Increased bleeding events with the addition of apixaban to the dual anti-platelet regimen for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis

Background:Dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel has been the mainstay of treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the recurrence of thrombotic events, potential aspirin and clopidogrel hypo-responsiveness, and other limitations of DAPT have led to the development of newer oral anti-thrombotic drugs. Apixaban, a new non-vitamin K antagonist, has been approved for use. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the bleeding outcomes observed with the addition of apixaban to DAPT for the treatment of patients with ACS.Methods:Online databases including EMBASE, Cochrane Central, http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov, MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched for English based publications comparing the use of apixaban added to DAPT for the treatment of patients with ACS. Different categories of bleeding events and cardiovascular outcomes were assessed. The analysis was carried out by the RevMan software version 5.4. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to represent the data following analysis.Results:This research analysis consisted of 4 trials with a total number of 9010 participants. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) defined major bleeding (OR: 2.45, 95% CI: 1.45–4.12; P = .0008), TIMI defined minor bleeding (OR: 3.12, 95% CI: 1.71–5.70; P = .0002), International society of thrombosis and hemostasis (ISTH) major bleeding (OR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.80–3.45; P = .00001) and Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries (GUSTO) defined severe bleeding (OR: 3.00, 95% CI: 1.56–5.78; P = .01) were significantly increased with the addition of apixaban to DAPT versus DAPT alone in these patients with ACS. However fatal bleeding (OR: 10.96, 95% CI: 0.61–198.3; P = .11) was not significantly different.Conclusions:Addition of the novel oral anticoagulant apixaban to the DAPT regimen significantly increased bleeding and therefore did not show any beneficial effect in these patients with ACS. However, due to the extremely limited data, we apparently have to rely on future larger studies to confirm this hypothesis.     

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus monotherapy versus tacrolimus-corticosteroid combination therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A meta-analysis

Objective:The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (TAC) monotherapy versus TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) patients.Methods:Databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang database were searched from inception to January 10, 2021. Eligible studies comparing TAC monotherapy and TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy in IMN patients were included. Data were analysed using Review Manager Version 5.3.Results:Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. One randomized controlled trial and six cohort studies involving 372 patients were identified. Compared with TAC monotherapy, TAC-corticosteroid had a higher total remission at the sixth month (odd ratio (OR) 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31–0.78, P < .01). The two therapy regimens had similar complete remission rates (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.43–1.48, P = .47) at the sixth month and similar relapse rates (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.70–2.92, P = .32). TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy had a higher incidence of infection (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18–0.81, P = .01). The two therapy regimens had similar incidences of gastrointestinal symptoms (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.34–2.70, P = .93), abnormal aminotransferase (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.34–2.38, P = .84), and glucose intolerance (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.32–1.07, P = .08).Conclusion:TAC-corticosteroid combination therapy had a higher total remission rate at the sixth month but had a higher incidence of infection than TAC monotherapy in the treatment of IMN. The two therapeutic regimens had similar relapse rates.     

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus monotherapy versus cyclophosphamide–corticosteroid combination therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A meta-analysis

