Serum hepatitis B virus RNA predicts response to peginterferon treatment in HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA in serum is a novel biomarker that reflects cccDNA activity. We investigated whether HBV RNA can predict serological response to peginterferon (PEG‐IFN) treatment. Serum HBV RNA levels were retrospectively measured at weeks 0, 12, 24 and 52 of therapy and after treatment discontinuation (week 78) in 266 HBeAg‐positive chronic HBV patients who had participated in a global randomized controlled trial (HBV99‐01 study). Patients received 52 weeks PEG‐IFN monotherapy (n = 136) or PEG‐IFN and lamivudine (n = 130). The primary end point was HBeAg loss 24 weeks after PEG‐IFN discontinuation. At baseline, the mean serum level of HBV RNA was 6.8 (SD 1.2) log c/mL. HBV RNA levels declined to 4.7 (1.7) log c/mL after one year of PEG‐IFN therapy alone and to 3.3 (1.2)log c/mL after combination therapy. From week 12 onward, HBV RNA level was significantly lower in patients who achieved HBeAg loss at the end of follow‐up as compared to those who did not, regardless of treatment allocation (week 12:4.4 vs 5.1 log c/mL, P = .01; week 24:3.7 vs 4.9 log c/mL, P < .001). The performance of a multivariable model based on HBV RNA level was comparable at week 12 (AUC 0.68) and 24 (AUC 0.72) of therapy. HBV RNA level above 5.5 log c/mL at week 12 showed negative predictive values of 93/67/90/64% for HBV genotypes A/B/C/D for the prediction of HBeAg loss. In conclusion, HBV RNA in serum declines profoundly during PEG‐IFN treatment. Early on‐treatment HBV RNA level may be used to predict nonresponse.     

Serum HBcrAg is better than HBV RNA and HBsAg in reflecting intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA

The correlation between serum HBcrAg and HBV RNA is unclear, and correlations of intrahepatic cccDNA with HBcrAg, HBV RNA and HBsAg are rarely reported in the same cohort. This study aimed to assess the correlation of HBcrAg with HBV RNA and HBsAg, and investigate whether serum HBcrAg is superior to serum HBV RNA and HBsAg in reflecting intrahepatic HBV cccDNA in HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative CHB patients. In this study, 85 HBeAg‐positive and 25 HBeAg‐negative patients who have never received antiviral therapy were included. Among HBeAg‐positive patients, HBcrAg was correlated positively with HBsAg (r = 0.564, P < 0.001) and HBV RNA (r = 0.445, P < 0.001), and HBV RNA was also correlated positively with HBsAg (r = 0.323, P = 0.003). Among HBeAg‐negative patients, no significant correlation was observed between HBcrAg, HBsAg and HBV RNA. By multivariable linear regression, HBcrAg (β = ?0.563, P < 0.001), HBsAg (β = ?0.328, P < 0.001) and HBV RNA (β = 0.180, P = 0.003) were all associated with cccDNA levels among HBeAg‐positive patients, but only serum HBcrAg was associated with cccDNA level (β = 0.774, P = 0.000) among HBeAg‐negative patients. HBcrAg was better correlated with cccDNA as compared to HBsAg and HBV RNA, irrespective of HBeAg status. Among HBeAg‐positive patients, though HBcrAg level was influenced by hepatic inflammatory activity and HBV DNA levels, the good correlations of HBcrAg with cccDNA persisted after stratification by inflammatory activity and HBV DNA levels. In conclusion, correlations of serum HBcrAg, HBV RNA and HBsAg levels differ significantly between HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative patients, but serum HbcrAg correlates with cccDNA levels better than HBV RNA and HBsAg, irrespective of HBeAg status.     

