Recurrent NF1 gene mutation in a patient with oligosymptomatic neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1).

We report a 21-year-old male with symptomatic optic glioma who does not fulfill the diagnosis of neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) according to standard NIH criteria. Analysis of the NF1 gene revealed a recurrent mutation in exon 37 (C6792A or Y2264X). This nonsense mutation causes skipping of exon 37 during the splicing process and is predicted to result in a protein shortened by 34 amino acid residues. The mutation was detected in all tissues examined (blood lymphocytes, oral mucosa, and dermal fibroblasts). The same mutation was previously found in 3 patients with clinically confirmed NF1. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an adult patient carrying a putative (non-mosaic) NF1 gene mutation in multiple tissues but not fulfilling the NIH criteria for the clinical diagnosis of NF1.     

Multiple spinal ganglioneuromas in a patient harboring a pathogenic NF1 mutation

Bacci C, Sestini R, Ammannati F, Bianchini E, Palladino T, Carella M, Melchionda S, Zelante L, Papi L. Multiple spinal ganglioneuromas in a patient harboring a pathogenic NF1 mutation. Ganglioneuroma is a rare benign tumor originating from autonomic ganglia and is considered the benign counterpart of neuroblastoma. Ganglioneuromas may be present as an isolated finding and, rarely, in association with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). However, ganglioneuromas of the cervical spine with intradural extension and multiple locations are extremely rare. We describe a 32‐year‐old woman with multiple ganglioneuromas of the cervical, dorsal and lumbar spine associated with a few café‐au‐lait spots and subcutaneous nodules. The patient lacked other NF1 stigmata, such as freckling, Lisch nodules and cutaneous neurofibromas. Although our patient did not fulfill the NF1 diagnostic criteria, molecular diagnosis revealed a pathogenic mutation in the NF1 gene. Approximately 30 patients affected by NF1 and ganglioneuromas have been reported: in all these individuals, NF1 diagnosis was made according to the clinical diagnostic criteria and no patients have molecular diagnosis. Therefore, this is the first case with multiple spinal ganglioneuromas associated with a pathogenic NF1 mutation.     

Extensive in silico analysis of NF1 splicing defects uncovers determinants for splicing outcome upon 5' splice-site disruption

We describe 94 pathogenic NF1 gene alterations in a cohort of 97 Austrian neurofibromatosis type 1 patients meeting the NIH criteria. All mutations were fully characterized at the genomic and mRNA levels. Over half of the patients carried novel mutations, and only a quarter carried recurrent minor-lesion mutations at 16 mutational warm spots. The remaining patients carried NF1 microdeletions (7%) and rare recurring mutations. Thirty-six of the mutations (38%) altered pre-mRNA splicing, and fall into five groups: exon skipping resulting from mutations at authentic splice sites (type I), cryptic exon inclusion caused by deep intronic mutations (type II), creation of de novo splice sites causing loss of exonic sequences (type III), activation of cryptic splice sites upon authentic splice-site disruption (type IV), and exonic sequence alterations causing exon skipping (type V). Extensive in silico analyses of 37 NF1 exons and surrounding intronic sequences suggested that the availability of a cryptic splice site combined with a strong natural upstream 3' splice site (3'ss)is the main determinant of cryptic splice-site activation upon 5' splice-site disruption. Furthermore, the exonic sequences downstream of exonic cryptic 5' splice sites (5'ss) resemble intronic more than exonic sequences with respect to exonic splicing enhancer and silencer density, helping to distinguish between exonic cryptic and pseudo 5'ss. This study provides valuable predictors for the splicing pathway used upon 5'ss mutation, and underscores the importance of using RNA-based techniques, together with methods to identify microdeletions and intragenic copy-number changes, for effective and reliable NF1 mutation detection.     

