Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of time-resolved three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the detection of renal artery stenosis in comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography as the standard of reference. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients (age range, 25-81 years; mean, 62.9 +/- 11.9 years) with suspected renal artery stenosis underwent intraarterial digital subtraction angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, performed on a 1.5-T system with fast low-angle shot three-dimensional imaging (3.8/1.49 [TR/TE], 25 degrees flip angle, 10-sec acquisition time, and 1.5-mm partition thickness). Three time-resolved phases were obtained in a single breath-hold. Digital subtraction angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography were evaluated by four observers who studied 80 main renal arteries and 19 accessory vessels to evaluate the degree of stenosis. A stenosis reducing the intraarterial diameter by more than 50% was regarded as hemodynamically significant. Interobserver variability was calculated. RESULTS: Only one gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography study was not of diagnostic quality, as a result of failure of the power injector. All main branches were of diagnostic quality in 38 (97.4%) of the remaining 39 gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography studies. Seventeen (89.5%) of 19 accessory renal arteries were depicted with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. The overall sensitivity for significant stenoses was 92.9%. The overall specificity was 83.4%, and the overall accuracy was 85.9%. Interobserver variability of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography exceeded that of digital subtraction angiography. CONCLUSION: Time-resolved three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is a useful noninvasive method of screening suspected renal artery stenosis because of its easy application, short examination time, and high sensitivity despite of its higher interobserver variability.     

High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, performed with an integrated parallel acquisition technique for high isotropic spatial resolution, with selective digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and intravascular ultrasonography (US) for accuracy of diameter and area measurements in renal artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board, and consent was obtained from all patients. Forty-five patients (17 women, 28 men; mean age, 62.2 years) were evaluated for suspected renal artery stenosis. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiograms were acquired with isotropic spatial resolution of 0.8 x 0.8 x 0.9 mm in 23-second breath-hold with an integrated parallel acquisition technique. In-plane diameter of stenosis was measured along vessel axis, and perpendicular diameter and area of stenosis were assessed in cross sections orthogonal to vessel axis, on multiplanar reformations. Interobserver agreement between two radiologists in measurements of in-plane and perpendicular diameters of stenosis and perpendicular area of stenosis was assessed with mean percentage of difference. In a subset of patients, degree of stenosis at MR angiography was compared with that at DSA (n = 20) and intravascular US (n = 11) by using Bland-Altman plots and correlation analyses. RESULTS: Mean percentage of difference in stenosis measurement was reduced from 39.3% +/- 78.4 (standard deviation) with use of in-plane views to 12.6% +/- 9.5 with use of cross-sectional views (P < .05). Interobserver agreement for stenosis grading based on perpendicular area of stenosis was significantly better than that for stenosis grading based on in-plane diameter of stenosis (mean percentage of difference, 15.2% +/- 24.2 vs 54.9% +/- 186.9; P < .001). Measurements of perpendicular area of stenosis on MR angiograms correlated well with those on intravascular US images (r(2) = 0.90). CONCLUSION: Evaluation of cross-sectional images reconstructed from high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR renal angiographic data increases the accuracy of the technique and decreases interobserver variability.     

Detection of renal artery stenosis: prospective comparison of captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography, captopril-enhanced scintigraphy, and MR angiography

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare the value of captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography, captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy, and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for detecting renal artery stenosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients with suspected renovascular hypertension were prospectively examined with captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography, captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, and catheter angiography. The sensitivity and specificity of each technique for detecting renal artery stenosis measuring 50% or greater and 70% or greater were compared using the McNemar test. Positive and negative predictive values were estimated for populations with 5% and 30% prevalence of renal artery stenosis. Kappa values for interobserver agreement were assessed for both gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and catheter angiography. RESULTS: For detecting renal artery stenosis measuring 50% or greater, the sensitivity of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (96.6%) was greater than that of captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography (69%, p = 0.005) and captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy (41.4%, p = 0.001). No significant difference in specificity was observed among modalities. For renal artery stenosis measuring 50% or greater, positive and negative predictive values were respectively 62% and 86% for captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography, 49% and 76% for captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy, and 53% and 98% for gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Interobserver agreement was high for both gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (kappa = 0.829) and catheter angiography (kappa = 0.729). CONCLUSION: Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is the most accurate noninvasive modality for detecting renal artery stenosis greater than or equal to 50%. The use of captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography in combination with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for identifying renal artery stenosis needs to be evaluated with a cost-effectiveness analysis.     

