Medical students are from Mars--business and psychology students are from Venus--- University teachers are from Pluto?

This study explores further the reasons given by the first year medical students in comparison with first year business and first year psychology students for their selection of lectures, student role play, and student presentations as their least preferred teaching method. The reasons were originally given in a questionnaire exploring student expectations of university teaching completed by 195 medical, 128 business and 72 psychology students in their first week at university (Sander et al, 2000). The analysis reported here suggests that whilst students irrespective of course gave similar reasons for not liking lectures, there were subtle differences between medical students and business and psychology students in the reasons they gave for not liking student role play and student presentations. These differences suggest that many first year medical students can be suspicious of the value of student centred learning methods. Teachers hoping to use these methods should acknowledge student suspicion and work to help students see the value of these techniques to encourage their full participation.     

What do medical students actually do on clinical rotations?

As medical schools make use of an increasing variety of clinical teaching settings, it is of interest to find that that there is very little published research that explores the actual learning activities undertaken by students in different environments. This study was designed to describe and analyse a typical week for students learning the same curricular material in one of three Australian settings: an urban tertiary teaching hospital, a remote secondary referral hospital and a rural community-based programme. Twenty-eight students completed week-long learning logs in weeks 9 and 35 of a 40-week academic year. Each student recorded his or her activity in 15-minute intervals for each week. Analysis of these data revealed that, compared with the hospital-based students, the community-based students reported greater patient contact, more time spent in clinical settings and increased time supervised by experienced clinicians. Whilst the community-based students valued their learning in clinical settings more highly than the learning they undertook at their home, the opposite was found for the tertiary hospital-based students. This study, the first to compare student activity in these three prototypical settings in the medical education literature, provides empirical evidence supporting community-based programmes as credible alternatives to traditional teaching hospital-based environments.     

Empathy training in medical students – a randomized controlled trial

Aim: Empathy is a core element in the doctor–patient relationship. This study examined whether empathy in medical students can be improved by specific training.

Methods: 158 medical students were randomized into two groups. The intervention group participated in an empathy skills training with simulated patients (SPs). The control group participated in a history course. After the intervention, empathy was assessed by blinded SPs and experts in an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Students also filled out a self-assessment concerning their attitude on empathy (Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy Student Version, JSPE-S-S).

Results and Conclusions: Participants of the intervention group showed significantly higher levels of empathy when rated by SPs and experts than the control group. In contrast to that, no significant group differences were observed in self-rated empathy. The results underpin the value of empathy skills trainings in medical school study programs.     

What to do about medical students with unsatisfactory consultation skills?

If it is accepted that new doctors must be 'Fit to Practice' in a standard clinical house job, they should be competent in basic communication skills. Although these skills may be assessed as part of a routine OSCE-style exam in the course of the curriculum, the question is raised whether students who fail to demonstrate a minimal level of competence in this area should to be allowed to progress to the next stage of the course and eventually graduate. This paper describes our experiences with introducing 'barrier' stations in communication skills into the OSCE. Students who failed these stations, irrespective of their overall exam performance, undertook remedial studies in a compulsory two-week directed study module followed by a four-station OSCE.     

Can students differentiate between PBL tutors with different tutoring deficiencies?

Many medical schools evaluate the performance of their tutors by using questionnaires. One of the aims of these evaluations is to provide tutors with diagnostic feedback on strong and weak aspects of their performance. Although everyone will agree that students are able to distinguish between poor and excellent tutors, one can question whether students are also able to differentiate between tutors with different tutoring deficiencies--tutors who perform badly on a specific key aspect of their performance. The aim of this study was to investigate to what degree students are able to differentiate between tutors with different tutoring deficiencies, how effective tutors are with different deficiencies and what kind of tips students give for improvement of a tutor's behaviour. Based on students' ratings on a tutor evaluation questionnaire, tutors were ranked in groups with different deficiencies and the average overall tutor performance score was computed for each group with a particular deficiency. In addition, students' tips for improvement given in the open-ended question at the end of the questionnaire were analysed. The results demonstrated that on average one out of five tutors showed a deficiency on only one key aspect. Tutors who did not stimulate students towards active learning were perceived as least effective. Furthermore, students' tips for improvement could be categorized into four groups: tutors who do not evaluate adequately, tutors who are too directive, tutors who are too passive and tutors who lack content knowledge. The results of this study demonstrate that students are not only able to distinguish between poor and excellent tutors, but are also able to diagnose tutors with different tutoring deficiencies and are able to provide tutors with specific feedback to improve their performance.     

Exploring educational interventions to facilitate health professional students’ professionally safe online presence

Objective: To establish the most effective approach and type of educational intervention for health professional students, to enable them to maintain a professionally safe online presence.

Method: This was a qualitative, multinational, multi-institutional, multiprofessional study. Practical considerations (availability of participants) led us to use a combination of focus groups and individual interviews, strengthening our findings by triangulating our method of data collection. The study gathered data from 57 nursing, medical and paramedical students across four sites in three countries (Aotearoa/New Zealand, Australia and Wales). A content analysis was conducted to clarify how and why students used Facebook and what strategies they thought might be useful to ensure professional usage. A series of emergent codes were examined and a thematic analysis undertaken from which key themes were crystallized.

Results: The results illuminated the ways in which students use social networking sites (SNS). The three key themes to emerge from the data analysis were negotiating identities, distancing and risks. Students expressed the wish to have material about professional safety on SNS taught to them by authoritative figures to explain “the rules” as well as by peers to assist with practicalities. Our interactive research method demonstrated the transformative capacity of the students working in groups.

Conclusions: Our study supports the need for an educational intervention to assist health professional students to navigate SNS safely and in a manner appropriate to their future roles as health professionals. Because health professional students develop their professional identity throughout their training, we suggest that the most appropriate intervention incorporate small group interactive sessions from those in authority, and from peers, combined with group work that facilitates and enhances the students’ development of a professional identity.