ObjectiveThe objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (TAC) monotherapy versus cyclophosphamide (CTX)-corticosteroid combination therapy in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) patients.MethodsDatabases including the PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases were searched from inception to October 20, 2020. Eligible studies comparing TAC monotherapy and CTX-corticosteroid combination therapy in IMN patients were included. Data were analyzed using Review Manager Version 5.3.ResultsNine studies were included in the meta-analysis. One randomized controlled trial and eight cohort studies involving 442 patients were identified. Compared with CTX-corticosteroid combination therapy for IMN, TAC monotherapy had higher complete remission (CR) at month 6 (odds ratio [OR] 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35–3.50, P < .01). The 2 therapeutic regimens had similar partial remission (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.45–1.04, P = .08), total remission (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.85–2.23, P = 0.19) at month 6, and similar CR (OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.84–3.19, P = .15), partial remission (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.37–1.38, P = 0.31), and total remission (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.55–3.01, P = .56) after 1 year. The relapse rate of the TAC group was higher than that of the CTX group, but the difference was not statistically significant (OR 1.85, 95% CI 0.75–4.53, P = .18). There was no difference between the 2 therapeutic regimens concerning glucose intolerance (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.61–2.14, P = .67), acute renal failure (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.39–3.33, P = .81), or tremors (OR 4.39, 95% CI 0.75–25.67, P = .10). Incidences of gastrointestinal symptoms (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10–0.79, P = .02), infection (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.08–0.39, P < 0.01), leukopenia (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04–0.51, P < .01), and abnormal aminotransferase (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.13–0.77, P = .01) in the TAC group were all lower than those in the CTX group. Subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the TAC group and the CTX combined with corticosteroid 0.8 to 1 mg/kg/day group concerning CR at month 6 (P > .05). There was no significant difference between the TAC group and the CTX combined with corticosteroid 0.5 mg/kg/day group concerning abnormal aminotransferase (P > .05).ConclusionTAC monotherapy is comparable to CTX-corticosteroid combination therapy for renal remission in IMN patients. TAC monotherapy had a higher CR in the early stage and had fewer drug-related adverse effects. The relapse rate of TAC monotherapy was higher than that of CTX-corticosteroid combination therapy, but the difference was not significant.     

Risk of bleeding with ticagrelor in elderly patients over 75 years old: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Bleeding is an untoward outcome in the management of elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Although the potent oral P2Y12 inhibitor, ticagrelor is clinically beneficial, its association with bleeding events in elderly ACS patients (≥75 years) is poorly understood.Methods:We conducted a systematic search of 7 databases up to May 20, 2020 to identify studies which examined the risk of bleeding (defined according to each study) among elderly ACS patients (≥75 years) receiving ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel. Summary risk ratios (RR) were estimated using the random effects model.Results:Eight studies consisting of 5 observational studies and 3 randomized controlled trials involving 7032 elderly patients met the eligibility criteria. The mean age of the patients was 77.8 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 12 months. Overall, the pooled RRs showed higher risk of a bleeding event with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel (RR 1.20, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.03–1.40; P = .017). No statistically significant heterogeneity was observed among the studies (Q = 6.93; P = .44; I² = 0). Also, pooled RRs did not show a higher risk of major bleeding (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.91–1.92; P = .15) or minor bleeding (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.76–1.58; P = .64) when comparing the ticagrelor to the clopidogrel group.Conclusions:There is a 20% increased risk of a bleeding event in elderly ACS patients treated with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel; for such patients, clopidogrel may be considered as an alternative agent to ticagrelor due to its lower risk of bleeding.     

Low-site versus traditional peritoneal dialysis catheterization: A meta-analysis

Background:The objective of this study was to compare the complications of low-site peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter placement and traditional open surgery in peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion.Methods:The following databases were searched from inception to September 6, 2019: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang. Eligible studies comparing low-site PD catheter placement and traditional open surgery in peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion were included. The data were analyzed using Review Manager Version 5.3.Results:Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 504 patients were included in the low-site PD catheter placement group, and 325 patients were included in the traditional open surgery group. Compared with traditional open surgery, low-site PD catheter placement had a lower incidence rate of catheter displacement (odds ratios [OR] 0.11, 95% CI 0.05–0.22, P < .01) and noncatheter displacement dysfunction (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.04–0.31, P < .01). However, there was no difference between the 2 catheter insertion methods concerning bleeding (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.23–1.22, P = .13), PD fluid leakage (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.15–1.10, P = .07), hypogastralgia (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.32–2.80, P = .93), peritonitis (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.32–1.54, P = .38), or exit-site and tunnel infections (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.14–1.03, P = .06).Conclusion:Low-site PD catheter placement reduced the risk of catheter displacement and noncatheter displacement dysfunction and did not increase the risk of bleeding, PD fluid leakage, hypogastralgia, peritonitis, or exit site and tunnel infections. Additional large multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these conclusions.     

