisted for up to nine years of octreotide therapy. The GH response to glucose was normalised in 14 of 16 (88%) subjects. Eleven of 25 (44%) patients had a reduction in pituitary gland height. Side effects were common, but usually of a minor nature. Cholelithiasis occurred in 39% of patients. Two patients ceased octreotide because of side effects.
Conclusions: We conclude that octreotide is an effective and safe long-term treatment for acromegaly. It is a useful adjunct to surgery, and may be offered as sole therapy for patients with smaller adenomas.     

Dynamic tests and basal values for defining active acromegaly

Acromegaly is a rare disease caused by excess secretion of growth hormone (GH), usually from a pituitary somatotrope adenoma. The prevalence of acromegaly is 38-40 cases/1,000,000 subjects, while the annual incidence is 3 new cases/1,000,000 subjects. The increase in morbidity and mortality associated with acromegaly is the result of GH and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I oversecretion and the direct mass effect of the pituitary tumor. Once the disease is clinically suspected, laboratory evaluation is mandatory to establish diagnosis. The standard method for the diagnosis of acromegaly has been the measuring of GH nadir (GHn) during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) which in normal individuals is undetectable, while acromegalics failed to suppress GH levels. Determination of IGF-I levels is useful as they correlate with clinical features of acromegaly and with the 24-hour mean GH levels. According to the more recent consensus, a random GH <0.4 microg/l and IGF-I in the age- and gender-matched normal range exclude the diagnosis of acromegaly. If either of these levels are not achieved, an OGTT should be performed, and then GHn <1 microg/l during OGTT excludes acromegaly. The therapeutic goals for acromegaly include the relief of sings and symptoms, the control of the tumor mass, the correction of the biochemical markers to normal levels, and the reduction in morbidity and mortality to the expected rate for the normal population. According to the 2000 consensus criteria, biochemical control of acromegaly is achieved when circulating IGF-I is reduced to an age- and sex-adjusted normal range and GHn during OGTT is <1 microg/l. There is debate in the literature whether GHn or IGF-I levels are more reliable to evaluate treatment of acromegaly. It has been reported that 15% of acromegalics with GHn <1 microg/l after treatment demonstrate abnormal IGF-I levels, while 15% of patients with normal IGF-I fail to suppress GH levels <1 microg/l during the OGTT. Probably, GHn and IGF-I levels represent two different aspects of disease activity in acromegaly. While IGF-I evaluates the secretory function of the somatotropes, GHn provides evidence of the presence or absence of functional autonomy of these cells.     

Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery for acromegaly

BACKGROUND: Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR) is an adjuvant treatment for acromegaly if surgery fails to normalize GH hypersecretion. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of GKR on tumor growth and hypersecretion, and to characterize the adverse effect of this treatment. DESIGN: Cross-sectional follow-up study. First, retrospective data pre- and post-GKR were collected. Patients then underwent a predefined survey including radiological, endocrinological, ophthalmological, and neurosurgical evaluation. Setting: Norwegian National Center for gamma knife treatment. Patients: Sixty-one patients treated with GKR for acromegaly. Out of 55, 53 living patients underwent a detailed survey. The mean follow-up was 5.5 years. No patient was lost to follow-up. RESULTS: Tumor growth was stopped in all patients. At 3, 5, and 10 years after GKR, 45, 58, and 86% of patients had normal IGF-I levels. Consecutive hormone value analysis showed that patients receiving GH-suppressive medication had a more rapid decline in hypersecretion than those who did not receive such medication. Evaluated by survey baseline values alone, non-elevated IGF-I and GH levels below 5 mIU/l were found in 38%. GH-suppressive medication was terminated in 16 out of 40 patients following GKR. Nine out of 53 surveyed patients (17%) had normal IGF-I and GH nadir below 2.6 mIU/l at glucose tolerance tests, while not on hormone-suppressive medication. Two patients developed minor visual field defects. Eight patients started hormone substitution therapy during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: GKR is an effective adjuvant treatment for residual acromegaly, carrying few side effects.     

