Audiological performance after cochlear implantation: a 2-year follow-up in children with inner ear malformations

CONCLUSIONS: Open-set speech perception in children with an inner ear malformation is equal to that of other congenitally deaf children after an average of 2 years follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To analyze audiological performance after cochlear implantation in a sample of children with radiographically detectable malformations of the inner ear compared to performance in prelingually deafened children at large. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine children with osseous inner ear malformations were compared to 22 congenitally deaf children, all of whom underwent cochlear implantation. All subjects were tested on their electrical evoked compound action potential. Speech perception tests were performed using the monosyllabic trochee polysyllabic test without visual support and the open-set monosyllabic wordlist. RESULTS: In all, 20% of the congenitally deaf children in our center study have inner ear abnormalities. Inner ear malformations were limited to incomplete partition of the cochlea; none of the subjects had common cavity malformations. Electrical compound action potentials were successfully recorded in both groups intraoperatively. Speech perception tests on open-set speech yielded an average of 48.8% (SD 21.2%) in the group of children with inner ear malformations vs 54.5% (SD 21.1%) in congenitally deaf children. In four of nine cases with an inner ear malformation we encountered a minor CSF leak.     

Speech perception and speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term speech perception and speech intelligibility of congenitally and prelingually deaf children after cochlear implantation. It was a longitudinal study following 63 congenitally or prelingually deaf children up to 5 years after implantation. They each received a nucleus multichannel cochlear implant before they were 10 years old. METHODS: Perception is evaluated using the Test for the Evaluation of Voice Perception and Production (TEPP) and concerns closed- and open-set word and sentence perception without lip-reading. The intelligibility is classified according to the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR). The evaluations have been made every 3 months for 1 year, then at 18 months, 2 years, 3 years and 5 years after the cochlear implantation. RESULTS: After 5 years of implantation, the median percentage of closed-words speech perception (CSW) is 95.5%-93.67% for closed-sentence speech perception (CSS) and 76.3% for open-sentence speech perception (OSS); the median Speech Intelligibility Rating is 3.83. CONCLUSIONS: Congenitally and prelingually deaf children who receive cochlear implant before the age of 10 years develop speech perception and speech intelligibility abilities. The closed-set perception progresses quickly and seems to reaching a plateau at 5 years post implantation. The improvement of open-sentence perception is not significant until the first year post implantation. The speech intelligibility improves regularly the five first year post implantation.     

Speech Perception Performance in Prelingually Deaf Children with Cochlear Implants

The goals of this study were to report on mean values of speech perception performance in prelingually deaf children implanted with a Combi 40/40+ cochlear implant. A total of 31 patients were included in the study. The time span ranged over 3 years, during which time the Evaluation of Auditory Responses to Speech (EARS) test battery was used with the children. The EARS battery contains four measures of closed-set speech perception and three open-set tests. The mean test results exhibited steady improvement on all parts of the EARS test battery, even up to 3 years post-implantation. The preoperative scores for the Listening Progress Profile (LiP) were 4%, rising to 93% at 36 months post-implantation. Results for the open-set testing measures were most encouraging, with some children reaching fairly high levels of speech perception, receiving scores as high as 100% by the 36-month evaluation. The congenitally and prelingually deaf children in our study showed continuous improvement in both closed and open set speech perception following cochlear implantation, although variability in individual performance among the children was noted.     

Speech perception performance in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants

The goals of this study were to report on mean values of speech perception performance in prelingually deaf children implanted with a Combi 40/40 + cochlear implant. A total of 31 patients were included in the study. The time span ranged over 3 years, during which time the Evaluation of Auditory Responses to Speech (EARS) test battery was used with the children. The EARS battery contains four measures of closed-set speech perception and three open-set tests. The mean test results exhibited steady improvement on all parts of the EARS test battery, even up to 3 years post-implantation. The preoperative scores for the Listening Progress Profile (LiP) were 4%, rising to 93% at 36 months post-implantation. Results for the open-set testing measures were most encouraging, with some children reaching fairly high levels of speech perception, receiving scores as high as 100%, by the 36-month evaluation. The congenitally and prelingually deaf children in our study showed continuous improvement in both closed and open set speech perception following cochlear implantation, although variability in individual performance among the children was noted.     

