Comparison of speech perception performance between the nucleus 24 and nucleus 24 contour cochlear implant systems

Objective—To compare the 1-, 3-, and 6-month postoperative speech perception scores obtained by a group of subjects who received the new perimodiolar array (Nucleus Contour) cochlear implant with those obtained by a group of subjects implanted with the straight electrodes of the previous-generation Nucleus 24 device.

Material and Methods—The speech performance of 10 postlingually deafened adults implanted with the Nucleus Contour device was compared with that of matched controls who received the Nucleus 24 model. Objective measures included word and sentence speech recognition scores.

Results—Patients implanted with the Nucleus Contour device obtained significantly higher word and sentence recognition scores after short-term use of the implant compared to those obtained by patients implanted with the Nucleus 24 model.

Conclusion—Further long-term studies are required to determine whether the Nucleus Contour CI recipients continue to improve over time.     

Nucleus人工耳蜗弯电极和直电极植入后的心理物理指标比较

目的对比Nucleus CI 24导Contour弯电极与Nucleus CI 24导直电极植入后的电阻阻抗、刺激阈值和舒适阈。方法植入澳大利亚NucleuS人工耳蜗的患者分为2组,1组（19例）植入Nucleus CI 24导Contour电极阵列（弯电极）,另1组（11例）植入CI 24M电极阵列（直电极）。所有患者耳蜗植入术后15天开机调试,并于开机时及开机后1周、1月、3月分别记录各电极的电阻、刺激闽值和最大舒适阈。结果开机后由于Nucleus 24直电极的刺激阈值呈上升趋势,3月和6月时弯电极的阈值明显低于直电极阈值,且差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。开机1周、1月和6月2组的舒适阈接近。开机后弯电极和直电极的电阻值接近。结论Nucleus CI 24导Contour弯电极的刺激阈值稳定,刺激阈和舒适阈之间动态范围较宽。     

Comparison of speech perception benefits with SPEAK and ACE coding strategies in pediatric Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant recipients

Nine congenitally deaf children who received a Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant and who were fitted with the SPrint speech processor participated in this study. All subjects were initially programmed with the SPEAK coding strategy and then converted to the ACE strategy. Speech perception was evaluated before and after conversion to the new coding strategy using word and Common Phrase speech recognition tests in both the presence and absence of noise. In quiet conditions, the mean percent correct scores for words were 68.8% with SPEAK and 91% with ACE; for phrases the percentage was 66.6% with SPEAK and 85.5% with ACE. In the presence of noise (at +10 dB signal-to-noise ratio), the mean percent correct scores for words were 43.3% with SPEAK compared to 84.4% with ACE; for phrases the percentage was 41.1% with SPEAK and 82.2% with ACE. Statistical analysis revealed significant improvement in open-set speech recognition with ACE compared to SPEAK. Preliminary data suggest that converting children from SPEAK to the ACE strategy improves their performance. Subjects showed significant improvements for open-set word and sentence recognition in quiet as well as in noise when ACE was used in comparison with SPEAK. The greatest improvements were obtained when tests were presented in the presence of noise.     

Comparison of speech perception between monaural and binaural hearing in cochlear implant patients

Objective To assess the advantages of binaural hearing for cochlear implant (CI) users using a hearing aid (HA) for the contralateral ear.

Material and Methods The subjects comprised 3 males and 3 females (age range 48–84 years). All of them had been using a CI and HA for >6 months. Their speech perception was examined in quiet using monosyllables and Japanese Hearing in Noise Test (J-HINT) sentences. Speech perception in noise was examined using J-HINT sentences. Late cortical waves were measured while subjects listened to 1 kHz frequent and 2 kHz target tone stimuli. The latency of the event-related potential (P300) wave was compared for monaural and binaural hearing conditions.

Results Three subjects showed significantly better results for binaural than monaural (CI alone) hearing for monosyllables and HINT sentences (p<0.05; paired t-test). Subjects with better speech perception had been using an HA for longer than those with poor performance (18.3 vs 4.0 years). The overall average score was better for binaural than monaural hearing in the speech perception test under quiet and noisy conditions. Comparison of the latency of the P300 wave under monaural and binaural hearing conditions showed a significantly shorter latency for the latter (p=0.02; paired t-test).

Conclusion Although the use of an HA alone showed marginal benefit for CI users, binaural hearing (CI + HA) resulted in a significant improvement in speech perception under various circumstances.     