Renal MR angiography at 1.0 T: three-dimensional (3D) phase-contrast techniques versus gadolinium-enhanced 3D fast low-angle shot breath-hold imaging.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of three different MR angiographic techniques at 1.0 T. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In 22 patients with renal artery stenosis confirmed at intraarterial catheter angiography, we also performed unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography and gadolinium-enhanced single breath-hold three-dimensional fast low-angle shot MR angiography. We determined circulation time to optimize signal acquisition in gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography after bolus injection of contrast material. RESULTS: Sensitivity, defined as the detection of a hemodynamically significant stenosis (>50% luminal narrowing), was 85% for enhanced phase-contrast MR angiography, 91% for gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, and 95% for unenhanced phase-contrast MR angiography. The combination of unenhanced phase-contrast MR angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography yielded 100% sensitivity for hilar artery stenoses. There were 13 false-positive findings with unenhanced phase-contrast MR angiography, 10 with enhanced phase-contrast MR angiography, and four with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (specificity: 38%, 52%, and 79%, respectively). Accessory renal arteries were not seen on unenhanced or enhanced phase-contrast MR angiography (0/8 patients) but were detected with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in five of the eight patients. Interobserver agreement (kappa = .62) was best with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. The quality of the images was unsatisfactory for adequate evaluation of segmental renal arteries with all three MR angiographic techniques. CONCLUSION: A combination of unenhanced phase-contrast MR angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography at 1.0 T proved useful as a screening protocol for renal artery stenosis.     

Evaluation of dynamic gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate a three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography sequence using standard MR gradients in detecting renal artery stenosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients referred for angiography for suspected renal artery stenosis underwent both conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and MR angiography. MR angiography was performed on a 1.5-T scanner with standard gradients. A fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-echo sequence was used with the following parameters: TR/TE, 10.3/1.9; flip angle, 45 degrees; field of view, 36 x 32 cm; matrix size, 256 x 128; one excitation; volume thickness, 70 mm; and partitions, 28. Gadolinium was administered IV as a dynamic bolus of 30-40 ml. Conventional and MR angiographic images were interpreted by two radiologists in consensus. RESULTS: DSA revealed 87 renal arteries, of which 79 were in 35 patients with native kidneys and eight arteries were in seven patients with transplanted kidneys. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography showed 85 (98%) of 87 renal arteries. Seventeen patients had 20 significant (>50% stenosis) renal artery stenoses and five patients had five occluded renal arteries revealed by DSA. MR angiography revealed 85 renal arteries (98%), 20 stenoses (100%), and five occlusions (100%). Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography led to one false-positive interpretation for renal artery stenosis and no false-negative interpretations. Thus, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MR angiography for renal artery stenosis were 100%, 98%, and 99%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The MR angiography pulse sequence we used was an effective and reliable technique for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. The sequence can be performed on widely available MR equipment that does not require fast gradient hardware.     

Intraarterial MR angiography and DSA in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the accuracy of intraarterial magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in the depiction of significant stenoses and occlusions, with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) serving as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Approval of the local ethics committee and informed consent were obtained. Twenty patients (11 men; nine women; age range, 48-86 years; mean age, 69.5 years+/-11.2 [standard deviation]) with symptomatic peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) were prospectively enrolled. After percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), intraarterial MR angiography was performed in the thigh and the calf with a 1.5-T MR imager in two consecutive runs. Intraarterial MR angiography was performed with a low-dose injection protocol (ie, two 20-mL injections of a 50-mmol gadolinium-based contrast agent). Moderate stenoses (luminal narrowing50%) or vessel occlusions; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Intraarterial DSA revealed 78 moderate stenoses, 57 significant stenoses, and 28 occlusions. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of intraarterial MR angiography in the characterization of significant stenoses or occlusions were 92% (95% CI: 72%, 99%), 94% (95% CI: 82%, 98%), and 93%, respectively, in femoropopliteal arteries and 93% (95% CI: 83%, 98%), 71% (95% CI: 51%, 86%), and 86%, respectively, in infrapopliteal arteries. The main artifact observed with intraarterial MR angiography was venous contamination (12%). CONCLUSION: Intraarterial MR angiography is an accurate method used to depict significant stenoses and occlusions in lower extremity arteries with a low-dose injection protocol.     

