Difference in absolute risk of venous and arterial thrombosis between familial protein S deficiency type I and type III. Results from a family cohort study to assess the clinical impact of a laboratory test-based classification

Hereditary protein S (PS) deficiency type I is an established risk factor for venous thromboembolism. Contradictionary data on type III deficiency suggests a difference in risk between both types. We studied 156 first degree relatives (90% of eligible relatives) from type I deficient probands (cohort 1) and 268 (88%) from type III deficient probands (cohort 2) to determine the absolute risk of venous and arterial thromboembolism. Annual incidences of venous thromboembolism were 1.47 and 0.17 per 100 person-years in deficient and non-deficient relatives in cohort 1 [relative risk (RR) 8.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6-30.0], and 0.27 vs. 0.24 in cohort 2 (RR 0.9; 95% CI 0.4-2.2). Type III deficiency was demonstrated in 20% of non-deficient relatives in cohort 1 and the annual incidence in this subgroup was 0.70 (RR 4.3;0.95-19.0). The cut-off level of free PS to identify subjects at risk was 30%, the lower limit of its normal range (65%). PS deficiency was not a risk factor for arterial thromboembolism. In conclusion, type I deficiency was found to be a strong risk factor for venous thromboembolism, in contrast with type III deficiency. This was because of lower free PS levels in type I deficient subjects and a free PS cut-off level far below the lower limit of its normal range.     

Risk of venous thromboembolism in carriers of factor V Leiden with a concomitant inherited thrombophilic defect: a retrospective analysis.

Factor V Leiden is the most common genetic defect associated with venous thromboembolism. Its clinical expression is limited and shows a wide intrafamilial and interfamilial variation, which might be explained by the influence of other genetic risk factors. We retrospectively studied 226 patients with factor V Leiden and documented venous thromboembolism (probands) and 400 first-degree carrier relatives to assess the contribution of concomitant genetic risk factors to the occurrence of venous thromboembolism. The prothrombin G20210A mutation was found in 8.3%, homozygosity of factor V Leiden in 7.2%, and inherited deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C or protein S in 4.7% of symptomatic carriers (probands and relatives), as compared with 6.0, 3.4 and 0.9% of asymptomatic carriers, respectively. The total follow-up time in relatives was 11 049 years. Prevalences of venous thromboembolism were 10.8% in single heterozygous factor V Leiden carrier relatives, 16.0% in double-heterozygotes for factor V Leiden and the prothrombin mutation, 36.8% in homozygotes for factor V Leiden, and 40.0% in double-heterozygotes for factor V Leiden and an inherited deficiency of protein C or protein S. Annual incidences in these groups were 0.39, 0.57, 1.41, and 4.76%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed a small, non-significant additional effect of the prothrombin mutation on the risk of venous thromboembolism in heterozygotes for factor V Leiden [adjusted hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.5-3.8]. This effect was more pronounced for homozygosity of factor V Leiden (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.7-9.0) and inherited protein C or protein S deficiencies (adjusted hazard ratio, 17.5; 95% CI, 3.8-81.2). Our data provide evidence of clustering of the evaluated genetic thrombophilic defects in symptomatic factor V Leiden carriers and support the assumption that the clinical expression of factor V Leiden depends on clustering in a part of carriers.     

Inherited thrombophilia in children with venous thromboembolism and the familial risk of thromboembolism: an observational study

Screening for inherited thrombophilia (IT) is controversial; persons at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) who benefit from screening need to be identified. We tested 533 first- and second-degree relatives of 206 pediatric VTE patients for IT (antithrombin, protein C, protein S, factor V G1691A, factor II G20210A) and determined the incidence of symptomatic VTE relative to their IT status. The risk for VTE was significantly increased among family members with, versus without, IT (hazard ratio = 7.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0-14.5; P < .001) and highest among carriers of antithrombin, protein C, or protein S deficiency (hazard ratio = 25.7; 95% CI, 12.2-54.2; P < .001). Annual incidences of VTE were 2.82% (95% CI, 1.63%-4.80%) among family members found to be carriers of antithrombin, protein C, or protein S deficiency, 0.42% (0.12%-0.53%) for factor II G202010A, 0.25% (0.12%-0.53%) for factor V G1691A, and 0.10% (0.06%-0.17%) in relatives with no IT. Given the high absolute risk of VTE in relatives with protein C, protein S, and antithrombin deficiency, we suggest screening for these forms of hereditary thrombophilia in children with VTE and their relatives. Interventional studies are required to assess whether thromboembolism can be prevented in this high-risk population.     