Noonan syndrome and neurofibromatosis type I in a family with a novel mutation in NF1

Noonan syndrome (NS) and neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) belong to a group of clinically related disorders that share a common pathogenesis, dysregulation of the RAS‐MAPK pathway. NS is characterized by short stature, heart defect, pectus deformity and facial dysmorphism, whereas skin manifestations, skeletal defects, Lisch nodules and neurofibromas are characteristic of NF1. Both disorders display considerable clinical variability. Features of NS have been observed in individuals with NF1 –a condition known as neurofibromatosis–Noonan syndrome (NFNS). The major gene causing NFNS is NF1. Rarely, a mutation in PTPN11 in addition to an NF1 mutation is present. We present the clinical and molecular characterization of a family displaying features of both NS and NF1, with complete absence of neurofibromas. To investigate the etiology of the phenotype, mutational analysis of NF1 was conducted, revealing a novel missense mutation in exon 24, p.L1390F, affecting the GAP‐domain. Additional RAS‐MAPK pathway genes were examined, but no additional mutations were identified. We confirm that NF1 mutations are involved in the etiology of NFNS. Furthermore, based on our results and previous studies we suggest that evaluation of the GAP‐domain of NF1 should be prioritized in NFNS.     

NF1 Molecular Characterization and Neurofibromatosis Type I Genotype–Phenotype Correlation: The French Experience

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) affects about one in 3,500 people in all ethnic groups. Most NF1 patients have private loss‐of‐function mutations scattered along the NF1 gene. Here, we present an original NF1 investigation strategy and report a comprehensive mutation analysis of 565 unrelated patients from the NF‐France Network. A NF1 mutation was identified in 546 of the 565 patients, giving a mutation detection rate of 97%. The combined cDNA/DNA approach showed that a significant proportion of NF1 missense mutations (30%) were deleterious by affecting pre‐mRNA splicing. Multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification allowed the identification of restricted rearrangements that would have been missed if only sequencing or microsatellite analysis had been performed. In four unrelated families, we identified two distinct NF1 mutations within the same family. This fortuitous association points out the need to perform an exhaustive NF1 screening in the case of molecular discordant‐related patients. A genotype–phenotype study was performed in patients harboring a truncating (N = 368), in‐frame splicing (N = 36), or missense (N = 35) mutation. The association analysis of these mutation types with 12 common NF1 clinical features confirmed a weak contribution of the allelic heterogeneity of the NF1 mutation to the NF1 variable expressivity.     

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1): Identification of eight unreported mutations in NF1 gene in Italian patients [corrected

In the present study the entire NF1 coding region was analyzed for mutations in 132 unrelated Italian NF1 patients. Using PTT, SSCP, and DNA sequencing, we found 8 novel mutations. Clinical diagnosis of NF1 was established according to the NIH consensus criteria. We detected 59 truncated fragments, and 46 of them were characterized by SSCP and direct sequencing. Eight mutations represent novel changes that contribute to the germline mutational spectrum of the NF1 gene. In two patients, premature termination was due to substitutions at nucleotide c.3982C>T (Q1298X) and c.7411C>T (Q2471X), respectively. Two other mutations were caused by the deletions (1756delA, 4699delA), and two by the insertions (c.5266_5267insT, c.7464_7465insTCCA) of a small number of nucleotides. Lastly, we found 2 splice-site mutations (c.2252-2A>C, c.2251+1G>A).     

Neurofibromatosis type 1 in two siblings due to maternal germline mosaicism

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is caused by loss of function mutations of the NF1 gene, which are de novo in 50% of cases. Although this gene shows one of the highest mutation rates in the human genome, germline mosaicism is very rare in this condition. We describe the molecular analysis of a family in which neurofibromatosis type 1 occurred in two out of four siblings born to unaffected parents. Molecular analysis of the NF1 gene identified in both patients the same splicing mutation c.1392+1G>A, which was absent in parental lymphocytes. Microsatellite analysis showed that the two affected siblings shared the same maternal allele, however a specific PCR‐RFLP assay excluded the presence of the NF1 splicing mutation in multiple maternal tissues. Our molecular and clinical findings are consistent with a germline mosaicism for the NF1 splicing mutation. This is the first case of maternal germline mosaicism for a NF1 mutation characterized so far at the molecular level. Our data confirm that germline mosaicism is rare in neurofibromatosis 1, but it has important implications for genetic counseling.     