Prediction of response to entecavir therapy in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B based on on-treatment HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA levels

Summary. Quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) assays are emerging as effective tools of on‐treatment predictors of response to antiviral agents, in addition to monitoring serum HBV DNA levels. However, the dynamic relationship between quantitative HBsAg, as well as HBeAg and HBV DNA, and the predictability of subsequent clinical outcomes during entecavir (ETV) therapy remain unclear. Eighty‐two patients with HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) received ETV therapy for ≥3 years. Virologic response (VR) after 3 years of ETV therapy was achieved in 73 (89.0%) patients. Among baseline and on‐treatment factors, on‐treatment HBV DNA levels performed better with respect to the prediction of response than HBsAg and HBeAg levels. Especially, the performance of absolute values of HBV DNA with respect to response was superior to HBV DNA decline from the baseline. The best predictive value was an absolute HBV DNA level of 2.3 log₁₀ IU/mL at month 6 (areas under the curve [AUROC], 0.977; 95% CI, 0.940–1.000; P < 0.001). HBeAg seroconversion after 3 years of therapy was achieved in 26 (31.7%) patients. On‐treatment HBeAg levels performed better with respect to the prediction of seroconversion than HBsAg and HBV DNA levels. The best cut‐off value for the HBeAg level at month 12 for the prediction of seroconversion was 0.62 log₁₀ PEIU/mL. Although the HBsAg level at baseline is often used to predict the antiviral potency of entecavir, on‐treatment HBV DNA and HBeAg levels are more helpful for prediction of subsequent clinical outcomes in HBeAg‐positive CHB patients with entecavir treatment.     

Predictors of liver histological changes and a sustained virological response to peginterferon among chronic hepatitis B e antigen‐positive patients with normal or minimally elevated alanine aminotransferase levels

A proportion of chronic hepatitis B patients with normal or only minimally elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels display significant histologic changes and would benefit from antiviral therapy. We aim to evaluate the histologic abnormalities seen in these patients and then determine which of them would most likely respond to peginterferon therapy. One hundred and thirteen hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)‐positive patients with a normal or minimally elevated ALT level and moderate‐to‐severe histologic changes in their liver tissue were selected to receive peginterferon monotherapy and participate in a follow‐up analysis. A multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that increasing age (P=.049) and lower hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels (P=.038) were associated with significant histological abnormalities in patients with a normal or minimally elevated ALT. Our predictive model which incorporated HBeAg testing at treatment week 12 combined with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) testing at treatment week 24 was able to identify which patients with a normal ALT level would achieve a sustained virological response (SVR) (positive predictive value [PPV]: 66.7%, negative predictive value [NPV]: 90.0%). Lower HBsAg and HBeAg levels at treatment week 24 were associated with a SVR in patients with a minimally elevated ALT level (PPV: 100.0%, NPV: 100.0%). A liver biopsy and antiviral therapy should be strongly considered when treating HBeAg‐positive patients with a normal or minimally elevated ALT level, low HBV DNA level, and aged >35 years. On‐treatment quantification of combined HBsAg and HBeAg test results may be useful for predicting a SVR to peginterferon monotherapy in these patients.     

Quantitation of HBsAg predicts response to entecavir therapy in HBV genotype C patients

AIM:To analysis the factors that predict the response to entecavir therapy in chronic hepatitis patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype C. METHODS:Fifty patients [hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative:HBeAg-positive = 26:24] with HBV genotype C, who received nave entecavir therapy for 2 years, were analyzed. Patients who showed HBV DNA levels ≥ 3.0 log viral copies/mL after 2 years of entecavir therapy were designated as slow-responders, while those that showed 3.0 log copies/mL were termed rapid- responders. Quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels (qHBsAg) were determined by the Architect HBsAg QT immunoassay. Hepatitis B core-related antigen was detected by enzyme immunoassay. Pre-C and Core promoter mutations were determined using by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Drug-resistance mutations were detected by the PCR-Invader method. RESULTS:At year 2, HBV DNA levels in all patients in the HBeAg-negative group were 3.0 log copies/mL. In contrast, in the HBeAg-positive group, 41.7% were slow-responders, while 58.3% were rapid-responders. No entecavir-resistant mutants were detected in the slow-responders. When the pretreatment factors were compared between the slow-and rapid-responders; the median qHBsAg in the slow-responders was 4.57 log IU/mL, compared with 3.63 log IU/mL in the rapid-responders (P 0.01). When the pretreatment factors predictive of HBV DNA-negative status at year 2 in all 50 patients were analyzed, HBeAg-negative status, low HBV DNA levels, and low qHBsAg levels were significant (P 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that the low qHBsAg level was the most significant predictive factor (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION:Quantitation of HBsAg could be a useful indicator to predict response to entecavir therapy.     