Characterization of 24-hour growth hormone secretion in acromegaly: implications for diagnosis and therapy

OBJECTIVE Early studies of acromegaly undertaken before the general availability of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) assays have used arbitrary and varying growth hormone (GH) threshold levels for diagnosing and assessing outcome of treatment for this disease. We have undertaken a detailed study of GH secretion and its relationship to IGF-I levels to assess the usefulness of GH and IGF-I measurements in the assessment of acromegaly. PATIENTS Thirty acromegalic subjects (12 untreated and 16 previously treated) and 30 age and sex-matched normal subjects were studied. MEASUREMENTS Twenty-four-hour GH secretion was obtained from 20-minute sampling and serum IGF-I was measured. Comparisons were made of IGF-I, mean 24-hour GH concentration, and of the pulsatile and diurnal characteristics of GH secretion between the two groups. RESULTS IGF-I levels In untreated acromegaly were elevated and clearly separated from the normal range. Mean 24-hour GH concentrations in untreated and treated acromegalic subjects with elevated IGF-I (>40 nmol/l) were greater than (P < 0.01), and showed good separation from, those of normal subjects only after age-matching. From the 24-hour prollfes, nadir GH levels In normal subjects fell below the level of detectability while those in untreated acromegalic subjects did not. Pulse amplitude (P<0.01), ratio of pulsatile to non-pulsatile GH release and the night to daytime GH ratio (P<0 05) were significantly reduced in acromegaly. In the six patients who attained normal IGF-I levels after surgery, pulsatile characteristics remained abnormal in four. Mean 24-hour GH was significant related (r = 0.57) to IGF-I. A random GH concentration >2.5 μg/l (5 mlU/l) has a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 95% In identifying acromegalic patients who have biochemically active disease (elevated IGF-I) after treatment. CONCLUSIONS Patients with active acromegaly secrete more GH than age-matched normal controls. GH secretion in acromegaly is characterized by marked blunting of pulsatile secretion and, in contrast to normal subjects, the failure of GH to fall to undetectable levels at any time during the 24-hour day. IGF-I measurement is a more practical alternative in the diagnosis of acromegaly and in the assessment of therapeutic outcome. Since abnormalities of GH regulation may persist despite normalization of IGF-I, a distinction between remission and cure should be made. Detailed post-treatment evaluation of GH secretion is necessary to define the nature of underlying GH regulation and to evaluate the risk of disease recurrence.     

Ghrelin test for the assessment of GH status in successfully treated patients with acromegaly

OBJECTIVE: Posttreatment assessment of disease activity and definition of cure of acromegaly, using measurement of GH secretion, remains problematic. Furthermore, with our efforts to achieve tight biochemical control of the disease it is foreseeable that a proportion of patients may be rendered GH deficient, thus requiring testing for GH deficiency. The aim of our study was to evaluate residual GH secretion in cured patients with acromegaly. DESIGN AND METHODS: At baseline, circulating GH, IGF-I, IGFBP-3, leptin and lipid (cholesterol and tri-glycerides) levels were measured in 33 acromegalic patients nine years after treatment with surgery of whom 6 were additionally irradiated. Two tests were performed: the GH suppression test--oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and the GH provocation test--ghrelin test (1 microg/kg i.v. bolus) and the results were compared with 11 age- and sex-matched control subjects. RESULTS: According to the consensus criteria (normal IGF-I levels and post-OGTT GH nadir <1 microg/l), 21 treated acromegalic patients were cured, 6 had discordant IGF-I and GH nadir values during OGTT, while 6 had persistent acromegaly. After the GH provocative test with ghrelin (cut-off for severe GH deficiency is GH <3 microg/l), we detected 9 severely GH deficient patients (GHD) among 21 cured acromegalic patients. Mean GH peak (+/-s.e.m.) response to the ghrelin test in GHD acromegalics was significantly lower compared with acromegalics with sufficient GH secretory capacity and control subjects (1.2 +/- 0.2 microg/l vs 20.1 +/- 2.4 microg/l vs 31.1 +/- 2.5 microg/l respectively, P<0.0001). Mean IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels were not different between GHD and GH-sufficient cured acromegalics. Leptin levels and body mass index (BMI) were significantly higher in GHD male acromegalics compared with GH-sufficient male acromegalics. GHD female acromegalics tended to have higher BMIs while leptin levels were not different. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of residual GH secretory capacity by the GH provocation test is necessary in the long-term follow-up of successfully treated acromegalics since a large proportion of these patients are rendered GH deficient.     

Treatment of acromegaly with SS analogues: should GH and IGF-I target levels be lowered to assert a tight control of the disease?

