十二指肠溃疡患者根除幽门螺杆菌后抑酸维持治疗的疗效研究

背景：对感染幽门螺杆菌（H.pylori）的消化性溃疡患者成功根除且H.ylori后,是否应继续行抑酸治疗,目前尚存在争议。目的：探讨合并H.pylori感染的十二指肠溃疡（DU）患者根除H.pylori后抑酸维持治疗的疗效。方法：112例合并H.pylori感染的DU患者随机分为A组和B组,A组给予10d四联疗法：兰索拉唑30mg＋阿莫西林1g＋克拉霉素0．5gbid＋枸橼酸铋钾110mg qid,疗程10d。B组：在A组方案的基础上,疗程结束后再予兰索拉唑30mg,1次／d,维持4周。治疗结束4周后复查胃镜,评估H.pylori根除疗效、溃疡愈合率和腹痛缓解率。结果：109例患者完成方案。A、B两组按意向治疗（ITT）和按方案（PP）分析的H.pylori根除率（ITT：85．7％对87．5％;PP：88．9％对89．1％）和溃疡愈合率（ITT：87．5％对94．6％;PP：90．7％对96．4％）以及腹痛缓解率（95．6％对95．7％）相比差异均无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论：以10d四联疗法根除H.pylori后,可使多数DU患者的溃疡愈合,无需进一步行维持抑酸治疗。     

Maintenance treatment is not necessary after Helicobacter pylori eradication and healing of bleeding peptic ulcer: a 5-year prospective, randomized, controlled study

BACKGROUND: It is well accepted that in patients with uncomplicated peptic ulcers, Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy does not need to be followed by further antisecretory treatment. However, it is uncertain whether patients with bleeding peptic ulcers should receive maintenance antiulcer therapy after successful H pylori eradication and ulcer healing. The aim of this 5-year, prospective, randomized, controlled study was to investigate the role of long-term maintenance therapy after successful H pylori eradication and healing of bleeding ulcers. METHODS: A total of 82 consecutive patients with H pylori-associated bleeding peptic ulcers were enrolled in the study. After successful H pylori eradication with the 1-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy and an additional 3-week treatment with 20 mg of omeprazole daily for ulcer healing, the patients were assigned to one of four 16-week maintenance treatment groups as follows: group A received 15 mL of an antacid suspension 4 times daily; group B received 300 mg of colloidal bismuth subcitrate 4 times daily; group C received 20 mg of famotidine twice daily; and group D, the control group, received placebo twice daily. Follow-up included an urea breath test labeled with carbon 13, biopsy-based tests, and repeated endoscopic examination. RESULTS: An analysis of variance revealed no difference in mean age and mean follow-up time among the groups. During a mean follow-up of 56 months, there was no peptic ulcer recurrence among the 3 treatment groups, and all of the patients remained free of H pylori infection during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with bleeding peptic ulcers, antiulcer maintenance treatment was not necessary to prevent ulcer recurrence after successful H pylori eradication and ulcer healing. In addition, the 1-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy had the efficacy to ensure long-term eradication of H pylori in a region of high prevalence.     

Triple therapy for 7 days vs. triple therapy for 7 days plus omeprazole for 21 days in treatment of active duodenal ulcer with Helicobacter pylori infection: A double blind placebo controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The current treatment for active duodenal ulcer implies a 4 weeks course with anti-secretory drugs and two antibiotics for 7 to 10 days in the case of Helicobacter pylori infection. AIM: To establish whether triple therapy with omeprazole given for 7 days with two antibiotics eradicates H. pylori, heals and prevents ulcer recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 103 patients with active duodenal ulcer and H. pylori were randomly divided into: a group of 50 patients treated with omeprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole for 7 days followed by omeprazole for 21 days, and a group of 53 patients who received the same treatment as the previous group, followed by placebo for 21 days. Endoscopy with quick urease test, histology and culture was performed at entry and after 4 and 16 weeks. RESULTS: Ulcer healing rate after 16 weeks' treatment was 95% in the former and 96% in the latter group (ns). Eradication after 16 weeks was 84% in the former and 83% in the latter group (ns). At 56 weeks, all patients examined were ulcer free and without H. pylori. CONCLUSION: Omeprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole for 7 days heals active duodenal ulcer and eradicates H. pylori infection in most patients. Treatment extension with omeprazole, for 3 weeks, after triple therapy does not modify healing and eradication rates.     