Comparison of clinical efficacy of robotic right colectomy and laparoscopic right colectomy for right colon tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of robotic right colectomy (RRC) and laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) in the treatment of right colon tumor.Methods:We systematically searched PubMed, Web of science, EMBASE ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Central Register for studies (studies published between January 2011 and June 2020). The included studies compared the clinical efficacy of RRC and LRC in the treatment of right colon tumor, and analyzed the perioperative data.Results:Our meta-analysis included 10 studies involving 1180 patients who underwent 2 surgical procedures, RRC and LRC. This study showed that compared with LRC, there was no significant difference in first flatus passage (weighted mean difference [WMD]: −0.37, 95% CI: −1.09–0.36, P = .32), hospital length of stay (WMD: −0.23, 95% CI: −0.73–0.28, P = .32), reoperation (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 0.67–4.10, P = .27), complication (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.60–1.14, P = .25), mortality (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.02–11.22, P = .63), wound infection (OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.34–1.25, P = .20), and anastomotic leak (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.33–1.63, P = .44). This study showed that compared with LRC, the lymph nodes retrieved (WMD: 1.47, 95% CI: −0.00–2.94, P = .05) of RRC were similar, with slight advantages, and resulted in longer operative time (WMD: 65.20, 95% CI: 53.40–77.01, P < .00001), less estimated blood loss (WMD: −13.43, 95% CI: −20.65–6.21, P = .0003), and less conversion to open surgery (OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.17–0.54, P < .0001).Conclusions:RRC is equivalent to LRC with respect to first flatus passage, hospital length of stay, reoperation, complication, and results in less conversion to LRC.     

The necessity or not of the addition of fusion to decompression for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis patients: A PRISMA compliant meta-analysis

Background:The new emerging application of decompression combined with fusion comes with a concern of cost performance, however, it is a lack of big data support. We aimed to evaluate the necessity or not of the addition of fusion for decompression in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.Methods:Potential studies were selected from PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, and gray relevant studies were manually searched. We set the searching time spanning from the creating date of electronic engines to August 2020. STATA version 11.0 was exerted to process the pooled data.Results:Six RCTs were included in this study. A total of 650 patients were divided into 275 in the decompression group and 375 in the fusion group. No statistic differences were found in the visual analog scales (VAS) score for low back pain (weighted mean difference [WMD], –0.045; 95% confidence interval [CI], –1.259–1.169; P = .942) and leg pain (WMD, 0.075; 95% CI, –1.201–1.35; P = .908), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score (WMD, 1.489; 95% CI, –7.232–10.211; P = .738), European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) score (WMD, 0.03; 95% CI, –0.05–0.12; P = .43), Odom classification (OR, 0.353; 95% CI 0.113–1.099; P = .072), postoperative complications (OR, 0.437; 95% CI, 0.065–2.949; P = .395), secondary operation (OR, 2.541; 95% CI 0.897–7.198; P = .079), and postoperative degenerative spondylolisthesis (OR = 8.59, P = .27). Subgroup analysis of VAS score on low back pain (OR = 0.77, 95% CI, 0.36–1.65; P = .50) was demonstrated as no significant difference as well.Conclusion:The overall efficacy of the decompression combined with fusion is not revealed to be superior to decompression alone. At the same time, more evidence-based performance is needed to supplement this opinion.     

Safety and efficacy of S1 monotherapy or combined with nab-paclitaxel in advanced elderly pancreatic cancer patients: A meta-analysis