Comparison of speech perception between monaural and binaural hearing in cochlear implant patients

OBJECTIVE: To assess the advantages of binaural hearing for cochlear implant (CI) users using a hearing aid (HA) for the contralateral ear. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The subjects comprised 3 males and 3 females (age range 48-84 years). All of them had been using a CI and HA for > 6 months. Their speech perception was examined in quiet using monosyllables and Japanese Hearing in Noise Test (J-HINT) sentences. Speech perception in noise was examined using J-HINT sentences. Late cortical waves were measured while subjects listened to 1 kHz frequent and 2 kHz target tone stimuli. The latency of the event-related potential (P300) wave was compared for monaural and binaural hearing conditions. RESULTS: Three subjects showed significantly better results for binaural than monaural (CI alone) hearing for monosyllables and HINT sentences (p < 0.05; paired t-test). Subjects with better speech perception had been using an HA for longer than those with poor performance (18.3 vs 4.0 years). The overall average score was better for binaural than monaural hearing in the speech perception test under quiet and noisy conditions. Comparison of the latency of the P300 wave under monaural and binaural hearing conditions showed a significantly shorter latency for the latter (p = 0.02; paired t-test). CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of an HA alone showed marginal benefit for CI users, binaural hearing (CI+HA) resulted in a significant improvement in speech perception under various circumstances.     

A comparison of the growth of open-set speech perception between the nucleus 22 and nucleus 24 cochlear implant systems.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term development of open-set speech perception between implementations of the spectral peak (SPEAK) strategy in adults using the Nucleus 22 (N22) Spectra processor and the Nucleus 24 (N24) system with the SPrint processor. STUDY DESIGN: Two sets of patients with a follow-up period of 3 months were compared. SETTING: This study was conducted at the New York University (NYU) Medical Center. PATIENTS: Thirty-six profoundly hearing-impaired adults were included in this study. INTERVENTION: Sixteen adults received the N22 cochlear implant with the Spectra speech processor and twenty adults received the N24 cochlear implant with the SPrint speech processor. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Open-set speech perception for the patients with N22 implants was evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using the following measures: NU-6 monosyllabic words, Iowa sentences, and CID sentences. CNC words, CUNY sentences, and HINT sentences were used to assess the patients with N24 implants. RESULTS: Results revealed that the N22 and N24 cochlear implant recipients had significant open-set speech recognition 3 and 6 months after implantation. The apparent favorable absolute scores for the patients with N24 implants were equalized when a multivariate analysis was performed to account for their younger age at time of implantation and shorter length of deafness. CONCLUSIONS: The growth of open-set word and sentence recognition in similar between the N22 and N24 cochlear implants. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine if higher ceiling scores are present in the N24. Further exploration of monopolar versus bipolar stimulation is warranted.     

Comparison of two cochlear implant coding strategies on speech perception

Objective: Assess whether differences in speech perception are observed after exclusive listening experience with high-definition continuous interleaved sampling (HDCIS) versus fine structure processing (FSP) coding strategies.

Methods: Subjects were randomly assigned at initial activation of the external speech processor to receive the HDCIS or FSP coding strategy. Frequency filter assignments were consistent across subjects. The speech perception test battery included CNC words in quiet, HINT sentences in quiet and steady noise (+10?dB SNR), AzBio sentences in quiet and a 10-talker babble (+10?dB SNR), and BKB-SIN. Assessment intervals included 1, 3, and 6 months post-activation.

Results: Data from 22 subjects (11 with HDCIS and 11 with FSP) were assessed over time. Speech perception performance was not significantly different between groups.

Discussion: Speech perception performance was not significantly different after 6 months of listening experience with the HDCIS or FSP coding strategy.     

Residual speech perception and cochlear implant performance in postlingually deafened adults

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at testing the post-hoc validity of the previously reported predictive index for postoperative cochlear implant performance, based on preoperative duration of deafness, and speech reception. STUDY DESIGN: Adult patients with postlingual severe to profound hearing loss, who were implanted with Cochlear Corporation CI-22 and CI-24 devices were included in this study. We studied the relationship between their postoperative word recognition scores and preoperative factors, namely, duration of deafness, and sentence recognition. We used the same predictive index reported in the previous study to predict their postoperative scores and test the model's agreement with the actual performance. RESULTS: We found that postoperative performance as measured by CNC word scores had an inverse relationship with the duration of deafness, and a direct correlation with the preoperative performance on CID sentence recognition tests. A nonlinear term [Duration / (1+CID)] was shown to improve the correlation coefficient of our predictive index. CONCLUSION: Some predictability of cochlear implant outcome is possible depending on the preoperative duration of deafness and speech recognition abilities. Preoperative residual speech recognition acts as a "trophic factor" that protects the spiral ganglion and/ or the central auditory pathways from degeneration. In other words, it improves the expected postoperative word scores.     

