Efficacy and safety of intra-articular injection of mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective:To evaluate the effects and safety of intra-articular injection of mesenchymal stem cells on patients with knee osteoarthritis by a systematic review and meta-analysis.Methods:PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were retrieved. An assessment of the risk of bias was done through the Cochrane Collaborative Bias Risk Tool, publication bias was assessed by plotting funnel plots and Egger tests. Pain and functional improvements in patients with knee osteoarthritis were determined by changes in VAS scores and WOMAC scores at baseline and follow-up endpoints. For the evaluation of MRI, the WORMS score and changes in cartilage volume were used. In addition, the number of adverse events in the intervention group and the control group were counted to explore the safety.Results:A total of 10 randomized controlled trials involving 335 patients were included. In the pooled analysis, compared with the control groups, the VAS scores of MSC groups decreased significantly (MD,−19.24; 95% CI: −26.31 to −12.18, P < .00001. All of the WOMAC scores also improved significantly: the total scores (SMD, − 0.66; 95% CI: − 1.09 to −0.23, P = .003), pain scores (SMD, − 0.46; 95% CI: − 0.75 to −0.17, P = .002), stiffness scores (SMD, −0.32; 95% CI: −0.64 to 0.00 P = 0.05), and functional scores (SMD, −0.36; 95% CI: −0.69 to −0.04, P = .03). Two studies with non-double-blind designs were the main source of heterogeneity. In terms of cartilage repair, there was no significant difference in the WORMS score, but there was a significant increase in cartilage volume in the MSC group (SMD, 0.69; 95% CI: 0.25 to 1.13, P = .002). The proportion of patients with adverse events in the MSCs treatment group was significantly higher than that in the control group (OR, 3.20; 95% CI: 1.50 to 6.83, P = .003).Conclusions:Intra-articular injection of mesenchymal stem cells is effective and safety to relieve pain and improve motor function of patients with knee osteoarthritis in a short term which is different to conclusions of previous study.     

Effects of atorvastatin on the insulin resistance in women of polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Atorvastatin treatment has been suggested as a therapeutic method for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in many clinical studies. Nonetheless, the effects of atorvastatin on insulin resistance in PCOS patients still remain controversial.Objective:The aim of this report was to evaluate the effects of atorvastatin therapy on the insulin resistance in the treatment of PCOS compared to that of placebo, in order to confer a reference for clinical practice.Methods:Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of atorvastatin for PCOS published up to August, 2020 were searched. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated, and heterogeneity was measured by the I² test. Sensitivity analysis was also carried out. The outcomes of interest were as follows: fasting glucose concentration, fasting insulin level, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) or body mass index (BMI) value.Results:Nine RCTs with 406 participants were included. The difference of fasting glucose concentration in PCOS patients between atorvastatin group and placebo group was not statistically significant (8 trials; SMD −0.06, 95% CI −0.31 to 0.20, P = .66). PCOS patients in atorvastatin group had lower fasting insulin level than those in placebo group (7 trials; SMD −1.84, 95% CI −3.06 to −0.62, P < .003). The homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) value showed significant decrease in the atorvastatin therapy compared to placebo (6 trials; SMD −4.12, 95% CI −6.00 to −2.23, P < .0001). In contrast to placebo, atorvastatin therapy did not decrease the BMI value significantly in PCOS patients (7 trials; SMD 0.12, 95% CI −0.07 to 0.31, P = .22).Conclusions:Atorvastatin therapy can reduce insulin resistance in the treatment of patients with PCOS. In addition, further large-sample, multi-center RCTs are needed to identify these findings.     

Effectiveness of empowerment-based intervention on HbA1c and self-efficacy among cases with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective:The aim of this study was to determine the effect of empowerment-based interventions on glucose metabolism control and psychosocial self-efficacy in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Methods:The Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science electronic databases were searched up to 22 February 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effectiveness of empowerment-based intervention versus conventional treatment in type 2 diabetes cases. At least two investigators independently screened the literature, extracted data and evaluated the methodological quality. We calculated the pooled effect size using the mean difference (MD) or standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) through RevMan V 5.4.1.Results:Fifteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible for inclusion in the present study. A total of 2344 adults (1128 in the intervention groups and 1216 in the control) were covered. Five of these studies involved 671 cases of psychosocial self-efficacy, and 4 studies included 622 cases of diabetes knowledge. The meta-analysis showed that compared to routine care, empowerment-based intervention was associated with reduced glycated hemoglobin levels (SMD −0.20; 95% CI −0.31 to −0.08; Z = 3.40, P < .001, I² = 42%), increased diabetes empowerment scores (SMD 0.24; 95% CI 0.10–0.37; Z = 3.42, P < .001, I² = 0%), and increased diabetes knowledge scores (SMD 0.96; 95% CI 0.55–1.36; Z = 4.61, P < .001, I² = 80%).Conclusions:Empowerment-based intervention in adults with T2DM results in improvements in glycated hemoglobin, psychosocial self-efficacy and diabetes knowledge.     