High risk of pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism in women with multiple thrombophilic defects

Pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism, which probably varies according to the presence of single or multiple thrombophilic defects. This retrospective family cohort study assessed the risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and puerperium, and the contribution of concomitant thrombophilic defects in families with hereditary antithrombin, protein C or protein S deficiencies. Probands were excluded. Of 222 female relatives, 101 were deficient and 121 non-deficient. Annual incidences of venous thromboembolism were 1.76% in deficient women versus 0.19% in non-deficient women [adjusted relative risk (RR) 11.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.9-36.2]. Other single and multiple thrombophilic defects increased the risk in deficient women from 1.55% to 2.14% and 2.92%, and in non-deficient women from 0.16% to 0.09% and 0.54% respectively. Deficient women were at lower risk (1.37%; 0.80-2.19) than deficient women that had never been pregnant (2.96%; 1.53-5.18); RR 0.5 (0.2-0.99). This difference was due to the predominance of events related to oral contraceptives in deficient women that had never been pregnant (75%), while 71% of events in deficient women that had had at least one pregnancy were pregnancy-related. In conclusion, women with hereditary deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C or protein S are at high risk of pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism. This risk is increased by multiple additional thrombophilic defects.     

Co-segregation of thrombophilic disorders in factor V Leiden carriers; the contributions of factor VIII,factor XI,thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor and lipoprotein(a) to the absolute risk of venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The clinical expression of factor V Leiden varies widely within and between families and only a minority of carriers will ever develop venous thromboembolism. Co-segregation of thrombophilic disorders is a possible explanation. Our aim was to assess the contributions of high levels of factor VIII:C, factor XI:C, thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) and lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) to the risk of venous thromboembolism in factor V Leiden carriers. DESIGN AND METHODS: Levels of the four proteins were measured, in addition to tests of deficiencies for antithrombin, protein C and protein S, and the prothrombin G20210A mutation, in 153 factor V Leiden carriers, derived from a family cohort study. The (adjusted) relative risk and absolute risk of venous thromboembolism for high levels of each protein were calculated. RESULTS: Of carriers, 60% had one or more concomitant thrombophilic disorders. Crude odds ratios (95% CI) of venous thromboembolism for high protein levels were: 3.2 (1.1-9.3) (factor VIII:C); 1.7 (0.6-4.9) (factor XI:C); 3.0 (1.1-8.2) (TAFI); and 1.9 (0.7-5.7) (Lp(a)). Adjusted for age, sex, other concomitant thrombophilic disorders and exogenous risk factors, the odds ratio for venous thromboembolism were 2.7 (0.8-8.7) for high factor VIII:C levels and 1.8 (0.6-5.3) for high TAFI levels. Annual incidences in subgroups of carriers were 0.35% (0.09-0.89), 0.44% (0.05-1.57) and 0.94% (0.35-2.05) for concomitance of high levels of factor VIII:C, TAFI and both, respectively, as compared to 0.09% (0.00-0.48) in single factor V Leiden carriers and 1.11% (0.30-2.82) for other concomitant disorders. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: High levels of factor VIII:C and TAFI, in contrast with factor XI:C and Lp(a), are mild risk factors for venous thromboembolism, and substantially contribute to the risk of venous thromboembolism in factor V Leiden carriers. Our data support the hypothesis that the clinical expression of factor V Leiden depends on co-segregation of thrombophilic disorders.     

Oral contraceptives and the absolute risk of venous thromboembolism in women with single or multiple thrombophilic defects: results from a retrospective family cohort study