Objective:To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of S1 monotherapy or combination with nab-paclitaxel for the treatment of elderly patients with metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Method:PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Library, China Biology Medicine, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched without time limits according to the inclusion criteria. RevMan (Version 5.3) software was used for data extraction and meta-analysis. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were used to evaluate therapeutic effects while side effects including leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, neurotoxicity, vomit, and alopecia were extracted for evaluation. There was no need for ethical review in this study because no ethical experiments were conducted and all data used were public data. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.Results:Four retrospective studies comprising 308 elderly patients with metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included in the analysis. One hundred fifty-one patients underwent S1 monotherapy and 157 received S1 combined nab-paclitaxel. Meta-analysis indicated that compared with S1 monotherapy, S1 combined with nab-paclitaxel had higher ORR (OR 2.25, 95% CI: 1.42–3.55; P = .0005) and DCR (OR 2.94, 95% CI: 1.55–5.58; P = .0009). The adverse reaction of leukopenia was higher in the combined therapy group (OR 1.85, 95% CI: 1.09–3.13, P = .02), but no significant difference was found in thrombocytopenia, neurotoxicity, vomiting, and alopecia between the 2 groups (P > .05).Conclusion:Nab-paclitaxel plus S1 was more efficient in terms of ORR and DCR than S1 monotherapy in elderly pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients while the side effect was controllable with a higher probability of leukopenia. Thus, combined nab-paclitaxel and S1 could be safely used in elderly patients.     

Dual therapy with an oral non-vitamin K antagonist and a P2Y12 inhibitor vs triple therapy with aspirin,a P2Y12 inhibitor and a vitamin K antagonist for the treatment of diabetes mellitus patients with co-existing atrial fibrillation following percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis

Background:In this analysis, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of dual therapy (DT) with a non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) and an adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist (P2Y12 inhibitor) vs triple therapy (TT) with aspirin, a P2Y12 inhibitor and a vitamin K antagonist for the treatment of diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with co-existing atrial fibrillation (AF) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods:Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov, Excerpta Medical data BASE (EMBASE), Web of Science, Cochrane Central and Google Scholar were the searched databases. Studies that were randomized trials or observational studies comparing DT vs TT for the treatment of DM patients with co-existing AF following PCI were included in this analysis. The adverse cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding events were the endpoints. This meta-analysis was carried out by the RevMan version 5.4 software. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to represent data and interpret the analysis.Results:A total number of 4970 participants were included whereby 2456 participants were assigned to the DT group and 2514 participants were assigned to the TT group. The enrollment period varied from year 2006 to year 2018. Our current results showed that major adverse cardiac events (RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.84–1.20; P = .98), mortality (RR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.78–1.48; P = .66), myocardial infarction (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.74–1.42; P = .90), stroke (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.53–1.67; P = .84) and stent thrombosis (RR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.56–2.10; P = .80) were similar with DT versus TT in these patients. However, the risks for total major bleeding (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.54–0.82; P = .0001), total minor bleeding (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.64–0.85; P = .0001), Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) defined major bleeding (RR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.35–0.95; P = .03), TIMI defined minor bleeding (RR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.42–0.92; P = .02), intra-cranial bleeding (RR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13–0.95; P = .04) and major bleeding defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (RR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.51–0.90; P = .008) were significantly higher with TT.Conclusions:DT with a NOAC and a P2Y12 inhibitor was associated with significantly less bleeding events without increasing the adverse cardiovascular outcomes when compared to TT with aspirin, a P2Y12 inhibitor and a Vitamin K antagonist for the treatment of DM patients with co-existing AF following PCI. Hence, DT is comparable in efficacy, but safer compared to TT. This interesting hypothesis will have to be confirmed in future studies.     

Efficacy and safety of nitrate supplementation on exercise tolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Exercise intolerance was prevalent in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and had a detrimental effect on the quality of life. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nitrate supplementation in exercise tolerance of people with COPD.Methods:We searched medical databases including Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed from inception to October 2020 for randomized control trials in treating COPD with nitrate supplementation.Results:Nine trials were identified. Compared with placebo, nitrate supplementation has no significant effect on the following variables: exercise endurance time (standard mean difference [SMD]: 0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: –0.39 to 0.52; P = .79), exercise capacity (SMD: 0.30; 95% CI: –0.21 to 0.80; P = .25), oxygen consumption (SMD: –0.04; 95% CI: –0.33 to 0.25; P = .80), resting systolic blood pressure (MD: –2.84; 95% CI: –8.46 to 2.78; P = .32), systolic blood pressure after exercise (MD: –4.66; 95% CI –15.66 to 6.34; P = .41), resting diastolic blood pressure (MD: 0.89; 95% CI: –4.41 to 6.19; P = .74), diastolic blood pressure after exercise (MD: –0.21; 95% CI: –5.51 to 5.10; P = .94), heart rate (MD: –2.52; 95% CI: –7.76 to 2.73; P = .35), and arterial oxygen saturation (MD: –0.44; 95% CI: –2.38 to 1.49; P = .65). No severe adverse effects from nitrate supplementation were reported in the included trails.Conclusion:Current evidence suggests that nitrate supplementation may be safe but ineffective for improving exercise tolerance in people with COPD.     