Accuracy of normal-dose contrast-enhanced MR angiography in assessing renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries using a standard dose of gadolinium. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients suspected of having renal artery stenosis underwent MR angiography and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography, which was the method of reference. Three-dimensional gradient-echo MR subtraction angiography (TR/TE, 5.8/1.8 msec) was performed on a 1.5-T imager using a phased array body coil. Before imaging, a separate timing bolus sequence was used, administering 1.0 ml of contrast agent. Gadopentetate dimeglumine (15 ml) was injected using an MR power injector. Two observers, who were unaware of each other's interpretation and of MR findings, assessed digital subtraction angiography. Likewise, two other observers assessed MR angiography. RESULTS: Digital subtraction angiography depicted 75 main and 17 accessory renal arteries (n = 92). All main renal arteries and 13 accessory renal arteries were identified on MR angiography. Compared with digital subtraction angiography, MR imaging correctly classified 57 of 66 arteries without a hemodynamically significant stenosis (0-49%), 22 of 22 arteries as significantly stenotic (50-99%), and four of four occluded arteries; five stenoses were overestimated. There was one false-positive finding of an accessory renal artery on MR angiography that was identified retrospectively on digital subtraction angiography. Interobserver agreement was high. Sensitivity and specificity for grading significant stenosis were 100% and 85%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography, using +/-0.1 mmol/kg of gadolinium, is an accurate method in the assessment of renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries.     

Intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in humans for the detection of infrainguinal arterial stenoses before and after percutaneous angioplasty

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to show the feasibility of intraarterial MR angiography of the infrainguinal arteries and to compare the accuracy of intraarterial MR angiography with selective intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for the detection of stenoses before and after percutaneous balloon angioplasty. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients underwent digital subtraction angiography and intraarterial MR angiography before and after balloon angioplasty. For intraarterial MR angiography, 30 mL of diluted contrast agent (5 mL of gadodiamide diluted in 55 mL of 0.9% saline solution) was injected through a sheath in the superficial femoral artery using a flow rate of 2.5 mL/sec. A 3D gradient-echo sequence was performed. Four independent blinded observers assessed differences in the quantitative measurement of stenoses and localization of lesions between digital subtraction angiography and intraarterial MR angiography. The overall impression of the intraarterial MR angiography images was documented on a 4-point scale (1 = excellent, 4 = poor). Interobserver variability was calculated. RESULTS: Intraarterial MR angiography from the upper leg to the trifurcation was feasible in all 30 examinations with a mean overall impression of all segments of 1.3 (SD, 0.68). For the detection of significant stenoses (> or = 50% stenosis), the overall sensitivity and specificity for the femoropopliteal and crural vessels were 92.4% and 91.7% and 91.9% and 87.8%, respectively. For the complete leg, sensitivity and specificity were 92.2% and 88.6%, respectively. Interobserver variability for intraarterial MR angiography of the crural vessels exceeded that of the femoropopliteal arteries. CONCLUSION: Intraarterial MR angiography of the infrainguinal arteries is feasible in humans using injections of diluted contrast agent at concentrations as low as 8%. It has a high sensitivity for detecting stenoses and an acceptable interobserver variability.     

Validation of injection parameters for catheter-directed intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Catheter-directed intraarterial (IA) injections of gadolinium contrast agents may be used during endovascular interventions with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging guidance. Injection protocols require further validation. Using a flow phantom and swine, the authors aimed to (a) measure the optimal arterial gadolinium concentration ([Gd]) required for MR angiography and (b) validate a proposed IA injection protocol for gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For in vitro experiments, the authors placed a catheter in the aorta of an aorto-renal-iliac flow phantom. Injected [Gd], injection rates, and aortic blood flow rates were varied independently for 36 separate IA gadolinium injections. The authors performed 2D and 3D MR angiography with a fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence. For subsequent in vivo experiments, they selectively placed catheters within the aorta, renal artery, or common iliac artery of three pigs. Injection rate and injected [Gd] were varied. The authors performed 32 separate IA gadolinium injections for 2D MR angiography. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were compared for the various combinations of injection rate and injected [Gd]. RESULTS: In vitro, an arterial [Gd] of 2%-4% produced an optimal SNR for 2D MR angiography, and 3%-5% was best for 3D MR angiography. In swine, an arterial [Gd] of 1%-4% produced an optimal SNR. In the phantom and swine experiments, SNR was maintained at higher injection rates by inversely varying the injected [Gd]. CONCLUSION: Dilute arterial [Gd] is required for optimal IA gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. To maintain an optimal SNR, injection rates and injected [Gd] should be varied inversely. The postulated injection protocol was validated.     

Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with conventional angiography versus gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography

PURPOSE: To evaluate the interobserver and intermodality variability of conventional angiography and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in the assessment of renal artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients underwent conventional angiography and gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional gradient-echo MR angiography. Three angiographers blinded to each other's interpretations and the MR angiographic findings assessed the conventional angiograms for renal artery stenosis. Similarly, three blinded MR imagers evaluated the MR angiograms. RESULTS: Interobserver variability for the degree of renal artery stenosis in the 107 kidneys evaluated was not significantly different between the two modalities. The mean SD of the degree of stenosis was 6.9% at MR angiography versus 7.5% at conventional angiography (alpha < or = .05, P > .05). In 70 kidneys (65%), the average degree of stenosis reported by the readers for the two modalities differed by 10% or less. In 22 cases (21%), the degree of stenosis was overestimated with MR angiography by more than 10% relative to the results of conventional angiography. In 15 cases (14%), the degree of stenosis was underestimated with MR angiography by more than 10%. CONCLUSION: Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography permits evaluation of renal artery stenosis with an interobserver variability comparable with that of conventional angiography.     

Renal arterial stenosis: prospective comparison of color Doppler US and breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography

PURPOSE: To compare color Doppler ultrasonography (US) with fast, breath-hold, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in detecting renal arterial stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with clinical suspicion of renovascular disease were prospectively examined with intra- and extrarenal color Doppler US and breath-hold, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Digital subtraction arteriography (DSA) was the standard of reference in all patients for the number of renal arteries and degree of stenosis. RESULTS: DSA depicted 103 arteries and 52 stenoses. Color Doppler US was nondiagnostic in two examinations. Significantly more of 13 accessory renal arteries were detected with MR angiography (n = 12) than with color Doppler US (n = 3; P <.05). For assessing all stenoses, the sensitivity and accuracy were 94% and 91%, respectively, for MR angiography and 71% and 76%, respectively, for US (P <.05). The sensitivity was higher for MR angiography (100%) than for US (79%; P <.05) in diagnosing stenoses with at least 50% narrowing. The specificity, accuracy, and negative predictive value in diagnosing stenoses of at least 50% narrowing were 93%, 95%, and 100% for MR angiography and 93%, 89%, and 90% for US. CONCLUSION: Breath-hold, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is superior to color Doppler US in accessory renal artery detection. Although the specificity of MR angiography is similar to that of color Doppler US, MR angiography has a better sensitivity and negative predictive value in depicting renal arterial stenoses.     

MR imaging assessment of changes in renal function with renal artery stent placement in swine

PURPOSE: To prospectively test the hypothesis that magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can detect changes in renal function at the time of renal artery stent placement in a swine model of renal artery stenosis (RAS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this animal care and use committee-approved study, hemodynamically significant (>50%) RAS was surgically induced in six pigs. MR imaging was employed for assessment of the anatomic and physiologic changes induced by fluoroscopically guided stent placement. With MR imaging, we assessed changes in renal blood flow (RBF), extraction fraction (EF), and single-kidney glomerular filtration rate (skGFR) during the procedure. Arterial diameter stenosis before and after stent placement was assessed with x-ray digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Mean changes in functional and anatomic parameters were compared with the Wilcoxon matched-pairs test, with an alpha level of 0.05. RESULTS: There was no significant change in mean RBF after stent deployment (P=.44). Mean EF increased from 0.19+/-0.08 before stent placement to 0.31+/-0.17 after stent placement (P=.16). Mean skGFR measurements were 25 mL/min+/-16 before stent placement and 41 mL/min+/-28 after stent placement (P<.05). According to x-ray DSA measurements, mean stenosis measurements were 60%+/-12% before stent placement and 24%+/-16% after stent placement (P<.02). CONCLUSIONS: In swine, MR imaging can detect immediate changes in renal function after radiographically guided stent placement for unilateral RAS. This functional MR technique may have applications in the setting of hybrid MR/x-ray DSA procedure suites.     