BACKGROUND: The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in women taking combined oral contraceptives (COCs) is attributed to changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis. Their impact may be greater in women with preexistent thrombophilic defects. METHODS: We assessed the effects of COCs on absolute VTE risk in women with single or multiple thrombophilic defects in a retrospective family cohort study. Female relatives of probands with VTE and hereditary deficiencies of protein S, protein C, or antithrombin were tested for known thrombophilic defects, including the index deficiency. Absolute incidences of VTE were compared in deficient vs nondeficient women, in deficient and nondeficient women who ever or never used COCs, and in deficient and nondeficient women with 0, 1, or more than 1 other thrombophilic defect during exposure to COCs. RESULTS: Of 222 women, 135 (61%) ever used COCs. Overall, annual incidences of VTE were 1.64% and 0.18% in deficient and nondeficient women, respectively; the adjusted relative risk was 11.9 (95% confidence interval, 3.9-36.2). The risk was comparable in deficient ever and never users (1.73% vs 1.54%). Annual incidences during actual COC use were 4.62% in deficient women and 0.48% in nondeficient women; the relative risk was 9.7 (95% confidence interval, 3.0-42.4). The incidence increased by concomitant thrombophilic defects, from 3.49% to 12.00% in deficient women and from 0% to 3.13% in nondeficient women. CONCLUSIONS: Women with hereditary deficiencies of protein S, protein C, or antithrombin are at high risk of VTE during use of COCs, particularly when other thrombophilic defects are present. They have VTE at a younger age, but the overall risk is not increased by COCs.     

Clinical relevance of decreased free protein S levels: results from a retrospective family cohort study involving 1143 relatives

Conflicting data have been reported on the risk for venous thrombosis in subjects with low free protein S levels. We performed a post-hoc analysis in a single-center retrospective thrombophilic family cohort, to define the optimal free protein S level that can identify subjects at risk for venous thrombosis. Relatives (1143) were analyzed. Relatives with venous thrombosis (mean age 39 years) had lower free protein S levels than relatives without venous thrombosis (P < .001), which was most pronounced in the lowest quartile. Only relatives with free protein S levels less than the 5th percentile (< 41 IU/dL) or less than the 2.5th percentile (< 33 IU/dL) were at higher risk of first venous thrombosis compared with the upper quartile (> 91 IU/dL); annual incidence 1.20% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.87) and 1.81% (95% CI, 1.01-2.99), respectively; adjusted hazard ratios 5.6, (95% CI, 2.7-11.5) and 11.3 (95% CI, 5.4-23.6). Recurrence rates were 12.12% (95 CI, 5.23-23.88) and 12.73% (95% CI, 5.12-26.22) per year; adjusted hazard ratios were 3.0 (95% CI, 1.03-8.5) and 3.4 (95% CI, 1.1-10.3). In conclusion, free protein S level can identify young subjects at risk for venous thrombosis in thrombophilic families, although the cutoff level lies far below the normal range in healthy volunteers.     

Thrombotic risk during oral contraceptive use and pregnancy in women with factor V Leiden or prothrombin mutation: a rational approach to contraception

Current guidelines discourage combined oral contraceptive (COC) use in women with hereditary thrombophilic defects. However, qualifying all hereditary thrombophilic defects as similarly strong risk factors might be questioned. Recent studies indicate the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) of a factor V Leiden mutation as considerably lower than a deficiency of protein C, protein S, or antithrombin. In a retrospective family cohort, the VTE risk during COC use and pregnancy (including postpartum) was assessed in 798 female relatives with or without a heterozygous, double heterozygous, or homozygous factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A mutation. Overall, absolute VTE risk in women with no, single, or combined defects was 0.13 (95% confidence interval 0.08-0.21), 0.35 (0.22-0.53), and 0.94 (0.47-1.67) per 100 person-years, while these were 0.19 (0.07-0.41), 0.49 (0.18-1.07), and 0.86 (0.10-3.11) during COC use, and 0.73 (0.30-1.51), 1.97 (0.94-3.63), and 7.65 (3.08-15.76) during pregnancy. COC use and pregnancy were independent risk factors for VTE, with highest risk during pregnancy postpartum, as demonstrated by adjusted hazard ratios of 16.0 (8.0-32.2) versus 2.2 (1.1-4.0) during COC use. Rather than strictly contraindicating COC use, we advocate that detailed counseling on all contraceptive options, including COCs, addressing the associated risks of both VTE and unintended pregnancy, enabling these women to make an informed choice.     

The incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism in carriers of factor V Leiden is related to concomitant thrombophilic disorders

The duration of anticoagulant treatment after a first episode of venous thromboembolism primarily depends on the risk of recurrence. Variability of recurrence rates in factor (F) V Leiden carriers may be due to concomitant thrombophilic disorders. A retrospective study was performed in 329 FV Leiden carriers with a history of venous thromboembolism (262 probands, 67 relatives). The annual rate of first recurrence was estimated in relatives. The contribution of concomitant thrombophilic disorders to the recurrence rate was evaluated in probands and relatives by a nested case--control analysis in 105 matched pairs of carriers either with or without recurrence. The overall annual recurrence rate was 2.3 per 100 patient-years. The adjusted risk of recurrence for concomitant thrombophilic disorders was: 9.1 (1.3-62.8) for the FII mutation; 1.0 (0.2-4.9) for homozygosity for FV Leiden; 1.5 (0.2-9.5) for inherited deficiencies of protein C or S; 1.8 (0.7-4.9) for FVIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) levels >122%; 5.4 (1.6-18.6) for fasting homocysteine levels >15.2 micromol/l; and 4.4 (1.0-18.7) for loading homocysteine levels >45.8 micromol/l. Of these disorders, only the FII mutation and hyperhomocysteinaemia significantly increased the risk of recurrence in FV Leiden carriers. The estimated recurrence rate ranged from 0.45 per 100 patient--years after a secondary first event in the absence of concomitant disorders to 4.8 per 100 patient-years when a spontaneous first event was combined with concomitant disorders. Our study provides supportive evidence that the incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism in heterozygous FV Leiden carriers depends on the concomitance of other thrombophilic disorders, in addition to whether the first thrombotic event occurred spontaneously.     

Genetic analysis, phenotypic diagnosis, and risk of venous thrombosis in families with inherited deficiencies of protein S

Protein S deficiency is a recognized risk factor for venous thrombosis. Of all the inherited thrombophilic conditions, it remains the most difficult to diagnose because of phenotypic variability, which can lead to inconclusive results. We have overcome this problem by studying a cohort of patients from a single center where the diagnosis was confirmed at the genetic level. Twenty-eight index patients with protein S deficiency and a PROS1 gene defect were studied, together with 109 first-degree relatives. To avoid selection bias, we confined analysis of total and free protein S levels and thrombotic risk to the patients' relatives. In this group of relatives, a low free protein S level was the most reliable predictor of a PROS1 gene defect (sensitivity 97.7%, specificity 100%). First-degree relatives with a PROS1 gene defect had a 5.0-fold higher risk of thrombosis (95% confidence interval, 1. 5-16.8) than those with a normal PROS1 gene and no other recognized thrombophilic defect. Although pregnancy/puerperium and immobility/trauma were important precipitating factors for thrombosis, almost half of the events were spontaneous. Relatives with splice-site or major structural defects in the PROS1 gene were more likely to have had a thrombotic event and had significantly lower total and free protein S levels than those relatives having missense mutations. We conclude that persons with PROS1 gene defects and protein S deficiency are at increased risk of thrombosis and that free protein S estimation offers the most reliable way of diagnosing the deficiency. (Blood. 2000;95:1935-1941)     

Incidence of and Mortality from Venous Thromboembolism in a Real-world Population: The Q-VTE Study Cohort

Background

The public health burden of venous thromboembolism, which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is not fully known, and contemporary incidence and mortality estimates are needed. We determined the incidence and case fatality of venous thromboembolism in a general population.

Methods

Using the administrative health care databases of the Canadian province of Québec, we identified all incident cases of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism between 2000 and 2009 and classified them as definite or probable venous thromboembolism. We formed 2 patient cohorts, one with definite cases and the other including cases with definite or probable venous thromboembolism that were followed until December 31, 2009.

Results

We identified 67,354 definite and 35,123 probable cases of venous thromboembolism. The age- and sex-adjusted incidence rates of definite or probable venous thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism were 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-1.23), 0.78 (95% CI, 0.77-0.79), and 0.45 (95% CI, 0.44-0.45) per 1000 person-years, respectively, while for definite venous thromboembolism it was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.89-0.90) per 1000 person-years. The 30-day and 1-year case-fatality rates after definite or probable venous thromboembolism were 10.6% (95% CI, 10.4-10.8) and 23.0% (95% CI, 22.8-23.3), respectively, and were slightly higher among definite cases. The 1-year survival rate was 0.47 (95% CI, 0.46-0.48) for cases with definite or probable venous thromboembolism and cancer, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.93-0.94) for cases with unprovoked venous thromboembolism, and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.83-0.84) for cases with venous thromboembolism secondary to a major risk factor. Similar survival rates were seen for cases with definite venous thromboembolism.