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Fails to Benefit Pediatric Patients Undergoing Congenital Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been proven to reduce the ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, its effect on children receiving congenital cardiac surgery (CCS) was inconsistent. We therefore performed the current meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to comprehensively evaluate the effect of RIPC in pediatric patients undergoing CCS.PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched to identify RCTs assessing the effect of RIPC in pediatric patients undergoing CCS. The outcomes included the duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, postoperative cardiac troponin (cTnI) level, hospital length of stay (HLOS), postoperative inotropic score, and mortality. Subgroup and sensitivity analysis were also performed as predesigned. The meta-analysis was performed with random-effects model despite of heterogeneity. Sensitivity and subgroup analysis were predesigned to identify the robustness of the pooled estimate.Nine RCTs with 697 pediatric patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, RIPC failed to alter clinical outcomes of duration of MV (standard mean difference [SMD] −0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.23–0.17), ICU length of stay (SMD −0.22, 95% CI −0.47–0.04), or HLOS (SMD −0.14, 95% CI −0.55–0.26). Additionally, RIPC could not reduce postoperative cTnI (at 4–6 hours: SMD −0.25, 95% CI −0.73–0.23; P = 0.311; at 20–24 hours: SMD 0.09, 95% CI −0.51–0.68; P = 0.778) or postoperative inotropic score (at 4–6 hours: SMD −0.19, 95% CI −0.51–0.14; P = 0.264; at 24 hours: SMD −0.15, 95% CI −0.49–0.18; P = 0.365).RIPC may have no beneficial effects in children undergoing CCS. However, this finding should be interpreted with caution because of heterogeneity and large-scale RCTs are still needed.     

Efficacy and safety of sacubitril-valsartan in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials: A PRISMA-compliant article

Background:To investigate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril-valsartan in patients with heart failure, relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were analyzed.Methods:We used Cochrane Library, PubMed web of science, CNKI, VIP, Medline, ISI Web of Science, CBMdisc, and Wanfang database to conduct a systematic literature research. A fixed-effects model was used to evaluate the standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals. We conducted sensitivity analysis and analyzed publication bias to comprehensively estimate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril-valsartan in patients with heart failure.Results:Among 132 retrieved studies, 5 relevant RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The result showed that left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was improved after sacubitril-valsartan in patients with heart failure, with an SMD (95% CI of 1.1 [1.01, 1.19] and P < .00001 fixed-effects model). Combined outcome indicators showed that, combined outcome indicators showed that, compared with control group, the left ventricular volume index (LAVI) (WMD = −2.18, 95% CI [−3.63, −0.74], P = .003), the E/e’ (WMD = −1.01, 95% CI [−1.89, −0.12], P = .03), the cardiovascular death (RR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.83, 0.96], P = .003], and the rehospitalization rate of heart failure (RR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.78, 0.88], P < .01) decreased more significantly, but it had no effect on renal function (WMD = 0.74, 95% CI [0.54, 1.01], P = .06).Conclusions:The present meta-analysis suggested that sacubitril-valsartan may improve the cardiac function of heart failure. Given the limited number of included studies, additional large sample-size RCTs are required to determine the long-term effect of cardiac function of sacubitril-valsartan in patients with heart failure.     

The analgesic evaluation of gabapentin for arthroscopy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Introduction:The efficacy of gabapentin for pain management of arthroscopy remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of gabapentin versus placebo on the postoperative pain intensity of arthroscopy.Methods:We search PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through April 2020 for randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of gabapentin versus placebo on pain control of arthroscopy. This meta-analysis is performed using the random-effect model.Results:Five randomized controlled trials are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group for arthroscopy, gabapentin remarkably decreases pain scores at 24 hour (standard mean difference [SMD]=-0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]=-1.15 to -0.02; P = .21), analgesic consumption (SMD = -18.24; 95% CI=-24.61 to -11.88; P < .00001), nausea and vomiting (OR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.21 to 0.84; P = .01), but has no obvious influence on pain scores at 6 h (SMD = −1.30; 95% CI = −2.92 to 0.31; P = .11) or dizziness (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 0.56 to 2.24; P = .75).Conclusions:Gabapentin is effective for pain control after arthroscopy.     

