Double free flaps in head and neck reconstruction

This article discusses the indications for and the advantages and principles of flap combinations and the selection of two pairs of recipient vessels for double free-flap transfers in reconstruction of extensive composite head and neck defects.     

Parascapular free flaps for head and neck reconstruction

We report our experience with single-stage, primary reconstruction of the head and neck in 29 consecutive patients using parascapular free flaps. The commonest indications were for craniofacial defects (9), oropharyngeal soft tissue defects (10), and combined mandibular and soft tissue losses (4). Ablative surgery was performed for squamous carcinoma (22), melanoma (2), and malignant fibrous histiocytoma (2). Seven patients died of recurrent disease during a 3 1/2 year follow-up. Seven patients are alive with recurrence. Flap complications included total loss (2) due to unsalvageable microvascular thrombosis, wound breakdown with oropharyngeal fistula (2), mandibular osteomyelitis (1), trismus (2), neck contracture (1), and donor site wound dehiscence (1). The overall success of this reconstruction was 93%. Primary wound healing was the general rule with lower morbidity than with other reconstructive techniques. The flap is thin, pliable, and conforms well to three-dimensional defects. The lateral border of the scapula can be incorporated on the same vascular pedicle for single-stage mandibular reconstruction. No muscle is sacrificed, and the posterior donor defect is an added advantage. The parascapular flap is our first choice for reconstruction of major defects in the head and neck.     

Muscle-sparing abdominal free flaps in head and neck reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Our aim in this retrospective case series was to review the indications, results, and complications of abdominal muscle-sparing free flaps in head and neck cancer reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review of all head and neck cancer defects reconstructed with abdominal muscle-sparing free tissue transfers from 1999 to 2004 was performed. Data collected included patient demographics, etiology and site of the defect, reconstructive technique, flap size, recipient vessels, complications, reconstructive technique, and clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Sixteen patients underwent reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap (n = 11), the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap (n = 4), or the superficial circumflex iliac artery (SCIA) flap (n = 1). Average age was 61 years (range, 41-77 years). The average hospital stay was 7.6 days (range, 6-14 days). The average defect size was 74.5 cm(2) (range, 30-240 cm(2)). No subsequent abdominal wall hernias or other donor site complications occurred after a mean follow-up of 21 months. CONCLUSIONS: Muscle-sparing abdominal free flaps are attractive options for head and neck cancer reconstruction. The SIEA and SCIA free flaps have the distinct advantage of eliminating abdominal hernias and other morbidity related to the excision of rectus abdominus fascia or muscle. In addition, the incisions are very low on the abdomen and are more cosmetically pleasing to the patient.     

Refinements in free flaps for head and neck reconstruction

The decade of adolescence of microsurgical techniques of head and neck reconstruction has led to a further clarification of the indications and methods for microsurgical reconstruction of head and neck defects. A review of the defects and the variety of flaps available for reconstruction leads to an increased understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of these various methods. When assessing a defect in the head and neck for microsurgical reconstruction, the surgeon should consider the various advantages of the flap to be used and weigh them against the disadvantages. The specialty has long since passed the point when one or two donor flaps could be considered to answer all of the reconstructive questions. We must now thoughtfully consider all the available options before settling on a course of treatment.     

Flow-through sequentially linked free flaps in head and neck reconstruction

Reconstructing extensive composite oromandibular defects is a difficult challenge. Many donor sites have been used including rib, second metatarsal, radius, scapula, iliac crest and fibula. Each of these flaps has advantages and disadvantages with regard to the donor defect, length of bone available, bone stock and reliability of the associated soft tissue. Additionally, a significant limitation in some patients is that the bone cannot be repositioned three-dimensionally with respect to the overlying skin island. The complex three-dimensional nature of composite resections may challenge the ability of any single osteocutaneous flap to adequately reconstruct all aspects of the resultant defect. To overcome this problem, the authors present a retrospective analysis of their experience with the flow-through sequentially linked free flaps concept for reconstruction of complex defects of head and neck in nine selected cases.     