BACKGROUND: in acromegaly, the criteria for the cure of the disease after neurosurgery have become tighter and tighter. In contrast, the evaluation of control of disease activity during medical treatment is based upon the normalisation of IGF-I levels and epidemiological criteria, i.e. lessening GH (assessed by RIA) to levels reported to normalise increased mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate GH and IGF-I suppression during prolonged SS analogues (SA) treatment. The concordance between "safe" GH and normalised IGF-I levels during SA was also assessed, according to gender and gonadal status. DESIGN: multicentre, retrospective. Patients. GH/IGF-I levels were evaluated in 207 acromegalic patients (132 females, aged 20-85 yr) during a prolonged treatment (longer than 12 months) with individually tailored doses of depot SA( lanreotide or octreotide-LAR in 97 and 110 patients, respectively). Final IGF-I levels were transformed in z-scores using data collected in a large cohort of normal subjects of 3 different age groups (20-40 yr old, 41-60 yr old, 61-80 yr old, n=160, 148, 115, respectively), that allowed to set up quartiles of normality (I = 3rd-25th percentile, II = 26th-50th, III = 51th-75th, IV = 76th-97th). RESULTS: fifty-nine and 19.3% of patients achieved GH levels <2.5 and <1 microg/l, respectively. IGF-I were normalised (z-score between 2 and -2) in 58.4% of patients. The distribution of normal IGF-I values among quartiles was uneven: 7%, 19%, 25%, and 49% of values were distributed in the I, II, III, and IV quartile, respectively. The concordance between GH and IGF-I values was poor: 28.4% of patients attaining GH values <2.5 microg/l had still pathological IGF-I (even 12.5% of those with GH <1 microg/l), and 39.3% of those with GH levels still above the "safe" limit had "nor IGF-I. Although proportions of IGF-I normalisation were not different between males and females, the regression line obtained between GH and IGF-I z-score showed the same slope but with a significantly lower intercept in regularly cycling women than in males and in postmenopausal females. Thus for any GH value, cycling females had lower IGF-I than menopausal women and males, and their IGF-I normalisation could be achieved by higher GH values. By ROC analysis, the achievement of normal IGF-I was predicted by the GH value of 1.8 microg/l in males and 2.4 microg/l in females. Conclusions: in acromegalic patients on SA treatment, GH and IGF-I levels are often not concordant. In addition to age, sex is to be taken into account in the evaluation of hormonal targets. A better refinement of GH and IGF-I targets to be reached while on treatment with SA is warranted.     

Raloxifene decreases serum IGF-I in male patients with active acromegaly

OBJECTIVE: Most patients with acromegaly require additional treatments after trans-sphenoidal surgery. Although traditional methods of treatment aim at suppressing GH hypersecretion from the pituitary tumor, recent studies on the use of the GH receptor antagonist have shown that targeting the action of GH on peripheral tissues may be more effective. Estrogens and the selective estrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen have been used previously to suppress circulating IGF-I levels in patients with acromegaly. Positive effects of raloxifene in women with active acromegaly have been reported recently. This study was designed to examine the potential role of raloxifene in the treatment of acromegaly in male patients. DESIGN: We studied eight men with active acromegaly despite the fact that they were receiving traditional treatments. All subjects were treated with raloxifene (60 mg twice a day) for a median of 5 weeks. METHODS: The effects of raloxifene on GH secretion were assessed by obtaining 24-h GH profiles and studying the response of GH to various stimuli before and after treatment with raloxifene. Serum IGF-I was measured before and after raloxifene treatment. RESULTS: Raloxifene did not affect basal GH secretion or response of GH to TRH, GHRH or glucose, but it decreased circulating IGF-I by 16+/-4% (P=0.001), and normalized plasma IGF-I in two patients. No changes in clinical parameters were observed. Prolactin levels, the prolactin response to TRH and free testosterone levels remained unchanged. Raloxifene was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Raloxifene might be useful in the treatment of male patients with active acromegaly, but longer term studies are clearly needed.     