Comparison of clinical efficacy of robotic right colectomy and laparoscopic right colectomy for right colon tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of robotic right colectomy (RRC) and laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) in the treatment of right colon tumor.Methods:We systematically searched PubMed, Web of science, EMBASE ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Central Register for studies (studies published between January 2011 and June 2020). The included studies compared the clinical efficacy of RRC and LRC in the treatment of right colon tumor, and analyzed the perioperative data.Results:Our meta-analysis included 10 studies involving 1180 patients who underwent 2 surgical procedures, RRC and LRC. This study showed that compared with LRC, there was no significant difference in first flatus passage (weighted mean difference [WMD]: −0.37, 95% CI: −1.09–0.36, P = .32), hospital length of stay (WMD: −0.23, 95% CI: −0.73–0.28, P = .32), reoperation (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 0.67–4.10, P = .27), complication (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.60–1.14, P = .25), mortality (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.02–11.22, P = .63), wound infection (OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.34–1.25, P = .20), and anastomotic leak (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.33–1.63, P = .44). This study showed that compared with LRC, the lymph nodes retrieved (WMD: 1.47, 95% CI: −0.00–2.94, P = .05) of RRC were similar, with slight advantages, and resulted in longer operative time (WMD: 65.20, 95% CI: 53.40–77.01, P < .00001), less estimated blood loss (WMD: −13.43, 95% CI: −20.65–6.21, P = .0003), and less conversion to open surgery (OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.17–0.54, P < .0001).Conclusions:RRC is equivalent to LRC with respect to first flatus passage, hospital length of stay, reoperation, complication, and results in less conversion to LRC.     

Efficacy and safety of nitrate supplementation on exercise tolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Exercise intolerance was prevalent in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and had a detrimental effect on the quality of life. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nitrate supplementation in exercise tolerance of people with COPD.Methods:We searched medical databases including Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed from inception to October 2020 for randomized control trials in treating COPD with nitrate supplementation.Results:Nine trials were identified. Compared with placebo, nitrate supplementation has no significant effect on the following variables: exercise endurance time (standard mean difference [SMD]: 0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: –0.39 to 0.52; P = .79), exercise capacity (SMD: 0.30; 95% CI: –0.21 to 0.80; P = .25), oxygen consumption (SMD: –0.04; 95% CI: –0.33 to 0.25; P = .80), resting systolic blood pressure (MD: –2.84; 95% CI: –8.46 to 2.78; P = .32), systolic blood pressure after exercise (MD: –4.66; 95% CI –15.66 to 6.34; P = .41), resting diastolic blood pressure (MD: 0.89; 95% CI: –4.41 to 6.19; P = .74), diastolic blood pressure after exercise (MD: –0.21; 95% CI: –5.51 to 5.10; P = .94), heart rate (MD: –2.52; 95% CI: –7.76 to 2.73; P = .35), and arterial oxygen saturation (MD: –0.44; 95% CI: –2.38 to 1.49; P = .65). No severe adverse effects from nitrate supplementation were reported in the included trails.Conclusion:Current evidence suggests that nitrate supplementation may be safe but ineffective for improving exercise tolerance in people with COPD.     

Clinical efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine Xiao Yao San in insomnia combined with anxiety