Comparison of intraarterial MR angiography at 3.0 T with X-ray digital subtraction angiography for detection of renal artery stenosis in swine

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of catheter-directed intraarterial (IA) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography at 3.0 T with that of x-ray digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for the measurement of renal artery stenosis (RAS) in swine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Unilateral hemodynamically significant RAS (>50%) was induced surgically in six pigs with use of reverse cable ties. One to two weeks after surgery, each pig underwent x-ray DSA and MR angiography before and after percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA). X-ray DSA was performed before and after PTA of RAS by injection of iodinated contrast agent through a 5-F multiple-side hole angiographic catheter placed in the abdominal aorta under fluoroscopic guidance. MR angiography of RAS was performed before and after PTA of RAS on a 3.0-T clinical MR imager with use of gadolinium-based contrast agent. MR angiography and DSA images were analyzed with the full width at half maximum method. Percent stenosis measurements between x-ray DSA and MR angiography were compared with a paired t test and were correlated with linear regression and Bland Altman analysis (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: Six cases of RAS were induced and imaged successfully with DSA and MR angiography techniques before and after PTA. On x-ray DSA, median stenoses was 64% (95% CI 57%-80%) before PTA and 20% (95% CI 5%-32%) after PTA. Corresponding MR angiography median stenosis measurement was 69% (95% CI 58%-80%) before PTA and 26% (95% CI 16%-36%) after PTA. A paired t test comparison did not show a difference between DSA and MR angiography (P = .16). RAS measurements on MR angiography correlated closely (P < .01) with DSA measurements (r(2) = 0.92). CONCLUSION: In swine, the accuracy of catheter-directed IA MR angiography with use of a clinical 3.0-T MR imaging unit for the measurement of RAS was similar to that of conventional x-ray DSA.     

Using gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography to assess arterial inflow stenosis after kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate use of gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) MR angiography in the assessment of suspected arterial inflow stenosis after kidney transplantation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive patients receiving kidney transplants (26 single-kidney transplants and two en block transplants) with suspected arterial inflow stenosis were examined with two MR angiography sequences: gadolinium-enhanced 3D fast spoiled gradient-recalled (SPGR) imaging and 3D phase-contrast imaging. Twenty-four of these patients then were examined using the gold standards: either digital subtraction angiography (DSA) (n = 23) or surgery (n = 1). MR angiography and DSA studies were independently and prospectively analyzed for the presence of arterial stenoses (mild [<50%], severe [50-90%], or critical [>90%]) in the iliac, anastomotic, and renal artery segments. Two independent observers retrospectively evaluated the MR angiography sequences for ability to detect or exclude significant (> or = 50%) arterial stenoses. RESULTS: In 22 single-kidney transplants, DSA showed eight significant stenoses in 66 arterial segments. MR angiograms adequately showed 66 of 66 segments (prospective observers) and 64 of 66 segments (each retrospective observer), which were subsequently evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of MR angiography in revealing significant stenoses were 100% and 98% (prospective analysis), 88% and 98% (retrospective observer 1), and 86% and 100% (retrospective observer 2). Concordance between observers showed kappa values exceeding .85 for all comparisons except the analysis of phase-contrast series (kappa = .62). In one en block transplant, DSA showed that stenosis was greater than 90%, although it had been graded at less than 50% with MR angiography. CONCLUSION: Gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography accurately evaluated arterial inflow in single-kidney transplants.     

Intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced 2D and 3D MR angiography: a preliminary study

PURPOSE: To evaluate, in phantom and canine models, intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The in vitro experiments examined gadodiamide solutions ranging in gadolinium (Gd) concentration from 0.1% to 100%. A spoiled gradient-recalled echo (SPGR) sequence was used with various repetition time/echo time (TR/TE) parameters. Signal was measured to determine which concentration yielded the highest signal. For in vivo experiments, pigtail catheters were placed in the abdominal aortae of two dogs. Intraarterial injections of 20-30 mL of 0.5%-25% Gd solutions were performed. We acquired images with use of 2D and 3D SPGR techniques. Depiction of the abdominal aortae and renal vessels was assessed qualitatively and quantitatively. RESULTS: Phantom experiments demonstrated that a 2%-6% solution of Gd produced the highest MR signal, depending on the imaging parameters. In the canine model, a 2% Gd solution was best for 2D techniques, whereas 7%-14% Gd solutions were optimal for 3D techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Intraarterial contrast material-enhanced 2D and 3D MRA can be successfully implemented with use of dilute Gd. Dilution permits the administration of more intraarterial injections per day, without exceeding the dose limit, compared with intravenous Gd-enhanced MRA. Intraarterial injections also limit scan synchronization and contrast material dispersion issues. This technique may have application in MR-guided endovascular procedures.     