One week of treatment with esomeprazole-based triple therapy eradicates Helicobacter pylori and heals patients with duodenal ulcer disease.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) monotherapy is commonly continued for 3 weeks after Helicobacter pylori eradication with PPI-based triple therapy regimens to ensure duodenal ulcer (DU) healing. This randomized, double-blind, multicentre study evaluated whether only 1 week of triple therapy with the new PPI esomeprazole was sufficient to ensure high rates of ulcer healing and H. pylori eradication. METHODS: A total of 446 H. pylori-positive patients with active DU received twice daily treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg (n = 222) or omeprazole 20 mg (n = 224) in combination with amoxicillin 1 g and clarithromycin 500 mg for 1 week (EAC and OAC, respectively). Patients in the OAC group then received 3 weeks' monotherapy with omeprazole 20 mg once daily; those treated with EAC received placebo. Ulcer healing was assessed by endoscopy on completion of therapy and H. pylori status was assessed by (13)C-urea breath testing and histology 4-6 weeks later. RESULTS: Ulcer healing rates (95% CI) for intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations were: EAC + placebo 91% (87-95%) and 94% (90-97%); OAC + omeprazole 92% (88-95%) and 96% (92-98%). Corresponding H. pylori eradication rates were: EAC + placebo 86% (81-90%) and 89% (84-93%); OAC + omeprazole 88% (83-92%) and 90% (85-93%). Both eradication regimens were well tolerated, and patient compliance was high. CONCLUSIONS: A 1-week regimen of esomeprazole-based triple therapy is sufficient for DU healing and H. pylori eradication in patients with DU disease.     

Comparative study of modified-release clarithromycin and immediate-release clarithromycin in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy containing immediate-release clarithromycin is an important regimen for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). However, the efficacy of modified-release clarithromycin for the treatment of H. pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease is still unknown. The aims of the study were to compare the efficacy of modified-release clarithromycin and immediate-release clarithromycin on the rates of ulcer healing and eradication of H. pylori. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and sixty-one patients with Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer were randomized to receive one-week triple therapy with either modified-release clarithromycin 1000mg once daily (AECMR) or immediate-release clarithromycin 500mg twice daily (AECIR) in combination with amoxicillin 1,000mg twice daily (A) and esomeprazole 40mg once daily (E). Post-treatment ulcer healing status and Helicobacter pylori status was determined by endoscopy and 13C urea-breath test at 16 weeks and 8 weeks after completion of triple therapy, respectively. RESULTS: Helicobacter pylori eradication rates were 87.5% and 87.7% for AECMR and AECIR, respectively, in the intent-to-treat analysis. Eradication rates in the per-protocol groups were 90.3% and 91.4% for AECMR and AECIR, respectively. In both the intent-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, the eradication rates were comparable in the AECMR and AECIR groups (p= 1.0 and 1.0, respectively). Ulcer healing rates in the intention-to-treat analysis were 81.3% and 77.8% for AECMR and AECIR, respectively. Ulcer healing rates in the per-protocol analysis were 90.3% and 90.0% for AECMR and AECIR groups, respectively. In both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, the ulcer healing rates were comparable in the AECMR and AECIR groups (p=0.645 and 0.584, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Modified-release clarithromycin 1000mg once daily can be used as an alternative to immediate-release clarithromycin 500mg twice daily for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease.     