Background:Patients with long-term insomnia generally experience anxiety and depression. Traditional sleeping pills and anti-anxiety drugs have certain limitations. Xiao Yao San (XYS), a complementary and alternative therapy, has been widely used to treat insomnia combined with anxiety. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of XYS in the treatment of insomnia combined with anxiety.Methods:Related literature was retrieved from 8 electronic databases from the establishment time to March 2021. The subjects were diagnosed with insomnia combined with anxiety. We assessed the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) according to the Cochrane Handbook. Data analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.Results:The analysis includes 9 RCTs involving 681 patients. Meta-analysis supported that as an auxiliary drug for Western medicine (WM), XYS could enhance the clinical efficacy of insomnia calculated according to the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome score scale (risk ratio [RR]: 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13–1.43; P = .0002) and reduced the scores of Hamilton Anxiety Scale (mean difference [MD]: −5.19; 95% CI: −7.78 to −2.60; P < .001), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (MD: −3.35; 95% CI: −4.86 to −1.84; P < .001), Self-rating Anxiety Scale (MD: −9.38; 95% CI: −10.20 to −8.75; P < .001), TCM syndrome score scale for insomnia (MD: −4.45; 95% CI: −6.65 to −2.24; P < .001), and TCM syndrome score scale for anxiety (MD: −5.54; 95% CI: −9.48 to −1.6; P = .006). The summary analysis also shows that the separate use of XYS was advantageous in reducing the scores of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (MD: −3.70; 95% CI: −6.31 to −1.09; P = .005), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (MD: −1.82; 95% CI: −2.39 to −1.24; P < .001), and Self-rating Anxiety Scale (MD: −10.79; 95% CI: −14.09 to −7.49; P < .001). The incidence of adverse events with XYS as an ancillary drug or used separately was lower than that in the WM.Conclusion:Our systematic evaluation and meta-analysis showed that XYS combined with WM or XYS alone was beneficial for improving sleep quality and relieving anxiety. Due to the low methodological quality, small sample size, and significant heterogeneity of RCTs, more rigorous and scientific clinical trials are required to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of XYS.PROSPERO registration number:CRD42020190613.     

Safety and efficacy of left bundle branch pacing in comparison with conventional right ventricular pacing: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Right ventricular pacing (RVP) has been widely accepted as a traditional pacing strategy, but long-term RVP has detrimental impact on ventricular synchrony. However, left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) that evolved from His-bundle pacing could maintain ventricular synchrony and overcome its clinical deficiencies such as difficulty of lead implantation, His bundle damage, and high and unstable thresholds. This analysis aimed to appraise the clinical safety and efficacy of LBBP.Methods:The Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases from inception to November 2020 were searched for studies comparing LBBP and RVP.Results:Seven trials with 451 patients (221 patients underwent LBBP and 230 patients underwent RVP) were included in the analysis. Pooled analyses verified that the paced QRS duration (QRSd) and left ventricular mechanical synchronization parameters of the LBBP capture were similar with the native-conduction mode (P > .7),but LBBP showed shorter QRS duration (weighted mean difference [WMD]: −33.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], −40.44 to −26.19, P < .001), better left ventricular mechanical synchrony (standard mean differences: −1.5; 95% CI: −1.85 to −1.14, P < .001) compared with RVP. No significant differences in Pacing threshold (WMD: 0.01; 95% CI: −0.08 to 0.09, P < .001), R wave amplitude (WMD: 0.04; 95% CI: −1.12 to 1.19, P = .95) were noted between LBBP and RVP. Ventricular impedance of LBBP was higher than that of RVP originally (WMD: 19.34; 95% CI: 3.13–35.56, P = .02), and there was no difference between the 2 groups after follow-up (WMD: 11.78; 95% CI: −24.48 to 48.04, P = .52). And follow-up pacing threshold of LBBP kept stability (WMD: 0.08; 95% CI: −0.09 to 0.25, P = .36). However, no statistical difference existed in ejection fraction between the 2 groups (WMD: 1.41; 95% CI: −1.72 to 4.54, P = .38).Conclusions:The safety and efficacy of LBBP was firstly verified by meta-analysis to date. LBBP markedly preserve ventricular electrical and mechanical synchrony compared with RVP. Meanwhile, LBBP had stable and excellent pacing parameters. However, LBBP could not be significant difference in ejection fraction between RVP during short- term follow-up.     

Quality of Life After Surgery or Surveillance for Asymptomatic Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

A number of studies have investigated the effects of surgery on symptoms and quality of life in patients with hyperparathyroidism. However, the results are inconsistent. We conducted this meta-analysis to quantitatively assess changes in quality of life among patients with asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism.Different databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing surgery with surveillance. Quality of life was measured by the Short Form-36 general health survey. The pooled random-effects estimates of standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.Three trials involving 294 participants were included. At 1 year, patients undergoing parathyroidectomy had significantly better physical role functioning (SMD, 0.31; 95% CI 0.04–0.57; P = 0.02) and emotional role functioning (SMD, 0.29; 95% CI 0.02–0.55; P = 0.03). At 2 years, the surgery group had significantly better emotional role functioning (SMD, 0.35; 95% CI 0.02–0.67; P = 0.04) than the surveillance group. Furthermore, compared with baseline, emotional role functioning improved after surgery (SMD, 0.31; 95% CI 0.02–0.60; P = 0.04), whereas emotional role functioning tended to get worse in patients assigned to medical surveillance (SMD, −0.27; 95% CI −0.55 to 0.02; P = 0.07).Although Short Form-36 is a generic instrument, our results suggest that parathyroidectomy may be associated with better quality of life, especially in the emotional aspects of well-being.     