Analysis of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) using high‐sensitivity HBsAg assays in hepatitis B virus carriers in whom HBsAg seroclearance was confirmed by conventional assays

Aim

We investigated the utility of high‐sensitivity hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) assays compared with conventional HBsAg assays.

Methods

Using serum samples from 114 hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers in whom HBsAg seroclearance was confirmed by conventional HBsAg assays (cut‐off value, 0.05 IU/mL), the amount of HBsAg was re‐examined by high‐sensitivity HBsAg assays (cut‐off value, 0.005 IU/mL). Cases negative for HBsAg in both assays were defined as consistent cases, and cases positive for HBsAg in the high‐sensitivity HBsAg assay only were defined as discrepant cases.

Results

There were 55 (48.2%) discrepant cases, and the range of HBsAg titers determined by high‐sensitivity HBsAg assays was 0.005–0.056 IU/mL. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of nucleos(t)ide analog therapy, liver cirrhosis, and negative anti‐HBs contributed to the discrepancies between the two assays. Cumulative anti‐HBs positivity rates among discrepant cases were 12.7%, 17.2%, 38.8%, and 43.9% at baseline, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years, respectively, whereas the corresponding rates among consistent cases were 50.8%, 56.0%, 61.7%, and 68.0%, respectively. Hepatitis B virus DNA negativity rates were 56.4% and 81.4% at baseline, 51.3% and 83.3% at 1 year, and 36.8% and 95.7% at 3 years, among discrepant and consistent cases, respectively. Hepatitis B surface antigen reversion was observed only in discrepant cases.

Conclusions

Re‐examination by high‐sensitivity HBsAg assays revealed that HBsAg was positive in approximately 50% of cases. Cumulative anti‐HBs seroconversion rates and HBV‐DNA seroclearance rates were lower in these cases, suggesting a population at risk for HBsAg reversion.     

非活动性HBsAg携带者临床特征及自发性HBsAg血清学清除相关因素分析

目的了解非活动性HBsAg携带者(inactive HBsAg carriers,IHC)临床特征及自发性HBsAg血清学清除相关因素。方法纳入2009年1月至2015年12月在北京佑安医院就诊且至少随访一次的IHC 289例,所有患者均未接受任何核苷类似物和(或)干扰素抗病毒治疗。将对随访过程中是否出现自发性HBsAg血清学清除患者进行差异比较。结果289例IHC的ALT水平为(21.40±7.64)U/L,血清HBsAg、HBeAg、HBV DNA水平分别为4592.00(2262.00,6741.00)COI、0.10(0.09,0.12)COI和430.05(213.25,824.25)IU/mL。血清HBsAg与HbeAg呈正相关(r=1.86,P<0.01),与年龄呈负相关(r=-1.82,P<0.01),与HBV DNA(r=0.09,P=0.58)无明显相关性。平均随访3年,其中17例(2.60%)患者发生自发性HBsAg血清学清除,年发生率为0.87%,其血清HBsAg、HBeAg、HBV DNA水平明显低于无自发性HBsAg血清学清除者(均P<0.01),而两组之间年龄、性别、肝功能等无明显差异。结论在IHC中,血清HBsAg与HBV DNA水平无明显相关性,血清HBsAg、HBeAg、HBV DNA水平较低者更易发生自发性HBsAg血清学清除。     

血清HBsAg滴度监测对恩替卡韦治疗的HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者应答反应的预测价值