Helicobacter pylori eradication versus one-year maintenance therapy: effect on relapse and gastritis outcome.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine ulcer healing and H. pylori eradication rates obtained with triple therapy (omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin). Ulcer relapsing rate one year after eradication was also assessed. Maintenance therapy with placebo was compared with ranitidine therapy and the effect of eradication on histological variables of the gastric mucosa was studied. METHODS: A prospective, double-blind parallel study was performed in 85 patients endoscopically diagnosed of duodenal ulcer H. pylori positive. Patients were randomized to a 7-days triple therapy (group A) or omeprazole plus antibiotic placebo (group B). All patients were treated only with omeprazole for the next three weeks. Patients with ulcer healing after treatment were entered in a one-year follow up phase with ranitidine placebo (group A) or ranitidine (group B). Endoscopy and biopsies were performed at baseline, after treatment (5 weeks) and after 12 months of follow-up or when relapsing symptoms appeared. RESULTS: Healing rate was 90.2% in group A and 85.7% in group B. Eradication rate was 78% in group A and 0% in group B. Out of 37 healed patients in group A, eradication was achieved in 29 and only one relapse was found (3.4%). Three out of eight patients with healing but without eradication relapsed at 12 months (35%) (p < 0.05). Histopathological results showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between eradicated and non eradicated patients in terms of severity of inflammation and intestinal metaplasia, but not in terms of atrophy. CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori eradication is useful to prevent ulcer relapse and to improve gastric mucosa status.     

One-week low-dose triple therapy without anti-acid treatment has sufficient efficacy on Helicobacter pylori eradication and ulcer healing

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of a 1-week low-dose proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy without further acid suppression for cure of Helicobacter pylori infection and the ulcer healing in peptic ulcer disease. METHODOLOGY: Patients with endoscopically proven peptic ulcers who were H. pylori positive participated in this study. All patients were treated for 1 week with omeprazole 20 mg b.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. and tinidazole 500 mg b.d., then patients were treated randomly for another 4 weeks with either omeprazole 20 mg once daily (OCM-O group; n = 40) or without acid suppressing agents (OCM group; n = 39). Patients were investigated endoscopically for H. pylori and ulcer status before treatment, four weeks (week 5) and 8 weeks later (week 9) after anti-H. pylori treatment. H. pylori infection was assessed by rapid urease test and histology. RESULTS: The eradication rates of H. pylori were 72.5% (95% CI: 59-86%) and 76.3% (95% CI: 63-90%) by intention-to-treat analysis and by per protocol analysis respectively in the OCM-O group and were 87.2% (95% CI: 77-98%) and 97.1% (95% CI: 92-100%) by intention-to-treat analysis and by per protocol analysis respectively in the OCM group (p < 0.05 in per protocol analysis). In respect to ulcer healing status at week 5, 89.5% (34/38) of patients in the OCM-O group and 80% (28/35) of patients in the OCM group had healed ulcers; at week 9, 86.8% (33/38) of patients in the OCM-O group and 88.6% (31/35) of patients in the OCM group had healed ulcers (p = NS). When the ulcer status was analyzed in relation to the H. pylori status, at week 5 ulcer had healed in 84.4% (54/64) of patients with clearance of H. pylori infection and in 88.9% (8/9) of those with persistent infection. At week 9, ulcer healing increased up to 93.8% (60/64) of patients with clearance of H. pylori infection and decreased to 44.4% (4/9) of patients with persistent infection. The adverse events (20%) were mild in these two treatment groups and no patients required discontinuation of the study medications. CONCLUSIONS: Continuation of antisecretory drug therapy beyond a one-week low-dose triple therapy consisting of omeprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole is actually excessive regarding eradication efficacy and peptic ulcer healing.     

Efficacy of omeprazole and amoxicillin with either clarithromycin or metronidazole on eradication of Helicobacter pylori in Chinese peptic ulcer patients