Postoperative complications observed with robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of rectal cancer: An updated meta-analysis of recently published studies

Background:This is an updated meta-analysis comparing the postoperative complications observed with robotic versus laparoscopic surgery (LS) for the treatment of rectal cancer.Methods:Cochrane central, MEDLNE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), EMBASE (Excerpta Medica dataBASE), Google Scholar, Web of Science and http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for studies (published after the year 2015), comparing robotic versus LS for the treatment of rectal cancer. The postoperative outcomes were considered as the endpoints in this analysis. RevMan 5.4 was used to carry out the statistical analysis. Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to represent the results following data analysis.ResultsA total number of 22,744 participants were included in this study whereby 9178 participants were assigned to the robotic surgery and 13,566 participants were assigned to the LS group. The time period of patients’ enrollment varied from years 2007 to 2017. Our results showed that overall complications (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.71–1.17; P = .45), wound complications (RR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.64–1.04; P = .09), anastomotic leak (RR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.88–1.42; P = .37), anastomotic bleeding (RR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.29–2.64; P = .82), stoma-related complications (RR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.24–3.21; P = .85), intra-abdominal abscess (RR: 0.53. 95% CI: 0.22–1.31; P = .17), urinary tract infection (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.53–1.66; P = .83), enterocolitis (RR: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.38–4.71; P = .64), reoperation (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.46–1.54; P = .58), and mortality (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.34–1.62; P = .46) were not significantly different between robotic-assisted versus LS for rectal cancer. Postoperative ileus (RR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.81–1.81; P = .34), readmission (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.75–1.83; P = .48), and urinary retention (RR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.21–1.23; P = .14) were also similarly manifested.Conclusions:In this updated meta-analysis, both robotic and laparoscopic surgeries were equally effective for the treatment of rectal cancer. Similar postoperative complications were observed. However, our analysis was restricted only to postoperative outcomes, parameters such as duration of surgery were not taken into consideration.     

A meta-analysis of the association of atrial septal abnormalities and atrial vulnerability

Background:The mechanism of cryptogenic stroke (CS) in patients with atrial septal abnormalities remains unclear, and the increased incidence of atrial vulnerability may be one of the reasons. We performed this meta-analysis to clarify the association between atrial septal abnormalities and atrial vulnerability, and to provide evidence-based basis for the prevention and mechanism of CS.Methods:We systematically searched for studies on the association between atrial septal abnormalities and atrial vulnerability, and pooled available data on types of atrial septal abnormalities, types of atrial vulnerability, and methods of atrial vulnerability detection. The primary endpoints were the occurrence of atrial arrhythmias or P wave abnormalities. Random-effects models were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).Results:Twelve case-control studies were eligible. Compared with the control group, patients with atrial septal abnormalities had a higher risk of atrial vulnerability (OR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.13-3.30, P = .02). Data based on stroke patients showed that the group with atrial septal abnormalities had a higher risk of atrial vulnerability than the control group (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.13–3.53, P = .02). However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of atrial vulnerability between the 2 groups of nonstroke patients. Subgroup analysis showed that although atrial septal abnormality increased the risk of atrial vulnerability in the subgroup of atrial septal aneurysm (OR: 1.68; 95% CI: 0.47–5.95, P = .42), the subgroup of atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial fluster (OR: 1.81; 95% CI: 0.94–3.46, P = .07) and the subgroup of subcutaneous recording system (OR: 1.33; 95% CI: 0.68–2.61, P = .41), the difference was not statistically significant.Conclusions:Atrial septal abnormalities can increase the risk of atrial vulnerability, and atrial arrhythmia caused by atrial septal abnormalities may be one of the mechanisms of CS.     