Cochlear implantation in children with congenital inner ear malformations

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To assess the audiologic and surgical outcomes for pediatric cochlear implant patients with inner ear malformations. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of 315 pediatric cochlear implant cases from 1994 to 2002. METHODS: Twenty-eight pediatric cochlear implant patients with known inner ear malformations determined on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the temporal bone were the subjects of review. Results of HRCT findings, intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, and objective measures of both closed- and open-set testing of speech perception were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients with the constellation of an incompletely partitioned (IP) cochlea, enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA), and a dilated vestibule (i.e., Mondini's malformation) as well as those with an isolated EVA or partial semicircular canal aplasia have relatively good levels of speech perception. Patients with total semicircular canal aplasia, isolated IP, cochlear hypoplasia, or common cavity demonstrated lower levels of performance. Poor performance may be related to associated developmental delays rather than labyrinthine anatomy alone. Complications of surgery were relatively limited. CONCLUSIONS: Cochlear implantation can be successfully performed in children with inner ear malformations. These children and their parents can expect significant auditory benefits from this intervention. The various types of inner ear malformations may have quite different prognoses for good auditory performance.     

Development of auditory skills after cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformations

Conclusions: CI improves hearing thresholds and auditory skills in children with most types of inner ear malformations. However, the development of sound detection skills is not as good as it is in children without inner ear malformations. Objectives: To investigate the influence of inner ear malformations on development of auditory skills after cochlear implantation (CI). Methods: Records of 20 children with inner ear malformations who underwent cochlear implantation before 4 years of age and followed up for more than 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Hearing thresholds, the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS), and Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (MUSS) scores before and after CI were analyzed and compared with 20 age-matched deaf children who underwent CI. Results: The children with inner ear malformations showed significant improvements in hearing thresholds and the MAIS and MUSS scores 1 year after CI (p?p?p?相似文献   

Connexin-associated deafness and speech perception outcome of cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVE: To compare performance after cochlear implantation in children with mutations in connexin (Cx) 26 (GJB2) or Cx30 (GJB6) and children with deafness of unknown etiology. DESIGN: Genetic analysis and speech perception evaluation was performed in the children with and without Cx mutations who had undergone cochlear implantation. Speech perception performance was retrospectively analyzed 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after implantation. Test material was selected according to the child's age and cognitive and language abilities. SETTING: The study took place at speech and hearing and genetic centers of a hospital in the central part of Israel and the genetics departments of 3 additional centrally located hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 30 children who had undergone cochlear implantation were selected for the study, with control patients matched according to age at implantation, duration of implant use, and mode of communication. There was no evidence for additional disabilities or handicaps in either group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception measurements included a questionnaire, as well as closed and open-set tests. RESULTS: Overall, the 2 groups showed significant improvement in speech perception results after implantation. Four years after implantation, both groups achieved mean open-set speech perception scores of approximately 60%, 75%, and 90% for monosyllabic, 2 syllables, and words in sentences tests, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There were no apparent differences in speech perception performance after implantation between the children with Cx mutations and children with deafness of unknown etiology. These data have important implications as a prognostic indicator when counseling candidates for cochlear implantation.     

Cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformations: report of two cases

Cochlear implantation of congenitally deaf children with inner ear malformations is gaining special interest. Although the number of the reported cases is increasing, the decision for implantation needs thorough investigation. Preoperative evaluation, surgical approach and postoperative follow-up can be challenging. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of two cases with inner ear malformations. PATIENTS: One patient was a 3-year-old-girl who had cochlear and cochleovestibular nerve aplasia on the left side and incomplete partition on the other side. The other patient was a 5-year-old-boy who had hypoplastic cochlea on both sides. Both of them also had vestibular anomalies. Cases were implanted by using multichannel cochlear implant. RESULTS: No complications were encountered. Both patients responded to acoustic stimuli, and their speech perception skills were improved. After 10 months of cochlear implant use, their results seem encouraging. CONCLUSION: Except cochlear or cochleovestibular nerve agenesis, inner ear malformations cannot be accepted as a contraindication for cochlear implantation. Although there can be difficulties during the surgery or in the postoperative period, patients with inner ear malformations can also benefit from cochlear implantation. It is essential that all possible complications and postoperative performance should be discussed with the parents.     