Conclusion

The risk of venous thromboembolism in the general population remains high, and mortality, especially in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism, is substantial.     

Influence of thrombophilia on risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism while on warfarin: results from a randomized trial

We sought to determine whether thrombophilic defects increase recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) during warfarin therapy. Six hundred sixty-one patients with unprovoked VTE who were randomized to extended low-intensity (international normalized ratio [INR], 1.5-1.9) or conventional-intensity (INR, 2.0-3.0) anticoagulant therapy were tested for thrombophilia and followed for a mean of 2.3 years. One or more thrombophilic defects were present in 42% of patients. The overall rate of recurrent VTE was 0.9% per patient-year. Recurrent VTE was not increased in the presence of factor V Leiden (hazard ratio [HR], 0.7; 95% CI, 0.2-2.6); the 20210G>A prothrombin gene mutation (HR, 0); antithrombin deficiency (HR, 0); elevated factor VIII (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.1-5.4); elevated factor XI (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.1-5.0), or elevated homocysteine (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.1-5.3), but showed a trend to an increase with an antiphospholipid antibody (HR, 2.9; 95% CI, 0.8-10.5). Compared with patients with no thrombophilic defects, the rate of recurrence was not increased in the presence of one (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.2-2.3) or more than one (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.2-3.4) defect. We conclude that single or multiple thrombophilic defects are not associated with a higher risk of recurrent VTE during warfarin therapy.     

The risk of venous thromboembolism in family members with mutations in the genes of factor V or prothrombin or both

Factor V Leiden and the G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene are the most frequent abnormalities associated with venous thromboembolism. It is unknown whether the risks due to the presence of either mutation are of the same magnitude. We compared the prevalence and incidence rate of venous thromboembolism in relatives with either mutation or both. The finding of different rates might influence the strategies for primary prevention of thrombosis in carriers of these mutations. The study population included 1076 relatives of probands with the prothrombin gene mutation, factor V Leiden or both who underwent screening for inherited thrombophilia and were found to be carriers of single mutations or double mutations or who were non-carriers. The prevalence of venous thromboembolism was 5.7% in relatives with the prothrombin gene mutation, 7.8% in those with factor V Leiden, 17.1% in those with both mutations and 2.5% in non-carriers. Annual incidences of thrombosis were 0.13% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-0.24], 0.19% (0.13-0.25), 0.42% (0.15-0.83) and 0.066% (0.03-0.11), respectively, and the relative risk of thrombosis was two times higher in carriers of the prothrombin gene mutation, three times higher in those with factor V Leiden and six times higher in double carriers than in non-carriers. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in carriers of the prothrombin gene mutation is slightly lower than that observed in carriers of factor V Leiden, whereas in carriers of both mutations it is two or three times higher. These findings suggest that lifelong primary anticoagulant prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism is not needed in asymptomatic carriers of single or double mutations. Anticoagulant prophylaxis seems to be indicated only when transient risk factors for thrombosis coexist with mutations.     

The contribution of inherited and acquired thrombophilic defects, alone or combined with antiphospholipid antibodies, to venous and arterial thromboembolism in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is associated with an increased risk of venous (VTE) and arterial thromboembolism (ATE). Lupus anticoagulant (LA) and anticardiolipin antibodies (ACAs) are established risk factors. We assessed the contribution of deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C, total protein S, factor V Leiden, the prothrombin G20210A mutation and APC resistance, either alone or in various combinations with LA and/or ACAs, to the thrombotic risk in a cohort of 144 consecutive patients with SLE. Median follow-up was 12.7 years. VTE had occurred in 10% and ATE in 11% of patients. LA,ACAs, factor V Leiden, and the prothrombin mutation were identified as risk factors for VTE. Annual incidences of VTE were 2.01 (0.74-4.37) in patients with one of these disorders and 3.05 (0.63-8.93) in patients with 2 disorders. The risk of VTE was 20- and 30-fold higher, respectively, compared with the normal population. In contrast with LA and ACAs, thrombophilic disorders did not influence the risk of ATE. In conclusion, factor V Leiden and the prothrombin mutation contribute to the risk of VTE in patients with SLE, and potentiate this risk when one of these thrombophilic defects are combined with LA and/or ACAs.     