Perioperative omega-3 fatty acids for liver surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Introduction:The effect of perioperative omega-3 fatty acids for liver surgery remained controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of omega-3 fatty acids versus placebo in patients undergoing liver surgery.Methods:We have searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through May 2020, and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of omega-3 fatty acids versus placebo for liver surgery. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model.Results:Five RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group for liver surgery, omega-3 fatty acids were associated with substantially reduced incidence of infection (odd ratio [OR]=0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.34–0.91; P = .02), but revealed no remarkable influence on complications (OR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.29–1.24; P = .17), mortality (OR = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.06–9.37; P = .83), liver failure (OR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.10 to 5.00; P = 0.74), biliary leakage (OR=1.24; 95% CI = 0.41 to 3.76; P = .70), bleeding (OR = 1.76; 95% CI = 0.63–4.95; P = .28), or ileus (OR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.07–2.05; P = .27).Conclusion:Perioperative omega-3 fatty acids may be beneficial to reduce the incidence of infection after liver surgery.     

Is There Any Significant Difference in Stent Thrombosis Between Sirolimus and Paclitaxel Eluting Stents?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Several meta-analyses have shown no significant difference in stent thrombosis (ST) between sirolimus eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel eluting stents (PES). However, other meta-analyses have found SES to be superior to PES. Therefore, to solve this issue, we aim to compare the clinical outcomes between SES and PES during a follow-up period of about 1 or more years.We have searched Medline and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SES with PES. These RCTs have been carefully analyzed and then different types of ST including ST defined by the Academic Research Consortium (ARC), acute ST, late and very late ST have all been considered as the clinical endpoints in this study. A follow-up period of about 1 year, between 1 and 2 years as well as a longer follow-up period between 1 and 5 years have been considered. Data were retrieved and combined by means of a fixed-effect model because of a lower heterogeneity observed among the results. Odd ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and the pooled analyses were performed with RevMan 5.3 software.Twenty-nine studies from 19 RCTs comprising of 16,724 patients (8115 patients in the SES group and 8609 patients in the PES group) satisfied the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. No significant differences in ST have been observed between SES and PES. Results were as follow: definite ST with OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.64–1.18, P = 0.36; probable ST with OR:0.72; 95% CI: 0.42–1.21, P = 0.21; definite, probable and/or possible ST with OR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.75–1.17, P = 0.57; acute ST with OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.38–2.56, P = 0.98; subacute ST with OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.41–1.25, P = 0.25; early ST with OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.53–1.25, P = 0.34; late ST with OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.39–1.34, P = 0.30; very late ST with OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.72–1.44, P = 0.92; and any ST with OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.69–1.07, P = 0.18. Long-term ST between 1 and 5 years with OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.71–1.22, P = 0.60 was also not significantly different.No significant difference in ST has been observed between patients treated with either SES or PES. Hence SES and PES can both be considered almost equally effective.     