Comparison of digital subtraction angiography with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is a treatable cause of hypertension and renal failure for which no ideal screening technique is currently available. We evaluated the use of dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for the diagnosis of RAS. Sixty-two patients with secondary hypertension were enrolled in the study. All patients had conventional renal angiography and gadolinium enhanced MRA. The sequence used was a 3D FMP SPGR sequence with the following parameters (TR: 26 ms, TE: 6.9 ms, flip angle 40 °, field of view 36 × 36 cm, matrix 246 × 256, 1 excitation). Gadolinium 0.3 mmol/kg was administered and 60 1.5-mm-thick partitions were obtained over a duration of 3.5 min. The MRA images were then compared with conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images. Conventional DSA demonstrated 138 renal arteries, whereas gadolinium-enhanced MRA demonstrated 129 (93 %). Twenty-one renal artery stenoses and four occluded arteries were seen at conventional DSA. Gadolinium-enhanced MRA had a sensitivity of 88 %, specificity of 98 %, accuracy of 96 %, positive predictive value of 92 % and negative predictive value of 97 % when compared with conventional DSA. Gadolinium-enhanced MRA is an accurate technique for identifying patients with RAS. It is less sensitive in picking up accessory renal arteries. Received: 17 March 1998; Revision received: 30 June 1998; Accepted: 28 August 1998     

Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading

PURPOSE: To compare three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and rotational angiography for depiction of stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study had Ethics Committee approval, and each patient gave written informed consent. Forty-nine patients (18 women, mean age, 67.2 years +/- 9.1 [+/- standard deviation], and 31 men, mean age, 63.1 years +/- 8.0) with symptomatic stenosis of internal carotid artery (ICA) diagnosed at duplex ultrasonography underwent transverse 3D TOF MR angiography with sliding interleaved kY acquisition and coronal contrast-enhanced MR angiography, followed by DSA and rotational angiography within 48 hours. MR angiography was performed at 1.5-T with a cervical coil. Contrast-enhanced MR angiograms were obtained after a bolus injection of 20 mL of gadobenate dimeglumine. Maximum ICA stenosis on maximum intensity projection and source images was quantified according to NASCET criteria. Correlations for 3D TOF MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, DSA, and rotational angiography were determined by means of cross tabulation, and accuracy for detection and grading of stenoses were calculated. Data were evaluated with analysis of variance, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and McNemar test, all at significance of P < .05. RESULTS: Ninety-eight ICAs were evaluated at contrast-enhanced MR angiography, DSA, and rotational angiography, and 97 were evaluated at 3D TOF MR angiography. Correlations for contrast-enhanced MR angiography, 3D TOF MR angiography, and DSA relative to rotational angiography were r2 = 0.9332, r2 = 0.9048, and r2 = 0.9255, respectively. Lower correlation (r2 = 0.8593) was noted for contrast-enhanced MR angiography and DSA. Respective sensitivity and specificity for detection of hemodynamically relevant stenosis relative to rotational angiography were 100% and 90% for contrast-enhanced MR angiography, 95.5% and 87.2% for 3D TOF MR angiography, and 88.6% and 100% for DSA. Four of 31 severe stenoses were underestimated at DSA, and three were underestimated at contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Three severe stenoses were underestimated at 3D TOF MR angiography, and one was misclassified as occluded. Of 13 moderate (50%-69%) stenoses, one was overestimated at contrast-enhanced MR angiography, two were underestimated and three overestimated at 3D TOF MR angiography, and two were underestimated at DSA. CONCLUSION: DSA results in an underestimation of ICA stenosis compared with rotational angiography. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography correlates best with rotational angiography.     