In vivo and in vitro effects of octreotide, quinagolide and cabergoline in four hyperprolactinaemic acromegalics: correlation with somatostatin and dopamine D2 receptor scintigraphy

OBJECTIVE: GH and PRL cosecretion frequently occurs in acromegaly and the sensitivity of both hormones to somatostatin analogs (SA) and dopamine agonists (DA) alone or in combination, is still debated. This study was designed to evaluate the in vivo and in vitro sensitivity to SA and/or DA and correlate the response in terms of hormone suppression to the results of in vivo somatostatin and dopamine receptor scintigraphy and to the immunohistochemical findings. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Scintigraphy using 111In-DTPA-D-Phe(1)-OCT (111In-OCT) and 123I-methoxybenzamide (123I-IBZM) was performed in four patients with acromegaly and high circulating GH, PRL and IGF-I levels. The results were correlated with the response to long-term treatment with octreotide (OCT), quinagolide (QN) and/or cabergoline (CAB), to the in vitro hormone suppression by OCT and DA in primary cultures from the pituitary tumors and to the immunohistochemical findings. RESULTS: The first patient showed high tumour uptake of 111In-OCT and 123I-IBZM, the second high uptake of only 111In-OCT, while the third one showed faint tumour uptake of only 123I-IBZM, and the fourth a faint uptake of 111In-OCT. In the first and in the fourth patients OCT or CAB administered alone failed to normalize hormone levels while the combined treatment induced circulating GH, IGF-I and PRL normalization. In the second patient OCT administered alone normalized hormone levels while QN reduced PRL levels only. In the third patient both OCT and QN, alone or in combination, failed to normalize hormone levels. However, in this patient GH and PRL suppression was significantly greater after QN than OCT treatment. After medical therapy, all the patients were operated on. Immunohistochemistry showed diffuse GH and focal PRL staining in the first patient, while diffuse GH and PRL staining in the remaining three. In vitro, OCT significantly suppressed GH secretion in the four primary pituitary tumor cultures, while PRL secretion was significantly suppressed only in the second and the fourth cases. Dopamine agonists (DA) significantly suppressed PRL release in all the cultures, while GH secretion was significantly suppressed in three out of four. CONCLUSIONS: These four acromegalics, presenting similar clinical findings and comparable peripheral hormone levels, showed different responsiveness to SA and DA. Moreover, during the in vitro study on primary tumor cell cultures, OCT and DA displayed an inhibiting activity on GH and PRL secretion positively correlated with the response observed in vivo. This evidence together with the in vivo receptor imaging study suggest the existence of somatostatin and/or dopamine D2 receptor heterogeneity in this class of pituitary tumors. The new potent DA might be primarily considered in the medical treatment of hyperprolactinemic acromegalics, while SA alone or in combination with DA in case of ineffective hormone suppression.     

Treatment of acromegaly: is there still a place for radiotherapy?

Objective To evaluate efficacy and safety of radiotherapy on acromegaly treatment. Design and patients We followed retrospectively 99 acromegalic patients for at least one year after radiotherapy (RT). RT had been performed after unsuccessful surgery in 91 patients and as primary treatment in eight. Time elapsed between surgery and RT was 1.4 ± 2.4 years. Mean follow-up after RT was 5.9 ± 4.7 years (1–16 years). All patients were treated with linear accelerator, 89 by conventional (3240–6000 cGY) and ten by stereotactic RT. Measurements Biochemical remission was defined as GH < 2.5 ng/ml and IGF-I normalization. Results At latest follow-up, 54% of patients had serum GH level <2.5 ng/ml; 42% had normal IGF-I and 38% of patients achieved normalization of both. Controlled patients had lower baseline GH and IGF-I levels compared to uncontrolled ones. They achieved remission after 3.8 ± 2.4 years, a significantly lower time length compared to maximum follow-up of uncontrolled (6.0 ± 4.9 year). Results regarding GH and IGF-I levels were similar in patients treated either primarily or after surgery. No patient showed tumor growth. Visual field defects were observed in four, seizures in one, and mental disorders in two patients, although cognitive function were not properly assessed. At the last follow-up, 47% of patients had acquired at least one hormonal deficiency. Conclusions There is still a place for RT in acromegaly treatment, mainly for: after non-curative surgery and poor response or inaccessibility to medical treatment; growth restraining of aggressive macroadenomas; co-morbidities that contraindicate surgery and surgery refusal. However, side effects and latency period to achieve disease control should be kept in mind.     