AIM: One-week triple therapy with proton pump inhibitors, clarithromycin and amoxicillin has recently been proposed as the first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection; however, data regarding the effects of this regimen in China are scarce. The aim of this prospective and randomized study was to compare the efficacy of clarithromycin and metronidazole when they were combined with omeprazole and amoxicillin on eradication of H pylori and ulcer healing in Chinese peptic ulcer patients. METHODS: A total of 103 subjects with Hpylori-positive peptic ulcer were randomly divided into two groups, and accepted triple therapy with omeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1 000 mg and either clarithromycin 500 mg (OAC group, n = 58) or metronidazole 400 mg (0AM group, n - 45). All drugs were given twice daily for 7 d. Patients with active peptic ulcer were treated with omeprazole 20 mg daily for 2-4 wk after anti-H pylori therapy. Six to eight weeks after omeprazole therapy, all patients underwent endoscopies and four biopsies (two from the antrum and two others from the corpus of stomach) were taken for rapid urease test and histological analysis (with modified Giemsa staining) to examine H pylori. Successful eradication was defined as negative results from both examination methods. RESULTS: One hundred patients completed the entire course of therapy and returned for follow-up. The eradication rate of H pylori for the per-protocol analysis was 89.3% (50/56) in OAC group and 84.1% (37/44) in 0AM group. Based on the intention-to-treat analysis, the eradication rate of H pylori was 86.2% (50/58) in OAC group and 82.2% (37/45) in 0AM group. There were no significant differences in eradication rates between the two groups on either analysis. The active ulcer-healing rate was 96.7% (29/30) in OAC group and 100% (21/21) in 0AM group (per-protocol analysis, P>0.05). Six patients in OAC group (10.3%) and five in OAM group (11.1%) reported adverse events (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: One-week triple therapy with omeprazole and amoxicillin in combination with either clarithromycin or metronidazole is effective for the eradication of H pylori. The therapeutic regimen comprising metronidazole with low cost, good compliance and mild adverse events may offer a good choice for the treatment of peptic ulcers associated with H pylori infection in China.     

Ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapy for seven days, with or without further anti-secretory therapy, is highly effective in patients with duodenal ulcer and Helicobacter pylori infection

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of two protocols for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection and the healing of active duodenal ulcer: (i) ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) plus two antibiotics for 7 days, and (ii) the same triple therapy followed by 3 weeks of anti-secretory drug treatment. METHODS: The study comprised 102 patients with active duodenal ulcer and H. pylori infection; the patients were randomized to open treatment with either RBC 400 mg b.d. plus amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. for 7 days, or the same treatment followed by 3 weeks of RBC 400 mg b.d. alone. Ulcer healing was confirmed by endoscopy. H. pylori eradication was assessed by endoscopy, rapid urease test and histology. RESULTS: The ulcer healed in 48/50 patients on RBC-based triple therapy alone (96.0%) and in 51/52 patients on triple therapy plus further anti-secretory treatment (98.1%). On an intention-to-treat basis, H. pylori had been successfully eradicated in 42/50 patients on triple therapy (84.0%) and in 44/52 patients on triple therapy plus anti-secretory treatment (84.6%), while by per protocol analysis the H. pylori eradication rates were 91.3% (42/46) and 89.8% (44/49), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: One-week triple therapy with RBC, amoxycillin and clarithromycin is highly effective in eradicating H. pylori and healing duodenal ulcers, even if not followed by anti-secretory drug treatment.     

Amoxicillin plus omeprazole versus triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer disease: a prospective, randomized, and controlled study.

Treatment with amoxicillin and omeprazole resulted in encouraging Helicobacter pylori eradication rates in pilot studies that included medium term follow up. These results were evaluated in a prospective, randomised and controlled study. Forty patients with active duodenal ulcer disease and H pylori colonisation of the gastric mucosa were randomly assigned to receive either omeprazole (20 mg twice daily) and amoxicillin suspension (500 mg four times daily) for two weeks (group I) or bismuth subsalicylate (600 mg three times daily), metronidazole (400 mg three times daily), tetracycline (500 mg three times daily), and ranitidine (300 mg in the evening) for two weeks (group II). Study medication was followed in both groups by a four week treatment course with 300 mg ranitidine up to the final examination. One patient from each group was lost to follow up. H pylori was eradicated in 78.9% of group I and 84.2% of group II (p = 1.00). All ulcers in patients on omeprazole plus amoxicillin healed but in the triple treatment group four patients had residual peptic lesions after six weeks (ulcer healing rate: 78.9%, p = 0.11). Complete pain relief occurred after a median duration of 1 day in group I and of 6 days in group II (p = 0.03). There were no major complications in either group but minor side effects were more frequently recorded in patients on triple therapy (63.2% v 15.8%, p < 0.01). In conclusion, two weeks of treatment with omeprazole plus amoxicillin is as good as triple therapy plus ranitidine in eradicating H pylori but seems better with regard to safety, pain relief, and ulcer healing. Thus, amoxicillin plus omeprazole should be recommended as the treatment of choice in eradicating H pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer disease.     