The periodontal status of removable appliances vs fixed appliances: A comparative meta-analysis

Background:Although several researchers have analyzed the dental identity of patients experience with corrective methods using fixed and removable appliances, the consequences stay debatable. This meta-analysis intended to verify whether the periodontal status of removable appliances is similar to that of the conventional fixed appliances.Methods:Relevant literature was retrieved from the database of Cochrane library, PubMed, EMBASE, and CNKI until December 2019, without time or language restrictions. Comparative clinical studies assessing periodontal conditions between removable appliances and fixed appliances were included for analysis. The data was analyzed using the Stata 12.0 software.Results:A total of 13 articles involving 598 subjects were selected for this meta-analysis. We found that the plaque index (PLI) identity of the removable appliances group was significantly lower compared to the fixed appliances group at 3 months (OR = −0.57, 95% CI: −0.98 to −0.16, P = .006) and 6 months (OR = −1.10, 95% CI: −1.60 to −0.61, P = .000). The gingival index (GI) of the removable appliances group was lower at 6 months (OR = −1.14, 95% CI: −1.95 to −0.34, P = .005), but the difference was not statistically significant at 3 months (OR = −0.20, 95% CI: −0.50 to 0.10, P = .185) when compared with that of the fixed appliances group. The sulcus probing depth (SPD) of the removable appliances group was lower compared to the fixed appliances group at 3 months (OR = −0.26, 95% CI: −0.52 to −0.01, P = .047) and 6 months (OR = −0.42, 95% CI: −0.83 to −0.01, P = .045). The shape of the funnel plot was symmetrical, indicating no obvious publication bias in the Begg test (P = .174); the Egger test also indicated no obvious publication bias (P = .1).Conclusion:Our meta-analysis demonstrated that malocclusion patients treated with the removable appliances demonstrated a better periodontal status as compared with those treated with fixed orthodontic appliances. However, the analyses of more numbers of clinical trials are warranted to confirm this conclusion.     

Femoral nerve block versus fascia iliaca block for pain control in knee and hip arthroplasties: A meta-analysis

Background:This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficiency of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) and femoral nerve block (FNB) for pain management in knee and hip surgeries.Methods:We searched four electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library database, Web of Science) from inception to January 2019. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Two review authors independently extracted data for each included study. Primary outcomes were visual analogue scale at 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, total morphine consumption, the length of hospital stay and the occurrence of nausea and vomiting. Standardized mean difference (SMD) or risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous outcomes and discontinuous outcomes respectively. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool to assess risk of bias. Stata 12.0 was used for meta-analysis.Results:Finally, 7 RCTs involving 508 patients (FICB = 254, FNB = 254) were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with FNB group, FICB has no benefit for visual analogue scale at 12 hours (SMD = 0.02, 95% CI, −0.15 to 0.19; P = .820), 24 hours (SMD = −0.02, 95% CI, −0.22 to 0.18; P = .806), and 48 hours (SMD = −0.02, 95% CI, −0.22 to 0.19; P = .872). No significant differences were found regarding total morphine consumption (SMD = −0.07, 95% CI, −0.29 to 0.15; P = .533). What''s more, there was no significant difference between the length of hospital stay and the occurrence of nausea and vomiting (P > .05).Conclusion:FICB has equivalent pain control and morphine-sparing efficacy when compared with FNB. More high-quality RCTs are needed to identify the optimal drugs and volume of local infiltration protocols.     