Abnormally short activated partial thromboplastin time values are associated with increased risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism after oral anticoagulation withdrawal

This study prospectively evaluated the relationship between activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence after oral anticoagulant (OA) withdrawal in patients with a previous unprovoked VTE event. Six hundred twenty-eight patients (331 males; median age: 67 years) were followed after OA interruption (mean follow-up = 22 months). Three to four weeks from OA discontinuation patients were given a complete thrombophilic work-out, including aPTT (automated aPTT). Recurrent symptomatic VTE events (objectively documented) occurred in 71/628 (11.3%, 6.8/100 person-years) patients. The VTE recurrence rate was 17.5% and 7.5% in patients with aPTT in the lower (ratio < or =0.90) and in the upper (ratio >1.05) quartiles. The recurrence risk was more than twofold higher in patients with ratio < or =0.90 versus those of the reference category [Relative risk (RR): 2.38 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18-4.78)]. As expected, the increase in recurrence risk disappeared after adjustment for factor VIII, IX and XI levels [RR: 1.74 (95%CI: 0.43-2.76)]. In contrast, the risk was persistently increased in patients with a ratio < or =0.90 [RR: 2.07 (95%CI: 1.02-4.18)] after adjustment for age, gender and d-dimer level. The aPTT predictive value was independent of the presence of inherited thrombophilic alterations. In conclusion, abnormally short aPTT values are associated with a significantly increased risk of VTE recurrence.     

Factor XIII Val34Leu and the risk of venous thromboembolism in factor V Leiden carriers

A mutation in factor XIII (Val34Leu) was reported to protect against venous thromboembolism. We evaluated the effect of Val34Leu on thrombotic risk in 352 factor V Leiden carriers who were first-degree relatives of 132 thrombotic propositi carrying factor V Leiden. The total observation period was 2,594 years in 92 Val34Leu carriers and 7,444 years in 260 non-carriers. The annual incidence of a first episode of venous thromboembolism was 0.31% in Val34Leu carriers and 0.44% in non-carriers [relative risk (RR) for venous thromboembolism: 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.5]. Age-specific RR for venous thromboembolism were (for Val34Leu carriers and non-carriers respectively): 1.0 (95% CI 0.3-3.2) in the age group of 15-30 years, 0.4 (95%, CI 0.05-3.0) in the age group of 30-45 years, 0.6 (95% CI 0.1-2.9) in the group aged 45-60 years and 0.5 (95% CI 0.06-4.5) in relatives older than 60 years. In conclusion, the impact of FXIII Val34Leu on the venous thromboembolic risk is modest, suggesting that screening for this mutation in factor V Leiden carriers is not justified.     

The incidence of venous thromboembolism in asymptomatic carriers of a deficiency of antithrombin, protein C, or protein S: a prospective cohort study

Deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C, and protein S are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. The objective of this study was to prospectively assess the incidence of venous thromboembolism in nontreated asymptomatic subjects with such a deficiency. We conducted a prospective cohort study in asymptomatic family members of unselected patients who presented with a venous thromboembolic event and who were found to have a deficiency of antithrombin, protein C, or protein S. No anticoagulant prophylaxis was given to the study participants, except during risk periods for venous thromboembolism. All venous thromboembolic events were diagnosed by objective diagnostic tests. A total of 208 individuals with a mean age of 37 years (range, 15 to 79) were included in the study. A total of 611 patient observation years was obtained. Nine venous thromboembolic events occurred, resulting in an annual incidence of 1.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7 to 2.8) for the 3 deficiencies combined. Five of these events occurred spontaneously, resulting in an annual incidence of spontaneous venous thromboembolism of 0.8% (95% CI, 0.3 to 1.9). For antithrombin, protein C, and protein S deficiencies separately, this figure was 1.6%, 1.0%, and 0.4%, respectively. Thirty-four subjects experienced a total of 40 risk periods during which 4 venous thromboembolic events occurred (10% per risk period). We conclude that the use of continuous anticoagulant prophylaxis seems not warranted in asymptomatic individuals with a deficiency of antithrombin, protein C, or protein S. During risk periods for venous thromboembolism, adequate anticoagulant prophylaxis is necessary.     