雷贝拉唑与奥美拉唑短程三联或四联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的随机对照研究

目的　评估雷贝拉唑 (R)与奥美拉唑 (O)在含有克拉霉素 (C)和阿莫西林 (A)的短程三联或加用呋喃唑酮 (F)的超短程四联根除幽门螺杆菌 (Hp)方案中的疗效。 方法　将 180例Hp阳性、内镜检查确诊为消化性溃疡或非溃疡性消化不良的患者随机分为雷贝拉唑治疗组 (R组 )和奥美拉唑对照组 (O组 )。R组和O组又分别分为RAC 7天 /OAC 7天组、RAC 5天 /OAC 5天组和RACF 3天 /OACF 3天组 ,每天服药 2次 ,疗程分别为 7天、5天和 3天。各组患者在治疗前 1周内和治疗后 4～ 8周分别经内镜活组织学检查、快速尿素酶试验和1 3 C UBT检测Hp感染状况并评估溃疡合情况。结果　在Hp根除率方面 ,根据意图治疗分析 (ITT)和按试验方案 (PP)分析 ,R组总的Hp根除率均显著高于O组 (P <0 .0 5 ) ;RACF 3天的Hp根除率显著高于OACF 3天组 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,OACF 3天组的Hp根除率显著低于OAC 7天组 (P <0 .0 1)和OAC 5天组 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,RACF 3天组与RAC 7天组和RAC 5天组比较差异无显著性。各组间溃疡愈合率比较差异无显著性。结论　雷贝拉唑与阿莫西林、克拉霉素联合的短程三联或与阿莫西林、克拉霉素和呋喃唑酮联合的短程四联疗法具有良好的耐受性 ,其超短程四联 3天疗法的Hp根除率和溃疡愈合率均接近于三联 7天和 5天疗法 ,显著优于以     

雷贝拉唑三联疗法治疗消化性溃疡66例疗效观察

126例消化性溃疡患者随机分成对照组60例应用雷贝拉唑10mg qd，疗程4周；治疗组66例应用雷贝拉唑10mg qd，疗程4周，阿莫西林0．75g tid、克托霉素0．5g bid，疗程1周。两组溃疡愈合率均达100％；治疗组H．pylori清除率95．5％，对照组25％；随诊所有患者2月、1年溃疡复发率，治疗组分别为6．7％、9．1％，对照组分别为33．3％、58．3％；无药物不良反应。结果表明雷贝拉唑三联疗法疗程短、高效、依从性好，无药物副作用，使用方便，溃疡复发率低。     

Effects of killing Helicobacter pyloriquadruple therapy on peptic ulcer： A randomized double-blind clinical trial

AIM: To study the therapeutic efficacy of a Chinese and Western integrated regimen, killing Helicobacter pylori quadruple therapy on H pylori-associated peptic ulcers (PU). METHODS: With prospective and double-blind controlled method, seventy-five active PU patients with H pylori infection were randomized to receive one of the following three regimens: (1) new triple therapy (group A: lansoprazole 30 mg qd, plus clarithromycin 250 mg bid, plus amoxycillin 500 mg tid, each for 10 d); (2) killing Hp quadruple therapy(group B: the three above drugs plus killing H pylori capsule 6 capsules bid for 4 wk) and (3) placebo(group C: gastropine 3 tablets bid for 4 wk). H pylori eradication and ulcer healing quality were evaluated under an endoscope 4 wk after treatment. The patients were followed up for 5 years. RESULTS: Both the healing rate of PU and H pylori eradication rate in group B were significantly higher than those in group C (100% and 96.4% vs20% and 0%, respectively,P<0.005), but there was no significant difference compared to those in group A (88% and 92%, P>0.05). The healing quality of ulcer in group B was superior to that in groups C and A (P<0.05). The recurrence rate of PU in group B (4%) was lower than that in group A (10%) and group C (100%,P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Killing Helicobacter pylori quadruple therapy can not only promote the eradication of H pylori and healing quality of ulcer but also reduce recurrence rate of ulcer.     