Effect of age at cochlear implantation on open-set word recognition in Mandarin speaking deaf children

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether age at cochlear implantation influences open-set speech perception in children after long-term use of the implant device. METHOD: Twenty-eight congenitally deafened children, receiving implants of Nucleus CI24M devices, were divided into two groups: (1) CI < 3: those who received implants before 3 years of age and (2) CI > 3: those who received implants after 3 years of age. We compared open-set speech perception in CI < 3 and CI > 3 after 4-5 years of device use. Speech perception tests were conducted using the Mandarin Lexical Neighborhood Test (M-LNT). Unpaired t-test was applied for statistical analysis, and p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In CI < 3, the average of percent correct was 80.0 +/- 8.8 and 70.5 +/- 9.2% on, respectively, the easy and hard versions of the M-LNT. By contrast, in CI > 3, the average percent correct was 62.5 +/- 19.9 and 59.1 +/- 15.2%, respectively. Regardless of the M-LNT version used, CI < 3 performed significantly better than CI > 3 (easy, p = 0.005 versus hard, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: The present investigation demonstrated that age at implantation influences open-set speech perception of cochlear implanted children 4-5 years after device connection. Implantation before 3 years of age promotes the development of open-set speech perception abilities in congenitally deafened children.     

Congenital malformation of the inner ear and pediatric cochlear implantation.

OBJECTIVES: To study the surgical aspects and performance outcome of cochlear implantation in children with malformed inner ears. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical and audiometric evaluation in 13 patients. METHODS: Patient data concerning surgery, postoperative follow-up, and pre- and postimplantation audiometry were obtained from the cochlear implant center's database and evaluated. A review of the literature has been included. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: The patients had a variety of inner ear malformations and profound hearing loss. One patient with recurrent meningitis had a severe cochlear malformation (common cavity). RESULTS: Major complications did not occur. In one patient with an abnormal position of the cochlea and concurring middle ear disease, it was difficult to find the scala tympani during surgery. A cerebrospinal fluid gusher was encountered in two patients and an aberrant facial nerve in another, which did not lead to any complications. The patients with mild cochlear malformation such as an incomplete partition demonstrated a good performance in speech perception tests. Even the child with the common cavity deformity had some open-set speech perception 1 year after implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Viewing the patients from this study and patients from a review of the literature concerning cochlear implantation in children with malformed inner ears including severe cochlear malformations, the occurrence of an aberrant facial nerve was 17%, which increases to 27% if one reviews the surgical findings in children with severe malformed cochleae such as a common cavity or a severe cochlear hypoplasia. In the latter patients, results in speech perception vary. Although the result of cochlear implantation may be promising, as in our patient with a common cavity, during preoperative counseling the child's parents must be informed that the result is uncertain.     

Cochlear implantation in 21 patients with common cavity malformation

Conclusion: The facial recess approach is preferred in common cavity (CC) malformation with an incomplete basal turn, and the transmastoid single-slit labyrinthotomy approach in classic CC malformation. Patients with CC benefit from cochlear implantation (CI) over time, but the audiological and speech development is poorer than in cases with normal cochleas. Objectives: To discuss the surgical aspects and performance of CI in 21 patients with CC malformation. Methods: Twenty-one CC malformations were classified into 2 types: classic CC malformation and CC malformation with an incomplete basal turn. Twenty-one patients without inner ear malformation were set as the control group. Thus, data for 42 patients were analyzed. Results: The facial recess approach was used in 3 patients with CC malformation with an incomplete basal turn, and the transmastoid single-slit labyrinthotomy approach in 18 patients with classic CC malformation. After follow-up for 36 months, the average free-field hearing threshold was higher, and the scores for the CAP, SIR, IT-MAIS, and closed-set/open-set auditory speech perception tests were lower than in the control group (p < 0.05).     