Association between Alpha B-crystallin expression and prognosis in patients with solid tumors: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Alpha B-crystallin (CRYAB), as a small heat shock protein, may play critical roles in the tumorigenesis and progression of several kinds of human cancers. However, the prognostic value of CRYAB in solid malignancies remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between CRYAB expression and clinicopathology and prognosis of solid tumor patients.Methods:PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang databases were systematically searched to retrieve studies that investigated the prognostic value of CRYAB expression in various solid tumors. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to determine the strength of association between CRYAB expression and survival in patients with solid tumors. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were pooled to assess the correlation between CRYAB expression and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with solid tumors.Results:A total of 17 studies, including 18 cohorts with 6000 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. Our results showed that increased CRYAB expression could predict poor overall survival (HR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.50–2.19, P < .001), disease-free survival (HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.16–1.86, P = .001), and disease-specific survival (HR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.19–1.63, P < .001) in patients with cancer. Furthermore, the high expression level of CRYAB was associated with certain phenotypes of tumor aggressiveness, such as lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.48–4.11, P = .001), distant metastasis (OR = 3.34, 95% CI: 1.96–5.70, P < .001), advanced clinical stage (OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.24–4.08, P = .008), low OS rate (OR = 4.81, 95% CI: 2.82–8.19, P < .001), and high recurrence rate (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.11–1.72, P = .004).Conclusions:CRYAB may serve as a valuable prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in human solid tumors.     

Efficacy and safety comparing prasugrel/ticagrelor and clopidogrel in Hong Kong post‐acute coronary syndrome patients–A 10‐year cohort study

BackgroundClinical evidence of prasugrel/ticagrelor in dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in Asian acute coronary syndrome (ACS) population remains inconclusive. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of prasugrel/ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel as part of DAPT in Hong Kong ACS population for 10 years.HypothesisPrasugrel/ticagrelor, compared to clopidogrel, reduces risk of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) in Hong Kong ACS population.MethodsThe retrospective observational cohort study included patients admitted to seven institutions under Hospital Authority Hong Kong with diagnosis of ACS during 2008–2017. Risk of MACE, defined as composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, non‐fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and non‐fatal stroke, and risk of any bleeding leading to hospitalization were examined. Baseline characteristics difference was adjusted by propensity score (PS) matching. Adjusted Cox regression model was used to estimate hazard ratio of interested outcome.ResultsIn PS matched cohort including 944 patients in each group, MACE risk reduction of 40% from 1 year to 5 years after index ACS event was observed in prasugrel/ticagrelor group (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39–0.91, p = .015). The risk reduction was highly driven by MI reduction (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33–0.91, p = .019). Lower bleeding risk was observed in prasugrel/ticagrelor group compared to clopidogrel from 1 year to 5 years (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.21–1.00, p = .051).ConclusionsPrasugrel/ticagrelor showed MACE risk reduction over clopidogrel as part of DAPT up to 5 years after index event, while prasugrel/ticagrelor was not associated with increased bleeding risk.     

Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of miR-638 in cancer patients: A meta-analysis

Introduction:MiR-638 is believed to be involved in human cancers. However, the prognostic value of miR-638 in human carcinomas is controversial and inconclusive. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the association between miR-638 expression and clinical outcomes in the patients with various cancers.Methods:We searched Pubmed, Embase, Wanfang, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) up to September 1, 2020 to identify relevant studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to correlate expression of miR-638 with prognosis and clinicopathological features.Results:A total of 18 studies involving 1886 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The results revealed that low miR-638 expression was significantly correlated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.46–2.98, P < .001), but not with disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.71, 95% CI: 0.31–9.56, P = .540). Subgroup analysis found that low miR-638 expression was associated with worse OS in patients with digestive system cancer (HR = 2.47, 95% CI: 1.85–3.30, P < .001), the reported directly from articles group (HR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.34–3.33, P < .001), survival curves group (HR = 2.02, 95% CI: 1.07–3.80, P = .029), in studies with sample size ≥100 (HR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.34–3.35, P = .001), and in studies with sample size <100 (HR = 2.02, 95%CI: 1.09–3.75, P = .025). Moreover, cancer patients with low miR-638 expression were prone to tumor size (OR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.03–2.09, P = .035), earlier lymph node metastasis (present vs absent, OR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.63–3.14, P < .001), earlier distant metastasis (present vs absent, OR = 2.60, 95% CI: 1.45–4.67, P < .001), TNM stage (III-IV vs I-II, OR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.35–2.99, P = .001), and portal vein invasion (present vs absent, OR = 4.39, 95% CI:2.23–8.64, P < .001), but not associated with age, gender, tumor differentiation, and vascular invasion.Conclusions:MiR-638 may serve as a promising indicator in the prediction of prognosis and clinicopathological features in patients with different kinds of cancers.     