A novel MEIS2 mutation explains the complex phenotype in a boy with a typical NF1 microdeletion syndrome

Concurrence of distinct genetic conditions in the same patient is not rare. Several cases involving neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) have recently been reported, indicating the need for more extensive molecular analysis when phenotypic features cannot be explained by a single gene mutation. Here, we describe the clinical presentation of a boy with a typical NF1 microdeletion syndrome complicated by cleft palate and other dysmorphic features, hypoplasia of corpus callosum, and partial bicoronal craniosynostosis caused by a novel 2bp deletion in exon 2 of Meis homeobox 2 gene (MEIS2) inherited from the mildly affected father. This is only the second case of an inherited MEIS2 intragenic mutation reported to date. MEIS2 is known to be associated with cleft palate, intellectual disability, heart defects, and dysmorphic features. Our clinical report suggests that this gene may also have a role in cranial morphogenesis in humans, as previously observed in animal models.     

以pMSEx-1作为共转染质粒观察人NF-IL6过量表达对NIH3T3细胞成瘤性的影响

我们曾以ｐＳＶ２ｎｅｏ作为共转染质粒观察到ＮＦＩＬ６具有转化基因活性。本文以ｐＭＥＳｘ１（含ｎｅｏ抗性基因）质粒作为共转染质粒，发现能表达有义ＮＦＩＬ６的ＮＩＨ３Ｔ３转染子，可同时出现转化形态的克隆和扁平形态的克隆，二者比例６∶４，且ＮＦＩＬ６的表达状态相似。我们提出，ＮＦＩＬ６在ＮＩＨ３Ｔ３细胞表现为转化基因活性时，作用方式具有随机性。本文还提出，ｐＳＶｎｅｏ可能是ＮＩＨ３Ｔ３细胞内在不稳定性的促进因素     

Germline and somatic NF1 mutations in sporadic and NF1‐associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNSTs) are a malignancy occurring with increased frequency in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). In contrast to the well‐known spectrum of germline NF1 mutations, the information on somatic mutations in MPNSTs is limited. In this study, we screened NF1, KRAS, and BRAF in 47 MPNSTs from patients with (n = 25) and without (n = 22) NF1. In addition, DNA from peripheral blood and cutaneous neurofibroma biopsies from, respectively, 14/25 and 7/25 of the NF1 patients were analysed. Germline NF1 mutations were detected in ten NF1 patients, including three frameshift, three nonsense, one missense, one splicing alteration, and two large deletions. Somatic NF1 mutations were found in 10/25 (40%) NF1‐associated MPNSTs, in 3/7 (43%) neurofibromas, and in 9/22 (41%) sporadic MPNSTs. Large genomic copy number changes accounted for 6/10 and 7/13 somatic mutations in NF1‐associated and sporadic MPNSTs, respectively. Two NF1‐associated and 13 sporadic MPNSTs did not show any NF1 mutation. A major role of the KRAS and BRAF genes was ruled out. The spectrum of germline NF1 mutations in neurofibromatosis patients with MPNST is different from the spectrum of somatic mutations seen in MPNSTs. However, the somatic events share common characteristics with the NF1‐related and the sporadic tumours. Copyright © 2008 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

NF1 microdeletions in neurofibromatosis type 1: from genotype to phenotype

In 5‐10% of patients, neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) results from microdeletions that encompass the entire NF1 gene and a variable number of flanking genes. Two recurrent microdeletion types are found in most cases, with microdeletion breakpoints located in paralogous regions flanking NF1 (proximal NF1‐REP‐a and distal NF1‐REP–c for the 1.4 Mb type‐1 microdeletion, and SUZ12 and SUZ12P for the 1.2 Mb type‐2 microdeletion). A more severe phenotype is usually associated with NF1 microdeletion patients than in those with intragenic mutations. We characterized NF1 microdeletions in 70 unrelated NF1 microdeleted patients using a high‐resolution NF1 custom array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Genotype‐phenotype correlations were studied in 58 of these microdeletion patients and compared to 389 patients with intragenic truncating NF1 mutations and phenotyped in the same standardized way. Our results confirmed in an unbiased manner the existence of a contiguous gene syndrome with a significantly higher incidence of learning disabilities and facial dysmorphism in microdeleted patients compared to patients with intragenic NF1 mutations. Microdeleted NF1 patients also showed a trend toward significance for childhood overgrowth. High‐resolution array‐CGH identified a new recurrent ～1.0 Mb microdeletion type, designated as type‐3, with breakpoints in the paralogous regions middle NF1‐REP‐b and distal NF1‐REP–c. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