Safety and Efficacy of the Moderate Sedation During Flexible Bronchoscopic Procedure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Moderate sedatives have been increasingly used to improve patient comfort during flexible bronchoscopy (FB). However, routine use of moderate sedation during FB is controversial because its efficacy and safety are not well established.This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of moderate sedation during FB.A search was made of Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to May 2014.Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs were included.The main analysis was designed to examine the efficacy of moderate sedation during FB in sedation than no-sedation.The willingness to repeat FB was significantly more in sedation than no-sedation (odds ratio [OR] 2.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–4.73; P = 0.02; I² = 22.5). The duration of FB was shorter in sedation group than no-sedation group (standardized mean difference [SMD] −0.21; 95% CI −0.38 to −0.03; P = 0.02; I² = 78.3%). Event of hypoxia was not significantly different between sedation and no-sedation groups (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.42–1.73; P = 0.67; I² = 0%). The SpO₂ during procedure was not different between sedation and no-sedation groups (SMD −0.14; 95% CI −0.37 to 0.08; P = 0.21; I² = 49.9%). However, in subgroup analysis without supplemental oxygen, the SpO₂ was significantly lower in sedation than no-sedation group (SMD −0.45; 95% CI −0.78 to −0.11; P = 0.01; I² = 0.0%).According to this meta-analysis, moderate sedation in FB would be useful in patients who will require repeated bronchoscopies as well as safe in respiratory depression. To our knowledge, although the various sedative drugs are already used in the real field, this analysis was the first attempt to quantify objective results. We anticipate more definite and studies designed to elucidate standardized outcomes for moderate sedation in FB.     

The efficiency and safety of methimazole and propylthiouracil in hyperthyroidism: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Purpose:The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency and safety of methimazole (MMI) and propylthiouracil (PTU) in the treatment of hyperthyroidism.Methods:Articles were searched through the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and QVIP. The primary outcomes were clinical efficacy and thyroid hormone levels in MMI and PTU groups. The secondary outcomes were liver function indexes and adverse reactions in MMI and PTU groups. Results were expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The Begg test was applied to assess the publication bias.Results:Totally, 16 randomized controlled trials were retained in this meta-analysis with 973 patients receiving MMI and 933 receiving PTU. The levels of triiodothyronine (T₃) (WMD = −1.321, 95% CI: −2.271 to −0.372, P = .006), thyroxine (T₄) (WMD = −37.311, 95% CI: −61.012 to −13.610, P = .002), Free T3 (FT3) (WMD = −1.388, 95% CI: −2.543 to −0.233, P = .019), Free T₄ (FT₄) (WMD = −3.613, 95% CI: −5.972 to −1.255, P = .003), and the risk of liver function damage (OR = 0.208, 95% CI: 0.146–0.296, P < .001) in the MMI group were lower than those in the PTU group. The thyroid-stimulating hormone level (WMD = 0.787, 95% CI: 0.380–1.194, P < .001) and the risk of hypothyroidism (OR = 2.738, 95% CI: 1.444–5.193, P = .002) were higher in the MMI group than those in the PTU group.Conclusions:Although MMI might have higher risk of hypothyroidism than PTU, the efficacy of MMI may be better than PTU in patients with hyperthyroidism regarding reducing T₃, T₄, FT₃, and FT₄ levels, decreasing the risk of liver function damage and increasing the level of thyroid-stimulating hormone.Register number:osf.io/ds637 (https://osf.io/search/).     

The effectiveness of dextrose prolotherapy in plantar fasciitis: A systemic review and meta-analysis

Background:Dextrose prolotherapy (DPT) is considered to be a type of regenerative therapy and is widely used in various musculoskeletal disorders. Plantar fasciitis is a common cause of heel pain that affects the quality of life of many people. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DPT for plantar fasciitis.Methods:PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from their respective inception dates to June 2021. Only randomized controlled trials comparing DPT and other interventions for plantar fasciitis were included in this review. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for comparison. The outcome measurements included visual analog score, numeric rating scale, Foot Function index, Revised Foot Function index, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score, and plantar fascia thickness. Post-treatment duration was classified as short-term (1–2 months), medium-term (3 months), or long-term (6 months).Results:Six studies with 388 adult patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis were included for the meta-analysis. In terms of pain scores improvement, DPT was superior to placebo or exercise in the short-term (SMD: −1.163, 95%CI: −2.17 to −0.156) and the medium-term (SMD: −1.394, 95%CI: −2.702 to −0.085). DPT was inferior to corticosteroid injection in the short-term (SMD: 0.781, 95%CI: 0.41 to 1.152). For functional improvement, DPT was superior to placebo or exercise in the short-term (SMD: −1.51, 95%CI: −2.96 to −0.059), but inferior to corticosteroid injection (SMD: 0.526, 95%CI: 0.161 to 0.89) and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the short-term (SMD: 0.484, 95%CI: 0.145 to 0.822). Randomized controlled trials showed a better pain improvement in the long-term for patients treated with DPT compared to corticosteroid (P = .002) and exercise control (P < .05). No significant differences were found between patients treated with DPT and patients treated with platelet-rich plasma.Conclusion:Dextrose prolotherapy was a safe and effective treatment option for plantar fasciitis that may have long-term benefits for patients. The effects were comparable to extracorporeal shock wave therapy or platelet-rich plasma injection. Further studies with standardized protocols and long-term follow-up are needed to address potential biases.     