Cochlear implants in young children: the relationship between speech perception and speech intelligibility.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between measures of speech perception and speech production after cochlear implantation of young children with profound congenital and prelingual deafness. DESIGN: A prospective study was undertaken on a consecutive group of children with profound deafness. There were 126 children at the preimplantation interval and 71, 50, 26, and 20 children, respectively, at the 2, 3, 4, and 5 yr follow-up after implantation. Speech perception and speech intelligibility were assessed using hierarchical rating scales. Spearman rank correlation coefficients were used to determine the statistical correlations. All patients were either congenitally deaf or deafened before the age of 3 yr and were implanted before age 7 yr. The patients all received the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant system with the most appropriate speech encoding strategy. RESULTS: Speech intelligibility at 5 yr was strongly correlated with speech perception at the 2, 3, 4, and 5 yr intervals after implantation (Spearman coefficients 0.77, 0.81, 0.58, 0.58; p < or = 0.01). Speech intelligibility at the 2, 3, and 4 yr intervals also correlated in a similar manner with earlier speech perception abilities (p < or = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that speech intelligibility between 2 and 5 yr after implantation in young children with congenital and prelingual profound deafness can be predicted by measures of earlier speech perception.     

Speech perception of Mandarin Chinese speaking young children after cochlear implant use: effect of age at implantation

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to examine (1). whether the benefit of cochlear implants in Mandarin-speaking congenitally deaf children persists over a 2-year follow-up period, and (2). whether the age of the child at implantation affects the acquisition of speech perception by young deafened children. METHOD: Sixteen congenitally deaf children received implants of Nucleus CI24M devices. Speech perception tests were conducted using the Mandarin Auditory Perception Test Battery at 6-month intervals after connection of the device. We determined the benefit of cochlear implants by monitoring percent correct scores between 12 and 24 months after implantation. Regression analysis was used to correlate the measures of progress and the age at implantation. RESULTS: In the comparison of performance at 12 and 24 months post-connection, subjects performed significantly better at 24 than at 12 months in spondee, vowel, and consonant tests (P<0.05). In phrase and sentence tests, the mean score improved over time with device use, but the difference was not significant (P=0.066 and 0.067, respectively). However, no obvious improvement in average score was found in tone tests (P=0.386). Progress (improvement in speech perception) at 12 and 24 months had moderate negative correlations with age at implantation in spondee, vowel, phrase and sentence tests (P<0.05), but no correlation with age in consonant (P=0.20) and tone tests (P=0.26). CONCLUSION: The result, in accordance with the reports on Western language-speaking children, showed cochlear implants increasingly benefit Mandarin-speaking congenitally deaf children over a 2-year post-implantation period. Because age at implantation negatively correlates with improved speech perception after implantation, congenitally affected children with profound deafness (if they cannot obtain enough benefit from hearing aids) should receive implants as early as possible.     

Cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformations

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformations (IEMs). METHODS: A retrospective review of 212 children who received implants from September 1994 to May 2004 was performed. Forty-six of them had radiologic evidence of IEMs. The preoperative evaluations, intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, and performance outcomes were analyzed. For the comparative analysis of performance outcomes, the children with IEMs were matched and compared with children with a normal inner ear who had received implants. Statistical analysis was performed with a repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: All of the children were studied with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Three-dimensional volume rendering of magnetic resonance images was performed in cases that were difficult to interpret because of structural complexity. The operative findings included aberrant facial nerves in 2 children and cerebrospinal fluid gushers in 22 children. Intraoperative fluoroscopic examination was performed to evaluate electrode placement. There were no serious postoperative complications. All children with IEMs achieved open-set speech perception abilities, except for the children with a narrow internal auditory canal (IAC), and showed progressive improvement of their speech perception abilities over time. There were no statistically significant differences in performance measured by the Common Phrases test between the 2 groups. Although the repeated-measures analysis of variance indicated that children with IEMs performed more poorly than those with a normal inner ear on the Phonetically Balanced Kindergarten test for phonemes, statistical significance was not found at 2 years after implantation. The children with a narrow IAC benefited from the implantation and used the device every day, although their speech perception abilities were limited. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study show that cochlear implantation can be performed relatively safely in deaf children with IEMs and that they receive considerable benefit from their implants. Substantial benefit can be expected from implantation in children with most kinds of IEMs, except for a narrow IAC, which is often associated with limited results.     