Control of growth hormone and IGF1 in patients with acromegaly in the UK: responses to medical treatment with somatostatin analogues and dopamine agonists

Objective

We investigated the control of GH and IGF1 in acromegaly in routine clinical practice in the UK on and off medical treatment.

Design

The UK Acromegaly Register collected routine biochemical and clinical data on patients with acromegaly from 31 UK centres with GH data covering >30y.

Patients

We identified 2572 patients. Somatostatin analogues (SMS) were used in 40·6% and dopamine agonists (DA) in 41·4%.

Measurements

We identified 29,181 GH records linked to data on IGF1, surgery, radiotherapy and medical treatment and derived data on 9900 distinct Periods of Care including 4206 courses of medical treatment. We considered GH controlled when ≤2 μg/l.

Results

Control of GH and IGF1 improved over time, particularly on medical treatment. Control on medical treatment was better after prior surgery and/or radiotherapy. On long‐term SMS, GH was controlled in 75%, IGF1 in 69% and both in 55%; on long‐term DA, GH control was similar but IGF1 worse (77%/55%/45%). Responses to long‐term treatment with octreotide LAR and lanreotide autogel were broadly similar, but we noted a failure to escalate SMS to maximal effective dose. Increasing precourse GH levels were associated with a decreasing proportion who achieved control, despite greater suppression from baseline.

Conclusions

Control of acromegaly in the UK is improving, but ‘safe’ GH levels are still only achieved in 75% on long‐term medical treatment, with GH and IGF1 both normalized in no more than 55% on SMS and 36% on cabergoline. It remains unclear whether the control of GH, but not IGF1, observed in many patients is sufficient to restore long‐term morbidity and mortality to normal.     

Gender, body weight, disease activity, and previous radiotherapy influence the response to pegvisomant

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: To effectively normalize IGF-I in patients with acromegaly, various covariates may affect dosing and plasma concentrations of pegvisomant. We assessed whether sex, age, weight, and previous radiotherapy influence dosing of pegvisomant in patients with active disease. DESIGN: Data from 69 men and 49 women participating in multicenter, open-label trials of pegvisomant were retrospectively evaluated using multiple regression techniques. Sixty-nine subjects (39 men, 30 women) had undergone external beam pituitary radiotherapy. Serum IGF-I was at least 30% above age-related upper limit of normal in all patients at study entry. After a loading dose of pegvisomant (80 mg), patients were commenced on 10 mg/d. Pegvisomant dose was adjusted by 5 mg every eighth week until serum IGF-I was normalized. RESULTS: At baseline, men had significantly higher mean serum IGF-I levels than women despite similar GH levels. After treatment with pegvisomant, IGF-I levels were similar in men and women. A significant correlation between baseline GH, IGF-I, body weight, and the dose of pegvisomant required to normalize serum IGF-I was observed (all P < 0.001). Women required an average of 0.04 mg/kg more pegvisomant than men and a mean weight-corrected dose of 19.2 mg/d to normalize serum IGF-I [14.5 mg/d (men); P < 0.001]. Patients treated with radiotherapy required less pegvisomant to normalize serum IGF-I despite similar baseline GH/IGF-I levels (15.2 vs. 18.5 mg/d for no previous radiotherapy; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Sex, body weight, previous radiotherapy, and baseline GH/IGF-I influence the dose of pegvisomant required to normalize serum IGF-I in patients with active acromegaly.     

Gender and age influence the relationship between serum GH and IGF-I in patients with acromegaly