Programmed intermittent epidural bolus in parturients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) in parturientsMethods:The PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (from inception to July 2021) were searched for identification of randomized placebo-controlled trials in which PIEB was applied in parturients. The outcomes were the effect of analgesia, satisfaction score, mode of delivery, duration of labor, neonatal condition, and adverse events. The pooled odds ratios (OR), weighted mean difference (WMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random- and fixed-effects models.Results:PIEB was found to be associated with decreased total consumption of ropivacaine (WMD = −15.83, 95% CI: −19.06 to −12.60, P < .00001; I² = 61%; P for heterogeneity = .04), total consumption of sufentanil (WMD = −4.93, 95% CI: −6.87 to 2.98, P < .00001; I² = 68%; P for heterogeneity = .05), numbers of patients who require patient-controlled epidural analgesia bolus (OR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.14–0.51, P < .0001; I² = 65%; P for heterogeneity = .01), the number of attempts (WMD = −4.12, 95% CI: −7.21 to −1.04, P = .009; I² = 100%; P for heterogeneity < .00001), rate of breakthrough pain (OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.28–0.80, P = .005; I² = 47%; P for heterogeneity = .09). Eight studies focus on the duration of analgesia. After by meta-analysis, we found that the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score at 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, and 5 hours in PIEB group was significantly lower when compared with control group, (WMD = −0.15, 95% CI: −0.26 to −0.04, P = .006; I² = 0%; P for heterogeneity = .64), (WMD = −0.79, 95% CI: −1.32 to 0.25, P = .004; I² = 97%; P for heterogeneity < .00001), (WMD = −1.00, 95% CI: −1.08 to −0.91, P < .00001; I² = 0%; P for heterogeneity = .67), (WMD = −1.81, 95% CI: −3.23 to −0.39, P = .01; I² = 98%; P for heterogeneity < .00001), respectively. Nineteen studies discussed the mode of delivery between 2 groups. The results suggest that the rate of normal delivery is significantly higher in PIEB group compared with control group (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.08–1.75, P = .01). The time of first and second stage of labor are significantly shorter in PIEB group compared with control group, the result is (WMD = −10.52, 95% CI: −14.74 to 4.76, P < .00001; I² = 0%; P for heterogeneity = .86), (WMD = −1.48, 95% CI: −2.26 to −0.69, P = .0002; I² = 35%; P for heterogeneity = .10), respectively. Thirteen studies concerned the satisfaction score of patients. The satisfaction score of patients in the PIEB group was significantly higher when compared with control group (WMD = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.42–1.39, P = .0003; I² = 98%; P for heterogeneity < .00001). The Apgar score at 1, 5 minutes in PIEB group are significantly higher (WMD = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.02–0.13 P = .007; I² = 55%; P for heterogeneity = .04), (WMD = −0.08, 95% CI: −0.12 to −0.05, P < .00001; I² = 21%; P for heterogeneity = .27), respectively.Conclusions:PIEB is a good alternative for labor analgesia with better analgesic effect, maternal and infant outcome.     

Efficacy and safety of riociguat in the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary arterial hypertension: A meta-analysis

Background:Riociguat is a novel soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator, and has been widely used for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Some studies found that riociguat had better effects on CTEPH and proved to be safe, but the results were not utterly consistent. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of riociguat in the treatment of CTEPH.Methods:Randomized controlled trials on riociguat for the treatment of CTEPH were searched through such electronic databases as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China national knowledge internet, and Wanfang. The outcomes included exercise capacity, pulmonary hemodynamics, and side effects. The fixed-effects or random-effects models were used to analyze the pooled data, and heterogeneity was assessed by the I² test.Results:Four studies involving 520 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the placebo group, riociguat significantly improved the hemodynamic indexes and increased 6-min walking distance (P < .0001, standardized mean difference (SMD) = −0.24, 95%CI −0.35 to −0.12; P < .00001, SMD = 0.52, 95%CI 0.33 to 0.71), and decreased the Borg dyspnea score (P = .002, SMD = −0.31, 95%CI −0.51 to −0.12). In addition, riociguat could also significantly reduce the living with pulmonary hypertension scores and increase the EQ-5D scores (P = .01, SMD=−0.23, 95%CI −0.42 to −0.05; P < .00001, SMD = 0.47, 95%CI 0.27 to 0.66), but there was no significant difference in the change level of N-terminal pro-hormone B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with riociguat (P = .20, SMD = −0.24, 95%CI −0.61 to −0.13). The common adverse events of riociguat were dyspepsia and peripheral edema, and no other serious adverse reactions were observed.Conclusions:We confirmed that riociguat had better therapeutic effects in improving the hemodynamic parameters and exercise capacity in patients with CTEPH without inducing serious adverse events. This will provide a reasonable medication regimen for the treatment of CTEPH.     