Reinnervated radial forearm free flaps in head and neck reconstruction.

The radial forearm flap has proved to be a reliable free flap for intraoral reconstruction after major head and neck ablative surgery for cancer. In contrast to the myocutaneous flap, it is thin and flexible, and as a result, it is better suited to conforming to the irregular surface which remains over an intact or restored mandible. A criticism of both techniques however, is that while the flap effectively fills the defect, it serves as an insensate reservoir in which food and saliva can collect. A modification of the reinnervated radial forearm free flap is presented, with discussion of its use in three patients, following extensive resection of the floor of the mouth and tongue.     

Indications and outcomes of double free flaps in head and neck reconstruction

Objective. This study describes the clinical setting and operative outcomes for simultaneous double free flap treatment of extensive composite head and neck cancers. Methods. A retrospective review at two tertiary referral centers was performed. Patient demographics, cancer characteristics, reconstruction methods, and postoperative course were recorded. All patients were assessed for diet, speech, esthetics, socialization, and satisfaction using specific evaluation scales. Results. A total of 30 patients underwent double free flap reconstruction between 2001 and 2007. There were 19 men and 11 women, mean age of 62 years (range, 42–79). Comorbidities were present in 67% of the cases and 70% smoked. Most frequently the cancer was a squamous cell carcinoma (90%), in advanced stage (87%), and recurrent (67%), affecting the oral cavity (43%), larynx (23%) or pharynx (20%). The fibula osteoseptocutaneous/radial forearm fasciocutaneous flap combination was most commonly used (n = 13), followed by the jejunum‐radial forearm flap (n = 10). Three flaps required early anastomosis revision and only two partial flap losses were observed. In 11 cases, there was a severe recipient site complication: wound dehiscence (n = 3), oral incompetence (n = 4), fistula (n = 2), and stenosis (n = 2). Two patients died in the postoperative period due to medical problems (7%). The mean follow up was 15.3 months. Patient satisfaction was poor to moderate and the overall functional evaluation score was low. Conclusions. Double free flaps for one‐stage reconstruction of extensive head and neck defects should be used in selected cases. Although a reliable procedure, immediate postoperative morbidity and mortality is high, and the long‐term functional and esthetic results are modest. Realistic outcomes should be discussed with patients during planning and consent. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. Microsurgery, 2009.     

Myocutaneous flaps in head and neck reconstruction

Summary Our experience with two reliable myocutaneous flaps, the sternocleidomastoid and trapezius, is described with emphasis on their indication, anatomy and clinical application.     

Microvascular flaps in head and neck reconstruction

Twenty-six patients with head and neck tumors were submitted to 27 microvascular reconstructive procedures. In 15, the mandible was reconstructed using the rib (4), iliac crest (7), and scapula (4). Nine patients underwent craniofacial reconstructions with the latissimus dorsi (5), rectus abdominis (2), greater omentum (2), and scapular (1) flaps. Two patients received a jejunum (1) and a stomach plus greater omentum (1) flaps for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction. Three illustrative cases, one from each group, are presented in detail. Good results were obtained in 22 patients (85%), with both functional and morphological rehabilitation. There were five flap losses (two in the same patient) due to thrombosis of the microvascular anastomoses. There was no operative mortality, and the average operative time was 11 hours. The good results observed in these very advanced cases show that there is a place for these complex procedures in the treatment of selected cases of head and neck tumors.     