Nucleus 24 Contour人工耳蜗植入术初步体会

目的 报道16例Nucleus24Contour人工耳蜗的手术方法和初步效果。方法 介绍Nucleus24Contour人工耳蜗手术方法、注意事项和结果,与Nucleus24M人工耳蜗植入后的编程调试结果(T-Level,C-Level)进行比较。结果 16例病人术后4～5次编程调试后,声场测听达到20～35dB(HL),平均24.4±5.8dB,C-level。T-Level和C-Level均比Nucleuse24M要小,动态范围比Nucleus24M大。结论 初步结果显示,Nucleus24Contour人工耳蜗性能比Nucleus24M型人工耳蜗有某些提高,但手术时应注意操作特点。     

Correlation between rCBF and speech perception in cochlear implant users.

OBJECTIVE: Although cochlear implants (CIs) have provided the opportunity for bilaterally deaf individuals to recover their hearing abilities, the speech perception performances of the CI users varies considerably. To elucidate the cortical mechanisms of processing speech signals coded by CIs, we evaluated the correlation between the brain activity during speech activation and speech perception in CI users by PET. METHODS: Fourteen postlingually deaf CI users were examined. CI used in the patients was a 22-channel system and its speech-coding strategy was the Nucleus spectral peak (SPEAK) strategy. To evaluate the speech perception performances, we examined vowel perception, consonant perception and speech tracking performances in the Japanese language. Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was measured during no sound stimulation and speech sound stimulation. PET data of the silent condition was subtracted from that of speech stimulation to determine changes in rCBF. In the search for changes in rCBF in the areas for auditory processing, three regions of interest (ROI) were selected; primary auditory area, auditory association area and Broca's area. The correlation between the rCBF changes in the ROIs and the speech perception performances was analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The patient's speech perception performances ranged widely. Although there were no significant correlations between the speech perception and the rCBF increases in the primary auditory area and Broca's area, there were positive correlations in the auditory association area. In the left auditory association area, the correlation coefficient of the vowel perception performance was 0.546 (P <0.05) and that of the speech-tracking test was 0.657 (P < 0.05). Regarding the consonant perception performance, the correlation coefficient was 0.743 (P < 0.01). There was a positive correlation only between the consonant perception performance and the rCBF increase (R = 0.576, P < 0.05) in the right auditory association area. These correlations are stronger in the left hemisphere than in the right hemisphere. CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that the improvement of the auditory processing of speech in CI users with SPEAK strategy is accompanied by the recruitment of more neurons in the auditory association areas. The adult auditory cortices may still have plasticity or     

Audiovisual speech perception in elderly cochlear implant recipients

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: This study examined the speech perception skills of a younger and older group of cochlear implant recipients to determine the benefit that auditory and visual information provides for speech understanding. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. METHODS: Pre- and postimplantation speech perception scores from the Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC), the Hearing In Noise sentence Test (HINT), and the City University of New York (CUNY) tests were analyzed for 34 postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant recipients. Half were elderly (i.e., >65 y old) and other half were middle aged (i.e., 39-53 y old). The CNC and HINT tests were administered using auditory-only presentation; the CUNY test was administered using auditory-only, vision-only, and audiovisual presentation conditions RESULTS: No differences were observed between the two age groups on the CNC and HINT tests. For a subset of individuals tested with the CUNY sentences, we found that the preimplantation speechreading scores of the younger group correlated negatively with auditory-only postimplant performance. Additionally, older individuals demonstrated a greater reliance on the integration of auditory and visual information to understand sentences than did the younger group CONCLUSIONS: On average, the auditory-only speech perception performance of older cochlear implant recipients was similar to the performance of younger adults. However, variability in speech perception abilities was observed within and between both age groups. Differences in speechreading skills between the younger and older individuals suggest that visual speech information is processed in a different manner for elderly individuals than it is for younger adult cochlear implant recipients.     

The effects of limiting the number of Nucleus 22 cochlear implant electrodes programmed on speech perception.