Early results using the nucleus CI24M in children

OBJECTIVE: To report early postimplantation speech recognition results in children who received Nucleus CI24M cochlear implants. STUDY DESIGN: The study group consisted of 19 consecutively implanted children. PATIENTS AND SETTING: Congenitally deaf children (20 months to 15 years old) were implanted with the Nucleus CI24M and followed-up at New York University Medical Center for a period of 3 to 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception was evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using the Early Speech Perception (ESP) test, the Glendonald Auditory Screening Procedure (GASP) word and sentence tests, Phonetically Balanced Kindergarten (PBK) monosyllabic word lists, Common Phrases test, the Multisyllabic and Lexical Neighborhood (MLNT, LNT) tests, and the Banford-Kowal-Bench (BKB) sentence test. RESULTS: One-way analyses of variance revealed significant improvement in open-set speech recognition in children able to perform measurement tasks. CONCLUSIONS: The Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant provides significant benefit to children after short-term use.     

内耳畸形语前聋患儿人工耳蜗术后康复效果分析

目的　评估内耳畸形语前聋患儿人工耳蜗植入术后康复结果。方法　回顾性分析术前影像学检查为内耳畸形语前聋人工耳蜗21例,并筛选背景接近的21例正常耳蜗结构语前聋人工耳蜗植入患儿配对组合。对患者术前、术后6个月及术后1年3个阶段听力言语康复效果进行评估。结果　9例前庭导水管扩大综合征和6例Mondini 畸形患者与耳蜗结构正常者相比,听觉言语结果无明显差异。畸形比较严重的1例Mondini和5例共同腔患者与耳蜗正常者相比,听觉言语结果有明显的差异。结论　前庭导水管扩大综合征患者人工耳蜗术后效果与耳蜗发育正常者相似,但对严重的Mondini 畸形和共同腔等内耳畸形者行人工耳蜗植入时术前应准确评估畸形的程度及伴发的畸形,以助于术后制定康复方案。     

Cochlear implants for children with significant residual hearing

BACKGROUND: Previous research suggests that children with pure-tone averages of greater than 90 dB hearing level and/or open-set sentence perception of less than 30% may derive significant benefit from cochlear implantation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate postoperative speech perception benefit and bilateral-bimodal benefit for 16 children whose preimplant speech perception scores exceeded conservative candidacy guidelines. STUDY DESIGN: Preimplant and postimplant repeated-measure design. METHODS: Sixteen child subjects who obtained 30% or greater on preimplant open-set sentence material, presented live voice audition alone, were selected for this study. Preimplant pure-tone averages ranged from 73 to 110 dB in the better aided ear. Preimplant and postimplant open-set word and sentence testing was completed in quiet and with competing background noise for separate ear and binaural conditions. RESULTS: Fourteen of 16 subjects had improved speech perception scores across all test materials after implantation. Group means were significantly higher for all test materials. Results in the bimodal-bilateral condition were significantly higher than implant alone for open-set word tests (scored for phonemes) and open-set sentences in quiet. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that, with appropriate counseling and management, some children with significant residual hearing benefit from cochlear implantation, in particular improved speech understanding due to bimodal-bilateral hearing.     

Impact of auditory cortical asymmetry in cochlear implantation

Abstract

Objective

Is there a cochlear implant ear advantage for speech perception?

Patients

A total number of 68 cochlear implant recipients were evaluated retrospectively. They were 20 adults implanted in right ear, 20 matched adults implanted in left ear while 14 children implanted in right ear and 14 matched children implanted in left ear.

Methods

Behavioral responses & age based speech perception tests were evaluated at 6 months and 1 year post implantation.

Results

Adult showed no statistical difference in all tests at 6 months evaluation while 1 year evaluation showed significant better performance for right implanted group in monosyllabic discrimination test. Children showed statistical significant performance in monosyllabic identification and minimal pairs testes at 6 months evaluation; and in monosyllabic identification only at 1 year evaluation.

Conclusion

The present data support that right ear implantation would fasten the development of auditory skills especially in young children, an issue to be considered in unilateral implantation.     

Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical trials in which children received bilateral cochlear implants in sequential operations were conducted to analyze the extent to which bilateral implantation offers benefits on a number of measures. The present investigation was particularly focused on measuring the effects of age at implantation and experience after activation of the second implant on speech perception performance. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty children aged 3 to 13 years were recipients of 2 cochlear implants, received in sequential operations, a minimum of 6 months apart. All children received their first implant before 5 years of age and had acquired speech perception capabilities with the first device. They were divided into 3 age groups on the basis of age at time of second ear implantation: Group I, 3 to 5 years; Group II, 5.1 to 8 years; and Group III, 8.1 to 13 years. Speech perception measures in quiet included the Multisyllabic Lexical Neighborhood Test (MLNT) for Group I, the Lexical Neighborhood Test (LNT) for Groups II and III, and the Hearing In Noise Test for Children (HINT-C) sentences in quiet for Group III. Speech perception in noise was assessed using the Children's Realistic Intelligibility and Speech Perception (CRISP) test. Testing was performed preoperatively and again postactivation of the second implant at 3, 6, and 12 months (CRISP at 3 and 9 mo) in both the unilateral and bilateral conditions in a repeated-measures study design. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to analyze statistical significance among device configurations and performance over time. SETTING: US Multicenter. RESULTS: Results for speech perception in quiet show that children implanted sequentially acquire open-set speech perception in the second ear relatively quickly (within 6 mo). However, children younger than 8 years do so more rapidly and to a higher level of speech perception ability at 12 months than older children (mean second ear MLNT/LNT scores at 12 months: Group I, 83.9%; range, 71-96%; Group II, 59.5%; range, 40-88%; Group III, 32%; range, 12-56%). The second-ear mean HINT-C score for Group III children remained far less than that of the first ear even after 12 months of device use (44 versus 89%; t, 6.48; p<0.001; critical value, 0.025). Speech intelligibility for spondees in noise was significantly better under bilateral conditions than with either ear alone when all children were analyzed as a single group and for Group III children. At the 9-month test interval, performance in the bilateral configuration was significantly better for all noise conditions (13.2% better for noise at first cochlear implant, 6.8% better for the noise front and noise at second cochlear implant conditions, t=2.32, p=0.024, critical level=0.05 for noise front; t=3.75, p<0.0001, critical level=0.05 for noise at first implant; t=2.73, p = 0.008, critical level=0.05 for noise at second implant side). The bilateral benefit in noise increased with time from 3 to 9 months after activation of the second implant. This bilateral advantage is greatest when noise is directed toward the first implanted ear, indicating that the head shadow effect is the most effective binaural mechanism. The bilateral condition produced small improvements in speech perception in quiet and for individual Group I and Group II patient results in noise that, in view of the relatively small number of subjects tested, do not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children of diverse ages has the potential to improve speech perception abilities in the second implanted ear and to provide access to the use of binaural mechanisms such as the head shadow effect. The improvement unfolds over time and continues to grow during the 6 to 12 months after activation of the second implant. Younger children in this study achieved higher open-set speech perception scores in the second ear, but older children still demonstrate bilateral benefit in noise. Determining the long-term impact and cost-effectiveness that results from such potential capabilities in bilaterally implanted children requires additional study with larger groups of subjects and more prolonged monitoring.     

Outcomes for cochlear implant users with significant residual hearing: implications for selection criteria in children

OBJECTIVES: To develop an evidence-based technique for providing recommendations to candidates for cochlear implantation with significant residual hearing and to assess the efficacy of the approach. DESIGN: Modified selection criteria were derived from an analysis of the postoperative performance for a large group of adult cochlear implant users. In particular, the distributions of results for implant users with significant preoperative open-set speech perception were reviewed. This suggested that the candidates had a good chance (>75%) of overall improvement if they obtained open-set sentence scores in quiet of up to 70% in the best-aided condition and scores of up to 40% in the ear to undergo implantation. PATIENTS: A group of 45 adult implantation candidates who fit the modified criteria and who underwent preimplantation and postimplantation assessment to compare actual results with those predicted from the distributions. RESULTS: The speech perception results showed that 36 subjects (80%) had improved open-set sentence scores with the cochlear implant compared with their best-aided preoperative performance (mean improvement, 20.5%). Forty-four (98%) had improved open-set sentence scores for the ear undergoing implantation (mean improvement, 65.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The general concept of using the distribution of speech perception results to make evidence-based recommendations for candidates for cochlear implants is supported by this study. The approach can be used across different subpopulations, including older children with significant residual auditory skills, and for different outcome measures. It is important that the data used to provide recommendations and modify selection criteria are from an unselected sample of implant users of adequate size. This study highlights the continuing need to evaluate speech perception performance carefully before and after cochlear implantation.