穿支游离皮瓣修复头颈肿瘤术后缺损

目的 探索更为理想的穿支游离皮瓣修复技术，运用于头颈肿瘤术后缺损。方法 2003年12月-2005年5月用于头颈部手术缺损修复的穿支游离皮瓣共14例（股前外侧皮瓣8例，腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣6例）。其中10例为复发后挽救手术，12例曾行放疗（平均63．5Gy）。头颈部肿瘤手术缺损部位分别为舌体3例，颊黏膜3例，口咽壁3例，舌根2例，颅底、头皮以及中面部各1例。受区供吻合动脉主要是甲状腺上动脉和面动脉；静脉为颈内静脉。结果 13例穿支游离皮瓣成功（93％），有1例穿支皮瓣因吻合侧的颈内静脉血栓形成导致皮瓣坏死。受区未发现其它明显并发症。供区均直接缝合关闭并一期愈合，未发现腹壁疝和运动受限等手术并发症。结论 穿支游离皮瓣保留了供区的肌肉、筋膜和神经，将供区的并发症降到最低限度，是头颈部缺损修复新的可靠技术。     

Myocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction

The recent development of myocutaneous flaps has ushered in an era of one-stage reconstructions, which have changed the patterns of surgery for head and neck cancer. This article reviews the development of these flaps and the clinical applications at various sites of the head and neck. Personal experience with 31 consecutive myocutaneous flaps confirms the versatility and reliability of these new techniques.     

Microsurgical workhorse flaps in head and neck reconstruction

The aim of reconstruction after resection of head and neck tumors is to achieve acceptable functional and esthetic results with minimal donor site morbidity. Although many flaps have been developed for bone and soft tissue reconstructions, our experience in the past years has identified the anterolateral thigh flap (cutaneous or myocutaneous), the radial forearm flap, and the osteoseptocutaneous fibula flap as the most useful flaps for head and neck reconstruction. These three flaps can be used for reconstruction of almost all kinds of defects, either as a single flap or in combination. The harvest of these flaps is relatively simple and straightforward. All flaps have adequate pedicle vessel length and caliber. Donor site morbidity is negligible. As most reconstructive microsurgeons do not have enough patient volume to master many different kinds of flaps in their professional life, we recommend focusing on these three flaps as workhorse flaps instead of hunting for many other flaps for head and neck reconstruction.     

Musculocutaneous flaps in head and neck reconstruction.

The introduction of musculocutaneous flaps to head and neck reconstructive surgery is described. The flaps available are listed, and the most important ones described and illustrated. Both the latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major flaps are felt to have a role in head and neck reconstruction, though they have largely been superseded by microvascular free flaps such as the radial forearm flap.     

Useful arterialized flaps for head and neck reconstruction

During the past 10 years, there have been extensive developments in both "island" muscle and musculocutaneous flaps and in "free" microvascular transfers. Competition still exists between these two schools of surgical methodology, even though both methods are known to be complementary and have comparable success rates. Each individual procedure has its commending features, and the reconstructive surgeon should be conversant with both techniques to plan the best reconstruction for each patient. It is therefore important first to place each local flap into context with other local flaps, so that comparisons can then be made with the several free microvascular flaps that are available.     

Cervicofacial and cervicothoracic rotation flaps in head and neck reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Compound cervicofacial and cervicothoracic rotation flaps are highly versatile flaps that may be applied to a variety of defects of the cheek, orbit, periauricular region, and neck. These rotation advancement flaps should be a staple of the head and neck surgeon's reconstructive armamentarium. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of medical records at a university-based head and neck cancer center. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were identified, with a mean age of 66 years. Primary or recurrent skin neoplasms made up the most common indication for surgery, followed by primary parotid tumors and cervical lymphatic metastases from upper aerodigestive tract malignancies. Defects of the cheek, orbit, periauricular region, and neck were reconstructed with cervicofacial or cervicothoracic flaps, with larger wounds requiring variable extension of the incision onto the chest wall. Other reconstructive modalities were used in 18 cases to increase tissue bulk or provide internal lining. Minor wound complications occurred in 13 patients. There was no statistically significant association between wound complications and smoking or previous radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Compound cervicofacial and cervicothoracic rotation flaps provide a straightforward, reliable, and efficient means to reconstruct complex defects of the face, lateral skull base, and neck, with the potential for excellent cosmetic results.