The purpose of this double-blind study was to evaluate systematically the effects of varying programmed electrodes on speech perception. The performance of five subjects implanted with the Nucleus 22-electrode cochlear implant was compared on the Four-Choice Spondee test, the Central Institute for the Deaf Sentence test, and Speech Tracking across the following conditions: (1) five most apical electrodes eliminated from the subject's MAP (stimulus parameters); (2) five most basal electrodes eliminated from subject's MAP; (3) the middle five electrodes eliminated from subject's MAP; and (4) subject's current MAP. Statistically significant differences were found for the Four-Choice Spondee test and both the auditory-only and auditory-plus-lipreading Speech Tracking measures. Three subjects demonstrated poorer performance on all test measures when the five electrodes from the apical portion of the array were not programmed. Two subjects performed equally well, regardless of MAP condition. Group means for all test measures present a trend of consistently poorer performance when the -5 Apex MAPs were utilized. A subjective rating scale was consistent with the perceptual tests, with all subjects best liking their current MAP and least liking the -5 Apex MAP. Results suggest that for some subjects, a fixed place code may control their ability to use spectral information for speech discrimination. For these subjects, first formant information (F1) traditionally coded on the most apical electrodes could not be utilized as effectively when coded on the adjacent middle electrodes.     

Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception

OBJECTIVE: Taking advantage of the flexibility in the number of stimulating electrodes and the stimulation rate in a modern cochlear implant, the present study evaluated relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues to cochlear implant speech perception. DESIGN: Four experiments were conducted by using a Research Interface Box in five MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant users. Experiment 1 varied the number of electrodes from four to twelve or the maximal number of available active electrodes while keeping a constant stimulation rate at 1000 Hz per electrode. Experiment 2 varied the stimulation rate from 1000 to 4000 Hz per electrode on four pairs of fixed electrodes. Experiment 3 covaried the number of stimulating electrodes and the stimulation rate to study the trade-off between spectral and temporal cues. Experiment 4 studied the effects of envelope extraction on speech perception and listening preference, including half-wave rectification, full-wave rectification, and the Hilbert transform. Vowels, consonants, and HINT sentences in quiet, as well as with a competing female voice served as test materials. RESULTS: Experiment 1 found significant improvement in all speech tests with a higher number of stimulating electrodes. Experiment 2 found a significant advantage of the high stimulation rate only on consonant recognition and sentence recognition in noise. Experiment 3 found an almost linear trade-off between the number of stimulation electrodes and the stimulation rate for consonant and sentence recognition in quiet, but not for vowel and sentence recognition in noise. Experiment 4 found significantly better performance with the Hilbert transform and the full-wave rectification than the half-wave rectification. In addition, envelope extraction with the Hilbert transform produced the highest rating on subjective judgment of sound quality. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with previous studies, the present result from the five MED-EL subjects showed that (1) the temporal envelope cues from a limited number of channels are sufficient to support high levels of phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet but not for speech recognition in a competing voice, (2) consonant recognition relies more on temporal cues while vowel recognition relies more on spectral cues, (3) spectral and temporal cues can be traded to some degree to produce similar performance in cochlear implant speech recognition, and (4) the Hilbert envelope improves both speech intelligibility and quality in cochlear implants.     

The mechanism of speech perception using multichannel cochlear implant

The mechanism of speech perception in patients with Australian multi-channel cochlear implant was investigated. 1) Vowel recognition abilities of patients were sufficient with this implant, whereas, consonant recognition abilities were insufficient. 2) Although the cochlear hair cells were functionally damaged, cochlear nerves had the ability to characterize frequency. 3) The signals from the implanted material were very simple compared to those from normal cochlea, however these patients could understand speech well, perhaps due to aid from the central nervous system.     

Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of varying electrical stimulation rate on speech comprehension by cochlear implant users, while keeping the number of stimulated channels constant. DESIGN: Three average rates of electrical stimulation, 250, 807, and 1615 pulses per second per channel (pps/ch), were compared using a speech processing strategy that employed an electrode selection technique similar to that used in the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor strategy (McDermott, McKay, & Vandali, 1992; McDermott & Vandali, Reference Note 1; McKay, McDermott, Vandali, & Clark, 1991) and the Spectral Peak strategy (Skinner et al., 1994; Whitford et al., 1995). Speech perception tests with five users of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system were conducted over a 21-wk period. Subjects were given take-home experience with each rate condition. A repeated ABC evaluation protocol with alternating order was employed so as to account for learning effects and to minimize order effects. Perception of open-set monosyllabic words in quiet and open-set sentences at signal to noise ratios ranging from +20 to 0 dB, depending on the subject's ability, were tested. A comparative performance questionnaire was also administered. RESULTS: No statistical differences in group performance between the 250 and 807 pps/ch rates were observed in any of the speech perception tests. However, significantly poorer group performance was observed for the 1615 pps/ch rate for some tests due predominantly to the results of one subject. Analysis of individual scores showed considerable variation across subjects. For some subjects, one or more of the three rate conditions evaluated provided benefits on some speech perception tasks. The results of the comparative performance questionnaire indicated a preference for the 250 and 807 pps/ch rates over the 1615 pps/ch rate for most listening situations. CONCLUSIONS: For the speech processing strategy, implant system, and subjects evaluated in this study, the group results indicated that the use of electrical stimulation rates higher than 250 pps/ch (up to 1615 pps/ch) generally provided no significant improvement to speech comprehension. However, individual results indicated that perceptual benefits could be obtained by adjusting rate of stimulation optimally to suit each subject. Results from one subject, together with tinnitus problems arising from high-rate stimulation for another subject, indicated that high rates of stimulation may in fact be undesirable for some subjects.     