目的探讨HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎（CHB）患者血清HBsAg滴度的动态变化对恩替卡韦（ETV）治疗反应的预测价值。方法选择2011年1月～2012年1月在我肝病中心住院及门诊接受ETV（0.5mg/d）治疗的HBeAg阳性CHB患者78例,随访1年。于抗病毒治疗的0、3、6、9和12 m分别收集患者血清,采用化学发光法定量检测各时间点的HBsAg和HBeAg滴度;采用实时荧光定量PCR法检测血清HBV DNA载量;采用Pearson相关分析分析HBsAg与HBV DNA水平相关性,采用受试者工作特征曲线（ROC）预测患者的病毒学应答和确定最佳临界值。结果在78例患者中,69例（88.5%）患者发生病毒学应答（VR）,9例未发生病毒学应答;VR组患者基线ALT水平[（141.8±27.2）IU/ml]与未发生VR患者[（136.2±29.7）IU/ml]比,无统计学意义（t=0.27,P=0.793）;HBV DNA[（6.7±1.0）lg IU/ml]明显低于未发生VR患者[（7.6±0.8）lg IU/ml,t=-2.27,P=0.033];HBsAg滴度与未发生VR患者比,无统计学意义[（3.8±0.6）lg IU/ml对（4.0±0.4）lg IU/ml,t=-1.75,P=0.094）];HBsAg与HBV DNA水平呈正相关（r=0.45,P=0.02）;HBsAg在治疗开始的前3个月下降较快,3个月后下降较缓慢,从基线到治疗3个月时,VR组患者较未发生VR患者HBsAg下降更快[（0.3±0.2）lg IU/ml对（0.2±0.1）lg IU/ml,t=2.245,P=0.035）];在治疗3个月时,lg HBsAg滴度的ROC曲线下面积最大（AUC=0.840,P=0.005）,临界值为3.85 lg IU/ml的Youden指数最大（0.602）,其诊断敏感度为84.2%,特异度为78.7%。结论 ETV治疗3个月时lg HBsAg≤3.85 lg IU/ml可作为预测ETV治疗1年发生病毒学应答的指标。     

拉米夫定长期维持应答患者血清乙型肝炎表面抗原水平的变化特点

目的 了解拉米夫定长期治疗下血清HBsAg的动态变化特点.方法 研究对象为HBeAg阳性、拉米夫定为初始抗病毒治疗且取得快速和持久(从治疗24周至观察期末HBV DNA持续检测不到)病毒学应答的慢性乙型肝炎患者.血清HBsAg定量检测采用雅培Architect方法,HBV基因型用直接测序法确定.结果 3年观察期间有26例(57.8%)患者发生HBeAg转阴(其中1例HBsAg转阴).治疗12周时血清HBsAg水平中位数降至基线的39.5%(P<0.01),但之后下降不明显.血清HBsAg的变化特征在HBcAg转阴或持续阳性的患者间相似.基因B型患者在治疗头12周血清HBsAg水平下降幅度较基因C型更大(75.5%比26.0%,P<0.05).在个体患者中,血清HBsAg的动态变化类型主要有双相型(治疗12和24周HBsAg低于基线的60%)和稳定型(治疗12和24周HBsAg高于基线的80%).基线血清HBsAg水平低(比数比值为0.020,95%可信区间为0.002~0.743,P<0.05)和基因C型感染(比数比值为8.206,95%可信区间为1.070~62.948,P<0.05)是血清HBsAg在拉米夫定长期治疗下下降不明显的主要因素.结论 血清HBsAg在拉米夫定快速和持久抑制HBV复制时主要表现为两种变化类型,并和HBV基因型关系密切.     

Pronounced decline of serum HBsAg in chronic hepatitis B patients with long-term effective nucleos(t)ide analogs therapy

Aims: This study aims to investigate the kinetics of serum HBsAg levels in chronic hepatitis B patients with long-term nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) therapy.