BACKGROUND: In patients with acromegaly serum IGF-I is increasingly used as a marker of disease activity. As a result, the relationship between serum GH and IGF-I is of profound interest. Healthy females secrete three times more GH than males but have broadly similar serum IGF-I levels, and women with GH deficiency require 30-50% more exogenous GH to maintain the same serum IGF-I as GH-deficient men. In a selected cohort of patients with active acromegaly, studied off medical therapy using a single fasting serum GH and IGF-I measurement, we have reported previously that, for a given GH level, women have significantly lower circulating IGF-I. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of age and gender on the relationship between serum GH and IGF-I in an unselected cohort of patients with acromegaly independent of disease control and medical therapy. METHODS: Sixty (34 male) unselected patients with acromegaly (median age 51 years (range 24-81 years) attending a colonoscopy screening programme were studied. Forty-five had previously received pituitary radiotherapy. Patients had varying degrees of disease control and received medical therapy where appropriate. Mean serum GH was calculated from an eight-point day profile (n = 45) and values obtained during a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (n = 15). Serum IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and acid-labile subunit were measured and the dependency of these factors on covariates such as log10 mean serum GH, sex, age and prior radiotherapy was assessed using regression techniques. RESULTS: The median calculated GH value was 4.7 mU/l (range 1-104). A significant linear association was observed between serum IGF-I and log10 mean serum GH for the cohort (R = 0.5, P < 0.0001). After simultaneous adjustment of the above covariates a significant difference in the relationship between mean serum GH and IGF-I was observed for males and females. On average, women had serum IGF-I levels 11.44 nmol/l lower than men with the same mean serum GH (P = 0.03, 95% CI 1.33-21.4 nmol/l). Age significantly influenced the relationship and for a given serum GH, IGF-I was estimated to fall by 0.37 nmol/l per year (P = 0.04, 95% CI 0.015-0.72). CONCLUSIONS: In keeping with previous observations of relative GH resistance in normal and GH-deficient females we have observed lower serum IGF-I levels for equivalent mean serum GH levels in females patients with acromegaly. This gender-dependent difference is independent of disease activity and the use of concomitant medical therapy. Additionally, we have demonstrated that for a given serum GH level, age significantly influences IGF-I concentrations in patients with acromegaly. These data have important implications for the use of serum IGF-I and GH as markers of disease activity in acromegaly.     

Current management practices for acromegaly: an international survey

To determine whether peer-reviewed consensus statements have changed clinical practice, we surveyed acromegaly care in specialist centers across the globe, and determined the degree of adherence to published consensus guidelines on acromegaly management. Sixty-five acromegaly experts who participated in the 7th Acromegaly Consensus Workshop in March 2009 responded. Results indicated that the most common referring sources for acromegaly patients were other endocrinologists (in 26% of centers), neurosurgeons (25%) and primary care physicians (21%). In sixty-nine percent of patients, biochemical diagnoses were made by evaluating results of a combination of growth hormone (GH) nadir/basal GH and elevated insulin like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels. In both Europe and the USA, neurosurgery was the treatment of choice for GH-secreting microadenomas and for macroadenomas with compromised visual function. The most widely used criteria for neurosurgical outcome assessment were combined measurements of IGF-I and GH levels after oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 3 months after surgery. Ninety-eight percent of respondents stated that primary treatment with somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) was indicated at least sometime during the management of acromegaly patients. In nearly all centers (96%), the use of pegvisomant monotherapy was restricted to patients who had failed to achieve biochemical control with SRL therapy. The observation that most centers followed consensus statement recommendations encourages the future utility of these workshops aimed to create uniform management standards for acromegaly.     

Basal and Glucose-Suppressed GH Levels Less Than 1 μg/L in Newly Diagnosed Acromegaly

The development of highly sensitive and specific GH assays has necessitated a critical re-evaluation of the biochemical criteria needed for the diagnosis of acromegaly. Use of these assays has revealed that GH levels after oral glucose in healthy subjects and postoperative patients with active acromegaly can be significantly less than previously recognized with older GH assays. In order to assess GH criteria for newly diagnosed acromegaly with a modern assay we have evaluated GH levels in 25 patients referred to our Neuroendocrine Unit for evaluation of untreated acromegaly. All patients underwent measurement of basal GH and IGF-I levels and 15 of these patients also underwent oral glucose tolerance testing for GH suppression (OGTT). Basal GH levels were < 1.0 microg/L at diagnosis in 5 of these 25 patients. Nadir GH levels were less than 1 microg/L also in 5 of 15 patients, and as low as 0.42 microg/L. All patients had elevated IGF-I levels preoperatively and pathological confirmation of a GH secreting pituitary tumor at the time of transsphenoidal surgery. The clinical presentations of these patients was variable. Most patients presented with classical manifestations of acromegaly, but 3 of the 5 patients with low nadir GH values had only very subtle signs of acromegaly. Although most newly diagnosed patients have classically elevated GH levels and obvious clinical features of acromegaly, early recognition of disease may uncover patients with milder biochemical and clinical abnormalities. The diagnosis should not be discounted in patients who have elevated IGF-I levels, but have basal or nadir GH levels less than 1 microg/L. Conventional GH criteria for the diagnosis of acromegaly cannot be applied to the use of modern sensitive and specific GH assays.     