Speech perception with the ACE and the SPEAK speech coding strategies for children implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine whether implanted children using the ACE speech coding strategy demonstrate superior performances compared to implanted children using the SPEAK speech coding strategy over time. METHODS: Cochlear implanted children with prelinguistic sensorineural bilateral deafness of profound degree, using either the ACE or SPEAK coding strategy, were evaluated and compared. Both groups of children used one of the speech coding strategies continuously from the initial programming session and for a period of 2 years post-switch-on. One group comprised children who were retrospectively implanted and had received the SPEAK speech coding strategy (n=32) and the second group consisted of prospectively implanted children who received the ACE speech coding strategy (n=26). Both populations were homogenous as far as age of implantation, degree of hearing loss, anatomy of the cochlea, depth of electrode insertion, and educational and rehabilitative support provided. Children were assessed at 6, 12 and 24 months post switch-on via pure-tone audiometry and for speech perception tests. Children using the ACE speech coding strategy were additionally evaluated using the MAIS and MUSS language scales. RESULTS: Satisfactory benefits in speech perception were demonstrated by both groups of implanted children. No significant difference between the mean pure tone thresholds was observed postoperatively between the groups. Two years post switch-on the group using the ACE speech coding strategy demonstrated superior results for vowel discrimination in comparison to children using the SPEAK coding strategy. No significant difference was observed between the groups for performance on discrimination of syllable patterns (ESP) or for disyllablic word recognition tests. Additionally, the group of ACE users demonstrated maximum performance on MAIS and MUSS scales, 2 years post switch-on. CONCLUSIONS: The results clearly demonstrate significant benefit of cochlear implantation in prelinguistically deafened children for speech perception ability when using either the SPEAK or ACE speech coding strategies. Children using the ACE speech coding strategy demonstrate more rapid progress in improved speech perception ability initially, however 2 years post switch-on, no significant difference in performance on open-set speech recognition tests can be noted irrespective of the strategy in use.     

European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the preservation of residual hearing in subjects who received the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant. To investigate the performance benefits up to one year post-implantation in terms of speech recognition, sound quality, and quality of life. Design: Prospective, with sequential enrolment and within-subject comparisons. Post-operative performance using a Freedom Hybrid sound processor was compared with that of pre-operative hearing aids. Study sample: Sixty-six adult hearing-impaired subjects with bilateral severe-to-profound high frequency hearing loss. Results: Group median increase in air-conduction thresholds in the implanted ear for test frequencies 125–1000 Hz was < 15 dB across the population; both immediately and one year post-operatively. Eighty-eight percent of subjects used the Hybrid processor at one year post-op. Sixty-five percent of subjects had significant gain in speech recognition in quiet, and 73% in noise (≥ 20 percentage points/2 dB SNR). Mean SSQ subscale scores were significantly improved (+ 1.2, + 1.3, + 1.8 points, p < 0.001), as was mean HUI3 score (+ 0.117, p < 0.01). Combining residual hearing with CI gave 22?26 %age points mean benefit in speech recognition scores over CI alone (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Useful residual hearing was conserved in 88% of subjects. Speech perception was significantly improved over preoperative hearing aids, as was sound quality and quality of life.     

Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users

Cochlear implantation is generally accepted as a successful means of restoring auditory sensation to profoundly deaf individuals. Although most patients can expect a satisfactory outcome following implantation, some have poor speech perception outcomes. This investigation used [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to measure cortical activity resulting from auditory stimulation in seven 'good' and four 'poor' cochlear implant recipients. Activations were significantly greater in both the primary and association cortices in the good compared with the poor implant users. We suggest that the ability to access the more specialised speech processing abilities of the auditory association cortices helps determine outcome following cochlear implantation.