含四环素三联方案根除幽门螺杆菌感染疗效观察

背景：随着幽门螺杆菌（Hp）耐药率的上升,标准三联疗法的Hp根除率明显降低。目的：评价含四环素三联方案根除Hp感染的疗效和安全性。方法：136例2012年11月～2013年4月于冠县人民医院诊断为慢性活动性胃炎或消化性溃疡、胃黏膜组织快速尿素酶试验（RUT）阳性患者纳入研究。将患者随机分为试验组和对照组,分别每日VI服奥美拉唑20mgbid＋阿莫西林1000mgbid十四环素750mgbid和奥美拉唑20mgbid＋阿莫西林1000mgbid＋克拉霉素500mgbid,疗程10d。记录治疗期间不良反应发生情况,疗程结束后4～6周复查胃黏膜组织RUT和”C一尿素呼气试验,两者均阴性判定为Hp根除成功。结果：134例患者按方案完成治疗并接受复查。按ITT分析,试验组和对照组Hp根除率分别为90．0％（63／70）和74．2％（49／66）;按PP分析,两组根除率分别为91．3％（63／69）和75．4％（49／65）。试验组Ir兀1和PP根除率均明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。试验组消化性溃疡愈合率亦显著高于对照组（90．9％对70．0％,P〈0．05）。两组间不良反应发生率无明显差异（12．9％对10．6％,P〉0．05）。结论：含四环素三联方案可有效根除Hp感染,促进消化性溃疡愈合,安全性高,依从性好,价格低廉,适合在基层医疗单位推广应用。     

奥美拉唑或兰索拉唑、阿莫西林、呋喃唑酮短程三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌

目的探索根除率较高、价廉、安全实用的HP根除方案.方法137例消化性溃疡或糜烂性胃窦炎患者,随机分为3组A组44例,以奥美拉唑20mg+克拉霉素250mg+替硝唑500mg每天2次,疗程7天,即Bazzoli方案;B组47例,以奥美拉唑20mg+阿莫西林1000mg+呋喃唑酮100mg,每天2次,疗程7天;C组46例,以兰索拉唑30mg每天1次,阿莫西林1000mg+呋喃唑酮100mg每天2次,疗程7天.活动期溃疡患者抗HP治疗后继服奥美拉唑20mg或兰索拉唑30mg,每天1次,3周.抗HP治疗结束1月后复查胃镜并检测HP.结果A、B、C3组的HP根除率分别为90.9%、87.2%和89.1%;活动期溃疡愈合率分别为100%、93.8%和100%;糜烂性胃窦炎愈合率分别为85.2%、79.2%和92.2%;副反应发生率分别为13.6%、6.4%和8.7%.各组间差异无显著性,P＞0.05.A、B、C3组每例抗HP所需费用分别为544.5元、309.0元和170.5元.结论方案B、C是2种新的、根除率较高、价廉、安全实用的HP根除方案.     

Role of Helicobacter pylori in ulcer healing and recurrence of gastric and duodenal ulcers in longterm NSAID users. Response to omeprazole dual therapy.