Hormonal and metabolic effects of radiotherapy in acromegaly: long-term results in 128 patients followed in a single center

Conventional radiotherapy is usually indicated in acromegaly when surgery fails to normalize GH secretion. However, the benefits of radiotherapy are delayed. This has raised questions about the potency of this treatment for reaching the safe GH level of 2.5 microg/L and for normalizing insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels, both of which are currently recommended as the therapeutic goal. To evaluate the long-term hormonal and metabolic effects of radiotherapy in acromegaly, a retrospective analysis was undertaken studying 128 patients followed for 11.5+/-8.5 yr (mean +/- SD) in a single center. The preradiation GH levels decreased as a function of time to 50% at 2 yr, 20% at 5 yr, and 10% at 10 yr. Basal GH levels below 2.5 microg/L were obtained in 7% of the patients at 2 yr, 35% at 5 yr, 53% at 10 yr, and 66% at 15 yr. A basal GH level below 2.5 microg/L was associated with suppression of GH below 2 microg/L during an oral glucose tolerance test and normalization of IGF-I levels in 9 of 10 patients. Preradiation GH levels was the sole factor that could predict the delay in GH fall to below 2.5 microg/L (P = 0.008). At the last follow-up, IGF-I levels were normalized in 79% of the patients (37 of 47; mean follow-up, 15.0+/-11.3 yr). In the 32 patients presenting with diabetes mellitus, improvement of glucose tolerance was associated with lower GH levels after treatment (35+/-78 microg/L in the group of 13 patients still presenting diabetes; 9+/-12 microg/L in the group of 4 patients with glucose intolerance; 5+/-8 microg/L in the 14 patients with normal glucose tolerance; P = 0.04). Ten years after termination of radiotherapy gonadotroph, thyreotroph and corticotroph deficiencies were observed in 80%, 78%, and 82% of the patients, respectively. In conclusion, conventional radiotherapy can reduce GH levels below the optimal level of 2.5 microg/L and normalize IGF-I levels in acromegaly. However, the incidence of late hypopituitarism is high, and the delay to obtain this safe GH secretory status can be long, depending on the preradiation GH level. These parameters should be considered when adjuvant therapy is needed after surgery.     

Conventional pituitary irradiation is effective in normalising plasma IGF-I in patients with acromegaly

OBJECTIVE: For patients in whom acromegaly persists despite pituitary surgery, conventional pituitary irradiation represents an additional treatment option. A 30-60% cure rate is described in the literature, but these studies did not utilise strict rules of remission, such as "safe" GH levels <2.5 microg/l, and age-adjusted normal IGF-I levels. DESIGN AND METHODS: We report the outcome of 41 patients with acromegaly who received pituitary conventional external irradiation. The median follow-up time was 12.8 years (3.7-43.4 years) post-radiotherapy. RESULTS: The median pre-irradiation GH level was 31.0 microg/l (7.0-210 microg/l). Information on IGF-I levels was only available for 6 patients prior to therapy. Utilising strict rules of remission, one-third (14/41) of our patients had normal biochemical parameters, i.e. "safe" GH (0.5 microg/l (range 0.2-1.6 microg/l)) and normal age-adjusted IGF-I levels (multiple of upper limit of normal range (xULN); 0.45 (0.2-1.0)) at the end of the follow-up period. An additional 9 patients achieved normal levels with adjunctive drug therapy. Furthermore, disease activity was reduced in a considerable proportion of the 18 patients who did not achieve normal biochemical levels (GH: 3.6 microg/l (1.9-15.7 microg/l); xULN of IGF-I: 1.6 (0.9-2.6)). In retrospect, remission is unlikely in patients who had a GH level greater than 52 microg/l (mean+2 s.d. of cured patients) prior to radiotherapy. In addition to the 12 patients with pre-irradiation pituitary functional deficiency, another 11 patients developed symptoms of panhypopituitarism during the 3-year period following irradiation. Within a 6-year period, partial pituitary insufficiency was observed in a further 7 patients, thus necessitating hormone substitution treatment. CONCLUSION: Using strict rules of remission, in our cohort we found both a normalisation of IGF-I and safe GH levels in 34% of patients treated for acromegaly with conventional irradiation therapy.