Pooled-analysis of efficacy and safety of minimally invasive versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Background:This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with renal and upper ureteric stones.Methods:We conducted a pooled analysis on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The eligible RCTs were selected from the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The reference lists of retrieved studies were also investigated.Results:Our analysis included 10 RCTs with 1612 patients. Pooled data from 10 RCTs revealed the following: stone-free rate (odds ratio = 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.12,1.88], P = .004), operative time (mean difference [MD]  = 4.10, 95% CI [–1.37,9.56], P = .14), length of hospital stay (MD = –15.31, 95% CI [–29.43,–1.19], P = .03), hemoglobin decrease (MD = –0.86, 95% CI [–1.19,–0.53], P < .00001), postoperative fever (MD = 0.83, 95% CI [0.49,1.40], P = .49), and urine leakage (MD = 0.59, 95% CI [0.25,1.37], P = .22). Besides, we performed sub-group analysis based on vacuum suction effect and multiple kidney stones. For vacuum suction effect, it revealed the following: stone-free rate in vacuum suction group (P = .007) and in non-vacuum suction group (P = .19). Operative time in vacuum suction group (P = .89), non-vacuum suction group (P = .16). Postoperative fever in vacuum suction group (P = .49), non-vacuum suction group (P = .85).Conclusion:This pooled analysis indicated that MPCNL was a safe and effective method for treating renal stones compared with standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Besides, the vacuum suction effect in MPCNL played a more important role. When it comes to multiple or staghorn stones, the longer operative time in MPCNL could not be ignored.     

Fertility-preserving treatment in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Endometrial cancer (EC) is the second most common malignancy of the female reproductive system worldwide, and the standard treatment for early-stage EC potentially leads to permanent infertility. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacies of different methods on fertility preservation in patients with early-stage EC.Methods:We searched the major online databases (PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) to collect the research literature on fertility preservation therapy in patients with early-stage well-differentiated EC aged ≤ 40 years from January 1999 to October 2019. The inclusion was performed using the R software (version R3.5.3) meta-analysis of a single rate. The efficacy of the following three fertility preservation treatments was evaluated from four aspects, the complete remission rate (CRR), recurrence rate (ReR), pregnancy rate (PregR), and live birth rate (LBR): a) taking oral progestin only therapy, b) hysteroscopic resection combined with progestin/levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS)/GnRH-a, c) LNG-IUS or combined with progestin/GnRH-a.Results:A total of 23 articles were included in this study, including 446 patients with early-stage EC. In the group that took oral progestin only (n = 279), CRR, ReR, PregR, and LBR were 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 74%–92%, P = .01), 38% (95% CI, 31%-45%, P = .35), 70% (95% CI, 62%–79%, P = .68), and 63% (95% CI, 55%–73%, P = .55), respectively. Hysteroscopic resection combined with progestin/LNG-IUS/GnRH-a therapy group (n = 96) achieved a CRR, ReR, PregR, and LBR of 95% (95% CI, 90%–100%, P = .42), 16% (95% CI, 6%–39%, P = .03), 84% (95% CI, 73%–96%, P = .39), and 72% (95% CI, 59%–87%, P = .28), respectively. LNG-IUS or combined with progestin/GnRH-a therapy group (n = 91) achieved a CRR, ReR, PregR, and LBR of 69% (95% CI, 54%–89%, P < .01), 30% (95% CI, 19%–49%, P = .36), 48% (95% CI, 18%–100%, P < .01), and 36% (95% CI, 10%–100%, P < .01), respectively.Conclusion:It is safe and effective for young patients with early-stage EC to receive oral progestin, hysteroscopic resection combined with progestin/LNG-IUS/GnRH-a, LNG-IUS, or progestin/GnRH-a.INPLASY Registration number:DOI 10.37766/inplasy2020.12.0137