BACKGROUND: The relation between Helicobacter pylori infection and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-associated peptic ulcers remains unclear; in particular, it is not known whether H pylori plays a part in the healing and recurrence of these ulcers. AIMS: To evaluate prospectively in a consecutive series of arthritis patients receiving longterm NSAID treatment the prevalence of peptic ulcer as well as the effect of H pylori eradication on the healing and recurrence of gastric and duodenal ulcer found. PATIENTS: Some 278 consecutive patients underwent gastroscopy with multiple biopsies of the gastric antrum and corpus for histological examination and rapid urease test. One hundred peptic ulcers (59 gastric ulcers, 39 duodenal ulcers, and two gastric ulcers concomitant with a duodenal ulcer) were found. Seventy per cent of these ulcers were H pylori positive. METHODS: According to their H pylori status, ulcer patients were randomised to one of the following treatments: H pylori negative ulcers received omeprazole 20 mg twice daily for four to eight weeks, whereas H pylori positive lesions were treated with omeprazole 20 mg twice daily plus amoxycillin 1 g twice daily (the second of these for the first two weeks) or omeprazole alone for four to eight weeks while continuing NSAID therapy. Patients with healed ulcers were endoscopically followed up for six months after stopping antiulcer therapy while continuing NSAIDs. RESULTS: Endoscopic healing rates for gastric and duodenal ulcers in the three different groups were similar both at four and eight weeks. H pylori eradication did not influence healing, which occurred in 14 of 20 (70%) of patients in whom H pylori was eradicated, compared with 14 of 17 (82%) of patients with persistent infection. Cumulative recurrence rates at six months did not statistically differ among the three different groups (27% in H pylori negative, 46% in H pylori positive, and 31% in those where H pylori was eradicated during the healing phase), although a numerical trend in favour of a higher recurrence rate in infected patients was evident. CONCLUSIONS: H pylori eradication does not confer any significant advantage on the healing of gastric and duodenal ulcers associated with longterm NSAID use. It remains to be established with certainty whether eradication may be helpful in the reduction of recurrence in a specific subset of NSAID associated ulcer.     

雷贝拉唑与奥美拉唑三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌多中心、随机、双盲、平行对照研究

背景:新一代质子泵抑制剂雷贝拉唑具有较高的解离常数（pKa）,在抑酸方面起效更快,作用更持久稳定。目的:通过与奥美拉唑三联疗法比较,观察雷贝拉唑三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌（H.pylori）和治疗十二指肠溃疡的疗效。方法:采用多中心、随机、双盲、平行对照研究方法,于2002年1～7月在5家医院进行。109例经胃镜检查确诊为十二指肠溃疡活动期并经快速尿素酶试验和病理学检查确定为H.pylori阳性的患者分为两组:雷贝拉唑（商品名:波利特）试验组（RAC组,53例）和奥美拉唑（商品名:洛赛克）对照组（OAC组,56例）。两组均先给予三联治疗:雷贝拉唑10mg或奥美拉唑20mg+阿莫西林1g+克拉霉素500mg,每日2次,连续7天,然后单独给予雷贝拉唑10mg,每日1次或奥美拉唑20g,每日1次,连续7天,并于用药结束后第28天复查胃镜并检测H.pylori。于用药后第1、2、3、6和42天对患者的上腹痛、反酸以及上腹烧灼感等症状进行评估。结果:101例患者完成全部治疗方案,8例失访。H.pylori根除率:病理学检查结果显示RAC组的H.pylori根除率为86.0％,OAC组为76.5％,两组间差异无显著性（P>0.05）。溃疡愈合率:PAC组的溃疡愈合率为92.0％,OAC组为76.5％,OAC组高于OAC组,两组间差异有显著性（P<0.05）。症状改善情况:两组从用药第1天起均能有效改善     

10d序贯疗法对根除幽门螺杆菌疗效的随访研究

背景:幽门螺杆菌(H.pylori)与慢性胃炎、消化性溃疡、胃癌和胃黏膜相关淋巴组织(MALT)淋巴瘤密切相关,但标准三联疗法的根除率逐年下降。目的:比较10 d序贯疗法和三联疗法根除H.pylori的疗效。方法:将经快速尿素酶试验(RUT)和~(14)C-尿素呼气试验(UBT)证实为H.pylori阳性的106例消化性溃疡、慢性糜烂性胃炎和萎缩性胃炎患者随机分为以雷贝拉唑为基础的10 d序贯疗法组(n=56)和三联疗法组(n=50)。治疗结束4周后复查RUT和,~(14)C-UBT,评估H.pylori根除情况;随访1年后再复查~(14)C-UBT评估H.pylori复发情况。结果:共93例患者按方案完成治疗。10 d序贯疗法组H.pylori根除率按意向治疗(ITT)和按方案(PP)分析均显著高于三联疗法组(ITF:89.3%对62.0%,P0.01;PP:94.3%对77.5%,P0.05);10 d序贯疗法组不良反应发生率(7.1%对30.0%,P0.01)和随访1年后的H.pylori复发率(6.0%对25.8%,P0.01)均显著低于三联疗法组。结论:以雷贝拉唑为基础的10 d序贯疗法可明显提高H.pylori根除率,提高患者的依从性,减少不良反应的发生。     