NF1 gene analysis based on DHPLC

The high mutation rate at the NF1 locus results in a wide range of molecular abnormalities. The majority of these mutations are private and rare, generating elevated allelic diversity with a restricted number of recurrent mutations. In this study, we have assessed the efficacy of denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC), for detecting mutation in the NF1 gene. DHPLC is a fast and highly sensitive technique based on the detection of heteroduplexes in PCR products by ion pair reverse-phase HPLC under partially denaturing conditions. We established theoretical conditions for DHPLC analysis of all coding exons and splice junctions of the NF1 gene using the WAVEmaker software version 4.1.40 and screened for mutations a panel of 40 unrelated NF1 patients (25 sporadic and 15 familial), genetically uncharacterized. Disruptive mutations were identified in 29 individuals with an overall mutation detection rate of 72.5%. The mutations included eight deletions (exons 4b, 7, 10a, 14, 26, and 31), one insertion (exon 8), nine nonsense mutation (exons 10a, 13, 23.1, 27a, 29, 31, and 36), six missense mutations (exons 15, 16, 17, 24, and 31), four splice errors (exons 11, 14, 36, and 40) and a complex rearrangement within exon 16. Eighteen (62%) of the identified disruptive mutations are novel. Seven unclassified and three previously reported polymorphisms were also detected. None of the missense mutations identified in this study were found after screening of 150 controls. Our results suggest that DHPLC provides an accurate method for the rapid identification of NF1 mutations.     

Analysis of NF1 gene mutations in two sporadic patients with neurofibromatosis type 1CSCD

Objective: To detect mutations of the NF1 gene in two sporadic cases with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and explore their molecular mechanisms. Methods: Clinical data of the two patients was collected. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples. Specific primers were designed to exclude pseudogenes. PCR was performed to amplify all coding exons of the NF1 gene. PCR products were directly sequenced. Results: Two novel mutations of the NF1 gene (c. 1019-1020delCT in exon 9 and c. 7189G> A in exon 48) were respectively identified in the two patients but not among their unaffected parents or 100 healthy controls. Conclusion: Mutations of the NF1 gene may have predisposed to the NF1 in the two patients. © 2018 MeDitorial Ltd. All rights reserved.     

Identification of Large NF1 Duplications Reciprocal to NAHR‐Mediated Type‐1 NF1 Deletions

Approximately 5% of all patients with neurofibromatosis type‐1 (NF1) exhibit large deletions of the NF1 gene region. To date, only nine unrelated cases of large NF1 duplications have been reported, with none of the affected patients exhibiting multiple café au lait spots (CALS), Lisch nodules, freckling, or neurofibromas, the hallmark signs of NF1. Here, we have characterized two novel NF1 duplications, one sporadic and one familial. Both index patients with NF1 duplications exhibited learning disabilities and atypical CALS. Additionally, patient R609021 had Lisch nodules, whereas patient R653070 exhibited two inguinal freckles. The mother and sister of patient R609021 also harbored the NF1 duplication and exhibited cognitive dysfunction but no CALS. The breakpoints of the nine NF1 duplications reported previously have not been identified and hence their underlying generative mechanisms have remained unclear. In this study, we performed high‐resolution breakpoint analysis that indicated that the two duplications studied were mediated by nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) and that the duplication breakpoints were located within the NAHR hotspot paralogous recombination site 2 (PRS2), which also harbors the type‐1 NF1 deletion breakpoints. Hence, our study indicates for the first time that NF1 duplications are reciprocal to type‐1 NF1 deletions and originate from the same NAHR events.     