The efficacy and safety of metformin combined with simvastatin in the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Background:Several previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the efficacy of metformin combined with simvastatin in the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), yet the results of the researches are not consistent. It is necessary to conduct a meta-analysis to explore the efficacy and safety of metformin combined with simvastatin in the treatment of PCOS, to provide evidence supports for the treatment of PCOS.Methods:We searched PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and Chinese biomedical literature databases online to identify the RCTs evaluating the efficacy of metformin combined with simvastatin in the treatment of PCOS. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated to evaluate the synthesized effects.Results:Nine RCTs with a total of 746 PCOS patients were included. The synthesized results indicated that the combined use of metformin and simvastatin are more beneficial to reduce the total cholesterol (SMD –2.66, 95% CI –3.65 to –1.66), triglycerides (SMD –1.25, 95% CI –2.02 to –0.49), low density lipoprotein (SMD –2.91, 95% CI –3.98 to –1.84), testosterone (SMD –0.64, 95% CI –1.13 to –0.15), fasting insulin (SMD –1.17, 95% CI –2.09 to –0.26) than metformin alone treatment in PCOS patients (all P < .001), and there was no significant difference in the high density lipoprotein (SMD –0.05, 95% CI –0.56–0.46), luteinizing hormone (SMD –0.58, 95% CI –1.66 to –0.50), follicle stimulating hormone (SMD 0.41, 95% CI –0.78–1.59), prolactin (SMD –1.38, 95% CI –2.93–0.17), fasting blood sugar (SMD 0.23, 95% CI –0.52–0.97), and insulin sensitivity index (SMD –0.17, 95% CI –0.48–0.15) between experimental and control groups (all P > .05).Conclusions:Metformin combined with simvastatin is superior to metformin alone in the treatment of PCOS patients with more advantages in improving the levels of sex hormones, blood lipids, and blood sugar. However, the safety of this therapy still needs to be further explored in clinical studies with high-quality and large samples.     

Low tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion is associated with a poor outcome in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess whether tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) could be used as a prognostic tool in patients with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19).Methods:Studies on the relationship between TAPSE and COVID-19 since February 2021. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals were used to assess the effect size. The potential for publication bias was assessed using a contour-enhanced funnel plot and Egger test. A meta-regression was performed to assess if the difference in TAPSE between survivors and nonsurvivors was affected by age, sex, hypertension or diabetes.Results:Sixteen studies comprising 1579 patients were included in this meta-analysis. TAPSE was lower in nonsurvivors (SMD −3.24 (−4.23, −2.26), P < .00001; I² = 71%), and a subgroup analysis indicated that TAPSE was also lower in critically ill patients (SMD −3.85 (−5.31, −2.38,), P < .00001; I² = 46%). Heterogeneity was also significantly reduced, I² < 50%. Pooled results showed that patients who developed right ventricular dysfunction had lower TAPSE (SMD −5.87 (−7.81, −3.92), P = .004; I² = 82%). There was no statistically significant difference in the TAPSE of patients who sustained a cardiac injury vs those who did not (SMD −1.36 (−3.98, 1.26), P = .31; I² = 88%). No significant publication bias was detected (P = .8147) but the heterogeneity of the included studies was significant. A meta-regression showed that heterogeneity was significantly greater when the incidence of hypertension was <50% (I² = 91%) and that of diabetes was <30% (I² = 85%).Conclusion:Low TAPSE levels are associated with poor COVID-19 disease outcomes. TAPSE levels are modulated by disease severity, and their prognostic utility may be skewed by pre-existing patient comorbidities.Trial retrospectively registered (February 12, 2021):PROSPERO CRD42021236731