Peripheral arterial disease: comparison of color duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracies of color duplex ultrasonography (US) and contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and to assess interobserver agreement regarding contrast-enhanced MR angiographic findings in patients suspected of having peripheral arterial disease (PAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved the study, and all patients provided signed informed consent. Two hundred ninety-five patients referred for diagnostic and preinterventional work-up of PAD with duplex US also underwent gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Data sets were reviewed for presence or absence of 50% or greater luminal reduction, which indicated hemodynamically significant stenosis, and to determine interobserver agreement. At duplex US, a peak systolic velocity ratio of 2.5 or greater indicated significant stenosis. Primary outcome measures were differences between duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography in sensitivity and specificity for detection of significant stenosis, as assessed with the McNemar test, and interobserver agreement between the two contrast-enhanced MR angiogram readings, expressed as quadratic weighted kappa values. Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was the reference standard. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-nine patients had at least one hemodynamically significant stenotic lesion at contrast-enhanced MR angiography, duplex US, or both examinations. One hundred fifty-two patients underwent intraarterial DSA. The quadratic weighted kappa for agreement regarding the presence of 50% or greater stenosis at contrast-enhanced MR angiography was 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87, 0.91). Sensitivity of duplex US was 76% (95% CI: 69%, 82%); specificity, 93% (95% CI: 91%, 95%); and accuracy, 89%. Sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced MR angiography were 84% (95% CI: 78%, 89%) and 97% (95% CI: 95%, 98%), respectively; accuracy was 94%. Sensitivity (P = .002) and specificity (P = .03) of contrast-enhanced MR angiography were significantly higher. CONCLUSION: Results of this prospective comparison between contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex US provide evidence that contrast-enhanced MR angiography is more sensitive and specific for diagnosis and preinterventional work-up of PAD.     

Assessment of gadolinium-enhanced time-resolved three-dimensional MR angiography for evaluating renal artery stenosis

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the image quality of gadolinium-enhanced time-resolved three-dimensional (3D) MR angiography and to evaluate its accuracy in revealing renal artery stenosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients underwent MR angiography using an ultrafast 3D Fourier transform spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state (TR/TE range, 2.6/0.7--0.8). Five seconds after administration of 15--20 mL gadodiamide hydrate, four or five consecutive data sets with imaging times of 7.0--7.6 sec were acquired during a single breath-hold. A timing examination was not performed. Image quality was assessed using quantitative analysis (signal-to-noise, contrast-to-noise, and venous-to-arterial enhancement ratios) and qualitative analysis (presence of venous overlap, presence of artifacts, and degree of renal arterial enhancement). MR angiography depiction of the renal artery stenosis was evaluated using conventional angiography as the standard of reference. RESULTS: On the best arterial phase, average aortic signal-to-noise ratio (+/-SD) was 74.5 +/- 24.4, aorta-to--inferior vena cava contrast-to-noise ratio was 70.8 +/- 23.4, and inferior vena cava--to-aorta venous-to-arterial enhancement ratio was 0.03 +/- 0.04. No venous overlap was seen in 38 of 39 patients. Substantial enhancement of renal arteries was seen in all patients without any noticeable artifacts. MR angiography correctly depicted the degree of stenosis in 44 of 47 normal arteries, 13 of 16 mildly stenotic arteries, five of five moderately stenotic arteries, three of four severely stenotic arteries, and one of one occluded artery. Sensitivity and specificity for revealing greater than 50% stenosis was 100%. CONCLUSION: Time-resolved 3D MR angiography can provide high-quality arteriograms. Its performance in revealing renal artery stenosis is comparable with that of conventional angiography.     

Assessment of renal artery stenosis: comparison of captopril renography and gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography

AIM: To determine the accuracy of captopril renography (CR) and gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in the diagnosis of 50-99% renal artery stenosis (RAS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients with possible RAS, of whom 53% had renal function impairment (creatinine >130 micromol/l), were included.(99m)Tc-mercaptoacetyl triglycine (MAG(3)) renography was performed after an oral dose of 25 mg captopril. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography was performed on a standard 1.5 Tesla system: TR 13.5, TE 3.5, flip angle 60 degrees, matrix 195 x 512. Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was the standard of reference. RESULTS: Captropril renography accurately categorized 22 of 26 patients who had either uni- or bilateral RAS of 50-99%. The sensitivity and specificity of CR for the detection of 50-99% stenosis were 85 and 71%, respectively. With MR angiography one occluded artery was incorrectly diagnosed as a stenosis. Sensitivity and specificity were 100 and 94%, respectively. The difference between the accuracies of MR angiography and CR was statistically significant (P = 0.02). The accuracy of CR was lower in patients with renal impairment (70%) than in those with normal renal function (90%).CONCLUSION: MR angiography showed a high accuracy in diagnosing RAS of between 50 and 99%. CR was less accurate than MR angiography, especially in patients with renal function impairment. In patients with normal renal function, however, CR remains a useful diagnostic test.