Prothrombin 20210A mutation: a mild risk factor for venous thromboembolism but not for arterial thrombotic disease and pregnancy-related complications in a family study

BACKGROUND: The prothrombin 20210A mutation has been associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Its relationship with arterial disease and pregnancy-related complications is, however, still uncertain. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidences of first venous and arterial thrombotic events and pregnancy-related complications in relatives of patients with the mutation. METHODS: After clinical classification, the presence of the mutation was determined in first-degree relatives of consecutive patients with the mutation and a history of VTE or premature atherosclerosis. Relatives with and without the mutation were compared. RESULTS: Of all relatives, 204 (50%) were heterozygous, 5 were homozygous, and 198 had a normal genotype. The annual incidence of a first episode of VTE was 0.35% and 0.18% in carriers and noncarriers, respectively (odds ratio [OR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9-4.1); the annual incidence of a first arterial thrombosis was 0.22% and 0.15% in carriers and noncarriers, respectively (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.8-6.3). The annual incidence of a first myocardial infarction was 0.14% (95% CI, 0.05%-0.23%) and 0.05% (0.01%-0.14%) in carriers and noncarriers, respectively (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.0-22.5; P =.06). In particular, homozygous carriers were at increased risk of VTE (OR, 6.0; 95% CI, 1.3-27.2), whereas a history of VTE in the proband influenced the risk of VTE in the relatives. Women with the mutation did not experience significantly more pregnancy-related complications than their relatives with a normal genotype. CONCLUSIONS: The prothrombin mutation is a mild risk factor for VTE within families of carriers but does not seem to play an important role in arterial thrombotic disease, with the exception of myocardial infarction, or in pregnancy-related complications.     

The risk of venous and arterial thrombosis in hyperhomocysteinemic subjects may be a result of elevated factor VIII levels

In a large retrospective study of thrombophilic families, we analyzed 405 relatives of patients, hypothesizing that hyperhomocysteinemia and elevated factor VIII levels are closely related. Median factor VIII levels in hyperhomocysteinemic relatives were 169 IU/dL, compared with 136 IU/dL in normohomocysteinemic relatives (p =0.007), and were more often elevated (>150 IU/dL; p =0.006). Hyperhomocysteinemia was associated with an increased risk of venous and arterial thrombosis; relative risk (RR) 2.6 (CI 1.3-4.8) and 3.7 (CI 1.5-8.4) respectively. Relatives with elevated FVIII were also at risk; RR 2.3 (CI 1.4-4.0) for venous thrombosis and 2.3 (CI 1.0-5.1) for arterial thrombosis. After excluding all relatives with elevated factor VIII, RR for hyperhomocysteinemia and venous thrombosis dropped to 1.3 (CI 0.2-9.8) and no relatives had arterial thrombosis. We conclude that it is likely that the increased risk of venous and arterial thrombosis in hyperhomocysteinemia is mainly related to elevated FVIII levels.     

Inherited thrombophilia is associated with deep vein thrombosis in a Colombian population

The development of venous thromboembolism is influenced by a variety of genetic and environmental risk factors. A few studies have ascertained whether thrombophilic defects are risk factors for venous thromboembolism in Latin American populations with a variable degree of admixture, such as the Colombian population. To address this issue, we conducted a case-control study involving 100 consecutive patients with deep vein thrombosis and 114 healthy controls from the Hospital Universitario San Vicente de Paúl, Medellín, Colombia. Activated protein C resistance (APC resistance) was detected in 25/99 patients vs. 6/114 controls (OR = 6.08, 95% CI = 2.23-17.47). Ten of 100 patients carried the factor V Leiden mutation vs. 1/114 controls (OR = 12.56, 95% CI = 1.61-267). APC resistance was associated with the factor V Leiden mutation in only 10/25 patients. The prothrombin G20210A mutation was found in 4/100 patients, but none of the controls (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the proportion of homozygous carriers of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T variant among patients and controls. In conclusion, in our studied population, factor V Leiden, APC resistance, and prothrombin G20210A were associated with an increased risk of deep vein thrombosis. However, the frequencies of these thrombophilic defects and of APC resistance associated with factor V Leiden was lower than the corresponding frequencies previously reported for Caucasian populations. Further study is required to assess the influence of ethnicity on thrombophilia.