Methods: This was a retrospective clinical study. Serum HBsAg in serial samples of 94 patients, who received at least 8 years of NAs therapy, were measured using Elecsys^® HBsAg II Quant Assay.

Results: In this cohort, serum HBsAg levels reduced from 3.80 log10?IU/mL at baseline to 2.72 log10?IU/mL at year 8 (p?p?p?=?.001). As compared to patients with slow (0–1 log10?IU/mL) or steady HBsAg(≤0 log10?IU/mL) decline at year 1, patients with a rapid HBsAg (≥1 log10?IU/mL) decline had a significantly lower HBsAg levels from year 2 to 8. However, Cox regression analysis showed that only absolute HBsAg levels at year 1 was an independent predictor of subsequent HBsAg <1000?IU/mL at year 8 of antiviral therapy(HR 0.242, p?=?.004).

Conclusion: Pronounced HBsAg declines could be achieved in patients after long-term effective therapy with NAs, and on-treatment low serum HBsAg level at year 1 might be a predictor of serum HBsAg <1000?IU/mL at year 8.     

Sustained efficacy of adefovir add-on therapy in chronic hepatitis B patient with a poor virological response to peginterferon alfa

Abstract

Background. Currently, there is no consensus on the recommendation of peginterferon alfa (pegIFNα) to chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with poor viral response (EVR). This study aimed to assess the sustained curative efficacy of adefovir (ADV) add-on therapy in optimizing pegIFNα monotherapy. Methods. A total of 85 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive CHB patients with poor virological response at month 6 after starting pegIFNα-2a were enrolled, and received either pegIFNα-2a continuing monotherapy (group A, n = 51) or add-on therapy with ADV (group B, n = 34). The treatment duration for all patients was 6 months, and the sustained responses after the end of treatment were evaluated between two groups. Results. The baseline characteristics were comparable between two groups. At months 6 after treatment completion, the sustained virological response (SVR) rates were 31.4% and 73.5%, the sustained biochemical response (SBR) rates were 39.2% and 85.3% in group A and group B respectively, and the difference in either SVR or SBR was statistically significant (both p < 0.001). As compared to patients in group A, significantly more patients in group B obtained HBeAg loss (19.6% vs. 55.9%, p = 0.001) and seroconversion (13.7% vs. 41.2%, p = 0.004). Conclusion: ADV add-on therapy could significantly improve and sustain the curative efficacy of CHB patient with poor virological response to pegIFNα-2a monotherapy, but further large well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings.     

Intrahepatic expression of HBsAg and HBcAg in asymptomatic HBsAg carriers and its follow-up

Intrahepatic expression of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg) was investigated in 46 asymptomatic HBsAg carriers by a direct immuno-fluorescent method. In 21 HBeAg positive carriers, HBsAg was expressed diffusely on the membrane of hepatocytes, with associated cytoplasmic localization in a few scattered hepato-cytes. HBcAg was expressed in the nucleus of many hepatocytes and in the cytoplasm of a few scattered hepatocytes, but not on the cell membrane. In 25 anti-HBe positive carriers, HBsAg was expressed on the surface and in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes diffusely and/or focally, but neither intrahepatic HBcAg nor serum HBV-DNA was detected. Repeat liver biopsies were performed in 17 patients. In eight of 13 HBeAg-positive HBsAg carriers, who developed histologically proven chronic hepatitis and liver cirrhosis, the localization of HBsAg in liver had changed from a membranous to a mixed (membrane and cytoplasm) pattern, and localization of HBcAg in liver had changed from a predominantly nuclear to a predominantly membranous and cytoplasmic pattern. However, in two HBeAg and two anti-HBe positive cases who showed no biochemical and histologic change at follow-up, the intrahepatic expressions of HBsAg and HBcAg in the second biopsies remained unchanged. Thus, decrease in membranous expression of HBsAg and increase in membranous and cytoplasmic expression of HBcAg were associated with progression to chronic liver disease. This suggests that membranous HBcAg may represent the major target in the process of injury to hepatocytes.