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of different formulations of omeprazole-based triple therapies in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-positive peptic ulcer

Little is known about the efficacy and safety of different formulations of omeprazole-based triple therapy regimens for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-positive peptic ulcer. We compared the efficacy and safety of two formulations of omeprazole used in triple therapies in patients with H. pylori-positive active peptic ulcer. Seventy-four patients with endoscopically proven H. pylori-positive active peptic ulcer were randomized to two groups, each with 37 patients, to receive either OAC-I (6 weeks of "A" formulation of omeprazole [20 mg twice daily] plus 2 weeks of amoxicillin [1.0 g twice daily] and clarithromycin [500 mg twice daily] or OAC-II (6 weeks of "B" formulation of omeprazole [20 mg twice daily] plus 2 weeks of the same antibiotics. The H. pylori and ulcer healing status were assessed at the baseline and at the 6-week endpoint of therapy. Gastrointestinal symptoms, documentation of adverse events, and standard laboratory examinations were assessed at each visit. Eradication of H. pylori (intention to treat [n = 74]/per protocol [n = 66]) and healing of the ulcer were successful in 83.8%/96.9% and 93.8%, respectively, of the OAC-I group patients, and in 91.9%/100% and 97.1%, respectively, of the OAC-II group patients (P = 0.477; P = 0.608). The OAC-I group experienced rapid resolution of symptoms, but no significant differences were found between the two groups for number of days taken for resolution of gastrointestinal symptoms, adverse events, and laboratory findings. The two different formulations of omepra-zole used in triple therapy regimens produced similar efficacy and safety results after 6 weeks of treatment in patients with H. pylori-positive active peptic ulcer. Received: March 22, 2000 / Accepted: September 21, 2000     

Effect of omeprazole and amoxicillin plus metronidazole on the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and the healing of duodenal ulcer: comparison with a historical control.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To test the hypothesis of equivalence of an omeprazole 7-day triple therapy without subsequent acid suppression and a historical ranitidine 12-day triple therapy (recruiting phase 1989-91) with subsequent acid suppression in their effect on the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and the healing of duodenal ulcer. METHODOLOGY: Seventy-seven patients with H. pylori-positive duodenal ulcers received a 7-day treatment with amoxicillin 750 mg tid and metronidazole 500 mg tid. Additional omeprazole 20 mg or 40 mg once daily was given to 39 and 38 of the patients, respectively. Endoscopy was performed before treatment and four weeks after cessation of therapy. RESULTS: The cumulative intention-to-treat (ITT) H. pylori-eradication rate was 66% (51/77) as compared to 89% (46/52) for the historical control (p < 0.05). The corresponding ulcer healing rates were 90% (69/77) and 92% (48/52). Primary metronidazole resistance (PMR) had escalated from 10% to 27% within 6 years resulting in eradication rates of 84% for sensitive and 19% for resistant strains (p < 0.001). PMR could be demonstrated in 45% of all female, but only in 17% of the male patients (p < 0.05). In the patients with H. pylori eradication, the ulcers healed in 98% (50/51) as compared to 73% (19/26) in those with persistent infection (p < 0.005). Analysis based on the presence of PMR showed ulcer healing rates of 95% (53/56) for sensitive and 76% (16/21) for resistant strains (p < 0.05). Improvement of pain also showed a significant correlation with successful eradication. H. pylori-eradication, healing and symptom relief were similar in the omeprazole 20 mg and 40 mg groups. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of amoxicillin plus metronidazole plus antisecretory agent on the eradication of H. pylori has decreased markedly during the past 6 years due to the escalation of PMR. Doubling of the omeprazole dose does not affect outcome. Cure of the infection as well as metronidazole susceptibility enhance duodenal ulcer healing and symptom relief. Acid suppression following a successful 1-week anti-HP therapy is not required for duodenal ulcer treatment.