Ten novel mutations in the human neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) gene in Italian patients

The entire NF1 coding region was analyzed for mutations in a panel of 108 unrelated Italian NF1 patients. Using PTT, SSCP, and DNA sequencing, we found 10 mutations which have never been reported before. Clinical diagnosis of NF1 was established according to the NIH consensus criteria in 100 individuals, while 8 were young children with only multiple cafè-au-lait spots. We detected 46 truncated fragments, and 24 of them were fully characterized by SSCP and direct sequencing. Of the 24, 14 were known mutations (R304X, R681X, Q682X, R1306X, R1362X, R1513X, R1748X, Q1794X, R1947X, Y2264X, R2237X, 2674delA, 6789delTTAC, 2027insC). The other 10 mutations represent novel changes that contribute to the germline mutational spectrum of the NF1 gene (K810X, Q2595X, 6772delT, 7190delCT, 7331delA, 1021insTT, 3921insT, 4106insTA, 7149insC, 2033insCG / 2034delA). PTT in a large number of Italian NF1 patients supports the usefulness of this method for characterization of mutations in disorders where the responsible gene is very large and the disease-causing mutations often create a stop codon. In agreement with previous reports, no mutational hotspots within the NF1 gene were detected.     

Constitutional LZTR1 mutation presenting with a unilateral vestibular schwannoma in a teenager

Schwannomatosis is a rare neurofibromatosis clinically diagnosed by age‐dependent criteria, with bilateral vestibular schwannoma and/or a constitutional NF2 mutation representing exclusion criteria. Following SMARCB1 germline mutations, constitutional mutations in LZTR1 were discovered. We report on the molecular investigation in a patient presenting at 14 years with a unilateral vestibular schwannoma, ultimately causing blindness and unilateral hearing loss, in the absence of other schwannomas or a positive family history. In DNA derived from frozen tumor tissue, a comprehensive NF2, SMARCB1 and LZTR1 analysis showed an NF2 truncating mutation c.1006_1021delins16; an LZTR1 mutation c.791+1G>A; and a partial 22q deletion including NF2, SMARCB1 and LZTR1. Sequence analysis on peripheral blood derived DNA showed the LZTR1 mutation to be constitutional, but the NF2 mutation and partial 22q deletion were not found, indicating them to be somatic events. RNA‐based targeted analysis confirmed missplicing of LZTR1 intron 8, predicted to result in a premature stop codon. This LZTR1 mutation was paternally inherited. While isolated vestibular schwannoma or NF2 may be considered in a young individual with a unilateral vestibular schwannoma, this report suggests that LZTR1 ‐related schwannomatosis be added to this differential diagnosis.     

Evidence of a four-hit mechanism involving SMARCB1 and NF2 in schwannomatosis-associated schwannomas

Schwannomatosis is characterized by the onset of multiple intracranial, spinal, or peripheral schwannomas, without involvement of the vestibular nerve, which is instead pathognomonic of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2). Recently, a schwannomatosis family with a germline mutation of the SMARCB1 gene on chromosome 22 has been described. We report on the molecular analysis of the SMARCB1 and NF2 genes in a series of 21 patients with schwannomatosis and in eight schwannomatosis-associated tumors from four different patients. A novel germline SMARCB1 mutation was found in one patient; inactivating somatic mutations of NF2, associated with loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of 22q, were found in two schwannomas of this patient. This is the second report of a germline SMARCB1 mutation in patients affected by schwannomatosis and the first report of SMARCB1 mutations associated with somatic NF2 mutations in schwannomatosis-associated tumors. The latter observation suggests that a four-hit mechanism involving the SMARCB1 and NF2 genes may be implicated in schwannomatosis-related tumorigenesis.     

Two independent mutations in a family with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)

We report on two independent alterations of the NF1 gene in a three-generation kindred with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Using temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) in a mutation analysis of exon 31 of the NF1 gene we detected the previously reported nonsense mutation R1947X. This C-to-T transition at codon 1947 in exon 31 is considered to represent a mutation "hot spot" of the NF1 gene due to 5mCpG deamination. All living family members together with their genomic DNA were included in this investigation. However, the mutation R1947X was absent from two undoubtedly affected siblings of the propositus. Another NF1 mutation (889-2A-->G) was identified in the two sibs by the protein truncation test (PTT). The novel splice site mutation 889-2A-->G results in a skip of NF1 exon 7 during splicing and protein truncation due to frameshift. The two NF1 alterations are linked to different paternal haplotypes. In our study of a three-generation kindred, R1947X represents a de novo mutation whereas 889-2A-->G is an inherited splice mutation. Implications for phenotype variation are discussed.